In Matthew 1:8. there are not 14 in the actual Tanakh.
" Jehoram , THE FATHER of uzziah" , the Roman writers could have just said "GREAT-GRANDFATHER",and that would explain the missing gap in the generations from 2 Chronicles 26:1, Uzziah's actual father is AMAZIAH.
They forced the 14 generations instead of keeping the original 18.
In the last 2 sets of 14 one man JECONIAH is counted TWICE , giving the last set of 14 only a 13 count because Jeconiah was already counted from the last set.
Mary caught Jesus from a toilet seat....anyone with a clue could gather this from the book of truth. Oh, wait.... that book is fake too... oops. Sorry. Guess y'all will just believe anything wont ya....
Since Jesus was born of the Virgin Mary, you need to trace her line. But Since Joseph and Mary were cousins, I guess that ougth to be very easy to do. Just had to point that out, He is from David's line on both sides.
Yes you are correct. It is very important however to exclude the side of Joseph. His bloodline would would make it so Jesus would not fulfill the prophecy, as it was corrupted. That is why we must only deal with the blood line of Mary, even though both sides trace back to David.
In Matthew 1:8. there are not 14 in the actual Tanakh.
" Jehoram , THE FATHER of uzziah" , the Roman writers could have just said "GREAT-GRANDFATHER",and that would explain the missing gap in the generations from 2 Chronicles 26:1, Uzziah's actual father is AMAZIAH.
They forced the 14 generations instead of keeping the original 18.
In the last 2 sets of 14 one man JECONIAH is counted TWICE , giving the last set of 14 only a 13 count because Jeconiah was already counted from the last set.
eretzsus 1 week ago
This makes no sense at all.
In the first place, this is the genealogy of JOSEPH.
According to the myth,
Joseph's DNA had nothing to do with Jesus.
So that was pointless, wasn't it?
In the second place
you've conveniently avoided the contradiction
that says that Joseph's father was HELI.
The Bible is pretty much a failure all the way around.
Imaginefree69 1 year ago
How does one reason with a person who bases his entire life around a virgin birth?
SirianKings 2 years ago
Mary caught Jesus from a toilet seat....anyone with a clue could gather this from the book of truth. Oh, wait.... that book is fake too... oops. Sorry. Guess y'all will just believe anything wont ya....
barebowarchery 3 years ago
AAs you probably know already, the genology of Mohammed, Jesus and Moses can be traced back to Abraham.
Prophet Mohammed to Ismael, son of Abraham and Hagar, and Jesus and Moses to Isaac.
Muslims believe Jesus will return to defeat evil, and that after this peace will reign in the world.
Muslims do not believe in the notion of "Son Of God", but Prophets, and that Jesus too was Prophet, relaying Gods Message to Mankind. Peace.
shabirlondon 4 years ago
Since Jesus was born of the Virgin Mary, you need to trace her line. But Since Joseph and Mary were cousins, I guess that ougth to be very easy to do. Just had to point that out, He is from David's line on both sides.
lancasterhistory 4 years ago
Yes you are correct. It is very important however to exclude the side of Joseph. His bloodline would would make it so Jesus would not fulfill the prophecy, as it was corrupted. That is why we must only deal with the blood line of Mary, even though both sides trace back to David.
safenders 2 years ago