What about Article 1 Section 10? "No State shall enter into .... emit Bills of Credit; make any Thing but gold and silver Coin a Tender in Payment of Debts..." Or does that apply to the federal gov? What about inflation and personal savings?
Yep, lets created more government monopolies so the liars, cheats, power hungry bottom feeders have another source of power to eventually infiltrate and corrupt the system…. again and again… Then when it fails, more government involvement… rinse and repeat for the rest of time with LaRouche level of thinking. The problem is the GOVERNMENT!
Hahaha... let me set this straight for anyone who believed this little factoid:
You "don't tolerate kings and queens" in America because you were told not to by a King. You lost the revolutionary war; the white house as you all should know was burned down two times. You guys were forced to sign a treaty of no less than a dozen terms, on top which read you won't appoint a king or queen, because the guy in England at the time considered America his.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
LaRouche is controlled opposition for the New World Order,LaRouche advocates socialism and central banking,while exposing present day corruptions and citing opinionated history parallels,he then offers his "solution" and his solution is the whole "solidarity,labor party,socialism cataclysm" = VERY BAD
In short....any system that differs from the U.S. Constitutional Republic is flawed,that system PROVED itself and never failed,it was only hijacked by people just like Larouche,he's like Obama.
LaRouche is FOR solidarity,labor party,socialism, and I myself see that as VERY BAD,plus history agrees with ME,not LaRouche.
While Facism is CORPORATE SOCIALISM...it's SOCIALISM none the less.
Also,if America adhered to the true principles of the "FREE MARKET",and truly imposed the free market governing laws that belong to the free market,like price gouging,monopoly growth,fair wages,and plain Constitutional guidelines,then America wouldn't be the FASCISM it is now,America is not the problem.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Wolves in Sheeps Clothing,(LaRouche,Obama,Clinton) are the problem,socialism is so very deceptive,people change,the crowd will cheer you to the gallows,we don't need that immoral mess,we need the Constitution,not interpretations of the Constitution,we would have never witnessed slavery if people would have not tried to interpret the Constitution,we would have had ALL FREE MEN held accountable to themselves instead of ANY STATE.
programs and government interventionism in our lives on every level. Look up the great depression that happened in 1921 it lasted one year why??? because the government did nothing and let it ride itself out so it was over in 1 year. That's a history lesson for you Larouche you moron.
@vickyv85 Both the depressions in 1921 and 1929 were caused by the banksters, not by some natural businesses cycle. The fact that the one in 1921 lasted shorter than the latter had nothing to do with non-existence of government social programs. The root cause was the contractive policy of FED using the weak point of fractional reserve system, where you only need to remove a small portion of basis money to collapse a lot of credit money out of existence.
I read about this Larouche character just to see if maybe as a Ron Paul supporter I could see anything that I like about the guy and I realized that I disagree with him on everything. I mean how could I like a guy who think FDR was one of our greatest presidents?? this guy claims historians have it wrong, well guess what Larouche FDR was one of the worst presidents in American history him and Hoover are 100% percent responsible for the Great Depression with their worthless irresponsible social..
... since he was a doctor, he wants to get rid of the patriot act, get rid of the department of education, get rid of the department of homeland security, get rid of illegal torture and most importantly bring all our troops home and stay out of the foreign affairs of other countries while increasing trade and being more engaged in the world community threw cultural exchanges. That's what I believe in I don't care for Larouche's take he is nobody who wants to make a name for himself.
Who cares about Larouche and what he said, Ron Paul is the only one doing anything about the Federal Reserve and he has majority co-sponsorship for HR 1207 to have the GAO audit the Fed. What does Larouche offer?? some kind of history lesson that has plenty of inaccuracies in itself?? What's his plan of action?? nothing!!! Ron Paul wants to get rid of the IRS, get rid of the war on drugs, regulate the FED and possibly link fiat money to gold, he knows the health care system better than anyone..
I think most of Ron Paul supporters actually support LaRouche but they are confused about the credit system nature of our constitution. Also the General welfare concept and even the concept of freedom itself in our constitution. Which concept of freedom was it the founding fathers embedded in our constitution? If you are interested in these ideas go to and bookmark LaRouchePacdotcom
Really look closely at the solution LaRouche espouses. It is absolutely consistent with the constitution.
