cmon guys lets be realistic here. there was indeed a plane.. .. that footage without the plane is simply lack of pixels.. people recorded took photos and saw the plane with there own eyes.. the real question is Where did this plane come from?
you truthers say the bin ladin videos are fake, where bin ladin talks about 9-11. ok. ok fine. we now say that this video is fake. it was made by you truthers. you see? nwe are using your own arguments against you.
@saltydog78 no, but im not calling it a hoax and im not the only one who was affected by this tragedy, the nation suffered a great loss that day and why cant you seem to respect that? you woudn't be joking around about this shit if you had to watch people fall hundreds of feet only to explode on the pavement right in front of you.
@Shazzamnwithoutus yes we did suffer a great loss that day and we deserve to know the truth. You can keep on believing what you have been fed but I urge you to look at the issue from all sides...Care to explain to me what happened to building 7? We are to believe a fire caused its complete collapse when the owner was taped on 9 11 saying he gave the order to blow it? What about the pentagon? Come on man wake up...we have been duped on an Epic scale.
@dolfanlinda You say that Larry Silverstein is on tape saying he gave the order to blow up WTC7. Really? So he has admitted responsibility then? I assume you are referring to the "Pull it" comment. So who did he give this "pull it" order to?
@azul8811 the facts are that a 47 story sky scraper collapsed at free fall speed. the building kind of looks small on video, but each floor is the size of a football field, so you have a massive building that would stand out in any other city, that was a federal building, so it was very heavily constructed, collapsing with zero resistance directly into its own footprint because of fires and small debris damage? its not possible. its been proven not possible.
@tbirdman1991 Please understand the spirit in which I mean this. I deliberately chose to be very specific in my question to dolfanlinda's post (right above my previous one). And, it is not my intention to discourage replies from those other than the one I've directed my question to. But with one caveat, however. Kindly, reply to the specific question that I've asked. Fair enough? We rarely learn, if we keep repeating the same mantra over and over again in reply to entirely different questions.
@saltydog78 but the burden of proof is on you. cuz you have to prove 9-11 was an inside job. the burden of proof is not on shazzamnwithoutus. the news organizations (abc news nbc news, cnn etc.) all say it was an outside job. so now the burden of proof shifts from the news organizations, to you. and so far you haven proven a damn thing.
@Shazzamnwithoutus <---people like this is why we're so fucked...how a bout all the family members of the deceased that wanted an investigation...I guess they're "pussies" too.
You're either a shill or a dumb bastard...keep it up people, we'll eventually get the truth out.
Just like Al-Qaida confirming Osama's death-- what a bunch of malarkey! It's so obvious that Al-Qaida and the U.S. are in cahoots with each other. The CIA confirmed this in a report that I saw somewhere once a long time ago that I have no proof of. Osama's not dead-- he's working in a 7-11 somewhere on the east coast. It's all just smoke & mirrors perpetuated by the US government! Don't be so naive!
It's obvious that the whole thing is just a model. That smoke and water is so fake. It's already been proven by scientists that the U.S. government employed ILM to create those realistic explosions like you see here on the mock up of the WTC towers. Yes, George Lucas was also in on 9/11. Where do you think he got the money to make the last two Star Wars prequels after the first one bombed? He was paid off by the government. It's all just CGI and models. Don't be so naive!
That shot with no plane os the only footale left out there that proves all the other are fakes! This footage was "lost" at the TV station that owned it, and the only footage from this helicopter is found from people that video taped the live coverage! The black plane footage is %100 fake people, wake up, 911 was an inside job!
That shot with no plane os the only footale left out there that proves all the other are fakes! This footage was "lost" at the TV station that owned it, and the only footage from this helicopter is found from people that video taped the live coverage! The black plane footage is %100 fake people, wake up, 911 was an inside job!
