Ford built some very shitty trucks in the 90's, personaly i preffer the Chevy/GMC trucks, the 350 hasn't changed since 68? things are bullet proof, and after driving a couple 4.6L tritons into the ground, i decided i would stick with my 97 GM
they made shitty stuff in the late 90s but early 90s were good. my 91 300 will still pull a four place inclosed sled trailer loaded with a 5th sled in the back 80 down the highway and its only a straight 6
heres a question that all the proud chevy boys and girls should think about for a second.......why is it that all the gay ford guys are watching and commenting on chevy videos??
is it because they are secretly jealous of the Z71's and how legendary they are?
or is it because no one dares putting up burnout videos of fords cuz its just gay??
yes, they are jelous, very, very jelous I am the proud owner of a 2003 black single cab Chevy 1500 Z71 5.3 liter with dual flow's on it. ain't a stock 1/2 ton ford out there that can compete with it
ooh wow your damn near 600 horse ford can smoke 35s.... wtf dude?
my 250 horse z71 can smoke 35s and its stock other than the lift and tires
nck550- your an idiot
benchn280- i could take my 330 ft/lbs of torque and pull your ass all over the country, your pos ford needs that extra torque to pull its own ass out of the way
chevy power is in its own class because "real power" is made by pussy trucks
that 3/4 ton 5.4 also has no horsepower, no balls, and sounds like shit with any aftermarket exhaust on it, can hold backpressure worth a shit, thats why all i see in my motor shop is fords that are broken,....
fuck all you little girls and your chevy's. i hav a F-150 with a 580hp ford racing crate engine. I can melt my 35in. mickey tompson's with no brake in 2nd gear. Ya'll can start tlking bout ford's again when ya'lls rust buckets can top that.
i got a 98 chevy 1500 and can lit posi up on any kinda ground so idk what nck550 is talking about your buddies just must not know how to do a burn out
jealous?? lol i know two people who own 1998 1500's with 350's. neither can light their tires up on DRY pavement, which is why this dude had to put water down. my 2000 F-150 5.4 with only 5 more hp stock lit em up without struggle.
they WERE brand new goodyear wrangler silent armour all terrains. my neighbor tried lighting his tires up in his 98 chevy 1500 350 Z71, all it did was hop alot and he stopped, cause he was selling it and didnt want to wreck it.
any vehicle can do a burn out on water, with water on the raod i can easily spin the whole way across the intersection just from stomping it, when its dry they might squeel a little bit. my neighbor even said before he tried lighting them up that he would need to put some oil or water down, at first i didnt think he needed to so he tried and failed.
well, I have done blown up 2 ford motors, and i never drove them hard, and the detonated within 200K miles, whereas my chevy has 180K miles on it, i drive the hell out of it, and it still gets 24 mpg
its all luck buddy i got a 88 5.8 f150 with 271,690 miles on it and all thats gone bad is the starter motor, and i got a chevy 91 2500 150000 with the 350 and its broke 2 rods, just put in the second tranny, and uses oil like theres no tomarrow, so alls im sayin is luck
got a point, but explain the 2 blown up ford engines I had to haul off. A 5.8, that a 351 right? i been thinking of putting one in my 85 F-150 longbed and turning it into a showtruck
no, that's in my '82, my first truck ever, and the most reliable engine I ever had, you combine that with the granny box 4 spd and modified transfer case, and you got one tourquy little truck, as for my 85 (actually my dad's) it has yet another 302, just this one is carburated
you wanna hear something weird? my brother had an '83 F-250, with a 302, and it would pull just fine....... why would they put a 302 in a 3/4 ton? makes about as much sense as GM putting a 4.3 V-6 in a 1/2 ton
the reason for the 4.3 v6 in the 1/2 ton is all about gas milage. at work we have all chevy work trucks most have the 4.3, they are just plane jane work trucks that get good gas milage for cheap running and they last. over half of our chevy trucks have well over 300,000 on them and all we have had to do is general maintenance to them....... those 4.3's do alright in the 1/2 tons. i hooked one on to a semi to pull it in the shop and had to go up a short but steep hill and it handled it well!chevy
4.3 is a good motor. i had a 92 1500 cheyenne 4x4 with it. all the power i needed, but only got like 15 mpg or so. mabey less. had a 36 gal. gas tank. my motor threw a rod at 160k then a different 4.3 rebuilt motor cracked a head, then antifreeze got in the oil and destroyed the bearings, then i put in a 95 4.3 vortec and sold the truck. now i have a 97 1500 gmc sierra slt 4x4 350 vortec.
your not gonna find a 90's chevy and good mpg. when your lookin at the 19-21mpg range, your probably gonna have a 2wd stick shift S10. 18 is probably the best you are gonna see with a full size 4x4 with a v8. dont get a 305. if you get one, get a 350 in it you wont regret it. they have about 250-270 hp depending on the year and plenty of torque. mine gets around 12mpg city but gets 16hwy and can get 18 interstate, @165hp 355lb feet of torque is what it should have with the 3.73 gears.
