people of ancient times know about dinosaurs/dragons the same way we know about them. through fossils and bones!! why is it so hard to understand that.
@DerektheDuctTape you dont need to be a Paleontology to find bones. some ancient folks probably digged around and found a skull of a dinosaur. they got all freaked out thinking these creatures are still around. so that is how the dragons stories got started.
@blaq7427 the problems with modern people is that they think ancient folks are dumb and dont have any imagination.they are the same as us. if i never seen a mammoth before in my life and dug up thier skeleton. i can easily imagine what they look like when they are alive. i probably would think that they are still alive somewhere. i can easily draw picture of myself riding the mammoth just to show it off to my friends that i have been to places, kinda like what people do on facebook.
@havenht you cant tell how an animal looks just by it's skeleton. If never had any knowledge of mammoths you wouldn't that they had trunks like elephants and neither would ancient people. Plus how do you account for the legends of dragons all around the world going back into antiquity ? How do you account for non fossilized dinosaur remains that was found no too long ago? Just except the obvious--dinosaurs existed with humans and became extinct a lot later than previously assumed.
@blaq7427 if the mammoths skull have tusks and skull similar to the elephant, i can imagine it also have a trunk, like the elephant. its not hard. but u r missing my point. people of ancient time from all over the world found skulls/bones of dinosaur/dragon assume that they are still alive and make up story for it. thats it! we make up story and movies about aliens invading earth all the time. dont you think it is nuts if people in the future think those story/movies are real.
@havenht How can you figure a mammoth has a trunk like an elephant if you have never seen or heard of an elephant? People didnt have movies back then and a legend past down through time had a real purpose .It wouldn't be just purely for entertainment-it was how they remembered their history .
@blaq7427 u are missing my point and arguing just for the sake of making me look wrong. maybe my examples are not good. anyway. i do believe that dragon are dinosaur. i agree with u on that. what i dont agree with u is that u say in order for ancient people to know that dinosaur exist is that they have to lived with them,they have to see them in the flesh. i say people of ancient time can know that dinosaur exist without having to live with them and just by seeing thier bones.
@havenht I'm afraid u r the one who is missing the point. These ancient people , including famous people like Marco Polo and Alexander the Great , give accurate descriptions of dinosaurs. In ancient China they have recipes that uses various dragon body parts and their years r represented by animals . All the animals are well know and exist 2day except for the dragon. Why use a dragon if there werent any?Why would all these people just make up stories?
@blaq7427 u back up ur argument with not facts but by what " he said this" "i read this" those souces are unreliable and dont believe everything u read/heard. i didnt watch the whole video n can tell u most of the stuff in the video are BS.bottomline,just tell me" is it possible for the ancient to know about dinosaurs without having to see them in the flesh and just by thier bones?" that is our arugment, dont wander off somewhere else n try to make me look wrong with unreliable sources
Look...they are not claiming the theory of creation is proved but that it is possible and might be true. They are however dissaproving the evolution theory and its claim that dinosaurs were not around during the time of humans. And they obviously have legitimate clear cut evidence to support their claim. Evolutionists are from the beginning against religion and its beliefs so of course they are going to make an opposing claim. However like said in the video millions of years is to much.
@DerektheDuctTape We know there were dinosaurs from the 160 million years of fossils. Large Dinosaurs stopped making fossils 65 million years ago after the K-T mass extinction event. Is that easy enough for you to understand?
@gregrutz Such a strange assertion: you make a bald assertion with nothing to back it up. It's like "believe me because you're stupid but i'm not going to respond to your arguments". Do you expect a neutral, critical, intelligent observer to to believe that?
@gregrutz You cannot scientifically prove that dinosaurs did not live together with man. Just because no fossil has been found with man and dinosaur living together, does not mean they didn't. How did these ancient cultures all come up with dinosaur drawings, how did they even get the anatomy correct.
I am heart broken for humanity. We are better than this, we don't need to believe in fairy tales anymore.
All these "dragons" are very different looking. Many based on large cats, based on snakes, birds, etc. If we are going to believe in this bullshit, we might as well assume that the pyramids were built by aliens and that earth is being held up by four elephants on the back of a giant turtle, or maybe we should believe in vampires, werewolfs and all that other bullshit.
Another thing... So Noah, dinosaurs, tigers, birds etc. lived in harmony on the ark with enough food for those 40 days and 40 nights... What? Ohhh, god made them all behave themselves or something so he could repopulate the earth? okay. That's totally convincing. You got me there. That makes so much sense now. That has to be true.
@Z9A7X2O 1. The Bible says that before then they were vegetarians. 2. It's a mathematical fact that they could feed all the animals, since some would hibernate. See, your assumptions are Biblically inaccurate, when you put it the way you do, and view it from the perspective you do, which is wrong, then it doesn't make sense now does it? No.
@Christistruth1 This is also given that there was a noah or arc to begin with which is something else I don't go with but lets leave that for the moment. Building an arc, no not impossible. Building one big enough for every pair of animals in existence is. Hmm only a few? Why only a few and how then do we have the millions of different animals, bugs etc today?
@wraith168 No, it's not, it is mathematically possible. To fit only two pares of each, but not all dogs needed to go, only two pairs of one kind of Dog, not every kind of Dog. We have them because they populated the earth, I mean honestly take two rabbits and guess what, in less than a year you will have a lot.
@Christistruth1 Ok I was going to respond to this but there is just no way we are going to see eye to eye. You take the bible as the absolute truth. I could throw dates and evidence at you that would directly disprove the idea of a great flood but I can see it wouldn't be any use. As for your math, I am sure you can come up with the math that would show your point of view as viable and I could do the same to show it isn't. It won't get us anywhere. You go by faith and I go by knowledge.
@wraith168 It is absolute truth, and not once has it been refuted, in fact, it's historically accurate, archeologically accurate, scientifically accurate. No one has debunked it's claims to say it has is ridiculous. Go ahead throw our dates and evidence, every culture in the world speaks of it in it's histories, there is geological evidence of a great flood, heck , even the fossils prove the great flood, since nothing can fossilize without compression.
@Christistruth1 It is far from an absolute true. As for it not being refuted, it has never been proven. How is the flood story historically accurate? When exactly did this flood happen? Many cultures may have some kind of flood story. That doesn't mean that the only possible reason for it is that there had to be a great flood. Most human populations live need water sources (rivers or coast) and can have severe floods. Ancient people come up stories about floods then.
@Christistruth1 In every corner of the scientific community the subject is considered to be pseudoscience. There has been many hypotheses put out there by creationists but they have all been explainable within science. This is the same for the geological evidence. If you want to go with time frame, the Egyptians have continuous historical records for hundreds of years before and after the time of the flood that make no mention of a great flood.
@Christistruth1 There are many ancient structures around prior to the flood don't show any signs of ever being under water. How about the amount of water needed for the flood and where did it go? The atmosphere holds enough water for about an inch of water worldwide. To cover even Mount Ararat, where Noah's Ark supposedly landed after the flood, in 40 days would require over 400 feet of water per day. And Everest would require 725 feet per day-that's 30 feet of water per hour. It doesn't add up.
@Christistruth1 If you want see the flood story as a parable used to teach a lesson then fine go with it, but if you want to say it's all true, well it just doesn't hold water ;)
@wraith168 It does hold water, you're assuming your mathematics based on the current know water on the earth, you can't know that. In fact, truth is large bodies of water were discovered under ice caps. Russian scientists using "ice radar" and artificial seismic waves have discovered a vast warmwater lake under their Antarctic base. PLUS all the ice itself and still water from within the earth we STILL don't know about.
@wraith168 Genesis 7:11 that ‘all the springs of the great deep burst forth’. It’s likely that this water came from the earth’s mantle. Geologists calculate that the rocks in the mantle still contain within their mineral structure enough water to fill the oceans at least ten times over. The water kept rising on the earth for five months and eventually covered all the high mountains (Genesis 7:19). ;)
@Christistruth1 Sorry quoting the bible doesn't hold water here. There isn't enough water above, on or below the earth surface to cover all land masses. Where do you think all this water is hiding? Seriously, tell me you don't really believe this. Please tell me the ;) means you don't really believe water just magically appeared from no where...
@wraith168 "Sorry quoting the Bible doesn't hold water here." Sure it does, since you asserted that only the RAIN covered the earth, AND I'M CORRECTING you, because the Bible never says it. So fail there again too. "or below the earth surface to cover all the land masses." How do you know? You don't lolol. AGAIN..."Geologists calculate that the rocks in the mantle still contain within their mineral structure enough water to fill the oceans at least ten times over." cont....
@wraith168 "Where do you think all this water is hiding? Seriously, tell me you don't really believe this." Seriously, are you telling me that you are denying the science that confirms that there's water in the earths mantel enough to cover the world along with flooding and rain?? No, I don't believe water magically appeared, because that's not what it says, but I'm going to do you a favor, I'm going to educate you ...cont...
@wraith168 Collapse of a thick water-vapour canopy which surrounded the pre-Flood earth high in the atmosphere. Calculations indicate this could not have held much water, but it may explain some. Jets of water shooting high into the atmosphere from under the earth and falling back as rain. Intense cyclones called hypercanes that developed over warm ocean water (heated by underwater volcanic eruptions). cont...
@wraith168 Water dumped on the earth by a swarm of comets. The craters on the moon point to an intense solar system bombardment, and some creationists suggest this happened during the Flood. All of these could have happened, and all together, therefor making it highly likely, considering the structure of the earth now, it all fits. You just don't want to believe it.
@Christistruth1 Ok this is really reaching. Can you give some proof of this theory? Sure there are craters on the moon. Over millions of years the moon has been hit by meteors. If a a swarm of comets hit the earth all at once (the chances of one hitting earth is astronomical) then a flood would be the least of earths worries. And again there is no evidence that any swam of comets hit earth. I think we can probably end this discussion. It's obvious no reasonable facts will be acceptable to you.
