Did U see the 7 point Satan star on the cops. The 7 pointed star is a highly Satanic symbol, it is 2 points higher the pentagram. The star/shield of King Daved has 6 points and should B used instead. I would not trust a cop with a 7 point star coz they work/belong 2 Satan weather they know it or not.
@Anaki99DK You can film me all you want. I know its legal for you to do it, so there is nothing I can or will do to make you stop. Is it a little weird what he is doing? maybe. But certainly legal. When your in public, you can be recorded. Even the police have audio and sometimes video recordings to help themselves.
if user deletes comments, i will remake a duplicate video, and redistribute to stand up for law enforcement, video is ambush journalism, and never let officer have his right not to be filmed, if you like cameras go to England, and they will watch all citizens like a hawk, so dont put a camera in someones face. a free country is people not filming a person every where he goes.
guy filming only because he got in trouble for drunk driving, and now wants revenge by trying to get police to use brutality, he needs a hair cut, shower and a little respect for officer doing his job. its interfearing with an investigation, and offcers need safety distance from people, so they dont have to watch other people. guy filming police should have been patted down for drugs, he probably has some weed or he is definatly a crack head of some kind trying to attack the innocent officer.
When are you guys going to start repelling the laws that were recently enacted to protect Public Officials illegal acts. Not that most Cops are bad because most aren't but we are seeing a shift in the debased morals of Men being employed and given authority when they are dangerous enough without it.
These are only city cops. Wait until the army starts enforcing the NDAA.
Support Ron Paul because he's the only candidate who'll repeal that crap. Obama lied, he said he wouldn't sign it, but he did. He now has the same powers as Stalin to fill the gulags with his political enemies.
read all the other posts, 1st it is not against the Law to film, 2nd there is no distance thing, 3rd they testified to less then ten feet buy all evidence physical evidence shows me more then 25 feet away, 4th that Deputy has been hit with Lawsuits over my videos, it is Deputies like this ass that give all cops a bad name. He is a Corrupt Cop and even the Sheriff's Dets. say so
@chad24ist there use to be a time in this country were we said what do you think this is RUSSIA ? Now Russia has more freedoms then us. In San Diego there is no 1st, 2nd, 4th, or 14th Amendments
Pinghead are you really that stupid, you have to be if you posted that, if you look at earlier videos you will see a month earlier this same cop beat up a 16 year old kid for no reason, and the county is making him the bad guy trying to defend the rest in the Federal Civil Rights violations, which is what is going on here, and he has yet another suit or two coming, the same Deputy who is being accused of a home Invasion, by a local Attorney. Know some history and Law before you post stupid shit
@NewsNowSanDiego I didn't know that so don't be so rude and call someone stupid jerk. You could have stated that simple fact. It still doesn't change what I said, He wan't filming from a distance he was walking up to the cop and filming just feet away. Again you don't have to be rude and it doesn't help your case by belittling people.
This guy could have filmed this from the side walk. If you noticed the guy was in the middle of car traffic, that is the officers concern, as well as the privacy of the person dealing with the arrest. This guy had every right to film this situation but didn't have the right to get inside the officers space. It is not illegal to post stuff like this on you tube or you tube wouldn't exist. Also the news would have to get everyone's permission to post there stuff.
He wan't really arrested for filming he was arrested for impeding an officer in his duties, When the officer said it was too close he should have backed off. The officer didn't have a problem with him filming he even said go over by the carts. This guy was walking up to the situation the cops were dealing with. Cops don't like it when people they don't know walk up to them when they are performing their duties. It is not illegal to post pics or video of people on the internet.
bro take that flip camera and stick it up your ass. get a real job. i think you wanted to be a cop but your too crazy to pass the psych evaluation. LOSER! if you were a real reporter you would work for a real news station and not have yellow pages numbers in your phone.
NewsNowSanDiego, it look slike you are on PRIVATE PROPERTY, now, doesn't it? That would make the constitutionally protected right to film or photograph in PUBLIC not applicable th your filming on this video. You must be on public property to enact this right. I'm all for the right to film, but you are clearly being a complete jerk, filming for no reason just to get a rise out of and bother these cops. You are a first class bad example to those who are truly protecting constitutional freedom.
Even the lady getting arrested wanted to kick your ass, she has a right to privacy, you are violating it by taping and recording them calling in her personal information. If the Media has to compy with privacy law, so do you.
This is America... Land of the free, home of the dumbass. Besides Mental Illness, why would you harass cops? As someone arrested, but not convicted, you are interfering with my right to due process, posting video of me being arrested online is violating MY FUCKING RIGHTS as an American you shithead, how about I sue your stupid hippie ass? Let me guess, you are a Tea Party punk faggot too, that believes in law and order right? Otherwise spelled: H Y P O C R I T E
This cameraman is an idiot. He was interfering with a police investigation. The officers have a right to officer safety while conducting an investigation. They did not arrest you for filming but for getting to close and was interfering. They clearly said step back .They did not say stop filming you idiot.
@greenmachine911 I do not see anything in this video that supports your claim of the citizen interfering with an investigation. Are you willing to point it out please?.... Darn, I missed it again! So do you believe that standing roughly a car's length or so from police while they are doing an investigation is an arrestable offense? The guy did not threaten the police or show any sign of being a potential danger to them. Maybe they felt threatened by what was on the video recording!? bully scum!
@anainutta You stand behind an officer it is very concerning when you need to have your attention drawn to the person you are talking to. He was TOO close. If the officers were concerned about the video they would not have asked him step further back. They would have said stop taping. The one piece of fact I must share is the video taper has a history of assaults on peace officers and interfering in investigations. Try looking up 148 (a)(1) pc of the California penal code.
@helobelow Actually, you can video tape someone in public. But you couldn't post it anywhere in public - or anywhere for the entire "world to see" - without that person's consent because that would be using their likeness without their permission.
@Pafoofnik1 Lol it's a real law... That person can file a civil suit against you and the host of the domain for the website. It's perfectly legal to record ANYTHING in public, even fights etc (though it may be confiscated as evidence), you just don't have the rights to upload or display them without consent. Whether the person finds it online and prosecutes you is another matter entirely, so most people get away with it. This guy, however, also followed the officers (harassment)
@Pafoofnik1 Fair enough: wings(dot)buffalo(dot)edu/law/bclc/web/NewYork/ny3%28b%29.htm -- 240.26(b), Harassment 2nd degree, following in a public place etc, also could be the 1st degree. Obstructing police during an investigation. If he'd been convicted of 240.26 within ten years it becomes aggravated Harassment 1st, a Class A misdemeanor, rather than a class B. There's PLENTY those cops could have nailed him on, all he had to do was comply and not be a dick.
