We know that the hypothesis for the God-Quantum Theory is within reach, this just shows how close we are getting to it. To think that Photons can travel faster than the speed of light is mind boggling.
How many Lies do you think you have told in your life? Have you ever stolen anything, even something small? Have you ever looked at a person with lust? Ever used GOD's name as a curse word? If so, GOD sees you as a Lying, thieving, blasphemous, adulterer at heart. The Guilty will end up in Hell. That's not GOD's will. You broke GOD's laws, but Jesus paid your fine! (IF) you Repent, and trust in Christ alone, GOD will forgive every sin you have ever committed, and grant you Eternal life!
@CertifiedBad4ss I'm not trying to be an ass, but your comment shows a fundamental misunderstanding of physics and scale. I'm saying this as a student of physics, and having specifically studied particle physics and neutrinos for the past year. The idea that something larger than our solar system (i.e. a nebula) could affect something that can pass through the empty space of an atom at 299792458m/s (a photon) is silly, & (theoretical) dark matter doesn't interact with electromagnetism.
@CertifiedBad4ss No, it's a very basic thing that all physicists have committed to memory. Electromagnetism matters because light (photons) is an electromagnetic wave, which is also common knowledge among scientists, particles act like waves in quantum mechanics. A net measurement of ALL photons traveling through Earth's atmosphere & gravitational influence reveals that ON AVERAGE they travel about 1m/s slower @ sea level. That's net, 99% of individual photons aren't affected. Connect the dots.
@ScienceofWinning Particles act like particles in quantum mechanics. Photons on the other hand acts both as waves and particles. And when I looked up the speed of light in Earths atmosphere (cant remember that shit from when I was in high school) it was around 90000m/s less than in space, not 1m/s less.
Also according to your channel you have been studying particle physics and neutrinos since you were 17, youtube science shows =/= studying bro.
@CertifiedBad4ss Actually, I'm doing a year long senior project on the behavior of neutrinos & have been privileged to study at collages around my area with many professors and other students of physics, as well as being the top of my class in AP senior physics at my high school. &, in fact, all standalone particles (ESPECIALLY bosons) behave like waves, which is why the Heisenburg uncertainty principle says what it says, & the point is, don't you think FERMI would have checked for the mundane?
@ScienceofWinning It's very likely they did, especially if a dumbass like me could spot it. My original question was if the photon couldn't have been slowed down like they do on Earth, because they never said anything about it in the video.
@CertifiedBad4ss Well, that's why they have a space telescope, so they don't even need much redundant compensation protocols, if any at all to account for atmospheric distortion. They probably didn't touch on it in the video because most people don't think scientifically, & wouldn't have even considered it.
honestly, here is something that I sorta dont get... what exactly tells scientists that nothing can go faster then the speed of light? I mean is there any real evidence that i missed or are they just assuming that?
@myr576 Well, a supernova (which explodes with more energy than our sun will in its entire life span) of a massive star, only expands at the speed of light. I'm not sure if there is some mathematical proof, but if that much force cant push particles beyond the speed of light, I doubt anything else can.
Allah menghiasi langit terdekat (langit dunia, langit 1) dengan bintang-bintang. Langit ke 1 manusia tak mampu menjamah betapa luasnya. Apalagi langit ke 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, dan di atasnya ARSY. Satu hari di hadapan Allah sama dengan 1000 tahun dari tahun-tahun yang kamu hitung. From jokowi61@gamail.com
Why are all scientists so terribly badly dressed? Is it because they're so busy solving the mysteries of the universe they forgot to look in the fucking mirror?
Photons (which are tiny packets of light) have no mass, yet when you split one it breaks up into its individual particles (electrons & positrons which do have mass). Light was also the last force to break off in the big bang (137).
@RiaRadioFMHD773 uhm? Is this new research? Source? Every thing I read about this is that a photon is an elementary particle. That if you split an photon you get 2 photons who share the original energy.
And isn´t Photons packages of Energy, not light?
And Light isn´t a force. There are 4 forces. Electomagnetism (photons), Strong (gluon) -and weak nuclear force (W- and Z-boson), and gravity (unkown).
@RiaRadioFMHD773 "Splitting photons" does not create electron, positron pairs, it happens when a high energy photons such as gamma rays collide with a nucleus. The energy of the photon is converted to mass which is possible according to E=mc^2
Please...could you translate these videos???...or just subtitles... I don't speak english. And think all this information is very interesting. Thank you-
Maybe they can't merge the two theories because one causes the other to happen; a domino effect, morphing strong forces, weak forces and gravitational dominance into what we understand and witness as The Quantum Realm, where Quark formations and other sub atomic structures evolve into "other", newer forms of matter that behave unlike it's parental origins. Just sayin.
Wow, it's people like you that make Science look bad. The LHC simply recorded a subatomic particle (I believe a positron), moving faster than the speed of light. It is still unconfirmed, and has yet to be peer reviewed. Moreoever, that was only one aspect of Einsteins theory. I bet you can't even name which one? :) lmao read a book.
@Haseeebo no it's not about positron you small brat brain it is neutrinos.Neutrinos laugh in Einstein face.Newton kicked Einstein ass pretty ugly, all atoms in the universe are bound so information travels faster then the speed of light and LHC proved another thing that even a particle can travel faster then light ,the other theory E=mc^2 it not belong to Einstein that reality was known before Einstein.The only thing Einstein did is steal this idea and after that they made atomic bomb.Cowards
@Androsstudio Actually there are many theories which already were expecting to measure particles which seem to be faster than light. And the fact that they (maybe) measured something like that doesnt prove Einstein wrong. It actually fits very well into Einstein theory. The Neutrinos just took some shorter way through a Hyperspace. So they traveled with the speed of light, but along a shorter way. From our point of view it looks like they moved faster than the speed of light.
@Androsstudio are u a fking retard? newton's laws are all right until they reach the extremes. Einstein proved that newtons dont apply in extreme situations ( such as the speed of light). And that story of einstein stealing e=mc^2 is fake. trust me bro, e=mc^2 is not the only theory einstein did.
@Androsstudio and wtf? information has no speed.. if it did after a certain distance, it wud take time to process.. so that means information has no speed
"The Beadlingism of Matter" is a hypothesis beging with a definition of Time; Time is the measurement of the transition perion between two distinct events. And explicably tied to the transition period over which the events transpired. Without a clear understanding of what time is, you cannot compare how it equates to another concept.
Once again, scientists got overeager about some tiny bit of data and that gives them such a big head as to think they are smarter than Einstein , but once again they're proven wrong and Einstein is still proven right. Moral of the story? Don't fuck with Jews.
i belive there is a speed faster then light, the speed of time, this however could not be broken but is indeed faster then the speed of light, traveling close to the speed of time would be teleportation
AGAIN what if the speed of light (C=(aprox.) 300000KPS isactually C=0 HA HA seeing EINSTEIN said all speeds (velocitys) are relative and the speed of light does not seem to be relative ?
I come true using own self all over the world. Extended desire to fill up forever, I jump out and transcend reality. My own self has almighty power of all life time and does it from 16 years old again. Return to past. To save father.
I think my life's goal that it is in a certain meaning to do regenerative medicine from bone marrow transplantation, believe there was even the life that can open. I come back in the past and save father.
"Science is a process of elimination" - So true. Should have been followed with "Religion is a process of making up dumb answers when you run into problems".
woah woah woah...900 ms is no delay? she says there is a 900 ms delay and then she says there was no delay. WTF? so scientific readings are only accurate to within ~1 second and they are trying to measure the speed of light like that? I know that's not true so obviously what this lady is saying is bullcrap
@HTSGOSU Clearly you don't understand physics or this video. 900 ms out of 7 billion years is, yes, nothing. Further, it challenges the theory that there is a 'texture' to space-time that would interfere with high energy particles and lends support to the theory that space-time is indeed smooth. Einstein was right again.
the ap published a report saying that a group of scientist observed a neutrino heading faster then the speed of light. if this is found to be true, then the way the world we live in is viewed will be forever changed.
