Bill O Reilly, somebody needs to kill this guy, and im serious. I will cut his balls off and shove them up his mouth, and then burn his whole body alive. I will kill everybody in the CIA and US Government, if i had the weapons and power. But we need to come together and kill them. Fuck martial law, and fuck New world order
Isn't it true that much of PM advertising revenue comes from US military and defense contractors? If you believe that is not a conflict of interests, you're a fool. Also, incriminating facts and data that are withheld in themselves create a lie, by omission.
if you were accused of firing a missile into the pentagon, and your defence was "no it was a plane, it melted on impact and disappeared" i think you would get fast tracked to the mental asylum.
O'riley is an IDIOT...I have never seen such an ignorant person who wants WAR and never served but wants to send our kids to war because he is a propaganda pusher who brings on guys like pop mech Jim M who has degree in "Philosophy" and does not bring in Physicists...Duh wake up people it is the BIG LIE Hilter talked of
@andyOsalek 15 of the 19 hi jackers were saudi nationals. atta was the leader. bin ladin claimed responsibility on that video where he looked pale and sickly looking. that video was translated by al-jeezra.
How could this be!!!??? There are actually people out there that believe otherwise than the almighty Bill O'Reilley?? Preposterous!! They must be pinheads because they don't think like Bill the patriot.
Yes, the wings are not as substantial as the main part of the jet but the engines themselves weighed TONS... did they just disappear somehow against the "bunker-like" building? bullshit - they need to work on their story a little more.
james miegs'' the real suprise is that buildings stood up as long as they did'' wat a disgracefull lier, these motherfuckers need waterboarding done on them
fire does not bring steel framed buildings down in their own foot prints, if fire were to do this it would have to remove each critical core column in a precisely timed manor. Fire can not do that, these buildings fell through the path of greatest resistance - period. Explain BBC & CNN reporting building 7 collapsing 15 minutes before it actually happened. Your being conditioned by controlled news to be an aid in tyranny, if you don't ask questions, your helping to destroy America.
@KyleCom Fires have brought down many steel framed buildings. The difference here is the fires were in 2 of the biggest buildings in the world. The fire was certainly hot enough to weaken the frame of the building beyond its ability to support itself. The collapse began when you saw the top start to tip, then the opposite side support columns snapped which were acting as the fulcrum of the rotation, thus the tipping stops and the downward fall begins resulting in a global collapse.
Alright, well thanks for your calm reply despite my previous reply.
My problem is that these buildings clearly fell through the path of greatest resistance, it's just far too hard for a fire to make not one, but three buildings fall strait down into their own foot print, and these buildings did.
Check out Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth, Richard Gage has done a wonderful job putting this stuff together.
With false flags in history, who can blame people for being skeptical..
sorry but i find popular mechanics, with the actual research they do more believable than Jason & Dylans high school project known as Loose Change, which involves no research at all..
@jutsin928 9/11 was NOT an inside job. There are people that WITNESSED the plane hit the Pentagon. The WTC was not part of a control demolition because in a control demolition, the building would fall from the bottom up. In the WTC situation, the building fell from the TOP down basically where the impact of the plane occured and finally Building 7 was not a conventional skyscraper and had enormous trusses carrying high loads. The fires burned for a long time and ultimately the building collapsed
@preving dude I know!, I think u misread my comments, cuz I'm on your side!!
I know what happened, I watched it LIVE on tv!.. lol, U thought I was one of those conspiracy theory nut jobs!!!
I know 9/11 wasn't an inside job, but some people (usually those with tinfoil headgear wrapped around their heads, cutting off rational thought) always have their BS theories and can't except facts.
Like people who say "We've never even landed on the moon maaan" Goddamn hippies!!
oreilly plays a great mental game for those who are aware at 2:49
"so theres absolutely no evidence in both wtc or pentag. that anything happened that was stunning to the analysts who after the fact examined it,correct?
If you had asked me if I thought it was a conspiracy back in 2001-2003 I would have been one of the 64% - why would I have any doubt's as to what I see on the news.
After everything I have watched and read, and investigated myself, Popular Mechanics have not a scrap of scientific evidence in any of their videos or books. They try to cleverly avoid the facts.. "the plane was more like liquid than solid".. ahh, that's how the engines disappeared!!
If you had asked me if I thought it was a conspiracy back in 2001-2003 I would have been one of the 64% - why would I have any doubt's as to what I see on the news.
After everything I have watched and read, and investigated myself, Popular Mechanics have not a scrap of scientific evidence in any of their videos or books. They try to cleverly avoid the facts.. "the plane was more like liquid than solid".. ahh, that's how the engines disappeared!!
If one wants to learn about the character, credibility, and trustworthiness of James Meigs and Popular Mechanics, one can do no better than to use one's favorite web browser and search the following phrases:
popular mechanics' deceptive smear against 9/11 truth
Also I like it how "unbiased" the "news" anchor is when askin gthe questions. Viewers of FOX, look at newschannels all around the world using internet and compare... might open your eyes. I have my hopes on internet....
Populat Mechanics are soo full of it and I bet they know it... What I can't understand is not why those 36% are in doubt despite "news" stations like fox, but how anybody can believe in James here. i hope the expression "what goes around..." has any truth too it!
That tool might want to go to A&E truth he just got debunked! 90 foot hole, yea right! the hole is not much bigger than the fire apparatus cell phones in 2001 didn't work at high altitudes that's why in 2003 the airlines put towers on the planes. Bill O'Reilly is a tool!
Inside job, wtc 7, controlled demolition, put options, nano thermite, free fall, , rebuilding americans defense, new pearl harber, larry silverstein pull it, (insurance), 9/11 comission, whistle blowers, witnesses, no black boxes but yes we,ve got the passport, patriot act, gaspipe, opium, nwo, cia o no bin ladin (familie) swine flow, media controlls-black out, end the list endless.
Wow, this meigs guy is something else, "the hole in the pentagon was 90 feet," flat out lie. Meigs says"the cell phones worked fine," thats not what he said in a debate with the loose change crew on democracy now. He said " we did'nt say the cell phones worked well but they did work." What a liar!!!!!!!!
Notice how he didn't examine the government's ethical practices before and after 9/11. Any true scientist wont put a sticker price on true knowledge. Look at how much you can learn about evolution for free versus the U.S. history's most debated event. I want to see the how many engineers support his theory, its not fact if there is not any OTHER editor besides his self, sources for other proven novels, and skeptics form every realm.
Actually NASA satellite photos prove molten steel existed, FEMA also documented molten steel and countless first responders speak of it as well. You also have the world trade center rock made up of molten steel and even video and photo evidence.
Go ahead and be a sheep, contribute to tyranny and help American's live in tyranny, your doing a fine job you disgrace to humanity.
@KyleCom Your sources are mis leading you. Nasa photos cant show you molten "steel". They can show you how hot the area is though.
People like you say molten steel and what you mean is molten metal which is a huge difference. There was plenty of molten metal at the site consisting of aluminum and various alloys of aluminum. No steel however until the clean up effort began.
The people who fling the word "sheep" around always seem to be the least educated on here.
And to people like you. I say, enjoy the patriot act that you help to support!
I'm not even American and I care more about your constitution then you do, your rights are being taken away because of a false flag, and you think that things are fine and dandy because your television told you so.