You are kidding right. You are comparing one of the dozens of videoes with F175 in the shot to one that the plane is out of the shot. Wow.....you people are fucking retarded
@TheCrisisKings lol are you confused on what he is showing you?? ...look at it again --notice the "hole" in the tower,that was already hit by a "plane" and the buildings below. --they don't move -but one pictures you see a "plane" and the other doesn't
not an inside job. it sure would make a cool story if it was an inside job. conspiracy theorists should write fiction novels, not present their fantasies as facts
this is very interesting.. I have seen both these video clips before but could the angle of the camera be why the plane wasn't seen in the one clip but seen in the other ??.. the camera was filming from above the towers in a plane / helicopter as opposed to from a lower ground/building position
@15niall Very perceptive of you, my friend! That "minute jerking" is delved into further in September Clues, and actually measured. Also, in all the videos of that day, the smoke appears to be moving at half speed, and doesn't look at all natural!
If you are a new 911 truth seeker, there is a wealth of evidence to show that the official fairytale is, indeed, the REAL CONSPIRACY, as nothing the gov't claims is possible!
@Bongofury361 Haha thankyou. Yes I have followed almost all leads of conspiracy in this matter, and indeed it is a a government cover up. I am definatly a truth seeker, but not a new one haha! And yes, I can see what you mean about the smoke!
All of you better WAKE UP! Those 767s that hit the world trade center are military aircraft. Plus, there were multiple UFO sightings around ground zero during 911. If you think the first Gulf War displayed American military technology, you are wrong. Advanced military aerospace technology was used during 911. Look at the vidoe "911stealth - 9:15 AM F-15, White Jet & Chopper + Orb by drc ".
All of you better WAKE UP! Those 767s that hit the world trade center are military aircraft. Plus, there were multiple UFO sightings around ground zero during 911. If you think the first Gulf War displayed American military technology, you are wrong. Advanced military aerospace technology was used during 911. Look at the vidoe "911stealth - 9:15 AM F-15, White Jet & Chopper + Orb by drc ".
All of you better WAKE UP! Those 767s that hit the world trade center are military aircraft. Plus, there were multiple UFO sightings around ground zero during 911. If you think the first Gulf War displayed American military technology, you are wrong. Advanced military aerospace technology was used during 911. Look at the vidoe "911stealth - 9:15 AM F-15, White Jet & Chopper + Orb by drc ".
In the video where the plane can be seen approaching, the viewer of the other video is somewhere OFF screen to the far LEFT (and he can't see the plane). That this is so can also be verified by the fact that on that video (where the plane is hid) you can see left adjacent side of each tower (the right side if your in the building) - whereas on the video showing the plane the towers you see the OTHER adjacent side. This is simply a case of left and right, and perspective.
I do not believe in the official theory, but this is STUPID. Can't you see that you are looking at the towers from a completely different ANGLE? Check with the buildings adjacent to the towers, and you will see that the plane HAS to be hidden from the one video because it is hidden by the towers. Don't believe me. Compare the buildings in the foreground. This sort of misinformation gives the truth movement a bad name, and only helps the perps!
@2010shadowx was u really there ?!!!!!!!! finally i found some1 that was there !!!! i have a question ?! something did his the towers .. but was it big to be a Boeing 747 ?! ..... and about explosive thing .... the towers fell coz of explosives, not planes. ..... i hope u answer me and thanx in advance =]
someone saw the bombs by accident so they flew the planes into the building at the last second to cover up the bombs but the planes werent really planes as they were missles disgusised as planez because the bombs were fake to throw everyone off from the truth that the bombz were really in the missiles diguised as planes the whole time
@derpotni3riots are you commenting as sarcasm or are you really a retard. Missile disguised as plane? That was a boeing 767 you dumbfuck...how would a 600kph flying tube weighing 150tons and with 50 tons of volatile fuel look when it crashes into a 412m tall concrete inanimate object. Looks like a damn huge missile isn't it? Amazing how stupid some people gets...i wonder how can they have the ability to type on keyboards.
@kanov so your obvious racist against retards that can sort of type. plus if you RE-READ what i said over i clearly said there was NO BOMBs in the building BEFORE the planes hit them and clearly said that the planes clearly were the MISSLEs (with people, i mean they acted like a missle impact) and there was no MISSLEs as the REAL bombs were off course in the wings of the planes that acted like missles flying into the building. thus obviously the BOMBs were the volatile fuel. pay attention.