It's like having your lenses refract from looking at a single point to looking at the part of a bigger whole...your eyes suddenly blurs...that's what happens with the brain I suppose...the length of ti9me between refraction and focusing has a train of thought that should not be interrupted to produce theories I propose.
Infinite smallness and infinite largeness...we just can't visualize the distance between the quarks and the space bubbles...thus inhibiting a theory of all...
@AngeloNiklis That's correct. Light is able to be affected by gravity. As an example, when a photon come close to something very heavy (lets say a galaxy) the photon will be "pulled" towards the galaxy, and when it has passed the galaxy the photon will have a slightly different course.
When the photon is heading away from the galaxy it still wont slow down even though the galaxy is trying to pull it back towards itself, because (according to Einstein) the speed of light is constant in vacuum
there is no such thing as time, only motion....all moving forward thru space...if we were fourth dimensional beings, all the movement we see would occur simultanously as one big pulsating, flowing object...perhaps the universe is a giant jellyfish and we are the blood cells rushing thru the veins..some day to coalesce into a protein amino-acid configuration and be ejaculated into anther JF Universe thru a white or black hole....that's my Gooey theory...:D...we are going out forever.....nowhere
Completely throw away self! Lead to the acme of the intoxication indulgence! Fill up! Ideal realization! The materialization of ideal own! I am unification union finish completion form!
Wow, so you presented a theory that was already proven wrong, way to waste my time. While I'm at it, HEY GUYS! DID YOU KNOW THAT IT'S POSSIBLE THAT THE EARTH IS FLAT!?!? But it's not...
I am sick and tire of hearing space and time being associated with each other. "Time" is only a measurement of figmentation of a human's mind or just realitivity. It will always be day one according to the universe and if you lived on Pluto, which takes about 248 yrs to orbit the sun, you would never have a birthday. If anyone is intereated in building a time machine, good-luck with telling the universe what time it is...LOL
@RSwanson1972 I nteat this comment to be wise and weighty in fact......Time is only relative to procesess......hence the slower a human ages the faster he moves through space: And the further he moves from planet earth. It was the specail thoery of relativity that properly quantified time with its relative speed between observers and procesess. Like the pluto comment...
That's stupid. Time IS a dimension we move through at the speed of light. If that wasnt so--there would no such thing as light years--all galaxies in the sky would be seen as they actually are cause LS would be infinite . If time moved faster than light then when you turned on a light it may take a while b4 you SEE it. We could not operate in that world.
God set our motion through time with Light so we see things on earth WHEN they happen..Not b4 or after.
@Rizzy55 Nope! It's smart! Where are you getting these foolish non-facts? Moreover, I'm speaking of "Time" and the non-essence of it. You are getting of the subject, when going into speed of light. I think you mean "Objects" and not "Light"; however, they are both matter, and when matter is in motion, we call it "Energy". There are infinite dimensions and something always make-up somthing. Like I said, '"Time" is only a measurement of realativity of a human's mind"'. Please leave "God" out.
I am sick and tire of hearing space and time being associated with each other. "Time" is only a measurement of figmentation of a human's mind or just realitivity. It will always be day one according to the universe and if you lived on Pluto, which takes about 248 yrs to orbit the sun, you would never have a birthday.
HAHA. No, idiot know it all.
The study of time has nothing to do with earths orbit or the calendar. Why do so many fools shout stupidity with such arrogance?
@Rizzy55 LOL! You don't know who you are talking to - idiot! Those were just an enologies. You cannot study "Time". Because, our 5 senses cannot detect something that does not exist, but only in relativity. As an example, a house-fly see all things in slow motion, when compared to the speed of motion we preceive. We also live in the past in nano-seconds. Because, by the time light enter your eyes and registers by your little brain, it's already the past. Therefore, no-one lives in the present.
@RSwanson1972 Yes time is relative. That's why it's called general relativity.
But time is an actually thing. If there was no such thing as "time" every event from the beginning of the universe, until the end, would happen all at once.
Days, months, and years are all man-made labels that we came up with so we can have some way of relating to any given "time." But time itself does exist.
@aPpLeJuIcE37RainLucy Perception is a funny thing when comparing flies VS humams. As flies see speed of light at a different rate than humans do. Meaning that the duraion of "Time" perceived is much prolonged for a fly, than human perception of "Time". This is why it is deficult to slap a fly, as they see many more frams per second. In other-words, it is up to the brain to determine how fast something is preceived. So, keep in mind, if you ever decide to buid a Time machine......
@RSwanson1972 You say, "Time itself does exit". I have to ask, in what shape or form does it exit in? Is there an element on the periodic table for it? I see what you are trying to say, but it breaks every law of physics in my book.
@RSwanson1972 Time exists as it's own entity. It cannot be seen or felt, but it has an effect on objects in the natural world. We cannot look out into space, without looking back in time.
And yes your right it's always day one to the universe. But I already said the way we as a species measure it is just made up. There are no days, months and years in the universe.
Meh... the Flying Spaghetti Monster got drunk from the nectar if heaven's beer volcano and created the entire universe in a drunken stupor... what else is there to know???
His noodliness was drunk when he made the universe, so OF COURSE things aren't going to work right!
@looncraz "Meh... the Flying Spaghetti Monster got drunk etc" You cheeky bugger! Are you implying that Richard Dawkins explanations of evolution are inconsistent with General Relativity??
hmmm. Everything i watch about time & space on anything always argue about relativity and quantum mechanics. sighhhhhhh... Time for my generation to find that shit out, im tired of it
Radiation never ends though, you just burn up, some black hole would just burn up in a big bang. So, if one does not exist even, there powerfuler thing exist. So, there is no bubble wrap. It's the motion of the particle cloud that makes a laser slower than a light ray. The flavors of things, like quantum numbers, are that hard, so they would be more delicious to extract.
@ftlqed you make absolutely no sense, and some of the things you claim are incorrect.
Laser moves no slower than light of the same wavelength - because the only difference between the two is that laser have all the fotons synchronised, and normal light does not.
The possibility that gamma rays might move slower than visible light, has nothing to do with lasers, only with wavelength. And the evidence soo far have come up negative or inconclusive. More research needed.
sorry..but space or time don't exist. space is abstract word the same as distance, time is an abstract way to measure how things get constantly rearranged in space..einstein was an idiot who could write math on blackboards, that's all.
I don't get the details, but this video says light and energy waves (gamma rays) can be affected by gravity or space/time but it cannot be slowed down by it?
@RasmusLastname No, I didn't think that, it was more of a typo - my girlfriend was going through chemo and my attention was split three ways at the time
@RasmusLastname most anal comment seen for a while, and considering they both act similarly in the double slit experiment its not that suprising someone might get confused. please don't be so demeaning to people who are trying to learn, it encourages people to give up when they could of done something great.
@NoLabels2009 So, would it not be weird to confuse say a cellphone with a chair? They both act similarly when dropped. The two particles are waaaaaaaaaay different. Mixing them up is actually a huge thing. Think of all the acids that look and seem to work just like water, and see if you can use the same argument for why it's no biggie to drink those acids. Bad argument, bad post.
@RasmusLastname you've missed the point spectacularly. not everyone has an immense amount of knowledge on such things, your telling me you could go up to someone at a bus stop and immediately bring up such things in a conversation? what im saying is rather than simply correct someone and hope they learnt from it you had to put "holy shit...." etc. why?? learning about such things may be a new interest of theirs, something they generally want to learn about and not be sneered at for getting wrong
The universe might just be a 4-d time and space axis in which standing still makes you go through time, but no space then when you get fast your starting to go along the other axis and you lose time but you gain space, this explains why when we go fast time goes slower.
ahaa are they really trying to communicate something that hardly anyone is able to even conceptualize what is the point i mean really? These things they are speaking of dont even exist its a misguided and ignorant interpretation of all the things you think are things.
