It's wonderful to hear this piece performed by Prokofiev. Is this recording available? I would love to hear the entirety of Op. 4 as performed by the composer.
Il appartient de retoucher deux cornes au portrait de Prokofiev, ha-ha!
Mais habituellement je parle russe. Tu es juste, on doit publier ses commentaires en anglais. C'est pourquoi j'écris la description du video en anglais, français, russe --- afin que tu et beau monde français pourraient me comprendre.
@nairigrigorian Exacto, pero no del todo cierto, Rachmaninov no le era tan fiel así mismo. Escucha sus grabaciones con partitura en amno y te darás cuenta de que no. Prokofiev tocaba exactamente como lo había escrito, eso es indiscutible.
@noeneonpiano and would you post a video of you at age 12 in comparison to this? When I was 14 I played Brahms piano sonata op. 5, but I would never compare myself to any great pianist playing it, especially not the composer. Ridiculous comment.
I could only stand a short blast of Richter's playing. It's a charicature, totally out of character from what this incredible version by the composer shows us.
Well, with these older recordings, one can never be sure about the tone created by the instrument. The sound is muffled, distorted, and rather compressed, so it's difficult to compare. That being said, this piece calls for banging and barbarism. It is, after all, a diabolical suggestion, and that implies ferocity.
The diabolique implies that, but the first half of the title - Suggestion - implies that the brutality should not be outright. In this respect I prefer Prokofiev's performance. Richter's rendition is more like the Statement Diabolique.
Well, the title is translated from the Russian, so be careful about reading too much into it. Наваждение is more like a possession, or the feeling that something evil has passed through you. It's more obsessive and delusional than suggestive.
I can´t agree with you. Richter was one of Prokofiev´s favorites pianists. Besides Prokofiev dedicated works to him, lije te 9th sonate. Richter lecture of this work is quite different, ok, but is wonderful! I invite you to visit my profile and listen an other excellent performance of this masterwork, by Antonietta Rudge (1885-1974), I posted it . I hope you enjoy it.
I remember someone playing this at a recital. I was blown away that day. It was like when I was 7. I never looked it up until now. I'm glad I found it again.
Well, I've written for violin, cello, and flute, and I can't play for any of those instruments. :) And yes I can see that it's a while back, it just came to my mind.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
without meaning anything in a bad way, i think that prokofiev wrote the ugliest music ever... it reminds me of beethovens grosse fugue. but as beethoven's fugue, he makes his music so that in it's uglyness its beautifull! it is amazing... 5 stars
amazing to hear the "real" interpretation, the way it was conceived in the composer's own head.
the intro is played much faster than the average interpretation you hear today, the rest sounds pretty close, so it's good to know contemporary pianists are pretty true to the composer's intent.
Dear NGS, You mean a piano piece of course, I think in most cases the composers knew how to play it but not as a rule, it seems that Berlioz could not play the piano (not much pianomusic either) Beethoven composed while (partly) deaf and Schumann broke his fingers on his own opus 3 I believe, but in general, and certainly in the case of Prokofiev I think the composers were fine players of their own music
suzette: I know, I'm just saying it would be odd if a composer couldn't. I realize that MANY composers were also known as fine pianists in their times.
NGS, I agree, I'm not sure but what you (also) seemed to imply is that a lot of composing of pianomusic is/ was done at the piano,it probably was (I'm not a pianist) hence my three examples, kind regards, Suzette
I read once that Schubert found it hard to get through his 'Wanderer' Fantasy - a more recent, and better example would be Tippett, who I believe (I'm open to correction here) was no kind of instrumentalist, and, very aware that some of his piano writing was impractical, was happy that pianists make some adjustments.
Ravel was terrible player and couldn't play have his music, and the afore mentioned Balakirev could not play his whole Islamey. Schumann hurt his hands in a crazy finger extension machine of his (the guy was mad) and so his wife played all his music.
Charming little piece :) Prokofiev is one of my favourite composers. I'm surprised that smithsherman hasn't yet criticised his "technicaly foul and interpretationaly immature" performance (or something like it..) ;P
Don't worry about that. The guy that said Prokofiev has nothing to do with jazz is full of shit. He had hundreds of jazz albums in his collection, he admired Gershwin's music, and he had plenty of exposure to it during his trips to the US and in western Europe. He doesn't use jazz as obviously as Ravel, maybe, but anyone who's listened to his Romeo and Juliet knows that jazz seeped into his work here and there.
