Added: 1 year ago
From: DiscoveringReligion
Views: 84,017
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (512)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • The last part of the video, the Homo Sapiens are burying something .. what are they burying? Does anybody know what its called?

  • Comment removed

  • I respect PEOPLE who deserve my respect. I do not respect IDEAS that are false. They do more harm than good, hinder progress and, above all else, misconstrue the minds of men. You failed to notice in what context I used respect. This is an example of misconstruing what is truth. Evolution is an inconvenient truth to creationists, but a truth that creates vaccines for diseases, determines environmental influence on species, etc... It is science - what's keeping you fed, warm, and entertained.

  • evolution is a bad fairy tale.

  • @darkfur35 Evolution is an inconvenient FACT. Religion is a product of ignoring truth.

  • @RexFut Religion is a fact. evolution is a made up fairy tale.

  • @darkfur35 You've just proved my previous comment's point. That, or you're a troll. None of which I respect in the least.

  • @RexFut I know you dont respect anybody. That is a fact.

  • none of these so called ancestors had such beautiful women. take a good look at the shape counter and facial features of a beautiful woman. And think to yourself is there any creature on this earth like her or anything more beautiful. One good look at a very beautiful woman will convince u we did not come from apes.

  • @yusufulhas

    What??? Human "beauty" has been sexually selected over millions of years. No animal, other than the dairy cow, has such large mammary glands in a time of non-pregnancy. Human men found large breast appealing and thus women with large breast were selected to mate, and as a result their offspring also had them. But not all women have large breasts or even beautiful faces. Furthermore, many "creatures" are beautiful, but I'm not a zoophile so I don't find animals sexually attractive.

  • @DiscoveringReligion

    lol sexually selected. Women have allways been beautiful. some are of course some aren't but even women recognize women as beautiful. Ask a little boy or girl without any sexual inclination yet if the woman is more beautiful than the man. or any animal or creature. This is coming from a person who can look at a beautiful woman and say i'm not attracted to her(i'm straight).

  • @DiscoveringReligion

    Tell me, how come their is a mechanism that magically kicks off after the baby is born and why the body knows it's time to breastfeed. i'm studying biology right now so i'm not stupid or foolish. That stuffs a complete mystery. Their are alot of unexplainable "coincidences" that would lead the truly rational mind to believe that their's something constructing existence.

  • @yusufulhas

    It's not magical, it's hormonal. The body goes through numerous hormonal changes during gestation. During the third trimester the hypothalamus gets ready to release large quantities of oxytocin and prolactin. Oxytocin is responsible for contracting the uterus during child birth as well as preparing the nipple to release milk, while prolactin stimulates milk production. I am in medical school -- study science it will set you free from superstition.

  • @DiscoveringReligion

    interesting to know. apparently u do not understand or want to ask the question of why all of this happens so conveniently.

  • @yusufulhas

    Are you so desperate to find evidence of the divine that you would label natural hormonal fluctuations in the body as "magic"? You really are grasping at straws, wow.

  • @DiscoveringReligion

    I don't need any evidence. i'm far beyond that stage in my life. far beyond. My life behavior and understandings of things are totally different from anything u would know as normal. i can wake up and say somebody will give me a job today expect it and receive a job. i can do the same thing with almost anything i want. and it'll come in the exact way i want and the exact way it's been coming. i don't need proof for the divine

  • @yusufulhas

    Okay, then you're certifiably delusional. Things don't happen in our lives because we wish them to be so. If that were true, then try doing this little experiment: the next time you have a biology exam, don't study. Instead of reading your book, making notes, and doing practice questions, try praying. See how far that gets you! LOL

  • @DiscoveringReligion

    no they don't. They happen because Allah says so. we can only put in the orders. this is the world of means and everything is a process so u are confused as to what i'm talking about. i still have to apply look and talk presentably. That's why the prophet(saw) said trust in Allah but tie your camels.

  • @yusufulhas

    OH! So you DO have to study in order to pass an exam and you DO have to apply yourself in order to get a job! Interesting, so then your statement isn't true:

    "i can wake up and say somebody will give me a job today expect it and receive a job. i can do the same thing with almost anything i want. and it'll come in the exact way i want and the exact way it's been coming. " = FAIL

  • @DiscoveringReligion

    i didn't say anything about applying oneself. that's neccessary for anything in this world(for most people). of course u don't seem to realize how jobs don't grow on trees and it's rare like once in a lifetime for someone to walk up to someone and offer u a job. especially considering that... well it's hard for u to understand because of your "rational" thought processes.

