@RVDBWOW I'm not sure if that a praise or not for KCs but I don't care either way.. I liked this version maybe as much as the Beatles..
but I came here to say if you like the engineer you should read Geoff Emmerick's book about working with the Beatles starting with Revolver when he was 19 (!) through St. Pepper and the 'awful' White Album sessions.. it's pretty fascinating!
being from up north does not give the excuse to perform beatles songs badly. this song doesn't even suit you, every other word isn't "oh", "na" or "da"
the timing is all off ... sounds paint by numbers. no feeling. sorry about that. can't all be oasis. i'm not an oasis fan but they blew everyone else away in these sessions.
I love how thy didn't ruin the song with the new gay style of music such as glee's cover of hello goodbye , Jonas Brothers version of hello goodbye , and Godheads cover of Eleanor Rigby , This has to be the best cover of a song i've ever seen. :)
Yes, respectful... so that it's kind of lifeless. Like playing classical music, when all the fire and danger and invention of the original has been laid dead on a page. Like a high school girl, politely playing a Beethoven piano sonata, without a flicker of passion. Now imagine playing 'Getting Better' if you'd only just written it - and just before the first take, you suddenly thought of adding that wonderful grinding chord that hangs in the middle. Will it work? Let's see! 1-2-3 FOH!
I once had a football kicked very forcefully into my bollocks.They seemed to spend several agonising seconds slowly sinking back into position having been propelled up towards my stomach. I sank to my knees and cried like a baby.
Fun and games compared to listening to this, though.
almost all cover versions of other people's songs suck but the kaiser chiefs have nailed it and made it sound good (perhaps better) than the orignal version.
When I was a kid my dad played cricket on a local field. There was a crude corrugated iron construction which served as a toilet. My little brother and I used to hold our breath when we dashed in and out as quickly as we could for fear of vomiting. It was full of faeces and flies and stank to high heaven, especially in hot weather.
When I was a kid my dad played cricket on a local field. There was a crude corrugated iron construction which served as a toilet. My little brother and I used to hold our breath when we dashed in and out as quickly as we could for fear of vomiting. It was full of faeces and flies and stank to high heaven, especially in hot weather.
Not bad, really. I see some people complain about how poor the guitar is, or the voice... yes, it sounds a bit plain, but it has to do with the fact that The Beatles did things in studio that not even themselves were able to do again...
@thenowuk Noone is these days. It's takes years to learn how to record properly with 60's equipment. And whats the point, you can just record with better equipment now. You really think the Beatles would have recorded on low quality 4 track recorders if they had another solution?
@jjay75 Lots of musicians still use old analogue gear,tapes,etc....the warmth of sound is incomparable,Jack White for example.....anyway,the point was,they're performance is all over the place,timing etc is shockingly bad
@thenowuk I'm not arguing the Kaiser Chiefs are a good band or anything. But analogue equipment these days is either of a very high standard or the bands that use it are trying to sound cheap and live.
The Beatles would have embraced all modern recording technology is my point.
@sathanocracy generally through extended digital techniques that allow them to mesh huge amounts of different stuff together effortlessly, when it used to take the beatles days.
@jjay75 don't exactly know what knowledge you have on audio production but as a sound engineer I know for a fact that digital doesnt compare to analogue in terms of warth, depth or clarity. The Beatles would not have used digital as their engineer, George Martin embraced analogue sound even into the days of digital, so sit down and shut up, 'kay?
Nothing can ever compare to the originals, and why listen to a cover of people playing the same fucking thing when you can listen the geniuses do it themselves.
@anewamericanclassic Don t understand english verbal vandalism but I won t stop you from killing yourself if you want to do that if that is what you are saying (haha)
Vocals are good, but the instrumentation has nothing on the original. Seems as they were trying to recapture the original i would say they have pretty much failed.
Not bad. Kept it close to the same which is a safe. Putting a modern spin on a cover is risky and usally fails. Guitar was weak. Vocals were very well done. Drums were pretty good and a decent bass.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
worst band on the day, it just sounds awful, to cover the beatles you really have to be good! Phonics were the bollocks, amazing band, and travis did a great job!