Part of his problem was that after his return to the Soviet Union in 1936, writing music that hinted at the jazz idiom was a no-no, a sign of Western decadence, and Papa Stalin might send violators off to Siberia.
This particular piece was written early in Prokofiev's career and it probably "has nothing to do with jazz". You're probably responding to his heavy use of syncopation which you might interpret as a "jazz-like" rhythm. It's a perfectly legitimate point to make. Azerty, like most people on YouTube, is an idiot and thinks he's giving you a terse, sophisticated put-down. For people who know about Prok, he just looks like a fool.
artie: Thanks. I hate it when people are so close-minded to other opinions (like azerty was) whether it's in music, art, literature, politics, and so on. Some people just love the idea that they're superior to another person.
artie: Prokofiev is mainly stressing the strong beats (the first and the third), because he wrote accents there...but he sure loved jazz, that's true. In Ravel's music there is much more jazz-influence (violin sonata).
A perfect example of jazzy syncopations you find in Schumann's Toccata...
It's wonderful to hear this piece performed by Prokofiev. Is this recording available? I would love to hear the entirety of Op. 4 as performed by the composer.
20somethingstories 5 months ago
Sounds just the way Prokofiev himself would play it!
Vesivian 6 months ago
@Vesivian I can't imagine why that would be.
DHKKLGG 3 months ago
@Vesivian That's true!!!
Youkali67 3 months ago
@Vesivian didn't profofiev play it in this recording?
starwarsmuzakjl 2 months ago in playlist More videos from theoshow2
pardon mais je ne suis pas fr,je suis belge ;)
Shostakovichforever 6 months ago
i've always found that everybody should speak english here...me normally i speak french but i speak english,so everybody can understand me...
Shostakovichforever 6 months ago
@Shostakovichforever
Il appartient de retoucher deux cornes au portrait de Prokofiev, ha-ha!
Mais habituellement je parle russe. Tu es juste, on doit publier ses commentaires en anglais. C'est pourquoi j'écris la description du video en anglais, français, russe --- afin que tu et beau monde français pourraient me comprendre.
f1f1s 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@jorpianist You're using google translate?
I can't understand, sorry. So I'm gonna flag all your comments as spam because we can't understand them, foot-worshipper.
Santosificationable 7 months ago
@jorpianist Wow. Someone doesn't speak english very well.
nleguellec 7 months ago
porque los pianistas cambian el texto de los grandes compositores???...menos mal q tenemos el testimonio de los mismos autores!!! gracias Sergei...
nairigrigorian 8 months ago
@nairigrigorian Exacto, pero no del todo cierto, Rachmaninov no le era tan fiel así mismo. Escucha sus grabaciones con partitura en amno y te darás cuenta de que no. Prokofiev tocaba exactamente como lo había escrito, eso es indiscutible.
Youkali67 3 months ago 2
@jorpianist hahaha you're funny.
Scorpio7500 8 months ago
@jorpianist "The worst version ever" - played by the man who wrote it himself.
Now that doesn't really make sense now, does it?
Tribute1875 8 months ago
Fascinating.
gerardbedecarter 9 months ago
WEE imma have fun playing this though I'll sound like crap in comparison. But the haunting melody is so awesome
MrCha360194 9 months ago
@jorpianist wow are you retarded this is the composer playing his own piece. This is how he meant it to be played.
Scorpio7500 9 months ago
the sudden drop in dynamic at about 2:04 always makes me all giddy:D
MetroidMilkMan 10 months ago
@jorpianist how this is prokofievs own version you might have heard other incorrct or not as close as this awesome performance so back off
ttslipknotrulez132 10 months ago
He was the Man of Steel. He felt no pain, not even on those huge 4 octaves-a-second runs at the end. :D
Flutist11 10 months ago
Prokofiev scares me....not just the music, his face :D
F1R1NMAHLAZAH 1 year ago 4
More than "diabolique" his performance is "a persistent nightmare" (the real meaning of the title.
jafigueroa41 1 year ago
Marvellous version.
SophieMenter 1 year ago
...this song is so hard... he makes it sound like nothing.
izzallgud 1 year ago 7
I can just imagine Ana Yesipova's response to this brilliant and diabolical performance! (:-D) WOW!