Go watch some more BBC & CNN, the other sheep are waiting.
@KyleCom just because I dont believe there were missiles and phantom planes doesnt mean i love the patriot act. In fact the patriot act is one of the worst things thats happened to this country in a long time.
But to say that there were no planes, that no debris was found at the pentagon, that explosives were used at WTC is just ignorant to anyone with the least amount of healthy skepticism.
@judgerofwars "the twin towers collapsed on top of them" ... OK well that has been proven false. Apparently you like to create your own version of reality.
I hate this guy! Hes says a plane wont leave a "cartoon cut out" in the pentagon, which is only concrete, but some how it left one in the WTC...also I think four eyes should look at scientific proof himself. Jet fuel wont melt steel...I think hes the one who opposes the proof.
Popular Mechanics are owned by "Hearst Publishing" who are owned by "General Electric" who also own "NBC" and "Lockhead-Martin" who have some very profitable weapons contracts in the these wars. They also own "A & E" and the "History Channel"
Lynn Cheney works for "Lockhead-Martin" and she is married to the forner Vice President (Dick Cheney) who formerly worked for "Halliburton" who also have some very profitable contracts in these wars.
No its these news people, and the Popular Mechanics people the "explain it in a fancy way" to make it sound more true, but its the lie, 9/11 Inside Job!!!
This isn't BULL-SHIT....this is BiLL-SHIT, hahah...9-11-01 was an inside job!!! I'll sing it to the day I die !!! Fuck the corporate mass media and their spin doctor bullshit! The evidence is there, because the mass media says otherwise, most dumb asses that can't think for themselves scratch their head and think "well the news on tv says 9-11-01 was not an inside job" - so I'll just go back to sleep. WAKE UP, Obama ain't gonna change shit, he will be just like Bush. we need revolution!
Nobody listens to us people? what about your own Andreas von Bülow , having served 20+ years as an SPD member of German Parliament? I guess he's misled too, it doesn't matter how many facts that are put up, the mass denial is just too fuckin thick to cut through.
This is crap ... for one thing when asked about the speed of fall he didn't actually debunk the speed of fall ... he just said it wouldn't topple over, there was no mention of the explosive nature of the collapses or building 7 or the cover up of evidence or anything like that... and of course, like most debunkers they associate us with the no planers ... and the most interesting thing about the pentagon isn't the size of the hole, its the fact they're withholding 84 fucking videos!
Bill O'Reilly very GULLIBLE, very BLIND, or part of the deception since he is with the big brother controlled media.
It's kind of ridiculous for him to think that we should accept his word just because he's Billy-O the news guy. How much intelligence does it take to read a cue card?
Did anyone else notice that the popular mechanics guy did nothing but offer his opinion without any PROOF to back it up?
Everything he said was CONJECTURE and SPECULATION. NO FACTS!
This person named 'popular mechanics' is only popular, but not inteligent. He hasn't any contrargument to 'conspiracy'. There are a lot of evidences of controlled demolitions. There is a lot of questions didn't answer by goverment, why?
PM made fools of themselves. If it wasn't 4 the fact that I personally saw videos of demolition n structural physics experts from outside the U.S. say the WTC especially building 7 couldn't possibly be anything other than controlled demolition with thermite charges then I would of believed the bullshit the PM guy is spewing in this video. He just bold face lies about no experts contradicting the official 9/11 documentation when there are tons of experts right here on youtube saying the opposite.
Ha ha people don't want to believe there are evil people in the world cut to the devils face in the smoke at 3.38 Attempted Mind control. I agree with person bellow you can use hypnotic inflection in your speech which is a tactic salesmen often use. It is rhythmical speaking which is hypnotic and kind of calming for the sheeple.
I watched a guy do a test with cell phones on airplane. At 6000ft. all 3 brands he tested from 3 top cell co. all had no signal! this guy is a bold face lier!and i heard no scientific eviedence to prove nothing. all he does is talk out his ass, like us folks are stupid.sorry im not convinced 19 arabs with box cutters did all this damage, and out foxed USA air defence systems.
I had a friend who studied hypnotism. He spoke with much the same tones and inflections as these two when he would try to control.
Things like "It is only right that I sleep with your 16 year old girlfriend." "It is wrong of you to think that I shouldnt have sex with you 16 year old girlfiend" "How could you live with yourself with the knowledge that you denied me the right to have sex daily with your 16 year old girlfriend"
I agree, a lot of their information can be debunked thoroughly by scholars of the 9/11 Truth Movement, in particular David Ray Griffin, who has published a book entitled "Debunking 9/11 Debunking" where he debunks the debunkers on the 9/11 conspiracy and his chapter on Popular Mechanics has alone 100 pages of debunking information. I highly recommend this book.
he keep contridicin him self they went into wtc,they were heavy dence plANES,then the pent,they were soft alum tubes,how does that make any sence,pop mech,govt owned,and paid for!
hahaha meigs makes me sick in the stomach. he is sitting there trembling like a schoolboy bitch as he dribbles out the brainwashing pre-prepared crap. they avoid every single issue
steel fall in piece after fire... Plane turn into liquid after hiting building... fact are fact they are political cuz they are not doing what people think but just white wash for this mathers.
"On the internet it started right?" - Thats right billo, attack the internet. Imagine if the internet was stripped of free speech and then the Patriot Act was broadened to encompass the web. Scary man, just scary.
When someone right of the bat comes out calling you names like "nutty" "stupid" "garbage" and doesn't address the issue at hand you tend to wonder why he avoids the real thing
Cell phones "Work fine" in aeroplanes? Absolute total lie. These guys claim to speak to experts in the backroom and then come out and just make shit up. That guy Meigs will be tried and executed for treason one day. Mark my word.
"This is the most closely studied collapse in history" - only a true statement because of the 9/11 Truth Movement. NIST just finally admitted that they can't explain how the towers came down so quickly and never tried to model it. This guy is a Zionist jew liar. "1000s of engineers"??? What a fucking lie. You won't find 10 who support the official story.
look who hes tellin this shit to,Bill that guy fights all his guest,but to this asshole hes actin like hes speakin the gospel.Unbelvable,we need a team of experts with NO govt,or finical ties to govt or corp. involded to do a REAl studie of 9/11!!
Ur focusing on the wrong items Soda, u shouldn't focus on whether YOU think it's possible or not to rig those towers and 7, but rather on if u think that 3 of those buildings can collapse like that through some fire and partial asymmetrical damage.
All these specific characteristics are very well explainable with a CD-hypothesis. Not really (or should I say very badly) with a gravity-hypothesis.
Just shows to me how foolish u are, and how far away from reality u are.
U choose to live in a fantasyworld, where govt. and big corporations tell the truth, and large steel structures totally destruct themselves with the greatest of ease.
Who's talking about impulse and resistance? I think your the one that's lost, your comments don't even make any sense. How am I suppossed 2 show you how insane you are if I can't understand you?
It's a little hard, or actually VERY hard, for all those tons of metal & concrete to collapse so fast when it's being met by an even far GREATER AMOUNT of steel & concrete.
So, the only conspiracy I see is the one that's claiming that all of this intact structure should provide hardly ANY resistance whatsoever.