@musk020 Matter from nowhere, energy also and where did DNA or information come from? These things must have come from outside our experience as everything needs a beginning. Right? No that is incorrect. Einstein postulated more than 10 dimensions.The Bible says God is spirit, no mass/acceleration, no time, no beginning. Too big for our 4 D brains, but a superior being on a different schedule, outside time, with a technology that some call magic answers every question. unless you have one
@longboardsrules Matter was created out of necessity, it was never "not there", it was just not in the dimension that we call "existence". "God" is just a name we have given to the parallel dimensions that created our own. That's probably what the big bang was. A collision of dimensions (where two laws from either dimension contradict each other on a mass scale). Does that mean we should run around killing in the name of that dimension?
@OMG "Matter out of necessity" We make to fill a need from matter. So matter was made out of necessity by who? Hawking said it just appeared. The Bible infers a greater technology. transmutation of something frm that dimen. to matter.
Humans kill but Jesus said I came to give life more abundantly, then he healed the sick, fed the poor, taught to love your enemies then humans killed him in a religious fever.
The big B is a theory with 1 vast prob. The Bible proves it's self by prophecy
@OMGMANTHEHARPOONS Are you sure that there was no prediction from the old testament about Jesus being born in Bethlehem and then called a Nazarene?
Two predictions might be luck, but how about I raise the odds by given you another 10?
you must have a pet "fairy tail", that you have read from your personnel experience. You don't make your choices out of emotion or here say, I'm sure. What prophecy did not come true? Which one? Name just one?
@longboardsrules When I say it was created out of necessity, I mean when our "dimension/universe/multiverse" was created, there was nothing to fill it, so nothingness became matter out of necessity to fill the void. Like flipping a coin, just because you can't see the heads side when the tails side is up doesn't mean the heads isn't there. You just have to turn it over to realize it exists.
@OMGMANTHEHARPOONS Are you saying something made it's self. Molecues, complex strings, even DNA just nade it's self. Is that what your saying? 0x0=0., cahos + energy = randomness, is taught in our universities except when the question genisis is broached. Your saying the vacume of deep space made planets? Is this an idea or do you have proof?
@longboardsrules I don't have any proof of anything but neither do you so your rebuttal is invalid. Of course DNA just makes itself. It's a chain reaction, one part of the DNA set's another part of the DNA up to set up another part of the sequence of DNA up. It's just cause and effect. Are you saying when you knock down dominoes god makes all those dominoes fall over because a complex reaction such as that can't exist based on the initial cause?
@OMGMANTHEHARPOONS you r saying chaos + energy = information, yet you know that if you transcribe DNA and put it in IBM or Macintosh format you will see detailed plans of eyes, heart, reproductive sys., etc. body info was written not by randomness but by a step by step process, but most people cannot comprehend the antithesis of random "sequence" Random sequence in design is makes nothing. Like going in room and throwing everything around to streighten up. If u think other give an example.
@OMGMANTHEHARPOONS rebuttal is invalid. Beg your pardon, but you have just cut off discussion because you are omniscient, you are always right, and your answeres are perfect. That's just fine except for the small fact that I already gave your a prophecy "Bethleham and called a Nazerine" which proves your humaness to error. That was a prodiction of a future event that is now history reaveling anything but an open mind and one who ascirbes to the scientific method. New data affects u not.
@longboardsrules..Quantum physics also tells us atoms[+subatomic] can be in a 1000 places at THE SAME TIME ! Do you believe that or not. MY view is it needs more data, more proof before I say believe of pain of death.
Remember their scientific motivation. We all want importance and wealth. We all tend to bend the data for personel gain.
@longboardsrules Yes, Hawkins said matter just "appeared"..you are right in saying this. Did you also know in the past few yrs. it has been scientifically discovered that whichever section of space you take [a cubic metre in your living room if you like] atoms pop into existence from the nothingness of space and then back again into nothingness ! You still think our universe can't come from nothing ?
@brindow1 r u talking about quantum string theory? You will agree mans greed for fame and $, surpasses morals. Every new thing a prof or researcher writes that makes some sense is bent towards current world view & rewarded. Evolu, Big B (something from nothing) are widely encouraged with billions of dollars. u r saying a controversial theory is fact as txt books teach abiogensis is fact, but what of the scientific method? Please no theory, but proof. u r too trusting, ur faith in man too grt!
@longboardsrules No I am not talking of string theory,that is simply a theory. I refer you back to my previous comment .. modern day technology allows you to observe particles to pop into existence from NOTHING ! I am too trusting you say ! Well, I do tend to accept what has been proved in the scientific community..how about you? Quantum physics also tells us atoms[+subatomic] can be in a 1000 places at THE SAME TIME ! Do you believe that or not?
@brindow1 I trust to a point. Hitler had his science comuity tell the Germ people lies about their superiority. Politicians seldom come up with what they promise. They lie. Drug manufactures are caught in fraud and made to recant their claims. Archaeol., evolution, have been documented falsifying their claims. Relig. professionals have had affairs with their constituents. What lie have you told recently? be honest. Then tell me you believe without proof. lyin is saying ur always honest
@longboardsrules Because we don't know the answer to everything doesn't prove God exists. After the discovery that the earth was round but before Newton's explanation of gravity, God was considered the reason things fell to the Earth, no other explanation made sense. You are no different in saying that because we don't yet understand everything that there most be a supernatural being that makes it all possible. BTW the 10 dimensions of string theory are considered possible and highly improbable.
@musk02000 We agree history is full of the close minded. It is men that error in theory of science with no data, political honesty, etc. Gravity & physics can only be from design(why things fall), here is why: Men c life arising from chaos+energy=info(sequenced DNA), but hold to the fact info must have authorship. Men c matter from nothing, ignoring the fact that we all believe-0*0=0. Bible predictions made history with no error, never failing, men don't believe, but cannot name 1 eror
hey hey..i honestly came up with the theory for everything one night when i was drunk. honest! i believed it and i thought .í dont need to write it down its so easy´ but i did forget it. but i do beleive i will work it out again.
Holy scriptures and love inside each human being and even in mankind as fact? look a bit to crop circles and think about white light playing in England after... after what?
Galaxies might already be revolving round the center of the universe at this point of time, may be sooner...once it reached enough distance form the center due to the bang. (once again, distance thrown away is directly proportional to the force at which the bang happend.)
I dont believe in Big Bang theory, there should be some other explanation.
How did all the stars, galaxies, panaets, dark matter, dark energy....(trillions of them)formed into tiny size (How much tiny?)before big bang.
Where did all the matter came from, before big bang?
I dont think universe will expand for ever, "this is equal to energy of the Bang", and stop expanding after that and start revolving round the center of universe, like any other planets like the earth to the sun, stars to the
@kempsdaman Have you heard of the theory of gravity? You should call BS on that one too and fall on your face. It is just a theory, no one really knows if you'll fall on your face.
Gravity waves from the big bang, collapsing into gravitation force particles as they enter the dark matter fields. The big bang radiation is microwaves. These different speeds of different light, is due to velocity within the bounds of the speed of light. I have been thinking that, perhaps this light speed limit is generated by stars that are slowing the speed limit down. Pre-Solar collision photons that could move faster than the star output lights speed limit.
@daedalusTV Space itself(i.e. universe expanding) can move faster than light. However, any particle moving through space cannot move faster than light.
Oh and i think the "Big bank theory" already says its possible to move faster than the speed of light cuz they said the universe formed in a matter of seconds.
Guess what, E=mc2 is WRONG! Einstein was wrong! Light speed is not the maximum speed possible. "Known by me before it was discovered in Tesla" Just ask me how i knew it, I just did.
