You should seriously consider why he said that-for this is exactly the problem of humanity-They keep seeking endlessly how to USE things,yet...Check for WHAT they are using it all-and the way they use it is eventually for growing bigger/stronger/faster and so on,or just to satisfy their stupid emotional craving,or simply for the goal of Total dominion of everything.
I believe the problem with science resides within the people who explore it-for their goals are empty.
can anyone shed some light on this theory. I'm 15 going into my PHD and iv just learnt that I'm going to be looking into 'string theory'. can anyone that is studying this please simplify it as it is my first day of knowing.
few years ago two parents went out for dinner. A few hours later, the babysitter was calling to see if she could cover up the clown statue in the kids' room, the father said "Get the kids and get out of the house, we'll call the police, we don't have a clown statue". The "clown statue" was actually a killer that escaped from jail. If you don't post this on 10 videos tonight the clown will be in your bed at 3:00am with a chainsaw in his hand
Oh NOVA how do I love thee? Let me count the ways... I love you in the first dimension, I love your image in 2D, 3D you are all around me, 4D you are with me always. ... 5D you are here again, and in 6D you're fucking i dunno I can't wrap my head around you...
A truism of this is that it is irrational to consider fundamental particles as, well, fundamental. Why would scientists having discovered the atom, then the nucleus, then the proton and neutron and then the quark, ever assume that this was the limit. Dogs have small fleas upon their back which do annoy and bite them, and small fleas have lesser fleas, and so on ad infinitum.
@Huttate1 Not really, an infinite series of matryoshka dolls ' ad infinitum' isn't rational. In fact maximum length planes were defined long ago. A plank length is pretty much as small as we believe you can go.
A few minutes into the video I happen to casually glance at the top comment. I read it again as it is interesting. I recognize having seen the name previously somewhere in the video. I think "sh!t, i'll have to go look for it now, and that's going to be difficult to find". I was trying to remember some reference point, for a few seconds while the video is still playing, when the exact part (creepy intro) played at that very moment.
This is why I could Never ever be a physicists. I just couldn't sit in a attic spending hours and hours accomplishing nothing. That would drive me insane.
A lot of them do it for the same reason gamers play games. Even if they know they won't accomplish anything they do it because physics holds their interests.
@Romavolov Well...they already know how to do that...but what kind of equipment would you need to do such a feat? Or if you could xD meditate enough as to change they way the energy that makes the atoms in your body be whatever they are...then you could change your very structure. Wich starts to be more of a philosophical matter because what is exactly that wich makes you a human. For now...i'm only text in a screen for you...for someone else i'm a body living...vibrating. So yeah...
I don't understand how billions of tiny oscillating energy strings could compose particles of solid matter. Also, how can their frequencies determine things like charge? and on that matter, are these strings also subject to the law of duality?
@sgb1223 Everything is vibration. And these strings are what they are interpreting as the vibration. EVERYTHING IS VIBRATION! Einstien said it first... but it has always been so.
This is why we keep Theoretical physicists in some form of laboratory environment, so they get a better grip on reality. they take perfectly fine models such as the quark models and literally tie them up in knots.there's no experimental evidence to prove string theory, it does'nt matter how beautifull or elegant the theory is if it does'nt agree with experiment, its wrong.it gets way too much hype, don't get me wrong i love theoretical physics but this is just too theoretical.
Energy sources without the need for fuel or energy input exist ,But Millions are spend in supressing that information,Check this free energy magnet motor at LT-MAGNET-MOTORdotCOM ,The revolution begins!
@shoshanish do you lack common courtesy? This isnt 2x=1. Its string theory. Without asking questions, how can we progress even further? for every 1*10^99 questions asked, atleast one of them are bound to be a revolutionary one. Imagine how many times these guys with nobel prizes have asked themselves 'stupid' questions. its part of the process!
"god, you like my classmate who doesnt get something until the teacher tells him like 20 times." i'm worried that this bothers you.
@neomerik A. wasnt talking to you, butt the fuck out.
B. shutthefuckup, did you even read all my comments, im just reapeating what was said in the video, if one does not get the video, one shouldnt be trying to watch this stuff.
So, God is a musician - Faithless are right: "God is a DJ" :DDD I wonder if we shrink to the size of strings, how the world will change, and do we really see strings in black space like in animation here, or in white light, or anything else imaginable..
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
I dunno sometimes i think the universe is much more simpler than all this. Extra dimensions and all this blah blah blah. Who's to say time is an actual dimension? Time isn't something you can see or feel. It's something the human mind completely made up. I gues the ultimate question which is what confuses the human mind is if time started....why did it start? And what was before time? Was there time? or nothing at all? and if nothing at all what was it? See where this is getting us...
ah...the never stoping quarrel between idiots and seekers - we are all almost equaly blind to the truth. But...is there a truth? And if there is - can we comprehend it from were we are right now ? One thing for sure...I rather be a seeker of truth rather then an idiot. The movie rocks btw , it was a pleasure to watch :)
@skylineer288 If light is divided by refraction and that is how we see different colors. Is the universe the color of one big white light, but our eyes ( being refractive ?) help us recognize the divisions? I wonder is this what Adam and Eve saw? :)
@italia300 Thank you so very much the other night I was working with some equations and while I was looking for the value of the variable this popped into my head and it drove me crazy that I didn't know the name of it! TY! ^_^
@italia300 yes, yes it is. and considering the fact that a comment about bach is the highest rated on this video, one can make the assumption that those curious about science, math, and philosohy (the big subjects) also enjoy bach's music, therefor suggesting a relation beween the two. i think its safe to say that bach is the music of the intellectual mind.