Austrian economics is the answer to all our economic problems that's what people need to learn from this video is way too misleading and I don't have time to go into every detail.
Ok folks Vickyv85 has said it as Ron Paul has, but it is fascism you do know that don't you vickyv86?
The Austrian model is, corporatism. Did you know that Mussolini coined the term fascism? Well it is true and he said that the term corporatism was a more descriptive or better word for the policy.
What world are you living in?? did you just compare the austrian economic theory to fascism??? That has to be one of the dumbest things I've ever heard in a long time. Fascism and communism is virtually the same thing with a few minor differences while the austrian economic theory is completely on the other side of the political spectrum. It is similar to the economic model that Hong Kong uses today and Hong Kong is considered the most free economy in the world.
Fascism is corporatism! Isn't that what we have now, with the population taking the hit for the financial corporations? I think if you would study what LaRouche is proposinging you would agree. Surely you believe in the general welfare basis for our constitution. Maybe you just think it is imposible to take power from the financiers of the world, but it is not. In fact LaRouche is in the process right now.
We don't need private central banks. We the citizens need our own bank.
Corporatism is when the Fascist State brings both big business and trade unions together to form a single (and largely powerless, Unions can't strike and Big Business is threatened with nationalisation if it doesn't play ball) management. It's supposed to remove class struggle and make the economy work the way the state (which in Fascism is supreme) wants it too. It is in no way related to hardcore free market economics.
and who cares what Alexander Hamilton said about money and credit why don't you look up Ludwig Von Muses all of his theories and predictions have come to become fact just as he pointed out in Human Action. Thomas Jefferson also disagreed with Hamilton on banking and credit. I don't have time to argue about all of this but this Larouche theory isn't going anywhere cause it's nonsense.
Wow, Alexander Hamilton and Ben Franklin, were the most important of the fathers. That is why Hamilton met the fate he met, being shot by a subsequently convicted traitor Arron Burr. And yes Jefferson was a royalist at heart. That is the point. Do you believe private interests should control our credit?
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
This is your personal opinion that Hamilton and Franklin were the most important of the founders, Thomas Jefferson accomplished significantly more than Hamilton or Franklin. Jefferson was the one who stopped Hamilton from forming a central bank in the first place. As far as economics go I believe in the Austrian school which is what Ron Paul believes. Ron Paul is a strict constitutionalist, a congressman for 20 years and a doctor for another 20 years. What the hell has Larouche done??
Wow you really have no idea who Lyndon LaRouche is do you? Ben Franklin was the intelligence force of the revolution. And Hamilton did set up the bank. Vicky you really should listen to some of the videos. But, did you hear what LaRouche said Friday? He said Oct. 12 was DDay for this system. We must get a change by then.
search lucis trust zeitgeist lies, then come back and ask for venus project again. aka utopia.
alarmbells going on yet?
who would provide the food,who would own the underwater generators?
as for banking, banks should be non profit corps,100percent reserves,no interest rates within a backed by something currency,taxpayers would agree to pay the salaries for these honest bankers.
We can do a lot more than dream. We can join the LaRouche movement and fight for it.
did you see on LaRouchePacdotCom
where LaRouche just said it will go on Oct 12th if not before. Go to LaRouche pac and donate to help the youth movement get the job done. This can be stopped if you join LaRouche. If you let it collapse you will be very sorry you did.
I would say nightmare, would be a more fitting description of your state of mind than dreaming. So come on folks we can have theAmerican system
Come on guys ! Pro "American System" viewers give this video five stars. I think all Ron Paul supporters are actually supporters of the American system. They just don't understand that Ron Paul doesn't support the American system.
What is the American System anyway? LaRouche is the man teaching it.
The US no longer has a National Bank. The powers of Congress to create money were turned over to the Federal Reserve Board and the Neo-cons of the Republican party deregulated the banks in the 80's. Ron Paul is a Constitutionalist and believes in the limited powers of the Federal Government as set fourth by the Constitution which are the Federal Gov, is to coin money and regulate the value there of and to provide a military and to guarantee to the states a republican form of Government
Yes, and I (though I am not a LaRouchite) appreciate Paul for this.