Whatever dude, I'm not stubborn enough 2 think I can change your mind! Those two buildings took a hit from twin supersonic incendiary bombs and they stood for more than an hour. That might not seem that much, but it is when you have a major conflagration of fire going on inside them. What do you think happened, that some group planted demo 2 bring them down. Maybe if they started wiring 4 months prior to 9/11
Meigs concurs that it's an unprecedented event and yet claims that analysts knew exactly what was going to happen. How could they have known the ins and outs of an event that had never happened before?
Meigs calls the WTC implosion, "The most closely studied collapse in world history," yet fails to address the fact that 50,000 tons of steel from the WTC, a supposed crime scene, was shipped to Asia and a further 10,000 tons to India, preventing a detailed analysis.
Meigs contradicts himself completely in claiming that, "No one had ever seen a one hundred plus story building collapse to the ground before," and yet less than two minutes later agrees with O'Reilly's comment that nothing unexpected about the impact of the planes or the collapses surprised analysts
Tell me, what do u know about conservation of momentum & angular momentum? What do u know about the transfer of energies when 2 objects collide?
If u've done ur homework, u should be able to spot the inconsistencies and false assumptions (made by Bazant) of the official explanation quite easily.
I'm an economics graduate, and even I can spot them with ease.
Its funny that nobody has brought up what you just said. Why is it so hard for people to understand that when tons of metal and concrete start to collapse, there is nothing anyone an do! I should know, I did my english research paper on all those nutty conspiracies.
I like the way this popular mech clown avoid to answer the question of the collaps speed... Yep, 10 seconds, whatever they say, Newton says : controled demolition. Those people are pathetic, they only debunk themselves... And John O'Nazi can go fuck himself !
I am thinking for myself. I am an engineering student, and even though I haven't graduated yet, I can answer a lot of the questions people raise about the attacks. You know, with science and facts. I have done research, only my research goes beyond "Loose Change" and crappy websites that cite the first few days after the attack. Just look in ANY Strength of Materials book and you'll find answers to the stupid "but steel melts at..." bullshit.
They say that they're debunking the "conspiracy theorists" using scientific evidence? Uncited and not even referred to in their arguments? And implying that said theorists aren't also using scientific evidence? Throw in the insulting and derogatory terms they're using and you've got yourself one wagonful of pure bullshit that, frankly, is growing stale.
You all are tools. You keep claiming that you're not going to believe what "they" are telling you. But you'll listen to fucking 20-somethings with access to the internet that post some video or website crying "conspiracy!" Yeah, go on believing you're a free-thinker because you subscribe to someone's fucked-up version of 9/11.
F.Y.I. the hole was 35m wide not 90 feet, where did you even hear that? I just finished a research paper on these stupid myths, I did plenty of research--ON BOTH SIDES!! just so you know I'm not completely biased. Do me a favor and do some legitimate research before you start spreading lies & half-truths about stuff you obviously know nothing about. The plane that hit the Pentagon, was traveling at over 240m per second. Your Welcome
holy crap do they think we are that stupid? I refuse to believe that the american people could be that stupid. There wasn't a single shred of evidence shown. They just kept saying, take are word for it scienctist have proven it. And guess what kiddies they did it with only a small fraction of the evidence.
Notice that at 3:11 Bill O'Reilly lies and says he saw tv coverage of TWA800 crash and that he didn't see any missiles. Funny thing, the only video that caputured the TWA 800 incident was a video made at a wedding reception. That video was seized by the FBI, never shown on tv and the owners never received a copy back from the FBI. Because there was "no" video, the CIA created a $12 million animated recreation of what happened. Google (James Sanders TWA 800)
Davin Coburn gets his ass handed to him by charles goyette. Makes statements that he just can't back up, admits that the evidence that PM saw is not "public" it's a "secret" and we have to take their word for it. Why the sources in their book so messed up?
The plane was traveling at over 240m per second that hit the Pentagon, I am pretty confident they snapped off on impact. You actually think they would stay on going that fast. The reason that 10% was enough to bring down the Towers, was a little think called 'gravity' maybe you've heard of it! Plus, there were some pretty intense flames as well!!
You can take authority over common sense as long as you want, but dont talk down to other people, you sheep.
If you have any faith in the Popular Mechanics people, then i demand you to watch this video of a radio show interviewing Davin Coburn the researcher for Popular Mechanics. and watch both parts.
/watch?v=XLx5GATh_z0&mode=related&search=
if you still think they do serious research, you´re either Delusional or a Fony.
O'Reilly lies at 3:11. Says he saw TWA 800 crash. There was and is no video of this incident. Somebody tell Bill to turn off his vibrator and keep his lies straight.
these bastards are scientists now!!fox and the media is like a fucking jew wedding - of course they gona lie and lie and ask yourself WHAT the fuck is the world coming to? why are these cunts loving the war games, its not even funny, its a disgrace. the rise of hitler and most dont have a clue!!
fuck fox news... bill oreilly is a pathetic, radical neo-con cock sucker. i dont give a shit about his ratings, that doesnt mean shit when your journalism is inaccurately portrayed.
America can film people walking in and out of a factory in Iraq using satelites ..we all saw it on TV when we were told it was a potential chemical warfare production unit.. It turned out to be an asprin factory). BUT the USA can not film a plane smashing into the Pentagon "the film is there it just isnt very good" someone says earlier. If I tried to enter the Pentagon I would be on over a dozen cameras.
The thing is idiots like Bill Oriely are suppose to be asking and getting the answer to questions like these and others but instead they just go with the flow. They are suppose to work for the people not the government, yet who do they work for the Neo-cons and Corporations which is by definition Fascism
This dude is the worst he is a horrible lier at best and Oriely sucks cocks for a living! This guy says..I list the facts." He didn't list ONE fact. Didn't mention one degree of melting points or even go near building 7. His fact sheet keeped refering to cartoons then the jump to TWA flight. Not ONE fact was listed in this interview. I guess that proves everthing
O'Reilly is a sheep. Guess he didn't see Building 7 collapse. It had two small fires on two floors. It looked exactly like a controlled demolition as it fell. In the 9/11 report, there was no mention of Building 7 collapsing. That's quite an oversite. Wake up people, think for yourself!!
I used to have respect for Bill Oreily but I see he has also BEEN BOUGHT OFF to push the lies, look at videos of what plane crashes realy look like the debris left behind, the skid marks they leave on the ground none of what can be found at the pentagon WAKE THE FUKC UP AMERICA
dude usually when planes crash, the people inside are trying to land them as safely as they can. have you ever seen a multiton aircraft crash into anything at 500kts? Come on ......!
are you saying that the attacks were staged? are you saying calls made to faimlies from the planes were staged? are you saying that Osama bin laden admission, a man we cant find, was staged?
What proof are you looking for? Secret Documents linking Bush and Fox news to 9/11?
Where are the Conspiracy Theories linking Pres. Clinton to the Trade Center Bombings, oh right, there arent any
Type in "Seven Unanswered Questions About 9/11, Part 2 of 2" right here on Youtube and see for yourself. It's not me saying the calls can't be made. The Facts are saying it Jav8or
i'll take on one of the "facts" from that clip: Voice synthesizers. in order for "the Big Bad Government" to fake all the calls wouldnt they first have to have all of the voices of people that made calls that day. The Big Bad Government would have to have known months in advance of all the people who would have been on those flights. This in itself strains credibility.