`Time`..`Beginning`..`End`..`Infinite`...these are all terms created by Man.The fact of the matter is, we don`t yet fully understand the absolute scheme of things...whatever that may be.
Id say its more like it has no center like a fractal, if it doesnt have a center and u say its like a circle then no matter how far I travel in space I will always end up in the place I started, we have to understand that center, start and end are concepts made by us, the same goes for size and others I think.
they are only saying it is the smallest of the small that they currently know of, or have a theory for. and as for the universe being infinite that's not entirely true. the known universe is indeed finite, it's just expanding.
Well that's just the point. Basically, think of the days when man standardized clothing into what's called small, medium, & large sizes to create unifomity among soldiers. Standardized clothing was invented. The same can be said about theories. Scientists go out and search for a 'suit' or theory to best describe or 'fit' what they percieve. In this case reaserchers came back with a suit called string thory- it's just a model that seems to work until a better suit is found.
Relativity was just a model- a model that was incomplete but worked enough to be verified by experimentation. That is the key- Experimentation. Ultimatly if it can't pass the test of experimentation or until then you can consider it to be philosophy or mathematical literature and nothing more! Proof is the ultimate goal throughout science!! Without that it's merely literature.
Ultimately, slowdub, yours is the ultimate infinite loop- the biggest problem in physics- past, present, future!! Ultimately researchers get tired of that and try to force a 'new' theory down everyones throat. They come back with the newest red suit called string thory!! They merely ignore the obvious- if strings are the ultimate fundamental 'particle' then consists of its' building blocks?!!
You don't understand the tautology of your own statement. To say that there is not beginning or end but only time infinite is a total contradiction of your very statement!! Ha,ha, ha!! Sorry, I just find that amusing! I'm sorry your statement is not well thought out and is unfortunately irrelevant.
The simplest answer to your quesiton is that there is 'time' is to also say there is a beginning and end because that is what time is- a beginning and an end. That is the very definition of time itself. If there is no beginning and no end then you are no longer speaking about time!!!!! You are speaking about something which you haven't bothered to define!! I hope that answers you quesiton! It should answer your question because it is a total and complete answer to your question!!!!
Time or the temporal in physics is just a word that describes intervals of change, it has nothing to do with beginning and end. In relativity it's called spacetime they are non-categorically differentiable, one of the effects of which, in the case of time, is non-simultaneity (which *is* evidenced and used in modern technology namely GPS systems) proving "time" or simply the interval of change an object goes through is utterly relative to each respective object's velocity.
I respectfully disagree with you. When someone refers to intervals of "change" this implies a start and a stop, hence beginning and end if for nothing more the 'interval' itself. Additionally, you can refer to spacetime as much as you want which proves nothing except the language relativity refers to in respect with time. Since relativity bar far falls short of being a comprehensible explanation of reality it's use of the concept of time is by far the final word.
I'm aware of the spacetime concept, however I consider this to be a 'fudge' element. A faux pas in physics. It's a seductive concept but I believe it is more of an obstacle to our path of understanding reality than it is a help. Much like Microsoft windows is to computers!!! Lol!! I've said it before, relativity is the MS windows of physics- it works at 'some' level, calculates some stuff, but still full of bugs and incomplete.
The pendulum hasn't made it full swing yet. When it does I think we're going to find MS windows actually slowed mankinds progress and like wise relativity!!!
no beginning and no end is the basis of what infinite is? how is that a not well thought out statement if something is infinite you cant pinpoint its beginning or its end?
Time is not infinite; it must have defined parameters or it isn't time. To say that something is time infinite is a contradiction within those two words. "Time infinite" is undefined and therefore meaningless.
Time is not infinite because infinity is not infinite! Really we're dealing with an undefined term!! When you say time is infinite you are actually superimposing two non congruent frames of reference and assuming they are one single frame of reference. Ultimately, the problem is not one of time or infinity but confusion between what is a question and what is an answer. You are mixing the two. You do not know which is which. This confuses you.
The physcisists prooved that the M-Theory created the big bang and the distance between the memberanes or (M), increases, this is the dark matter that means the universe is infinite....
@xisoxstew411 When I refer to God I don't necessary mean of a religion or a bible. I am referring to a creator of the universe. ENERGY is the creator of the universe. It can not be created or destroyed. It has no beginning and has no end (eternal). If you see the similarity in the definition for GOD then you can draw your own conlcosion.
an unintelligent force created intelligence, systems,...cycles and the intellectual complex mind that sets up governments and policies used to govern an entire planet? I'm sorry but that just sounds stupid once you reason on it. Seems like ur in some sort of denial about an intelligent being starting the whole thing.
@oneworldkingdom Well do you know how He looks like and what he is made of? You just assume everything about Him right? If you don't believe in evolution then you are on a different track of understanding the universe. After comparing the definition of both, I made my own conclusion but I'm not here to argue the conclusion of others.
What did i assume? Then why are you arguing with me? Don't be a victim of what you see. Because 99% of existence is what you have never seen or ever will see.