  • @yusufulhas

    Yes, I am very rational, I don't live in a fantasy world where, "i can wake up and say somebody will give me a job today expect it and receive a job." I don't just expect things to happen without working for them. I will not wake up one day and get offered a job as a physician without putting years and years of hard work toward achieving my goals. Youre so determined to prove to others that God exists that you attribute coincidence and mere happenstance to acts of the divine. = FAIL.

  • @DiscoveringReligion

    I oppose using rationality outside of the context of scientific fields.

  • @DiscoveringReligion

    U know and fully understand the context of what i was saying. so i do not know why u keep bringing up irrelevant issues. in a video game u have to learn certain abilities or unlock certain tools to get to the next level. doesn't matter what cheat code u use.

  • @DiscoveringReligion

    yeah right coincidence. stop using that word. there's no such thing as a coincidence. i don't even know why they have it in the dictionary.

  • @yusufulhas

    Coincidence are all your miracles ever are.

  • @DiscoveringReligion

    are miracles coincidences or are coincidences miracles?

  • @yusufulhas

    At age six, children develop magical thinking and the ability to create imaginary friends. Some people seem to be stunted in their cognative development and never grow beyond such fantasies. No, there is no such thing as miracles. Psttt... by the way, fairies, dragons, and the bogeyman don't exist either, in case you didn't already know. LOL

  • @DiscoveringReligion

    you keep telling yourself that. lol. your society is owned and operated by people who believe in fairies and dragons. lmao

  • @yusufulhas this is true, which gives him more the reason to deseminate this information

  • @lukejtmulder

    if it's true then how come the spiritual elites control every single society on the earth and the ph.ds are living a drab boring life going to school because they believe a ph.d will save their ass from poverty?

  • @yusufulhas Spiritual elites = Greedy delusional assholes.

  • @llcasanova

    The spiritual elites of a society reflect the values of that society.

  • @lukejtmulder

    Your entire worldview is false and based upon numerous misconceptions and delusions. U can say that stuff to yourself and maybe u will feel complacent with that. But this is my life so it's not a delusion. Life isn't a delusion. i know alot of u types feel that way because u can't get what u want and/or don't know how. The delusion largely stems from taking science out of it's proper context. And declaring that science is the only way to know and understand things

  • The most interesting thing about this silly notion is that their is SCIENCE behind these things. Most people don't bother with the science of it. Knowing something exists is good enough. One can see a monkey and know there is a such thing as a monkey without knowing the ins and out of a monkey. Conclusion. one doesn't need science to know. You don't need science to know that u exist. science merely details the intricacies inside of existence. which at times may not be available.

  • @yusufulhas You must be from a third world country. Being ignorant and stupid is no way to live...believing in god's, fairy tales, and dragons. Your fucking hilarious.

  • @spareaxe

    Ignorant is someone who lives in a society but doesn't understand people. Someone who thinks he is intelligent for making assumptions.

  • @yusufulhas don't need a whole lot of brain power to understand your ignorance in the supernatural. Fail.

  • @spareaxe

    Someone who analyzes people by assumptions find no difficulty in understanding me.

  • @yusufulhas Oh good point. This one scientist, I don't remember his name. Him and a bunch of other scientist were trying to figure something out. But thn finally he stated something along the lines of,"We may know how fast an atom is moving, but we would never know where it is going and vise verse." I guess his point was that, as humans we aren't meant to know everything and that we should accept that.

  • @DiscoveringReligion

    that's funny., would u believe that the illuminati refers to themselves as the society of the grown boys?

  • I seriously doubt that some of u people can be considered to be human beings due to your outlook perspective and various philosophies about life. Generally Such people were allways sociallly behind in life. I used to be socially behind, until i took the time to analyze pay close attention and understand human nature behavior conversation. Their is nothing more intellectually satisfying than the study of human beings.

  • It's all a lie. homo sapiens did not come from neanderthals.

  • @yusufulhas no, but there is genetic evidence of inter-breeding in the modern human genome.

