to all af yas that comment this vedio serch for loose chane 9/11 and ya will see that there were no terrorist it whats the fucking goverment the fucking u.s. goverment and the 1993 boming of the towere one the goverment the c.i.a the f.b.i the play the shit out of some guy named ramzi ahmed yousef
Does absolutely anyone else out there see that there is a ridiculously huge difference between giving someone who allegedly did not pay their taxes a "fair" trial and giving animals from another country who openly admit that they want Americans extinct, a "fair" trial.....
you can't really criticize Scott because his analysis is completely objective. he honestly chooses not to use opinions, and only rely on facts he has seen. this is the way he was been instructed to think in law school.
People might think that this guy is professional and just doing his job and things like that,but no jury in this world, no matter what their verdict is, would change the fact the these terrorists murdered thousands of innocent lives. The point here is..I mean.I would quit my job if it calls for me to defend murdering terrorists, no matter how big the money is.rather than be a cowardly SOB and hide behind "being professional".no decent human being would.wasn't that what made America so great ??
All of the people calling the attorney here a criminal or whatever are completley *clueless* not only about the United States Constitution and justice system but also that the US GOVERNMENT orchestrated not only 9/11 itself but also the creation and *maintenance* of Al Qaeda!
people do deserve a fair trial, but why take them back to NYC? its just calling for another attack. that lawyer has some balls to be able to walk around in public...or maby he's just a complete idiot. i say fuck the death penalty, let them rot in a prison of some kind. death penalty is too easy of an escape for what they did...
The real weasel is Obama granting these terrorists rights and snuggling up to Islamic governments as much as he can. But that's what you get for voting the son of a Muslim into office.
Do any of you honestly believe the lawyer actually wants too see these men acquitted? They are entitled to a fair trial by the Constitution and that is what he is trying to give them. These terrorists are scum but nonetheless were tortured by our own security forces. We have stooped down to their level in our methods and that is wrong, according to the 8th amendment. They deserve a fair trial. It's what makes America, America and the rules are what makes us better. Attacking this man is idiotic.
@imbored48375 They are war criminals - they, the Muslim terrorists would say so themselves; warriors for Islam, jihad etc. As such they shouldn't be recieving an American trial at all, and should be judged in a military court, and not be given rights that should be exclusive to Americans.
I completely agree with you. I thought they had already been found guilty in military court? Correct me, if I'm wrong. This whole civilian court business is all a show. However because we are already beginning this process I was just trying to say that they do deserve a fair trial, regardless of who they are. That is what makes America so great.
I do not believe that the terrorists will (or should) go free but...
"Justification" for the murder of thousands of innocent people is something that the US has been doing - its called "fighting terror with terror". Sound familiar?
I say at the next terrorist attack that there is we should put this motherfucker lawyer in the attack and let the jurors decide if he was murdered or not. This fuck nut lawyer is a perfect example of a wasted life. He kept saying that he is honored that he is going to represent these garbage men who killed thousands of people......what a low life piece of shit he is!!
I don't disagree with you at all about America killing people which is why these terrorists hate America among other things. But the question to this fuck nut lawyer was clear as it could be and he just played around the question like a little bitch he is and could not give a stright answer.....Just like all fucked up liberals do anyways. Put the politics, law and other BS aside and answer the fucking question. Was it Murder??? HELL FUCKING YEAH IT WAS!!!!
@matrix3000k he is asking if there is any justification for killing thousands of people, well your government thinks there's justification to kill hundreds of thousands of people. He's stupid even asking these questions. As for a military tribunal if that was justified then surely it couldn't be murder. The interviewer is an ass.
Ok so he asked the question and the lawyer still played around the question and could not give a stright answer. Its like if I ask you "would you like cheese on your burger"? and you give me an answer I love cheese on my chicken sandwhich. But thats not my question in the first place. Sound like to me the lawyer is more of an ass than the interviewer! but if that your opinion and you are entitled to it and thats fine as well
Scott Fenstermaker is complete fool and a lowlife. Anybody who cannot give a straight answer to the questions he was asked is nothing more than an accessory to the murders those terrorists committed.
You poor yokels who support discrimination against terrorists are fools. Please don't misunderstand me, though. The idea of terrorism, to me, is repugnant. However AS HUMAN BEING WHO HAVE INALIENABLE NATURAL RIGHTS, they are allowed their trial. If it's an open-and-shut case, then there you have it. They'll go to prison anyway, no one is worse for the wear.
My issue is the 9/11 high horse the government and MSM (notably FOX) ride on, even though it's OBVIOUS the 9/11 story was a fraud.