Google "youtube downloader" and you should be able to find some software that can download the video's (or as mp3's if you like) to your ipod or mp3 player!
For what it's worth, I think this is one of the best Beatles cover versions around. Not a massive fan of the Kaiser Chiefs, but gotta give them this one, they did a cracking job with it.
this was a really good cover... they didn't change it too much where it sounds bad... but they didn't stick so closely to the original to make it not worth listening to instead of listening to the original
They did very LITTLE with the instrumental part in the studio on this song, actually. This is a very heavily vocal song, and it sounds so thick because they just about always have a three-part harmony running.
Bear in mind there are two guitarists in The Beatles, both of which are admittedly better than Whitey. That said, the Kaiser Chiefs take a big chunk of influence from The Beatles and this is a pretty good cover.
(Don't take this as me hating the Chiefs - best live band I've seen - full of energy!)
As much as I've been told otherwise and have tried to prove to myself, the beatles suck! Lennon was an idiot (with some good ideas) but overall they sucked...they were the emo of their time! hahaha
The Beatles are my favourite band; Kaiser Chiefs are my second favourite. My eyes changed to the shape of hearts when I found this!! I really love the cover. To be fair, the original is better than 95% of all covers, but IMO I think they did a good job!
but what better salute to a GREAT band, than young bands 40 YEARS LATER still playing their tunes - as they were originally meant to be played, no new arrangements - raw.
i think the drummer is the worst bit.. but its not THAT bad............ maybe u guys are really really hardcore beatles fanatics? but its not like they messed up or anything...
lol-on all the covers from these sessions they miss the intricate and subtle music of the originals-especially the basslines which they play so poorly
the jonas i FUKING HATE!! bunch ov american twats! how dare they try re-creat a english bands song! ... must agree with the guy below that this is a gud cover version,
Most of the time when bands take great Beatles songs and butcher them. But Kaiser Chiefs did amazing with this song, but that Jonas Brothers remake of Hello Goodbye was terrible. I was genuinely pissed when i heard them play that song.
my daughter has the hots for the Jonas Brothers. She's too young to know about the Beatles too, so I guess she doesn't realize how big of an injustice that song is to the Beales.
It's a shame. Wow 19, well, my Dad used to sing the Beatles to me every night for my bedtime song, so i guess that's why it left such a big imprint on me.
That's so lucky! The last interesting thing to happen here was a snowstorm that left 14 inches. Do you realize that we took up an entire page of comments?
I love the Kaiser Chiefs, really did The Beatles justice.
DylanPaper 2 months ago
you really need to see how they record this songs if you see that you will rethink about the kaiser chiefs XD
praise the audio engineer for the great work back then and even now :)
RVDBWOW 2 months ago
@RVDBWOW I'm not sure if that a praise or not for KCs but I don't care either way.. I liked this version maybe as much as the Beatles..
but I came here to say if you like the engineer you should read Geoff Emmerick's book about working with the Beatles starting with Revolver when he was 19 (!) through St. Pepper and the 'awful' White Album sessions.. it's pretty fascinating!
redcrosseknightmusic 1 month ago
@redcrosseknightmusic thx m8 will do will be fun for my class aswell :)
RVDBWOW 1 month ago
fantastic cover
paully1969 3 months ago
The original was a great exercise in minimalism. There wasn't anything else to strip out of the song. And the auto-tune vocals suck
Voltara 4 months ago
my 2 fav bands! The Beatles! (the song) and The Kaiser Cheifs! =)
liverpoolforeve 5 months ago
I dislike most of the bands that took part in this. But they all did a decent job
pinkfloydrule27 7 months ago
Nice job boys.
slim22rj 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
This video was just added to a music playlist at JustPlay.fm
justplayfm 7 months ago
Wow.