I'm 50/50 on believing 9/11 was an inside job. One thing to keep in mind regarding "secondary" explosions is that fact that the buildings contained natural gas and electrical lines all the way to the top floor. Could this explain secondary explosions? The Pentagon certainly looks like an inside job though. If I pissed in the bushes.. they'd have 18 HD videos of it. Things just don't add up.
why is steel down the earth cut over and mealting.?why is there more dust in normal..and why go wtc 7 down nothing hit it soo bad-why have some here noise day before on some empty floors in wtc..and scurity not the same this day.
I can ever beliving this not was a job fixet-and some giving green light,like okay do it now..look at bush when he hering wct hit..his eyes and hole his mimik say his having now more.
even if all not is set up-is there many thing there not looking right
Today nothing can be exactly trusted everything is made fake and hidden by conspiracys and remaking of events its sad that the human races history is being tainted and changed by wat people actually believe happened everything on the internet should not be believed like i could easily say the civil war never happened world war I was a myth and made up and some crazy people would believe it and they would make others believe it
lol there are real eye witness reports and tape recording of flight controllers proving that planes hit the WTC. I think this is a fake video lol. I personally think they used UAV to crash these planes into the WTC and the Pentagon.
the first video was the actual video and the second was fake from a movie or a show or a documentary...there has been movies documentarys and other things made out of either respect for the situation or for complete and utter disrespect...which in this case it is being used for utter disrespect...
There is no way it would have stayed intact.These videos are BS.There were no planes and if you believe there were keep on watching more of the idiot box.
Theres is no way an aluminum plane could pass through steel beams and a rebar core an d end up going through.There are many videos out there showing the nose of the plane coming out of the others side of the building in the exact same shape and condition as it was when it went in.I call Bullshit.This is physically impossible.I used do do structural maintenance on boeing 737's and I can tell you the Radome of these aircraft are a composite material composed of a honeycomb resin empregnated paper.
Watch from :45 on and compare the 2 vids.One shows an CGI plane and the other nothing.Wheres the plane?? answer = There wasn't one!! Both videos are .Roughly showing the same angle except ones a little higher.Its easy to add an airplane but difficult to take one out.
@utubedeletedmy1st The only people that saw planes were the ones watching Faux news on the T.V..Do you know anyone who saw the planes ?? I didn't think so.All those people that claimed to have saw planes were all actors.This is an extremely elaborate Zionist controlled media lie and people like you are fooled and believe it.Go to google video and watch 'September clues' or theory of a ghost plane before you make comments without any knowledge of the "TRUE" facts.
@HaunebuVrilThule ya...well my cousin lives there and saw them hit the towers with a bunch of his his friends. and the idea that everyone was an actor... everyone has a way of dealing with stressfull things. people like you like to blame it on bush. the CGI thing is actually funny because dumbasses believe
@utubedeletedmy1st ya well you saying so doesn't make it true.I still call Bullshit on ya.911 was an inside job 100 guaranteed!! Close to 50% of Americans think so.Choke on that one.Look it up dickhead!!Uneducated morons like yourself make statements without doing any actual research to back up their blurted comments.I have 2 cousins from Staten Island who were there that day and they didn't see anything.
@HaunebuVrilThule your just stupid... people make fake videos on youtube, call them news reports and get assholes like you to believe it. o ya, did you know heroshima wasnt nuked, and that general ford never exsited? using your logic, i can state anything and call it facts. i dont quit understand how i am un-educated because im not some commy asshole trying to blame everything on democracy
@utubedeletedmy1st Why youre an idioit.#1 satlam al Suqami, Wail and Waleed al Shehri (two brothers) Both Alive, Abdul Aziz al Omari Alive, Fayez Banihammad (from the UAE), Ahmed al Ghamdi, Hamza al Ghamdi, Mohand al Shehri Alive, Saeed al Ghamdi Alive, Ahmad al Haznawi, Ahmed al Nami Alive, Majed Moqed, and Salem al Hazmi Alive (the brother of Nawaf al Hazmi).
How can the 9/11 Commission be taken seriously when they refer to alive 'hijackers'?