I was just trying to give a number to make a point. And i'm not referring to 2003 to present, just 2003 deaths caused by U.S. military attacks
But hey i think 9/11 was a conpiracy we uses to unite americans to support a government's war.
The US did it many times in the past. Just like when we sailed a US ship into german territory.Got it attacked.And used it to start a war with Germany.
Sorry if i sound like i'm attacking the US im just trying to change people's minds
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
You all are all idiots. Because on TV you all saw the word terrorist and then some newscaster saying Muslim, and now suddenly all Muslims are terrorists.
Complete stupidity.
I bet everyone's gonna say im a terrorist now for defending them, even though im not defending them im just insulting you all
Yes but Adam's defense was that those men were about to be hurt by the mob and they only did what they did because they needed to protect themselves. And self defense is what any rational person would do.
That does not compare to killing ~3,000 innocent people who were not harming you in any way, shape, or form.
The John Adams defense does not fit with these terrorists.
I hate most lawyers, they have no honor and have sold their soul to the devil. And it's ironic to note that a lot of Politicians are lawyers, no wonder why their is so much criminal activity in Congress it is their very nature to be deceptive and prostitute themselves for money.
The "lawyer", Scott fenstermaker (lower case intentional throughout) is an embarrassment to the US Air Force and particularly the USAF Academy! The only difference between a lawyer and liar is the spelling. I DISAGREE with Bill O' on one point: Calling Scott a weasel denigrates a noble animal that did nothing to deserve such denigration. Scott, may you burn in Hell!
I Totally agree. What a smart ass of a person this lawyer is. I wish he was in the towers that fell. Too bad he is alive to show us his smirk. May he rot in hell.
The people that hate him hate the rule of law??? What a piece of shit! These pigs don't deserve to be tried in civilian court...he makes them sound like a bunch of punks instead of terrorists!
My favorite word to describe an asshole applies to this lawyer. . . .so nasty it can't be stated. This lawyer has no balls. . .a jerk-off. .
In his defense, he's like a politician because he will sacrifice his integrity to save his job.
There isn't enough that can be said about the damage people like this have done to the USA.
To answer Brezable's comment about "rights" The radical extremists are not citizens and have no rights and are not subject to the USA constitution. Holder F'up
This is terrible, honestly, I cannot believe that this defense lawyer even believes what he's saying!
Wow... why the hell are terrorists being given the same rights as civilians? If the 9-11 terrorists do not get sentenced to death, I will be disgusted.
Would you wan't to defend the 9/11 conspirators? Let me guess, you are a bleeding heart sissy liberal who would treat those who threaten to kill the same as good spirted people.
@winjaxer Yup...Of AMERICANS who DO deserve the best possible defense THEIR legal system can provide. Any POG who would represent these animals DOES deserve all the disgust they have brought upon themselves. That INCLUDES Barry and his anti American minions. Despicable, corrupt, garbage, the whole lot of them.
this guy could have just been honest about why he is defending scum. "Im just doing my job" keep it as a job and nothing personal. But, he made a huge error and now tons of people including myself dislike this bastard lawyer.
@sirpigg I don't understand how you or anyone in this thread could be upset at this guy. Anyone calling him scum has serious problems with their understanding of the US Constitution and judicial system. NOT TO MENTION it was the US GOVERNMENT that orchestrated both 9/11 AND the *CREATION* and *MAINTENANCE* of Al Qaeda itself!
Here is what is scary about this trial, if they are convicted it sets a legal precedent that a suspect can be held with out charge for long periods of time, and interrogated with having been meradized. For those who commented on the Nazi's Nuramburg was a military tribual, not a civilian trial.
Im against holding prisoners indefinitely without some sort of justice... im not "totally" against a tribunal, if these men are allowed a trial from that form of justice then im for it.
Tribunal or Civilian court, someone has to defend him. the difference is, in a Civilian court no one was "ordered" to defend him.
Look what im saying is, you cant attack this guy for doing a job someone that has to do, thats not right and you know it.
Finally look at this guy, its obviouse that he knows his people are guilty.. however, he is not going to let this totally undermine his trial and say to the faces of millions that "yeah its a crapshoot".
Goddamn thats not fair at all, i will concede this again.. the man is either brave or utterely incompetant... what did he think billdo was going to ask him.... what he had for breakfast?
the fact that these guys are going to have lawyers and constitutional rights is the scariest fucking thing ive ever seen in my life time. can you imagine if marines picked up bin laden and told him he had the right to remain silent? this is LUNACY!!! the fucking revolution is coming.