@jeffaquarius I never argued, you did. I have only 3 questions for you to answer to understand your point. Your first reply to my comment deserves an answer.
what mrperseus2009 i think meant was that technically there is no begging or end because time is just a measurement of events and happenings in our perceived world like the night and day measuring the sun setting and rising. its a way to keep track of happenings and planning what happens next since there is no actual "time" that implies that everything happens at one instant time just anoother measurement we percieve granted we wud be lost without it
Also these cycles would be patterns, so the vibraton would always be the same for each kind of string. This would account for different kinds of strings with different vibrations.
Since there are 10 dimensions explained in string theory, maybe the energy overlaps these curved dimenions, and they keep redisributing the energy in an endless cycle.
If strings can't be true due to their need of energy, where do atoms get their energy? I don't see any difference there. If energy can't be created out of nothing and it can't be destroyed, why the hell the strings couldn't be true if neutrons and protons are?
if strings are the basic particle,then all the energy we get is due to their movement or vibration.. nw since energy can neither be created or destroyed,from where these strings get energy to vibrate?
they vibrate in 10 dimensional space, meaning that momentum is transferred in ways that seem paradoxical: energy can be passes to a string from any point in 10-D space, either from our universe or others.
well by that i can conclude strings r not mass..they dont look as its shown in the video.. they r quantum of sumthing which can travel time and do any thing lyk gng to any dimention.&they r soo small that r laws of physics cant hold true for them
exactly if its paradoxical remember that at the quantum level everything is unpredictable, if everything is unpredictable at the quantum level, imagine in other dimensions where our laws of physics don't apply?
Energy was given to them at the beginning of the universe: during the big bang. That's when all of the energy was created/released and put in to objects. More energy in the universe cannot be created, but that doesn't mean objects can't have energy to begin with. And that energy is transferred from one substance to another. The only time energy is lost is in the form of heat.
if the strings were like the strings on an instrument, then wouldnt diffrent frequencies have to be diffrent length? I doubt vary much that they would just vibrate diffrently...and, that said, what causes them to vibrate??? They cant possibly contain free energy. Any thoughts???
we live in a multi verse,with infinite dimensions.universes with no begining no end.the whole fabric of the universe is nothing more than mathematics manisfested physicaly.mathematic integers before and after zero are infinite.
also, 1 dimension is created by atoms, and the "second" dimension is created by sequences of particles from the 1st dimension, now the 3rd dimension is created of particles from the 2nd dimension. In other words, all dimensions are connected some how. My theory is that in our dimension, we have all 4 parts of matter, but in other dimensions, it may not contain all for and therefore, it can not create a virtual image of the dimension. Also, who says that the dimensions follow our rules of physics
before i say anything, all that i have to say is that im only 13 years old.... so, my theory is that to us, humans, there are only 3 dimensions, considering that we are 3-D creatures. Therefore, only 3 dimensions are visible to us. However, for instance, an ant can explore more than us thereby, that may be capable of visiting 4+ dimensions. Also, the strings have infinite movements or "degrees of freedom", therefore, let's say 100k of those movements represent 1-D, and so on.Istillhavetoworkonit
you are a very knowledgeable 13 year old. Very articulate, but no... 4th dimention can be ROUGHLY explained as TIME, or Movement of the objects of the universe... its... strange, but thats what i know it to be.
Get a physics degree then start conducting research if you think knowing everything is so simple... You could be remembered by the human race for thousands of years for your contribution
are you talking about Wikipedia? What I hear is that people can edit Wikipedia and put in wrong information. You can say that the strings are the size of your house or something.
That's why when there was an article about "Snausages" (No longer an article there) I made a claim that my dog was the one used for the mascot, but it fell down the stairs so they used a cartoon one instead.
That was listed as "true" on Wikipedia for two years.
Dude. Anybody can post something on wikipedia. It doesn't have to be backed up. I saw an article for a flying car. They made up a model number and everything.
We're going in a huge circle right now. The point i'm trying to make, is that PEOPLE CAN FUCKING PRETEND THEY HAVE A PHYSICS DEGREE IF THEY WANT TO. ITS THE FUCKING INTERNET.
whats the name of the cello piece of music shes playing?
coltsrule5150 3 days ago
I totally recommend to read brian green´s books if you´re interested in this topic.
smackmabitchup 1 week ago
"if we can only master"...
You should seriously consider why he said that-for this is exactly the problem of humanity-They keep seeking endlessly how to USE things,yet...Check for WHAT they are using it all-and the way they use it is eventually for growing bigger/stronger/faster and so on,or just to satisfy their stupid emotional craving,or simply for the goal of Total dominion of everything.
I believe the problem with science resides within the people who explore it-for their goals are empty.
Wharwulif 1 week ago
Yep... Ed Witten murdered a guy.
LeandroCreatini 1 week ago
Odd responses on this video once more.
sonfowler1127 1 month ago
I think this section includes the best basic summary I've ever seen or read.
ksmartialarts 1 month ago
I am so fucking confused...
Pepipso 2 months ago
So strings are made of energy? Is there any smaller building block?
seenybeany 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
can anyone shed some light on this theory. I'm 15 going into my PHD and iv just learnt that I'm going to be looking into 'string theory'. can anyone that is studying this please simplify it as it is my first day of knowing.
truevengeance2801 3 months ago
Its amazing that in sting theory music has made up life!!!