I guess everyone's hear the latest breakthrough as of a few days ago saying time travel may be possible at least at a subatomic level.
I wonder if something I've stumbled across could open new doors in scientific research. If you follow my link to see my first upload "Witness a Miracle" you'll see what I'm talking about. The first few moments after it comes into focus are key to watch, and it easier to see full screen. I swear this footage is genuine. p.s I'm not selling anything.
Einstein gazed at an eclipse & observed light to have appeared to bend. However, the light didn't bend. But rather, that upon which light travels is what bent
Precisely as it was written since thousands of years prior to Einstein -
"he stretches the heavens, as one stretches the fabric of a tent"
Science is good but its the light slowed by rough terrain space & arrival takes much time. The Creator's word is the speedy light on a smooth highway & arrival may occur prior to departure
two major prolems with this disinformation, 1) Einstein's own E=mc2 proves that matter can, indeed MUST travel faster then the speed of light in order to become energy. therefore, there's no speed-limit. 2) comparing light particles (photons) to gamma particles is like comparing apples to bananas, they are two different things.
We know that the hypothesis for the God-Quantum Theory is within reach, this just shows how close we are getting to it. To think that Photons can travel faster than the speed of light is mind boggling.
Arclightunit 1 day ago
This has been flagged as spam show
How many Lies do you think you have told in your life? Have you ever stolen anything, even something small? Have you ever looked at a person with lust? Ever used GOD's name as a curse word? If so, GOD sees you as a Lying, thieving, blasphemous, adulterer at heart. The Guilty will end up in Hell. That's not GOD's will. You broke GOD's laws, but Jesus paid your fine! (IF) you Repent, and trust in Christ alone, GOD will forgive every sin you have ever committed, and grant you Eternal life!
EXALTEDDIRT 1 day ago
Why does it have to be space and time that slowed the photons down? couldnt the photons have passed through a nebula or dark matter?
CertifiedBad4ss 1 day ago
@CertifiedBad4ss I'm not trying to be an ass, but your comment shows a fundamental misunderstanding of physics and scale. I'm saying this as a student of physics, and having specifically studied particle physics and neutrinos for the past year. The idea that something larger than our solar system (i.e. a nebula) could affect something that can pass through the empty space of an atom at 299792458m/s (a photon) is silly, & (theoretical) dark matter doesn't interact with electromagnetism.
ScienceofWinning 1 day ago
@ScienceofWinning Well, light travels slower here on Earth (to my knowledge) because of the atmosphere, so why not a nebula or a some other "cloud".
And we know dark matter have mass, so it must have some effect on particles passing through. What does electromagnetism have to do with anything?
Btw typing the exact speed of light is being a smartass.
CertifiedBad4ss 1 day ago
@CertifiedBad4ss No, it's a very basic thing that all physicists have committed to memory. Electromagnetism matters because light (photons) is an electromagnetic wave, which is also common knowledge among scientists, particles act like waves in quantum mechanics. A net measurement of ALL photons traveling through Earth's atmosphere & gravitational influence reveals that ON AVERAGE they travel about 1m/s slower @ sea level. That's net, 99% of individual photons aren't affected. Connect the dots.
ScienceofWinning 1 day ago
@ScienceofWinning Particles act like particles in quantum mechanics. Photons on the other hand acts both as waves and particles. And when I looked up the speed of light in Earths atmosphere (cant remember that shit from when I was in high school) it was around 90000m/s less than in space, not 1m/s less.
Also according to your channel you have been studying particle physics and neutrinos since you were 17, youtube science shows =/= studying bro.
CertifiedBad4ss 1 day ago
@CertifiedBad4ss Actually, I'm doing a year long senior project on the behavior of neutrinos & have been privileged to study at collages around my area with many professors and other students of physics, as well as being the top of my class in AP senior physics at my high school. &, in fact, all standalone particles (ESPECIALLY bosons) behave like waves, which is why the Heisenburg uncertainty principle says what it says, & the point is, don't you think FERMI would have checked for the mundane?
ScienceofWinning 19 hours ago
@ScienceofWinning It's very likely they did, especially if a dumbass like me could spot it. My original question was if the photon couldn't have been slowed down like they do on Earth, because they never said anything about it in the video.
CertifiedBad4ss 9 hours ago
@CertifiedBad4ss Well, that's why they have a space telescope, so they don't even need much redundant compensation protocols, if any at all to account for atmospheric distortion. They probably didn't touch on it in the video because most people don't think scientifically, & wouldn't have even considered it.
ScienceofWinning 7 hours ago
you were wrong and Einstein was right.. waste of time.
newgle 2 days ago
honestly, here is something that I sorta dont get... what exactly tells scientists that nothing can go faster then the speed of light? I mean is there any real evidence that i missed or are they just assuming that?
myr576 2 days ago
@myr576 There is no evidence for speed higher than the speed of light . Mathematically and experimentally proven .
hldemi 2 days ago
@myr576
It is very simple to explain.
Just calculate how long light is traveling from sun to earth and you will see.
SKOBLAVI 2 days ago
@myr576 Well, a supernova (which explodes with more energy than our sun will in its entire life span) of a massive star, only expands at the speed of light. I'm not sure if there is some mathematical proof, but if that much force cant push particles beyond the speed of light, I doubt anything else can.
CertifiedBad4ss 1 day ago
@CertifiedBad4ss thankyou!
myr576 1 day ago
When i'm sober: LOLOLOL MINECRAFTZ! LOL COMEDYLOL FAMIlY GUY
When i'm drunk: Yes, quiet so space-time relativity. Philosophy, meaning of life.
BaxterXenon 2 days ago
@BaxterXenon Einstein was drunk 24/7
CertifiedBad4ss 1 day ago
Allah menghiasi langit terdekat (langit dunia, langit 1) dengan bintang-bintang. Langit ke 1 manusia tak mampu menjamah betapa luasnya. Apalagi langit ke 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, dan di atasnya ARSY. Satu hari di hadapan Allah sama dengan 1000 tahun dari tahun-tahun yang kamu hitung. From jokowi61@gamail.com
naAdaeLfieda 4 days ago
0:55 - the high-energy mysteries of our universe have been solved. There's too much energy in her lunchbox and it's not getting burnt off.
bored1980 6 days ago
This month's Scientifc American has an article about how spacetime may be digital.
eventhisidistaken 6 days ago
everyone knows light is made out of lucky charms....dang kids always stealin my lucky charms.....
bluetower11 1 week ago
Why are all scientists so terribly badly dressed? Is it because they're so busy solving the mysteries of the universe they forgot to look in the fucking mirror?
fishybishbash 1 week ago
Stop with the fucking hand god damnit. Every time we see you talk your elbow is stapled to your side and you wiggle your hand around like a retard.
PAC0SANCHEZ 1 week ago
Photons (which are tiny packets of light) have no mass, yet when you split one it breaks up into its individual particles (electrons & positrons which do have mass). Light was also the last force to break off in the big bang (137).
RiaRadioFMHD773 1 week ago
@RiaRadioFMHD773 uhm? Is this new research? Source? Every thing I read about this is that a photon is an elementary particle. That if you split an photon you get 2 photons who share the original energy.
And isn´t Photons packages of Energy, not light?
And Light isn´t a force. There are 4 forces. Electomagnetism (photons), Strong (gluon) -and weak nuclear force (W- and Z-boson), and gravity (unkown).
Masteradv 1 week ago
@RiaRadioFMHD773 "Splitting photons" does not create electron, positron pairs, it happens when a high energy photons such as gamma rays collide with a nucleus. The energy of the photon is converted to mass which is possible according to E=mc^2
cjs2964 3 days ago
ty pičo
MrDragonc4 1 week ago
Oh, these silly kids go on thinking that light is separate from space... Particles, farticles!
crazy8sdrums 2 weeks ago
Smooth!