@HaunebuVrilThule ...and that height difference is huge. The buildings obstruct the airplane in the higher up, much tighter shot of the buildings than the wide angle shot from a few miles away.
@HaunebuVrilThule Ohh my god! You are a complete idiot. Like wtf bahaha wooow. I cant believe people are as stupid as you. There is no doubt there was a plane.
Were any of you in N.Y. that day and saw the planes slam into the buildings with your own eyes??!! I didn't think so,so please shut the fuck up!!! Oh yes thats right you all saw them on the TV news and the news tells everyone the truth .You have to believe everything the mass media shows the sheeple.I forgot my bad.BULLSHIT!!!
@Fight4Privacy Go watch "September clues" on google video. The 90 minute one or parts 1 and 2. Anyone who believes that actual planes crashed into the buildings is gullible idiot.The ZIONIST operated Faux,CNN CBS NBC & ABC have you all by the balls.You all fell for the scam sheeple.This is all computer animation and everyone you see interviewed by the media stating that saw planes is an actor.The largest false flag operation in history.Yes there were terrorists and they reside in Washington.
Moronic...... you're forgetting about the other 10,000 videos that clearly show a jet slamming into the tower from other angles. Get a life, saltydog78!
Reference point: 2 identical buildings. The eye fools the brain into thinking the viewpoints are identical.
Reference point: 2 buildings right of the towers not identical. You see the gap between these buildings in the "no plane" video but the "plane" video shows them "touching."
Put two items a foot apart on a table, stand at a viewpoint so they look like they are touching. Stand to where they look to be far apart. Degrees you moved to achieve this?
Oh yea, my bad, those were paper planes i made in class... or that was teh fucking hologram i made 1000 years in the future that i fucking warped to 2001 to laugh at people when i fakely scare the shit out of them.... YOURE ALL SO FUCKING STUPID!!!!!!!!!!! GO GET LAID!
You can't travel a plane 590mph at sea leveel. Please someone explain that to me. There should be contrails (streaks) at that speed, yet we see none. Black jerry you really assault people that know the truth??
@Fader18100 Why can't a plane trave at 590mph at sea level? Contrails don't from at low sea levels. It has more to do with humid exhaust and the very cold temperatures of high altitude. It has nothing to do with speed. You claim to "Know the Truth" but you might want to understand a bit of science first. Trust me it actually helps in finding the truth.
Ok Miko5000 that link is not good enough. We need to actually see people react, those voices were manipulated. I want ample proof like someone in distress NOT someone's voice in distress. You have again proven that this whole event was a big farce.
Woah. That may be a little much, but I can understand your frustration. Most of these guys are probably mentally ill, and the others just use the 'evil government holding them down' as justification to themselves for not accomplishing what they want. Whatever, the world needs fast food workers too.
Miko5000 can you provide me video of people freaking out and going frantic when seeing the planes approaching, like home video. NO? Cos there is none, you'd think that after the first hit people would be watching the skies and ready to see a big ass plane approach. Seriously not for me but for yourself see if you see anyone noticing a plane approaching, someone should have, unless, unless they were all cig and holograms
"can you provide me video of people freaking out and going frantic when seeing the planes approaching, like home video."
Yep.
/watch?v=lyqo4oh-AzU
Not only that but I know a witness that was in the second tower to be hit, evacuated, and watched the whole thing. Unlike you and the rest of the no brainers, he was there.
"cig and holograms"
hahahahahaha. Now admit you were wrong. I'll bet you wont, no planers NEVER do, even though they always are.
Ah yes, but a Heliodisplay: Is not a hologram Is not viewable from 360 degrees Is not projected onto nothing; it uses a mist to project on Is not visible in daylight Is not a solid image, it appears translucent Does not work in motion Does not reflect light or create shadows Does not produce the sound of a jet Does not produce plane parts Does not take off from airports or carry passengers Can't be tracked on radar Can't make a plane shaped hole It is neat looking though, I'll give you that.