@steveecker; I asked you for the law behind your comment that "you can video tape someone in public. But you couldn't post it anywhere in public - or anywhere for the entire "world to see" - without that person's consent"
This law you present here is about something completely different.
@Pafoofnik1 No it's not lol. The violation here is posting it to a public access channel (the internet) without consent, the footage obtained was done so during a crime (harassment 2nd), making it confiscateable. You are NOT allowed to POST video footage of someone without consent, you're only allowed to record it. They can bring a civil suit (as many have) as well as the above mentioned criminal charges. Call a lawyer, ask for yourself. That person's likeness is what makes it so.
@Pafoofnik1 And I gave you a VERY SPECIFIC law regarding this incident. It is harassment 2nd degree, as well as obstruction of justice as the officers were issuing a citation. He interfered with the investigation and followed them repeatedly. Posting it online without consent is grounds for a civil suit, because their likenesses become "intellectual property" and thus, it's illegal. I don't know how much more clearly you want me to explain this to you, it's pretty simple.
@steveecker said: "And I gave you a VERY SPECIFIC law regarding this incident."
Your very specific law doesn't say a thing about your guess that "you can video tape someone in public. But you couldn't post it anywhere in public - or anywhere for the entire "world to see" - without that person's consent"
which is what I asked you to prove.
"I don't know how much more clearly you want me to explain this to you,"
I don't want your explanation. I want to see this law you say exists.
@steveecker Shut up asshole. He was standing still, a good distance away. He said nothing and obstructed nothing and posting it is completely legal you idiot
@amaturemusicians Hey genius, how EXACTLY can you follow police officers around if you're standing still? He was too close, and was asked repeatedly to NOT follow them. He impeded an investigation by distracting the officers from their task (otherwise known as obstruction). You're obviously not educated and just looking to fight, grow up. You call me an idiot yet I've cited specific laws that he's broken, and it's clear in this video. Go try it to your local officer...
@steveecker Shut up cunt. He didn't impede anything and if those officers can't concentrate on what they're doing....those are over paid security guards you pussy
@amaturemusicians Lol seriously bud? How mature/old are you? You have NOTHING better to do with your life than pick fights on youtube because you have daddy issues? Grow up, bye bye... This is called being mature, watch and learn.. Then click the delete button.
@amaturemusicians As for you not being able to READ what I wrote, when you do something in public, that makes it public. Therefore nulling your right to privacy. Your LIKENESS becomes intellectual property of yourself and though everyone is free to record in a public place, they need YOUR PERMISSION to upload it to public access channels (eg the internet). Perhaps you should crack a law book open from time to time, or maybe even google. You stink of troll.... Grow up.
@mattyice661 I don't believe this is true. If they are out in public then they are fair game. If you notice on Youtube there is no consent for any of the videos and they contain a lot of pics of Kids.
@pinghead105 I believe they are "fair game" to record, but I don't think it's beyond the realm of possibility to prosecute them in court for posting the video and using your likeness.
people like this are the reason they don't want people filming them, the camera guy ran up on the cop, he is lucky he didn't get hurt, I'm all for filming these thugs but do it the right way...
Is this camera man for real? What a dick head. A person with a camera could cause a riot puting the arrested person at risk and especially the police officer at risk. This 1st amendment is one thing, abusing it is another. Take your camera and shove it up your ass spinning.
What is the point of even filming? Just trying to stir up controversy. People like you make me sick. Get a life, you pathetic loser. And by the way, being that close to a police investigation is considered interfering.
"If we don't exercise our rights, we will lose them." -David Sohappy-
Transparency in government includes filming police on duty. The man looked to be about 15 feet or more away. Imagine the outcome of the Rodney King beating trial without the video.
You scream about them "violating" his rights. They told him where to go stand if he wanted to stay out of trouble. When he told the cops THEY should concentrate on their stuff, he was almost clipped by a car. He was obstructing traffic which alone is against the law. Beyond that, what about the woman's right to privacy the camera man violated. You could here on the recording that she didn't want her picture taken or any video filmed? They put her in the car because she was about to go after him.
@zentner18 No the supreme court ruled that was not what the wire tapping law was designed to prevent and public officials in public places providing a public service may be recorded by private citizens.
@helobelow Public officials, but what about the woman they were talking too? She was not a public official and his video recording of what she was saying goes against her rights.
No it doesn't. Learn where the legal boundaries are. She had no expectation of privacy in that public setting. The law doesn't make police officers 2nd class citizens. They have the same rights we all have--e.g. they can film too.
@helobelow I'll also add this. If the woman would have stated that she wanted this person to film what was going on, there would be no problem. But when she made clear, from which you can tell by her speaking, that she didn't want to be recorded, he then violated her rights to privacy.
That's simply incorrect. You have no more right to privacy in a public venue than the police. Police routinely film using dashboard cameras without seeking consent.
@zentner18 Wrong silly rabbit. I can even video tape an imbecile like you if you are in pubic no matter what. Then I could post it next to the monkey house at the zoo for every one in the world to see the comparison and similarities. Im so sick of all the stupid Monday morning quarterbacks that dont know their ass from a whole in the ground! Your in public, you can be filmed, check the supreme court rulings dummy!
Care to cite some recent case law? I believe you're incorrect. It's not the mode of recording, it's whether there's an expectation of privacy. Typically, in a public setting, there is not.
@pinballwyz Common law generally holds that if in a public place, you can record anything you see, except you can't harass, not highly intrusive or overzealous. Galella v. Onassis (2nd Cir. 1973): First Amendment doesn't give right to harass.
Can't use electronic or photographic equipuipment to enhance vision (can't use telephoto lens to see what can't see without it).
You can eavesdrop in a public place; up to people in conversation to make private
Not if it's open/available to the general public...unless the owner arrived and requested a departure or cessation of filming by the cameraman. In that event, he would have to stop or leave to avoid charges of trespass. But simply taking photos in, say, a shopping mall, isn't a violation in itself unless directed as above. The cops were not the owners and appeared to be acting in some other capacity.
US congresswoman Cynthia McKinney has come out and blamed the pro-Israel Lobby in America (AIPAC, ADL, ZOA, etc) for ruining her political career. While in congress she refused to sign the pro-Israel pledge and took a pro-Palestinian stance. Because of this, McKinney said “war was declared” on her by the Jewish lobby. In 2009 she told TIU's Ognir that “more than 99% of Congress work for Pro Zionist Israeli interests.”