  • @stoltobot actually I should say x-chromosomal evidence of admixture in non-african modern human populations, meaning those that left Africa during the 40-50 thousand years ago.

  • @stoltobot

    They're is also evidence for the jinn interbreeding into the modern human genome. what's your point exactly?

  • @stoltobot

    also this evidence is still subject to skepticism. because the evidence comes from a false theory that their is no creator. Since their is no creator things happen spontanteously. One then entirely skips an idea that the genes are the same because the creator simply made the genes the same between the 2 species for whatever reason.

  • Ehhh the water monkey theory makes more sense.

  • The story is so fake, like habilus and golbilus we rivals and fought for food and developed bigger brain and longer noses....Please! fantasy and made up crap to brainwash the idiots.

  • LOL.  BRAINWASHING.

  • @glower125

    Obviously the scenes in this video are not historically accurate. However, the story told very well could have happened, for it is constructed upon tangible, scientifically verifiable evidence. I can think of many other stories that are built on much less, such as the "creation" story and Noah's Flood found in the Book of Genesis.

  • @DiscoveringReligion But there are not fossils that show evolution.

  • @jisaid08

    What do you mean by "show evolution"? We have fossils from over 20 different hominid species in addition to fossils from hundreds of species that show transitions from fish to amphibians, from amphibians to reptiles, from reptiles to birds, from walking mammals to legless whales, and more.

  • @DiscoveringReligion There has never been a transitional fossil found. Lucy was a chimpanzee. You have a lot of fossils of extinct apes maybe. Why aren't chimpanzees giving birth to humans? Chimpanzees don't live for millions of years.

  • @jisaid08

    WTF...

  • @DiscoveringReligion You have no answers to any of the things I just said. If there were any fossils you wouldn't have to defend your religion of evolution so much.

  • @jisaid08

    Whenever I'm asked why chimps don't give birth to humans I just have to bow out of the conversation. There is no point in talking with you. Either you are too stupid to understand the basics of science or you're so willfully ignorant that you prefer to persist under a superstitious delusion rather than learn what science has actually found. So, either way, it's just not worth my time. If you want answers to your questions then watch my 22 episode series, I'm not here to hold your hand.

  • @DiscoveringReligion Hahaha I am fucking with you. You've been a good sport though. I hold three advanced degrees in science and am pursing an PhD in evolutionary biology now. I enjoy trolling sometimes.

  • @jisaid08

    -_-

  • @jisaid08 if you hold three advanced degrees in science and are pursuing a PhD in evolutionary biology, then I'm Barack Obama.

  • @stratovani Not that I need to defend myself to you but I have a bachelor in biology, a masters in bioinformatics, and a masters in genetics. I can afford to be a professional student so I am. Nice to meet you Mr. Obama.

  • @jisaid08 - of course you do. That's why you have the intelligence and class to troll. Well done, Mr. Scientist.

  • @stratovani Apparently you have never met a graduate student. We are not very professional.

  • @jisaid08

    All that knowledge has caused u forget how to be a human being. kind of sad..

  • @jisaid08

    Did u minor in logic or academic truthfullness?

  • @yusufulhas In undergrad I had a minor in computer science.

  • @jisaid08

    wisdom>cognition

  • first species to migrate was homo habilus they went and evolved into Homo floresiensis,,,

  • "...with someone ignorant enough to call evolution a fantasy..."

    Ironically, it is only when I came to study evolutioin in depth that it became clear how it is nothing more than just that. Darwinism shouldn't be considered science.

  • @RaizeMusic "it is only when I came to study evolutioin " Was Hovind your teacher? Or did he get his degree at the same "university" as Hovind? Because that would actually explain quite a bit.

  • @ScientificBob Maybe you can try and convince me on how punctuated equilibrium isn't ad hoc, how the fossil record really does support Darwinian evolution,and how random mutations did play a significant role in a macro scale evolutionary process when that idea gets debunked with what we learn in our actual experimentation with biological mutations.Can you convince me to believe in "human evolution" when the rate at which we purportedly evolved is so accelerated,it is as if nature cherry picked?

  • That's thousands of purported "mutations" in thousands of genes in the span of 20-25 million years assigned to our "lineage". That evolution decides to remain in stasis here, but then go speedy Gonzales there? And with humans only? It is you’re prerogative if you wish to “believe” in evolution, just do not accuse me of being a Hovind crony because I do not do the same.

