Added: 5 years ago
From: only1egg
Views: 26,101
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (131)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Verrry kool !

  • Hi :) could you please tell me about how many volts and amps did you use to get this device rotating? :) Peace

  • If electrogravitics can be proved, who knows what could be done

  • can someone explain what just happened i dont understand :)

  • @envisionstar - He's creating a field of static electricity ions to create a well of anti-gravity; or lift. This also explains how clouds hold billions of tons of water above ground. Some people claim that the USA stealth bomber is ion propelled; and there are many books on this topic. NASA has been working with this for decades.

  • look into gravity emitting diodes

  • thanks

  • Read ELECTROGRAVITCS II, by Thomas Valone, PhD,available at any bookstore, and same for SECRETS OF ANTIGRAIVITY PROPULSION(2008), by PA LaViolette, at any bookstore.

  • Trully is the technology we need to harness for the future.

    do you know any sites that have delailed info on experiments done?

  • google: jlnlabs

  • @nitschke22 try starburstfound. org.

  • It takes a small DC power supply that generates about 15 to 30 thousand volts. I did this years ago just playing around. Imagine the amount of energy that would be required to move a huge craft this way.

  • The larger you make them, the more efficient they are. TT Brown's FLAME JET GENRATOR delivers 15-million Volts DC. Thrust is exponential with increased Voltage.

  • Read Paul A LaViolette's new book: SECRETS OF ANTIGRAVITY PROPULSION. Subquantum Kinetics predicts a positive space charge induces a G-well, and a negative space-charge induces a G-hill. So the device moves inertialessly like a surfboard on a wave as long as the charge is maintained without much leakage. Solid state dielectrics which have a high K-factor, and are masive, increase the force markedly.

  • you nit. they arent being spun, they do the spinning! and the lifting you see is arbitrary and not the point of the demonstration, thats just a centrifugal effect. like spinning a ball on a string round your head

  • The point is this is propulsion WITHOUT MOVING PARTS, with a few Watts of DC-electricity!!!

    Thanks to the late Thomas Townsend Brown; God Bless TT Brown, wherever his immortal-spirit is now.

  • have you ever seen the footage of the bombing at night in Iraq? is it possible that this could be being used on stealth bombers to provide lift over a target? in the vid the plane drops its payload and the enemy only start firing after the bombs have hit, you would think they would here the plane first (before the bombs). you could get to altitude before the target, turn on this device giving you enough thrust and altitude without engines to reach the target COMPLETELY undetected.

  • Yes, the military has electrogravitic weapons delivery systems. TOP SECRET. The nose-cones of ballistic warhead are ELECTRIFIED, like Dudley's electric rockets.

  • Joevioce, the mythbusters are hardly authoritive experts. They also debunked Bedini and his chargers, but I have one charging my RV batteries as I type this.

  • Propulsion System effectiveness in NEWTONS (N)

    Jet engine 2x10^5

    Chemical Fuel Rocket 2.45x10^5

    Arc-Jet engine 1.50x10^-1

    Nuclear Rocket (NERVA) 8.82x10^5

    Biefeld-Brown effect  100

  • Read the paper by the US ARMY:

    FORCE ON AN ASYMMETRIC CAPACITOR, Thomas B. Bahder, Chris Fazi, ARMY RESEARCH LAB, 2800 Powder Mill Road, Adelphi, MD 20783.

  • these dont alter gravity in any way, if they did, then whay dont they work in a vacum?

    because they need air to generate thrust.

    THRUST being the key word here, not gravity conspiracy crap.

  • TT Brown himself performed successful vacuum tests of his flying capacitors at:

    Societe Nationale de Construction Aeronautique in Paris in 1955-56, Agnew H Bahnson Labs, Winston-Salem NC in 1957-58, andat General Electric Space Center (Now Lockheed-Martin Space) in 1959.

  • oob, just go to jlnlabs dot org, and download NASA vacuum-chamber footage. And you are free to d some independent research on your own (but that takes work).

  • I see you have never made one, muck less tested on in a vacuum. Nasa has and they are putting this on satellite's as thrusters.