The toughest police department in America in the 1960's and 1970's was in Milwaukee. The German chief had a special unit called the Tactical squad. This all White German unit ( 100 officers) roamed the hot spots in undercover cars with 3 officers. They were the elite of the force and tough. Blacks were terrified of them. I knew one white guy who when asked to leave a bar, did not move fast enough and was hit hard between the legs with a nightstick by a tac officer. He said the pain was unreal
"you know what you're under arrest" lmao. The cop basically admits there that he's abusing power. If only the victims had some power. Oh wait.. live streaming. Only a matter of time before people praise a terrorist for blowing this guy's fucking head off. Sure, the terrorist would be confused for the praise.. but only until he watched this video.
hahaha. you people are so stupid. americans. you people always look for trouble and the cops arrest your asses for it. you all have no idea how redicolous you are. try going to a different country are even someone here from a different country and tell them what happened. they are gona laugh at your ass like i do. like im right now. hahaha. spread the word. it might help you dumbasses.
Jesus Christ. You are a straight up moron. You told the officer you were "minding your own business". Hardly. You had your camera stuck in his face just because you think you can. You people make me sick. You do this crap just because "you can" and "cops can't do anything about it". Why? Why do you bother an officer in the middle of an investigation? Got Nothing better to do you FUCKING RETARD?
@traughber88 He broke no laws, and he was exercizing his freedom of press. If you dont want to exercize your rights then that is on you, you should not slander others for exercizing their's.
@MrSalty2010 yes is illegal to interfere with an officers investigation. the deputy told the guy to go away n he didn't care...guy was in did interfering with an investigation.
@MrSalty2010 .... which the citizen DID NOT DO! the police instigated conversation with him. DOCUMENTING AN EVENT DOES NOT WARRANT ARREST and IS CLEARLY NOT INTERFERING WITH A POLICE OFFICER'S INVESTIGATION! CASE CLOSED! COP BELONGS IN JAIL FOR INTENTIONALLY DEPRIVING SOMEONE OF THEIR DUE FREEDOM, OR KIDNAPPING AND FALSE INPRISONMENT.
@anainutta The cameraman followed the police repeatedly in a public place. That constitutes harassment 2nd degree, Scroll down to my previous comments and there's a link to a page (a government page) with the description of the crime, as well as obstruction and interfering with an investigation (also the local municipality regarding officer safety during said investigation/issuance of citation). Pretty simple stuff, the guy deserved to be arrested. He brought it on himself.
LOL! DID YOU CLOSE YOUR ACCOUNT BECAUSE YOU REALIZED HOW RETARDED YOU ARE FOR CONNECTING AN INTERNET IDENTITY WITH YOUR PERSONAL LIFE AS A POLICE OFFICER AT SAN JOAQUIN DELTA COLLEGE OUTSIDE OF STOCKTON, CALIFORNIA?!?!
@123NateDee I imagine you worship criminals in uniform with any stupid excuse.. but this kind of thuggish behavior is only known to facists in america which is I say ship all these precious american police thugs to some other country like Russia, and let's see how long they get away terrorizing people there.
@PanzerBlitz43 I dont like police at all actually.I was a victim of police brutality when I was 15. However its against the law to film on private property w/o consent. If you knew that you might have saved yourself a trip to jail. It seems you wanted to get arrested to make a point though.Either way good luck in the future.
@123NateDee screw your ridiculous american "property". No Americans have any rights or "property" anyway, they're brainwashed to believe that but it belongs to the US state and terrorist american corporations. Those corporations could throw toxic crap on your so called "private property" or your so called property confiscated in a heartbeat. america's an enslaved, pathetic joke. and where did you get the delusions that I was ever "arrested to make a point" Bad luck to you.
@PanzerBlitz43 Lol,alright guy. I didnt make the laws ,nor do I condone them. I just do my best to understand them.I agree w/ you ,so I think youre directing your anger in the wrong direction. Oh and bad luck to you too.LOL
@123NateDee oh and another thing, filming in front of a so called grocery store and all those other diseases called "commercial establishments" in american puke "law" speak, you know another of those millions of sterile blights on the landscape, selling what passes for "food" but is mostly toxins to fat, bloated, enslaved, brainless american trash, is not universally "against american law" US justice system terrorists and criminals can't even decide where to make that a felony, a fine or nothing
As a piglet all the way up in the Bay Area you just happen to know this specific cop out of thousands of cops in San Diego hundreds of miles away?
Really?
As a random Piglet outside of Stockton you know what's going on in this individual officer's life both personal and legal? This individual officer who serves some 700+ miles away from you?
Owned? for what? the 2 hours he might have sat in a holding cell?
148 is the most DISMISSED charge in California courts. The worst part of it is the dehumanizing shit the pigs do to you in the citation process, but all that does is further justify our feelings about your abuses of power.
This deputy is being prosecuted in Federal court. Who got owned again?
As long as he is more than five feet from the cops they can't do anything to you, unless you do something stupid then they can in this case no the cops were wrong.
ok this guy is kinda being annoying yeah but he does have the right to do this that women cannot take the video even if she is on it because they are in public, this is the cops getting annoyed with dumb people and unjustly using their power
The problem is not the women but the Abusive Deputy, This Deputy has the FEDS crawling althrough his past arrests and talking to people,he is going to jail, it is just a matter of time. This Cop beat a kid, and this cameraman filmed a lot of the issues brought up in the FEDERAL COURTS concerning this Deputy, this was nothing more then reta;itory, and when they go through his court testimonies of lies he is in a lot of trouble
@NewsNowSanDiego And in jail, this corrupt and abusive cop may be housed with inmates who are aware of his reputation. It's interesting how Jail House Justice Works.
The lady was never in danger of audio recording at the distance the guy was filming, the cops kept making it a big deal because of her, but if they would have explained to the lady that he's within his rights to do so, it would've been no problem
The tittle is techincally wrong -- the police officers never said stop filming.
he simply say that is too close and to back up -- as he was interfering with police. If the guy acutally stood back and filmed there would have been no problem
And the police acutal didnt have an issuse with filming -- it was the women who made a complaint
1st Amendment right violation right there! The NAZI soldier arrested a private citizen for recording the police. VIOLENT MONOPOLY!!!! The NAZI soldier disregarded the US Court of Appeals rulling.
@NewsNowSanDiego I'm just curious as to why you were filming in the first place. Was the female they were originally dealing with an aquantance of yours? Just curious
@abyssalish Federal law trumps state law, so it is not illegal. While you may get a ride to the police department I am confident that you will win in court.
Dude, when you go to the 7-11 you are being recorded!!! Are they going to arrest the owner???? No.... there is nothing illegal with recording anyone period. Where do we get this notion that operating a camera is illegal?
There are stipulations. In some states you can not record someone in private... however in public it's fair-game, as there is a general rule/law that gives no expectations to privacy, while in public.
@26yearstoorion No the lawyer get a new BMW, the dude get $5 he can use to upgrade his potato to a more current model for better pictures for his next cop harassment :) (silly cop though)
anytime you are in public you have no legal expectation of privacy- so audio is allowed to be recorded- you are watching someone videotape you that is implied consent for audio recording- the police DO NOT HAVE THE RIGHT TO ARREST THIS PERSON. It is unlawful detainment; violation of 1st and 4Th Amendments at minimum., WAKE UP AMERICA!
