yes, human owns right to it, but.. he has conscience and brain. Will to chooce. If she chooses. to give up embroeo.. then she has that right.. Can u comprehend that? Can you process that?
Well, actually, no, they don't... an embryo isn't a fetus, it doesn't resembles something, it has no organs nor any defined tissues, that's why it's usefull. It's just a bunch of undefined cells, waiting to become something.
The only way they can become something is if they continue to develop, by keeping it alive. Pull it apart and develop the infant in pieces, or implant it and develop it as a whole.
MD concerned about step 2. Using and destroying existing embryos for research over the next decade or 2 may or may not result in treatments. The conditions mentioned constitute tens of millions in the US alone. How many more, how many embryo factories? How many women donors will be adversely affected? When in the life cycle of a human being is it okay to own, destroy, and sell it ? The stem cells in an embryo are most valuable to the human being that
If he is the one saying the garbage about woman donors being adversly affected then he knows jack shit. These are embryos marked for destruction after in vitro fertilization. The donor already has their child and they have given away all they could to infertile couples. The rest get thrown away.
Yeah 400k possible cell lines that can be used for several years for research and produce enough cells to treat who knows how many people. The cells duplicate. They are not stuck with just what they are originally given. That 400k could be used for most of the lines of research and as couples continue to get in vitro fertilization there will continue to be more that could potentially be used. Now YOU do the math and this time use a calculator instead of the surface of a glass of water.
Each embryo has one human's worth of cells, only so many pancreatic islet cells. If the cells duplicated forever, you'd only need one embryo, forever.
No you are incorrect. Will they last forever. Nothing does but the same line of cells can be used for a lot more than a single experiment. Have you run out of straws to grasp at yet.
24 million(diabetics)-400k embryos= 23.6 million more embryos needed. The research being conducted is how to develop pancreatic islet cells for transplant into diabetics.
That's just one disease.
Be a truthful realist. Cost-prohibitive going nowhere research that could adversely affect many fertile women.
The real future of stem cell research is using adult stem cells. A study is now being formed using adult stem cells to treat ALS.
No be a truthful realist. It isn't 1 for every single patient. That is the same type of logic used by the idiots trying to say that the creation story is literaly true. They take what they want out of it and ignore everything else. You take that they need these embryos for research and then ignore the fact that 1 embryo can be used for several experiments and continue to be used for a few years before they are no longer viable and make up that they would need one for every patient.
Helllooooo, after the experiments are done, the cells(products) will be needed in massive numbers to treat patients, they'll need to be kept alive, transported, etc. Embryo factories.
!. Medical research by its very nature is slow and methodical. If they did it fast the results could very easily be dangerous.
2. You have no idea how many patients they would be able to treat with a single line of cells. And since you do not know you are making it up as you go along to convince people that your delusions are correct.
!!!!!!!!!!!!!if you think that using stem cells are bad, you are completely ignorant. Blastocysts(often mistakenly called embryonic a charged word that has created a political and moral brouhaha)IF THEY MATURE they have the ability to differentiate themselves. get your facts straight. then reply to me.
ign - For specific facts on President Bush's Veto, go to "Tony Snow on Embryonic Stem Cell Veto" I think the video should answer most of your questions. If not, maybe I can fill-in some of it.
THANK YOU for this factual, informative presentation! I am "pro-life" but support embryonic stem cell researc h as outlined in S 5, to be presented to the 110th Congress soon. Tell your Senators to vote "YES!"
yes, human owns right to it, but.. he has conscience and brain. Will to chooce. If she chooses. to give up embroeo.. then she has that right.. Can u comprehend that? Can you process that?
davaidavai8 2 years ago
Well, actually, no, they don't... an embryo isn't a fetus, it doesn't resembles something, it has no organs nor any defined tissues, that's why it's usefull. It's just a bunch of undefined cells, waiting to become something.
MaluGorga 2 years ago
The only way they can become something is if they continue to develop, by keeping it alive. Pull it apart and develop the infant in pieces, or implant it and develop it as a whole.