@wraith168 A large commet would be astronomical, but small ones? It was a catastrophic even that took place, wasn't it?? Sure there is, "At the southern end of Madagascar lie four enormous wedge-shaped sediment deposits, called chevrons, that are composed of material from the ocean floor. Each covers twice the area of Manhattan with sediment as deep as the Chrysler Building is high. cont.....
@wraith168 cont...On close inspection, the chevron deposits contain deep ocean microfossils that are fused with a medley of metals typically formed by cosmic impacts. The explanation is obvious to some scientists. A large asteroid or comet, the kind that could kill a quarter of the world’s population, " New York Times. It may not have been swarms of comets. We can end this discussion, you've provided nothing but your own skepticism for evidence. You gave me no reasonable facts. Bye
@wraith168 "There are many ancient structures around prior to the flood don't show any signs of ever being under water." That's funny, because how do you know when the flood occurred?? The Bible never says. It's only speculated, and I'm not going to assume that. The Bible never said that it was only rain water, but water from within the earth as well. It does if you take into account water from within the earth, that you don't even know about yet. ;)
@wraith168 Oh and by the way, hope you had a great Thanksgiving. Why hypothesis are those? Now, you're using Egyptian historical records to validate your argument and say.."They have continuous historical records for hundreds of years before and after the time of the flood." How do you know this? The Bible NEVER says when the flood took place. cont..
@Christistruth1 I am just giving an example of one culture that doesn't seem affected by a world wide flood is all. A culture that wasn't wiped of the face of the earth. I get the time from for the so called great flood from what young earth creationists have calculated it to be. I figured you took the bible as literal and therefore went with the idea that the world is 6000 to 10000 yrs old. If you would like to put a time frame on when the flood might have happened I would be happy to hear it.
@wraith168 The problem is the Bible never says when the flood occurred so even if you say, it doesn't support a global flood, you would have to know when the flood occurred FIRST. So fail there."A culture that wasn't wiped off the face of the earth." Of course not, because then the flood would have to have taken place BEFORE, so that they could come into existence. I never said the earth was 6k yrs old, not even the Bible says that. I'm not going to put a time frame around it, because Idk.
@wraith168 cont...Again, I'm not going to put a time frame around it because I would still be assuming and you would try to formulate your argument around that and you can't do that either, since the Bible never says.
@Christistruth1 Of course you won't (can't) put a time frame to it. If you did that you know it would be easy to disprove. Actually hearing someone of faith say idk is refreshing and the most honest thing I've heard so I give you credit on that one. Really though I don't need a set time frame for the flood story. You can take the Australian Aborigines as another people that have a continuous history and were never wiped off the planet. They go back roughly 50000 yr.
@Christistruth1 cont... Aborigines are the oldest continuous population outside Africa, to have longest occupied their traditional territory. They predate the ancient Israelites and therefore would have been around long before Noah walked the earth and still exist today.
@wraith168 I can't because I would be speculating, that doesn't disprove anything, you're trying to assert it does. "If you did that you know it would be easy to disprove." WHAT?? I can't put a time frame on it, because NOBODY KNOWS, the Bible NEVER SAYS. That's just stupidity on your part, wow what a stupid accusation. I never said I believed in on faith, there's other evidence that supports it. Who says that a date is required??? NOBODY.
@Christistruth1 Your right this is ridiculous. You can put a timeline on a culture and a people. But none of that matters. You refuse to look at anything that remotely corresponds to reason. Swarms of comets, water pouring from the center of the earth, etc. There is no proof for anything you have come up with. Every time I dispute one thing you throw something else out there reaching further and further from reason. It was amusing discussing it to a point but it isn't keeping my interest.
@wraith168 You can ASSUME or ESTIMATE a timeline on a culture and people, but not with everything. "You refuse to look at anything that remotely corresponds to reason." Reason? You think your reason is better than mine? Wow talk about subjective and arrogant. It could have been any of these things, you don't know, you just doubt. Sure there's proof, I just gave you proof, even if it wasn't a swarm of comets. You haven't thrown anything, you're just throwing around your skepticism. cont..
@wraith168 cont.."It was amusing discussing it to a point it isn't keeping my interest." You haven't challenged me the whole time, you were boring from the get go. Sorry kiddo, goodbye.
@Christistruth1 So boring that you kept reaching from one weak senseless straw after another. I truly hope you are trolling. It's a sad state when your country produces those that turn a total blind eye to anything close to reason. You cut and paste ridiculous crap from creationist web sites. Stuff that has been refuted time and again. Some of which is so ridiculous that it's hard to believe anyone above 5 would believe it. Aw well cupcake ignorance is bliss enjoy yours.
@wraith168 You haven't refuted them, just denied them based on your skepticism. You still haven't given me anything. I thought you were finished? No, you're trolling, you said goodbye to me how many times? And yet you keep coming back. Yeah, yeah, yeah, all you got left is your attack on my intellect, desperate and sad. You follow atheistic naturalistic websites, so? You haven't refuted anything. I'm not ignorant, I'm just not narrow-minded like you kiddo. Go home and play, goodbye.
@wraith168 "You can take the Australian Aborigines as another people that have a continuous history and were never wiped off the planet." Well of course, because they came AFTER the flood. (pounds head on table.) "They go back roughly 50000 years." Okay? You still can't ascertain when the flood took place, you can only logically assume it happened before that. This is ridiculous.
@wraith168 Egyptians described Ten Shining Ones who ruled consecutively before the Deluge***. Like the Bible also says, these pre-Flood patriarchs lived much longer than we do, and this was confirmed by the ancient historians Berosus, Nicolaus of Damascus, Hesiod, Plato, Hecataeus, Mochus, Hieronymus, and Manetho. The last of these kings in the aforementioned lists was the hero who led seven others aboard a vessel in which they survived the global Flood.
@Christistruth1 Aw had some time to kill before going and hanging out with the family for thanksgiving :). And not worried about anything. Just answering a comment. Hope you had a good thanksgiving. Take care.
@wraith168 Okay, great. "How is the flood story historically accurate?" He have accounts in every culture of it. It's in geology as well. "When exactly did this flood happen?" I don't know, the Bible never says. That's kind of a dumb question. "That doesn't mean that the only possible reason for it is that there had to be a great flood." You can't just throw out what cultures who have never met agree on. Now, you're just assuming their mislead. (rolls eyes)
@wraith168 cont...This video even proves a great flood. Math doesn't lie, it's the only absolute truth in science. I go by knowledge as well, my faith is trust in the knowledge I have obtained, it's not blind faith like yours, you just call your blind faith knowledge, while mine is backed up, by history, archeology, math, and science.
Convincing argument that dragons were real (dinosaurs). I can believe that because there is a considerable amount of history pointing in that direction.
But my problem is that it doesn't prove creationism...
They're just saying some dinosaurs survived up to recent history living with humans and matches up with the accounts in the bible. I can see this a true as well because humans wrote the bible, its history. But this doesn't explain why dinosaur bones are carbon dated millionsofyearsago
@Z9A7X2O hey, i believe that would come from what they were saying about how even when a fresh volcanic eruption happens, if you carbon date the crust that is made it will still say that it is millions of years old when it was just created, and there is proof and eye witnesses that will verify that it was just formed. From what i gather, they were saying that carbon dating is not an accurate measuring system.
@jrichmo4 you're right, they do say that here. i must have missed that section earlier. looks llike they need a better test. But then again this is the only mention ive ever heard of carbon dating not being accurate...
@Z9A7X2O Carbon 14 dating works fine but only goes back 60,000 years so they don't use it to date fossils. The best dating is done on ash layers above and below the fossil.
@Z9A7X2O Carbon dating doesn't do millions of years because carbon 14 decays too quickly, so is irrelevant to this debate. Do you mean potassium/argon dating or another dating?
@jrichmo4 My main argument with this is how they say dinosaurs living with humans prove creationism. Just bc they lived at the same time doesn't mean there is a god. There are many stories in ancient relligion (mythology) all over the world that have dragons and similar monsters but creationists claim that those ancient religions are mthological bc they don't follow the bible and worship their god.
@jrichmo4 In my opinion you could use the same argument that dinosaours existed to back up those so called mythologies. It just seems hypocrytical to me. This would have made a great documentary about dragons, dinosaurs etc. if it wasnt for all the creationism pushing.
@Z9A7X2O Carbon 14 - 12 only goes up to 50,000 years max disregarding it's problem with heat, pressure, and atmospheric phenomenons affecting the dating. If you've actually ever seen a radiometric dating process undergo testing and retesting, you'd know that it never ends with the same dates - you must have a controlled environment like a tomb.
Bones are inferred to be that date by their placement in a geologic column (which itself has many problems - of which some are discuss in the video).
@Z9A7X2O Also your point about both dinosaurs and the Bible obviously correlating because they are both "history" just shows that you don't understand the dissonance between supposed dates of when dinosaurs died off and when the Books of the Bible was written.
Paleontologists and Scholars alike will tell you that recorded human history started at 10K BC at latest and dinosaurs died off 65Mil years ago at the earliest. That doesn't leave room for both of them to live together - that's the point.
Because the dating of the granites is wholly a fraud. Educate yourself in this area and you will see why and how this is so. You have taken something for granted which you base your interpretations from. In other words.. if you do not truly understand what water is comprised of.. how can you then pretend to accurately measure the sea?
@gregrutz they all contradict each other. Some dating methods give a young age(like under 10 thousand years), some a medium age(about 100 thousand yrs - 500 thousand yrs), some and old age(like 100 million years old) , and some even very old age (like a few billion years old) And yes even some methods give a even couple trillion years old. How old is the earth, well how old do you want it to be.