Oh and on the minding our own buisness if its your community and public commons it is your buisness to know how your lawenforcement is conducting them selves period
Gotta love the dumb lady saying she wants the camera.
Stink808 2 days ago
Hitler is back
poolthatsall 3 days ago
Did U see the 7 point Satan star on the cops. The 7 pointed star is a highly Satanic symbol, it is 2 points higher the pentagram. The star/shield of King Daved has 6 points and should B used instead. I would not trust a cop with a 7 point star coz they work/belong 2 Satan weather they know it or not.
634233284 4 days ago
Some people say cops are brave, but it seems to me they are afraid of tiny little digital cameras.
TheJDFLA 5 days ago
Well to be fair the women says she does not want to be filmed
Anaki99DK 1 week ago
@Anaki99DK and? She is in public, there is no expectation of privacy in PUBLIC. If she doesn't want to be filmed, too bad for her.
billydunwoody 1 week ago in playlist Uploaded videos
@billydunwoody So if i kept filming you, you would have no problem with that?
The man filming is just looking for trouble. The police are telling him to get lost on behalf of the women.
Anaki99DK 1 week ago
@Anaki99DK Woman ;D
Anaki99DK 1 week ago
@Anaki99DK You can film me all you want. I know its legal for you to do it, so there is nothing I can or will do to make you stop. Is it a little weird what he is doing? maybe. But certainly legal. When your in public, you can be recorded. Even the police have audio and sometimes video recordings to help themselves.
billydunwoody 1 week ago
wow, great zoom on that camera mate.
juggaloitis 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Dear Cops;
I'm a lot brighter than you.
If I decide you're to be filmed, you are powerless to stop me, and as it happens you will not be aware you are being filmed.
#
ll1lI 1 week ago
if user deletes comments, i will remake a duplicate video, and redistribute to stand up for law enforcement, video is ambush journalism, and never let officer have his right not to be filmed, if you like cameras go to England, and they will watch all citizens like a hawk, so dont put a camera in someones face. a free country is people not filming a person every where he goes.
researchdataaddict 1 week ago
@researchdataaddic Tit for tat works here, the police have dash cams without your consent.
26yearstoorion 1 week ago
guy filming only because he got in trouble for drunk driving, and now wants revenge by trying to get police to use brutality, he needs a hair cut, shower and a little respect for officer doing his job. its interfearing with an investigation, and offcers need safety distance from people, so they dont have to watch other people. guy filming police should have been patted down for drugs, he probably has some weed or he is definatly a crack head of some kind trying to attack the innocent officer.
researchdataaddict 1 week ago
When are you guys going to start repelling the laws that were recently enacted to protect Public Officials illegal acts. Not that most Cops are bad because most aren't but we are seeing a shift in the debased morals of Men being employed and given authority when they are dangerous enough without it.
Tracudown 2 weeks ago in playlist Favorite videos
Law Enforcementis way out of control......PERIOD!
nrsemike 2 weeks ago
I hope you sued the uniformed terrorists
bigbaldbull82 2 weeks ago
These are only city cops. Wait until the army starts enforcing the NDAA.
Support Ron Paul because he's the only candidate who'll repeal that crap. Obama lied, he said he wouldn't sign it, but he did. He now has the same powers as Stalin to fill the gulags with his political enemies.
kilgoretroutcanada 2 weeks ago
read all the other posts, 1st it is not against the Law to film, 2nd there is no distance thing, 3rd they testified to less then ten feet buy all evidence physical evidence shows me more then 25 feet away, 4th that Deputy has been hit with Lawsuits over my videos, it is Deputies like this ass that give all cops a bad name. He is a Corrupt Cop and even the Sheriff's Dets. say so
NewsNowSanDiego 2 weeks ago
I thought San Diego was in the USA the land of the free not the forma USSR.
chad24ist 2 weeks ago
@chad24ist there use to be a time in this country were we said what do you think this is RUSSIA ? Now Russia has more freedoms then us. In San Diego there is no 1st, 2nd, 4th, or 14th Amendments
NewsNowSanDiego 2 weeks ago
Pinghead are you really that stupid, you have to be if you posted that, if you look at earlier videos you will see a month earlier this same cop beat up a 16 year old kid for no reason, and the county is making him the bad guy trying to defend the rest in the Federal Civil Rights violations, which is what is going on here, and he has yet another suit or two coming, the same Deputy who is being accused of a home Invasion, by a local Attorney. Know some history and Law before you post stupid shit
NewsNowSanDiego 2 weeks ago
@NewsNowSanDiego I didn't know that so don't be so rude and call someone stupid jerk. You could have stated that simple fact. It still doesn't change what I said, He wan't filming from a distance he was walking up to the cop and filming just feet away. Again you don't have to be rude and it doesn't help your case by belittling people.
pinghead105 2 weeks ago
This guy could have filmed this from the side walk. If you noticed the guy was in the middle of car traffic, that is the officers concern, as well as the privacy of the person dealing with the arrest. This guy had every right to film this situation but didn't have the right to get inside the officers space. It is not illegal to post stuff like this on you tube or you tube wouldn't exist. Also the news would have to get everyone's permission to post there stuff.
pinghead105 2 weeks ago
He wan't really arrested for filming he was arrested for impeding an officer in his duties, When the officer said it was too close he should have backed off. The officer didn't have a problem with him filming he even said go over by the carts. This guy was walking up to the situation the cops were dealing with. Cops don't like it when people they don't know walk up to them when they are performing their duties. It is not illegal to post pics or video of people on the internet.
pinghead105 2 weeks ago
@pinghead105 yet the officer had to go out of his way to arrest a guy that was in his way, nice catch mcgoo.
PitBullsBiteHard 2 weeks ago
police like it or not have to put up with the public when not breaking laws. First ammendment protects free speech.
birdmanbl 3 weeks ago 2
Comment removed
birdmanbl 3 weeks ago
Oh... on behalf of those citizens present GFY S.D.P.D. *& have a nice day while doing it :-)
26yearstoorion 3 weeks ago
Everyone vid everything these placebo law 'enforcers' do and POST IT ON YOU TUBE! :-)
26yearstoorion 3 weeks ago
AMERICANS ARE FUCKED!!! THE ILLUMINATI IS ALREADY HOLD ALL OF YOU BUY YOUR BALLS!!!! GOOD BYE OL AMERICA!! HELLO NEW WORLD ORDER!!!
mrmetalgear2000 3 weeks ago
I hope people start filing law suits for false arrest. You have 7 years statute of limitations to file it against the city for false arrest.
ebayisajoke 4 weeks ago
you look like a dirty homeless person hahahahahaha faggot
960xray 4 weeks ago
bro take that flip camera and stick it up your ass. get a real job. i think you wanted to be a cop but your too crazy to pass the psych evaluation. LOSER! if you were a real reporter you would work for a real news station and not have yellow pages numbers in your phone.
