Is There A Such A Thing as The "Hillary Effect"?

[joeysky18]

Good point. it might prove to be a good theory.

[tomftbll6]

mitt romney is the only person that has the qualifications to run a country.....He was a working exec, turned the Olympics around and straightened them out, straightened out Staples and that alone is the experience the President needs plus being able to say NO and mean it to the Chinese and the Russians or anyone else that would hurt our country....

[spinlandstudios]

I don't know; I think Cenk might be on to something here. There's anecdotal evidence of pollsters showing anti-Hillary bias. Can't prove this, sure, but I'd not dismiss it out of hand. Interesting idea. --Spinny

[TheYoungTurks]

Watch more at theyoungturks dot com.

[glory789]

Hillary won because she cried like a little bitch and Independents voted in the supposedly more competitive Republican race so that hurt Obama big time.

[PrezAlex]

Nah I don't see that. Voting Hillary HAS to be popular, or she wouldn't have been the frontrunner. I think it's odd to say the winner of a hard-fought primary is unpopular.

[chanplaypool]

where are the video starting "we're the young turks"...then pic of hillary and britney spears asking who you'd do? have you forgotten the recipe for success?

dude.

bring back topic of pittbull and the pittbull genocide guy.

[Matty2Tone]

Heh, closet Hillary supporters.

[Jay0808]

LOL

The Republicans are scared shitless of running against Hillary. The Clinton machine doesn't roll over easily and they know it. They've never beaten them you see. They've been shilling for Obama for a very good reason. They know can chew him out later just like they did Kerry.

[glory789]

Obama is far more electable than Hillary Clinton is. Obama can win Independent and even some Republican voters, something Hillary will never be able to do. Especially against McCain.

[Uberbah]

If Hillary really was able to fight the right wing, her negatives wouldn't be so high because she would have fought off their attacks. She hasn't.

[voyzovrezon]

I think they supported Hillary in New Hampshire because the independents wanted her to get the nomination because they know she will lose in the national election. I'm sure some republicans switched their party affiliation to do that too.

[sagaforest]

lolz

[Ender1zero1]

Any Dem is better then the best republican running.

[Wendy62]

YES.

[glory789]

Except for Hitlery

[Ender1zero1]

No exceptions ANY Dem is better then the best republican

[Muaguana]

Come on, man. Are you really that ignorant? The two-party system is a complete joke; basing your judgments of a candidate based on their party and not their policies and what they stand for is just a sign of blatant stupidity.

[Ender1zero1]

In this election I'm sorry party counts, I'm not happy about it bit I will not support any republican for office as long as the neocons are in the power seat in the republican party. I have over the decades always voted issues no matter which party my issue this time around in getting the neocons out of power.

[Muaguana]

Holy crap, are you completely dense? Have you even looked into Ron Paul? The guy is an example of what a REAL conservative is supposed to be. He's a neocon's worst nightmare. Huckabee also has a lot of stances contrary to the neocons, though he's still in the pocket of the corporations. But if you're determined to be narrow-minded and just generalize, then go ahead. Just don't be surprised when your country joins Canada and Mexico to form a North American Union in a few years.

[Ender1zero1]

2 religious nutjobs, if that's the best of the republican party this time around thanks but I will certainly pass on both the creationists.

[Muaguana]

I'm an atheist; I'm as uneasy as you about voting for creationists. Have you heard about the North American Union? Essentially, the US, Canada, and Mexico will be merged in the next few years as one union, similar to the European Union. The Council on Foreign Relations, which published a document called Building a North American Community describing this, has members among the presidential candidates. All of them, save for Ron Paul, are a member of it.

[Muaguana]

Ron Paul is the only one who opposes the formation of it. He also is against the Federal Reserve Bank, is for less government, doesn't accept corporate funds to fund his campaign, and is against the foreign policy of going around blowing shit up in other countries for no reason. He's the only candidate worth a vote. If you value national sovereignty, then he's the only way to go. (I hate to sound like a Ron Paul nutjob, but that's just a fact)

[Ender1zero1]

I am well aware of the North American Union, the CFR and I still have no interest in the republican party at this time and certainly no interest at all in RP his positions or Huckabee.

[Muaguana]

So you're willing to lose your country just because of your bias against Republicans? You don't care about positions or stances, just parties? You're just a typical narrow-minded American fool, completely duped by this two-party farce of a system. You think the parties mean anything? You'll find the stances among many of the Dems and Reps are very similar. The parties don't mean shit. And it's sad to see there are people who think otherwise.

[Ender1zero1]

I know RP's positions I don't happen to agree with them if he ran as a Dem he would not not be on my short list. There are more then 2 parties in the US and if ever there was a election when a good qualified 3rd party candidate stands a chance this is that election. I understand the cult like following RP has developed I even understand why but I'm not interested.

[siogyumolcs]

That's exactly how I felt when everyone attacked her for NOT EVEN crying

Part of me wants Edwards, but..

..part of me REALLY wants ALL the right wing sexist puffy-faced fat southern homophobic christian SUV/pickup drivers and their moronic abused wives to just SHUV IT!

so yea, i kinda want Hillary to win!

[TheYoungTurks]

Watch more at theyoungturks dot com.