  • who demonstrated that it doesn't work in vacuum?

  • well, that settles that :D can we put some gas in space then?

  • Ya know, the original Patented design pictures of the craft, by Brown reminds me of the exact UFO space craft pictured in the NASA STS75 tether incident? how about it? come back...

  • Because NASA is using these craft in secret since the 1950s, and or someone from other planets in God's vast universe is interested in our manned Space Program, in case Earth-Humans learn something they are not ready for.

  • Please read:

    POSSIBILITY OF A STRONG COUPLING BETWEEN ELECTRICITY AND GRAVITATION, Takaaki Musha, and by T Musha (2000) THEORETICAL EXPLANATION OF THE BIEFELD-BROWN EFFECT, Electric Spacecraft Journal, 31,29.

  • excellent the best! spot on,

    can you show us how to build them and what you used?

  • Please read SUBQUANTUM-KINETICS, by Dr. PA LaViolette, ETHER-TECHNOLOGY: A RATIONAL APPROACH TO GRAVITY-CONTROL, by Rho Sigma, ELECTROGRAVITICS II, By Thomas Valon, PhD. Then you can make an informed assesment.

  • lifters aren't an example of electrogravatics! OK! there is no such thing as electrogravitcs it is a pseudoscience! get over it!

  • Well you have done the work and are a know it all, we should all listen to what you have to say. You are always right, always remember that!

  • try not to be ignorant:)

  • Try the experiment youself. I am a teacher. I'll show you how, I'm here to help, that is my job.

  • i never said this does NOT work i am simply stating that this machine doesn't manipulate gravity via electromagnetic force.  tell me this so we are on the same page do you say this experiment is a result of manipulating gravity?

  • Gravity is FUNDAMENTALLY electromagnetic. Look at experiments by NIPHER, and IRWIN SAXYL (1927), who demonstrated that force could not be shielded by Faraday-cages. Also look at MOTIONAL ELECTRIC FIELD work by HOOPER (1970s), showing force was gravitic, John Searl's work, Roschin and Godin (1996), Read OUTSIDE THE BOX: Space and Tereestrial Transportation and energy technologies for the 21st Century, Ted Loder, AIAA (2002).

  • you still haven't answered my question. how do you think this device works?

  • ELECTROSTATIC ATTRACTION. The Device, being an asymmetrical-capacitor, focuses electrostatic-potentials like a parabolic-dish, intensifying lines of force. The device therefore sets up an electrostatic WAVE, and the device, lke a surfboard, keeps riding the wave into infinity as long as electrical-charge maintained to electrodes. There, I said it!

  • and this is how you say lifters work, right?

  • I did the experiments with two and three-foot heavy sheet aluminum-copper and plexiglas, before I got into the lower-powered lightweight devices. This is the best theory, and it agrees with works ok Einstein, Burkhard Heim, and theoretical work by LaViolette, and working models by Piggot, Schauberger, Hamel, and others- there are numerous patents on file.

  • Please read ZUR EINHEITLICHTEN FELD-THERIE, von A. Einstien, or Einstein's Unified Field Theory for Gravitation and Electricity in its final form (1927). Its in high-German, but the theoretical math is the universal-language in there. Released with great fanfare to the NY TIMES in 1929. Was the crowning addendum to Relativity at that time.

  • its called ionic wind. just so were on the same page im not some ignorant punk trying to naysay. before i went to college i was totally into this electrogravitics BS but as i progress through my undergraduate physics and electrical engineering courses i (through countless derivations and proofs and yes experiments) become more aware of the true nature of devices such as lifters and the SEG. so before you respond make sure its not your same old elementary BS.

  • You've not done the work, and ignored old and more recent works. I'm sorry, we are not on the same page, never will be. Deal with it.

  • Simply download the NASA video of the succesful vacuum-Chamber work from JLNlabsdotorg. Also vacuum-work fro 50-years ago, AH bahnson labs, of successful vacuum-tests.

  • well, i gave you a thumbs up, these crackpots dont want to liten though.

