Steve, would it be correct to say Walras' law is consistent with Schumpeter's views on "initiation of new procuts/production methods" if the total market is considered to incorporate sectors separated from each other in time, i.e. whatever surplus of demand exists in a past stage can be matched to a deficit of demand in a future stage signifying the taking on and repayment of a debt? or does this lead to a kind of infinite regress where the "final" repayment is never made?
@heckler73 After. Schumpeter is a great economist but a rather convoluted writer. I think he'll make more sense after reading Debunking Economics II than before.
What about entrepreneurs who don't borrow money?
KenMacMillan 3 months ago in playlist Behavioural Finance Lectures
Steve, would it be correct to say Walras' law is consistent with Schumpeter's views on "initiation of new procuts/production methods" if the total market is considered to incorporate sectors separated from each other in time, i.e. whatever surplus of demand exists in a past stage can be matched to a deficit of demand in a future stage signifying the taking on and repayment of a debt? or does this lead to a kind of infinite regress where the "final" repayment is never made?
LCTesla 3 months ago
@anyone, really...
Would it be better to read Schumpeter's "Theory of Economic Development" before, or after "Debunking Economics II" ???
heckler73 4 months ago
@heckler73 After. Schumpeter is a great economist but a rather convoluted writer. I think he'll make more sense after reading Debunking Economics II than before.
ProfSteveKeen 4 months ago