Noshirm 1 year ago
Excellent idea... I wonder if there was any particular "suggestion" on his mind. ;-)
Flutist11 1 year ago
Comment removed
noeneonpiano 1 year ago
yes...quite an amazing piece...i played this before
~12 years old :)~
noeneonpiano 1 year ago
Comment removed
lorditachijr 1 year ago
Comment removed
noeneonpiano 1 year ago
what i meant was that WHEN i was 12...i played this..
noeneonpiano 1 year ago
@noeneonpiano and would you post a video of you at age 12 in comparison to this? When I was 14 I played Brahms piano sonata op. 5, but I would never compare myself to any great pianist playing it, especially not the composer. Ridiculous comment.
awsomed89 1 year ago
i played this song...it was painful...the NINTHS
Dotatime 2 years ago 5
Richter the best for Prokofiev ever!!
pabloj08 2 years ago
I could only stand a short blast of Richter's playing. It's a charicature, totally out of character from what this incredible version by the composer shows us.
2ndviolinist 1 year ago
The truth is, Prokofief held Richter and his play in very high esteem. :-0
silverbud 1 year ago 6
From 1:00 to 1:10 it's the devil himself playing....
1978christos 2 years ago 4
amazing !i totaly aagree
karazh 1 year ago
unbeleavable! it should be prokoffievs op 666
klausknulp 2 years ago 93
most definitely!!!
ReturnOfTheStienway 2 years ago
@klausknulp LOL!!! xD
nousernamewhatsoever 1 year ago
beautiful pianosound
dsyglym 2 years ago 8
it is good played and really devlish :)
pinnock1000 2 years ago 9
Much nicer tone than Richter. Richter seems to "bang", Prokofiev attacks the piano without making a harsh tone.
CodyNelsonMusic 2 years ago 10
Well, with these older recordings, one can never be sure about the tone created by the instrument. The sound is muffled, distorted, and rather compressed, so it's difficult to compare. That being said, this piece calls for banging and barbarism. It is, after all, a diabolical suggestion, and that implies ferocity.
coasterman16 2 years ago 2
The diabolique implies that, but the first half of the title - Suggestion - implies that the brutality should not be outright. In this respect I prefer Prokofiev's performance. Richter's rendition is more like the Statement Diabolique.
demosj 2 years ago 37
Well, the title is translated from the Russian, so be careful about reading too much into it. Наваждение is more like a possession, or the feeling that something evil has passed through you. It's more obsessive and delusional than suggestive.
picotheman2 2 years ago 5
@demosj nevertheless, one should not forget that the title is not by Prokofiev in the first place...
godelike 1 year ago
@demosj ain't nothing bad about a diabolic statement .
sunamiassault 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Banging is for the bedroom!!!!
Bruce88keys 2 years ago
I can´t agree with you. Richter was one of Prokofiev´s favorites pianists. Besides Prokofiev dedicated works to him, lije te 9th sonate. Richter lecture of this work is quite different, ok, but is wonderful! I invite you to visit my profile and listen an other excellent performance of this masterwork, by Antonietta Rudge (1885-1974), I posted it . I hope you enjoy it.
bernardocarmopiano 2 years ago 6
I think he didnt understand the composers intention =D
gdjuniform 2 years ago 8
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Exact. Those only-pianoplayers are simply poor. ;-)
telvierundachtzig 2 years ago
Grrr, he makes this sound so easy to play!
0majtyna0 2 years ago 8
Brilliant! I especially love 1:17
I wish somebody could compile all of the 'Prokofiev Plays Prokofiev' pieces and upload them somewhere.
WdUoGyGlLeErS 2 years ago 6
I'm doing my composer project on this guy and lemme say : Hes da man!
clubpenguinfan99 2 years ago 8
A remarkable treasure! Thank you so much for sharing this! It has excellent quality considering it's age...and such a "devilish" little piece!
OriginalMoonbeam 2 years ago 2
I think this one is better than richters. He knows the piece better by himself.
zealotpolly 2 years ago 5
finally a good recording of this! there are way to many kids who play this and destroy it.
MillyProductions 2 years ago 2
well no duh its good, its the composer playing so its most likely going to be better than many kids.
ihrtmusic12334 2 years ago
UNA JOYITA!!!
La versión del mismo Prokofiev se muestra mucho más obscura, siendo muy coherente con el nombre de la pieza.