However, he is opposed to ANY National Bank in the Jacksonian tradition and supports Austrian economics, which actually are supported by many of the world's economic elites and partly imposed undemocratically via IMF/World Bank/globalisation treaties.
So I love Ron Paul for his honesty and integrity, but his solutions will NOT reverse course!
Share this video ! Educate your friends on the principles this nation was founded on and what indeed made it great. And listen to wierdjoe he is a wise man.
The lead up to the constitution, and it's implementation were all made possible by Alexander Hamilton... start watching the video and ignore the poor choice of a title, and you all might learn some real history. BORROWED ON THE CREDIT OF THE UNITED STATES! not borrowed on debt. to a private bank.
It would take a strong central government to implement that sort of standard... you could do that and still be for a smaller state than we have. stop being victims of polarized debate.
I don't understand why people are upset. It was pretty obvious that there were alot of differences. For example LaRouche or his followers believe in a central government while Ron Paul is for decentralize. Why do you think they always bring up Hamilton and dislike Jefferson?
I guess it just takes a rude title to make it more obvious.
I agree. I can't believe that they are saying Ron Paul is an idiot! This pisses me off! He wants to audit the fed. I may un subscribe to la rouche after this BS!!! I don't know ALL the facts but I have listened to Dr. Paul and he speaks the truth as far as I can tell? Please, let me know if I am missing something and also, have proof of it. Don't slam me for questioning either as I am asking why la rouche is saying these things?
I am taking the initiative to get this title removed and changed as we speak. I ask that you kind folk forgive the title and consider what the LaRouche camp has to offer as well as what the Paul camp is doing.
Fools, the reason why free market is non existent is because the money manipulators dont allow it to be a free market in the first place. If there was ever a real free market there would be no banks, the government will be almost non-existent and many politicians will be useless. Its rather sad to continue to have this debate, whether we need a private central bank or a national bank, paper money or gold coins. This is all in the past, our civ needs an upgrade. Look for the Venus Project.
Ron Paul is a good man, but an idealist in the most extreme sense.
History would only provide the answers to that statement. We need a strong state, to override Empire, empire isnt a nation, a people, or anything of the sort, it's usuary of money, oligarchs, and financiers of all sorts, that subsume the authority of the state. It's been the same empire since the revolution, to this present day the "british" empire which has its venetian roots.
A lot of this actually stems from miseducation, and manipulation, divide and conquer. Free market idealism sounds good to a lot of people, but they need to be informed there is no such thing as a free market, and it's the means of control, and the heart of an invisible empire.
Hamilton was infact correct, but big vs small government extends much further than monetary policy, and the Hamiltons and Jeffersons of today need to come together against the financiers.
this title does nothing but create a divide, Lyndon Larouche however has even prasided Ron Pauls honesty, and guts on the air while talking to Jack Stockwell's radio show.
the federalists, and the anti's have never found a common ground for the defense of this country, and it's obvious, and the slanders on both parts here are evidence of why.... it's time to find a common enemy and a common ground people.
I appeal to your better conscience. A title like this does no good. Please remove this thread and retitle this more appropriately and reconsider any Paul bashing.
on top of that he holds to the idea that this system is fixable. We must replace this system. LaRouche is the man calling for that, and ron paul probably can't even pronounce his name. If Ron Paul will sign on to the Dingell Bill calling for a Pecora Commission then I will retract my polemic. Mike Hodgkiss
I still think if Paul and LaRouche can get together and work on ideas the possibilities would be endless. I dont think the LaRouche camp would be so brash to call Paul an idiot. RonPauI is very sincere, so I would sincerely hope not.
what makes Ron Paul an Idiot based on this video? The idea of credit system vs this fiat system we have now? I think you guys are not getting your points across very well and just upset that Ron Paul is becoming more main stream vs your nonFederal socialist ideas not gaining ground. sad.
@HHODork we're humans more than individuals. what makes one to say that he is more entitled to better health care or education by simply relying on his/her wallet. those are basic human and civil necessities. ron paul is not for the belief of "We the People" where everyone's basic human necessities are recognized. he's for the belief of social darwinism "Doesn't matter what's your situation, it's your own fault, and you're on your own"
And your point is? This is a poor argument. Good luck.
