I sympathize with your search for inertial propulsion, but this is deffinately an aerodynamic propulsion thing. The rotating cans are interacting with the boundary layer of air and producing lift the same way as a ball thrown with "backspin" does.
Appears to be angular, thus is not propulsive. If it did gain any linear momentum with no angular loss then it is violating conservation laws. Effectively a free energy machine.
@wii810772 I'll put you thumb up for the construction, but may be i don't get the scheme? What's with those cylinders? Are they precessing too? A picture with the forces vectors could really help.
I sympathize with your search for inertial propulsion, but this is deffinately an aerodynamic propulsion thing. The rotating cans are interacting with the boundary layer of air and producing lift the same way as a ball thrown with "backspin" does.
JaycubL 3 months ago
@JaycubL
thanks !
wii810772 3 months ago
Appears to be angular, thus is not propulsive. If it did gain any linear momentum with no angular loss then it is violating conservation laws. Effectively a free energy machine.
repatte 5 months ago
Gyro precession is not antigravity.
TheAsatot 5 months ago
Thank you.
wii810772 5 months ago
@wii810772 I'll put you thumb up for the construction, but may be i don't get the scheme? What's with those cylinders? Are they precessing too? A picture with the forces vectors could really help.
TheAsatot 5 months ago
@TheAsatot P.S. can't get even half of the description due to lack of knowlege of technical English language. My native is Russian.
TheAsatot 5 months ago in playlist Другие видео от пользователя wii810772
@TheAsatot sorry My native is japanese.
wii810772 5 months ago
thanks !
wii810772 10 months ago
no demostrates antigraviti in this video
WARPUNK 11 months ago