Cheere96 7 months ago
hate autotune... or that fckn' shit on his voice....
osen33 8 months ago
being from up north does not give the excuse to perform beatles songs badly. this song doesn't even suit you, every other word isn't "oh", "na" or "da"
spurs0399 8 months ago
the timing is all off ... sounds paint by numbers. no feeling. sorry about that. can't all be oasis. i'm not an oasis fan but they blew everyone else away in these sessions.
slimturnpike 8 months ago
Apparently it was very cold in the studio...:-)
MsLEHMANN69 8 months ago
not bad...
chicherchio 9 months ago
wow ricky has a really simalar voice!
CaptinAbbey 9 months ago
I reckon Ricky's vocal's sound a bit to robotic and he didn't sound like he was putting a lot into it really :(
newton0606 10 months ago
Vocals are great... could use some more guitar. The bass is a nice departure without showing off. Nice.
openmikescene 10 months ago
Abysmal-all over the fucking place
thenowuk 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Do you hear something from John in Ricks voice?
MrZamura 1 year ago
Do you hear something from John in Ricks voice?
MrZamura 1 year ago 2
i think ricky does humble justice to maca's voice, very good cover
mwolvo 1 year ago
that was pretty amazing :D
emmacranevids24 1 year ago
kaisers are awesome. jonas brothers? WHO THE FUCK ARE JONAS BROTHERS LOL?!
Theris1337 1 year ago 16
@Theris1337 i am tired of guys mentioning the jonas brothers justin bieber, i dont know some random disney kid in EVERY FUCKING VIDEO
areposo 1 year ago
I love how thy didn't ruin the song with the new gay style of music such as glee's cover of hello goodbye , Jonas Brothers version of hello goodbye , and Godheads cover of Eleanor Rigby , This has to be the best cover of a song i've ever seen. :)
TheBeatlesRUL3 1 year ago
@TheBeatlesRUL3
You haven't heard the Dirt Poor Robins' cover of Eleanor Rigby I take it?
thillwl 10 months ago
This is fucking atrocious
rossnicoll 1 year ago
Could've used a little more guitar. Just a little.
JesseBochekTV 1 year ago
Yes, respectful... so that it's kind of lifeless. Like playing classical music, when all the fire and danger and invention of the original has been laid dead on a page. Like a high school girl, politely playing a Beethoven piano sonata, without a flicker of passion. Now imagine playing 'Getting Better' if you'd only just written it - and just before the first take, you suddenly thought of adding that wonderful grinding chord that hangs in the middle. Will it work? Let's see! 1-2-3 FOH!
ClipontheEar 1 year ago
I once had a football kicked very forcefully into my bollocks.They seemed to spend several agonising seconds slowly sinking back into position having been propelled up towards my stomach. I sank to my knees and cried like a baby.
Fun and games compared to listening to this, though.
harveytg 1 year ago
almost all cover versions of other people's songs suck but the kaiser chiefs have nailed it and made it sound good (perhaps better) than the orignal version.
TheSebMyster1 1 year ago
@TheSebMyster1 Except the vocals then... You need to listen to Slade s version of it!
carlphone 1 year ago
@TheSebMyster1 Better? Nah.
fasteddyuk 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
When I was a kid my dad played cricket on a local field. There was a crude corrugated iron construction which served as a toilet. My little brother and I used to hold our breath when we dashed in and out as quickly as we could for fear of vomiting. It was full of faeces and flies and stank to high heaven, especially in hot weather.
Nowhere near as bad as this, though.
harveytg 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
When I was a kid my dad played cricket on a local field. There was a crude corrugated iron construction which served as a toilet. My little brother and I used to hold our breath when we dashed in and out as quickly as we could for fear of vomiting. It was full of faeces and flies and stank to high heaven, especially in hot weather.
Nowhere near as bad as this, though.
harveytg 1 year ago
i love this cover
1995Sian 1 year ago
this cover and the one Travis makes are the only good covers of this cover sessions
sumerez 1 year ago
Comment removed
carlphone 1 year ago
@sumerez Wow you think this is great? How about the vocals and drums? I am not so sure...
carlphone 1 year ago
It's great to see Geoff Emerick. He was 19 when he started recording the Beatles!