Cazoes 4 months ago in playlist More videos from ogniank 3
This has been flagged as spam show
few years ago two parents went out for dinner. A few hours later, the babysitter was calling to see if she could cover up the clown statue in the kids' room, the father said "Get the kids and get out of the house, we'll call the police, we don't have a clown statue". The "clown statue" was actually a killer that escaped from jail. If you don't post this on 10 videos tonight the clown will be in your bed at 3:00am with a chainsaw in his hand
XxxLingglinggxxx 5 months ago
3:18 a guy!
arfatx 5 months ago
Oh NOVA how do I love thee? Let me count the ways... I love you in the first dimension, I love your image in 2D, 3D you are all around me, 4D you are with me always. ... 5D you are here again, and in 6D you're fucking i dunno I can't wrap my head around you...
ricochet188 6 months ago 2
A truism of this is that it is irrational to consider fundamental particles as, well, fundamental. Why would scientists having discovered the atom, then the nucleus, then the proton and neutron and then the quark, ever assume that this was the limit. Dogs have small fleas upon their back which do annoy and bite them, and small fleas have lesser fleas, and so on ad infinitum.
Huttate1 7 months ago
@Huttate1 Not really, an infinite series of matryoshka dolls ' ad infinitum' isn't rational. In fact maximum length planes were defined long ago. A plank length is pretty much as small as we believe you can go.
CmdrTobs 7 months ago
Comment removed
joslinnick 7 months ago
i think the theory of everything all goes back to time travel...i just dont see where else it would fit. they are fucking around with time lol
undergroundjackal 7 months ago
*Head pops*
cryz8210 8 months ago
They make Ed Witten seem like a fucking serial killer. "This.... is ED WITTEN!" que freaky music
MuteHelperComments 8 months ago 18
@MuteHelperComments LOL BRO U ARE SO RIGHT LOLOLOL he looks like the murderer from the movie doctor patch adams.
SophistAtheist 1 month ago
@MuteHelperComments Weird. Here's *exactly* what happened:
A few minutes into the video I happen to casually glance at the top comment. I read it again as it is interesting. I recognize having seen the name previously somewhere in the video. I think "sh!t, i'll have to go look for it now, and that's going to be difficult to find". I was trying to remember some reference point, for a few seconds while the video is still playing, when the exact part (creepy intro) played at that very moment.
mokopa 3 weeks ago
This is why I could Never ever be a physicists. I just couldn't sit in a attic spending hours and hours accomplishing nothing. That would drive me insane.
vampov 10 months ago
@vampov
A lot of them do it for the same reason gamers play games. Even if they know they won't accomplish anything they do it because physics holds their interests.
AgentGhost 9 months ago 2
@vampov Never played a computer game or a board game. Read a book or done some art or modelling? These people do it because they enjoy it.
Huttate1 7 months ago
WITTEN, Whitman (???)
BallaExotic 10 months ago
Whitman - smart or not - what a dick
bryanebrown27 11 months ago
@bryanebrown27 Why?
Hobbzie22 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Music of the spheres
gregdshand 11 months ago
Music of the spheres...
gregdshand 11 months ago
Ed Whitman, heavyweight champion of physicist's.
fushion999 11 months ago 2
gotta love all the oversimplified models they give you. My fav was the baseball one
shib340 1 year ago
does this means that if we could learn how to change strings vibrations we could create objects from the air?????? :O
Romavolov 1 year ago
@Romavolov Well...they already know how to do that...but what kind of equipment would you need to do such a feat? Or if you could xD meditate enough as to change they way the energy that makes the atoms in your body be whatever they are...then you could change your very structure. Wich starts to be more of a philosophical matter because what is exactly that wich makes you a human. For now...i'm only text in a screen for you...for someone else i'm a body living...vibrating. So yeah...
thehornypuppy 1 year ago
3:07 he cracked me up
kerflop 1 year ago
the Hindu Bagavadgita mentions this string? or vibration? in Brahman?
Rico8458 1 year ago
The song is Bach's "Prelude to Suite Number One in G Major (BWV 1007)"
Shouldn't the "M" stand for "membrane"?
duffmasterofpuppets 1 year ago
@duffmasterofpuppets yea
2814199660 1 year ago
Apply Law Of Attraction and they would have it tomorrow!!
gregoriodavila 1 year ago
The String Theory: The Only Good Thing About the Eighties.
mussman717word 1 year ago
I guess nothing on youtube is immune to senseless arguing
chevezez 1 year ago
I don't understand how billions of tiny oscillating energy strings could compose particles of solid matter. Also, how can their frequencies determine things like charge? and on that matter, are these strings also subject to the law of duality?
sgb1223 1 year ago
@sgb1223 Everything is vibration. And these strings are what they are interpreting as the vibration. EVERYTHING IS VIBRATION! Einstien said it first... but it has always been so.
gregoriodavila 1 year ago
"Well we all think we're very smart,but he's so much smarter than the rest of us"GOD DAMMIT WTF DOES THAT MAKE ME!A MONKEY??
KaminariKatta 1 year ago
This is why we keep Theoretical physicists in some form of laboratory environment, so they get a better grip on reality. they take perfectly fine models such as the quark models and literally tie them up in knots.there's no experimental evidence to prove string theory, it does'nt matter how beautifull or elegant the theory is if it does'nt agree with experiment, its wrong.it gets way too much hype, don't get me wrong i love theoretical physics but this is just too theoretical.