KenpoKousin 6 months ago
ladouche
nickcarter1987 7 months ago
What about Article 1 Section 10? "No State shall enter into .... emit Bills of Credit; make any Thing but gold and silver Coin a Tender in Payment of Debts..." Or does that apply to the federal gov? What about inflation and personal savings?
drshlotzkin 9 months ago
Yep, lets created more government monopolies so the liars, cheats, power hungry bottom feeders have another source of power to eventually infiltrate and corrupt the system…. again and again… Then when it fails, more government involvement… rinse and repeat for the rest of time with LaRouche level of thinking. The problem is the GOVERNMENT!
drshlotzkin 9 months ago
WHAT WRONG WILL YOU
hotrod4you2 1 year ago
HAHAHA IM VIEW 1776
What up???
VirtualInsanity91 1 year ago
Hamilton wanted a national bank i.e. The Federal Reserve. The Supreme Court declared a national bank unconstitutional.
ToxicOdiousOne 1 year ago
Money or freedom....assholes choose money....and greedy assholes get fucked!!
TheTrainstation 1 year ago
Hahaha... let me set this straight for anyone who believed this little factoid:
You "don't tolerate kings and queens" in America because you were told not to by a King. You lost the revolutionary war; the white house as you all should know was burned down two times. You guys were forced to sign a treaty of no less than a dozen terms, on top which read you won't appoint a king or queen, because the guy in England at the time considered America his.
truthIsStranger 1 year ago
haha! LaRouche socialists get totally owned on this comment section.
MetalHeadViking 2 years ago
Well, Lyndon LaRouche has just published the "Plan" . "The LaRouche Plan" is the constitutional solution to our crisis.
Find it at,
LaRouchePAC
link above right.
LaRoucheisright 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
LaRouche is controlled opposition for the New World Order,LaRouche advocates socialism and central banking,while exposing present day corruptions and citing opinionated history parallels,he then offers his "solution" and his solution is the whole "solidarity,labor party,socialism cataclysm" = VERY BAD
In short....any system that differs from the U.S. Constitutional Republic is flawed,that system PROVED itself and never failed,it was only hijacked by people just like Larouche,he's like Obama.
aesthetictripp 2 years ago
LaRouche is FOR solidarity,labor party,socialism, and I myself see that as VERY BAD,plus history agrees with ME,not LaRouche.
While Facism is CORPORATE SOCIALISM...it's SOCIALISM none the less.
Also,if America adhered to the true principles of the "FREE MARKET",and truly imposed the free market governing laws that belong to the free market,like price gouging,monopoly growth,fair wages,and plain Constitutional guidelines,then America wouldn't be the FASCISM it is now,America is not the problem.
aesthetictripp 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Wolves in Sheeps Clothing,(LaRouche,Obama,Clinton) are the problem,socialism is so very deceptive,people change,the crowd will cheer you to the gallows,we don't need that immoral mess,we need the Constitution,not interpretations of the Constitution,we would have never witnessed slavery if people would have not tried to interpret the Constitution,we would have had ALL FREE MEN held accountable to themselves instead of ANY STATE.
aesthetictripp 2 years ago
programs and government interventionism in our lives on every level. Look up the great depression that happened in 1921 it lasted one year why??? because the government did nothing and let it ride itself out so it was over in 1 year. That's a history lesson for you Larouche you moron.
vickyv85 2 years ago
@vickyv85 Both the depressions in 1921 and 1929 were caused by the banksters, not by some natural businesses cycle. The fact that the one in 1921 lasted shorter than the latter had nothing to do with non-existence of government social programs. The root cause was the contractive policy of FED using the weak point of fractional reserve system, where you only need to remove a small portion of basis money to collapse a lot of credit money out of existence.
mik1984 1 year ago
I read about this Larouche character just to see if maybe as a Ron Paul supporter I could see anything that I like about the guy and I realized that I disagree with him on everything. I mean how could I like a guy who think FDR was one of our greatest presidents?? this guy claims historians have it wrong, well guess what Larouche FDR was one of the worst presidents in American history him and Hoover are 100% percent responsible for the Great Depression with their worthless irresponsible social..