I vote for the whole.
oran6es 1 year ago
MD concerned about step 2. Using and destroying existing embryos for research over the next decade or 2 may or may not result in treatments. The conditions mentioned constitute tens of millions in the US alone. How many more, how many embryo factories? How many women donors will be adversely affected? When in the life cycle of a human being is it okay to own, destroy, and sell it ? The stem cells in an embryo are most valuable to the human being that
owns them. Period.
oran6es 2 years ago
Says the guy who knows nothing about the subject he is commenting on.
olstar18 1 year ago
MDs know lots about this particular subject.
oran6es 1 year ago
If he is the one saying the garbage about woman donors being adversly affected then he knows jack shit. These are embryos marked for destruction after in vitro fertilization. The donor already has their child and they have given away all they could to infertile couples. The rest get thrown away.
olstar18 1 year ago
@olstar18
400k spare embryos
24 million diabetics and climbing
one disease, do the math
oran6es 1 year ago
Yeah 400k possible cell lines that can be used for several years for research and produce enough cells to treat who knows how many people. The cells duplicate. They are not stuck with just what they are originally given. That 400k could be used for most of the lines of research and as couples continue to get in vitro fertilization there will continue to be more that could potentially be used. Now YOU do the math and this time use a calculator instead of the surface of a glass of water.
olstar18 1 year ago
Each embryo has one human's worth of cells, only so many pancreatic islet cells. If the cells duplicated forever, you'd only need one embryo, forever.
You are incorrect.
oran6es 1 year ago
No you are incorrect. Will they last forever. Nothing does but the same line of cells can be used for a lot more than a single experiment. Have you run out of straws to grasp at yet.
olstar18 1 year ago
24 million(diabetics)-400k embryos= 23.6 million more embryos needed. The research being conducted is how to develop pancreatic islet cells for transplant into diabetics.
That's just one disease.
Be a truthful realist. Cost-prohibitive going nowhere research that could adversely affect many fertile women.
The real future of stem cell research is using adult stem cells. A study is now being formed using adult stem cells to treat ALS.
Stay tuned.
oran6es 1 year ago
No be a truthful realist. It isn't 1 for every single patient. That is the same type of logic used by the idiots trying to say that the creation story is literaly true. They take what they want out of it and ignore everything else. You take that they need these embryos for research and then ignore the fact that 1 embryo can be used for several experiments and continue to be used for a few years before they are no longer viable and make up that they would need one for every patient.
olstar18 1 year ago
@olstar18
Helllooooo, after the experiments are done, the cells(products) will be needed in massive numbers to treat patients, they'll need to be kept alive, transported, etc. Embryo factories.
This research is going nowhere fast.
oran6es 1 year ago
!. Medical research by its very nature is slow and methodical. If they did it fast the results could very easily be dangerous.
2. You have no idea how many patients they would be able to treat with a single line of cells. And since you do not know you are making it up as you go along to convince people that your delusions are correct.
olstar18 1 year ago
!!!!!!!!!!!!!if you think that using stem cells are bad, you are completely ignorant. Blastocysts(often mistakenly called embryonic a charged word that has created a political and moral brouhaha)IF THEY MATURE they have the ability to differentiate themselves. get your facts straight. then reply to me.
jwong1983 4 years ago
The issue with stem cells is the lack of knowledge that adult stem cells are a clinical reality.
cellmedicine 4 years ago 2
Malu - Love the music!
Unklebillybob 4 years ago
ill tell u whos stoppin the development of stem cell research, mr bush.
ignishun 4 years ago
ign - For specific facts on President Bush's Veto, go to "Tony Snow on Embryonic Stem Cell Veto" I think the video should answer most of your questions. If not, maybe I can fill-in some of it.
Unklebillybob 4 years ago
What the hell is wrong with the text? Couldn't you remove line breaks before inserting it into video?
metalim 4 years ago
I tried to... But some phrases couldn't get connected because it wouldn't fit.
Besides, I did the text on Paint...
MaluGorga 4 years ago
THANK YOU for this factual, informative presentation! I am "pro-life" but support embryonic stem cell researc h as outlined in S 5, to be presented to the 110th Congress soon. Tell your Senators to vote "YES!"
TNpegleg 5 years ago
Brilliant. I love it.
You present the facts without bias, then you come to the only logical conclusion that be reached.
There is no 'morale' debate. There's simply a religious debate.
When are the rest of us going to stop letting someone elses beliefs govern the way we live?
Thankyou so much for this video. I couldn't've done it better myself.
MikeT2005 5 years ago