960xray 4 weeks ago
NewsNowSanDiego, it look slike you are on PRIVATE PROPERTY, now, doesn't it? That would make the constitutionally protected right to film or photograph in PUBLIC not applicable th your filming on this video. You must be on public property to enact this right. I'm all for the right to film, but you are clearly being a complete jerk, filming for no reason just to get a rise out of and bother these cops. You are a first class bad example to those who are truly protecting constitutional freedom.
ProChoiceJesus 4 weeks ago
@ProChoiceJesus Common Use public areas are regarded as public areas.
MrABlinkin 4 weeks ago
Even the lady getting arrested wanted to kick your ass, she has a right to privacy, you are violating it by taping and recording them calling in her personal information. If the Media has to compy with privacy law, so do you.
renge99O9 4 weeks ago
@renge99O9 Nope if your in public you can film who ever the fuck you want.
steamingpoopfart 4 weeks ago
This is America... Land of the free, home of the dumbass. Besides Mental Illness, why would you harass cops? As someone arrested, but not convicted, you are interfering with my right to due process, posting video of me being arrested online is violating MY FUCKING RIGHTS as an American you shithead, how about I sue your stupid hippie ass? Let me guess, you are a Tea Party punk faggot too, that believes in law and order right? Otherwise spelled: H Y P O C R I T E
renge99O9 4 weeks ago
He was in no way interfering with the "investigation". The pirates brainwashed you.
himynameispuky 1 month ago
The have the stupidest cops out West. Green pants? Ewwwww.
MrGodTheFather 1 month ago
This cameraman is an idiot. He was interfering with a police investigation. The officers have a right to officer safety while conducting an investigation. They did not arrest you for filming but for getting to close and was interfering. They clearly said step back .They did not say stop filming you idiot.
greenmachine911 1 month ago 2
@greenmachine911 I do not see anything in this video that supports your claim of the citizen interfering with an investigation. Are you willing to point it out please?.... Darn, I missed it again! So do you believe that standing roughly a car's length or so from police while they are doing an investigation is an arrestable offense? The guy did not threaten the police or show any sign of being a potential danger to them. Maybe they felt threatened by what was on the video recording!? bully scum!
anainutta 1 month ago
@anainutta You stand behind an officer it is very concerning when you need to have your attention drawn to the person you are talking to. He was TOO close. If the officers were concerned about the video they would not have asked him step further back. They would have said stop taping. The one piece of fact I must share is the video taper has a history of assaults on peace officers and interfering in investigations. Try looking up 148 (a)(1) pc of the California penal code.
greenmachine911 1 month ago
@greenmachine911 Eeexxxaaaccctttlllyyy
steveecker 1 month ago
SIEG HIEL.........just obey the uniform.
neanderpaul14 1 month ago
as long as it is not for monetary gain you can film and post without consent as long as it is not a minor
godboy78 1 month ago
Nazi's
seatown001 1 month ago
@helobelow Actually, you can video tape someone in public. But you couldn't post it anywhere in public - or anywhere for the entire "world to see" - without that person's consent because that would be using their likeness without their permission.
mattyice661 1 month ago
@mattyice661: Have any proof behind this law you just made up?
Pafoofnik1 1 month ago
@Pafoofnik1 Lol it's a real law... That person can file a civil suit against you and the host of the domain for the website. It's perfectly legal to record ANYTHING in public, even fights etc (though it may be confiscated as evidence), you just don't have the rights to upload or display them without consent. Whether the person finds it online and prosecutes you is another matter entirely, so most people get away with it. This guy, however, also followed the officers (harassment)
steveecker 1 month ago
@steveecker: I see that you didn't cite this law. Why is that?
Probable because it doesn't exist.
Come on back with some independently verifiable evidence of this law you think exists.
Until then, I think I'll buy a paper and see what the paparazzi have dug up lately.
Pafoofnik1 1 month ago
@Pafoofnik1 Fair enough: wings(dot)buffalo(dot)edu/law/bclc/web/NewYork/ny3%28b%29.htm -- 240.26(b), Harassment 2nd degree, following in a public place etc, also could be the 1st degree. Obstructing police during an investigation. If he'd been convicted of 240.26 within ten years it becomes aggravated Harassment 1st, a Class A misdemeanor, rather than a class B. There's PLENTY those cops could have nailed him on, all he had to do was comply and not be a dick.
steveecker 1 month ago
@steveecker; I asked you for the law behind your comment that "you can video tape someone in public. But you couldn't post it anywhere in public - or anywhere for the entire "world to see" - without that person's consent"
This law you present here is about something completely different.
Pafoofnik1 1 month ago
@Pafoofnik1 No it's not lol. The violation here is posting it to a public access channel (the internet) without consent, the footage obtained was done so during a crime (harassment 2nd), making it confiscateable. You are NOT allowed to POST video footage of someone without consent, you're only allowed to record it. They can bring a civil suit (as many have) as well as the above mentioned criminal charges. Call a lawyer, ask for yourself. That person's likeness is what makes it so.
steveecker 1 month ago
@steveecker said: "You are NOT allowed to POST video footage of someone without consent, you're only allowed to record it."
I didn't ask you to talk some more, I asked you for the law behind your comment
Now you say: "Call a lawyer, ask for yourself."
No thanks. I'm not the one that said there's a law before actually researching to see if it really exists.
You did.
Pafoofnik1 1 month ago
@Pafoofnik1 And I gave you a VERY SPECIFIC law regarding this incident. It is harassment 2nd degree, as well as obstruction of justice as the officers were issuing a citation. He interfered with the investigation and followed them repeatedly. Posting it online without consent is grounds for a civil suit, because their likenesses become "intellectual property" and thus, it's illegal. I don't know how much more clearly you want me to explain this to you, it's pretty simple.
steveecker 3 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@steveecker said: "And I gave you a VERY SPECIFIC law regarding this incident."
Your very specific law doesn't say a thing about your guess that "you can video tape someone in public. But you couldn't post it anywhere in public - or anywhere for the entire "world to see" - without that person's consent"
which is what I asked you to prove.
"I don't know how much more clearly you want me to explain this to you,"
I don't want your explanation. I want to see this law you say exists.