vickyv85 2 years ago
... since he was a doctor, he wants to get rid of the patriot act, get rid of the department of education, get rid of the department of homeland security, get rid of illegal torture and most importantly bring all our troops home and stay out of the foreign affairs of other countries while increasing trade and being more engaged in the world community threw cultural exchanges. That's what I believe in I don't care for Larouche's take he is nobody who wants to make a name for himself.
vickyv85 2 years ago
Who cares about Larouche and what he said, Ron Paul is the only one doing anything about the Federal Reserve and he has majority co-sponsorship for HR 1207 to have the GAO audit the Fed. What does Larouche offer?? some kind of history lesson that has plenty of inaccuracies in itself?? What's his plan of action?? nothing!!! Ron Paul wants to get rid of the IRS, get rid of the war on drugs, regulate the FED and possibly link fiat money to gold, he knows the health care system better than anyone..
vickyv85 2 years ago
freedom doesnt come from a paper(constitution).
that paper was made to controll the citizens.
btw, youre deadon, larouche is what ron paul supporters think they want
311ftw 2 years ago
The point was that there are different concepts of freedom. One of those concepts, namely the concept Liebniz had of freedom was the one.
Not the concept of freedom espoused by Loche and Adam Smith.
Franklin was a Liebnizian, so was Hamilton, as were Keats and Shelley..
I tell you that you are missing out if you don't know what the LaRouche movement knows.
Bookmark LaRouchePacdotcom now and contribute to help win this war for the American System. LaRouche can win but he needs your help.
LaRoucheisright 2 years ago
I think most of Ron Paul supporters actually support LaRouche but they are confused about the credit system nature of our constitution. Also the General welfare concept and even the concept of freedom itself in our constitution. Which concept of freedom was it the founding fathers embedded in our constitution? If you are interested in these ideas go to and bookmark LaRouchePacdotcom
Really look closely at the solution LaRouche espouses. It is absolutely consistent with the constitution.
LaRoucheisright 2 years ago
Austrian economics is the answer to all our economic problems that's what people need to learn from this video is way too misleading and I don't have time to go into every detail.
vickyv85 2 years ago
Ok folks Vickyv85 has said it as Ron Paul has, but it is fascism you do know that don't you vickyv86?
The Austrian model is, corporatism. Did you know that Mussolini coined the term fascism? Well it is true and he said that the term corporatism was a more descriptive or better word for the policy.
LaRoucheisright 2 years ago
What world are you living in?? did you just compare the austrian economic theory to fascism??? That has to be one of the dumbest things I've ever heard in a long time. Fascism and communism is virtually the same thing with a few minor differences while the austrian economic theory is completely on the other side of the political spectrum. It is similar to the economic model that Hong Kong uses today and Hong Kong is considered the most free economy in the world.
vickyv85 2 years ago
Fascism is corporatism! Isn't that what we have now, with the population taking the hit for the financial corporations? I think if you would study what LaRouche is proposinging you would agree. Surely you believe in the general welfare basis for our constitution. Maybe you just think it is imposible to take power from the financiers of the world, but it is not. In fact LaRouche is in the process right now.
We don't need private central banks. We the citizens need our own bank.
LaRoucheisright 2 years ago
Corporatism is when the Fascist State brings both big business and trade unions together to form a single (and largely powerless, Unions can't strike and Big Business is threatened with nationalisation if it doesn't play ball) management. It's supposed to remove class struggle and make the economy work the way the state (which in Fascism is supreme) wants it too. It is in no way related to hardcore free market economics.
DerBlitzStag 2 years ago
and who cares what Alexander Hamilton said about money and credit why don't you look up Ludwig Von Muses all of his theories and predictions have come to become fact just as he pointed out in Human Action. Thomas Jefferson also disagreed with Hamilton on banking and credit. I don't have time to argue about all of this but this Larouche theory isn't going anywhere cause it's nonsense.
vickyv85 2 years ago
Wow, Alexander Hamilton and Ben Franklin, were the most important of the fathers. That is why Hamilton met the fate he met, being shot by a subsequently convicted traitor Arron Burr. And yes Jefferson was a royalist at heart. That is the point. Do you believe private interests should control our credit?