@DerektheDuctTape The earth is 4,545 million years old + or- 2 million years. Modern dating methods 1. Uranium-lead dating method 2. Samarium-neodymium dating method 3. Potassium-argon dating method 4. Rubidium-strontium dating method 5. Uranium-thorium dating method 6. Radiocarbon dating method 7. Fission track dating method 8. Chlorine-36 dating method 9. Luminescence dating methods
@DerektheDuctTape Geologist discovered the earth was old over 200 years ago. Radiometric dating was invented in 1943. Plate tectonice and sea floor spreading was confirmed in 1950's
Radioactive decay does not change just to match the bible.
if we're fucked, we're fucked, get over it. If you're here bitching on youtube you're not getting ready for it so you can't care that much. So save us having to read you're whiny comments and move on
Children and stories LOL Teach them some science and the facts.
Dinosaurs were the dominant terrestrial vertebrates for over 160 million years, from the late Triassic period (230 million years ago) until the end of the Cretaceous period (65 million years ago), when the Cretaceous–Tertiary extinction event caused the extinction of most dinosaur species, except for some birds.
@gregrutz No evolutionist would debate him before he went in because he used Real science to destroy evol. Fairytale and he would embaress them. They couldnt win with Science so they got somone to throw him in jail to try to silence him, wait until he gets out.
@gregrutz Even other creationists (young and old earthers) criticized Kent Hovind, believing that many of his arguments are invalid and thereby undermine their causes. The guy is a quack. If you are going to make someone your poster child, please pick someone else.
@gregrutz I have to agree with coolvideo. Dinosaur collagen and seemingly nucleated red blood cells was found on a supposed 65 million year old fosil, how is this possible? It defies all kinds of logic because while biological material can be preserved under some conditions it is unlikely that they continue to be preserved for millions of years. So like the crooked judges, evolutionist came to the defense of their theory claiming it was bacterial biofilm unfortunately Harvard said it's not true
@gregrutz Moreover, physicist are admitting that the sun can affect the half life of isotopes. Although, it was dino fossils where never dated in the first place one has to think about the reasons why scientist think its an old world. The first would be because of the supposed geological record that says gradualism is what happens vs catastrophes. Gradualism theory is why evolution works, however on earth their are always catastrophic events so I would say take that info with a grain of salt.
@gregrutz Again mass extinctions have nothing to do with evolution, so the 6 great mass extinctions u keep mentioning is nothing but bullshit. Darwin's theory was based on a geologist Charles Lyell model which if you were to at least google and enlighten yourself, you would see that it incorporates the idea of gradualism. The only bullshit here is the ideas your typing on this page. There are indeed evidence for a global flood, what are you smoking? Do you think dinos naturally fossilize?
@HaphazardCrappola What evidence for a global flood? What is the name of the flood mud layer with all the dead bodies in it?
Lyell proved the earth was old which gave Darwin the idea that there was plenty of time for evolution. The Theroy of evolution has nothing to do with lyell or geology.
Geology just proves the earth is millions of years old and there was no flood.
The mass extinctions are part of the fossil record, something you have to deny.
@gregrutz You are such a convoluted mess lol, I'm surprised you actually believe ANYTHING of what you are saying with such a limited understanding science. Lyell never PROVED the earth was old, he postulated that the earth was old. There are no PROOFS in science, as my biology professor said, if you want PROOFS STUDY MATH. The theory of evolution was indeed based on an old earth theory. Without time there is no evolution. The current theory of evolution which incorporates sudden change still
@gregrutz still needs time. Gradualism and punctured equilibrium and is the core to evolution and they STILL REQUIRE AN OLD EARTH. Is that so hard for you to understand? "Mass extinction" "mass extinction" please refrain from writing any papers in the near future because you bring the most asinine examples that don't back anything up. Mass extinction and fossil record have nothing to do with evolution. Mentioning the fossil record does not prove evolution, those where due to catastrophic events
@gregrutz Hilarious. Hilarious. Hilarious. I'm going to stop responding right now, because there is a vast number of information available online for the non biased mind. You are purporting supposed knowledge of geology, than claim that the Earth is 4.5 million years old. Don't you mean Billion? Fossil records don't prove evolution, they show that species can die out. Those are two very different concepts and theory of evolution is not necessary to point out what common sense says can happen.
@HaphazardCrappola Dear Creatard, 4,545 Million years = 4.5 Billion. Are you home schooled?
Fossils show that species LIVED. You can't explain dinosaurs living for 160 Million years.
You can't explain why 98% of all species that ever lived are extinct ! No trilobites, no sabertooth tigers, no mammoths, no Neaderthal Man, no strange marine creatures from the Cambrian Period.
Common sense says heavy things fall faster than light things, read a science book dummy.
@gregrutz that include FLOODS. Moreover, evidence for global flood could be found by actually picking up a geology book. If global warming was indeed a reality and the ice caps would melt, what do you think would happen? What the hell do you think happened during the Ice age? Think sucka.
Excellent video but, of course, the foundational work for this was doen by Kent Hovind who single-handedly put this information before the (decieved evolutionists) public eye.
@wraith168 Even other creationists (young and old earthers) criticized Kent Hovind, believing that many of his arguments are invalid and thereby undermine their causes. The guy is a quack.
a certain 'Mramericanzombie' thinks it is funny to bash people with unintelligent content..provoking other people with the most dreadful things,but keeps his own channel 'unavailable'. A troll type,so you will. Well,youtube,how about it?You are usually quick enough to give out (false) strikes for much less than this.
Darwinism is the real delusion.May God bless you all with His Truth.
Yea, Noah' ark...where it's to small for ceveral millions of species... in Europe... (America didn't exist at that time...it existed when it was discovered by Vikkings, but again, it didn't exist for the rest of the world.)
For the love of Christ..If people would just be able to accept that the earth excists from the day God decided to create it.And that He has the right to put life on it as He pleases.From dragons to aliens.Then we could all enjoy the amazement of His wonders much more,and just be thankful that we have the privelege of His pleasures,and a chance to get even more where that came from through Jesus Christ in heaven one day.God Bless you all.
@StingDrift I don't accept anything that isn't and can't be proven such as the idea that there is some supreme being out playing the game of life with us.
.im guessing most of you people only watched up untill they said the word God then left cuz they give very reasonable PROOF not theory. not a fairytale . most people will believe in whatever a scientist or politician says especially
@coasterfiend05 There are over 250,000 peer-reviewed scientific studies on evolution, with full support from every related life science, including genetics. DNA Code itself proves how all life is related to all life.
There has not been a single falsification to refute evolution in 150 years of relentless scrutiny!
It is the backbone of Biology, accepted by 99.98% of scientists.
Dragons and a global flood are a myth, no eviedence.
@coasterfiend05 There are over 250,000 peer-reviewed scientific studies on evolution, with full support from every related life science, including genetics. DNA Code itself proves how all life is related to all life.
There has not been a single falsification to refute evolution in 150 years of relentless scrutiny!
It is the backbone of Biology, accepted by 99.98% of scientists.
@coasterfiend05 The T-Rex bone you mention was 70 million yrs old. Scientist don't dispute the age of the bone. As for your flood "evidence", there are other more scientific explanations on this. For instance, volcanic eruptions can cover things quickly leaving them "standing straight up". You don't need a world wide flood explanation. Especially when the is no geological evidence for a world wide flood.
Actually no go and put a freshly killed chicken outside and see if it's there in the morning scavengers will pick the carcass clean and the bones decompose very quickly and food for thought they have found plesiosaur like carcasses that have washed up on shore and carcasses in fishing nets
Okay...so they got carvings and statues and stories...where are the unfossilized dinosaur bones? If dinosaurs existed as little as 800 years ago,there should be tons of unfossilized dinosaur bones. If I killed a dinosaur in medieval times,I woulda made it's bones into a helmet or shield or something.
@elbeghast where is Julius Caesars body or bones? where is Alexander the Great's remains? these were great men from history that we knew existed and how? have u ever seen a trillion dollars or held it in your hands? its highly doubtful that you do or did but still we know it exists because we've heard it does...there's so many ?'s and not truthful answers...its called deception...honestly why has certain parts of the bible been censored? not unless there's something to hide...
@Sunspotjohnny26 Wow that's your "logical" argument? Really? We know Caesar and Alexander existed because of multiple corroborating historical sources. I know money exists because I have some. I can touch it, hold it, its there. Does a trillion dollars exist? Maybe, maybe not. You would have to put all the money together and count it out to find out so you don't know it exists but you have some evidence that it might. There is NO evidence of dinos 800 yrs ago.
This was a wonderful expose' on the reality of creationism and of course the fallacy and complete ridiculousness of the THEORY of evolution. Just like any other issue, some people would not believe facts even in the face of them, because they do not want to believe. This kind of bias should NEVER be allowed in our education system. So much for the earth being billions of years old...oh, and thanks to all the ignorant fools who taught this stoopid theory to all those impressionable minds.