SOUTHCREEKSOUND 2 weeks ago
isso e so pontinhos nos espaço..balaelas religiosas e ciencias..
verdadeomitida 2 weeks ago
blrblrlblrbllbllrlrblrbrlblrbl pause blrlrlblrblrlblrlblrblrlbrlb
DimmishLighting 2 weeks ago
If light was made up of electrons, penis would then be producing eggs and vagina will then be producing sperms.
polarspirit 2 weeks ago
@polarspirit Where do people come up with such stupid, vulgar comments?
aluisious 2 weeks ago
@aluisious It's just Biology, Christ!
polarspirit 2 weeks ago
Very good infornmation in this video!
Alpha6059 2 weeks ago
I have been waiting for this info and so glad it is posted here.
AlgisKemezys 2 weeks ago
Please...could you translate these videos???...or just subtitles... I don't speak english. And think all this information is very interesting. Thank you-
22jaset 3 weeks ago in playlist Más vídeos de SpaceRip
Going back to the analogy of the speedboat, Lets say they were both in the same water. Would the one cause a wake that slows the other down?
scott22v 3 weeks ago
@scott22v No.. because in there wouldn't be anything to cause that "wake". -_-! Unless you factor in gravity.
Windbringer 3 weeks ago
read this blog, it has very interesting thoughts about space and beyond theorycompo.blogspot.c om/
Fix the "com"
xlactyu15 4 weeks ago
Maybe they can't merge the two theories because one causes the other to happen; a domino effect, morphing strong forces, weak forces and gravitational dominance into what we understand and witness as The Quantum Realm, where Quark formations and other sub atomic structures evolve into "other", newer forms of matter that behave unlike it's parental origins. Just sayin.
hartistry1957 4 weeks ago
I will give it another 50 years
REDXJeenKs30000 1 month ago
Einstein is history his theory finaly proved to be wrong.The LHC project wiped out Einstein almost entirely from physics
Androsstudio 1 month ago
@Androsstudio No it didn't...
Wow, it's people like you that make Science look bad. The LHC simply recorded a subatomic particle (I believe a positron), moving faster than the speed of light. It is still unconfirmed, and has yet to be peer reviewed. Moreoever, that was only one aspect of Einsteins theory. I bet you can't even name which one? :) lmao read a book.
Haseeebo 1 month ago
@Haseeebo no it's not about positron you small brat brain it is neutrinos.Neutrinos laugh in Einstein face.Newton kicked Einstein ass pretty ugly, all atoms in the universe are bound so information travels faster then the speed of light and LHC proved another thing that even a particle can travel faster then light ,the other theory E=mc^2 it not belong to Einstein that reality was known before Einstein.The only thing Einstein did is steal this idea and after that they made atomic bomb.Cowards
Androsstudio 1 month ago
@Androsstudio Actually there are many theories which already were expecting to measure particles which seem to be faster than light. And the fact that they (maybe) measured something like that doesnt prove Einstein wrong. It actually fits very well into Einstein theory. The Neutrinos just took some shorter way through a Hyperspace. So they traveled with the speed of light, but along a shorter way. From our point of view it looks like they moved faster than the speed of light.
PlayOrZ 1 month ago
@Androsstudio are u a fking retard? newton's laws are all right until they reach the extremes. Einstein proved that newtons dont apply in extreme situations ( such as the speed of light). And that story of einstein stealing e=mc^2 is fake. trust me bro, e=mc^2 is not the only theory einstein did.
XxIshxXCwalk 3 weeks ago
@Androsstudio and wtf? information has no speed.. if it did after a certain distance, it wud take time to process.. so that means information has no speed
XxIshxXCwalk 3 weeks ago
@Androsstudio and mark oliver invented the atom bomb.. look him up
XxIshxXCwalk 3 weeks ago
@Haseeebo it think it was a neutrino
XxIshxXCwalk 3 weeks ago
I invite all to participate in a resolution of Time and Space concepts.
xjpzzz 1 month ago
"The Beadlingism of Matter" is a hypothesis beging with a definition of Time; Time is the measurement of the transition perion between two distinct events. And explicably tied to the transition period over which the events transpired. Without a clear understanding of what time is, you cannot compare how it equates to another concept.
xjpzzz 1 month ago
i came to see the space not ligth
MEXICANO0311 1 month ago
Once again, scientists got overeager about some tiny bit of data and that gives them such a big head as to think they are smarter than Einstein , but once again they're proven wrong and Einstein is still proven right. Moral of the story? Don't fuck with Jews.
Tecanuva 1 month ago
The answer - truly lies in the stars? Once again, the Truth is NOW and the nature of NOW is to be "different".
newagecozaki 1 month ago
i belive there is a speed faster then light, the speed of time, this however could not be broken but is indeed faster then the speed of light, traveling close to the speed of time would be teleportation
Nr2reaper 1 month ago
@Nr2reaper speed of time? That's paradoxical m8!
newagecozaki 1 month ago
@Nr2reaper You don't know anything. You cannot be taken seriously.
Gunner3210 1 month ago
why is he standing so werid?
stdfreesteve 1 month ago
WELL howdy mr spaceRip you seem like a intelligent person so can I ask you what you think about crystal "superalinement" ? WFR
58NIEL 1 month ago
is there anyone uot there about C=0 ? please
58NIEL 1 month ago
AGAIN what if the speed of light (C=(aprox.) 300000KPS isactually C=0 HA HA seeing EINSTEIN said all speeds (velocitys) are relative and the speed of light does not seem to be relative ?
58NIEL 1 month ago
what if C=0 ? seeing Einstain I belive said all velocitys are relative and the speed of light seems not
58NIEL 1 month ago
@58NIEL The speed of light is c from ALL inertial reference frames. This is the fundamental idea in Einstein's theory of special relativity.
Gunner3210 1 month ago
Get your thumb out of your pocket you fruit cup >_>
doodelay 1 month ago
I come true using own self all over the world. Extended desire to fill up forever, I jump out and transcend reality. My own self has almighty power of all life time and does it from 16 years old again. Return to past. To save father.
自身を使って世界中で実現して行く。何処までも埋め尽くす拡大欲求、現実を飛び出し超越する。自身に人生全時期全能力が有り16歳からやり直す。過去に戻り父を救う為に。
wizardmori 1 month ago
I think my life's goal that it is in a certain meaning to do regenerative medicine from bone marrow transplantation, believe there was even the life that can open. I come back in the past and save father.
骨髄移植から再生医療をやる事こそが或る意味で人生の目標、其処から開ける人生さえあったと思う。過去に戻ってでも父を救うんだ。
Self comes true using own positively in the world. All memory revives vividly in history; revive. All recorded in the life revives; revive.
積極的に自身を使って世界に実現していく。史上全ての記憶が鮮やかに蘇る甦る。人生に記録されている全てが甦る蘇る。
wizardmori 1 month ago
"Science is a process of elimination" - So true. Should have been followed with "Religion is a process of making up dumb answers when you run into problems".
regiraver 1 month ago
"Probing the fundamental nature of space and time."
Humans are awesome.
elatus 1 month ago
@elatus its ture :D we are, what other species on this planet even comes close to that....none. we are vey special indeed :)
sosolidvampire 1 month ago
woah woah woah...900 ms is no delay? she says there is a 900 ms delay and then she says there was no delay. WTF? so scientific readings are only accurate to within ~1 second and they are trying to measure the speed of light like that? I know that's not true so obviously what this lady is saying is bullcrap
HTSGOSU 2 months ago
@HTSGOSU Clearly you don't understand physics or this video. 900 ms out of 7 billion years is, yes, nothing. Further, it challenges the theory that there is a 'texture' to space-time that would interfere with high energy particles and lends support to the theory that space-time is indeed smooth. Einstein was right again.
ianman6 1 month ago
Truly lie, he says... lol
950horsepower 2 months ago
the ap published a report saying that a group of scientist observed a neutrino heading faster then the speed of light. if this is found to be true, then the way the world we live in is viewed will be forever changed.