  • The question becomes, who is the crackpot? I posted titles of papers by the US ARMY, HONDA, NASA, AIAA, etc. whcih proves force is a micro-gravity field (supporting TT Brown's and Serrano's, Hooper, Searl, etc.).

    If you have a counter point, I excpect you as a fellow scientist, to support it with names of papers, mathematical proofs, and companies and institutions that performed theoretical work and experiment, with empirical-data for the theoretical-proofs.

  • the "crackpots" are those on youtube that are criticizing your works, which i must say are BEAUTIFUL! thank you. *****

  • We are fighting against "entrenched-stupidity", so we Earthers can become a star-civilization like all the others that surely populate God's continuum.

  • yeah, because NASA would never lie. Come on, simple thrust test. If the force of air being displaced is more than the weight of the lifter (in verticle test) than its ion wind. If not than it is something else.

  • Have you done the work for 20-years and taken down important numerical data, which is published, and build and fly the largest and most energy-thriffty-such award-winning devices as I have? It takes zero-effort to naysay, when you know nothing about a subject some have spent their lives researching.

  • i haven't done the experiment, but i've done the math and ill tell you this machine isn't puling itself up by its bootstraps. maybe in all of your glorious 20 wasted years of playing around you forgot to test this device in a vacuum? try it and see what will happen. i all ready know from the physics and math of electric field interactions in a cap. again you don't need to wast 20 yrs when you use something called electrodynamics.

  • Many successful acuum test exist. Look them up, and more recent paper this summer at the AIAA by Yutaka Mushii, confirms effect works better in a vacuum.

  • You've NOT done the math.

  • I see a grade school project.... C-

  • Probably a Luddite.

  • like you could make one.. sad

  • and for that reason, i will no longer speak with you.

    type what you want, it will only further justify what i say. and if anyone else wants to read this bullshit, read the previous posts. HE LOSES EVERY ARGUMENT.

    goodbye.

  • hypnotekk, if your point is to argue, maybe you try that on one of the political channels.

  • Maybe when you feel mature enough to contemplate real-world applications such as field emission electric propulsion, or pulsed inductive thrust, then we can chat. i have plenty experience in these areas (working for BAe),and i know EQUATIONS for all of them. IT IS NOT ALIENS.OR CHAKRAS OR FAIRYS! It is NEWTONIAN! you bring the subject into disrepute by associating pseudo-science with actual science.

  • Google: PROJECT OUTGROWTH. I will not keep going round in circles, I am too busy.

  • I have belief in many things,maybe even including chakras etc. but as i have said, u let your dogmatism interfere with your objectivity. the more you talk about chakras in the the same sentence as Electrohydrodynamics, the more of a hippy, and a fool you look. use you eyes and brain for science, and your heart for the rest.

  • It's all connected. All the same stuff, is what I stress onmy DVDs. I was the one who buckled down and replicated the Large 3-foot heavy-aluminum saucers tests! My work since 1990 speaks for itself, along with the results of my research. Why do you think Beamships are the largest such devices in the world, and use far less power than any such devices in history? Thank Thomas Townsend Brown!

  • Wake up people! the BEAMSHIP is just an ionic lifter. not a very good one either.

    tell me captain (haha), what is the electrical to mechanical conversion efficiency of that high school science experiment you call a "beamship"? Anywhere near 10% No. What you are doing isnt groundbreaking. The flow of ions near charged objects has been noted since 1709 (F.Hauksbee). Even Farraday noticed it.

    It IS pure ,earthly physics. It can be measured, it is quantifiable.

  • Not a very good one. Right. Look at the full-power (only 60-Watts, 40kV @ 1.5 mA) Beamship Variation III lift off (the SIX-footer), and the 5-footer, Beamship Variation V flying indoors and out in the fresh-air. Try building one, then you will be qualified to sugest improvements or trash it altogether. TRY IT!

  • Why won't you name yourself, and accept credit for your work? Does the idea of an engineer reading your work worry you? don't answer that, i know what your response will be. i thought we had reached an understanding on the other post, but it seems that you are equally as dogmatic about UFO's being alien as the "proper" scientists are about UFO's being manmade. you say i should think outside the box, but you are as rigid and unflexible as any chemist or engineer i have ever met.