In reference to Harizl's comment, I have watched this video 4 times and nowhere can I find where they quoted anything in relation to Sagan second I would say evolutionist are the ones stuck in six grade considering any and all evidence real or imagined by evolutionists has been disproved or dis accounted at sometime or another and any evidence in the future will be disproved, if you can show me one piece of evidence that will prove evolution that hasn't been disproved i will take back my comment
@itzahazylife yes by creationists! for example evolutionist famed discovery neanderthal man, evolutionists found a TOOTH and decided it was a fossil from an early human they then proceeded to draw a picture of what they thought it looked like it was later found to be the tooth of a extinct pig. and what you need to remember is evolution is as much a THEORY as creation its not scientific and its NOT a fact
u are out of your mind and very very misinformed..a theory in science is the highest possible explanation for a natural mystery..it is NOT just a guess. a scientific theory is built by facts and evidence. the theory is what explains and fits in with the facts and evidence. creationism is not science. if it was, it'd be considered a scientific theory BY SCIENTISTS..not creationists pretending to be scientists.
for example..u claim that life is evidence of creation via an intelligence..well, who is this designer?..where is the evidence of the designer? how does he go about designing life? what are the mechanisms of his/her/its design?..what would be the lesson in schools?..god did it?..everything u creationists claim needs an intelligent designer, scientists can explain with blind natural processes.
in reference to your second comment, God is the designer. where is the evidence of your brain there is none but you believe it is there. how does he create life? that's how great God is he only had to create life once and everything is in motion for the future. order is the mechanism of his design. the lessons in school would be to let them decide but show both "theories" lastly so it takes blindness to be evolutionist... ok
there is no evidence of my brain?..are u fucking kidding me?..this is your argument?..and no, creationism is not a scientific theory..i don't think u understand what a scientific theory is in science..it isn't just a guess. it is the highest possible status an explanation can get in science..it is an explanation that fits in with the observable evidence..and evolution does just that. creationism isn't science..it relies on the assumption that god exists.
you must not be reading my comments right, i have stated on multiple posts creationism is not scientific now its time for you to say the same about evolution both are only theories. BOTH take FAITH! But takes less faith to believe God created - than that you came from a monkey... when there are NO fossil records to support evolution. The fossil record supports creation-sorry. The brain comment was - you've never seen/touched/etc. your brain. But I believe you have one! :-) Faith
the 2nd law of thermodynamics says that in a CLOSED system, it will go from order to disorder (entropy)..earth is an OPEN system. earth gets energy from the sun!
- evolution DOESN'T say we came from monkey's.
- why would it to be easier to believe in god when there has never been any evidence ever found that god or gods even exist?
-the fossil record DOES support evolution. creationists are WRONG when they claim it doesn't..read up on WHY..do some RESEARCH.
i don't know what book your reading but every other evolutionist says you came from a ape or ape like early human. this is not a debate about God or even creation this is where you can't prove that evolution is science its JUST A THEORY just admit that and we'll all be happy. no show me a picture of a transitional fossil you should have found billions
@MarkIITrooper Actually it says we have a COMMON ancestors as apes. There is a difference there. And you lack the understanding of what a scientific theory is as opposed to a theory in layman's terms. Those are very different also. A misunderstanding or flat out disregard of what scientific theory is why creationists can rationalize that evolution is only a theory. You need to go look up scientific theory.
the brain thing was STUPID of u to say..there is a huge amount of evidence that a brain is inside of my head..i have seen brains before. i know brains exist.. i have learned from medical science that all human beings have brains. and wouldn't u know, i'm a human being!!!.. i have seen surgeries done on human brains..i'm alive!..and well shit, i need a brain to be alive!..u are a stupid fucking person do u know that?
my point on the whole brain thing was you've heard of other brains you've seen other brains but you can't prove YOU have a brain unless we take it out or do surgery and this is a debate that evolution is not science stick to the facts and apparently you are taking this personally if you can't continue in a mature manner(without cursing) i will stop here
in reference to there being more evidence of your brain than God i agree 100% it was just an example of how to view proof. however, again, evolution is NOT scientific and you cannot prove it through scientific methods because it continues to break SO many scientific LAWS im shocked that you want to quote science only when it is convenient to you but ignore the many scientific laws that evolution breaks.
@itzahazylife I could prove that youtube never existed, if I eliminated every single computer from earth, and blocked all electricity away from this planet, certainly there would be no real prove "youtube exited" except for "eye witnesses". So, if another life form came to earth and where to ask me the question whether youtube ever existed, data would be subject to peoples interpretation, but not to the "data itself"
That is the problem of history, and were evolution fails to understand!
It wasn't too far back that everyone thought the world was flat and i must ask you did that make it any less round, so my point is numbers don't matter, facts and laws do! and evolution breaks most of them like the second law of thermodynamics, all things go from order to disorder, and the law of kinds, one species only gives way to more of it's species, and the law of bio genesis which states life can ONLY come from other life!!! those are scientific laws that cannot be broken!
evolution fits in with all of the evidence found!!!...we have actually witnesses generations of bacteria evolve..we have seen the wolf evolve into all the different breeds of dog..we have seen insects evolve. we have many different types of genetic evidence that we evolved. the fossils are in order. simple life is deeper underground, while more complex life is higher up. there ARE transitional fossils and even LIVING animals displaying transitions.
ty for sharing. ties in really well with the Ancient Alien Theory of humanity, the gene splicing and the like.
dexterriley 2 weeks ago
how dare they question science! Science is the ultimate authority and absolute truth!
unprofessionalvids 2 weeks ago
people of ancient times know about dinosaurs/dragons the same way we know about them. through fossils and bones!! why is it so hard to understand that.
havenht 3 weeks ago
@havenht I don't think any culture use Paleontology at that time.
DerektheDuctTape 3 weeks ago
@DerektheDuctTape Yes you can prove dinosaur died off 65 million years ago.
Yes the fact that there are no fossils of man and dino together mean something.
''how did they even get the anatomy correct'' THEY DIDN'T
You think anything with bumps on it's back is a stegosaurus.
I have seen Ica Stones that show dinos with plates on the front of the neck
gregrutz 3 weeks ago
@DerektheDuctTape you dont need to be a Paleontology to find bones. some ancient folks probably digged around and found a skull of a dinosaur. they got all freaked out thinking these creatures are still around. so that is how the dragons stories got started.
havenht 3 weeks ago
@havenht There cave wall drawings of dinosaurs so that would suggest people lived with them
blaq7427 3 weeks ago
@blaq7427 the problems with modern people is that they think ancient folks are dumb and dont have any imagination.they are the same as us. if i never seen a mammoth before in my life and dug up thier skeleton. i can easily imagine what they look like when they are alive. i probably would think that they are still alive somewhere. i can easily draw picture of myself riding the mammoth just to show it off to my friends that i have been to places, kinda like what people do on facebook.
havenht 3 weeks ago
@havenht you cant tell how an animal looks just by it's skeleton. If never had any knowledge of mammoths you wouldn't that they had trunks like elephants and neither would ancient people. Plus how do you account for the legends of dragons all around the world going back into antiquity ? How do you account for non fossilized dinosaur remains that was found no too long ago? Just except the obvious--dinosaurs existed with humans and became extinct a lot later than previously assumed.
blaq7427 3 weeks ago
@blaq7427 if the mammoths skull have tusks and skull similar to the elephant, i can imagine it also have a trunk, like the elephant. its not hard. but u r missing my point. people of ancient time from all over the world found skulls/bones of dinosaur/dragon assume that they are still alive and make up story for it. thats it! we make up story and movies about aliens invading earth all the time. dont you think it is nuts if people in the future think those story/movies are real.
havenht 3 weeks ago
@havenht How can you figure a mammoth has a trunk like an elephant if you have never seen or heard of an elephant? People didnt have movies back then and a legend past down through time had a real purpose .It wouldn't be just purely for entertainment-it was how they remembered their history .
blaq7427 3 weeks ago
@blaq7427 u are missing my point and arguing just for the sake of making me look wrong. maybe my examples are not good. anyway. i do believe that dragon are dinosaur. i agree with u on that. what i dont agree with u is that u say in order for ancient people to know that dinosaur exist is that they have to lived with them,they have to see them in the flesh. i say people of ancient time can know that dinosaur exist without having to live with them and just by seeing thier bones.
havenht 3 weeks ago
@havenht I'm afraid u r the one who is missing the point. These ancient people , including famous people like Marco Polo and Alexander the Great , give accurate descriptions of dinosaurs. In ancient China they have recipes that uses various dragon body parts and their years r represented by animals . All the animals are well know and exist 2day except for the dragon. Why use a dragon if there werent any?Why would all these people just make up stories?
blaq7427 3 weeks ago
@blaq7427 u back up ur argument with not facts but by what " he said this" "i read this" those souces are unreliable and dont believe everything u read/heard. i didnt watch the whole video n can tell u most of the stuff in the video are BS.bottomline,just tell me" is it possible for the ancient to know about dinosaurs without having to see them in the flesh and just by thier bones?" that is our arugment, dont wander off somewhere else n try to make me look wrong with unreliable sources
havenht 3 weeks ago
Dinosaurs don't breath fire. Dinosaurs lived and changed for 160 million years.
JOB 40:
15 Behold now behemoth
16 His strength is in his loins and his force is in the navel of his belly.
Dinosaurs come from eggs, THEY DON’T HAVE NAVELS.
gregrutz 3 weeks ago
@gregrutz
Dude.. get a clue.. you are reading one of hundreds of ENGLISH transliterations of the Hebrew.
mrtruthify 3 weeks ago
@gregrutz
Ever hear of the word ALLEGORY?
mrtruthify 3 weeks ago
@mrtruthify Every hear the word Paleotologist?
gregrutz 3 weeks ago
Look...they are not claiming the theory of creation is proved but that it is possible and might be true. They are however dissaproving the evolution theory and its claim that dinosaurs were not around during the time of humans. And they obviously have legitimate clear cut evidence to support their claim. Evolutionists are from the beginning against religion and its beliefs so of course they are going to make an opposing claim. However like said in the video millions of years is to much.
MrJavinSr 2 months ago
@MrJavinSr The earth is old, we have know it for 200 years. Evolution was accepted 150 years ago, try and keep up with science.
gregrutz 1 month ago
@gregrutz what is science, how can science prove that no one has seen a dinosaur.
DerektheDuctTape 3 weeks ago
@DerektheDuctTape We know there were dinosaurs from the 160 million years of fossils. Large Dinosaurs stopped making fossils 65 million years ago after the K-T mass extinction event. Is that easy enough for you to understand?
gregrutz 3 weeks ago
@gregrutz Such a strange assertion: you make a bald assertion with nothing to back it up. It's like "believe me because you're stupid but i'm not going to respond to your arguments". Do you expect a neutral, critical, intelligent observer to to believe that?
CalebSchultink 3 weeks ago
@CalebSchultink Do you expect a normal, neutral, intelligent person to believe in dragons, unicorns, talking snakes and global flood myths?