And if he was tried in a tribunal... he would still need a defence...
It takes courage to defend someone that is guilty before he stepped into any courthouse. That is why Law is not governmend by emotion..
Even the Nazi generals and politicians who were responsible for deaths thousands of times greater than these terrorists were allowed some sort of trial...
He's not a weasel. That's an insult to weasels. He's a piece of shit just like the administration that is allowing this, no, FORCING this to happen. It is a push by Obama and his Obamanoids to put America on trial. 2012 can not get here fast enough. ANYONE would be a better choice as President than Osama Obama.
No I have simply observed what is going on, something obviously you haven't. You think that you understand what is going on but you don't. You represent the "small mindedness" that breeds a society that WANTS government control on every aspect of your life. Likely because you're to lazy to live your own life or take responsibility for your own actions. Your ilk (like all liberals) wants to blame everyone else. Open your eyes.
ya you observed 2012 and all the presidents that have not been in office. so observant. ic you like to assume alot about others tho. please bro. get over yourself. your nothing special. and not even close on discribeing me. for example i dont want goverment control on every aspect (exaggerate much?) nor do i blame everyone else (kinda sounds like what your doing now). so please be quite. you prove how dumb/fearful some Americans can be that seems like they will do anything to make obama look bad
@Nupiyo Wow what a baby. First I'm not your "bro" punk. 2nd I observe that you are a robot regurgitating the party line. And 3rd I will not be fucking "quiet" (this is how it's spelled...try using spell check dumbshit). Obama is a douchebag who makes himself look bad and is spending this country into oblivion. Try reading a newspaper instead of sleeping under it asshole. You "describe" (note the spelling) yourself perfectly. A mouthy punk. Piss off.
someone is mad hehe. as for regurgitating party lines maybe i am. i just look at what someone says and go off that. if it sounds dumb or childish it just sounds that way. dont matter what party your with. also as for the spelling i don't care that much about internet (unlike you it seems) to make sure everything is spelled right and grammar right. you knew what i mean. so stop crying about it. nothing but childish insults. that's why people don't take people like u serious.
o and i thought i would point out that "quiet" was spelled right just the wrong word. if you dont understand that then how is this "quite" is a word retard just not the right one for that spot. sorry about that. get over it. and "describe" was spelled wrong. but like i said i don't care enough about internet to go over EVERYTHING i wright to make sure its right. i try to skim it. so ya i missed that. get over it. try to say something smart and not childish insults that are not even good insults.
@Nupiyo Keep going punk...you'll pop a gasket soon. I could care less if people take me serious or not. You are the one having a cow because I am exercising my right to free speech. Something liberals rail about...as long as you agree with what THEY say. As for spelling and grammar it denotes some level of intelligence...something you are lacking. Me mad. Nope, you aren't worth the time to get mad at child..and you are a child. Go wipe your nose now.
i have meet enough people in my life to know your the kind that will tell yourself whatever makes you sleep better at night and anyone who disagrees with you is dumb. you will also try to use anything someone says to insult them. so its pointless to continue. as long as you know people don't take you serious with the way you talk that's fine with me. i need to read a book and you need to grow up. guess we both got somthing to work on. and dont get so upset over what people say on the internet.
@Nupiyo I've "met" (note the spelling and use of the word) a lot of people in my life as well. I have always valued a persons ability to speak their mind and I welcome it. I do not consider anyone who disagrees with me dumb at all...if they can present an actual argument...which you failed to do. Speaking and writing intelligently should both be practiced equally..where ever you do it. And I sleep just fine regardless of whether you agree with me or not.
@Nupiyo If you don't care about the internet, why are you here? And it's spelled "write." They also have this thing called a dictionary. It's a book with words in it showing the correct way to spell them and their meanings. Try reading one. Jeez another product of the modern school system.
@Nupiyo No you used the wrong word in the wrong place idiot. Ahh liberal rationalization at it's best. Let me guess you smoked but you didn't inhale. Define what the word "is" really is. Tragic.
that's what i said. and your on my case for reading. and i also said i don't care about spelling right on the internet. again learn to read yourself. and i agree about spelling and grammar. if it was in school or work. you know a place that ACTUALLY matters. if you understand what i say that's good enough. and again you say i am upset when your the one swearing and insulting up and down. ok sure. you seem to be good at telling yourself whatever makes you feel better. next post will be last one.
He he he. That's almost amusing coming from your part of the world. You're another drone of the controlling media, regardless of what country you live in. Pull your head out of the sand and look around with your own eyes for a change.