LaRoucheisright 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
This is your personal opinion that Hamilton and Franklin were the most important of the founders, Thomas Jefferson accomplished significantly more than Hamilton or Franklin. Jefferson was the one who stopped Hamilton from forming a central bank in the first place. As far as economics go I believe in the Austrian school which is what Ron Paul believes. Ron Paul is a strict constitutionalist, a congressman for 20 years and a doctor for another 20 years. What the hell has Larouche done??
vickyv85 2 years ago
Wow you really have no idea who Lyndon LaRouche is do you? Ben Franklin was the intelligence force of the revolution. And Hamilton did set up the bank. Vicky you really should listen to some of the videos. But, did you hear what LaRouche said Friday? He said Oct. 12 was DDay for this system. We must get a change by then.
LaRoucheisright 2 years ago
venus project?
search lucis trust zeitgeist lies, then come back and ask for venus project again. aka utopia.
alarmbells going on yet?
who would provide the food,who would own the underwater generators?
as for banking, banks should be non profit corps,100percent reserves,no interest rates within a backed by something currency,taxpayers would agree to pay the salaries for these honest bankers.
we can dream.lol
311ftw 2 years ago 2
We can do a lot more than dream. We can join the LaRouche movement and fight for it.
did you see on LaRouchePacdotCom
where LaRouche just said it will go on Oct 12th if not before. Go to LaRouche pac and donate to help the youth movement get the job done. This can be stopped if you join LaRouche. If you let it collapse you will be very sorry you did.
I would say nightmare, would be a more fitting description of your state of mind than dreaming. So come on folks we can have theAmerican system
LaRoucheisright 2 years ago
Come on guys ! Pro "American System" viewers give this video five stars. I think all Ron Paul supporters are actually supporters of the American system. They just don't understand that Ron Paul doesn't support the American system.
What is the American System anyway? LaRouche is the man teaching it.
LaRoucheisright 2 years ago
The US no longer has a National Bank. The powers of Congress to create money were turned over to the Federal Reserve Board and the Neo-cons of the Republican party deregulated the banks in the 80's. Ron Paul is a Constitutionalist and believes in the limited powers of the Federal Government as set fourth by the Constitution which are the Federal Gov, is to coin money and regulate the value there of and to provide a military and to guarantee to the states a republican form of Government
chinasherry1961 2 years ago 2
Yes, and I (though I am not a LaRouchite) appreciate Paul for this.
However, he is opposed to ANY National Bank in the Jacksonian tradition and supports Austrian economics, which actually are supported by many of the world's economic elites and partly imposed undemocratically via IMF/World Bank/globalisation treaties.
So I love Ron Paul for his honesty and integrity, but his solutions will NOT reverse course!
maxime32 2 years ago 2
the first national bank was a private bank identical to the federal reserve. The first one being abolished by Andrew Jackson
ExposingUncleSham 2 years ago
Explained clearly. Thanks. Now if only congress could spare 11 minutes and learn. Thank you.
tenagliac 2 years ago
Haha ok I changed the title. Listen to the video before you jump to conclusions.
LaRoucheisright 2 years ago
Share this video ! Educate your friends on the principles this nation was founded on and what indeed made it great. And listen to wierdjoe he is a wise man.
LaRoucheisright 2 years ago
The lead up to the constitution, and it's implementation were all made possible by Alexander Hamilton... start watching the video and ignore the poor choice of a title, and you all might learn some real history. BORROWED ON THE CREDIT OF THE UNITED STATES! not borrowed on debt. to a private bank.
It would take a strong central government to implement that sort of standard... you could do that and still be for a smaller state than we have. stop being victims of polarized debate.
weirdjoei 2 years ago
Yes. Whatever protects the rights of Working American Citizens.
PilatusPorterPC6 2 years ago
How would we go about ending the Federal Reserve & going back to the way the Constitution intended our economy to be based?
Extradition606 2 years ago
Militia
KamikazeKoscki 2 years ago
I don't understand why people are upset. It was pretty obvious that there were alot of differences. For example LaRouche or his followers believe in a central government while Ron Paul is for decentralize. Why do you think they always bring up Hamilton and dislike Jefferson?