On the contrary, My 97 suburban with over 200,000 miles, before I upped the idle, got 14 mpg city and 18 highway. I would expect a pickup to do better than that. Now I do about 12/16.
i can stomp my 87 k5 with a 350 through a wet intersection to and it will hit 3rd gear when it gets to the other side and i imagine i can hold it a lot longer but it gets a little crazy on the road, and thats with a locker and 35s
lol the 5.4 could even pull a sick whore off a piss pot let alone out pull a chev nice try bro, u cant even put 2000 lbs on the back of a ford without even makin the back end squat, Fucking Old Recycled Dodge
you must be joking. Look up the torque specs and what rpm its made at. Mine makes 350 ft lbs at 2500 rpms. The mid 90s 350 made about 330 at a higher rpm and the newer 5.3 makes 325 at 4500. torque is what pulls, not horspower. Try pulling a trailor with a 5.4 and then try and pull it with the 5.3. If they have the same rearend ratio you will easily be able to tell which pulls easier. Dont talk smack about things you dont understand.
with that much smoke it doesnt really matter if its wet or dry haha, but yeah i agree when its a shorter burnout. when theres that much smoke all the waters gone lol
yea..z71 dont come with posi..the z71 package is jsut suspension and wheel and tire..im thinking maybe geared a lil lower..not for certain,..i got a 95 swb reg cab z71
Some of the Z71's had locking rears. They had the same G80 diff that all the newer Z71's have after 2003 I believe. If you look in your glove box you will see a list off all the RPO codes printed out. If you see G80, you have the locking diff.
Well I'm pretty sure I do nevertheless, I do burnouts its only dual tires, but I'll check my glove box if I can get past all the shit that's in it lol thanks for the tip
Yay a burn out where both tires are spinning not one stick that in your pipe and smoke it ford.
gitrdonedavid 2 months ago
يلعبون بسياراتهم ويحرقون ام امها
وحنا نشتري من عندهم ونقول نظيييييف امريكي
كلام فاضي
khalid505h 5 months ago
Old chevy puttin on a smoke show
MrSpeeddeamon96 7 months ago
What year is this truck??
REDT4R1 7 months ago
talk about a ROAST SHOW!!
jcampbell52790 10 months ago 3
heres how it goes chevy kills ford and dodges sound good but then blow the trans so just stick with a chevy or somthing GM lol
Brmobrad 1 year ago
POSI
eminem123456789ful 1 year ago
i bet your 10b govlock hates you.
trkklr77 1 year ago
Chevrolet=Enough said! "HEART BEAT OF AMERICA~!"
kenjackson1977 1 year ago
@kenjackson1977 yea "LIKE A ROCK" it just lays there
MUSTANGMAN50LX 1 year ago
@kenjackson1977 thats todays chevy truck!
CoRRisioN2142 1 year ago
Do it on a dry road.
X1danno1 1 year ago
@X1danno1
I have a '93 Sierra with Kelly mud/snow tires, and it'll burn like that on dry pavement.
So don't even go there.
andrewcalder69 1 year ago
@andrewcalder69 I didnt say it wouldnt, but wheres your video?
X1danno1 1 year ago
nice smoke!
14ducksfan 2 years ago
gotta love that vortec
blue97sc2 2 years ago
sick lol i love it
dds07stang 2 years ago
ya i heard that!!!!!!!!!!
motomike350 2 years ago
Ford built some very shitty trucks in the 90's, personaly i preffer the Chevy/GMC trucks, the 350 hasn't changed since 68? things are bullet proof, and after driving a couple 4.6L tritons into the ground, i decided i would stick with my 97 GM
captaincrunch69 2 years ago 3
The 5.4 triton isnt a bad truck but ford did make shitty stuff in the 90s
bowhnterdon 2 years ago
yes they did. their new range of trucks arent bad now, but i have never liked their diesels.