SpecterReflector 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Energy sources without the need for fuel or energy input exist ,But Millions are spend in supressing that information,Check this free energy magnet motor at LT-MAGNET-MOTORdotCOM ,The revolution begins!
slanderousndgs 1 year ago
A 1 followed by 105 zeros thats the number of strings in our known universe but even thats a drop in the bucket next to the infinitverse
faithie70 1 year ago
its good but in additation of the 11th diamentation this theory changed
adityashingade 1 year ago
You are just a vibration
zzztano1zz 1 year ago
i wanna bang the cello player
denshaotoko89 1 year ago 4
what vibrates strings
vlatin1 1 year ago
@vlatin1 energy and the extra dimensions.
god, pay attention.
shoshanish 1 year ago
@shoshanish
What energy? Do you mean, you think it 's coming from the other dimensions
vlatin1 1 year ago
@vlatin1 no, the other dimentions being there AND the energy that is in EVERY particle.
god, it says it all in the first few vids!
shoshanish 1 year ago
@shoshanish
You must be a child, you are not making any sense, the other dimensions being there??? and how would energy within matter vibrate strings.
vlatin1 1 year ago
@vlatin1 dude, im just repaeting what they said in thhe video, got it?
god, you like my classmate who doesnt get something until the teacher tells him like 20 times.
shoshanish 1 year ago
@shoshanish dude, just fucking rewatch the show.
shoshanish 1 year ago
@shoshanish do you lack common courtesy? This isnt 2x=1. Its string theory. Without asking questions, how can we progress even further? for every 1*10^99 questions asked, atleast one of them are bound to be a revolutionary one. Imagine how many times these guys with nobel prizes have asked themselves 'stupid' questions. its part of the process!
"god, you like my classmate who doesnt get something until the teacher tells him like 20 times." i'm worried that this bothers you.
neomerik 1 year ago
@neomerik A. wasnt talking to you, butt the fuck out.
B. shutthefuckup, did you even read all my comments, im just reapeating what was said in the video, if one does not get the video, one shouldnt be trying to watch this stuff.
S.T.F.U
shoshanish 1 year ago
@neomerik ALSO, BLOCKED.
shoshanish 1 year ago
@shoshanish haha, you are obviously joking. either that or you got some sort of disorder. whatever floats your boat i guess.
neomerik 1 year ago
@neomerik no, im not, im just saying what the past 2 parts of this episode said.
god, wtf is so fucking hard?
shoshanish 1 year ago
Does another universe use something else then the strings?
TonyFirelli 1 year ago
i need to smoke what that nigga be smoking
69MrUsername69 1 year ago
3:35 Brian's a creeper...
sjsawyer 1 year ago
So, God is a musician - Faithless are right: "God is a DJ" :DDD I wonder if we shrink to the size of strings, how the world will change, and do we really see strings in black space like in animation here, or in white light, or anything else imaginable..
apelsinuke 1 year ago
i like cake!
DoublePines 1 year ago
@DoublePines Ur a f@g yet agian
MrUltramule 1 year ago
wait. quarks ARE strings? or inside the quarks, are strings?
greatestwhoeverlived 1 year ago
@greatestwhoeverlived Yes!
AsmodeanSDAJ 1 year ago
@greatestwhoeverlived
quarks are the strings
bdwilson1000 1 year ago
@bdwilson1000 quarks make up protons, but even smaller are the strings, much much smaller
wakaiarmstrong 1 year ago
I like it, logical
badboy12380 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
I dunno sometimes i think the universe is much more simpler than all this. Extra dimensions and all this blah blah blah. Who's to say time is an actual dimension? Time isn't something you can see or feel. It's something the human mind completely made up. I gues the ultimate question which is what confuses the human mind is if time started....why did it start? And what was before time? Was there time? or nothing at all? and if nothing at all what was it? See where this is getting us...
Gforcebond 1 year ago
I think we need to steer away from the word god, personally.
Elsweyr666 1 year ago
@Elsweyr666 I think we need to steer away from dispraising someone for being christian, atheist, muslim, jew or whatever, personally.
noclipus5 1 year ago
want to hear a funny joke? "god did it" hahahahaha
jannemnne 1 year ago
don't start.
ldbboosha 1 year ago 16
ah...the never stoping quarrel between idiots and seekers - we are all almost equaly blind to the truth. But...is there a truth? And if there is - can we comprehend it from were we are right now ? One thing for sure...I rather be a seeker of truth rather then an idiot. The movie rocks btw , it was a pleasure to watch :)
koti1974 1 year ago
The cost is more than the gold is worth once you've turned lead into gold. Same with turning a turd into a diamond.
imok66 2 years ago 3
5 theory perhaps there is more, but how can light be divided into rainbows ?
dan020350 2 years ago
It's called refraction, bending of light, like shining a beam of light at a prism at a particular angle which refracts the light.
skyliner288 1 year ago
@skylineer288 If light is divided by refraction and that is how we see different colors. Is the universe the color of one big white light, but our eyes ( being refractive ?) help us recognize the divisions? I wonder is this what Adam and Eve saw? :)
dan020350 1 year ago
th string is flexible, strong, weak, tension, beautiful, ugly like thought.
dan020350 2 years ago
soo if we could manipulate these hypothetical "strings" and change elemts could we theoretically thrun lead into gold?
