Sachin Tendulkar 175 off 141 Balls 5 Sixes & 14 fours VS Australia -

[rahuls1s]

Did India LOSE THIS MATCH????

[khanabdullah7]

loool India ended up loosing this match, even when Sachin played an amazing innings

[pavancool29]

We Sachin are putting lot of pressure on Sachin for his 100th 100.I request all my Brothers(every Sachin fan is my brother) not to pressure on him so that he may fell easy & break all his records.

[mrshaunakk]

this was the best inning played by sachin!

[shubroto81]

in my opinion this was even better than his 200

[hamedmohd88]

Master At his Best!!

[8008844195]

Sachin is great

[rohan6290]

well sachin is man who fuck the whole australian team alone. He is a man who talks with his bat.

the australians only know how to do sledging nd all . the australians only can watch sachin fucking their asses .

[shark8789]

What a superb innings from Tendulkar. Hopefully he can pick his 100th century at Adelaide.

[100Gilly1]

sachin is awesome!!

[livefreealws]

Brilliant inning from Sachin Tendulkar. He is born genius. He was batting in this match as he used to bat before 2004. He was dominating the bowlers.

[jedigujjar01]

very great inning of tendolkar but he is not one hand winning player

[ThePC3D]

Another paki scumbag!!! Listen u fag and get it straight tendulakar is a class act and the best batsman of current times! Now shut the fuk up nd watch ballers gettin staughtered by him!!! esp the pakis

[9909ritvik]

i just don understand y ppl hav problem with only tendulkar..tellme on innings of sehwag or lara or ponting like this while chasing a target of 350 plus single handedly..it is easy to sit on ur sofa sets in india or usa or australia and just pas a fuc king comment on anyone..imagine to chase a target of 350 plus single handedly at the age of 37..against australian tactics and aus fielding..

[harsharay1]

god scored half of the target required... when the other humans can't score the remaining half..... pity!!!

[livefreealws]

Only jealous and blind people can not see Sachin's greatness.

[livefreealws]

Sachin is the best batsman of all times. Watching the beauty of his batting when he is in flow gives much much more pleasure than watching the best scenes of nature or listening to best music ever or orgasm. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . He is the blessing of God to the cricket world. He is an avatar of God.

[salmankhan517]

Not a match winner... LUNDULKAR

[sushsha]

This was an innings which almost costed Australia the match... I still remember watching this match... Stood up automatically in respect for this man, as he walked back to the pavillion after being caught.. Such a classy player!!

[rajul1993]

Pull Shot to Watson.........AWSUM!!!

[rishabhaba]

whenever he has scored a century there has been a let down by others

such comfortness he provides!!!

[premelectrix]

Intentions decide a man's position in life.... Sachin's intention is always only one, "to fight for the nation in the cricket field".... and thats is why he is still in the pitch for more than 22 years...

[Sachin124000]

i think u just started to see cricket matches... india dint loose in 40 out of 51 test centuriest made by sachin... and in oneday internationals 33 out of 48 india dint loose.....

sachin is not like inzy who is kicked out of team...and he would not be that... he is god here... got it..

[tuscantan4]

@Sachin124000 He's only God in your country. We own the best player ever. Bradman.

[SacgBro]

@tuscantan4 If you think you OWN the finest Australian in cricket, then God save you. This is not the way to describe a champion. Grow up dude. :-)

[tuscantan4]

@SacgBro I'm sorry but when your 'god' was needed during boxing day he got out again at a big moment. Bradman was at his best at crucial moments. He is better than tendulkar by a long way.

[SacgBro]

@tuscantan4 I did not comment on your God Bradman. I commented on your stupid comment of owning him. My voice was directed towards you and not Bradman. Just by dragging Tendulkar in this conversation, you show your insecurity about Bradman. He only played against one or two nations; on 7-8 grounds. There was no McGrath, Donald, Akram, Ambrose, Murali or Warnie in that period. Those bowlers must have been good but not as great as what we had when Sachin was on top. Again, grow up. :)

[SacgBro]

@tuscantan4 I respect Bradman, and I do believe he was the finest of his era.But you can't compare him with Sachin who belongs to a different era.Yes, there were uncovered pitches,helmets and big bats,but don't forget; there was not such pressure that we see today, no big totals to chase, no video analysis, no strategies. One body line was enough to derail Bradman, do you know how many tactics have been tried against Sachin?I'm not saying he is better, but they shouldn't be compared.

[SacgBro]

@SacgBro I meant no helmets and big bats, apologies for the typo

[tuscantan4]

@SacgBro Bradman is the best player of the game ever. Even during bodyline he averaged over 50 which was Sachins career average. Pressure? Are you stupid? There was pressure everywhere he went. People following him around. Pack crowds in the MCG. No big totals? Are you stupid? he was still playing cricket. No strategies? All the teams did what they could against Bradman. Your excuses suggest you've had too much curry. Go do your diarrhea instead of putting it all over here

[SacgBro]

@tuscantan4 If your big criteria of pressure is crowd,then you just weakened your argument, no cricketer has ever been followed or analyzed like Sachin and if you beg to differ,then it certainly cements your place in world of morons.Strategies?gimme a break, there was no such thing as video analysis at that time,you can strategize all you want,but with the equipments available today,it only gets better. Cont....