If this is what is in store for the United States as this trial goes forward... if this is the kind of garbage we're going to have to sit through... this lawyerly BS... this sniveling pathetic attempt to parse words and blame the USA for the 9/11 attacks... to not being able to say what the word "bad" means... this is going to lead to civil unrest and riots if this is the way that "trial" is going to proceed.
What a crock of shit. I can't believe this is happening. God help us all.
This guy is a defence lawyer... forget the fact that he is defending terrorist... lets assume he is defending a fucking teenage pick-pocketer... and happend to be asked by the media whether his defendent is "innocent" and he said "No"... what the fuck kind of defence would that be.
The man doesnt say whether his clients are innocent or not... his biggest mistake was showing up on this stupid show to begin with.
no man or woman alive with any sense of decency would agree to defend an international, islamo-facist, war criminal in a civilian court. you do realize what this means dont you?
to all af yas that comment this vedio serch for loose chane 9/11 and ya will see that there were no terrorist it whats the fucking goverment the fucking u.s. goverment and the 1993 boming of the towere one the goverment the c.i.a the f.b.i the play the shit out of some guy named ramzi ahmed yousef
TheLucya789 1 year ago
"youre in deep trouble" what the fuck is bill talking about..
Chslosers 1 year ago
Does absolutely anyone else out there see that there is a ridiculously huge difference between giving someone who allegedly did not pay their taxes a "fair" trial and giving animals from another country who openly admit that they want Americans extinct, a "fair" trial.....
Sideswept69 1 year ago
@Sideswept69 no.. everyone deserves a fair trial .. that's mob rule and lawless if you say well some people can get a fair trial..
Chslosers 1 year ago
you can't really criticize Scott because his analysis is completely objective. he honestly chooses not to use opinions, and only rely on facts he has seen. this is the way he was been instructed to think in law school.
NORTHERNKONFLIKT 1 year ago
"uhhh bad? I don't know what 'bad' means"
"you don't know what bad means?"
lololollol
NORTHERNKONFLIKT 1 year ago
People might think that this guy is professional and just doing his job and things like that,but no jury in this world, no matter what their verdict is, would change the fact the these terrorists murdered thousands of innocent lives. The point here is..I mean.I would quit my job if it calls for me to defend murdering terrorists, no matter how big the money is.rather than be a cowardly SOB and hide behind "being professional".no decent human being would.wasn't that what made America so great ??
robertfox1975 1 year ago
All of the people calling the attorney here a criminal or whatever are completley *clueless* not only about the United States Constitution and justice system but also that the US GOVERNMENT orchestrated not only 9/11 itself but also the creation and *maintenance* of Al Qaeda!
Seriously the fluoride must be working.
ldleworker 1 year ago
I want this guy to be my lawyer. Very profesional.
knowthetruth1492 1 year ago
people do deserve a fair trial, but why take them back to NYC? its just calling for another attack. that lawyer has some balls to be able to walk around in public...or maby he's just a complete idiot. i say fuck the death penalty, let them rot in a prison of some kind. death penalty is too easy of an escape for what they did...
sumSOTY 2 years ago
Billo "I say that's weasely"
Lawyer "Okay, thank you." lol
dh234 2 years ago
took a lot of balls to do what he is doing. he never said what the terrorists did was right, just that they, like anyone else, deserve a fair trial.
6503mike 2 years ago
The real weasel is Obama granting these terrorists rights and snuggling up to Islamic governments as much as he can. But that's what you get for voting the son of a Muslim into office.
missjo797 2 years ago
Do any of you honestly believe the lawyer actually wants too see these men acquitted? They are entitled to a fair trial by the Constitution and that is what he is trying to give them. These terrorists are scum but nonetheless were tortured by our own security forces. We have stooped down to their level in our methods and that is wrong, according to the 8th amendment. They deserve a fair trial. It's what makes America, America and the rules are what makes us better. Attacking this man is idiotic.
imbored48375 2 years ago 2
@imbored48375 They are war criminals - they, the Muslim terrorists would say so themselves; warriors for Islam, jihad etc. As such they shouldn't be recieving an American trial at all, and should be judged in a military court, and not be given rights that should be exclusive to Americans.
missjo797 2 years ago
I completely agree with you. I thought they had already been found guilty in military court? Correct me, if I'm wrong. This whole civilian court business is all a show. However because we are already beginning this process I was just trying to say that they do deserve a fair trial, regardless of who they are. That is what makes America so great.
imbored48375 2 years ago
This Lawyer is a WEASEL!