What that video presented wasnt facts but ill investigated speculation...
Bill O Reilly, somebody needs to kill this guy, and im serious. I will cut his balls off and shove them up his mouth, and then burn his whole body alive. I will kill everybody in the CIA and US Government, if i had the weapons and power. But we need to come together and kill them. Fuck martial law, and fuck New world order
liljuve13 2 months ago
Isn't it true that much of PM advertising revenue comes from US military and defense contractors? If you believe that is not a conflict of interests, you're a fool. Also, incriminating facts and data that are withheld in themselves create a lie, by omission.
millvalleyrn 5 months ago
Look at the other videos Popular Mechanics was in they did talk about the molten steel and building 7.....
batistaker123 6 months ago
if you were accused of firing a missile into the pentagon, and your defence was "no it was a plane, it melted on impact and disappeared" i think you would get fast tracked to the mental asylum.
1rowan2 9 months ago in playlist 9/11 Videos Disprove Consipracy
O'riley is an IDIOT...I have never seen such an ignorant person who wants WAR and never served but wants to send our kids to war because he is a propaganda pusher who brings on guys like pop mech Jim M who has degree in "Philosophy" and does not bring in Physicists...Duh wake up people it is the BIG LIE Hilter talked of
vincentmdowd 9 months ago
Comment removed
TheGBPM 10 months ago
Wash wash wash wash wash wash THAT BRAIN CLEAN WITH FLORIDE AND FOX NEWS Wash wash wash wash wash
daytripper170 10 months ago
lol
Conspiracy theorists are so stupid.
WVDave26 10 months ago
Bush is a liar, and Obama is in the loop or a coward......9/11 = Inside job
Born2Flesh 10 months ago
lololol brainwash at it's best
andyOsalek 1 year ago
@andyOsalek 15 of the 19 hi jackers were saudi nationals. atta was the leader. bin ladin claimed responsibility on that video where he looked pale and sickly looking. that video was translated by al-jeezra.
judgerofwars 8 months ago
lololol
andyOsalek 1 year ago
How could this be!!!??? There are actually people out there that believe otherwise than the almighty Bill O'Reilley?? Preposterous!! They must be pinheads because they don't think like Bill the patriot.
yojimbe1 1 year ago
Yes, the wings are not as substantial as the main part of the jet but the engines themselves weighed TONS... did they just disappear somehow against the "bunker-like" building? bullshit - they need to work on their story a little more.
BNotAffraid 1 year ago
building 7 what the hell never gets talked about
roccotaco10 1 year ago
guess what is a lot higher than 36% and also i really dislike both of these barf puddles.
DINGLEtheBERRY 1 year ago
dtroit2 how much do u get paid to spew shit
wild0hawk 1 year ago
james miegs'' the real suprise is that buildings stood up as long as they did'' wat a disgracefull lier, these motherfuckers need waterboarding done on them
wild0hawk 1 year ago
fire does not bring steel framed buildings down in their own foot prints, if fire were to do this it would have to remove each critical core column in a precisely timed manor. Fire can not do that, these buildings fell through the path of greatest resistance - period. Explain BBC & CNN reporting building 7 collapsing 15 minutes before it actually happened. Your being conditioned by controlled news to be an aid in tyranny, if you don't ask questions, your helping to destroy America.
KyleCom 1 year ago
@KyleCom Fires have brought down many steel framed buildings. The difference here is the fires were in 2 of the biggest buildings in the world. The fire was certainly hot enough to weaken the frame of the building beyond its ability to support itself. The collapse began when you saw the top start to tip, then the opposite side support columns snapped which were acting as the fulcrum of the rotation, thus the tipping stops and the downward fall begins resulting in a global collapse.
dtroit2 1 year ago
@dtroit2
Alright, well thanks for your calm reply despite my previous reply.
My problem is that these buildings clearly fell through the path of greatest resistance, it's just far too hard for a fire to make not one, but three buildings fall strait down into their own foot print, and these buildings did.
Check out Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth, Richard Gage has done a wonderful job putting this stuff together.
With false flags in history, who can blame people for being skeptical..
KyleCom 1 year ago
conspiracy theorists are fuking retarded and should be deported to bangladesh.. and bring fat ass michael moore with you!!
jutsin928 1 year ago
We're now in an era where "news" is more fictional than fiction itself. There are more actual true facts contained in the worst soap operas.
CodeTwo2 1 year ago
sorry but i find popular mechanics, with the actual research they do more believable than Jason & Dylans high school project known as Loose Change, which involves no research at all..
jutsin928 1 year ago
@jutsin928 9/11 was NOT an inside job. There are people that WITNESSED the plane hit the Pentagon. The WTC was not part of a control demolition because in a control demolition, the building would fall from the bottom up. In the WTC situation, the building fell from the TOP down basically where the impact of the plane occured and finally Building 7 was not a conventional skyscraper and had enormous trusses carrying high loads. The fires burned for a long time and ultimately the building collapsed
preving 1 year ago
@preving dude I know!, I think u misread my comments, cuz I'm on your side!!
I know what happened, I watched it LIVE on tv!.. lol, U thought I was one of those conspiracy theory nut jobs!!!
I know 9/11 wasn't an inside job, but some people (usually those with tinfoil headgear wrapped around their heads, cutting off rational thought) always have their BS theories and can't except facts.
Like people who say "We've never even landed on the moon maaan" Goddamn hippies!!
jutsin928 1 year ago
@jutsin928 I know you are on my side. I was just getting my points out....lol.
preving 1 year ago
"and the engineering community is unanimous that...."
WTF???!?!
guillermonomnom 1 year ago
9/11 was an inside job...
StopTheCorruption1 1 year ago
finally miggs says they wanted to establish the core facts
well why not just examine the facts why "establish"
I don't claim to know what happened.I ain't blaming anyone but this is clearly a shill report by fox and PM
gwizzle1 1 year ago
at 3:39 they show a photoshopped photo with the satanic head coming out of the clouds then oreilly says popular mechanics has been around forever.
why does he say forever as opposed to the truth.
this is a clever little game,much like a 3rd base coach giving the signals to his team
gwizzle1 1 year ago
oreilly plays a great mental game for those who are aware at 2:49
"so theres absolutely no evidence in both wtc or pentag. that anything happened that was stunning to the analysts who after the fact examined it,correct?
gwizzle1 1 year ago
1st myth
oreilly: buildings fell too fast.you say what? miggs :they didn't
noone had seen a building collapse so the idea they would tip over like a tree was based on a hunch
he didn't ask about peoples thoughts he asked about a fact and miggs didn't have a factual answer so it became a game of rhetoric as a way to answer
gwizzle1 1 year ago
interesting miggs claims aluminum wings shouldn't be able to pentetrate reinforced concrete
but they can penetrate steel
if he could only look objectively at his own argument
gwizzle1 1 year ago
anything can be done and said with the power of money. Everyone has a price and fox news is a huge example.
TheRevealingTruth 1 year ago
If you had asked me if I thought it was a conspiracy back in 2001-2003 I would have been one of the 64% - why would I have any doubt's as to what I see on the news.