  • I make no apologies. But, in kindness, GOOGLE: Beamship: A RE WORKING OF EARLY 20th.... or Beamship Variation III, and that will tell you who I am. My work has been world famous for eight years or more!

  • I have had an Electrical Engineer with a degree from RPI working with me for 17-years. Works as a payload specialist for Lockeed Martin for 12-years. We share the SAME knowlege, have done all the experiments together, and we know truth about UFOs, saucers, flying toroids,weird science. A closed mind is a wonderful thing to lose. UFOs come from Earth and anywhere in spacetime, other dimensions, other galaxies, othr universes. Barycentric control is just so much more advanced than arcane rocketry.

  • erm, yeah. "A closed mind is a wonderful thing to lose."

    What does that mean? I never said that I dont consider the (massive) probability that these things are extraterestrial. I just havent seen the proof.

    Like i said, "you're belief system influences your science, therefore, you have lost objectivity."

    You are just another dogmatic priest. As dogmatic as the non-believers.

    You preach open mindedness, which i find amusing, and sadly ironic.

  • When I first heard my parents talking about UFOs in the 60's I too was skeptic, until researching UFOs in the late 1960s. The arguments against ETH (Extra-Terrestrial Hypothesis) all melt away under the EVIDENCE. The supposed light-barrier offered as proof that aliens exist,but can't get here. That's like saying we can't go to moon, because we don't have sailboats that travel in space! Technological progress is made by inventing NEW systems, not improving OLD ones. Rocketry is dead!

  • Beamshipcaptain, I saw this video that you can put voltage through a 30 gauge copper wire at 250 turns ( I believe AC ) and it will levitate. The guy also said you can play with the frequency and voltage to get different results. Any comments on that? I ask you due to your qualifications. I'm sincerely interested, thanks.

  • He stated that when placed on Aluminium-sheet, it levitated. That is simple diamagnetic levitation. The AC field in the coil produces mirror-image EDDY-CURRENTS in the aluminum, which repls the coil. This is the principle behind germany and Japan's Mag-lev trans that fly over aluminum-track at 300mph. Also enables SEG-"runners" to "float" over the "plates", as they arbit and rotate, like little "N"-machines, each roller a little generator in itself.

  • Thanks for your reply. The video I am referring to is not this one. It's something I searched by: UFO Propulsion. It was really interesting, the guy took 30 gauge wire and made a circle with 250 turns, he seemed to plug it in to a standard wall outlet and the thing levitated. The YouTube video is named "Ufo technology."

  • Check it out if you will and let me know if this is a hoax or not. Sure seems real, but then again, there are some tricky people out there. Thanks for your time on this.

  • Then That is a "Clarke-Coil" a levitating coil designed by Richard LeFors Clarke, PhD (Google him). Levitating toroids are deplyed by Dept. Of Naval Intelligence, and people along the Gulf coast have been seeing and camcordering these things that look like huge hovering trashcans right from the beach. I'll look for the video, but sounds like a Clarke-coil. Electromagentism is THOUSANDS of times more powerful than gravity, so making things that fly with simple force-fields is EASY.

  • Thanks man, you've been a big help. This stuff interests me greatly. I got in the wrong area of work, I should of went into science. Thanks again.

  • Not too late. You will start really freaking out when you see how much REALLY freaky and cool stuff thre is out there. Like the MYSTERY SPOT, in Santa Cruz, CA. Freaky UFOs being seen on a regular basis in Lake-Tahoe, Capitola CA. We are in the midst of a WORLDWIDE UFO-WAVE, GREATER than 1967 (when I was six). And peopleare getting it on film. We are building up to SOMETHING... !

  • I don't know much about UFOs, but I have watched quite a few videos on them. Something interesting I saw was the Aztec calendar and its prediction that us as humans had recently evolved into a higher state of mind. I guess our interpretation is the Internet came about, in which they predicted as "Global communication."