HarveyDentLives 1 year ago
love it... sends goose bumps! Good ones x
thebrockieful 1 year ago
what a shiit!
jriverband 1 year ago
Wow. Really not together
dannybighair 1 year ago
Was this tribute album ever recorded? I cannot find it on iTunes.
lockergr 1 year ago
itunes doesnt have everything and yes it was recorded i have it. Doesnt beat the beatles lol not even close ut at least they tried
LeGreatReySteven 1 year ago
Great cover! Right on!
theimakeupmaven 1 year ago 2
Not bad, really. I see some people complain about how poor the guitar is, or the voice... yes, it sounds a bit plain, but it has to do with the fact that The Beatles did things in studio that not even themselves were able to do again...
Cheers!
thesoulbearer 1 year ago 4
Getting better since you've been mine... :)
AllyBification 1 year ago
wow. this really has the beatles style to it!
Bookwormi 1 year ago
Comment removed
carlphone 1 year ago
@carlphone
naturally... lets see if we have the same idea of a bealtes like cover...
Bookwormi 1 year ago
This is just embarrassing-not used to recording without pro-tools obviously
thenowuk 1 year ago
@thenowuk Noone is these days. It's takes years to learn how to record properly with 60's equipment. And whats the point, you can just record with better equipment now. You really think the Beatles would have recorded on low quality 4 track recorders if they had another solution?
jjay75 1 year ago
@jjay75 Lots of musicians still use old analogue gear,tapes,etc....the warmth of sound is incomparable,Jack White for example.....anyway,the point was,they're performance is all over the place,timing etc is shockingly bad
thenowuk 1 year ago
@thenowuk I'm not arguing the Kaiser Chiefs are a good band or anything. But analogue equipment these days is either of a very high standard or the bands that use it are trying to sound cheap and live.
The Beatles would have embraced all modern recording technology is my point.
jjay75 1 year ago
@jjay75 how do they record music today anyway?
sathanocracy 1 year ago
@sathanocracy generally through extended digital techniques that allow them to mesh huge amounts of different stuff together effortlessly, when it used to take the beatles days.
jjay75 1 year ago
@jjay75 don't exactly know what knowledge you have on audio production but as a sound engineer I know for a fact that digital doesnt compare to analogue in terms of warth, depth or clarity. The Beatles would not have used digital as their engineer, George Martin embraced analogue sound even into the days of digital, so sit down and shut up, 'kay?
eddiescribble 1 year ago
Awsome cover! by the Chiefs bout the only 1 that they do (part from Jam ones)
6ftmlmct 1 year ago
shite.
coolbritannia1979 1 year ago
just, amazing.
Yuk1NT 1 year ago
NICE!
BEATLES FOREVER...
NEROGORDO 1 year ago
very brilliant cover!
hokutto 1 year ago 3
This comment has received too many negative votes show
God this cover makes me sick.
anewamericanclassic 1 year ago
SHITE!
lennonsbiggestfan 1 year ago
I like all the covers (except magic numbers) very refreshing and shows what brilliant songs they are
1q6z 1 year ago
"have to admit it's getting BETTER" ???? singer misses the right note, totally
uburei 1 year ago
@uburei EXATCLY he dosen't go high enough
808hnj 1 year ago
So lame.
I don't get why people cover beatles song.
Nothing can ever compare to the originals, and why listen to a cover of people playing the same fucking thing when you can listen the geniuses do it themselves.
anewamericanclassic 1 year ago
Because not everyone in the world is an elitist music douche snob, simply put.
lordteejay89 1 year ago
Comment removed
carlphone 1 year ago
@carlphone lol.
its been 50 years and the beatles are still popular as all hell.
this band is already washed up and will be forgotten in no time.