After everything I have watched and read, and investigated myself, Popular Mechanics have not a scrap of scientific evidence in any of their videos or books. They try to cleverly avoid the facts.. "the plane was more like liquid than solid".. ahh, that's how the engines disappeared!!
madmonkeynat 1 year ago
If you had asked me if I thought it was a conspiracy back in 2001-2003 I would have been one of the 64% - why would I have any doubt's as to what I see on the news.
After everything I have watched and read, and investigated myself, Popular Mechanics have not a scrap of scientific evidence in any of their videos or books. They try to cleverly avoid the facts.. "the plane was more like liquid than solid".. ahh, that's how the engines disappeared!!
madmonkeynat 1 year ago
If one wants to learn about the character, credibility, and trustworthiness of James Meigs and Popular Mechanics, one can do no better than to use one's favorite web browser and search the following phrases:
popular mechanics' deceptive smear against 9/11 truth
kenp3L 2 years ago 4
America is a hen house.
Time to tell Rupert Murdoch to get the FOX out.
CaptJJYossarian 2 years ago 2
Also I like it how "unbiased" the "news" anchor is when askin gthe questions. Viewers of FOX, look at newschannels all around the world using internet and compare... might open your eyes. I have my hopes on internet....
InfomaniacJack 2 years ago
Populat Mechanics are soo full of it and I bet they know it... What I can't understand is not why those 36% are in doubt despite "news" stations like fox, but how anybody can believe in James here. i hope the expression "what goes around..." has any truth too it!
InfomaniacJack 2 years ago
I look at FOX news and what I see is germany in the late 30's... :( not referring to nazi's as such, but the propaganda machine. Scary scary stuff...
InfomaniacJack 2 years ago
Is this news?.... or an opnion show? damn puppets
InfomaniacJack 2 years ago
this isnt even a decent attempt at trying to lie to people
thornburn51 2 years ago 2
Traitors
Beacom1sm 2 years ago
That tool might want to go to A&E truth he just got debunked! 90 foot hole, yea right! the hole is not much bigger than the fire apparatus cell phones in 2001 didn't work at high altitudes that's why in 2003 the airlines put towers on the planes. Bill O'Reilly is a tool!
spikenation69 2 years ago
Inside job, wtc 7, controlled demolition, put options, nano thermite, free fall, , rebuilding americans defense, new pearl harber, larry silverstein pull it, (insurance), 9/11 comission, whistle blowers, witnesses, no black boxes but yes we,ve got the passport, patriot act, gaspipe, opium, nwo, cia o no bin ladin (familie) swine flow, media controlls-black out, end the list endless.
Wake up!! evidence everywere
sdjole 2 years ago
unanimous????
what about the enginners and architects for 911??
echofloripa 2 years ago
Wow, this meigs guy is something else, "the hole in the pentagon was 90 feet," flat out lie. Meigs says"the cell phones worked fine," thats not what he said in a debate with the loose change crew on democracy now. He said " we did'nt say the cell phones worked well but they did work." What a liar!!!!!!!!
doire7 2 years ago
lol, james is more of a COMEDIAN than anything else..
faheemthedream2007 2 years ago
Notice how he didn't examine the government's ethical practices before and after 9/11. Any true scientist wont put a sticker price on true knowledge. Look at how much you can learn about evolution for free versus the U.S. history's most debated event. I want to see the how many engineers support his theory, its not fact if there is not any OTHER editor besides his self, sources for other proven novels, and skeptics form every realm.
surname07 2 years ago
HAHAHAHAHA
They didn't even talk about anything significant!
How about Building 7? How about the Molten Steel? WTF?!
MooMoomans 2 years ago 11
yeah, these guys are bullshit...
Queitaro 2 years ago
@MooMoomans What about it? There was NO molten steel lol. Get your facts straight before you regurgitate garbage and make yourself look foolish.
dtroit2 1 year ago
@dtroit2
Actually NASA satellite photos prove molten steel existed, FEMA also documented molten steel and countless first responders speak of it as well. You also have the world trade center rock made up of molten steel and even video and photo evidence.
Go ahead and be a sheep, contribute to tyranny and help American's live in tyranny, your doing a fine job you disgrace to humanity.
KyleCom 1 year ago
@KyleCom Your sources are mis leading you. Nasa photos cant show you molten "steel". They can show you how hot the area is though.
People like you say molten steel and what you mean is molten metal which is a huge difference. There was plenty of molten metal at the site consisting of aluminum and various alloys of aluminum. No steel however until the clean up effort began.
The people who fling the word "sheep" around always seem to be the least educated on here.
dtroit2 1 year ago
@dtroit2
And to people like you. I say, enjoy the patriot act that you help to support!
I'm not even American and I care more about your constitution then you do, your rights are being taken away because of a false flag, and you think that things are fine and dandy because your television told you so.
Go watch some more BBC & CNN, the other sheep are waiting.
KyleCom 1 year ago
@KyleCom just because I dont believe there were missiles and phantom planes doesnt mean i love the patriot act. In fact the patriot act is one of the worst things thats happened to this country in a long time.
But to say that there were no planes, that no debris was found at the pentagon, that explosives were used at WTC is just ignorant to anyone with the least amount of healthy skepticism.
dtroit2 1 year ago
@MooMoomans building 7 fell because the twin towers collapsed on top of them, plus it caught fire.
judgerofwars 8 months ago
@judgerofwars u have been succesfully brainwashed
omeEd1973 7 months ago
@judgerofwars "the twin towers collapsed on top of them" ... OK well that has been proven false. Apparently you like to create your own version of reality.
millvalleyrn 5 months ago
wow this whole show is giving a rundown of false events to the viewers like they were kindergarden students.
shoesalesmanBundy 2 years ago
the engineering guys dont agree with popular mechanics and this jew.
shoesalesmanBundy 2 years ago
he said it perfect "The gov wants the war on terror"
twelvefifty 2 years ago
I hate this guy! Hes says a plane wont leave a "cartoon cut out" in the pentagon, which is only concrete, but some how it left one in the WTC...also I think four eyes should look at scientific proof himself. Jet fuel wont melt steel...I think hes the one who opposes the proof.
olshwa 2 years ago
man these guys are professional liars fa real
haha...they didn't explain shit !!!
what a bunch of horse shit
bill o'rielly should go to jail for lying to the american people
RNBJ22 2 years ago
that's what I was thinkin'...
Queitaro 2 years ago
these two dorky fuckers dont explain
enough,
its all about money
pauliewaulieflimflam 2 years ago
Popular Mechanics are owned by "Hearst Publishing" who are owned by "General Electric" who also own "NBC" and "Lockhead-Martin" who have some very profitable weapons contracts in the these wars. They also own "A & E" and the "History Channel"
Lynn Cheney works for "Lockhead-Martin" and she is married to the forner Vice President (Dick Cheney) who formerly worked for "Halliburton" who also have some very profitable contracts in these wars.
No conflicts of interest there, none at all...
TheDocumentaryZone 3 years ago 2
not one intelligent explanation was given in this vid
n3nshat1 3 years ago
Wow. Such a great explanation. We should believe this guy.
aikido7 3 years ago
I hope that was sarcasm. But I doubt it.
...