Pafoofnik1 3 weeks ago
@steveecker Shut up asshole. He was standing still, a good distance away. He said nothing and obstructed nothing and posting it is completely legal you idiot
amaturemusicians 3 weeks ago 2
@amaturemusicians Hey genius, how EXACTLY can you follow police officers around if you're standing still? He was too close, and was asked repeatedly to NOT follow them. He impeded an investigation by distracting the officers from their task (otherwise known as obstruction). You're obviously not educated and just looking to fight, grow up. You call me an idiot yet I've cited specific laws that he's broken, and it's clear in this video. Go try it to your local officer...
steveecker 2 weeks ago
@steveecker Shut up cunt. He didn't impede anything and if those officers can't concentrate on what they're doing....those are over paid security guards you pussy
amaturemusicians 2 weeks ago
@amaturemusicians Lol seriously bud? How mature/old are you? You have NOTHING better to do with your life than pick fights on youtube because you have daddy issues? Grow up, bye bye... This is called being mature, watch and learn.. Then click the delete button.
steveecker 2 weeks ago
@steveecker Public actions are public property. Are you a fucking moron?
amaturemusicians 3 weeks ago
@amaturemusicians As for you not being able to READ what I wrote, when you do something in public, that makes it public. Therefore nulling your right to privacy. Your LIKENESS becomes intellectual property of yourself and though everyone is free to record in a public place, they need YOUR PERMISSION to upload it to public access channels (eg the internet). Perhaps you should crack a law book open from time to time, or maybe even google. You stink of troll.... Grow up.
steveecker 2 weeks ago
@Pafoofnik1 I'm really not gonna go searching for it, sorry.
mattyice661 2 weeks ago
@mattyice661: You said there is a law, but didn't look beforehand to see if it really existed?
OK then.
Pafoofnik1 2 weeks ago
@Pafoofnik1 Yup. You've won. Congratulations. Enjoy your evening.
mattyice661 2 weeks ago
@mattyice661 I don't believe this is true. If they are out in public then they are fair game. If you notice on Youtube there is no consent for any of the videos and they contain a lot of pics of Kids.
pinghead105 1 month ago
@pinghead105 I believe they are "fair game" to record, but I don't think it's beyond the realm of possibility to prosecute them in court for posting the video and using your likeness.
mattyice661 2 weeks ago
the end of the nwo is upon us
iamaronpaulblican 1 month ago
people like this are the reason they don't want people filming them, the camera guy ran up on the cop, he is lucky he didn't get hurt, I'm all for filming these thugs but do it the right way...
savagenomore 1 month ago
lol that cop has a case of little man syndrom
jocell202 1 month ago
skater 21 are you really that stupid
NewsNowSanDiego 1 month ago
Is this camera man for real? What a dick head. A person with a camera could cause a riot puting the arrested person at risk and especially the police officer at risk. This 1st amendment is one thing, abusing it is another. Take your camera and shove it up your ass spinning.
runningwolfkenpo 1 month ago
Officer safety, the man filming wasn't listening. The police officer clearly said just to step back and there wouldn't have been a problem.
skater21 1 month ago 2
What a COWARD.. These cops need to be fired as quickly as possible...They do not have the people interest what so ever. TRUE COWARDS
cshawn07 1 month ago
What is the point of even filming? Just trying to stir up controversy. People like you make me sick. Get a life, you pathetic loser. And by the way, being that close to a police investigation is considered interfering.
danthebest 1 month ago
@danthebest
"If we don't exercise our rights, we will lose them." -David Sohappy-
Transparency in government includes filming police on duty. The man looked to be about 15 feet or more away. Imagine the outcome of the Rodney King beating trial without the video.
pinballwyz 1 month ago
Certainly this cop was abusive. You should have kept your distance from him. You are brave by doing this.
11MRKARL 1 month ago
You scream about them "violating" his rights. They told him where to go stand if he wanted to stay out of trouble. When he told the cops THEY should concentrate on their stuff, he was almost clipped by a car. He was obstructing traffic which alone is against the law. Beyond that, what about the woman's right to privacy the camera man violated. You could here on the recording that she didn't want her picture taken or any video filmed? They put her in the car because she was about to go after him.
zentner18 1 month ago
@zentner18 Actually out in public there is no assumption of or right to privacy.
IAmNonAnonymous 1 month ago
@IAmNonAnonymous If it were strictly video you might be correct. But once you start taping what is said it is actually classified as wiretapping.
zentner18 1 month ago
@zentner18 Due to the audio. Good Point. But the cop still seemed abusive and power hungry.
IAmNonAnonymous 1 month ago
@zentner18 No the supreme court ruled that was not what the wire tapping law was designed to prevent and public officials in public places providing a public service may be recorded by private citizens.
helobelow 1 month ago
@helobelow Public officials, but what about the woman they were talking too? She was not a public official and his video recording of what she was saying goes against her rights.
zentner18 1 month ago
@zentner18
No it doesn't. Learn where the legal boundaries are. She had no expectation of privacy in that public setting. The law doesn't make police officers 2nd class citizens. They have the same rights we all have--e.g. they can film too.
pinballwyz 1 month ago
@helobelow I'll also add this. If the woman would have stated that she wanted this person to film what was going on, there would be no problem. But when she made clear, from which you can tell by her speaking, that she didn't want to be recorded, he then violated her rights to privacy.
zentner18 1 month ago
@zentner18
That's simply incorrect. You have no more right to privacy in a public venue than the police. Police routinely film using dashboard cameras without seeking consent.
pinballwyz 1 month ago
@zentner18 Wrong silly rabbit. I can even video tape an imbecile like you if you are in pubic no matter what. Then I could post it next to the monkey house at the zoo for every one in the world to see the comparison and similarities. Im so sick of all the stupid Monday morning quarterbacks that dont know their ass from a whole in the ground! Your in public, you can be filmed, check the supreme court rulings dummy!
helobelow 1 month ago
@helobelow well said
pinghead105 1 month ago
@zentner18
Care to cite some recent case law? I believe you're incorrect. It's not the mode of recording, it's whether there's an expectation of privacy. Typically, in a public setting, there is not.
pinballwyz 1 month ago
@pinballwyz Common law generally holds that if in a public place, you can record anything you see, except you can't harass, not highly intrusive or overzealous. Galella v. Onassis (2nd Cir. 1973): First Amendment doesn't give right to harass.
Can't use electronic or photographic equipuipment to enhance vision (can't use telephoto lens to see what can't see without it).
You can eavesdrop in a public place; up to people in conversation to make private
zentner18 1 month ago
@zentner18
The woman was embarrassed over her arrest, but that doesn't translate to a right to privacy in a public venue.
pinballwyz 1 month ago
Arent you on private property, so you should need the permission of the land owner?
adrianburns93 1 month ago
@adrianburns93
Not if it's open/available to the general public...unless the owner arrived and requested a departure or cessation of filming by the cameraman. In that event, he would have to stop or leave to avoid charges of trespass. But simply taking photos in, say, a shopping mall, isn't a violation in itself unless directed as above. The cops were not the owners and appeared to be acting in some other capacity.
pinballwyz 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Who REALLY runs our world?