jackmitchell123 2 years ago
they made shitty stuff in the late 90s but early 90s were good. my 91 300 will still pull a four place inclosed sled trailer loaded with a 5th sled in the back 80 down the highway and its only a straight 6
iridecr80 2 years ago
@bowhnterdon 5.4's really don't have much power at all, even the new ones ive riddin in one.
chevyman8329 1 year ago
heres a question that all the proud chevy boys and girls should think about for a second.......why is it that all the gay ford guys are watching and commenting on chevy videos??
is it because they are secretly jealous of the Z71's and how legendary they are?
or is it because no one dares putting up burnout videos of fords cuz its just gay??
randyrhoads1989 2 years ago
yes, they are jelous, very, very jelous I am the proud owner of a 2003 black single cab Chevy 1500 Z71 5.3 liter with dual flow's on it. ain't a stock 1/2 ton ford out there that can compete with it
gawnfishin2day 2 years ago
i have a 2001 myself with the flashpaq put on it and i wouldnt trade it for the world, even if it gave me trouble. long live the bow tie!!
randyrhoads1989 2 years ago 29
Ford is the only one with a circle emblem, THEY CIRCLED THE PROBLEM!!!!!!!!!
ArCtiCzr600RiDeR 2 years ago 2
ooh wow your damn near 600 horse ford can smoke 35s.... wtf dude?
my 250 horse z71 can smoke 35s and its stock other than the lift and tires
nck550- your an idiot
benchn280- i could take my 330 ft/lbs of torque and pull your ass all over the country, your pos ford needs that extra torque to pull its own ass out of the way
chevy power is in its own class because "real power" is made by pussy trucks
96johnnyz71 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
POSI!!!!!!
522viper 2 years ago
I believe its called limited slip....
oreilly335 2 years ago
chevies rape ford up the bung hole
guitargek07 2 years ago 50
ya chevy is gay like that
IHDiesel436 2 years ago
@guitargek07 NO the f650 rapes all others
kalishaROX 1 year ago
watch massive truck burnout
n00bcak35 1 year ago
LOL.. a 5.4 pulls good.....LOL what a jokester.
86godsmack 2 years ago
my 05 F 250 crewcab 5.4 pulls with no problems
IHDiesel436 2 years ago
that 3/4 ton 5.4 also has no horsepower, no balls, and sounds like shit with any aftermarket exhaust on it, can hold backpressure worth a shit, thats why all i see in my motor shop is fords that are broken,....
celinamsu55 2 years ago 2
it had enough balls sounded good enough and had plenty of horse power to pull my goose neck, and it never broke down, I had it 150k before I sold it
IHDiesel436 2 years ago
CHEVYS ARE THA BEST
Unicorn38063 2 years ago
thats a biased opinion
IHDiesel436 2 years ago
fuck all you little girls and your chevy's. i hav a F-150 with a 580hp ford racing crate engine. I can melt my 35in. mickey tompson's with no brake in 2nd gear. Ya'll can start tlking bout ford's again when ya'lls rust buckets can top that.
cfhouseboat 2 years ago
whats the point of putting a racing engine in a truck its so unstable. trucks are for offroading not going from 0-60 in 4 seconds
pepperroni17 2 years ago 3
Thats a good sounding 350
91CTD 2 years ago
CHEVY POWER!!!!!!
92Gearwrench 2 years ago 2
my 98 z71 burns out with cooper stt tires on dry pavement... damn nck550
roosteryaerdme 2 years ago
i got a 98 chevy 1500 and can lit posi up on any kinda ground so idk what nck550 is talking about your buddies just must not know how to do a burn out
krathred98chev 2 years ago
Why a reverse burnout lol?
bonezy09 2 years ago
im a ford guy but im willing to admit that was badass
FordFanatic59 2 years ago
very very proud owner of a bowtie z71, never driven a truck with a 350 with so much balls stock
wannaracesillyricer 3 years ago
thats chevy power-- ford guys are just jealous
98k1500z71 3 years ago
jealous?? lol i know two people who own 1998 1500's with 350's. neither can light their tires up on DRY pavement, which is why this dude had to put water down. my 2000 F-150 5.4 with only 5 more hp stock lit em up without struggle.
nck550 2 years ago
what kinda tires you using? ones with no fucking tread? go fuck urself fagget.
chevy power all day.