FUCK FAUX NEWS
!!!
TempestDust 3 years ago
Sarcasm? All you have to do is ASK.
BTW, it's common knowledge that burning jet fuel turns steel and concrete to powder. Even Bush knows THAT.
aikido7 3 years ago
Ok, lol. I feel ya.
TempestDust 3 years ago
lol, who calls their family members, and says "Hi, This is so and so", using their first and last name?
James Meigs take your Pop. Mech. book, and shove it so far up your ass, b/c you are full of more shit, than a waste dump.
Airportchris2 3 years ago
Actually its more than 36% now, Mr. O'Riley.
Airportchris2 3 years ago
No its these news people, and the Popular Mechanics people the "explain it in a fancy way" to make it sound more true, but its the lie, 9/11 Inside Job!!!
Airportchris2 3 years ago
This isn't BULL-SHIT....this is BiLL-SHIT, hahah...9-11-01 was an inside job!!! I'll sing it to the day I die !!! Fuck the corporate mass media and their spin doctor bullshit! The evidence is there, because the mass media says otherwise, most dumb asses that can't think for themselves scratch their head and think "well the news on tv says 9-11-01 was not an inside job" - so I'll just go back to sleep. WAKE UP, Obama ain't gonna change shit, he will be just like Bush. we need revolution!
undergroundbasement 3 years ago 2
Luckily nobody listens to you people. And even those convinced are just being misled, and are not automatically crazy.
Superphilipp 3 years ago
Nobody listens to us people? what about your own Andreas von Bülow , having served 20+ years as an SPD member of German Parliament? I guess he's misled too, it doesn't matter how many facts that are put up, the mass denial is just too fuckin thick to cut through.
undergroundbasement 3 years ago
And it's a good thing too.
Superphilipp 3 years ago
This is crap ... for one thing when asked about the speed of fall he didn't actually debunk the speed of fall ... he just said it wouldn't topple over, there was no mention of the explosive nature of the collapses or building 7 or the cover up of evidence or anything like that... and of course, like most debunkers they associate us with the no planers ... and the most interesting thing about the pentagon isn't the size of the hole, its the fact they're withholding 84 fucking videos!
ScootleRoyale 3 years ago
Mainstream news and its followers are complete Fu*kin morons
dcsk8dc 3 years ago
--2:45--"...the plain really flowed into that building, more like a liquid than a solid..."
If the walls were reinforced, how did the aircraft flowed into?
Guys, cut the fu***ng crap.
MeatVision 3 years ago
Sorry, i meant plane.
MeatVision 3 years ago
Bill O'Reilly very GULLIBLE, very BLIND, or part of the deception since he is with the big brother controlled media.
It's kind of ridiculous for him to think that we should accept his word just because he's Billy-O the news guy. How much intelligence does it take to read a cue card?
Did anyone else notice that the popular mechanics guy did nothing but offer his opinion without any PROOF to back it up?
Everything he said was CONJECTURE and SPECULATION. NO FACTS!
64689905 3 years ago
It's only a one hour show. It would take alot longer to explain even one aspect of 9/11.
AmericasFan 3 years ago
GOD I Hate conspiracy theorist!!
SkyFox98 3 years ago
You'll probably be first to drink the purple koolaid.
64689905 3 years ago
This person named 'popular mechanics' is only popular, but not inteligent. He hasn't any contrargument to 'conspiracy'. There are a lot of evidences of controlled demolitions. There is a lot of questions didn't answer by goverment, why?
Marech1984 3 years ago
PM made fools of themselves. If it wasn't 4 the fact that I personally saw videos of demolition n structural physics experts from outside the U.S. say the WTC especially building 7 couldn't possibly be anything other than controlled demolition with thermite charges then I would of believed the bullshit the PM guy is spewing in this video. He just bold face lies about no experts contradicting the official 9/11 documentation when there are tons of experts right here on youtube saying the opposite.
shaheed79 3 years ago 2
Ha ha people don't want to believe there are evil people in the world cut to the devils face in the smoke at 3.38 Attempted Mind control. I agree with person bellow you can use hypnotic inflection in your speech which is a tactic salesmen often use. It is rhythmical speaking which is hypnotic and kind of calming for the sheeple.
J4JB 3 years ago
I watched a guy do a test with cell phones on airplane. At 6000ft. all 3 brands he tested from 3 top cell co. all had no signal! this guy is a bold face lier!and i heard no scientific eviedence to prove nothing. all he does is talk out his ass, like us folks are stupid.sorry im not convinced 19 arabs with box cutters did all this damage, and out foxed USA air defence systems.
tone4624 3 years ago
wow, he said the pentagon hole was 30 ft wide.....wow
how bout after the missile hit?
mpalkstuff529 3 years ago
this is the biggest piece of weaksauce i've ever seen
mpalkstuff529 3 years ago
I had a friend who studied hypnotism. He spoke with much the same tones and inflections as these two when he would try to control.
Things like "It is only right that I sleep with your 16 year old girlfriend." "It is wrong of you to think that I shouldnt have sex with you 16 year old girlfiend" "How could you live with yourself with the knowledge that you denied me the right to have sex daily with your 16 year old girlfriend"
Who are you to have such thoughts of 911.
groggoulp 3 years ago
yea man, add that to tv's mind control capabilities....and so long critical thinking
mpalkstuff529 3 years ago 2
James Meigs sounds like his heart is going to jump out of his mouth!
Why so nervous Mr. Meigs ?
pumaman1 3 years ago
Popular Mechanics themselves got debunked and were proven to be major liars.
cjstudent83 3 years ago 9
I agree, a lot of their information can be debunked thoroughly by scholars of the 9/11 Truth Movement, in particular David Ray Griffin, who has published a book entitled "Debunking 9/11 Debunking" where he debunks the debunkers on the 9/11 conspiracy and his chapter on Popular Mechanics has alone 100 pages of debunking information. I highly recommend this book.
eclipsesonic 3 years ago 2
@cjstudent83 no, you're just a dumbass.
NefariousBanana 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@cjstudent83 only in your mind
judgerofwars 8 months ago
Propaganda machine in full flow! Did anyone read George Orwell's 1984 by any chance?
dizzib 4 years ago
he keep contridicin him self they went into wtc,they were heavy dence plANES,then the pent,they were soft alum tubes,how does that make any sence,pop mech,govt owned,and paid for!
tone4624 4 years ago
hahaha meigs makes me sick in the stomach. he is sitting there trembling like a schoolboy bitch as he dribbles out the brainwashing pre-prepared crap. they avoid every single issue
tommybongersmah 4 years ago 4
steel fall in piece after fire... Plane turn into liquid after hiting building... fact are fact they are political cuz they are not doing what people think but just white wash for this mathers.
FreemanOwnage 4 years ago
whAT A CROCK OF BULLSHIT , FUCKING ROBOTS!
eyesbehinddarkness 4 years ago 2
"On the internet it started right?" - Thats right billo, attack the internet. Imagine if the internet was stripped of free speech and then the Patriot Act was broadened to encompass the web. Scary man, just scary.
positived 4 years ago
The plane wasnt strong enough to penetrate the pentagon but it left that big hole on the other side. I wonder why they never show those pics.