US congresswoman Cynthia McKinney has come out and blamed the pro-Israel Lobby in America (AIPAC, ADL, ZOA, etc) for ruining her political career. While in congress she refused to sign the pro-Israel pledge and took a pro-Palestinian stance. Because of this, McKinney said “war was declared” on her by the Jewish lobby. In 2009 she told TIU's Ognir that “more than 99% of Congress work for Pro Zionist Israeli interests.”
w(dot)zioncrimefactory com/jew-world-order
LordLindsey12 1 month ago
LOL...LOL...LOL....ROTFLMAO...LOL...YOUR IN A LOT OF TROUBLE....LOL...LOL....LOL
nonassumsit 1 month ago
0:33 - Blackbird is laughing at the stupid Humans
iborrada 1 month ago
The toughest police department in America in the 1960's and 1970's was in Milwaukee. The German chief had a special unit called the Tactical squad. This all White German unit ( 100 officers) roamed the hot spots in undercover cars with 3 officers. They were the elite of the force and tough. Blacks were terrified of them. I knew one white guy who when asked to leave a bar, did not move fast enough and was hit hard between the legs with a nightstick by a tac officer. He said the pain was unreal
390bullitt1968 1 month ago
haha i know why the woman was being arrested in the first place she refussed to give then free coffee from starbucks
chivafan2012 1 month ago
@NewsNowSanDiego How many feet were you from the officers as you recorded this?
greggh 2 months ago
"you know what you're under arrest" lmao. The cop basically admits there that he's abusing power. If only the victims had some power. Oh wait.. live streaming. Only a matter of time before people praise a terrorist for blowing this guy's fucking head off. Sure, the terrorist would be confused for the praise.. but only until he watched this video.
TomGezen 2 months ago
He should've minded his own businesses..
evilsoldiers 2 months ago
agents of tyranny strike again. "law enforcement" officers making up their own laws and kidnapping people.
Katoosha2006 2 months ago 2
@Katoosha2006
That's the rule rather than the exception.
pinballwyz 1 month ago
He could've resisted the arrest according to California law. That wouldn't violate PC148 becuase it doesn't apply to unlawful arrests.
himynameispuky 2 months ago
OUR POLICE NEED RE-TRAINING !!!!!!!
kckarma007 2 months ago
More Jack Booted Thugs in Uniform!
Snapper314 2 months ago
It is amaysing to see the diverance between the US and EU countrys.Our goverment advises us to use our cameras on evry occasion.To produse evidens!
jannekei 2 months ago
148 PC
SelectiveINfusion 2 months ago
hahaha. you people are so stupid. americans. you people always look for trouble and the cops arrest your asses for it. you all have no idea how redicolous you are. try going to a different country are even someone here from a different country and tell them what happened. they are gona laugh at your ass like i do. like im right now. hahaha. spread the word. it might help you dumbasses.
Alexgotnicebody 2 months ago
Jesus Christ. You are a straight up moron. You told the officer you were "minding your own business". Hardly. You had your camera stuck in his face just because you think you can. You people make me sick. You do this crap just because "you can" and "cops can't do anything about it". Why? Why do you bother an officer in the middle of an investigation? Got Nothing better to do you FUCKING RETARD?
traughber88 2 months ago
@traughber88 He broke no laws, and he was exercizing his freedom of press. If you dont want to exercize your rights then that is on you, you should not slander others for exercizing their's.
teenprepper96 2 months ago in playlist Liked videos
It's not illegal to film however, it IS ILLEGAL to interfere with a police officer's investigation.
MrSalty2010 2 months ago 4
@MrSalty2010 illegal in the US means nothing
PanzerBlitz43 2 months ago
@MrSalty2010 yes is illegal to interfere with an officers investigation. the deputy told the guy to go away n he didn't care...guy was in did interfering with an investigation.
souaxiong18 2 months ago
@souaxiong18 no he told the officer to concentrate on his job. the dude was saying nothing.
EVANBJAMES 2 months ago
@MrSalty2010 .... which the citizen DID NOT DO! the police instigated conversation with him. DOCUMENTING AN EVENT DOES NOT WARRANT ARREST and IS CLEARLY NOT INTERFERING WITH A POLICE OFFICER'S INVESTIGATION! CASE CLOSED! COP BELONGS IN JAIL FOR INTENTIONALLY DEPRIVING SOMEONE OF THEIR DUE FREEDOM, OR KIDNAPPING AND FALSE INPRISONMENT.
anainutta 1 month ago
@anainutta The cameraman followed the police repeatedly in a public place. That constitutes harassment 2nd degree, Scroll down to my previous comments and there's a link to a page (a government page) with the description of the crime, as well as obstruction and interfering with an investigation (also the local municipality regarding officer safety during said investigation/issuance of citation). Pretty simple stuff, the guy deserved to be arrested. He brought it on himself.
steveecker 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@steveecker said: "The cameraman followed the police repeatedly in a public place. That constitutes harassment 2nd degree,"
Please cite the law that makes it a '2nd degree' harassment... to follow someone.
If you're spout to spout out guesses as laws, then expect people to ask for proof.
Pafoofnik1 1 month ago
Comment removed
ahmetbyrm 4 weeks ago
oh look !!! -- someones learned how to be a CUNT.
bluelibra65 2 months ago
@Mellout2018
LOL! DID YOU CLOSE YOUR ACCOUNT BECAUSE YOU REALIZED HOW RETARDED YOU ARE FOR CONNECTING AN INTERNET IDENTITY WITH YOUR PERSONAL LIFE AS A POLICE OFFICER AT SAN JOAQUIN DELTA COLLEGE OUTSIDE OF STOCKTON, CALIFORNIA?!?!
HumansAreAnimals 2 months ago
@Mellout2018
Are you as overweight and ugly as your cousin?
HumansAreAnimals 2 months ago
It appears you are on private property where people DO and CAN have an expectation of privacy. I imagine thats why you were arrested.
123NateDee 2 months ago
@123NateDee I imagine you worship criminals in uniform with any stupid excuse.. but this kind of thuggish behavior is only known to facists in america which is I say ship all these precious american police thugs to some other country like Russia, and let's see how long they get away terrorizing people there.
PanzerBlitz43 2 months ago
@PanzerBlitz43 I dont like police at all actually.I was a victim of police brutality when I was 15. However its against the law to film on private property w/o consent. If you knew that you might have saved yourself a trip to jail. It seems you wanted to get arrested to make a point though.Either way good luck in the future.
123NateDee 2 months ago
@123NateDee screw your ridiculous american "property". No Americans have any rights or "property" anyway, they're brainwashed to believe that but it belongs to the US state and terrorist american corporations. Those corporations could throw toxic crap on your so called "private property" or your so called property confiscated in a heartbeat. america's an enslaved, pathetic joke. and where did you get the delusions that I was ever "arrested to make a point" Bad luck to you.