StevoElsupremo 2 years ago
You can already turn lead into gold. Don't need string theory to do that.
Frostfirepenls 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Why are jews so smart this makes me so mad. Stop the settlements you jews.
Graham6762 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
but if there's strings are the blank paper of reality then who is dra
thehourcup 2 years ago
What song is played on the cello around 1:27 ?
badsalad313 2 years ago
its Bach's first cello suite The first movement - Prelude!
italia300 2 years ago 38
And the second one?
Max0Inq 2 years ago
lol... good question.. sorry mate!
italia300 2 years ago
@italia300 Thank you so very much the other night I was working with some equations and while I was looking for the value of the variable this popped into my head and it drove me crazy that I didn't know the name of it! TY! ^_^
Nlrvana99 1 year ago
@italia300 yes, yes it is. and considering the fact that a comment about bach is the highest rated on this video, one can make the assumption that those curious about science, math, and philosohy (the big subjects) also enjoy bach's music, therefor suggesting a relation beween the two. i think its safe to say that bach is the music of the intellectual mind.
blurty16 1 year ago
@italia300 Before watching it I knew what you mean. XDD that is played in that American Express Ad!
awesomelightning 1 year ago
`Time`..`Beginning`..`End`..`Infinite`...these are all terms created by Man.The fact of the matter is, we don`t yet fully understand the absolute scheme of things...whatever that may be.
LeconsdAnalyse 2 years ago
No shit.
SaraCufer 2 years ago
Is the universe infinite? if it is, then it is as infinite large as it is small, so how can we even begin to say this is the smallest of the small?
slowdub 2 years ago
Theres no number called infinite. Its just a concept like a circle.
juggep80 2 years ago 2
Id say its more like it has no center like a fractal, if it doesnt have a center and u say its like a circle then no matter how far I travel in space I will always end up in the place I started, we have to understand that center, start and end are concepts made by us, the same goes for size and others I think.
BBZZZZZ 2 years ago
by abandoning the notion that spacetime is a continuum.
ibreakkidslegs 2 years ago
they are only saying it is the smallest of the small that they currently know of, or have a theory for. and as for the universe being infinite that's not entirely true. the known universe is indeed finite, it's just expanding.
kingbane2 2 years ago
Its theoretical.
PrinceJimbo01 2 years ago
Well that's just the point. Basically, think of the days when man standardized clothing into what's called small, medium, & large sizes to create unifomity among soldiers. Standardized clothing was invented. The same can be said about theories. Scientists go out and search for a 'suit' or theory to best describe or 'fit' what they percieve. In this case reaserchers came back with a suit called string thory- it's just a model that seems to work until a better suit is found.
pishdad 2 years ago
Relativity was just a model- a model that was incomplete but worked enough to be verified by experimentation. That is the key- Experimentation. Ultimatly if it can't pass the test of experimentation or until then you can consider it to be philosophy or mathematical literature and nothing more! Proof is the ultimate goal throughout science!! Without that it's merely literature.
pishdad 2 years ago
Ultimately, slowdub, yours is the ultimate infinite loop- the biggest problem in physics- past, present, future!! Ultimately researchers get tired of that and try to force a 'new' theory down everyones throat. They come back with the newest red suit called string thory!! They merely ignore the obvious- if strings are the ultimate fundamental 'particle' then consists of its' building blocks?!!
pishdad 2 years ago
Do you not understand there is no beggining, or end there just is existance of time infinite.
MrPerseus2009 2 years ago
You don't understand the tautology of your own statement. To say that there is not beginning or end but only time infinite is a total contradiction of your very statement!! Ha,ha, ha!! Sorry, I just find that amusing! I'm sorry your statement is not well thought out and is unfortunately irrelevant.
pishdad 2 years ago
and could you explain how his statement contradicts itself? everyone can say everything is wrong but you need evidence to prove it wrong
Shifticek 2 years ago
The simplest answer to your quesiton is that there is 'time' is to also say there is a beginning and end because that is what time is- a beginning and an end. That is the very definition of time itself. If there is no beginning and no end then you are no longer speaking about time!!!!! You are speaking about something which you haven't bothered to define!! I hope that answers you quesiton! It should answer your question because it is a total and complete answer to your question!!!!
pishdad 2 years ago
Time or the temporal in physics is just a word that describes intervals of change, it has nothing to do with beginning and end. In relativity it's called spacetime they are non-categorically differentiable, one of the effects of which, in the case of time, is non-simultaneity (which *is* evidenced and used in modern technology namely GPS systems) proving "time" or simply the interval of change an object goes through is utterly relative to each respective object's velocity.
Slip819 2 years ago
I respectfully disagree with you. When someone refers to intervals of "change" this implies a start and a stop, hence beginning and end if for nothing more the 'interval' itself. Additionally, you can refer to spacetime as much as you want which proves nothing except the language relativity refers to in respect with time. Since relativity bar far falls short of being a comprehensible explanation of reality it's use of the concept of time is by far the final word.
pishdad 2 years ago
I'm aware of the spacetime concept, however I consider this to be a 'fudge' element. A faux pas in physics. It's a seductive concept but I believe it is more of an obstacle to our path of understanding reality than it is a help. Much like Microsoft windows is to computers!!! Lol!! I've said it before, relativity is the MS windows of physics- it works at 'some' level, calculates some stuff, but still full of bugs and incomplete.
pishdad 2 years ago
The pendulum hasn't made it full swing yet. When it does I think we're going to find MS windows actually slowed mankinds progress and like wise relativity!!!
pishdad 2 years ago
no beginning and no end is the basis of what infinite is? how is that a not well thought out statement if something is infinite you cant pinpoint its beginning or its end?