  • @RaizeMusic "That's thousands of purported "mutations" in thousands of genes in the span of 20-25 million years assigned to our "lineage"

    Where did you get those numbers? Did you ever bother to read a decent book about this?  That wasn't written by a bible thumping retard?

  • @ScientificBob "This tree matches PERFECTLY with the fossil record. Without exception."

    The bare "arrangement" of the fossils does not exclusively prove Darwinian evolution is the explanation for biodiversity, especially when considering how the actual trends themselves do not support the Darwinian prediction.

  • “Fast forward thousands of generations and compared to the point of origin, LOTS of changes accumulate.”

    Many changes can accumulate, though none that will compromise the complete anatomical, morphological, and structural identity of the species, yielding an entirely new, indistinguishable one from its predecessor. This idea is mythical genetics-wise, yet it is required for the Darwinian narrative.

  • “Where did you get those numbers? Did you ever bother to read a decent book about this? That wasn't written by a bible thumping retard?”

    Honestly, your prejudice is disgraceful. That info comes from some documents published by EurekAlert back in 04, one coming from a cover story in the peer reviewed scientific journal “Cell”, the other coming from a research team based in the University of Chicago Medical Center.

  • @RaizeMusic "Honestly, your prejudice is disgraceful" Perhaps. But this is youtube.

    Anyway, I can't double check it if you can't tell me anything more specific.

    But honestly, what did those documents have to say about those numbers? Did the authors of the papers have any problem with these numbers? Or is that your own input?

  • @RaizeMusic "The bare "arrangement" does not exclusively prove Darwinian evolution"

    Dude... we are talking about millions and millions of fossils of specimen from hundreds of thousands of species. And not a single one has been found in the wrong place. And it matches every DNA string we examine.

    Are you telling me that this is just a big happy coincidence? Really?

    Millions without ANY contradiction? So how many more do you need before being convinced?

  • @RaizeMusic "Darwinian evolution"

    Unless you are focussing on the Darwinian part. ie, natural selection.

    In that case, I'll just refer you to genetic algorithms.

    All components of mutation and natural selection have been demonstrated, observed, tested like crazy. It works so well that it's pretty much a standard method of optimisation in every problem that can somehow be defined by a datamodel (which represents the DNA in the algorithm logic).

  • @RaizeMusic "how punctuated equilibrium isn't ad hoc" That's actually easy. And if you don't understand it, then there is NO WAY that you actually studied evolution.

    The selection parameters are largely based on the environment (the 'niche' an organism occupies). If the environment stays the same (=equilibrium), the so do the parameters. If the environment changes, so do the parameters. Change the parameters, change the selection. ==> more changes then in 'equilibrium' stage.

  • @RaizeMusic "how the fossil record really does support Darwinian evolution" No fossil has EVER been found in the wrong strata. We NEVER find crabs in the same rock as trilobites. We NEVER find humans in the same rock as dino's.

    DNA is hierachical. We can literally compare two random DNA strings (or even individual genes) and trace the ancestry: drawing a phylogenetic tree.

    This tree matches PERFECTLY with the fossil record. Without exception.

  • @RaizeMusic "random mutations did play a significant role in a macro scale evolutionary process"

    More evidence that you really didn't study evolution theory. There is no "macro evolution theory" and "micro evolution theory". There is only "evolution theory".

    Macro = lots of micro (by defenition).

    DNA is cumulative. Small changes (mutations) are inherited by off spring.

    Fast forward thousands of generations and compared to the point of origin, LOTS of changes accumulate.

  • Comment removed

  • @PeeGeeBeeDee Why do you do it, then?

  • @8698gil Because I Like The Way It Looks, It Stands Out And I Think It's Easier To Read.

  • Making Up Religion* not discovering.

  • @debenni your guess is as good as your ancestors

  • I have watched most of your videos now and particularly love this one. I feel proud that my distant ancestors survived in the most harsh conditions and climatic change through ingenuity and intelligence to become what we are today.

  • @Auckletonline yea like christianity and all that bullshit. oh gosh, there is so much bullshit on this world, i wonder why so many people believe in christianity.

  • Thank you for this video.