And I will glady stick with my 'geniuses'.
anewamericanclassic 1 year ago
Comment removed
carlphone 1 year ago
@anewamericanclassic Is hell a popular place?
carlphone 1 year ago
@carlphone i don't know how you could like this cover.
the guitars quiet but aint bad, but the drummer cant fill worth shit, and the vocalist makes me want to shoot myself in the fucking face.
anewamericanclassic 1 year ago
Comment removed
carlphone 1 year ago
@anewamericanclassic Don t understand english verbal vandalism but I won t stop you from killing yourself if you want to do that if that is what you are saying (haha)
carlphone 1 year ago
poop
shareschannel 1 year ago
quality
googoodoll59 1 year ago
Sorry.....they have just killed a great song
h15jkc 1 year ago
no they didnt, they did what they were supposed to do. make a cover version of the song. and thats what they did.
pancakeshitta 1 year ago 3
@h15jkc Vocals not so good, original sound though. Not a great song by the Beatles
carlphone 1 year ago
Bloody great cover.
Saw the beatles live in Leeds in 65 they were not this good.
Well done Kaisers!
2daft4u 2 years ago
Way too fast. The singer just sounds not that great. The structure was altered a little too. Other than that, it was alright.
Killinfloor 2 years ago
didn't like it! the lead singer sounds like a monotonous robot, or he just can't sing!
he sounded out of breath and the whole session felt strained.
bluemeanie81 2 years ago 3
don't like it so much, but a good try. especially the ending!
tschubidi 2 years ago
great cover...cant top the beatles but i like the way they put their own kaiser chiefs sound to it:)<3 beautiful!!
rockabillychickee 2 years ago 2
I like the vocals - needs that working class attitude, but what the hell were they doing with backing, a wasted chance - is it even in time?
TheCapricorn69 2 years ago 2
needs the droning G
Kadeerthejanitor 2 years ago
buen cover
kaiser chiefs es re buena banda
vecetti22 2 years ago
GREAT COVER
chinodan 2 years ago 3
From revo9 - 7/10 for effort lads, if just for effort, can be done so much better.
Vocals rigid, missing that loose feelgood vibe. Nice faithful inclusion of Lennon's harmonies through the verses.
Loosen up.
Less is more.
cheziecat 2 years ago 2
@cheziecat can't agree anymore
just listened to the original
which sounded much better
kenny062300 1 year ago
Vocals are good, but the instrumentation has nothing on the original. Seems as they were trying to recapture the original i would say they have pretty much failed.
Oh the backing vocals are weak too.
OneDeadCop112 2 years ago
I liked it!!! xD
Lhguitar23 2 years ago 2
This is good
amby1984 2 years ago
Not bad. Kept it close to the same which is a safe. Putting a modern spin on a cover is risky and usally fails. Guitar was weak. Vocals were very well done. Drums were pretty good and a decent bass.
HoboJinkins 2 years ago
Good vocal harmonies.the instrumental part is not good.Guitarist is very weak, he adds very little to the song
redyossarian 2 years ago 3
great cover
ianwlad 2 years ago
A great cover, feel proud KC... honest x
paully1969 2 years ago
this is terrible
Cwall96 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
worst band on the day, it just sounds awful, to cover the beatles you really have to be good! Phonics were the bollocks, amazing band, and travis did a great job!
CorrineCT 2 years ago
where can i download this?
alkazoo 2 years ago
get the youtube to mp3 converter add on for firefox .only takes a mo
MUDSHARK111 2 years ago
Google "youtube downloader" and you should be able to find some software that can download the video's (or as mp3's if you like) to your ipod or mp3 player!
Aljess 2 years ago
For what it's worth, I think this is one of the best Beatles cover versions around. Not a massive fan of the Kaiser Chiefs, but gotta give them this one, they did a cracking job with it.
iljn1988 2 years ago
thats time im never getting back
BigBoss2014 2 years ago
this was a really good cover... they didn't change it too much where it sounds bad... but they didn't stick so closely to the original to make it not worth listening to instead of listening to the original
PKNproductions 2 years ago
The instrumental part was so-so, but that's just because The Beatles did a LOT of thing in the studio...but the vocals were really great :O
Linkhare 2 years ago
They did very LITTLE with the instrumental part in the studio on this song, actually. This is a very heavily vocal song, and it sounds so thick because they just about always have a three-part harmony running.