Sirtnat 3 years ago 2
Seems like satan really suggested him the notes to play,it's fascinating
strangehands89 3 years ago 11
I can feel diabolic suggestions going through me right now. A fitting name for a wonderful piece.
RSFREAK969 3 years ago 9
I remember someone playing this at a recital. I was blown away that day. It was like when I was 7. I never looked it up until now. I'm glad I found it again.
werq34ac 3 years ago
TRULY diabolic. TRULY infernal and sulfurous! Perfectly played, this packs a mighty punch! Love it! Thanks for this post.
Noshirm 3 years ago 6
This comment has received too many negative votes show
its bad that he/she doesnn't show the actual recording. Rate this a thumbs down if you want.
PokemasterAngus 3 years ago
There isn't a video to accompany it though, since it was recorded audio-only (in 1935 no less!).
demonicadvent 3 years ago 3
Comment removed
ihrtmusic12334 3 years ago
Can someone send me the score pls??
gkypianou 3 years ago
WHAT??!!!! THIS EXISTS?!!!?
oh thank you. thank you so much.
i mean if this is ture.
ibclappin 3 years ago 7
Loved this =) Someone played it during a music lesson awards ceremony me and my bro went to...it was AMAZING
FlowerEmblem 3 years ago 6
This comment has received too many negative votes show
what? so this is bs this isn't Prokofiev himself?
ibclappin 3 years ago
???
FlowerEmblem 3 years ago
This is the best performance of this piece on record.
helloimapianist 3 years ago 8
No way.
weikko79 3 years ago
yes way ^^
There are couple good ones and bunch of really bad ones but this is absolutely the best
ManWithManyShurikens 3 years ago 7
Well, I've written for violin, cello, and flute, and I can't play for any of those instruments. :) And yes I can see that it's a while back, it just came to my mind.
kaelynq 3 years ago 2
This comment has received too many negative votes show
without meaning anything in a bad way, i think that prokofiev wrote the ugliest music ever... it reminds me of beethovens grosse fugue. but as beethoven's fugue, he makes his music so that in it's uglyness its beautifull! it is amazing... 5 stars
johnbaptistlulu 3 years ago
? I don't get it...
FlowerEmblem 3 years ago 2
"diabolique" indeed and i mean it in a good way.
aewanko300 3 years ago 2
In my opinion this is the best recording of this piece that I know of.
jsrwang07 3 years ago 2
amazing to hear the "real" interpretation, the way it was conceived in the composer's own head.
the intro is played much faster than the average interpretation you hear today, the rest sounds pretty close, so it's good to know contemporary pianists are pretty true to the composer's intent.
guitarike 3 years ago 3
GAH! I meant to give it a five and I got a three!
Darklord12356 4 years ago
NGS
When asked to perform Islamey live, Balakirev would always decline..in fact there's no record of him having performed it publicly :)
BreuschPagan 4 years ago
Now there's a good example. I can imagine...;)
suzettegm 4 years ago
Breusch: I've never heard of either 'Islamey' or 'Balakirev'.
NGS712 4 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
USE THE GOOGLE
silvercharcoal5 3 years ago
silver: YOU DON'T NEED TO YELL.
NGS712 3 years ago
omg what gem gem gem gem YES OMG FREAKING GOD YEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEES
4444matthew4444 4 years ago
great rendition, I'm surprised that Pietje Puk has not yet critisised the old fashioned glasses.
suzettegm 4 years ago
suzette: Well it has to be a great rendition, he's playing his own piece! :)
NGS712 4 years ago
Yep.
suzettegm 4 years ago
suzette: It would be weird if a composer wrote a piece and couldn't even play it! I wonder if that's ever happened?
NGS712 4 years ago
Dear NGS, You mean a piano piece of course, I think in most cases the composers knew how to play it but not as a rule, it seems that Berlioz could not play the piano (not much pianomusic either) Beethoven composed while (partly) deaf and Schumann broke his fingers on his own opus 3 I believe, but in general, and certainly in the case of Prokofiev I think the composers were fine players of their own music
suzettegm 4 years ago
suzette: I know, I'm just saying it would be odd if a composer couldn't. I realize that MANY composers were also known as fine pianists in their times.
NGS712 4 years ago
NGS, I agree, I'm not sure but what you (also) seemed to imply is that a lot of composing of pianomusic is/ was done at the piano,it probably was (I'm not a pianist) hence my three examples, kind regards, Suzette
suzettegm 4 years ago
suzette: It was just a random thought.