  • are these clips part of a movie? i would love to watch it

  • Boobies at 7:05. Sorry. :) One thing - lost fur and developed sweat glands for cooling..? At the same time we developed sub-dermal fat for warmth? I believe a more plausible explanation is that we at some point became semi-aquatic. Just a thought...

  • your Idea of pussy is a rotten butthole to stick yer wee wee in".thats yer logic"...

  • dick measuring conetest! in a cone it's jer bone AYE AYE!

  • you should trace the existence as far back as before the dawn of time

  • you should have sex with a monkey and then we can find out if the monkey will get pregnant? that will answer some of these questions.has anyone ever tried that?,,(scientist?)

  • @dewycatt2112 See definition of a species and you will have your answer

  • @dewycatt2112 : Say what? Absolutely ridiculous, hasn't got a clue about genetic requirements for reproduction. I bet you've been tempted. Pussy is pussy according to your logic.

  • the only "TRUE" religions are Buddah and Confusious"!.. every other religion is a man made Pagan religion that is Organised from governments and teaches that if you dont obey you will have consequences"...go study Propaganda!

  • Your excuse will always be.."Well god created or did that"..The "REAL" question is.."where did god(your god)come from-who created him?)and dont reply with "He always was"! thats a cheap cop out answer! you seem to know exactly how everything else plays out in order,so you can explain this one as well!..

  • continued. . so why can't humans come from the same ancestors apes and monkeys come from. There's millions of years to change. The dogs have transformed into different breeds with much shorter time because humans domesticated them and bred them. And come to think of this, you think people back in history think other humans with very different looks are same as them, same Homo sapiens. Why we look more like today is because of the mixing of races.

  • those who does not try to even think of evolution well think of this, dogs are of different shapes and sizes, some are very small, and some bigger than humans. They look so different that if some people haven't seen other breeds they won't think their dogs. But they still are. Canis Familiaris is their name whether Chihuahua, or German Shepherd. They can reproduce and have grandkids which different species can't have like breeding tiger and lion(which can have offspring but not grand offspring)

  • @Auckletonline Please watch full series of explanation of how evolution works before commenting. We don't come from monkeys, we evolve from the ancestors of bought monkeys and apes and their not called that.

  • I'm no professor of Religion or Science but just think of this, I believe in the Creation story but far different from the others. What is written in the Bible is of course man's observation. Of course the dinosaurs are not in the story because probably the writer of Genesis does not know anything about those huge creatures. People just can't say evolution is a myth because they believe in the bible. The Bible not literal so don't take words with deep meanings literally. .

  • @Auckletonline then wat do u belive in? gods??

  • yes" many humans are just Ignorant! not wanting to except the facts"."oh, god still did that".thats what they say.Just always an excuse!. Dinasaur Fossils are "REAL" religion and man cannot except that our life here is the only life and none after".so they cling to a reason(belief) that makes them feel good! the bible is called History"..life before that is called PreHistoric! bible believers dont believe in Prehistory!.

  • @Auckletonline y'know the REALLY *interesting* thing is how a brain dead fucking moron like you can even figure out how to turn on a computer and then type out such ignorant drivel...my money says any primate has a higher IQ than you moron

  • kind of offensive how the actors in the video cocked thier heads like chickens. ape movements are more fluid and smooth. the actors were obviosly trying to mimic monkeys even though they were supposed to act like apes. sorry, but the awsome prosthetics don't hide the bad acting.

  • @Auckletonline WOW, Fantasy, I hope you'er talking about the Bible fables.

  • @Auckletonline Troll harder.

  • @Auckletonline Unintentional comedy at its finest.

  • I am atheist.Question for you dumb god lovers. the bible says god created man in his own image.the first man was apelike as seen here in this video.so your god was an ape?

  • @dewycatt2112 Hi!

    Just to say that they don't believe in evolution, so, first, they believe their god created both humans and apes in the same time! And, second, some in their group believe that the universe is 6000 years old or so, now, imagine what they say when confront to dinosaurs bones! For lots of them, dinosaurs ends real soon in history, and shared earth with humans!

    Now, proofs tells another story, but they just don't want to think about it, and keep reading only 1 book!