[tuscantan4]

@SacgBro What are you talking about? Both bradman and sachin were scrutinized equally. Bradman had the burden of captaincy, Bradman was also more consistent. No video analysis was actually a disadvantage to Bradman. He couldn't improve his game as much as Sachin can now.I see also you just brushed aside bradmans 50 plus average during the bodyline series. That sort of tactic was unusual and never seen by Bradman yet he adapted and still managed to do better than any other batsman.

[SacgBro]

@tuscantan4 How can Bradman and Sachin be scrutinized equally.How many games Bradman played in an year.Was cricket even that competitive at that stage?If Bradman was born today,he would have had some tough time coping to the needs of Tests, ODIs and IPL put together.How many great bowlers can you name from his era?If you do; compare them with McGrath,Warnie,Murali Akram,Ambrose or Donald; you will get the picture. One body line tactic and his average drops to 50%, need I say more?

[tuscantan4]

@SacgBro I'm sorry but let Sachin play on some uncovered pitches and see how he goes.Let him play on pitches that are not roads and see how he goes. Cricket even competitive? Wow thats what happens when you have too much curry in your diet. Of course cricket was competitive. Go ask the people from that era. Um Bradman played first class games and other such games outside of tests. They had to travel by boat which is harder than the planes you see today. Bowlers? Larwood, Verity,Constantine etc

[SacgBro]

@tuscantan4 There you go,you say let Sachin play on uncovered pitches.It clearly shows you are making an assumption about him that he won't succeed in those conditions.How can you be so sure; are you God or something?What does curry have to do with anything?I never called you a hoping Kangaroo; did I?You don't know shit about cricket and you use derogatory remarks to strengthen your pathetic arguments.Again, I never said Sachin was better,its just that they should not be compared.

[tuscantan4]

@SacgBro Its pretty obvious that Sachin is crap on pitches that aren't roads. Look at today. Bradman scored centuries on sticky wickets. I don't know my cricket? Your the ugly little indian who thinks tendulkars 70 was the best innings of the Melb test match. First of all He wasn't in much pressure. Ponting and Hussey were on 4-20 odd. Hussey had to make runs or he was out of the side. So their innings were far valuable than your God. My remarks are fact. Curry and Turbans are in your culture.

[SacgBro]

@tuscantan4 The best Aussie bowler ever,Warnie rates him highest.I would take his word over a nobody Aussie, anyway.Again, I'm not saying Sachin is better, but he should not be compared with Bradman.How many Bradman innings you have seen anyway?What I told you were not excuses but facts, as for me having curry in my stomach, guess you really liked the taste of it a lot.Even in the MCG test, Sachin's 70+ innings was far better than anyone from either side.Go watch the highlights kid.

[tuscantan4]

@SacgBro Well warnie didn't bowl to bradman did he? What you told me was bullshit that meant nothing. Seriously all your 'facts' have been shot down. Are you serious? Wow you really are done. Ricky Ponting and Mike hussey batted better than he did. They batted when there was pressure to win the game. 4 down for like 20 and they managed to save the game. Sachin got out yet again when the game was to be won. Hes reputation as a big game player is not very good.

[SacgBro]

@tuscantan4 Sachin did not play in that era either, how can you judge Bradman better then?Hussey and Ricky batted better than Sachin.Get a life dude, seriously.Go and watch the highlights,you really should.You think its Ricky and Hussey who won the game for Aus.It was fine Aussie bowling that did it.Sachin looked 10 times better than Ricky and Hussey who kept hoping against Indian bowlers.They were plumb LBW during their innings and were given a reprieve. Do you even watch cricket?

[tuscantan4]

@SacgBro I think your turban was covering your eyes. Your the typical one eyed Indian supporter. Ricky made 120 runs in the match. More than Sachin. I'm sorry your pathetic BCCI said they didn't want the DRS so too bad, its not out you can't use that as an excuse. Alot of innings, great innings had some umpiring mistakes in them. Its part of the game. And also if it wasn't for ponting and hussey the fine aussie bowling would of had nothing to bowl at. Stay off the curry. Your talking shit.

[partha123dbr]

Man dont blame sachin......There was no support 4 Sachin in the entire 90s. When the ganguly n dravid arrived India's record changed. No single man can change the fortune of a team. Look at Lara.....

[sharifbacha]

Tendulkar again perishes before taking india to victory. Thats where Steve Waugh, Baven, Inzimam and Lara stand higher than him!!

[SPrasanth1991]

@sharifbacha You have got to be fucking kidding me. I'm willing to bet Sachin has more centuries that have resulted in an Indian victory than any of the four mentioned have overall. And Inzamam, seriously?