Hardliner1269 2 years ago
I do not believe that the terrorists will (or should) go free but...
"Justification" for the murder of thousands of innocent people is something that the US has been doing - its called "fighting terror with terror". Sound familiar?
lost2darkness 2 years ago
weazel, whoosy, we trained this jerk..needs a severe wakeup call
t28cdkmk 2 years ago
Hopefully, the death penalty will be the electric chair, and this piece of shit lawyer (a reduntant term) can sit in one of their laps.
Rot in hell, scumbag.
raypowersmusic 2 years ago
I say at the next terrorist attack that there is we should put this motherfucker lawyer in the attack and let the jurors decide if he was murdered or not. This fuck nut lawyer is a perfect example of a wasted life. He kept saying that he is honored that he is going to represent these garbage men who killed thousands of people......what a low life piece of shit he is!!
matrix3000k 2 years ago
Comment removed
macspud28 2 years ago
I don't disagree with you at all about America killing people which is why these terrorists hate America among other things. But the question to this fuck nut lawyer was clear as it could be and he just played around the question like a little bitch he is and could not give a stright answer.....Just like all fucked up liberals do anyways. Put the politics, law and other BS aside and answer the fucking question. Was it Murder??? HELL FUCKING YEAH IT WAS!!!!
matrix3000k 2 years ago
@matrix3000k he is asking if there is any justification for killing thousands of people, well your government thinks there's justification to kill hundreds of thousands of people. He's stupid even asking these questions. As for a military tribunal if that was justified then surely it couldn't be murder. The interviewer is an ass.
macspud28 2 years ago
Ok so he asked the question and the lawyer still played around the question and could not give a stright answer. Its like if I ask you "would you like cheese on your burger"? and you give me an answer I love cheese on my chicken sandwhich. But thats not my question in the first place. Sound like to me the lawyer is more of an ass than the interviewer! but if that your opinion and you are entitled to it and thats fine as well
matrix3000k 2 years ago
@matrix3000k Think what you like. It's not the worst thing thats happened recently, only it happened in your back yard.
The interviewer is an ASS!!!
macspud28 2 years ago
@matrix3000k Lets see how we the "civilised" west handle things once this financial rollercoaster is over and we're all bankrupted.
Then the terror will really start!!
GOD save us all
macspud28 2 years ago
Scott Fenstermaker is complete fool and a lowlife. Anybody who cannot give a straight answer to the questions he was asked is nothing more than an accessory to the murders those terrorists committed.
vpassenheim 2 years ago 2
You poor yokels who support discrimination against terrorists are fools. Please don't misunderstand me, though. The idea of terrorism, to me, is repugnant. However AS HUMAN BEING WHO HAVE INALIENABLE NATURAL RIGHTS, they are allowed their trial. If it's an open-and-shut case, then there you have it. They'll go to prison anyway, no one is worse for the wear.
My issue is the 9/11 high horse the government and MSM (notably FOX) ride on, even though it's OBVIOUS the 9/11 story was a fraud.
MrEpicTruth 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Bill O'Riley, let someone talk for once and actually have some intelligent comments.
You talk like a complete idiot with no education and that's why millions of americans support you.
All you have to say is "Kill the terrorists" and than you have supporters
GAMETIME453 2 years ago
Maybe try to see both sides of the situation for once.
American deaths: 3000
Iraq Deaths: over 100,000
Do you all know the amount of rapes, murders, and crimes that happen every second from our own people.
It's certainly more than 3000.
AND DO ANY OF YOU ACTUALLY THINK THE TERRORISTS ARE GONNA WIN
GAMETIME453 2 years ago
Iraq deaths + middle east deaths since 2003 are WELL over 1,000,000 buddy.
MrEpicTruth 2 years ago
Really, i had no Clue!!
I was just trying to give a number to make a point. And i'm not referring to 2003 to present, just 2003 deaths caused by U.S. military attacks
But hey i think 9/11 was a conpiracy we uses to unite americans to support a government's war.
The US did it many times in the past. Just like when we sailed a US ship into german territory.Got it attacked.And used it to start a war with Germany.
Sorry if i sound like i'm attacking the US im just trying to change people's minds
GAMETIME453 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
You all are all idiots. Because on TV you all saw the word terrorist and then some newscaster saying Muslim, and now suddenly all Muslims are terrorists.
Complete stupidity.
I bet everyone's gonna say im a terrorist now for defending them, even though im not defending them im just insulting you all
GAMETIME453 2 years ago
Our second president John Adams defended in civil court some of the soldiers that were in the Boston Massacre
TromboneUSAlabama 2 years ago
Yes but Adam's defense was that those men were about to be hurt by the mob and they only did what they did because they needed to protect themselves. And self defense is what any rational person would do.