Colesusername 2 years ago 4
they WERE brand new goodyear wrangler silent armour all terrains. my neighbor tried lighting his tires up in his 98 chevy 1500 350 Z71, all it did was hop alot and he stopped, cause he was selling it and didnt want to wreck it.
nck550 2 years ago
Really now cause that don't make your lie sound any better
teamlawless17 2 years ago
any vehicle can do a burn out on water, with water on the raod i can easily spin the whole way across the intersection just from stomping it, when its dry they might squeel a little bit. my neighbor even said before he tried lighting them up that he would need to put some oil or water down, at first i didnt think he needed to so he tried and failed.
nck550 2 years ago
They put water on the road so they don't fucking kill the tires you dumb ass...
namelesss0101 2 years ago
FUCK FORDS FUCK F-150s
2pac203 2 years ago 5
thats cuz the 5.4 makes real power. the 350 makes ,as somebody put it, "chevy power" lol
benchn280 2 years ago
Comment removed
gailardiar 2 years ago
mean power huh? Ford motors of equal size mak emore torque.
benchn280 2 years ago
well seeing as thought its not the engine that makes torque.... your a dumbass.
randomstuff125 2 years ago
you obviously no nothing about engines so shut the fuck up and saying chevy engines are the best means your a biased fuck stick
IHDiesel436 2 years ago
well, I have done blown up 2 ford motors, and i never drove them hard, and the detonated within 200K miles, whereas my chevy has 180K miles on it, i drive the hell out of it, and it still gets 24 mpg
gawnfishin2day 2 years ago
its all luck buddy i got a 88 5.8 f150 with 271,690 miles on it and all thats gone bad is the starter motor, and i got a chevy 91 2500 150000 with the 350 and its broke 2 rods, just put in the second tranny, and uses oil like theres no tomarrow, so alls im sayin is luck
IHDiesel436 2 years ago
got a point, but explain the 2 blown up ford engines I had to haul off. A 5.8, that a 351 right? i been thinking of putting one in my 85 F-150 longbed and turning it into a showtruck
gawnfishin2day 2 years ago
idk id have to look at those engines and ya its a 351, it is a good motor, whats in it now a 300 strait six?
IHDiesel436 2 years ago
no, that's in my '82, my first truck ever, and the most reliable engine I ever had, you combine that with the granny box 4 spd and modified transfer case, and you got one tourquy little truck, as for my 85 (actually my dad's) it has yet another 302, just this one is carburated
gawnfishin2day 2 years ago
the six was a great motor as for the 302 i personally think its underpowered for a truck so i would go with a 351 or a 460
IHDiesel436 2 years ago
you wanna hear something weird? my brother had an '83 F-250, with a 302, and it would pull just fine....... why would they put a 302 in a 3/4 ton? makes about as much sense as GM putting a 4.3 V-6 in a 1/2 ton
gawnfishin2day 2 years ago
the 302s weve had and friends have had are gutlass and you could get a 3/4 ton with a 4.3
IHDiesel436 2 years ago
the reason for the 4.3 v6 in the 1/2 ton is all about gas milage. at work we have all chevy work trucks most have the 4.3, they are just plane jane work trucks that get good gas milage for cheap running and they last. over half of our chevy trucks have well over 300,000 on them and all we have had to do is general maintenance to them....... those 4.3's do alright in the 1/2 tons. i hooked one on to a semi to pull it in the shop and had to go up a short but steep hill and it handled it well!chevy
motomike350 2 years ago 5
4.3 is a good motor. i had a 92 1500 cheyenne 4x4 with it. all the power i needed, but only got like 15 mpg or so. mabey less. had a 36 gal. gas tank. my motor threw a rod at 160k then a different 4.3 rebuilt motor cracked a head, then antifreeze got in the oil and destroyed the bearings, then i put in a 95 4.3 vortec and sold the truck. now i have a 97 1500 gmc sierra slt 4x4 350 vortec.
GMCman82 2 years ago
would you say that you get the same mpg with the 350?? cause i wanna get a 90's chevy but want good mpg.
soja4life117 2 years ago
your not gonna find a 90's chevy and good mpg. when your lookin at the 19-21mpg range, your probably gonna have a 2wd stick shift S10. 18 is probably the best you are gonna see with a full size 4x4 with a v8. dont get a 305. if you get one, get a 350 in it you wont regret it. they have about 250-270 hp depending on the year and plenty of torque. mine gets around 12mpg city but gets 16hwy and can get 18 interstate, @165hp 355lb feet of torque is what it should have with the 3.73 gears.