I have science to back up the fact the dinosaurs died of in the last great mass extinction that happened 65 million years ago
gregrutz 3 weeks ago
@gregrutz You cannot scientifically prove that dinosaurs did not live together with man. Just because no fossil has been found with man and dinosaur living together, does not mean they didn't. How did these ancient cultures all come up with dinosaur drawings, how did they even get the anatomy correct.
DerektheDuctTape 3 weeks ago
@gregrutz A unicorn would be just a horse like creature with a horn on it's head.
DerektheDuctTape 3 weeks ago
@DerektheDuctTape And a dragon would just be a fire breathing dinosaur, yea right.
gregrutz 3 weeks ago
I am heart broken for humanity. We are better than this, we don't need to believe in fairy tales anymore.
All these "dragons" are very different looking. Many based on large cats, based on snakes, birds, etc. If we are going to believe in this bullshit, we might as well assume that the pyramids were built by aliens and that earth is being held up by four elephants on the back of a giant turtle, or maybe we should believe in vampires, werewolfs and all that other bullshit.
MisterCommentCritic 3 months ago
Another thing... So Noah, dinosaurs, tigers, birds etc. lived in harmony on the ark with enough food for those 40 days and 40 nights... What? Ohhh, god made them all behave themselves or something so he could repopulate the earth? okay. That's totally convincing. You got me there. That makes so much sense now. That has to be true.
Z9A7X2O 3 months ago
@Z9A7X2O 1. The Bible says that before then they were vegetarians. 2. It's a mathematical fact that they could feed all the animals, since some would hibernate. See, your assumptions are Biblically inaccurate, when you put it the way you do, and view it from the perspective you do, which is wrong, then it doesn't make sense now does it? No.
Christistruth1 3 months ago
@Christistruth1 They could feed all the animals? Really? They couldn't even build an arc big enough for all the animals. It's just not possible.
wraith168 3 months ago
@wraith168 They did build the ark, it's not impossible. They didn't need to build the ark for ALL the animals, only a few of them.
Christistruth1 3 months ago
@Christistruth1 This is also given that there was a noah or arc to begin with which is something else I don't go with but lets leave that for the moment. Building an arc, no not impossible. Building one big enough for every pair of animals in existence is. Hmm only a few? Why only a few and how then do we have the millions of different animals, bugs etc today?
wraith168 3 months ago
@wraith168 No, it's not, it is mathematically possible. To fit only two pares of each, but not all dogs needed to go, only two pairs of one kind of Dog, not every kind of Dog. We have them because they populated the earth, I mean honestly take two rabbits and guess what, in less than a year you will have a lot.
Christistruth1 3 months ago
@Christistruth1 Ok I was going to respond to this but there is just no way we are going to see eye to eye. You take the bible as the absolute truth. I could throw dates and evidence at you that would directly disprove the idea of a great flood but I can see it wouldn't be any use. As for your math, I am sure you can come up with the math that would show your point of view as viable and I could do the same to show it isn't. It won't get us anywhere. You go by faith and I go by knowledge.
wraith168 3 months ago
@wraith168 It is absolute truth, and not once has it been refuted, in fact, it's historically accurate, archeologically accurate, scientifically accurate. No one has debunked it's claims to say it has is ridiculous. Go ahead throw our dates and evidence, every culture in the world speaks of it in it's histories, there is geological evidence of a great flood, heck , even the fossils prove the great flood, since nothing can fossilize without compression.
Christistruth1 3 months ago
@Christistruth1 It is far from an absolute true. As for it not being refuted, it has never been proven. How is the flood story historically accurate? When exactly did this flood happen? Many cultures may have some kind of flood story. That doesn't mean that the only possible reason for it is that there had to be a great flood. Most human populations live need water sources (rivers or coast) and can have severe floods. Ancient people come up stories about floods then.
wraith168 3 months ago
@Christistruth1 In every corner of the scientific community the subject is considered to be pseudoscience. There has been many hypotheses put out there by creationists but they have all been explainable within science. This is the same for the geological evidence. If you want to go with time frame, the Egyptians have continuous historical records for hundreds of years before and after the time of the flood that make no mention of a great flood.
wraith168 3 months ago
@Christistruth1 There are many ancient structures around prior to the flood don't show any signs of ever being under water. How about the amount of water needed for the flood and where did it go? The atmosphere holds enough water for about an inch of water worldwide. To cover even Mount Ararat, where Noah's Ark supposedly landed after the flood, in 40 days would require over 400 feet of water per day. And Everest would require 725 feet per day-that's 30 feet of water per hour. It doesn't add up.
wraith168 3 months ago
@Christistruth1 If you want see the flood story as a parable used to teach a lesson then fine go with it, but if you want to say it's all true, well it just doesn't hold water ;)
wraith168 3 months ago
@wraith168 It does hold water, you're assuming your mathematics based on the current know water on the earth, you can't know that. In fact, truth is large bodies of water were discovered under ice caps. Russian scientists using "ice radar" and artificial seismic waves have discovered a vast warmwater lake under their Antarctic base. PLUS all the ice itself and still water from within the earth we STILL don't know about.
Christistruth1 2 months ago
@wraith168 Genesis 7:11 that ‘all the springs of the great deep burst forth’. It’s likely that this water came from the earth’s mantle. Geologists calculate that the rocks in the mantle still contain within their mineral structure enough water to fill the oceans at least ten times over. The water kept rising on the earth for five months and eventually covered all the high mountains (Genesis 7:19). ;)
Christistruth1 2 months ago
@Christistruth1 Sorry quoting the bible doesn't hold water here. There isn't enough water above, on or below the earth surface to cover all land masses. Where do you think all this water is hiding? Seriously, tell me you don't really believe this. Please tell me the ;) means you don't really believe water just magically appeared from no where...
wraith168 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@wraith168 "Sorry quoting the Bible doesn't hold water here." Sure it does, since you asserted that only the RAIN covered the earth, AND I'M CORRECTING you, because the Bible never says it. So fail there again too. "or below the earth surface to cover all the land masses." How do you know? You don't lolol. AGAIN..."Geologists calculate that the rocks in the mantle still contain within their mineral structure enough water to fill the oceans at least ten times over." cont....
Christistruth1 2 months ago
@wraith168 "Where do you think all this water is hiding? Seriously, tell me you don't really believe this." Seriously, are you telling me that you are denying the science that confirms that there's water in the earths mantel enough to cover the world along with flooding and rain?? No, I don't believe water magically appeared, because that's not what it says, but I'm going to do you a favor, I'm going to educate you ...cont...
Christistruth1 2 months ago
@wraith168 Collapse of a thick water-vapour canopy which surrounded the pre-Flood earth high in the atmosphere. Calculations indicate this could not have held much water, but it may explain some. Jets of water shooting high into the atmosphere from under the earth and falling back as rain. Intense cyclones called hypercanes that developed over warm ocean water (heated by underwater volcanic eruptions). cont...
Christistruth1 2 months ago
@wraith168 Water dumped on the earth by a swarm of comets. The craters on the moon point to an intense solar system bombardment, and some creationists suggest this happened during the Flood. All of these could have happened, and all together, therefor making it highly likely, considering the structure of the earth now, it all fits. You just don't want to believe it.
Christistruth1 2 months ago
@Christistruth1 Ok this is really reaching. Can you give some proof of this theory? Sure there are craters on the moon. Over millions of years the moon has been hit by meteors. If a a swarm of comets hit the earth all at once (the chances of one hitting earth is astronomical) then a flood would be the least of earths worries. And again there is no evidence that any swam of comets hit earth. I think we can probably end this discussion. It's obvious no reasonable facts will be acceptable to you.
wraith168 2 months ago
@wraith168 A large commet would be astronomical, but small ones? It was a catastrophic even that took place, wasn't it?? Sure there is, "At the southern end of Madagascar lie four enormous wedge-shaped sediment deposits, called chevrons, that are composed of material from the ocean floor. Each covers twice the area of Manhattan with sediment as deep as the Chrysler Building is high. cont.....
Christistruth1 2 months ago
@wraith168 cont...On close inspection, the chevron deposits contain deep ocean microfossils that are fused with a medley of metals typically formed by cosmic impacts. The explanation is obvious to some scientists. A large asteroid or comet, the kind that could kill a quarter of the world’s population, " New York Times. It may not have been swarms of comets. We can end this discussion, you've provided nothing but your own skepticism for evidence. You gave me no reasonable facts. Bye
Christistruth1 2 months ago
@wraith168 "There are many ancient structures around prior to the flood don't show any signs of ever being under water." That's funny, because how do you know when the flood occurred?? The Bible never says. It's only speculated, and I'm not going to assume that. The Bible never said that it was only rain water, but water from within the earth as well. It does if you take into account water from within the earth, that you don't even know about yet. ;)
Christistruth1 2 months ago
@wraith168 Oh and by the way, hope you had a great Thanksgiving. Why hypothesis are those? Now, you're using Egyptian historical records to validate your argument and say.."They have continuous historical records for hundreds of years before and after the time of the flood." How do you know this? The Bible NEVER says when the flood took place. cont..
Christistruth1 2 months ago
@Christistruth1 I am just giving an example of one culture that doesn't seem affected by a world wide flood is all. A culture that wasn't wiped of the face of the earth. I get the time from for the so called great flood from what young earth creationists have calculated it to be. I figured you took the bible as literal and therefore went with the idea that the world is 6000 to 10000 yrs old. If you would like to put a time frame on when the flood might have happened I would be happy to hear it.
wraith168 2 months ago
@wraith168 The problem is the Bible never says when the flood occurred so even if you say, it doesn't support a global flood, you would have to know when the flood occurred FIRST. So fail there."A culture that wasn't wiped off the face of the earth." Of course not, because then the flood would have to have taken place BEFORE, so that they could come into existence. I never said the earth was 6k yrs old, not even the Bible says that. I'm not going to put a time frame around it, because Idk.