That does not compare to killing ~3,000 innocent people who were not harming you in any way, shape, or form.
The John Adams defense does not fit with these terrorists.
goingalt 2 years ago
I hate most lawyers, they have no honor and have sold their soul to the devil. And it's ironic to note that a lot of Politicians are lawyers, no wonder why their is so much criminal activity in Congress it is their very nature to be deceptive and prostitute themselves for money.
harryflocyberman 2 years ago
The "lawyer", Scott fenstermaker (lower case intentional throughout) is an embarrassment to the US Air Force and particularly the USAF Academy! The only difference between a lawyer and liar is the spelling. I DISAGREE with Bill O' on one point: Calling Scott a weasel denigrates a noble animal that did nothing to deserve such denigration. Scott, may you burn in Hell!
prcacowboy82401 2 years ago 4
We should send this bastard lawyer to practice his criminal rule of law in Iran.
We have seen thousands of Innocent American Murdered by the Bastard Muslim Terrorists.
It's time to expel out of our Republic the S.o.B. Muslims Murders!
RobertRobls 2 years ago
I Totally agree. What a smart ass of a person this lawyer is. I wish he was in the towers that fell. Too bad he is alive to show us his smirk. May he rot in hell.
eshejh 2 years ago 3
The people that hate him hate the rule of law??? What a piece of shit! These pigs don't deserve to be tried in civilian court...he makes them sound like a bunch of punks instead of terrorists!
1Invayne 2 years ago 2
ASSHOLE LAWYER_ PERSONIFIED~
How many NewYorkers are going to die because of him!
IMPEACH HOLDER! IF THAT DOESN'T WORK?
IMPEACH OBAMA!
mmarabians 2 years ago 2
My favorite word to describe an asshole applies to this lawyer. . . .so nasty it can't be stated. This lawyer has no balls. . .a jerk-off. .
In his defense, he's like a politician because he will sacrifice his integrity to save his job.
There isn't enough that can be said about the damage people like this have done to the USA.
To answer Brezable's comment about "rights" The radical extremists are not citizens and have no rights and are not subject to the USA constitution. Holder F'up
ballarini 2 years ago
Gotta love political correctness.
dmgcolorado556 2 years ago
This is terrible, honestly, I cannot believe that this defense lawyer even believes what he's saying!
Wow... why the hell are terrorists being given the same rights as civilians? If the 9-11 terrorists do not get sentenced to death, I will be disgusted.
Best wishes from the UK.
Vidcar1 2 years ago 2
There has to be some yet undiscovered genetic marker to make someone as disgusting as this attorney.
mfarmer1 2 years ago 2
LOL !!
GospodinMilan 2 years ago
Anybody wonder why lawyers are among the most despised people in the world?
This case does not belong in NYC! It will be a disaster. This should be done in military court where it belongs.
Epidrake 2 years ago 6
wow that guys a pussy, who would just take that from another grown man, its embarrassing
FollowTheReaper93 2 years ago 2
What a douche. Who cares if there were "less than 3,000"? Also, obviously you're not part of the jury... just answer the fucking question!
Rocoluke27 2 years ago 2
What a tool this guy is. Hopefully they lop off his head like they did to the other infidels they don't agree with.
pfavlomba 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
I dont get it.
The lawyer upholds the constitution, bill O faggot doesnt (wouldnt) in this case.
The lawyer does the "patriotic" thing you so called conservofaggots should love that.
Seems like petty emotions triomphe over the love for the constitution and what america stands for.
Brezable 2 years ago
Comment removed
winjaxer 2 years ago
have you ever considerd killing your self if not why not
Bigtony3868 2 years ago
Would you wan't to defend the 9/11 conspirators? Let me guess, you are a bleeding heart sissy liberal who would treat those who threaten to kill the same as good spirted people.
colonelsanders132 2 years ago
Comment removed
winjaxer 2 years ago
That's why lawyers are crooks. They defend the very garbage that inhabits this earth.
Omega1874 2 years ago
@winjaxer Yup...Of AMERICANS who DO deserve the best possible defense THEIR legal system can provide. Any POG who would represent these animals DOES deserve all the disgust they have brought upon themselves. That INCLUDES Barry and his anti American minions. Despicable, corrupt, garbage, the whole lot of them.