US Govt.'s Hidden technology has always been 20 year's ahead of what ever is available in the current Market . Personally I do belive planes were flown into the WTC's
But all the Pentagon has to do is release Video from its secrity CCTV at the Pentagon Which they are not willing to share. What is there to hide ? This basic Question/Disclosure will settle all scores
the no plane theory is ridiculous...and u call it magic?..is that word supposed to help your arguement...do you not see what poibonnie is saying by this "20 year" comment...UAV is a fact tho..project northwoods is a fact tho..do u see what where this is going...and No, the pentagon never released a video of the pentagon plane..they released a controversal video showing white smoke..if u think they did, why dont you post a link to the pentagon plane video...bet u wont find one
yes this is sooo true, which would explain all the 1000's of witnesses who watched the plane fly into the centre, please if ur gonna try to be a conspirasits at least try a little harder, and besides at least i am a born and raised canadian citizen
I dont teach CGI at a university or anything but I know how to research and think for myself...I am in agreeance that there is no way a plane hit on 911...The government has the technology to project holograms that would blow our minds away...we have to stay open to that, I do believe that something it the towers, I believe that people saw something...In the corchesne clip...it looks a lot like a tomahawk cruise missle, anyone wanna discuss
"The government has the technology to project holograms that would blow our minds away"
No they don't. Prove it or you're lying. How did the hologram make noise, react to dynamic and unpredictable lighting conditions, and project onto nothing in broad daylight?
Lol u should work for the pentagon...they also dont so videos of planes hitting the building...but i think the flightpath is directly behind the tower...thats all.
Do think the planes have strange things attached to their fuselage and have strange flashes before they hit the building...focus on those things
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
"8 years on heinsight is something."
No wonder you believe the 'no plane' theory. You're fucking retarded, just like ever other no-plane loser here and everywhere else. Embarrassingly stupid.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Yeah, if anybody knows the truth, it's someone who was 12 years old and in the UK on 9/11.
All you know is the crap you watch on conspiracy videos. You've done no research and you don't know anyone who was there. Do you also believe in magical holograms that make shadows, reflect light, produce sound, are viewable from 360 degrees, and can be projected onto nothing?
I don't know what I'm talking about? I teach video/CGI production at a University. What do you do?
I also know a witness, one of my good friends was in the towers during the first strike. So I have first hand knowledge of the tech involved, and I know an eyewitness.
On the other hand, you watch youtube videos. That's all. Who do you think is more informed?
did you teach bad cgi? thats what we have here dickhead...and, the big black thing at the end of my featured vid is the WORST cgi of the lot... youtube??? ha! the above is from nbc and a pbs documentary! you're a fucking loser! did you learn that in college?? well, you know it now... this is the MEDIAS FUCKING FOOTAGE YOU ASSHOLE... drop dead..
I'm not a conspiracy theorist but I do question how random hits by a plane on a building in different spots and on different floors could have the exact same result and caus esuch a clean collapse. imagine those things falling or toppling liek dominos, the whole city might have been take out.
No intelite> The media covered this shit up with help of military > a missle hit that tower> look for the whole version of channel 4 news clip> its original version shows a missle coming down at an angle > then a day later an airplane is put in its path> creating a whole new flight path> now from what I remember only 2 planes hit the north and south tower
Hmmm, I didn't see that video but it is obvious that the towers were done by an inside job. The building architects, engineers and fireman all agree on that. The building could not have caved in, demolition style due to a fire. Why there are no repercussions in this country is what worries me. It means that the American people are no longer being led by their chosen leaders to represent their beliefs.
So, you went from cruise missiles that had not been invented yet to imaginary space beams. There is NO evidence of any of this. You know what there is evidence of: Planes. Over 40 amateur videos and thousands of eyewitnesses.
Have you ever heard Judy Wood speak? It's laughable at best.
the most of the footage is from the news and people who work for them.much videos are shot from people who works with cgi...i wasnt there when it happend but there is, in my oppinion, enough evidence that it was an inside job.the big mysteries for me are wtc 7 and the pentagon.why do the goverment not show us the videos from the pentagon and why did wtc 7 collaps? whenm you look at pictures from wtc 2,3,4+ 5 you see that they had real massive damage, much more than wtc 7 and the dont collaps...