EtheralDismay91 2 years ago
Time is not infinite; it must have defined parameters or it isn't time. To say that something is time infinite is a contradiction within those two words. "Time infinite" is undefined and therefore meaningless.
pishdad 2 years ago
who says time has to be finite? who says that is not a "line"? big bang - creates universe
who creates big bang? god? then who created god? one way or another there is always an infinite theory im sry if i offended your religion
xisoxstew411 2 years ago
Time is not infinite because infinity is not infinite! Really we're dealing with an undefined term!! When you say time is infinite you are actually superimposing two non congruent frames of reference and assuming they are one single frame of reference. Ultimately, the problem is not one of time or infinity but confusion between what is a question and what is an answer. You are mixing the two. You do not know which is which. This confuses you.
pishdad 2 years ago
i agree with you. i feel jelous of people that have faith in a greater being.
ulyssesbarbosa 2 years ago
The physcisists prooved that the M-Theory created the big bang and the distance between the memberanes or (M), increases, this is the dark matter that means the universe is infinite....
skyliner288 1 year ago
@xisoxstew411 When I refer to God I don't necessary mean of a religion or a bible. I am referring to a creator of the universe. ENERGY is the creator of the universe. It can not be created or destroyed. It has no beginning and has no end (eternal). If you see the similarity in the definition for GOD then you can draw your own conlcosion.
jeffaquarius 1 year ago
an unintelligent force created intelligence, systems,...cycles and the intellectual complex mind that sets up governments and policies used to govern an entire planet? I'm sorry but that just sounds stupid once you reason on it. Seems like ur in some sort of denial about an intelligent being starting the whole thing.
oneworldkingdom 1 year ago
@oneworldkingdom Well do you know how He looks like and what he is made of? You just assume everything about Him right? If you don't believe in evolution then you are on a different track of understanding the universe. After comparing the definition of both, I made my own conclusion but I'm not here to argue the conclusion of others.
jeffaquarius 1 year ago
What did i assume? Then why are you arguing with me? Don't be a victim of what you see. Because 99% of existence is what you have never seen or ever will see.
oneworldkingdom 1 year ago
@jeffaquarius I never argued, you did. I have only 3 questions for you to answer to understand your point. Your first reply to my comment deserves an answer.
jeffaquarius 1 year ago
why not? it's very possible.
murrangurk 1 year ago
what mrperseus2009 i think meant was that technically there is no begging or end because time is just a measurement of events and happenings in our perceived world like the night and day measuring the sun setting and rising. its a way to keep track of happenings and planning what happens next since there is no actual "time" that implies that everything happens at one instant time just anoother measurement we percieve granted we wud be lost without it
crazycatmanful 2 years ago
3:34 sketchy!
Koradyn 2 years ago
Also these cycles would be patterns, so the vibraton would always be the same for each kind of string. This would account for different kinds of strings with different vibrations.
blitzezwrath 2 years ago
Since there are 10 dimensions explained in string theory, maybe the energy overlaps these curved dimenions, and they keep redisributing the energy in an endless cycle.
blitzezwrath 2 years ago
If strings can't be true due to their need of energy, where do atoms get their energy? I don't see any difference there. If energy can't be created out of nothing and it can't be destroyed, why the hell the strings couldn't be true if neutrons and protons are?
kirlinks 2 years ago
if strings are the basic particle,then all the energy we get is due to their movement or vibration.. nw since energy can neither be created or destroyed,from where these strings get energy to vibrate?
basilk27 2 years ago
AH FUCK! I GUESS THEY DIDN'T THINK OF THAT. Okay, let's inform string theory central they're out of business.
supimAndriy 2 years ago
they vibrate in 10 dimensional space, meaning that momentum is transferred in ways that seem paradoxical: energy can be passes to a string from any point in 10-D space, either from our universe or others.
mechanonycal 2 years ago
well by that i can conclude strings r not mass..they dont look as its shown in the video.. they r quantum of sumthing which can travel time and do any thing lyk gng to any dimention.&they r soo small that r laws of physics cant hold true for them
basilk27 2 years ago
"they r soo small that r laws of physics cant hold true for them "
Well, our macro physics laws don't hold true for them, but some of our quantum laws hold true for strings.
FOOLYCOOLY 2 years ago
Its like newtonian physics cannot predict the curvature of space....
charlieking100 2 years ago
exactly if its paradoxical remember that at the quantum level everything is unpredictable, if everything is unpredictable at the quantum level, imagine in other dimensions where our laws of physics don't apply?
EtheralDismay91 2 years ago 2
Energy was given to them at the beginning of the universe: during the big bang. That's when all of the energy was created/released and put in to objects. More energy in the universe cannot be created, but that doesn't mean objects can't have energy to begin with. And that energy is transferred from one substance to another. The only time energy is lost is in the form of heat.