Ssddftw 2 months ago
It's like having your lenses refract from looking at a single point to looking at the part of a bigger whole...your eyes suddenly blurs...that's what happens with the brain I suppose...the length of ti9me between refraction and focusing has a train of thought that should not be interrupted to produce theories I propose.
bg591979 2 months ago
Infinite smallness and infinite largeness...we just can't visualize the distance between the quarks and the space bubbles...thus inhibiting a theory of all...
bg591979 2 months ago
@AngeloNiklis That's correct. Light is able to be affected by gravity. As an example, when a photon come close to something very heavy (lets say a galaxy) the photon will be "pulled" towards the galaxy, and when it has passed the galaxy the photon will have a slightly different course.
When the photon is heading away from the galaxy it still wont slow down even though the galaxy is trying to pull it back towards itself, because (according to Einstein) the speed of light is constant in vacuum
ragazoor 2 months ago
@ragazoor I agree
58NIEL 1 month ago
yea lights no longer the fastest, neutrinos beat in CERN it in 2011. Einstein is incorrect, quantum craziness lives on
blackwolfsquadron 2 months ago
nassim haramein already did the unification field thoery....
FarmingFreak 2 months ago
there is no such thing as time, only motion....all moving forward thru space...if we were fourth dimensional beings, all the movement we see would occur simultanously as one big pulsating, flowing object...perhaps the universe is a giant jellyfish and we are the blood cells rushing thru the veins..some day to coalesce into a protein amino-acid configuration and be ejaculated into anther JF Universe thru a white or black hole....that's my Gooey theory...:D...we are going out forever.....nowhere
lanagual 2 months ago
Completely throw away self! Lead to the acme of the intoxication indulgence! Fill up! Ideal realization! The materialization of ideal own! I am unification union finish completion form!
完全に自己を捨て去れ！！陶酔耽溺の極致に至れ！！埋め尽くせ！！理想の実現！！理想の自身の実体化！！完成！合一！一体化！！
wizardmori 2 months ago
susan boyle is a scientist!!!
mattyboy7071 2 months ago
Wow, so you presented a theory that was already proven wrong, way to waste my time. While I'm at it, HEY GUYS! DID YOU KNOW THAT IT'S POSSIBLE THAT THE EARTH IS FLAT!?!? But it's not...
ManlyMcBuff 2 months ago
Comment removed
xhemexx 2 months ago
I am sick and tire of hearing space and time being associated with each other. "Time" is only a measurement of figmentation of a human's mind or just realitivity. It will always be day one according to the universe and if you lived on Pluto, which takes about 248 yrs to orbit the sun, you would never have a birthday. If anyone is intereated in building a time machine, good-luck with telling the universe what time it is...LOL
RSwanson1972 2 months ago
@RSwanson1972 I nteat this comment to be wise and weighty in fact......Time is only relative to procesess......hence the slower a human ages the faster he moves through space: And the further he moves from planet earth. It was the specail thoery of relativity that properly quantified time with its relative speed between observers and procesess. Like the pluto comment...
bcvirus20101 2 months ago
@RSwanson1972
That's stupid. Time IS a dimension we move through at the speed of light. If that wasnt so--there would no such thing as light years--all galaxies in the sky would be seen as they actually are cause LS would be infinite . If time moved faster than light then when you turned on a light it may take a while b4 you SEE it. We could not operate in that world.
God set our motion through time with Light so we see things on earth WHEN they happen..Not b4 or after.
Rizzy55 2 months ago
@Rizzy55 Nope! It's smart! Where are you getting these foolish non-facts? Moreover, I'm speaking of "Time" and the non-essence of it. You are getting of the subject, when going into speed of light. I think you mean "Objects" and not "Light"; however, they are both matter, and when matter is in motion, we call it "Energy". There are infinite dimensions and something always make-up somthing. Like I said, '"Time" is only a measurement of realativity of a human's mind"'. Please leave "God" out.
RSwanson1972 1 month ago
@RSwanson1972
I am sick and tire of hearing space and time being associated with each other. "Time" is only a measurement of figmentation of a human's mind or just realitivity. It will always be day one according to the universe and if you lived on Pluto, which takes about 248 yrs to orbit the sun, you would never have a birthday.
HAHA. No, idiot know it all.
The study of time has nothing to do with earths orbit or the calendar. Why do so many fools shout stupidity with such arrogance?
Rizzy55 2 months ago
@Rizzy55 LOL! You don't know who you are talking to - idiot! Those were just an enologies. You cannot study "Time". Because, our 5 senses cannot detect something that does not exist, but only in relativity. As an example, a house-fly see all things in slow motion, when compared to the speed of motion we preceive. We also live in the past in nano-seconds. Because, by the time light enter your eyes and registers by your little brain, it's already the past. Therefore, no-one lives in the present.
RSwanson1972 1 month ago
@RSwanson1972 Yes time is relative. That's why it's called general relativity.
But time is an actually thing. If there was no such thing as "time" every event from the beginning of the universe, until the end, would happen all at once.
Days, months, and years are all man-made labels that we came up with so we can have some way of relating to any given "time." But time itself does exist.
aPpLeJuIcE37RainLucy 1 week ago
@aPpLeJuIcE37RainLucy Perception is a funny thing when comparing flies VS humams. As flies see speed of light at a different rate than humans do. Meaning that the duraion of "Time" perceived is much prolonged for a fly, than human perception of "Time". This is why it is deficult to slap a fly, as they see many more frams per second. In other-words, it is up to the brain to determine how fast something is preceived. So, keep in mind, if you ever decide to buid a Time machine......
RSwanson1972 6 days ago
@RSwanson1972 ...con't...good-luck telling the Universe what time it is, as it is always day one, according to the Universe. =)
RSwanson1972 6 days ago
@RSwanson1972 You say, "Time itself does exit". I have to ask, in what shape or form does it exit in? Is there an element on the periodic table for it? I see what you are trying to say, but it breaks every law of physics in my book.
RSwanson1972 6 days ago
@RSwanson1972 Time exists as it's own entity. It cannot be seen or felt, but it has an effect on objects in the natural world. We cannot look out into space, without looking back in time.
And yes your right it's always day one to the universe. But I already said the way we as a species measure it is just made up. There are no days, months and years in the universe.
aPpLeJuIcE37RainLucy 6 days ago
@aPpLeJuIcE37RainLucy well maybe I shouldn't say "effect," but more like a property.
aPpLeJuIcE37RainLucy 6 days ago
fucking shit milions of dolar and 10 minutes of my life to learn what? that they dont know nothing new
ohujaly 2 months ago
Meh... the Flying Spaghetti Monster got drunk from the nectar if heaven's beer volcano and created the entire universe in a drunken stupor... what else is there to know???
His noodliness was drunk when he made the universe, so OF COURSE things aren't going to work right!
looncraz 2 months ago
@looncraz "Meh... the Flying Spaghetti Monster got drunk etc" You cheeky bugger! Are you implying that Richard Dawkins explanations of evolution are inconsistent with General Relativity??
bobinhk1 2 months ago
hmmm. Everything i watch about time & space on anything always argue about relativity and quantum mechanics. sighhhhhhh... Time for my generation to find that shit out, im tired of it
Rhodsie82 2 months ago
Thumbs up if you discovered something new about the fabric of space-time. Siiiiiiiighhhhh!!!!!
bobinhk1 2 months ago
Lol, she ran out of breath aot. :P
DustinFarleyTV 2 months ago
Thumbs up if you remember from schools that gamma-ray burst supernovas are also called "hypernovas"!!! =D
chikiwiki64 2 months ago 2
Radiation never ends though, you just burn up, some black hole would just burn up in a big bang. So, if one does not exist even, there powerfuler thing exist. So, there is no bubble wrap. It's the motion of the particle cloud that makes a laser slower than a light ray. The flavors of things, like quantum numbers, are that hard, so they would be more delicious to extract.
ftlqed 2 months ago
@ftlqed you make absolutely no sense, and some of the things you claim are incorrect.