  • I thought about this, and it is really amazing. The fact that you and I are communicating ideas although we have never met.  Communication will grow over the years, and our ideas will not be conventional in nature. You have enriched my mind will some of your knowledge in Antigravity, and I in turn will pass it along and experiment in my time.

  • It's a very exciting time we live in...hopefully, we all can put our minds together and free ourselves of oil dependence which I know the government will hate. Maybe the UFOs and aliens are monitoring our progress, if not making sure we do things correctly and not blow ourselves up :) Since you told me about this phenomenon, I have read a lot about it and I'm ready for more freakiness.

  • I've always believed in UFOs, because it seems mathematically correct...we are not the only higher thinking organisms out there. The Universe is too big for that; people look at me like I've lost my mind, but who cares. I too think that there is something building up, and maybe we will see this mass visitation soon.

  • You don't know how close to the truth you come. Yes, get ready for some ultra-freakiness, and some really catastrophic weather that will make the 2005-tsunami, and 2005 Katrina look like a FOLKDANCE. I hope I am wrong, but I don't think so... Tectonic and magmatic activity is increasing. I hope I am wrong, but the Cascades are a fuse, and Yellowstone is the powder-keg.

  • Funny you mention Yellowstone...I was just there about a month ago. Lucky nothing happened then :) There is a buzz going around that if Yellowstone did erupt, that it would pretty much take out most of the civilization on the west coast, if not more.

  • You might think me paranoid, but I'm looking to buy land in a rural area due to the international unrest ( BUSH ). Thinking about building a cabin and staying low for a while. I know...weird. I have a sense for things, and the way things are unfolding...I'm running for the hills :)

  • You may be right! We are in the midst of the biggest UFO-wave since 1967, everyone has cameraphones and camcorders, so some amazing video is surfacing. Technology of today makes it much easier to obtain EVIDENCE. Golden Age is coming, but its going to get MUCH worse before gets better. Watch out for tectonic and magmatic activity, esp. in RING OF FIRE. Cascades are fuse, YELLOWSTONE is powder-keg. And 2011 is a short 3-1/2 years away!

  • 2011. I don't want to be on the surface when it happens. I want to be far out in space, on a station, or a ship, or the moon, in a habitat. And then come back to Earth when things settle down. Anyone else notice how TIME has SPEEDED-UP drastically?

  • Aquarian-age is starting, end of 2011. Signs of it have started all over the world. We are in the midst of a major-UFO-wave, worldwide, the likes of which the World has never before seen.

  • I saw on the new the other day that a 3 year-old has an IQ of 151. I immediately thought of the calendar and 2011. The Aztec said that we will become smarter and more enlightened through each stage of evolution. The calendar end, I think, on 12/21/2011, what do you think will happen then? I have seen other footage of UFOs all over the world, and I gotta tell you, I'm really not that scared, but excited. Hopefully I'm right with my gut feeling.

  • When humands on Earth become SMARTER, we will have LOVE, no more hate, no crime (because stupid people commit crimes) no more war, and free-energy and antigravity will be SHARED with EVERYONE, not just the few big OLD Eropaen Families, and the military-elite, with above-top-secret security clearance. The prophesied Age of Aquarius. Only THEN, will Earth-humanity be ready to have contact with advanced beings from space, because WE will be advanced, too!

  • I studied up on the European families and our Federal Reserve, and you hit that right on the head. The Rothschild and J.P.Morgan families have pretty much enslaved us. I really can't wait for the future and its technologies to come around, we deserve them, not the governments. If I were an alien, I wouldn't visit us now either...probably get shot. Hope you don't mind, but I subscribed to you site. Peace man.

  • Why do you think we have constant WARS? It's a form of population-control. I support the troops, and I feel deeply for the ones that come home maimed, or psychically-damaged or don't come home at all. If they knew the truth, they'd never go into harm's way. Why do you think we have no alien contact except with a few contactees?

  • Incredible! I just read about the "Party Levitation." I'm speechless! Please tell me more, I'm just blown away.  Thanks so much man.

  • Is there a way of making something that substitutes the people around the levatee, instead of having 4 people to do this?  I know I'm asking a lot of questions, but man I'm freaking out.