Christistruth1 2 months ago
@wraith168 cont...Again, I'm not going to put a time frame around it because I would still be assuming and you would try to formulate your argument around that and you can't do that either, since the Bible never says.
Christistruth1 2 months ago
@Christistruth1 Of course you won't (can't) put a time frame to it. If you did that you know it would be easy to disprove. Actually hearing someone of faith say idk is refreshing and the most honest thing I've heard so I give you credit on that one. Really though I don't need a set time frame for the flood story. You can take the Australian Aborigines as another people that have a continuous history and were never wiped off the planet. They go back roughly 50000 yr.
wraith168 2 months ago
@Christistruth1 cont... Aborigines are the oldest continuous population outside Africa, to have longest occupied their traditional territory. They predate the ancient Israelites and therefore would have been around long before Noah walked the earth and still exist today.
wraith168 2 months ago
@wraith168 I can't because I would be speculating, that doesn't disprove anything, you're trying to assert it does. "If you did that you know it would be easy to disprove." WHAT?? I can't put a time frame on it, because NOBODY KNOWS, the Bible NEVER SAYS. That's just stupidity on your part, wow what a stupid accusation. I never said I believed in on faith, there's other evidence that supports it. Who says that a date is required??? NOBODY.
Christistruth1 2 months ago
@Christistruth1 Your right this is ridiculous. You can put a timeline on a culture and a people. But none of that matters. You refuse to look at anything that remotely corresponds to reason. Swarms of comets, water pouring from the center of the earth, etc. There is no proof for anything you have come up with. Every time I dispute one thing you throw something else out there reaching further and further from reason. It was amusing discussing it to a point but it isn't keeping my interest.
wraith168 2 months ago
@wraith168 You can ASSUME or ESTIMATE a timeline on a culture and people, but not with everything. "You refuse to look at anything that remotely corresponds to reason." Reason? You think your reason is better than mine? Wow talk about subjective and arrogant. It could have been any of these things, you don't know, you just doubt. Sure there's proof, I just gave you proof, even if it wasn't a swarm of comets. You haven't thrown anything, you're just throwing around your skepticism. cont..
Christistruth1 2 months ago
@wraith168 cont.."It was amusing discussing it to a point it isn't keeping my interest." You haven't challenged me the whole time, you were boring from the get go. Sorry kiddo, goodbye.
Christistruth1 2 months ago
@Christistruth1 So boring that you kept reaching from one weak senseless straw after another. I truly hope you are trolling. It's a sad state when your country produces those that turn a total blind eye to anything close to reason. You cut and paste ridiculous crap from creationist web sites. Stuff that has been refuted time and again. Some of which is so ridiculous that it's hard to believe anyone above 5 would believe it. Aw well cupcake ignorance is bliss enjoy yours.
wraith168 2 months ago
@wraith168 You haven't refuted them, just denied them based on your skepticism. You still haven't given me anything. I thought you were finished? No, you're trolling, you said goodbye to me how many times? And yet you keep coming back. Yeah, yeah, yeah, all you got left is your attack on my intellect, desperate and sad. You follow atheistic naturalistic websites, so? You haven't refuted anything. I'm not ignorant, I'm just not narrow-minded like you kiddo. Go home and play, goodbye.
Christistruth1 2 months ago
@wraith168 "You can take the Australian Aborigines as another people that have a continuous history and were never wiped off the planet." Well of course, because they came AFTER the flood. (pounds head on table.) "They go back roughly 50000 years." Okay? You still can't ascertain when the flood took place, you can only logically assume it happened before that. This is ridiculous.
Christistruth1 2 months ago
@wraith168 Egyptians described Ten Shining Ones who ruled consecutively before the Deluge***. Like the Bible also says, these pre-Flood patriarchs lived much longer than we do, and this was confirmed by the ancient historians Berosus, Nicolaus of Damascus, Hesiod, Plato, Hecataeus, Mochus, Hieronymus, and Manetho. The last of these kings in the aforementioned lists was the hero who led seven others aboard a vessel in which they survived the global Flood.
Christistruth1 2 months ago
@wraith168 Seriously man??? It's Thanksgiving and you're worried about my argument? Seriously???
Christistruth1 3 months ago
@Christistruth1 Aw had some time to kill before going and hanging out with the family for thanksgiving :). And not worried about anything. Just answering a comment. Hope you had a good thanksgiving. Take care.
wraith168 3 months ago
@wraith168 Okay, great. "How is the flood story historically accurate?" He have accounts in every culture of it. It's in geology as well. "When exactly did this flood happen?" I don't know, the Bible never says. That's kind of a dumb question. "That doesn't mean that the only possible reason for it is that there had to be a great flood." You can't just throw out what cultures who have never met agree on. Now, you're just assuming their mislead. (rolls eyes)
Christistruth1 2 months ago
@wraith168 cont...This video even proves a great flood. Math doesn't lie, it's the only absolute truth in science. I go by knowledge as well, my faith is trust in the knowledge I have obtained, it's not blind faith like yours, you just call your blind faith knowledge, while mine is backed up, by history, archeology, math, and science.
Christistruth1 3 months ago
Creationists proved dinosaurs existed not that 'God' is real.
Z9A7X2O 3 months ago
@Z9A7X2O Creation proves God is real, you just don't agree, so disbelieving in God doesn't prove he's not real. Fail.
Christistruth1 3 months ago
Convincing argument that dragons were real (dinosaurs). I can believe that because there is a considerable amount of history pointing in that direction.
But my problem is that it doesn't prove creationism...
They're just saying some dinosaurs survived up to recent history living with humans and matches up with the accounts in the bible. I can see this a true as well because humans wrote the bible, its history. But this doesn't explain why dinosaur bones are carbon dated millionsofyearsago
Z9A7X2O 3 months ago 3
Comment removed
Z9A7X2O 3 months ago
@Z9A7X2O hey, i believe that would come from what they were saying about how even when a fresh volcanic eruption happens, if you carbon date the crust that is made it will still say that it is millions of years old when it was just created, and there is proof and eye witnesses that will verify that it was just formed. From what i gather, they were saying that carbon dating is not an accurate measuring system.
jrichmo4 2 months ago
@jrichmo4 you're right, they do say that here. i must have missed that section earlier. looks llike they need a better test. But then again this is the only mention ive ever heard of carbon dating not being accurate...
Z9A7X2O 2 months ago
@Z9A7X2O Carbon 14 dating works fine but only goes back 60,000 years so they don't use it to date fossils. The best dating is done on ash layers above and below the fossil.
gregrutz 3 weeks ago
@Z9A7X2O Carbon dating doesn't do millions of years because carbon 14 decays too quickly, so is irrelevant to this debate. Do you mean potassium/argon dating or another dating?
CalebSchultink 3 weeks ago
@jrichmo4 My main argument with this is how they say dinosaurs living with humans prove creationism. Just bc they lived at the same time doesn't mean there is a god. There are many stories in ancient relligion (mythology) all over the world that have dragons and similar monsters but creationists claim that those ancient religions are mthological bc they don't follow the bible and worship their god.
Z9A7X2O 2 months ago
@jrichmo4 In my opinion you could use the same argument that dinosaours existed to back up those so called mythologies. It just seems hypocrytical to me. This would have made a great documentary about dragons, dinosaurs etc. if it wasnt for all the creationism pushing.
Z9A7X2O 2 months ago
@Z9A7X2O Also they talked about how when they ran the helium test on the fossils, it was found that that test dated them to about 6000 years old
jrichmo4 2 months ago
@Z9A7X2O Carbon 14 - 12 only goes up to 50,000 years max disregarding it's problem with heat, pressure, and atmospheric phenomenons affecting the dating. If you've actually ever seen a radiometric dating process undergo testing and retesting, you'd know that it never ends with the same dates - you must have a controlled environment like a tomb.
Bones are inferred to be that date by their placement in a geologic column (which itself has many problems - of which some are discuss in the video).
DavidOchabski 1 month ago
@Z9A7X2O Also your point about both dinosaurs and the Bible obviously correlating because they are both "history" just shows that you don't understand the dissonance between supposed dates of when dinosaurs died off and when the Books of the Bible was written.
Paleontologists and Scholars alike will tell you that recorded human history started at 10K BC at latest and dinosaurs died off 65Mil years ago at the earliest. That doesn't leave room for both of them to live together - that's the point.
DavidOchabski 1 month ago
@Z9A7X2O
Because the dating of the granites is wholly a fraud. Educate yourself in this area and you will see why and how this is so. You have taken something for granted which you base your interpretations from. In other words.. if you do not truly understand what water is comprised of.. how can you then pretend to accurately measure the sea?
mrtruthify 3 weeks ago
@mrtruthify Yes, every dating method ever invented is wrong because they all show the earth is old. LOL
gregrutz 3 weeks ago
@gregrutz they all contradict each other. Some dating methods give a young age(like under 10 thousand years), some a medium age(about 100 thousand yrs - 500 thousand yrs), some and old age(like 100 million years old) , and some even very old age (like a few billion years old) And yes even some methods give a even couple trillion years old. How old is the earth, well how old do you want it to be.
DerektheDuctTape 3 weeks ago
gregrutz 3 weeks ago
@gregrutz Radioactive dating is not reliable because it is based on many assumptions.
1) Rate was always the same in every place and time, never varied.
2) That there was daughter elements when the rock or whatever was created.
Neither of these two is reasonable to assume.
DerektheDuctTape 3 weeks ago
@DerektheDuctTape Geologist discovered the earth was old over 200 years ago. Radiometric dating was invented in 1943. Plate tectonice and sea floor spreading was confirmed in 1950's
Radioactive decay does not change just to match the bible.
gregrutz 3 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
It's hard to believe anything nowadays.
phanable1 3 months ago
if we're fucked, we're fucked, get over it. If you're here bitching on youtube you're not getting ready for it so you can't care that much. So save us having to read you're whiny comments and move on
MrHippyking 4 months ago
blah i found that these are the same facts they use in the video.