ThisAmerican1 2 years ago
this guy could have just been honest about why he is defending scum. "Im just doing my job" keep it as a job and nothing personal. But, he made a huge error and now tons of people including myself dislike this bastard lawyer.
sirpigg 2 years ago 9
@sirpigg I don't understand how you or anyone in this thread could be upset at this guy. Anyone calling him scum has serious problems with their understanding of the US Constitution and judicial system. NOT TO MENTION it was the US GOVERNMENT that orchestrated both 9/11 AND the *CREATION* and *MAINTENANCE* of Al Qaeda itself!
Seriously the fluoride must be working.
ldleworker 1 year ago
This is a Slick Mouthpiece piece of Shit. Does he look like a Jew Boy?
508307 2 years ago 5
"The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants." -- Thomas Jefferson
Johnnnnyyyyy 2 years ago
WHAT AN ASSHOLE
chatog3030 2 years ago
Here is what is scary about this trial, if they are convicted it sets a legal precedent that a suspect can be held with out charge for long periods of time, and interrogated with having been meradized. For those who commented on the Nazi's Nuramburg was a military tribual, not a civilian trial.
Dave19812506 2 years ago
Im against holding prisoners indefinitely without some sort of justice... im not "totally" against a tribunal, if these men are allowed a trial from that form of justice then im for it.
Tribunal or Civilian court, someone has to defend him. the difference is, in a Civilian court no one was "ordered" to defend him.
Look what im saying is, you cant attack this guy for doing a job someone that has to do, thats not right and you know it.
JahobesDaGreatest 2 years ago
Finally look at this guy, its obviouse that he knows his people are guilty.. however, he is not going to let this totally undermine his trial and say to the faces of millions that "yeah its a crapshoot".
Goddamn thats not fair at all, i will concede this again.. the man is either brave or utterely incompetant... what did he think billdo was going to ask him.... what he had for breakfast?
he should never have been on his show.
JahobesDaGreatest 2 years ago
the fact that these guys are going to have lawyers and constitutional rights is the scariest fucking thing ive ever seen in my life time. can you imagine if marines picked up bin laden and told him he had the right to remain silent? this is LUNACY!!! the fucking revolution is coming.
Buyakaasha 2 years ago 4
And if he was tried in a tribunal... he would still need a defence...
It takes courage to defend someone that is guilty before he stepped into any courthouse. That is why Law is not governmend by emotion..
Even the Nazi generals and politicians who were responsible for deaths thousands of times greater than these terrorists were allowed some sort of trial...
Just rememmber that.
JahobesDaGreatest 2 years ago
yep they did, they were tried and exicuted in a MILITARY TRIBUNAL.
Thats the difference.
thatsmrD2you 2 years ago
Somebody must be the defense lawyer, like the Harlem Globetrotters need opponents. It doesn't matter. The Globetrotters always win.
gual123 2 years ago
He's not a weasel. That's an insult to weasels. He's a piece of shit just like the administration that is allowing this, no, FORCING this to happen. It is a push by Obama and his Obamanoids to put America on trial. 2012 can not get here fast enough. ANYONE would be a better choice as President than Osama Obama.
kenporich2006 2 years ago 2
i like how you proved in your own post how small minded you are. thanks for that.
Nupiyo 2 years ago
No I have simply observed what is going on, something obviously you haven't. You think that you understand what is going on but you don't. You represent the "small mindedness" that breeds a society that WANTS government control on every aspect of your life. Likely because you're to lazy to live your own life or take responsibility for your own actions. Your ilk (like all liberals) wants to blame everyone else. Open your eyes.
kenporich2006 2 years ago 2
ya you observed 2012 and all the presidents that have not been in office. so observant. ic you like to assume alot about others tho. please bro. get over yourself. your nothing special. and not even close on discribeing me. for example i dont want goverment control on every aspect (exaggerate much?) nor do i blame everyone else (kinda sounds like what your doing now). so please be quite. you prove how dumb/fearful some Americans can be that seems like they will do anything to make obama look bad
Nupiyo 2 years ago
@Nupiyo Wow what a baby. First I'm not your "bro" punk. 2nd I observe that you are a robot regurgitating the party line. And 3rd I will not be fucking "quiet" (this is how it's spelled...try using spell check dumbshit). Obama is a douchebag who makes himself look bad and is spending this country into oblivion. Try reading a newspaper instead of sleeping under it asshole. You "describe" (note the spelling) yourself perfectly. A mouthy punk. Piss off.
kenporich2006 2 years ago 5
someone is mad hehe. as for regurgitating party lines maybe i am. i just look at what someone says and go off that. if it sounds dumb or childish it just sounds that way. dont matter what party your with. also as for the spelling i don't care that much about internet (unlike you it seems) to make sure everything is spelled right and grammar right. you knew what i mean. so stop crying about it. nothing but childish insults. that's why people don't take people like u serious.