0sammaB 4 years ago
When someone right of the bat comes out calling you names like "nutty" "stupid" "garbage" and doesn't address the issue at hand you tend to wonder why he avoids the real thing
0sammaB 4 years ago 2
such a liar, my goodnes, i can´t beleive what u think, the people it´s stupid, ha ha ha
j4tboo 4 years ago 2
Cell phones "Work fine" in aeroplanes? Absolute total lie. These guys claim to speak to experts in the backroom and then come out and just make shit up. That guy Meigs will be tried and executed for treason one day. Mark my word.
Focoist911 4 years ago 4
"This is the most closely studied collapse in history" - only a true statement because of the 9/11 Truth Movement. NIST just finally admitted that they can't explain how the towers came down so quickly and never tried to model it. This guy is a Zionist jew liar. "1000s of engineers"??? What a fucking lie. You won't find 10 who support the official story.
Focoist911 4 years ago
look who hes tellin this shit to,Bill that guy fights all his guest,but to this asshole hes actin like hes speakin the gospel.Unbelvable,we need a team of experts with NO govt,or finical ties to govt or corp. involded to do a REAl studie of 9/11!!
tone4624 4 years ago
welcome to nazi america!! it will take another 50years for americans to realise the governments are full of dictators. watch '9/11 mysteries'
AMERSIDD 4 years ago
And this statement of urs:
"The reason that 10% was enough to bring down the Towers, was a little think called 'gravity' maybe you've heard of it"
...maybe somebody ought to call the Nobel Prize Commitee. Because that would've been quite a discovery, that gravity can do this.
Use ur brain man, spontaneous gravity doesn't do stuff like this, u already know that, come on!
Sandberg1972 4 years ago
Ur focusing on the wrong items Soda, u shouldn't focus on whether YOU think it's possible or not to rig those towers and 7, but rather on if u think that 3 of those buildings can collapse like that through some fire and partial asymmetrical damage.
All these specific characteristics are very well explainable with a CD-hypothesis. Not really (or should I say very badly) with a gravity-hypothesis.
Sandberg1972 4 years ago
That's right. U don't understand me, it seems.
Just shows to me how foolish u are, and how far away from reality u are.
U choose to live in a fantasyworld, where govt. and big corporations tell the truth, and large steel structures totally destruct themselves with the greatest of ease.
Good luck with that! Cheers!
Sandberg1972 4 years ago
Never mind sodapop, u're obviously lost. No clue about impulse or resistance whatsoever.
Sandberg1972 4 years ago
Who's talking about impulse and resistance? I think your the one that's lost, your comments don't even make any sense. How am I suppossed 2 show you how insane you are if I can't understand you?
sodapopp311 4 years ago
Well sodapop,
It's a little hard, or actually VERY hard, for all those tons of metal & concrete to collapse so fast when it's being met by an even far GREATER AMOUNT of steel & concrete.
So, the only conspiracy I see is the one that's claiming that all of this intact structure should provide hardly ANY resistance whatsoever.
In fact, that's pretty ludicrous.
Sandberg1972 4 years ago
Whatever dude, I'm not stubborn enough 2 think I can change your mind! Those two buildings took a hit from twin supersonic incendiary bombs and they stood for more than an hour. That might not seem that much, but it is when you have a major conflagration of fire going on inside them. What do you think happened, that some group planted demo 2 bring them down. Maybe if they started wiring 4 months prior to 9/11
sodapopp311 4 years ago
AND TO TOP IT ALL OFF he cites opinions of engineers, BIZARRELY stating that, "The real surprise is that the building stood up as long as it did."
To say this schmuck from Pop Mechanics brings science and facts and NO POLITICAL AFFILIATION is ABSOLUTELY LAUGHABLE!!!
yayarea41507 4 years ago
Meigs concurs that it's an unprecedented event and yet claims that analysts knew exactly what was going to happen. How could they have known the ins and outs of an event that had never happened before?
Meigs calls the WTC implosion, "The most closely studied collapse in world history," yet fails to address the fact that 50,000 tons of steel from the WTC, a supposed crime scene, was shipped to Asia and a further 10,000 tons to India, preventing a detailed analysis.
yayarea41507 4 years ago
Meigs contradicts himself completely in claiming that, "No one had ever seen a one hundred plus story building collapse to the ground before," and yet less than two minutes later agrees with O'Reilly's comment that nothing unexpected about the impact of the planes or the collapses surprised analysts
yayarea41507 4 years ago
"nutty conspiracy garbage"
"paranoia"
"i didn't see it" (what bias from an ass clown in o'reilly)
this "expert" gives no scientific evidence for why they fell. he's basing his shit off of HUNCHES.
if the wings fell off at the pentagon, why didn't the wings fall off from the planes that went into the twin towers?
yayarea41507 4 years ago
ATT-JAMES MEIGS please please please do us all & urself a favour & hang ur self u lyin bastard. ps nice balled spot
hatchlingfrog 4 years ago
Ok, so u're an engineering student, that's great!
Tell me, what do u know about conservation of momentum & angular momentum? What do u know about the transfer of energies when 2 objects collide?
If u've done ur homework, u should be able to spot the inconsistencies and false assumptions (made by Bazant) of the official explanation quite easily.
I'm an economics graduate, and even I can spot them with ease.
Sandberg1972 4 years ago
Its funny that nobody has brought up what you just said. Why is it so hard for people to understand that when tons of metal and concrete start to collapse, there is nothing anyone an do! I should know, I did my english research paper on all those nutty conspiracies.
sodapopp311 4 years ago
I like the way this popular mech clown avoid to answer the question of the collaps speed... Yep, 10 seconds, whatever they say, Newton says : controled demolition. Those people are pathetic, they only debunk themselves... And John O'Nazi can go fuck himself !
onegus 4 years ago
Sophitablue, lemme ask you:
Do you have a working brain?
A working bullshitdetector maybe, to determine which "facts" possibly contain truth or are true, and which declared "facts" are obviously lies?
Do you have the ability to recognize a lie when it's being told to you?
I'm asking you this, because u don't seem to possess ANY of the above.
I suggest you stop posting for a while, and do some research first, using ur godgiven ability to THINK FOR YOURSELF.
Sandberg1972 4 years ago
I am thinking for myself. I am an engineering student, and even though I haven't graduated yet, I can answer a lot of the questions people raise about the attacks. You know, with science and facts. I have done research, only my research goes beyond "Loose Change" and crappy websites that cite the first few days after the attack. Just look in ANY Strength of Materials book and you'll find answers to the stupid "but steel melts at..." bullshit.
sophitablue 4 years ago
They say that they're debunking the "conspiracy theorists" using scientific evidence? Uncited and not even referred to in their arguments? And implying that said theorists aren't also using scientific evidence? Throw in the insulting and derogatory terms they're using and you've got yourself one wagonful of pure bullshit that, frankly, is growing stale.
WraithGod 4 years ago
You all are tools. You keep claiming that you're not going to believe what "they" are telling you. But you'll listen to fucking 20-somethings with access to the internet that post some video or website crying "conspiracy!" Yeah, go on believing you're a free-thinker because you subscribe to someone's fucked-up version of 9/11.
sophitablue 4 years ago
So. Do you seriously think that hole in the Pentagon is 90 freaking feet wide? You've got to be kidding me.