HaphazardCrappola 4 months ago
Children and stories LOL Teach them some science and the facts.
Dinosaurs were the dominant terrestrial vertebrates for over 160 million years, from the late Triassic period (230 million years ago) until the end of the Cretaceous period (65 million years ago), when the Cretaceous–Tertiary extinction event caused the extinction of most dinosaur species, except for some birds.
gregrutz 4 months ago
Gods Creation is so Amazing. Praise God. Only people in denial of the facts in denial of real Science dont believe in it.
coolvideo28 4 months ago
@coolvideo28 Kent Hovind thinks he can prove ever scientist in the world wrong. LOL
His lying put him in Prison for Fraud !
gregrutz 4 months ago
@gregrutz No evolutionist would debate him before he went in because he used Real science to destroy evol. Fairytale and he would embaress them. They couldnt win with Science so they got somone to throw him in jail to try to silence him, wait until he gets out.
coolvideo28 4 months ago
@coolvideo28 When did Kent prove anything? LOL ''they got somone to throw him in jail '' Who is ''they'' and who is ''someone''
So the ''Evolutionism Framing Team'' sent Kent to Prison............HA HA HA
gregrutz 4 months ago
@gregrutz You think there is no curoption no crooked judges etc? You are very naive.
coolvideo28 4 months ago
@coolvideo28 There are no ''curoption'' judges etc?
Are you home schooled or did you just skip school all together?
gregrutz 4 months ago
@gregrutz Even other creationists (young and old earthers) criticized Kent Hovind, believing that many of his arguments are invalid and thereby undermine their causes. The guy is a quack. If you are going to make someone your poster child, please pick someone else.
wraith168 3 months ago
@gregrutz I have to agree with coolvideo. Dinosaur collagen and seemingly nucleated red blood cells was found on a supposed 65 million year old fosil, how is this possible? It defies all kinds of logic because while biological material can be preserved under some conditions it is unlikely that they continue to be preserved for millions of years. So like the crooked judges, evolutionist came to the defense of their theory claiming it was bacterial biofilm unfortunately Harvard said it's not true
HaphazardCrappola 4 months ago
@gregrutz Moreover, physicist are admitting that the sun can affect the half life of isotopes. Although, it was dino fossils where never dated in the first place one has to think about the reasons why scientist think its an old world. The first would be because of the supposed geological record that says gradualism is what happens vs catastrophes. Gradualism theory is why evolution works, however on earth their are always catastrophic events so I would say take that info with a grain of salt.
HaphazardCrappola 4 months ago
@HaphazardCrappola Darwin was wrong about 'gradualism' He did not know about the 6 great mass extinctions that happened in the past.
Uniformitarianism says the PROCESS are the same today as yesterday. Not the it was uniform or gradual.
There is no ''gradualism vs catastrophes'', that is creationist bull shit.
And Geologists knew the earth was old before radiometric dating was invented.
They didn't find any evidence of a global flood either.
gregrutz 4 months ago
@gregrutz Again mass extinctions have nothing to do with evolution, so the 6 great mass extinctions u keep mentioning is nothing but bullshit. Darwin's theory was based on a geologist Charles Lyell model which if you were to at least google and enlighten yourself, you would see that it incorporates the idea of gradualism. The only bullshit here is the ideas your typing on this page. There are indeed evidence for a global flood, what are you smoking? Do you think dinos naturally fossilize?
HaphazardCrappola 4 months ago
@HaphazardCrappola What evidence for a global flood? What is the name of the flood mud layer with all the dead bodies in it?
Lyell proved the earth was old which gave Darwin the idea that there was plenty of time for evolution. The Theroy of evolution has nothing to do with lyell or geology.
Geology just proves the earth is millions of years old and there was no flood.
The mass extinctions are part of the fossil record, something you have to deny.
gregrutz 4 months ago
@gregrutz You are such a convoluted mess lol, I'm surprised you actually believe ANYTHING of what you are saying with such a limited understanding science. Lyell never PROVED the earth was old, he postulated that the earth was old. There are no PROOFS in science, as my biology professor said, if you want PROOFS STUDY MATH. The theory of evolution was indeed based on an old earth theory. Without time there is no evolution. The current theory of evolution which incorporates sudden change still
HaphazardCrappola 4 months ago
@gregrutz still needs time. Gradualism and punctured equilibrium and is the core to evolution and they STILL REQUIRE AN OLD EARTH. Is that so hard for you to understand? "Mass extinction" "mass extinction" please refrain from writing any papers in the near future because you bring the most asinine examples that don't back anything up. Mass extinction and fossil record have nothing to do with evolution. Mentioning the fossil record does not prove evolution, those where due to catastrophic events
HaphazardCrappola 4 months ago
@HaphazardCrappola ''they STILL REQUIRE AN OLD EARTH''
The Earth is 4,545 Million years old, isn't that long enough for evolution to happen?
'' Mass extinction and fossil record have nothing to do with evolution''
WHAT THE HELL DO YOU THINK WE ARE TRYING TO EXPALIN ?!? THE FOSSILS RECORD !!
gregrutz 4 months ago
@gregrutz Hilarious. Hilarious. Hilarious. I'm going to stop responding right now, because there is a vast number of information available online for the non biased mind. You are purporting supposed knowledge of geology, than claim that the Earth is 4.5 million years old. Don't you mean Billion? Fossil records don't prove evolution, they show that species can die out. Those are two very different concepts and theory of evolution is not necessary to point out what common sense says can happen.
HaphazardCrappola 4 months ago
@HaphazardCrappola Dear Creatard, 4,545 Million years = 4.5 Billion. Are you home schooled?
Fossils show that species LIVED. You can't explain dinosaurs living for 160 Million years.
You can't explain why 98% of all species that ever lived are extinct ! No trilobites, no sabertooth tigers, no mammoths, no Neaderthal Man, no strange marine creatures from the Cambrian Period.
Common sense says heavy things fall faster than light things, read a science book dummy.
gregrutz 4 months ago
@gregrutz that include FLOODS. Moreover, evidence for global flood could be found by actually picking up a geology book. If global warming was indeed a reality and the ice caps would melt, what do you think would happen? What the hell do you think happened during the Ice age? Think sucka.
HaphazardCrappola 4 months ago
@HaphazardCrappola Geology proves there was never a global flood, read a geology book, Visit the Grand Canyon and read how each layer was made.
Ice melting will not raise the oceans 29.029 feet to cover Mt. Everest. Now make up a story that the mountain was smaller 4400 years ago. LOL
The Chinese have a long history with many floods and they did not all die in one.
gregrutz 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
what a crock of shit!!!
8698gil 4 months ago
Excellent video but, of course, the foundational work for this was doen by Kent Hovind who single-handedly put this information before the (decieved evolutionists) public eye.
KingJamesBible 4 months ago
@KingJamesBible Kent Hovind , not the best person to hang your hat on.
wraith168 3 months ago
@wraith168 Why would that be?
KingJamesBible 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@wraith168 Even other creationists (young and old earthers) criticized Kent Hovind, believing that many of his arguments are invalid and thereby undermine their causes. The guy is a quack.
wraith168 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Liars for Jesus.
How do you get around the 10th commandment? Whats the loophole that allowed you people to lie?
infinity730 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Liars for Jesus.
How do you get around the 10th commandment? Whats the loophole that allowed you people to lie?
infinity730 5 months ago
i thought this started out as a decent program the ending completely had me rolling my eyes, and i felt i was being preached too.
MrPhilip103 5 months ago
read the book.......it's excellent. You can then follow up on your own research. Love it. :)
paul12clearwater 5 months ago
a certain 'Mramericanzombie' thinks it is funny to bash people with unintelligent content..provoking other people with the most dreadful things,but keeps his own channel 'unavailable'. A troll type,so you will. Well,youtube,how about it?You are usually quick enough to give out (false) strikes for much less than this.
Darwinism is the real delusion.May God bless you all with His Truth.
StingDrift 5 months ago
If creationists are right about dinosaurs and the flood, then we should be really worried about global warming and the next flood that is coming!
XionXXXX 6 months ago
Yea, Noah' ark...where it's to small for ceveral millions of species... in Europe... (America didn't exist at that time...it existed when it was discovered by Vikkings, but again, it didn't exist for the rest of the world.)
Poodleinacan 7 months ago
For the love of Christ..If people would just be able to accept that the earth excists from the day God decided to create it.And that He has the right to put life on it as He pleases.From dragons to aliens.Then we could all enjoy the amazement of His wonders much more,and just be thankful that we have the privelege of His pleasures,and a chance to get even more where that came from through Jesus Christ in heaven one day.God Bless you all.
StingDrift 7 months ago
@StingDrift I don't accept anything that isn't and can't be proven such as the idea that there is some supreme being out playing the game of life with us.
wraith168 3 months ago
.im guessing most of you people only watched up untill they said the word God then left cuz they give very reasonable PROOF not theory. not a fairytale . most people will believe in whatever a scientist or politician says especially
if it bashes christians. sience proves
creationism more that it proves evolution
coasterfiend05 7 months ago 6
@coasterfiend05 There are over 250,000 peer-reviewed scientific studies on evolution, with full support from every related life science, including genetics. DNA Code itself proves how all life is related to all life.
There has not been a single falsification to refute evolution in 150 years of relentless scrutiny!
It is the backbone of Biology, accepted by 99.98% of scientists.
Dragons and a global flood are a myth, no eviedence.
gregrutz 4 months ago
@coasterfiend05 There are over 250,000 peer-reviewed scientific studies on evolution, with full support from every related life science, including genetics. DNA Code itself proves how all life is related to all life.
There has not been a single falsification to refute evolution in 150 years of relentless scrutiny!