GMCman82 2 years ago
@GMCman82 dude... i have an extended cab 1/2 ton 98 z71 350 fi with 192,000 miles on it and i have always got 17-21mpg, no joke...
DehnMan 1 year ago 2
@GMCman82
On the contrary, My 97 suburban with over 200,000 miles, before I upped the idle, got 14 mpg city and 18 highway. I would expect a pickup to do better than that. Now I do about 12/16.
FFLITMiko 1 year ago
@soja4life117 man i got a 98 z71 its amazing i get roughly 17mgp and it still hauls like a bat outta hell
JahISLANDbwoi 1 year ago
i can stomp my 87 k5 with a 350 through a wet intersection to and it will hit 3rd gear when it gets to the other side and i imagine i can hold it a lot longer but it gets a little crazy on the road, and thats with a locker and 35s
ToxicChevy393 2 years ago
not really, as my 5.4 will pull far more than that pathetic 350 ever could.
benchn280 2 years ago
lol the 5.4 could even pull a sick whore off a piss pot let alone out pull a chev nice try bro, u cant even put 2000 lbs on the back of a ford without even makin the back end squat, Fucking Old Recycled Dodge
kossy87 2 years ago
you must be joking. Look up the torque specs and what rpm its made at. Mine makes 350 ft lbs at 2500 rpms. The mid 90s 350 made about 330 at a higher rpm and the newer 5.3 makes 325 at 4500. torque is what pulls, not horspower. Try pulling a trailor with a 5.4 and then try and pull it with the 5.3. If they have the same rearend ratio you will easily be able to tell which pulls easier. Dont talk smack about things you dont understand.
benchn280 2 years ago
if you had a ford you wouldnt need something to help you burnout
bjadler 3 years ago 2
so true!!
nck550 2 years ago
that wasnt water it was bleech retard and i have the same exact truck and believe me it doesnt need anything to burnout
xkillerbee07x 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Giant
Mountain of
Crap
haha neded water to burn out what a pos
WHOULOOKINAT123 3 years ago
its a burnout competion you retard.they always put water down.
evilempire042 3 years ago
true true
WHOULOOKINAT123 3 years ago
trust me Z71's can do a burnout on drive pavement just fine my 02 with 33 inch mud tires does it with ease and yes its posi
AeroGMC 3 years ago
you wonder why??? well mabe so they dont burn up their tires so bad. z71 are good trucks so dont diss them
700yamahatriple 3 years ago
with that much smoke it doesnt really matter if its wet or dry haha, but yeah i agree when its a shorter burnout. when theres that much smoke all the waters gone lol
submitaweasel 3 years ago
Another Z doing a burnout on wet pavement...wonder why?
wsrracing 3 years ago
yea..z71 dont come with posi..the z71 package is jsut suspension and wheel and tire..im thinking maybe geared a lil lower..not for certain,..i got a 95 swb reg cab z71
89warren90 3 years ago
Most Z71's 96+ came with G80 rear lockers.
meaningintragedy01 3 years ago
beauty
ryderZ28 3 years ago
haha nice running boards! is that my grandpas truck?! but, nice burn too :)
chevydude03 3 years ago
nice, i have this same truck, do you have any mods to your engine? i have exhaust but when i try to do burnouts it'll only spin posi real slow
UncleJohnsonn 3 years ago
the other guys video is better.
Metallica1071991 3 years ago
the one wheel peel :)
sirbuick 3 years ago
thats not one wheel, look at the beginning
redneck64tl 3 years ago
ya dude thats a nice posi burn out right there
chev78406 3 years ago
The Z71's have posi's
JetForceF22 3 years ago
they dont come stock posi, i had to put posi in my z71. all z71 means is that it comes with skid plates and bilstien shocks
skylinedrcrew 3 years ago
My 1995 Z71 has a factory posi rear.
JetForceF22 3 years ago
Some of the Z71's had locking rears. They had the same G80 diff that all the newer Z71's have after 2003 I believe. If you look in your glove box you will see a list off all the RPO codes printed out. If you see G80, you have the locking diff.
jjeckl 3 years ago
Well I'm pretty sure I do nevertheless, I do burnouts its only dual tires, but I'll check my glove box if I can get past all the shit that's in it lol thanks for the tip
JetForceF22 3 years ago
Ever done all four lol
check out my skull crusher
dbzgt545 3 years ago
stock?
lilfootballkid34 3 years ago
wicked burnout.. looks just like my truck lol
browning383 3 years ago