FOOLYCOOLY 2 years ago
Energy can be turned into mass and vica versa
fivexthethird 2 years ago
they dont waste energy by vibrating so the question remains the same
logoth80 2 years ago 2
if the strings were like the strings on an instrument, then wouldnt diffrent frequencies have to be diffrent length? I doubt vary much that they would just vibrate diffrently...and, that said, what causes them to vibrate??? They cant possibly contain free energy. Any thoughts???
EpziWasHere 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
someone agree: the dude sounds really gay at 3:50 - 3:54.
iuzarneim 2 years ago
we live in a multi verse,with infinite dimensions.universes with no begining no end.the whole fabric of the universe is nothing more than mathematics manisfested physicaly.mathematic integers before and after zero are infinite.
taker254isback 2 years ago
Math can't lie. It might not always tell the whole answer, but it cannot lie.
jtown374 2 years ago 5
varialproductions they are aparrentlry made of pure energy
AsEOfSp8dES14 2 years ago
whats the sting made of?
ah thank you!
VarialProductions 2 years ago
Superstrings lol
deathangelsakura 2 years ago
also, 1 dimension is created by atoms, and the "second" dimension is created by sequences of particles from the 1st dimension, now the 3rd dimension is created of particles from the 2nd dimension. In other words, all dimensions are connected some how. My theory is that in our dimension, we have all 4 parts of matter, but in other dimensions, it may not contain all for and therefore, it can not create a virtual image of the dimension. Also, who says that the dimensions follow our rules of physics
Br0k3nResponse 2 years ago
before i say anything, all that i have to say is that im only 13 years old.... so, my theory is that to us, humans, there are only 3 dimensions, considering that we are 3-D creatures. Therefore, only 3 dimensions are visible to us. However, for instance, an ant can explore more than us thereby, that may be capable of visiting 4+ dimensions. Also, the strings have infinite movements or "degrees of freedom", therefore, let's say 100k of those movements represent 1-D, and so on.Istillhavetoworkonit
Br0k3nResponse 2 years ago
you are a very knowledgeable 13 year old. Very articulate, but no... 4th dimention can be ROUGHLY explained as TIME, or Movement of the objects of the universe... its... strange, but thats what i know it to be.
EpziWasHere 2 years ago
yeah i admit, that part of my theory seemed quite wierd... i have gotten more knowledgeable on this topic and have some other thoughts.
Br0k3nResponse 2 years ago
ok i still havent heard where these strings came from mand how they explain all that is whats the problem?
niddasa 2 years ago
Get a physics degree then start conducting research if you think knowing everything is so simple... You could be remembered by the human race for thousands of years for your contribution
bcmalloy 2 years ago
no they should explain it but they cant
niddasa 2 years ago
I want to punch the host in the face with a meat grinder.
Only if that was possible....
hairface13 2 years ago
if it's a theory of everything i would assume that it would have every flavor, no? lol...
chocobosROK 2 years ago
Never thought Attraction from females wearing G-strings is one of the Greatest theory in the world.
licksuck 2 years ago
wiki says strings would be 10 ^ -35 metres and quarks 10 ^ -18 metres in size.
So if a quark was scaled up to 100 metres a string would have the equivalent size of the nucleus of an atom.
goldreserve 2 years ago
are you talking about Wikipedia? What I hear is that people can edit Wikipedia and put in wrong information. You can say that the strings are the size of your house or something.
senor47 2 years ago
Completely untrue. Wikipedia is a collection of resources and references.
Raykak 2 years ago
Yes, Wikipedia is so reliable.
That's why when there was an article about "Snausages" (No longer an article there) I made a claim that my dog was the one used for the mascot, but it fell down the stairs so they used a cartoon one instead.
That was listed as "true" on Wikipedia for two years.
How reliable that source is!
Bowshi 2 years ago
Except you did not reference it.
Wikipedia most likely has a referenced fact on the currently theorized size of strings.
Raykak 2 years ago
Dude. Anybody can post something on wikipedia. It doesn't have to be backed up. I saw an article for a flying car. They made up a model number and everything.
drone713 2 years ago
Not anyone can reference a fact.
Why are you so fucking stupid?
Raykak 2 years ago
Have you ever heard of a fake website? You can reference those too, idiot. Not everything on the internet is real dumbshit
drone713 2 years ago
Of course not, but there are certified people on Wikipedia who can be trusted to make claims.
Raykak 2 years ago
and who are these certified people
drone713 2 years ago
People with actual physics degrees
Raykak 2 years ago
We're going in a huge circle right now. The point i'm trying to make, is that PEOPLE CAN FUCKING PRETEND THEY HAVE A PHYSICS DEGREE IF THEY WANT TO. ITS THE FUCKING INTERNET.
drone713 2 years ago
You have a disappointing amount of faith in your fellow man.
Raykak 2 years ago
that's why his name is "drone", he'll just continue to be like that. :)
chocobosROK 2 years ago
why all the vulgarity? You are both made up of the same strings.. find common ground.
mcdevster 2 years ago
why did i recieve your comment
chocobosROK 2 years ago
because i think you are all taking things in the wrong direction.. if its not a direct attack its passive aggression
mcdevster 2 years ago
oh, lol. i thought this comment was in response to my other one. my bad.
chocobosROK 2 years ago
hahahaha best comment
Telepcanin 2 years ago
actually there's a flying car.
OmarFernandoChavez 2 years ago
...alright
drone713 2 years ago