It is the backbone of Biology, accepted by 99.98% of scientists.
gregrutz 4 months ago
@coasterfiend05 HOLY fuck... You may actually be living DISproof of evolution...!
Sokail87 3 months ago
@coasterfiend05 I pray to a non-existent troll that I misunderstood your comment and you're actually just making fun of this documentary ^^
6al6is6 3 months ago
@6al6is6 Ok, lol, I dunno how I typed "troll" instead of "god. Sorry for that xD
6al6is6 3 months ago
people....they found DNA in a T-rex femer bone! not just any but soft tissue.
and fragmented protein cells. if it died millions of years ago there wouldnt
be any dna left. also alot of the dinosaurs are found incased in rock standing
streight up, not lying down. and no not in a tar pit either. this means the rock
had to cover them very fast...this was done by a giant earthwide flood.
coasterfiend05 7 months ago
@coasterfiend05 OR, the t-rex died in in "mud", stucked in it and couldn't get out.
Poodleinacan 7 months ago
@coasterfiend05 The T-Rex bone you mention was 70 million yrs old. Scientist don't dispute the age of the bone. As for your flood "evidence", there are other more scientific explanations on this. For instance, volcanic eruptions can cover things quickly leaving them "standing straight up". You don't need a world wide flood explanation. Especially when the is no geological evidence for a world wide flood.
wraith168 3 months ago
Actually no go and put a freshly killed chicken outside and see if it's there in the morning scavengers will pick the carcass clean and the bones decompose very quickly and food for thought they have found plesiosaur like carcasses that have washed up on shore and carcasses in fishing nets
MarkIITrooper 9 months ago
Okay...so they got carvings and statues and stories...where are the unfossilized dinosaur bones? If dinosaurs existed as little as 800 years ago,there should be tons of unfossilized dinosaur bones. If I killed a dinosaur in medieval times,I woulda made it's bones into a helmet or shield or something.
So where is this evidence?
elbeghast 9 months ago
@elbeghast where is Julius Caesars body or bones? where is Alexander the Great's remains? these were great men from history that we knew existed and how? have u ever seen a trillion dollars or held it in your hands? its highly doubtful that you do or did but still we know it exists because we've heard it does...there's so many ?'s and not truthful answers...its called deception...honestly why has certain parts of the bible been censored? not unless there's something to hide...
Sunspotjohnny26 7 months ago
@Sunspotjohnny26 Wow that's your "logical" argument? Really? We know Caesar and Alexander existed because of multiple corroborating historical sources. I know money exists because I have some. I can touch it, hold it, its there. Does a trillion dollars exist? Maybe, maybe not. You would have to put all the money together and count it out to find out so you don't know it exists but you have some evidence that it might. There is NO evidence of dinos 800 yrs ago.
wraith168 3 months ago
@elbeghast yea.
And in Japan, dragons were noble creatures, in their mythology
Poodleinacan 7 months ago
Amazing video!!!!
MrMonkipuzzle 9 months ago
This was a wonderful expose' on the reality of creationism and of course the fallacy and complete ridiculousness of the THEORY of evolution. Just like any other issue, some people would not believe facts even in the face of them, because they do not want to believe. This kind of bias should NEVER be allowed in our education system. So much for the earth being billions of years old...oh, and thanks to all the ignorant fools who taught this stoopid theory to all those impressionable minds.
cr500blur 10 months ago
In reference to Harizl's comment, I have watched this video 4 times and nowhere can I find where they quoted anything in relation to Sagan second I would say evolutionist are the ones stuck in six grade considering any and all evidence real or imagined by evolutionists has been disproved or dis accounted at sometime or another and any evidence in the future will be disproved, if you can show me one piece of evidence that will prove evolution that hasn't been disproved i will take back my comment
MarkIITrooper 10 months ago
@MarkIITrooper
any evidence for evolution has been disproved? lol..by who, creationists? hahaha..is that why 99.8% of earth and life scientists accept evolution?
itzahazylife 10 months ago
@itzahazylife yes by creationists! for example evolutionist famed discovery neanderthal man, evolutionists found a TOOTH and decided it was a fossil from an early human they then proceeded to draw a picture of what they thought it looked like it was later found to be the tooth of a extinct pig. and what you need to remember is evolution is as much a THEORY as creation its not scientific and its NOT a fact
MarkIITrooper 10 months ago
@MarkIITrooper
u are out of your mind and very very misinformed..a theory in science is the highest possible explanation for a natural mystery..it is NOT just a guess. a scientific theory is built by facts and evidence. the theory is what explains and fits in with the facts and evidence. creationism is not science. if it was, it'd be considered a scientific theory BY SCIENTISTS..not creationists pretending to be scientists.
itzahazylife 10 months ago
@MarkIITrooper
for example..u claim that life is evidence of creation via an intelligence..well, who is this designer?..where is the evidence of the designer? how does he go about designing life? what are the mechanisms of his/her/its design?..what would be the lesson in schools?..god did it?..everything u creationists claim needs an intelligent designer, scientists can explain with blind natural processes.
itzahazylife 10 months ago
@itzahazylife
in reference to your second comment, God is the designer. where is the evidence of your brain there is none but you believe it is there. how does he create life? that's how great God is he only had to create life once and everything is in motion for the future. order is the mechanism of his design. the lessons in school would be to let them decide but show both "theories" lastly so it takes blindness to be evolutionist... ok
MarkIITrooper 10 months ago
@MarkIITrooper
there is no evidence of my brain?..are u fucking kidding me?..this is your argument?..and no, creationism is not a scientific theory..i don't think u understand what a scientific theory is in science..it isn't just a guess. it is the highest possible status an explanation can get in science..it is an explanation that fits in with the observable evidence..and evolution does just that. creationism isn't science..it relies on the assumption that god exists.
itzahazylife 10 months ago
@itzahazylife
you must not be reading my comments right, i have stated on multiple posts creationism is not scientific now its time for you to say the same about evolution both are only theories. BOTH take FAITH! But takes less faith to believe God created - than that you came from a monkey... when there are NO fossil records to support evolution. The fossil record supports creation-sorry. The brain comment was - you've never seen/touched/etc. your brain. But I believe you have one! :-) Faith
MarkIITrooper 10 months ago
@MarkIITrooper
the 2nd law of thermodynamics says that in a CLOSED system, it will go from order to disorder (entropy)..earth is an OPEN system. earth gets energy from the sun!
- evolution DOESN'T say we came from monkey's.
- why would it to be easier to believe in god when there has never been any evidence ever found that god or gods even exist?
-the fossil record DOES support evolution. creationists are WRONG when they claim it doesn't..read up on WHY..do some RESEARCH.
itzahazylife 10 months ago
@itzahazylife
i don't know what book your reading but every other evolutionist says you came from a ape or ape like early human. this is not a debate about God or even creation this is where you can't prove that evolution is science its JUST A THEORY just admit that and we'll all be happy. no show me a picture of a transitional fossil you should have found billions
MarkIITrooper 10 months ago
@MarkIITrooper
u don't do any research from scientific sources, do u?..there are transitional fossils..look it up!
itzahazylife 10 months ago
@MarkIITrooper Actually it says we have a COMMON ancestors as apes. There is a difference there. And you lack the understanding of what a scientific theory is as opposed to a theory in layman's terms. Those are very different also. A misunderstanding or flat out disregard of what scientific theory is why creationists can rationalize that evolution is only a theory. You need to go look up scientific theory.
wraith168 3 months ago
@MarkIITrooper
the brain thing was STUPID of u to say..there is a huge amount of evidence that a brain is inside of my head..i have seen brains before. i know brains exist.. i have learned from medical science that all human beings have brains. and wouldn't u know, i'm a human being!!!.. i have seen surgeries done on human brains..i'm alive!..and well shit, i need a brain to be alive!..u are a stupid fucking person do u know that?
itzahazylife 10 months ago
@itzahazylife
my point on the whole brain thing was you've heard of other brains you've seen other brains but you can't prove YOU have a brain unless we take it out or do surgery and this is a debate that evolution is not science stick to the facts and apparently you are taking this personally if you can't continue in a mature manner(without cursing) i will stop here
MarkIITrooper 10 months ago
@MarkIITrooper
the brain example is NOT AT ALL equal to god..there is MUCH MUCH more evidence that there's a brain in my head, then there is that god or gods exist.
itzahazylife 10 months ago
@itzahazylife
in reference to there being more evidence of your brain than God i agree 100% it was just an example of how to view proof. however, again, evolution is NOT scientific and you cannot prove it through scientific methods because it continues to break SO many scientific LAWS im shocked that you want to quote science only when it is convenient to you but ignore the many scientific laws that evolution breaks.
MarkIITrooper 10 months ago
@itzahazylife I could prove that youtube never existed, if I eliminated every single computer from earth, and blocked all electricity away from this planet, certainly there would be no real prove "youtube exited" except for "eye witnesses". So, if another life form came to earth and where to ask me the question whether youtube ever existed, data would be subject to peoples interpretation, but not to the "data itself"
That is the problem of history, and were evolution fails to understand!
CBSINDAHOUSE 5 months ago
@MarkIITrooper
It wasn't too far back that everyone thought the world was flat and i must ask you did that make it any less round, so my point is numbers don't matter, facts and laws do! and evolution breaks most of them like the second law of thermodynamics, all things go from order to disorder, and the law of kinds, one species only gives way to more of it's species, and the law of bio genesis which states life can ONLY come from other life!!! those are scientific laws that cannot be broken!
MarkIITrooper 10 months ago
@MarkIITrooper
evolution fits in with all of the evidence found!!!...we have actually witnesses generations of bacteria evolve..we have seen the wolf evolve into all the different breeds of dog..we have seen insects evolve. we have many different types of genetic evidence that we evolved. the fossils are in order. simple life is deeper underground, while more complex life is higher up. there ARE transitional fossils and even LIVING animals displaying transitions.
itzahazylife 10 months ago