LittleSocrates 2 years ago
It's not the best cover in the world. The original has so many sounds going on in the background, it's fab.
msradx 2 years ago 4
Bear in mind there are two guitarists in The Beatles, both of which are admittedly better than Whitey. That said, the Kaiser Chiefs take a big chunk of influence from The Beatles and this is a pretty good cover.
(Don't take this as me hating the Chiefs - best live band I've seen - full of energy!)
twotrot 2 years ago 3
hosti.... Ricky se esta tranquilo... que cosa mas rara... mola esta versión... lo que pasa es que los Beatles son intocables pero no esta nada mal...
KAISER CHIEFS RULES!!!!
cgmchispitas385 2 years ago
Está muy pitera esta versión de los Kaiser...
pacoiec 2 years ago
I was expecting this to be a terrible version of the song but they actually did a really good job. Not perfect but still highly enjoyable
destructionsnakepit 2 years ago 12
Pretty good, nothing to say about it.
1UpStaff 2 years ago 3
I loved that documentary.... But i wish u cld buy the cd some where... Does any1 know where i can get it? :P xXx
ToPsHoPjUnKy 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
No it doesn't sound well. The Voice sounded to inanimate. This Version is woody. This Band will be overrated.
MrSoul68 2 years ago
Awesome !!!! The new Beatles :PP Congratulations !!!!
pitchoune4987 2 years ago
these guys at least respect the beatles and don't do a gay stupid version of the song
armandsdamanhoo 2 years ago 45
This has been flagged as spam show
like the jonas brothers with hello goodbye?
3pairsofunderwear 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
exactly
armandsdamanhoo 2 years ago
It's completely ridiculous to compare Kaiser Chiefs with the Jonas Brothers
AGENT24 2 years ago 86
@AGENT24 That's right-they're both shit
thenowuk 1 year ago
@AGENT24 I agree. Shame!
theimakeupmaven 1 year ago
@AGENT24 yes. that is true :D
greijscha 1 year ago
r u serious???
dawapana 2 years ago
great job chiefs!
soccerrocks5 2 years ago 4
This has been flagged as spam show
As much as I've been told otherwise and have tried to prove to myself, the beatles suck! Lennon was an idiot (with some good ideas) but overall they sucked...they were the emo of their time! hahaha
icebergbart216 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
hahahahahahahahahahahaha
yeah wtf we all live on a yellow submarine
bollux .. u do mate XD
Thecrimson08 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
who are the 'beatles'? are they a band?
boilerwa85 2 years ago
oh i hope that is irony...
joannet17 2 years ago
The Beatles are my favourite band; Kaiser Chiefs are my second favourite. My eyes changed to the shape of hearts when I found this!! I really love the cover. To be fair, the original is better than 95% of all covers, but IMO I think they did a good job!
poephooofd 2 years ago 3
Reading again it sounded a bit unclear; I meant that in 95% of the cases originals are better than covers, ofcourse, not just on this song.
poephooofd 2 years ago
Alright! So it's not the Beatles . .
but what better salute to a GREAT band, than young bands 40 YEARS LATER still playing their tunes - as they were originally meant to be played, no new arrangements - raw.
I watched this when it aired on the BBC - FAB!
soniclady89 2 years ago 6
me too ! It was pretty late on air , wasn't it ?
elke009 2 years ago
it sounds rushed toward the end, but other than that, this is one of the best covers i've heard :)
PinayPopstar125 2 years ago 2
very poor these boys. it hurts to hear it any longer
alrighttube 2 years ago
It's recorded 1960's style on analgoue 4-track. What did you expect?!