@55758 Yeah, what a coincidence that just about ALL the "amateur" videos were shot by people who worked in CGI!
Why did the FBI confiscate all the videos from the numerous cameras on and surrounding the Pentagon, and only release 5 unclear frames from the gov't gas station?
In those 5 frames, you don't see a passenger jet, but what looks like a missile with it's squiggly exhaust...
Why no wreckage from any of the "planes"? Totally VAPOURIZED, the gov't would have us believe!
It was like watching a video of you banging your head against a wall and drooling on yourself for two hours, I don't need to see more than a few seconds of it to get the message.
This is silly. They are different angles. Pause at :56 and see for yourself. Plus, the PBS footage seems to be in real time while the "Today" footage is in slow motion. The ball of fire is way slower then other videos have shown. Including the live version, which you strangely don't use here.. You use slowed down replays instead that you could start at any point you want. Nice try, though!
check out he RAW footage of the plane that hit the South Tower. You can plainly see a missil tube on the fuselage underneath, and you can see an explosion a split second before it hits. I have no doubt it was planes, but, my belief is that they were only a distraction, to get, and keep, our minds off of the detonations and explosions that brought the towers to an end, along with innocents, and all branches of law enforcement. Whoever did this,should die the same way..being blown up and burned.
Planes hit the towers. There's no way that every recording on 911 could've been edited in a way that would show a plane. At the same time the towers came down like a controlled demolition with the use of nano-thermite, which has been scientifically proven when the debris from ground zero was tested. There is also footage of 911 witnesses who described hearing "huge explosions". This no plane theory is simply a way of making the people who know 911 was an inside job seem less credible.
How do you explain home videos of planes hitting if there was no plane. These are from two diffrent angles. One shot the plane is hidden behind building and second it isn't WTF.
Might I just say - people who claim that the 9/11 attacks are fake are insulting all of the innocent people that died, including civilians, law enforcement, government employees and firefighters. You must be blind if you can't acknowledge that TWO FREAKING AIRPLANES CRASHED into the the buildings.
to all the dickweeds that think this is fake do u even live in america are are you one of those illeagals that are trying to take ove my this country it aint fake if its fake then you have no feelings for the people that died in those towers of all the soldiers that die for your fucking freedom your ungrateful asshole
Let's make this very clear. If you think the plane is invisible due to the grainy footage, then you must consider the boats in the background. Since the distance from the boats is greater than from the impact, then surely we have to see a plane of some sort. But we can't. So "bad mpeg compression" is clearly not an explanation as to why there were no planes on 9/11
what about the people on the ground that SAW the planes? Im sure if you went to NY and asked anyone that was on the side of the tower that the plane hit they would tell you saw it. Plus im pretty sure theres also footage from the boats.
The power of suggestion. Layer some mass confusion and chaos, people who don't know what happened will simply repeat what other's say really "happened". We do it all the time, repeat what others say. They had the same situation at the pentagon. Where people were saying that a plane hit the pentagon where people knew it sounded more like an explosion. They kept saying, "It's a plane, a plane hit the pentagon"
cmon guys lets be realistic here. there was indeed a plane.. .. that footage without the plane is simply lack of pixels.. people recorded took photos and saw the plane with there own eyes.. the real question is Where did this plane come from?
niksta084eva 5 months ago
you truthers say the bin ladin videos are fake, where bin ladin talks about 9-11. ok. ok fine. we now say that this video is fake. it was made by you truthers. you see? nwe are using your own arguments against you.
judgerofwars 6 months ago
none of the people who call this a hoax were actually in the towers so you pussies can all fuck off
Shazzamnwithoutus 9 months ago
@Shazzamnwithoutus Were you in the towers?
saltydog78 9 months ago 7
@saltydog78 no, but im not calling it a hoax and im not the only one who was affected by this tragedy, the nation suffered a great loss that day and why cant you seem to respect that? you woudn't be joking around about this shit if you had to watch people fall hundreds of feet only to explode on the pavement right in front of you.