Laser moves no slower than light of the same wavelength - because the only difference between the two is that laser have all the fotons synchronised, and normal light does not.
The possibility that gamma rays might move slower than visible light, has nothing to do with lasers, only with wavelength. And the evidence soo far have come up negative or inconclusive. More research needed.
MagnusNyborg 2 months ago
sorry..but space or time don't exist. space is abstract word the same as distance, time is an abstract way to measure how things get constantly rearranged in space..einstein was an idiot who could write math on blackboards, that's all.
ZeroHumans 2 months ago
@ZeroHumans because i dont understand all this bullshit im going with your theory.:)
MastaBlastaS99 2 months ago
gravity and gluons are one in the same... <3<3<3
TripleXstcy 2 months ago
I don't get the details, but this video says light and energy waves (gamma rays) can be affected by gravity or space/time but it cannot be slowed down by it?
AngeloNiklis 2 months ago
SOSt most people are dumb!
Blackybigw 3 months ago
@Blackybigw And you are proof of that
johnmcmns199 3 months ago
you should go into MORE DETAIL. We aren't as dumb as you might think. I'm sure we can handle the information overload, lol.
SOSTacoJohnson 3 months ago
Those two electrons traveled all that way and all that time, only to be captured by humans?!? Free those electrons NOW!
Spikebert 3 months ago 27
@Spikebert ..............photons. :)
XxWearsMexX 1 month ago 5
@Spikebert Photons, not electrons. Holy shit, you thought light was made of electrons?
RasmusLastname 1 month ago 46
@RasmusLastname No, I didn't think that, it was more of a typo - my girlfriend was going through chemo and my attention was split three ways at the time
Spikebert 1 month ago
@RasmusLastname most anal comment seen for a while, and considering they both act similarly in the double slit experiment its not that suprising someone might get confused. please don't be so demeaning to people who are trying to learn, it encourages people to give up when they could of done something great.
NoLabels2009 1 week ago
@NoLabels2009 So, would it not be weird to confuse say a cellphone with a chair? They both act similarly when dropped. The two particles are waaaaaaaaaay different. Mixing them up is actually a huge thing. Think of all the acids that look and seem to work just like water, and see if you can use the same argument for why it's no biggie to drink those acids. Bad argument, bad post.
RasmusLastname 1 week ago
@RasmusLastname But if you describe the orbits of planets miscalling them farts it's still great. Not a baddie, a really goodie.
raydredX 6 days ago
@RasmusLastname you've missed the point spectacularly. not everyone has an immense amount of knowledge on such things, your telling me you could go up to someone at a bus stop and immediately bring up such things in a conversation? what im saying is rather than simply correct someone and hope they learnt from it you had to put "holy shit...." etc. why?? learning about such things may be a new interest of theirs, something they generally want to learn about and not be sneered at for getting wrong
NoLabels2009 3 days ago
@RasmusLastname No, wrong. Electric current (in conducting materials) is made out of electrons. Not light.
kyaume21 3 days ago
The universe might just be a 4-d time and space axis in which standing still makes you go through time, but no space then when you get fast your starting to go along the other axis and you lose time but you gain space, this explains why when we go fast time goes slower.
TheBaldchipmunk 3 months ago
So what's the NEW discovery?
Just sounds like yet another experiment that confirms Einstein's theories.
frazzzer8888 3 months ago
ahaa are they really trying to communicate something that hardly anyone is able to even conceptualize what is the point i mean really? These things they are speaking of dont even exist its a misguided and ignorant interpretation of all the things you think are things.
THErickuss 3 months ago
@musk020 Matter from nowhere, energy also and where did DNA or information come from? These things must have come from outside our experience as everything needs a beginning. Right? No that is incorrect. Einstein postulated more than 10 dimensions.The Bible says God is spirit, no mass/acceleration, no time, no beginning. Too big for our 4 D brains, but a superior being on a different schedule, outside time, with a technology that some call magic answers every question. unless you have one
longboardsrules 3 months ago
@longboardsrules Matter was created out of necessity, it was never "not there", it was just not in the dimension that we call "existence". "God" is just a name we have given to the parallel dimensions that created our own. That's probably what the big bang was. A collision of dimensions (where two laws from either dimension contradict each other on a mass scale). Does that mean we should run around killing in the name of that dimension?
It is not conscious, living, or male or female.
It just is.
OMGMANTHEHARPOONS 3 months ago
@OMG "Matter out of necessity" We make to fill a need from matter. So matter was made out of necessity by who? Hawking said it just appeared. The Bible infers a greater technology. transmutation of something frm that dimen. to matter.
Humans kill but Jesus said I came to give life more abundantly, then he healed the sick, fed the poor, taught to love your enemies then humans killed him in a religious fever.
The big B is a theory with 1 vast prob. The Bible proves it's self by prophecy
longboardsrules 3 months ago
@longboardsrules Never ever once has the bible proved itself to be true. Ever. Once. Ever. At all. No.
The bible is a book of fairy tales taken too seriously by people who overlook the deeper morals.
OMGMANTHEHARPOONS 3 months ago
@OMGMANTHEHARPOONS Are you sure that there was no prediction from the old testament about Jesus being born in Bethlehem and then called a Nazarene?
Two predictions might be luck, but how about I raise the odds by given you another 10?
you must have a pet "fairy tail", that you have read from your personnel experience. You don't make your choices out of emotion or here say, I'm sure. What prophecy did not come true? Which one? Name just one?
longboardsrules 3 months ago
@longboardsrules When I say it was created out of necessity, I mean when our "dimension/universe/multiverse" was created, there was nothing to fill it, so nothingness became matter out of necessity to fill the void. Like flipping a coin, just because you can't see the heads side when the tails side is up doesn't mean the heads isn't there. You just have to turn it over to realize it exists.
OMGMANTHEHARPOONS 3 months ago
@OMGMANTHEHARPOONS Are you saying something made it's self. Molecues, complex strings, even DNA just nade it's self. Is that what your saying? 0x0=0., cahos + energy = randomness, is taught in our universities except when the question genisis is broached. Your saying the vacume of deep space made planets? Is this an idea or do you have proof?
longboardsrules 3 months ago
@longboardsrules I don't have any proof of anything but neither do you so your rebuttal is invalid. Of course DNA just makes itself. It's a chain reaction, one part of the DNA set's another part of the DNA up to set up another part of the sequence of DNA up. It's just cause and effect. Are you saying when you knock down dominoes god makes all those dominoes fall over because a complex reaction such as that can't exist based on the initial cause?
OMGMANTHEHARPOONS 3 months ago
@OMGMANTHEHARPOONS you r saying chaos + energy = information, yet you know that if you transcribe DNA and put it in IBM or Macintosh format you will see detailed plans of eyes, heart, reproductive sys., etc. body info was written not by randomness but by a step by step process, but most people cannot comprehend the antithesis of random "sequence" Random sequence in design is makes nothing. Like going in room and throwing everything around to streighten up. If u think other give an example.
longboardsrules 3 months ago
@OMGMANTHEHARPOONS rebuttal is invalid. Beg your pardon, but you have just cut off discussion because you are omniscient, you are always right, and your answeres are perfect. That's just fine except for the small fact that I already gave your a prophecy "Bethleham and called a Nazerine" which proves your humaness to error. That was a prodiction of a future event that is now history reaveling anything but an open mind and one who ascirbes to the scientific method. New data affects u not.
longboardsrules 3 months ago
@longboardsrules..Quantum physics also tells us atoms[+subatomic] can be in a 1000 places at THE SAME TIME ! Do you believe that or not. MY view is it needs more data, more proof before I say believe of pain of death.