I guess it just takes a rude title to make it more obvious.
Seiku 2 years ago
This is funny. hahaha You tube changing the view numbers by the hour hahaha.
LaRoucheisright 2 years ago
I agree. I can't believe that they are saying Ron Paul is an idiot! This pisses me off! He wants to audit the fed. I may un subscribe to la rouche after this BS!!! I don't know ALL the facts but I have listened to Dr. Paul and he speaks the truth as far as I can tell? Please, let me know if I am missing something and also, have proof of it. Don't slam me for questioning either as I am asking why la rouche is saying these things?
PilatusPorterPC6 2 years ago 4
I am taking the initiative to get this title removed and changed as we speak. I ask that you kind folk forgive the title and consider what the LaRouche camp has to offer as well as what the Paul camp is doing.
ClintfromNYtoVA 2 years ago
that's my point.
LaRoucheisright 2 years ago
Fools, the reason why free market is non existent is because the money manipulators dont allow it to be a free market in the first place. If there was ever a real free market there would be no banks, the government will be almost non-existent and many politicians will be useless. Its rather sad to continue to have this debate, whether we need a private central bank or a national bank, paper money or gold coins. This is all in the past, our civ needs an upgrade. Look for the Venus Project.
JAGUARWARRIOR21 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Indeed Austrian Economics is Un-American.
artpink 2 years ago
Ron Paul is a good man, but an idealist in the most extreme sense.
History would only provide the answers to that statement. We need a strong state, to override Empire, empire isnt a nation, a people, or anything of the sort, it's usuary of money, oligarchs, and financiers of all sorts, that subsume the authority of the state. It's been the same empire since the revolution, to this present day the "british" empire which has its venetian roots.
weirdjoei 2 years ago 2
praised*
A lot of this actually stems from miseducation, and manipulation, divide and conquer. Free market idealism sounds good to a lot of people, but they need to be informed there is no such thing as a free market, and it's the means of control, and the heart of an invisible empire.
Hamilton was infact correct, but big vs small government extends much further than monetary policy, and the Hamiltons and Jeffersons of today need to come together against the financiers.
weirdjoei 2 years ago 3
this title does nothing but create a divide, Lyndon Larouche however has even prasided Ron Pauls honesty, and guts on the air while talking to Jack Stockwell's radio show.
the federalists, and the anti's have never found a common ground for the defense of this country, and it's obvious, and the slanders on both parts here are evidence of why.... it's time to find a common enemy and a common ground people.
weirdjoei 2 years ago 4
I appeal to your better conscience. A title like this does no good. Please remove this thread and retitle this more appropriately and reconsider any Paul bashing.
ClintfromNYtoVA 2 years ago 6
sorry man I'm sick of this shit.
We need the "American system"
Ron Paul supports the "Austrian system"
on top of that he holds to the idea that this system is fixable. We must replace this system. LaRouche is the man calling for that, and ron paul probably can't even pronounce his name. If Ron Paul will sign on to the Dingell Bill calling for a Pecora Commission then I will retract my polemic. Mike Hodgkiss
LaRoucheisright 2 years ago
LaRouche is for communism.
freightmaster2 2 years ago
I still think if Paul and LaRouche can get together and work on ideas the possibilities would be endless. I dont think the LaRouche camp would be so brash to call Paul an idiot. RonPauI is very sincere, so I would sincerely hope not.
ClintfromNYtoVA 2 years ago 4
what makes Ron Paul an Idiot based on this video? The idea of credit system vs this fiat system we have now? I think you guys are not getting your points across very well and just upset that Ron Paul is becoming more main stream vs your nonFederal socialist ideas not gaining ground. sad.
HHODork 2 years ago 6
@HHODork we're humans more than individuals. what makes one to say that he is more entitled to better health care or education by simply relying on his/her wallet. those are basic human and civil necessities. ron paul is not for the belief of "We the People" where everyone's basic human necessities are recognized. he's for the belief of social darwinism "Doesn't matter what's your situation, it's your own fault, and you're on your own"
phenomenalclassic93 4 months ago