  • @dewycatt2112 Btw, muslims have the same thoughts, but they don't give time like christians! All they do is to try to fix their beliefs and their book in way to make it looks like real and "modern" in 2012! To achieve that, they take modern discoveries, but old ones too, and they say that what is writen in their Quran totally match modern technologies or discoveries! They take like 3 words, and make it a divination phrase! Less educated people fall in that lie, and defend it! Crazy

  • @dewycatt2112

    sorry bro, but man is Homo Sapien so that means God has created man through evolution of prehistoric apes. They can't appear from the sky or things like that.

  • @Auckletonline aparently you can't handle the proof.

  • @Auckletonline you mean fantacies like the "bible stories" that you indulge in?

    

  • What are your thoughts on the aquatic ape theory? Many anthropologists reject it but studies done by marine biologists support the hypothesis. Practically every hairless mammal is aquatic (the exceptions being elephants, hippos etc which are often engaging in aquatic environments). Humans are among the only land mammals with fat attached to their skin, making them more streamlined for swimming (sea lions and whales also have fat attached to their skin). Bipedalism allows humans to enter deep

  • @cosmonautiks water and be able to breathe due to their upright stance. Also aquatic births are much safer due to the fact that babies have a lessen risk of breathing in fecal matter and developing aspiration pneumonia. Also it has been noted that newborns reflexively hold their breath (hence doctors slapping the bottoms of babies) and make instinctual rhythmic movements to propel themselves as if they were born underwater.

  • @Auckletonline Can you prove that fairies don't exist? See, that's not how logic works.

    But tell me why and how evolution was created. I'm interested to know.

  • @Auckletonline Go on.

    This should be interesting.

  • @Auckletonline

    You could cut the irony with a knife on this comment...

  • @DiscoveringReligion 'cut the irony with a knife'? really? i suspect my opinion is the same as yours in regards to this douchebag, but that's the best you could do? wow.

  • @ChuckNumans

    Dude, I get people trolling my videos on a daily basis. When I see something of mild interest, I will comment on their stupidity, but I am not going to throw around obscenities or engage pointless debate with someone ignorant enough to call evolution a fantasy. I am on youtube for elevated discourse, not a dick measuring contest.

  • @DiscoveringReligion Is there a specific movie or specific movies that you gathered these clips from? I'd be interested to see them in their original forms as well as this excellent condensed one.

  • @sadiew1990

    Thanks a lot. I took much of the information and source material found in this video from the series "Walking with Cavemen", produced by the BBC. The entire "Walking" series is really good. You should also try to find "Walking with Dinosaurs". In episode 12 I used clips from "Neanderthal", also a BBC production.

  • @ChuckNumans srsly ChuckFuck, you might consider education, it just might cure your profound ignorance, moron

  • @oneirishpoet poor troll 0/10

  • @PerennialParagon

    Then please do so, send your citations to my inbox.

  • People who use terms like "Darwinism, and "evolutionist" are creationists who are so wrapped up in their fantasy of being children forever cared for by an invisible being that they refuse to see what the truth is, because it would shatter their childish beliefs.

  • @PerennialParagon

    LOL. Yeah, right. Do you know something the rest of the scientific community doesn't? You better go collect your Nobel Prize for disproving Evolution. By the way, I am curious as to what is the alternative method by which humans naturally appeared within nature? Oh that's right, if you're a creationist you believe it was magic. Good luck measuring mythology with scientific instruments.

  • @DiscoveringReligion Yeah we know something the rest of the atheist scientific community doesn't want to know cos they don't get praised anymore if they say we were created, nobody would praise them anymore! They have hijacked a theory which they use as a tool to fool the masses, gets fooled who gets fooled but not me! I don't buy the nonsense that fish grew wings and started flying, and don't use the "took millions of years" for that to happen cos it doesnt make sense

  • @MrCobra811

    "fish grew wings and started flying" Is that what you think the theory of evolution states? Go back to 5th grade and get an education. Yes, it's just one big conspiracy. There are over 2 billion Christians, with a over a 90% majority in the United States, and somehow the Christians keep getting persecuted! You poor little things. There is always some kind of a big bad conspiracy against you poor, persecuted Christians, isnt there? LOL.

  • Are we the first smartest species on the world!?

  • @DarkLance15 we are a smart species?

  • @Aanthanur Actually ya we are the smartest species in the world. Its just that the evolution starts from apes to humans.

  • I heard a funny statement. Man rose to see over the savannah... or pee over the savannah.