PanzerBlitz43 2 months ago
@PanzerBlitz43 Lol,alright guy. I didnt make the laws ,nor do I condone them. I just do my best to understand them.I agree w/ you ,so I think youre directing your anger in the wrong direction. Oh and bad luck to you too.LOL
123NateDee 2 months ago
Comment removed
PanzerBlitz43 2 months ago
@PanzerBlitz43: Prejudiced much?
Pafoofnik1 2 months ago
@123NateDee oh and another thing, filming in front of a so called grocery store and all those other diseases called "commercial establishments" in american puke "law" speak, you know another of those millions of sterile blights on the landscape, selling what passes for "food" but is mostly toxins to fat, bloated, enslaved, brainless american trash, is not universally "against american law" US justice system terrorists and criminals can't even decide where to make that a felony, a fine or nothing
PanzerBlitz43 2 months ago
@Mellout2018
Really?
As a piglet all the way up in the Bay Area you just happen to know this specific cop out of thousands of cops in San Diego hundreds of miles away?
Really?
As a random Piglet outside of Stockton you know what's going on in this individual officer's life both personal and legal? This individual officer who serves some 700+ miles away from you?
HumansAreAnimals 2 months ago
@Mellout2018
Owned? for what? the 2 hours he might have sat in a holding cell?
148 is the most DISMISSED charge in California courts. The worst part of it is the dehumanizing shit the pigs do to you in the citation process, but all that does is further justify our feelings about your abuses of power.
This deputy is being prosecuted in Federal court. Who got owned again?
HumansAreAnimals 2 months ago 2
As long as he is more than five feet from the cops they can't do anything to you, unless you do something stupid then they can in this case no the cops were wrong.
mwbmc 2 months ago
ok this guy is kinda being annoying yeah but he does have the right to do this that women cannot take the video even if she is on it because they are in public, this is the cops getting annoyed with dumb people and unjustly using their power
OOOkorthosOOO 2 months ago
Attention whore
frontdesk123 2 months ago
Do they teach cops what people are allowed to do and what they cant do or do they just give them a gun and say (go getum tiger)
corbinadamwillis 2 months ago 15
lol arrested for filming.... LOL
obamasucksdick99 2 months ago
The problem is not the women but the Abusive Deputy, This Deputy has the FEDS crawling althrough his past arrests and talking to people,he is going to jail, it is just a matter of time. This Cop beat a kid, and this cameraman filmed a lot of the issues brought up in the FEDERAL COURTS concerning this Deputy, this was nothing more then reta;itory, and when they go through his court testimonies of lies he is in a lot of trouble
NewsNowSanDiego 2 months ago 8
@NewsNowSanDiego And in jail, this corrupt and abusive cop may be housed with inmates who are aware of his reputation. It's interesting how Jail House Justice Works.
IAmNonAnonymous 1 month ago
The lady was never in danger of audio recording at the distance the guy was filming, the cops kept making it a big deal because of her, but if they would have explained to the lady that he's within his rights to do so, it would've been no problem
TheBarerOfBadNews 2 months ago
The tittle is techincally wrong -- the police officers never said stop filming.
he simply say that is too close and to back up -- as he was interfering with police. If the guy acutally stood back and filmed there would have been no problem
And the police acutal didnt have an issuse with filming -- it was the women who made a complaint
badpanda84 2 months ago
1st Amendment right violation right there! The NAZI soldier arrested a private citizen for recording the police. VIOLENT MONOPOLY!!!! The NAZI soldier disregarded the US Court of Appeals rulling.
mycatpumpkinful 2 months ago
Mr. Scottrocks you are 100% correct
NewsNowSanDiego 3 months ago
any time you see a cop film them because most cop are the bad guys..
MrScottrocks 3 months ago
Then the people in Illy, need to hand their Politicians, Judges and Cops a copy of the 1st Amendment
NewsNowSanDiego 3 months ago
@NewsNowSanDiego I'm just curious as to why you were filming in the first place. Was the female they were originally dealing with an aquantance of yours? Just curious
elms91 3 months ago
@abyssalish Federal law trumps state law, so it is not illegal. While you may get a ride to the police department I am confident that you will win in court.
Tkhobbs1 3 months ago
It is, however, illegal to audio record police in Illinois
abyssalish 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
JC you are a Fucking bitch
Spyder529 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
"You're taking a picture of me, I want the camera"
Hopefully they arrested her for just flat out stupidity, considering law-enforcement is now making up laws as they go...
fmnma1 3 months ago
Comment removed
fmnma1 3 months ago
nobody ever says what happens afterwards!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! so what happen? you sue? you get a fine? you get released? what happended
nothadnotbad 3 months ago
Easy lawsuit won for false arrest....More idiots in power
wildflavor429 3 months ago
piggys...
Intoxikacion 3 months ago
Dude, when you go to the 7-11 you are being recorded!!! Are they going to arrest the owner???? No.... there is nothing illegal with recording anyone period. Where do we get this notion that operating a camera is illegal?
CaribbeanPirate 3 months ago
@CaribbeanPirate
There are stipulations. In some states you can not record someone in private... however in public it's fair-game, as there is a general rule/law that gives no expectations to privacy, while in public.
fmnma1 3 months ago
CONGRATS (Dumb cop(s)) you just gave another sleaze bag lawyer another new BMW! *and oh course the guy you ILLEGALLY arrested gets one too.. YES!
26yearstoorion 3 months ago
@26yearstoorion No the lawyer get a new BMW, the dude get $5 he can use to upgrade his potato to a more current model for better pictures for his next cop harassment :) (silly cop though)
goguhu 2 months ago
I'm a cop if u cross the street I'll beat you if u breath I'll shoot u in your mouth ...those filthy pigs will get what coming to them in the end
ar15a2 3 months ago
I'M THE BOSS OF U THATS THE WAY DIRTY COPS THINK....
MrScottrocks 3 months ago
anytime you are in public you have no legal expectation of privacy- so audio is allowed to be recorded- you are watching someone videotape you that is implied consent for audio recording- the police DO NOT HAVE THE RIGHT TO ARREST THIS PERSON. It is unlawful detainment; violation of 1st and 4Th Amendments at minimum., WAKE UP AMERICA!
mechanicx1578 3 months ago
@mechanicx1578
Boston PIGS learned that real quick.. i.e Glik :)
fmnma1 3 months ago
what happened to the criminal case?
ipinews 3 months ago
Oh and on the minding our own buisness if its your community and public commons it is your buisness to know how your lawenforcement is conducting them selves period
MrSokitumi0007 3 months ago
Ill film anywhere they film me even in court matter of fact especially in COURT =P Just say no to Nazism )o,,,
MrSokitumi0007 3 months ago