Shazzamnwithoutus 9 months ago
@Shazzamnwithoutus yes we did suffer a great loss that day and we deserve to know the truth. You can keep on believing what you have been fed but I urge you to look at the issue from all sides...Care to explain to me what happened to building 7? We are to believe a fire caused its complete collapse when the owner was taped on 9 11 saying he gave the order to blow it? What about the pentagon? Come on man wake up...we have been duped on an Epic scale.
dolfanlinda 9 months ago
@dolfanlinda Sure man, building 7 could've been bombed or whatever, im talking about 1 & 2 tho.
Shazzamnwithoutus 9 months ago
@dolfanlinda You say that Larry Silverstein is on tape saying he gave the order to blow up WTC7. Really? So he has admitted responsibility then? I assume you are referring to the "Pull it" comment. So who did he give this "pull it" order to?
azul8811 9 months ago
@azul8811 the facts are that a 47 story sky scraper collapsed at free fall speed. the building kind of looks small on video, but each floor is the size of a football field, so you have a massive building that would stand out in any other city, that was a federal building, so it was very heavily constructed, collapsing with zero resistance directly into its own footprint because of fires and small debris damage? its not possible. its been proven not possible.
tbirdman1991 9 months ago 5
@tbirdman1991 Please understand the spirit in which I mean this. I deliberately chose to be very specific in my question to dolfanlinda's post (right above my previous one). And, it is not my intention to discourage replies from those other than the one I've directed my question to. But with one caveat, however. Kindly, reply to the specific question that I've asked. Fair enough? We rarely learn, if we keep repeating the same mantra over and over again in reply to entirely different questions.
azul8811 9 months ago
@saltydog78 but the burden of proof is on you. cuz you have to prove 9-11 was an inside job. the burden of proof is not on shazzamnwithoutus. the news organizations (abc news nbc news, cnn etc.) all say it was an outside job. so now the burden of proof shifts from the news organizations, to you. and so far you haven proven a damn thing.
judgerofwars 6 months ago
@saltydog78 Yeah he was in both towers
derpotni3riots 5 months ago
@Shazzamnwithoutus <---people like this is why we're so fucked...how a bout all the family members of the deceased that wanted an investigation...I guess they're "pussies" too.
You're either a shill or a dumb bastard...keep it up people, we'll eventually get the truth out.
royalblowno 9 months ago
Just like Al-Qaida confirming Osama's death-- what a bunch of malarkey! It's so obvious that Al-Qaida and the U.S. are in cahoots with each other. The CIA confirmed this in a report that I saw somewhere once a long time ago that I have no proof of. Osama's not dead-- he's working in a 7-11 somewhere on the east coast. It's all just smoke & mirrors perpetuated by the US government! Don't be so naive!
777zippy777 10 months ago
It's obvious that the whole thing is just a model. That smoke and water is so fake. It's already been proven by scientists that the U.S. government employed ILM to create those realistic explosions like you see here on the mock up of the WTC towers. Yes, George Lucas was also in on 9/11. Where do you think he got the money to make the last two Star Wars prequels after the first one bombed? He was paid off by the government. It's all just CGI and models. Don't be so naive!
777zippy777 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
That shot with no plane os the only footale left out there that proves all the other are fakes! This footage was "lost" at the TV station that owned it, and the only footage from this helicopter is found from people that video taped the live coverage! The black plane footage is %100 fake people, wake up, 911 was an inside job!
ed4ed 10 months ago
That shot with no plane os the only footale left out there that proves all the other are fakes! This footage was "lost" at the TV station that owned it, and the only footage from this helicopter is found from people that video taped the live coverage! The black plane footage is %100 fake people, wake up, 911 was an inside job!