  • Another incredible discovery by Science! Not many people know this. About a year ago, it was found through genetic testing and sequencing, that Europeans have Neanderthal genes in them. Before it was thought that Neanderthal could not mate with other hominid species, or if they could, they would have infertile offspring. Turns out, they made Europeans.

  • @5rooker You are asking the wrong person. Ask God.

  • evolution is false. Never happened.

  • @darkfur35

    Well, gee, there goes 150 years of evidence to the contrary. Congratulations, you better go collect your Nobel Prize!

  • @DiscoveringReligion you mean misinterpreted evidence.

  • @darkfur35

    No, I mean peer reviewed scientifically verified evidence across the spectrum of every field of study, from astronomy to genetics. But I guess it's just a global conspiracy so scientists can deny God. Yep, that's makes WAY more sense. I typically base my beliefs on conspiracy theories, superstition, and magic as well.

  • @DiscoveringReligion Your mind is locked in a box. Why would anyone believe in the superstiion & magic of evolution.

  • @darkfur35

    The mechanism by which populations adapt and change over vast periods of time is supported by cold, hard facts from the fossil record, from biology concerning homologous structures and vestigial organs, conserved cellular processes such as oxidative phosphorylation, a universal genetic code of all plants and animals, the anatomical and genomic similarities of related species, and more. You're explanation for the diversity of life is, "God dunnit!" Which one sounds like magic do you?

  • @DiscoveringReligion

    That dude is trolling you, or if not, is so ignorant, he's not worth your effort.

  • modern humans can only evolve once religion ends permanently

  • @iDR1FT DRIFTER

  • Walking with Cavemen in 9 minutes. Unfortunately the show is biased towards certain ideas. E.g. Homo heidelbergensis is the name for the "splitter" view of Archaic Homo sapiens, whereas the "lumper" view promotes a regional transitional Archaic H. sapiens. Also opinions differ over whether Homo erectus was one widely dispersed species, or two separate species - one being H. ergaster. Its still an informative series though.

  • did any austral species have orgasms? im curious as to when in our evolutionary chain did that phenomenon develop?

  • God created us perfect with pseudogenes for a tail and perfect birds with pseudogenes for reptilian teeth. Pseudogenes are a perfect way of trolling scientists, cause they are indoctrinated by satan.

  • dude you just dod my history project thanks

  • Is the world really millions of years old? No!! all the experiments that say so are just based on research in labratory by scientist that were indoctrinated by their teachers, for instance radometric dating seems good but you never hear about the contaminaton that occurs in those methods, even today!!

    Any farmer will tell you that it dosent take a long time to get varieties, its amazing and it dosent take long, look at your kids.

  • Who made this video? If they know so much then they must be the smartest person in the world,

    Have you noticed they never used the word theory in video, Everything about this video is theroredical and speculative,

    God made us just as bible say's, If we been around for millions of years then we woulld have more evidence, but we only have evidence of about 6 thousand years worth, even our current pop could easily come from 8 people who came out noahs ark about 4500 years ago.

  • @jurnagin

    I made this video. I see by your profile picture that you are African American. Let me ask you a question, do you believe the first humans were black or white?

  • @DiscoveringReligion Good question, I dont know and it dosent matter, I believe in the Bible therefore we are all descendents of Noah's family his 3 sons and their wifes, well remember God destroyed world cause of corruption but favored Noah, but what about his wife and in laws how did they look? they were anscesters to everyone today but I believe Adam and Eve were nothing like us today, We look like deformed animals comp[ared to them, they were made by God, but we are just descendents.

  • @jurnagin lol thats a nice way of side stepping a question. The fact is that your Christian religion always portrayed Adam and Eve as a white people. Evolution correctly says that our ancestors were colored from Africa. As they migrated out of Africa into other continents there skin color changed due to either cold or hot weather over thousands of years. Evolution has been proven and it works man! So the score is....Science 1, invisible man in the Sky 0. Booyah!!

  • @NewUser21111 We are partial descendents of Adam and eve, and their race was unlike anythig that we see today,and we are partial descendent of humans,fallen angels, and animals,

    First you have to prove cosmic,Chemical,Steller,Oganic­, and Macro evoloution, nobody's done it, Now we do have variations within kindsof animals, any farmer will tell you thats possible, but your using Micro evoloution to support the other types, thats a classic athest's desception, see Im well educated.