WraithGod 4 years ago
F.Y.I. the hole was 35m wide not 90 feet, where did you even hear that? I just finished a research paper on these stupid myths, I did plenty of research--ON BOTH SIDES!! just so you know I'm not completely biased. Do me a favor and do some legitimate research before you start spreading lies & half-truths about stuff you obviously know nothing about. The plane that hit the Pentagon, was traveling at over 240m per second. Your Welcome
sodapopp311 4 years ago
holy crap do they think we are that stupid? I refuse to believe that the american people could be that stupid. There wasn't a single shred of evidence shown. They just kept saying, take are word for it scienctist have proven it. And guess what kiddies they did it with only a small fraction of the evidence.
WPharolin 4 years ago
look at his insane grin. he´s a bad liar.
xaninha123 4 years ago 3
Notice that at 3:11 Bill O'Reilly lies and says he saw tv coverage of TWA800 crash and that he didn't see any missiles. Funny thing, the only video that caputured the TWA 800 incident was a video made at a wedding reception. That video was seized by the FBI, never shown on tv and the owners never received a copy back from the FBI. Because there was "no" video, the CIA created a $12 million animated recreation of what happened. Google (James Sanders TWA 800)
moichidomoichido 4 years ago 2
Davin Coburn gets his ass handed to him by charles goyette. Makes statements that he just can't back up, admits that the evidence that PM saw is not "public" it's a "secret" and we have to take their word for it. Why the sources in their book so messed up?
moichidomoichido 4 years ago
HEY Davin your a fudge packer ... (Sorry for the insult)
I just use this to describe how he wastes his life defending the Government reports.
uses his facts and A + B + C = whatever the government said.
macMajorD 4 years ago
then where the fuck are the wings? and how does damage to 10 percent of the towers weaken it enough to bring it down
dwalto1 4 years ago
The plane was traveling at over 240m per second that hit the Pentagon, I am pretty confident they snapped off on impact. You actually think they would stay on going that fast. The reason that 10% was enough to bring down the Towers, was a little think called 'gravity' maybe you've heard of it! Plus, there were some pretty intense flames as well!!
sodapopp311 4 years ago
LIAR LIAR LAIR
the hole in the pentagon was TWENTY FEET WIDE before the face collapsed.
a plane can NOT fit into a 20 foot wide hole.
NoahHoe 4 years ago
fuckin A
hatchlingfrog 4 years ago
You can take authority over common sense as long as you want, but dont talk down to other people, you sheep.
If you have any faith in the Popular Mechanics people, then i demand you to watch this video of a radio show interviewing Davin Coburn the researcher for Popular Mechanics. and watch both parts.
/watch?v=XLx5GATh_z0&mode=related&search=
if you still think they do serious research, you´re either Delusional or a Fony.
xaninha123 4 years ago 2
O'Reilly lies at 3:11. Says he saw TWA 800 crash. There was and is no video of this incident. Somebody tell Bill to turn off his vibrator and keep his lies straight.
moichidomoichido 4 years ago
these bastards are scientists now!!fox and the media is like a fucking jew wedding - of course they gona lie and lie and ask yourself WHAT the fuck is the world coming to? why are these cunts loving the war games, its not even funny, its a disgrace. the rise of hitler and most dont have a clue!!
AMERSIDD 4 years ago
Your ignorance astounds me, "The media is like a f***ing jew weding" Do you even know that your a bigot? WOW!!
sodapopp311 4 years ago
i was the 2nd gunman on the grassy noll.
lt12ws 4 years ago
actually, they used 4 gunmen, and i have the only video proving it, given to me by my father, so thats not funny
dwalto1 4 years ago
fuck fox news... bill oreilly is a pathetic, radical neo-con cock sucker. i dont give a shit about his ratings, that doesnt mean shit when your journalism is inaccurately portrayed.
lebroniznumba1 4 years ago 2
Can see the stretch marks on his cheeks from sucking too much Government cock!
Wyndup 4 years ago 2
lol
lebroniznumba1 4 years ago
'36%!!!...Jeez, ive gotta do something about this, people are starting to think for themselves!!!'
Bring on all the shills and lets have a little shill debate on FOX NEWS!!! What a load of Government propoganda bullshit!!! Fucking cunts.
Wyndup 4 years ago
BS CAN YOU SAY BS WHAT A DUMBASS DUDE
SkyDimples 4 years ago
America can film people walking in and out of a factory in Iraq using satelites ..we all saw it on TV when we were told it was a potential chemical warfare production unit.. It turned out to be an asprin factory). BUT the USA can not film a plane smashing into the Pentagon "the film is there it just isnt very good" someone says earlier. If I tried to enter the Pentagon I would be on over a dozen cameras.
WAKE UP
beeaj 4 years ago
The thing is idiots like Bill Oriely are suppose to be asking and getting the answer to questions like these and others but instead they just go with the flow. They are suppose to work for the people not the government, yet who do they work for the Neo-cons and Corporations which is by definition Fascism
Chibangs 4 years ago
Unfortunately the flow is incontravertable truth...
jav8or 4 years ago
This dude is the worst he is a horrible lier at best and Oriely sucks cocks for a living! This guy says..I list the facts." He didn't list ONE fact. Didn't mention one degree of melting points or even go near building 7. His fact sheet keeped refering to cartoons then the jump to TWA flight. Not ONE fact was listed in this interview. I guess that proves everthing
Chibangs 4 years ago
O'Reilly is a sheep. Guess he didn't see Building 7 collapse. It had two small fires on two floors. It looked exactly like a controlled demolition as it fell. In the 9/11 report, there was no mention of Building 7 collapsing. That's quite an oversite. Wake up people, think for yourself!!
monster289 4 years ago
yeah, and there were obviously explosives in that building. what were explosives doing in that building??
synthesized972 4 years ago
I used to have respect for Bill Oreily but I see he has also BEEN BOUGHT OFF to push the lies, look at videos of what plane crashes realy look like the debris left behind, the skid marks they leave on the ground none of what can be found at the pentagon WAKE THE FUKC UP AMERICA
jrngln 4 years ago
dude usually when planes crash, the people inside are trying to land them as safely as they can. have you ever seen a multiton aircraft crash into anything at 500kts? Come on ......!
jav8or 4 years ago
Have you?
Chibangs 4 years ago
are you saying that the attacks were staged? are you saying calls made to faimlies from the planes were staged? are you saying that Osama bin laden admission, a man we cant find, was staged?
What proof are you looking for? Secret Documents linking Bush and Fox news to 9/11?
Where are the Conspiracy Theories linking Pres. Clinton to the Trade Center Bombings, oh right, there arent any
jav8or 4 years ago
Type in "Seven Unanswered Questions About 9/11, Part 2 of 2" right here on Youtube and see for yourself. It's not me saying the calls can't be made. The Facts are saying it Jav8or
Chibangs 4 years ago
i'll take on one of the "facts" from that clip: Voice synthesizers. in order for "the Big Bad Government" to fake all the calls wouldnt they first have to have all of the voices of people that made calls that day. The Big Bad Government would have to have known months in advance of all the people who would have been on those flights. This in itself strains credibility.
What that video presented wasnt facts but ill investigated speculation...
jav8or 4 years ago