[sharifbacha]

@SPrasanth1991: off course, sachin has scored around 50 centuries in ODI's so he is bound to have scored hundreds in which India won matches, BUT he also tops the list of those players who scored centuries in a loosing cause. Most famous are Chennai and this 175 :). Btw Inzi scored around 24 centuries in tests in which only 1 resulted in defeat (against Aus in Adelaide in 1999), that was mainly due to umpire decissions against Justin langer (2nd innings) :p. Keep urself calm man!

[roysafari1984]

@sharifbacha

Hey you seems to be paki??? First get millitants, crazy mullahs and american drones out of your land and Insha allah hindustan will discuss cricket with you begger..

[sharifbacha]

@roysafari1984: why u feel that if i oppose you i need to be a Paki :)? It seems you've got sick mentality!!

Grow up young lad and accept the reality!! Sachin is a good player but NOT a finisher ... FULL STOP :)

- Over and Out

[SacgBro]

@sharifbacha Sachin is an opener; an OPENER, he doesn't need to be a finisher. You have Yuvi and Dhoni in Team for that. Name one opener in world cricket who finishes any game. Even Jayasuriya who was known to play long innings did not do that.

[SacgBro]

@sharifbacha How many centuries Inzy scored against Aus by the way(when you're at it)? Get the facts right and then talk to me. I just can't think of a single innings and Lara, Waugh, Bevan or Inzy played in their whole life which was as classy and good as this. If you do, let me know. Inzy got most of his 100s in sub continent. You can check if you want. He was a great player but comparing him with Sachin is plain stupid.

[sharifbacha]

@SacgBro: Its not about centuries, its about how potent is your inning in the context of a match. You play for WIN, not for individual player. You Indians are always fighting and always hesitant to accept your fault. Why you are like that. Sachin is a good player in your eyes, not in mine. Dont impose your thoughts on me, PLEASE !!

* Now cry out loud :-)

[SacgBro]

@sharifbacha I never mentioned Paki in my comments,did I?But you did mention,Indians.It shows your unconditional hatred towards Indians and thus weakens your argument.Its clear you're doing it to belittle Indians and not Tendulkar.Nobody is imposing any thoughts on you,its a forum where we are entitled to express our feelings.Your mentioning of my nationality clearly shows that you are imposing your stupid beliefs on others. I don't mock you coz you're not Indian, but a moron.

[sharifbacha]

@SacgBro lol, im not a Pakistani :P, I mentioned Indians as 99% indians dont listen to other person (or dont pay attention to "real issue" - like you) !!! Regarding belittling Indians is certainly not the aim. For e.g., I like Mr. Dhoni more than Mr. 10dulkar, as his efforts are more result oriented. Why is the case that you always need an explanatory statement :P. It clearly shows who is a REAL Moron.

* Now cry out even LOUDER :-)

[SacgBro]

@sharifbacha Stop using LOL to make everybody think you have an upper-hand in an argument, ain't working.I never called you a paki; that doesn't mean I thought you're one.Your behavior did suggest so;others have also pointed it out and that's why I chose those words.You used the remark You Indians,which showed how you discriminate on the basis of nationality.MS Dhoni is just an average batsman and will never be in the league of Sachin. Check out his test record and then talk to me.

[SacgBro]

@sharifbacha How can you say 99% Indians don't listen to others?In a country of over a billion people, you managed to talk to 99% population,really?May be those few Indians that you talked to; ignored you which shows your social value to the society.Making flimsy assumptions about a country and its people shows what a great mind you are?Do you still believe anybody would take you seriously anymore?And whats with the stupid Cry Out Loud remark?You're just a bachcha,so grow up kid.:)

[sharifbacha]

@SacgBro yes, i forgot to mention "Our experience". OUR also includes people from other nationalities. May be ur rite, but there is also a possibility that indians in OUR surroundings are all dumb asses :P. And its not about a county, its about people and persons. And the conversation started when you replied on my views regarding a person (named Mr. Tendulkar). When i say "cry out / louder" it means you will again cry louder to prove ur point :), which itself is a proof that who needs lolly-pop

[sharifbacha]

@SPrasanth1991

sorry it was Hobart 2nd test in 1999

[SacgBro]

@sharifbacha Don't embarrass yourself by comparing Sachin with these batsmen;its an ODI innings.He opens while none of these players did that.How many times did they successfully chase a target of 350 plus?Yes, never.There was an innings from Inzy when he tried against India and couldn't.Bevan came to bat at no. 6 and remained not out most of his career, thats why such inflated average.Lara\Waugh are no where near Sachin in ODIs; will not even feature in top 5 batsmen of all times.

[vanlal007]

who won the match anyway'? looks like India but im not sure..

[9873282842]

@vanlal007 Australia Won it..

the rest of the Indian Players were unable to win it.. they actually need spoon feeding from Sachin, who got India too close..