Nupiyo 2 years ago
o and i thought i would point out that "quiet" was spelled right just the wrong word. if you dont understand that then how is this "quite" is a word retard just not the right one for that spot. sorry about that. get over it. and "describe" was spelled wrong. but like i said i don't care enough about internet to go over EVERYTHING i wright to make sure its right. i try to skim it. so ya i missed that. get over it. try to say something smart and not childish insults that are not even good insults.
Nupiyo 2 years ago
@Nupiyo Keep going punk...you'll pop a gasket soon. I could care less if people take me serious or not. You are the one having a cow because I am exercising my right to free speech. Something liberals rail about...as long as you agree with what THEY say. As for spelling and grammar it denotes some level of intelligence...something you are lacking. Me mad. Nope, you aren't worth the time to get mad at child..and you are a child. Go wipe your nose now.
kenporich2006 2 years ago 3
i have meet enough people in my life to know your the kind that will tell yourself whatever makes you sleep better at night and anyone who disagrees with you is dumb. you will also try to use anything someone says to insult them. so its pointless to continue. as long as you know people don't take you serious with the way you talk that's fine with me. i need to read a book and you need to grow up. guess we both got somthing to work on. and dont get so upset over what people say on the internet.
Nupiyo 2 years ago
@Nupiyo I've "met" (note the spelling and use of the word) a lot of people in my life as well. I have always valued a persons ability to speak their mind and I welcome it. I do not consider anyone who disagrees with me dumb at all...if they can present an actual argument...which you failed to do. Speaking and writing intelligently should both be practiced equally..where ever you do it. And I sleep just fine regardless of whether you agree with me or not.
kenporich2006 2 years ago 3
whatever helps you sleep at night. and learn to read. cuz you missed alot.
Nupiyo 2 years ago
@Nupiyo Be sure you read the whole thing.
kenporich2006 2 years ago
@Nupiyo If you don't care about the internet, why are you here? And it's spelled "write." They also have this thing called a dictionary. It's a book with words in it showing the correct way to spell them and their meanings. Try reading one. Jeez another product of the modern school system.
kenporich2006 2 years ago 2
@Nupiyo No you used the wrong word in the wrong place idiot. Ahh liberal rationalization at it's best. Let me guess you smoked but you didn't inhale. Define what the word "is" really is. Tragic.
kenporich2006 2 years ago 2
that's what i said. and your on my case for reading. and i also said i don't care about spelling right on the internet. again learn to read yourself. and i agree about spelling and grammar. if it was in school or work. you know a place that ACTUALLY matters. if you understand what i say that's good enough. and again you say i am upset when your the one swearing and insulting up and down. ok sure. you seem to be good at telling yourself whatever makes you feel better. next post will be last one.
Nupiyo 2 years ago
your the dumbest donkey shit i've seen on the net so far.
bdpride 2 years ago
He he he. That's almost amusing coming from your part of the world. You're another drone of the controlling media, regardless of what country you live in. Pull your head out of the sand and look around with your own eyes for a change.
kenporich2006 2 years ago
If this is what is in store for the United States as this trial goes forward... if this is the kind of garbage we're going to have to sit through... this lawyerly BS... this sniveling pathetic attempt to parse words and blame the USA for the 9/11 attacks... to not being able to say what the word "bad" means... this is going to lead to civil unrest and riots if this is the way that "trial" is going to proceed.
What a crock of shit. I can't believe this is happening. God help us all.
charleslaine 2 years ago
freakiest__interview__evvvver
He's "honored" to be hated ... b/c that means WE hate "the rule of law" ... WTH ????
And this guy is military ... sooo sad
IslandSpiceDreamin 2 years ago
What the fuck people...
This guy is a defence lawyer... forget the fact that he is defending terrorist... lets assume he is defending a fucking teenage pick-pocketer... and happend to be asked by the media whether his defendent is "innocent" and he said "No"... what the fuck kind of defence would that be.
The man doesnt say whether his clients are innocent or not... his biggest mistake was showing up on this stupid show to begin with.
JahobesDaGreatest 2 years ago
no man or woman alive with any sense of decency would agree to defend an international, islamo-facist, war criminal in a civilian court. you do realize what this means dont you?
Buyakaasha 2 years ago
this guy is why people hate lawyers.
thebhoff 2 years ago 2