  • This is simply Generating FORCE using DIPOLES. Works best if you have 2-men and 2-women. I talk about the PARTY LEVITATION in the DVDs that come with my Beamship kits (a real primer on many different types of ANTIGRAVITY). The human-body channels ETEHRIC-FORCE into the 7-energy vortexes CHAKRAS (SPINNING WHEELS in Sanskrit) that run up the center of the human-body. Its ALL the same stuff. Same force that makes the BEAMSHIPS fly (Applied Electrogravitics).

  • Yeah i heard about the B2. have you ever performed this experiment in a vacum yourself? i would like to perform a test myself though im having trouble finding any detailed plans for the construction method.

  • Need to get our vacuum-chamber going, but exactly 50-years ago, 2 miles from me, at GE Space Center at King of Prussia, accross from the mall here in Main line, PA, disc-aerofoils wer lown in a vacuum, and vertical lift designs in air, and in bell jars. NASA has done some good vacuum-chamber work recently, they were funded by Gravitec. Good vacuum-work takes money.

  • I understand that the money factor is generaly the problem with the vacum test, though i have looked into it and i dont believe making a vaccum chamber sufficent for the testing of this will be hard or even expensive. i would give it a price tag of maybe $3-400. It shouldnt even have to be a completely 0 atmospheres, any change in atmophere should show different results to prove or disprove this electrogravity concept. This is something people should know about!

  • After this weekend (TESLA FREE ENERGY DAYS, Philadelphia, Aug 10-12, I plan to get hot on the finishing of the 3-meter IGV, and also fly some more radio-controlled models as it is flying season. But my EE at the lab in Bucks county has chambers, and is acquiring most of the needed apparatus. But only 3 sources in the literature got no force in vacuum. The rest, overwhelming majority, including HONDA in Japan, got more efficient results in vacuum;go figure.

  • Discoid arfoils were flown in 1955 in Paris France at Societe du Construction du Sud Oest, an French govt. run facility, at one billionth of an atmosphere. Performance was markedly better in vacuum, jsut as Takaaki Musha showed at the 2007, July AIAA meeting, from HONDA R & D, Yokohama, Japan.

  • Disc Airfoisl similar to these were electrified, and flew with less than a billionth of an atmosphere, in 1955 in Paris, France, at SOCIETE NATIONALE DE CONSTRUCTION AERONAUTIQUE. They flew faster and more efficiently in vacuum, and current could be reduced to the microAmpere level.

  • and the fact that you started researching UFO's around 1969 implies that i am not the only one who has eaten mushrooms in my life.

    you're belief system influences your science, therefore, you have lost objectivity.

    Your lists mean nothing. you are not a published scientist. unless you can identify yourself, so i might read your work? you point out all these websites, which all have multiple authorship. it is difficult to ascetain who you claim to be.

  • I am a published scientist, whatever that means. Google Beamship Variation III. Google: PROJECT OUTGROWTH. And you will see who I am!

  • Guys, there is a great programme on tonite on THE SCIENCE CHANNEL, on successful free-energy and antigravity researchers and their inventions.June 1st. Check your listing!

  • shouldnt this be utilized to create an ifinite energy source.i honestly know what im looking at.actually i just got a bright idea.nvm ill be in my garage/home depot/radio shack and other stores.i think i just found an infinite powered generator.yes i plain on modifying this to extreme lengths.

  • All right, now that Brown's patented Warp Drive technolgy has come out of deep suppression, let's all roll up our sleeves and get cracking on the STAR TREK future of Peace, Prosperity, happiness,sustainable, carbon-free energy, exploration, discovery, and, LOVE.

  • beside create g force i dont see the point , it got that at the fair take a ride !

  • The point is, this demonstrates how we don't neet fuel, or noise, or consumptinon of Oxygen, or heat-energy to effect propulsion, JUST AS OUR ADVANCED VISITORS FROM SPACE DO. We can go to the stars with such electrogravitics tech. Google: BEAMSHIP VARIATION III. That is my work from five years ago.