Remember their scientific motivation. We all want importance and wealth. We all tend to bend the data for personel gain.
longboardsrules 3 months ago
@longboardsrules Yes, Hawkins said matter just "appeared"..you are right in saying this. Did you also know in the past few yrs. it has been scientifically discovered that whichever section of space you take [a cubic metre in your living room if you like] atoms pop into existence from the nothingness of space and then back again into nothingness ! You still think our universe can't come from nothing ?
brindow1 3 months ago
@brindow1 r u talking about quantum string theory? You will agree mans greed for fame and $, surpasses morals. Every new thing a prof or researcher writes that makes some sense is bent towards current world view & rewarded. Evolu, Big B (something from nothing) are widely encouraged with billions of dollars. u r saying a controversial theory is fact as txt books teach abiogensis is fact, but what of the scientific method? Please no theory, but proof. u r too trusting, ur faith in man too grt!
longboardsrules 3 months ago
@longboardsrules No I am not talking of string theory,that is simply a theory. I refer you back to my previous comment .. modern day technology allows you to observe particles to pop into existence from NOTHING ! I am too trusting you say ! Well, I do tend to accept what has been proved in the scientific community..how about you? Quantum physics also tells us atoms[+subatomic] can be in a 1000 places at THE SAME TIME ! Do you believe that or not?
brindow1 3 months ago
@brindow1 I trust to a point. Hitler had his science comuity tell the Germ people lies about their superiority. Politicians seldom come up with what they promise. They lie. Drug manufactures are caught in fraud and made to recant their claims. Archaeol., evolution, have been documented falsifying their claims. Relig. professionals have had affairs with their constituents. What lie have you told recently? be honest. Then tell me you believe without proof. lyin is saying ur always honest
longboardsrules 3 months ago
@longboardsrules Because we don't know the answer to everything doesn't prove God exists. After the discovery that the earth was round but before Newton's explanation of gravity, God was considered the reason things fell to the Earth, no other explanation made sense. You are no different in saying that because we don't yet understand everything that there most be a supernatural being that makes it all possible. BTW the 10 dimensions of string theory are considered possible and highly improbable.
musk02000 3 months ago
@musk02000 We agree history is full of the close minded. It is men that error in theory of science with no data, political honesty, etc. Gravity & physics can only be from design(why things fall), here is why: Men c life arising from chaos+energy=info(sequenced DNA), but hold to the fact info must have authorship. Men c matter from nothing, ignoring the fact that we all believe-0*0=0. Bible predictions made history with no error, never failing, men don't believe, but cannot name 1 eror
longboardsrules 3 months ago
hey hey..i honestly came up with the theory for everything one night when i was drunk. honest! i believed it and i thought .í dont need to write it down its so easy´ but i did forget it. but i do beleive i will work it out again.
gewizz2 3 months ago
@gewizz2 Bear is good God is great. That's mine too.
longboardsrules 3 months ago
time to space
croidspoinker 3 months ago 17
Ein(K = 19.? a m En)?
Speed of light and censored Pipan,...?
Holy scriptures and love inside each human being and even in mankind as fact? look a bit to crop circles and think about white light playing in England after... after what?
KLMNOQPiPan 3 months ago
i want to jump on that bubble wrap so badly.
Fluffybreadface 3 months ago
i am the one who usually doesn't get it , thanks for the explanation.
kimmore2 3 months ago
tem legenda para portugues?
MrCarlei 3 months ago in playlist assistir depois 5
Galaxies might already be revolving round the center of the universe at this point of time, may be sooner...once it reached enough distance form the center due to the bang. (once again, distance thrown away is directly proportional to the force at which the bang happend.)
GK007001 3 months ago
I dont believe in Big Bang theory, there should be some other explanation.
How did all the stars, galaxies, panaets, dark matter, dark energy....(trillions of them)formed into tiny size (How much tiny?)before big bang.
Where did all the matter came from, before big bang?
I dont think universe will expand for ever, "this is equal to energy of the Bang", and stop expanding after that and start revolving round the center of universe, like any other planets like the earth to the sun, stars to the
GK007001 3 months ago
@GK007001 thats why its a theory because nobody knows.
kempsdaman 3 months ago
@kempsdaman Have you heard of the theory of gravity? You should call BS on that one too and fall on your face. It is just a theory, no one really knows if you'll fall on your face.
musk02000 3 months ago
@musk02000 lol
kempsdaman 3 months ago
Gravity waves from the big bang, collapsing into gravitation force particles as they enter the dark matter fields. The big bang radiation is microwaves. These different speeds of different light, is due to velocity within the bounds of the speed of light. I have been thinking that, perhaps this light speed limit is generated by stars that are slowing the speed limit down. Pre-Solar collision photons that could move faster than the star output lights speed limit.
q7spiz 3 months ago
Yay im learning something new!! oh wait... uploaded in 2009... shit...
zctop2 3 months ago 41
@zctop2 more new than most school books statistics from the 90s! BS :3
tjinga2u1 2 months ago
so Einstein mad mistake? we can go faster then the light!! woooow all will change now
pulsare21 3 months ago
thats cool and all but i stayed in a holiday in express last night :P
donnyt12915 3 months ago
Didn't the CERN people recently find faster than light particles or something.
1step1up 4 months ago
@1step1up yea it was a reedit post
flamingpolarstar 4 months ago
@flamingpolarstar
Yea I found it now but I still think Tesla was right.....
1step1up 4 months ago
@1step1up ya
flamingpolarstar 3 months ago
@daedalusTV Space itself(i.e. universe expanding) can move faster than light. However, any particle moving through space cannot move faster than light.
blahblah0715 4 months ago
Oh and i think the "Big bank theory" already says its possible to move faster than the speed of light cuz they said the universe formed in a matter of seconds.
DaedalusTV 4 months ago
Guess what, E=mc2 is WRONG! Einstein was wrong! Light speed is not the maximum speed possible. "Known by me before it was discovered in Tesla" Just ask me how i knew it, I just did.
DaedalusTV 4 months ago
Tesla Found Faster then Light Particles!
1step1up 4 months ago
Speaking too fast, this isn't sports.
MucusFelidae 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I guess everyone's hear the latest breakthrough as of a few days ago saying time travel may be possible at least at a subatomic level.
I wonder if something I've stumbled across could open new doors in scientific research. If you follow my link to see my first upload "Witness a Miracle" you'll see what I'm talking about. The first few moments after it comes into focus are key to watch, and it easier to see full screen. I swear this footage is genuine. p.s I'm not selling anything.
veracityfilms 4 months ago
Einstein gazed at an eclipse & observed light to have appeared to bend. However, the light didn't bend. But rather, that upon which light travels is what bent
Precisely as it was written since thousands of years prior to Einstein -
"he stretches the heavens, as one stretches the fabric of a tent"
Science is good but its the light slowed by rough terrain space & arrival takes much time. The Creator's word is the speedy light on a smooth highway & arrival may occur prior to departure
Chuichupachichi 4 months ago
two major prolems with this disinformation, 1) Einstein's own E=mc2 proves that matter can, indeed MUST travel faster then the speed of light in order to become energy. therefore, there's no speed-limit. 2) comparing light particles (photons) to gamma particles is like comparing apples to bananas, they are two different things.
TruthseekerYgg 4 months ago
@TruthseekerYgg
{Einstein's E=mc2 proves that matter can, indeed MUST travel faster then the speed of light in order to become energy}
Then how do you explain the process of when you eat food (matter) that is converted into energy. Organisms die & convert into energy
{comparing light particles (photons) to gamma particles is like comparing apples to bananas, they are two different things}
No they're not. The video explains at 2:40 that gamma & visible light are both electromagnetic radiation
Chuichupachichi 4 months ago