Added: 1 year ago
From: UCtelevision
Views: 12,326
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (61)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Excellent presentation. I appreciate the Professor's honesty in admitting our limitations and not seem as if we are certain on these things. Our knowledge is ever changing and what we know in 100 hundred years will be different than it is today. That's 1 thing we are certain of. Science, through history, has constantly been revised generation after generation in the light of new discoveries, and rightfully so. That's what science is. Each generation's knowledge will be surpassed. Ours will be 2.

  • I have a question about neutrinos supposedly gaining mass when they travel faster than the speed of light. I know very little of physics but what I do know is mass is usually decreased with speed. It seems to me that just because a particle is doing something that is opposite of what is expected...faster than speed of light, it has an opposite effect...gaining mass. So much more could be happening than gaining mass or loosing energy. Are there any theories on this? Thanks!

  • excellent work and excellent speaker

  • • SandustanBrasov

    It say: with the exception of the Higgs boson all the predicted particles of Standard Model were detected and the them properties were measured with precision. The Standard Model of particles to arrived let be verified, but, if the Higgs boson is not finded, then the Standard Model and the others models will be necessary to be reconstruct from zero.

  • i just got home from school a while ago after learning about this stuff in biology. :' ) oh youtube, i knew you werent just filled with weird shows, anime and poptart cats <3 im so glad i got a more indepth idea of the Higgs Boson

  • I would say that mass is what a particle looks like. How it is formed, its geometry, how complex it looks. Of course we cannot observe it, because there are no tools to take a picture of a particle.

    In order to get a particle, you have to twist space itself (see SLAC experiment). So complexity and size of a particle results in a certain mass.

    There is no higgs field required. But the point particle is the wrong imagination to understand mass.

  • Because a particle that is a point, actually cannot have a -real- mass anyway. So after the LHC comes with good evidence that there is NO higgs, the science community should extend the point particle model with formulas, that add two things:

    "geometrical complexity" and "size"

  • Only when Socialism rules supreme will countries become advanced enough to make MAJOR breakthroughs!

  • @madjimms go forth and multiply...we will pay for it...

  • Dont bring politics into it.

  • @beastinblack I sincerely hope you're joking.

  • What Gives Particles Mass? Searching for Higgs Boson is needed vacuum So vacuum gives mass to particles First question: What is vacuum ? The Vacuum is the lowest background level of Energy E= 0 and temperature T= 0K If Vacuum is some kind of Energetic Space then particles there are energetic particles Dirac named them : virtual particles Second question: Which parameters can they have in T=0K ? Third question: How can these virtual particles become real particles ?
  • Who is paying for this? , while people are starving in africa ?

  • At about 10 TeV, they should see figments of their imagination colliding.

  • What I wouldn't give just to be the janitor at LHC and live inside a Sci-Fi novel.

  • check out the cern channel here at youtube. the lhc is going to be modified in 2011, like it was after the stop in 2010, so the experiments are on hold. it was decided in th meeting in chamonix which was referred to in the lecture.

  • The real mystery here is how so many physicists can be so thick headed. The standard model is so wrong they have to balance 95% of universe with inventions, dark matter and dark energy and black holes to get it to work; while this should have told them just how wrong the theory was. Now another invention, the Higgs boson.

    Watch Youtube: Cosmology in crisis-and 5 minutes later you'll understand it is an electric universe, no inventions neccessary.

    PS -Sun is not fusion (see any mushrooms?)

  • @Zendout1 Fission is mushrooms <_< not fusion, just pointing that out for you.

  • @sciencemile even then, "mushrooms" would come from an exponential reaction, in a controlled reaction, like the proposed reaction in the sun, and what is maintained in nuclear reactors (fission of course), no explosion, no mushroom.

  • @Zendout1 Plasma theory has many problems...

  • @Zendout1 how come this video is not from partner? is it copied? is it from an author, if this is really as good as you say we gotta hear the policy of the author about the spreading of his video.

  • this is really appreciated. i have honestly been wondering how light can have mass and thus be effected by gravity, yet travel at the speed of light and thus due to relativity travel through time very slowly. i suspect i do not explain my query well, but i am not a physicist and as i learned about relativity this particular question really vexed me. i hope as i watch the program my question is answered!

  • @jeremysaint

    I don't see the problem really, if gravity is curved space-time.

  • @jeremysaint Light does not have mass.

  • @jeremysaint Light has no mass. The particles that light is made up of are called photons and they are massless particles. Massless particles only travel at the speed of light. They are affected by gravity because according to Einstein, gravity is simply warps and curves in the geometry of space-time, and these warps and curves affect the propagation of light and anything that passes through.

  • @jeremysaint I haven't even started watching the video but....

    Light has no mass.

    Gravity distorts space and time. The greater the mass the greater the distortion.

    Light is not exactly affected by gravity but the space it is on is.

    I don't know enough about GRelativity but at least this might help you a bit.

  • Collaboration; if only politicans could figure it out.

  • @iiiiblaze Was not a big Obama fan but he has obviously been the one trying very hard to "collaborate" with the Republicans...It seems the Republicans are more concerned with making sure Obama gets nothing done & unemployment remains high than they are with actually solving America's problems.

  • @iiiiblaze They have.

  • @iiiiblaze If only it were in their own personal interests to do so; it would have been done.

    Actually, now that I think about it, they collaborate quite well. Both parties are expert actors who are very well versed in putting up a nice show for the media in feigning resentment for each other.

    In reality, both reps and dems are in lock-step agreement when it comes to furthering the globalist agenda. Neither will close the border, chill on foreign policy, rescue our dollar or revive our trade.

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more