  • It is a more advanced form of aerospace transportation thatn rokets,; similar systems can take us to the planets and the very stars. Read: FLIGHT WITHOUT STRESS,STRAIN, OR WEIGHT (Interavia, 1956).

  • Every new Idea starts somewhere , this is where the start is,, In the future we can use this technology to fly to the moon, sun and beyond.

  • and how does two pieces of whatever that is moving in circles provide propulsion? Angular momentum is still the same, as well as the linear moment.

    Is that air propulsion? Sorry the Jet design would be more efficient if so.

  • No, I am sorry, I have done the research and have the published papers to prove it. This form of propulsion is several orders of magnitude more than jet propulsion can account for, according to the US ARMY and NASA. HECTOR SERRANO tested his devices in Vacuum, and so did NASA, and both were granted patents based on that research.

  • what research?

    im guessing u probably cant back that up. do u mean u looked on the internet for a while?

  • Read: ETHER TECHNOLOGY, by Rho Sigma,HOMEMADE LIGHTNING,RA FORD,ELECTOGRAVITICSII,Thomas Valone,SUBQUANTUM KINETICS, by P.LaViolette,GEOMETRODYNAMICS,­J Wheeler, GRAVITATION, by Misner,Thorne,Wheeler 1970,QED-STRANGE THEORY OF LIGHT AND MATTER, R Feynman, GRAVITY AS ZERO-POINT FLUCTUATION DETERMINED STATE,Phys Review, H.Puthoff 1989, MAXWELL'S EQUATIONS EINSTEIN-GRAVITY IN THE PLANCK AETHER MODEL OF A UNIFIED FIELD THEORY, Winterberg 1990,ZNATUFORSCH 45a,pp1102-16.

  • I have researched UFOs since 1969, and antigravity and free-energy since 1982, First lecture on NON-CONVENTIONAL ENERGY and PROPULSION SYSTEMS (TT BRwon, Searl), 1990, International Tesla Society Symposium, Colorado Springs, My paper is in THE JOURNAL of NEW ENRGY (INE),3-foot saucers ELECTROKINETIC APPARATUS you can see a photo of in the book:TURNING THE CORNER:ENERGY SOLUTIONS FOR THE 21st CENTURY, and you can listen to my interview on american antigravity dot com .

  • Guess harder. I started this antigravity research twenty-five years ago. What were you doing a quarter-century ago? My replication of 3-foot diameter heavy aluminum TT Brown saucers in the 1990s, and my Beamships are all over Youtube, largest such devices in the world (publicly). I attended the TT Brown conference here in Philly in 1994, and I was at COFE II, in Washington DC last September. I was a long-standing member of the International Tesla Society.

  • man, i thought we settled this. i said fair enough, but as you still can't give me your name, none of what you say, can be backed up.

    all you're doing is giving me meaningless lists of conferences and non-peer reviewed books.

    you have already told me your qualifications, and i have mentioned mine.

    as for what i was doing 25 years ago? probably exactly the same thing you will be doing in 25 years...staring at the ceiling, drooling, while someone wipes my shitty nappy (diaper).

  • try to fly to the moon...

  • Actually, an ion engine has already been used by NASA to send a probe (Deep Space 1) out to explore a comet. Goto to NASA's website to check it out. It essentially uses the same principles here, ionizing a gas to use it as propulsion.

  • this experiment reflects two ideas... first, replicating T.T. Brown's patent #2949550 for an "Electrokinetic Apparatus" field propulsion technology, and second, to show how this technology may be applied for USAF B-2 propulsion

  • how not interesting is that, what were u trying to do?

  • I replicated TT Brown's ELECTROKINITIC APPARATUS with 3-foot diameter flying saucers in 1999, and presented them live and working at the 2nd antigravity conference in Reno, Nevada in year 2000. Please read my paper on BEAMSHIP TECHNOLOGY, in the JOURNAL OF NEW ENERGY, vol.7,#1, 2003. Work for Peace, and renewable Energy.

  • Pretty close to that wall.

  • you're right... less than an inch clearance. built an experiment slighly too big for my available work space.

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more