NGS712 4 years ago
Okay, I see
suzettegm 4 years ago
I read once that Schubert found it hard to get through his 'Wanderer' Fantasy - a more recent, and better example would be Tippett, who I believe (I'm open to correction here) was no kind of instrumentalist, and, very aware that some of his piano writing was impractical, was happy that pianists make some adjustments.
greekyboy123 4 years ago
greeky: Really? Gee, as I said it was just a random though. Had no idea it would have basis in fact! ;)
NGS712 4 years ago
Ravel was terrible player and couldn't play have his music, and the afore mentioned Balakirev could not play his whole Islamey. Schumann hurt his hands in a crazy finger extension machine of his (the guy was mad) and so his wife played all his music.
serox901 4 years ago
serox: Who is Balakirev? Honestly, I didn't think people would actually take what I said seriously enough to respond! :)
Thanks!
NGS712 4 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I doubt that I was always taught that Schubert was an amazing pianist
vantrifan 2 years ago
huh?
MillyProductions 2 years ago
lol my last comment was a reply to an old comment, that said somewhere they learned that Schubert had trouble playing his own pieces.
vantrifan 2 years ago
i think he did, because he was still learning when he wrote some of them. but you can't be sure. iether way his standchen is wonderful.
MillyProductions 2 years ago
Anyone who ever wrote for an instrument he/she didn't know how to play.
kaelynq 3 years ago
kael: What do you mean?
Besides that was just a random thought I had awhile back.
NGS712 3 years ago
kael meant that compared to this, no one else ever knew how to compose music
FlowerEmblem 3 years ago 2
i know this comment was made one month ago but that's not what i meant.
kaelynq 3 years ago
ugh...sorry ^.^''..
FlowerEmblem 3 years ago
Charming little piece :) Prokofiev is one of my favourite composers. I'm surprised that smithsherman hasn't yet criticised his "technicaly foul and interpretationaly immature" performance (or something like it..) ;P
pjkorab 4 years ago 2
It's like 'Danse Macabre' but with a more Jazz-like rhythm to it.
NGS712 4 years ago
prokofiev has nothing to do with jazz
azerty9120222 4 years ago
azerty: I didn't say it was jazz, but had the rhythm. The fast pace of the piece. Geez can't believe I got -3 for a compliment!
NGS712 4 years ago
Don't worry about that. The guy that said Prokofiev has nothing to do with jazz is full of shit. He had hundreds of jazz albums in his collection, he admired Gershwin's music, and he had plenty of exposure to it during his trips to the US and in western Europe. He doesn't use jazz as obviously as Ravel, maybe, but anyone who's listened to his Romeo and Juliet knows that jazz seeped into his work here and there.
artie6666 4 years ago
Part of his problem was that after his return to the Soviet Union in 1936, writing music that hinted at the jazz idiom was a no-no, a sign of Western decadence, and Papa Stalin might send violators off to Siberia.
artie6666 4 years ago
This particular piece was written early in Prokofiev's career and it probably "has nothing to do with jazz". You're probably responding to his heavy use of syncopation which you might interpret as a "jazz-like" rhythm. It's a perfectly legitimate point to make. Azerty, like most people on YouTube, is an idiot and thinks he's giving you a terse, sophisticated put-down. For people who know about Prok, he just looks like a fool.
artie6666 4 years ago
artie: Thanks. I don't know much about classical, so I was just giving a compliment based on what I know. What does syncopation mean necessarily?
NGS712 4 years ago
It's a rhythmic displacement. In other words, Prokofiev stresses beats that would normally be unstressed.
artie6666 4 years ago 3
artie: Thanks. I hate it when people are so close-minded to other opinions (like azerty was) whether it's in music, art, literature, politics, and so on. Some people just love the idea that they're superior to another person.
NGS712 4 years ago
artie: Prokofiev is mainly stressing the strong beats (the first and the third), because he wrote accents there...but he sure loved jazz, that's true. In Ravel's music there is much more jazz-influence (violin sonata).
A perfect example of jazzy syncopations you find in Schumann's Toccata...
pianopera 4 years ago 3
I agree with you to a certain extent, but even in the areas where the beat is straight forward, there is a lot of phrasing across the bar-line.
artie6666 4 years ago
Awesome
Thanks for sharing
dabiribd 4 years ago 5