Marcuskristicus 2 years ago
ricky wilson is changing his shirt after a fev seconds... wtf?
xD
i love the kaiser chiefs. and the drummer is hot.
pupskopf 2 years ago 2
i think the drummer is the worst bit.. but its not THAT bad............ maybe u guys are really really hardcore beatles fanatics? but its not like they messed up or anything...
djkikis 2 years ago
oh c'mon.
it's not bad.
gabyluvscheese90 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
it sounds rushed
damarust 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
ha ha ha the kaiser cheifs make me laugh so hard. There a very funny band. They are possibly the best joke I've ever seen or heard.
lsdarcy 2 years ago
What was john's line..."Can't get no worse". Guess he was right after all.
cettuce3 2 years ago
I didn't know this song could be so lousily played
tigarx 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
this is absolute dog shit
fuckin dicks
noelwannabe 2 years ago
ha paul mccartney said he liked this band...lame
TIPPERBLK 2 years ago
Lamentable.
TheWeatherman1987 2 years ago
wtf? this sucks. damn guitarist didn't even attempt to play what's on the record. fucking gay. take this shit down.
DayTripperLennon 2 years ago
lol-on all the covers from these sessions they miss the intricate and subtle music of the originals-especially the basslines which they play so poorly
thenowuk 2 years ago
Abysmal.
thenowuk 2 years ago
I enjoyed it, no it's not the original, but still cool to listen to.
ComDisk16 2 years ago
now you can hear how actually amazing the beatles were when you hear this crap.
rickenbacker67 2 years ago
love it
vanderfoxe 2 years ago
shit
fukoxD 2 years ago
isn't so bad
Nemergussis 2 years ago
they just ruined a great song..
theuc 2 years ago
LOL !
Ic1cle 3 years ago
I absolutely love the Kaiser Chiefs, but I find this a bit mediocre.
Covering certain Beatles songs is never an easy task.
Ic1cle 3 years ago
and this is *only* the 20th take
tigarx 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
woah man that guy cant sing for shit
colmanaucoin 3 years ago
he do it better than u 4 sure
stupid1dora 3 years ago 4
the jonas i FUKING HATE!! bunch ov american twats! how dare they try re-creat a english bands song! ... must agree with the guy below that this is a gud cover version,
ruddyy123 3 years ago 7
Most of the time when bands take great Beatles songs and butcher them. But Kaiser Chiefs did amazing with this song, but that Jonas Brothers remake of Hello Goodbye was terrible. I was genuinely pissed when i heard them play that song.
maladroitgirl 3 years ago 6
The Jonas Brothers should never have done that remake. It sounded like crap. I think it actually IS crap.
charmingasalways 3 years ago 3
The first time i heard it i was both horrified and angry. Actually i was horrified, then angry.
maladroitgirl 3 years ago
I'm sure Macca was not too pleased either. Why do those little anal fissures think they can cover a Beatles song? They're no more than 20 years old.
charmingasalways 3 years ago
And they just plain suck. Their voice alone makes my ears bleed.
maladroitgirl 3 years ago
my daughter has the hots for the Jonas Brothers. She's too young to know about the Beatles too, so I guess she doesn't realize how big of an injustice that song is to the Beales.
charmingasalways 3 years ago
How old is your daughter? I'm only 13 and i realize the injustice of that remake.
maladroitgirl 3 years ago
she's 19. You pay attention. Too bad the Jonas Brothers didn't read up on the Beatles.
charmingasalways 3 years ago
It's a shame. Wow 19, well, my Dad used to sing the Beatles to me every night for my bedtime song, so i guess that's why it left such a big imprint on me.
maladroitgirl 3 years ago
I saw Sean Lennon live last year. He's funny like his dad.
charmingasalways 3 years ago
Sweet! I would have loved to see that, but i live in Wisconsin and nothing ever happens here.
maladroitgirl 3 years ago
I live in Vermont. I was astounded that he came here. I was glad!
charmingasalways 3 years ago
That's so lucky! The last interesting thing to happen here was a snowstorm that left 14 inches. Do you realize that we took up an entire page of comments?
maladroitgirl 3 years ago
I didn't realize that until you mentioned it. That's pretty funny...
charmingasalways 3 years ago