ed4ed 10 months ago
You are kidding right. You are comparing one of the dozens of videoes with F175 in the shot to one that the plane is out of the shot. Wow.....you people are fucking retarded
TheCrisisKings 10 months ago
@TheCrisisKings lol are you confused on what he is showing you?? ...look at it again --notice the "hole" in the tower,that was already hit by a "plane" and the buildings below. --they don't move -but one pictures you see a "plane" and the other doesn't
daheat0627 10 months ago
@TheCrisisKings not trying to be a smartass --just trying to help you out.... :-)
daheat0627 10 months ago
idiots... this is stupid
777azakage 1 year ago
not an inside job. it sure would make a cool story if it was an inside job. conspiracy theorists should write fiction novels, not present their fantasies as facts
CarlosSpicyWeiner7 1 year ago
except the home videos of people not in on the plot have the plane added, i think this one is faked...thanks Gianni
giannivee1 1 year ago
man. it 2011 and nothing has been done. 10% inside job
DreDiego 1 year ago
@DreDiego i meant to say 100% inside job
DreDiego 1 year ago
this is very interesting.. I have seen both these video clips before but could the angle of the camera be why the plane wasn't seen in the one clip but seen in the other ??.. the camera was filming from above the towers in a plane / helicopter as opposed to from a lower ground/building position
xadam2dudex 1 year ago
Hmm...if you look at the video showing an aeroplane, you can see a minute jerking in its movement...it doesnt represent natural flight physics
15niall 1 year ago
@15niall Very perceptive of you, my friend! That "minute jerking" is delved into further in September Clues, and actually measured. Also, in all the videos of that day, the smoke appears to be moving at half speed, and doesn't look at all natural!
If you are a new 911 truth seeker, there is a wealth of evidence to show that the official fairytale is, indeed, the REAL CONSPIRACY, as nothing the gov't claims is possible!
Bongofury361 1 year ago
@Bongofury361 Haha thankyou. Yes I have followed almost all leads of conspiracy in this matter, and indeed it is a a government cover up. I am definatly a truth seeker, but not a new one haha! And yes, I can see what you mean about the smoke!
15niall 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
All of you better WAKE UP! Those 767s that hit the world trade center are military aircraft. Plus, there were multiple UFO sightings around ground zero during 911. If you think the first Gulf War displayed American military technology, you are wrong. Advanced military aerospace technology was used during 911. Look at the vidoe "911stealth - 9:15 AM F-15, White Jet & Chopper + Orb by drc ".
6lemans10 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
All of you better WAKE UP! Those 767s that hit the world trade center are military aircraft. Plus, there were multiple UFO sightings around ground zero during 911. If you think the first Gulf War displayed American military technology, you are wrong. Advanced military aerospace technology was used during 911. Look at the vidoe "911stealth - 9:15 AM F-15, White Jet & Chopper + Orb by drc ".
6lemans10 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
All of you better WAKE UP! Those 767s that hit the world trade center are military aircraft. Plus, there were multiple UFO sightings around ground zero during 911. If you think the first Gulf War displayed American military technology, you are wrong. Advanced military aerospace technology was used during 911. Look at the vidoe "911stealth - 9:15 AM F-15, White Jet & Chopper + Orb by drc ".
6lemans10 1 year ago
1000 demolition experts said 9/11 was demolition job.
justicepartyuk 1 year ago
@2010shadowx
It was a hologram.
and yes.....they have that kind of technology now. It even produces audible sound.
9/11 = inside job
buffboynick 1 year ago
You truthers are fucken idiots.
Dannavy85 1 year ago
The best is videos showing 2nd plane nose diving while others show it going in perfect linear line.
smasila 1 year ago
In the video where the plane can be seen approaching, the viewer of the other video is somewhere OFF screen to the far LEFT (and he can't see the plane). That this is so can also be verified by the fact that on that video (where the plane is hid) you can see left adjacent side of each tower (the right side if your in the building) - whereas on the video showing the plane the towers you see the OTHER adjacent side. This is simply a case of left and right, and perspective.
organisten 1 year ago
I do not believe in the official theory, but this is STUPID. Can't you see that you are looking at the towers from a completely different ANGLE? Check with the buildings adjacent to the towers, and you will see that the plane HAS to be hidden from the one video because it is hidden by the towers. Don't believe me. Compare the buildings in the foreground. This sort of misinformation gives the truth movement a bad name, and only helps the perps!
organisten 1 year ago
@2010shadowx there were indeed objects but def. not planes
techbox2 1 year ago
@2010shadowx was u really there ?!!!!!!!! finally i found some1 that was there !!!! i have a question ?! something did his the towers .. but was it big to be a Boeing 747 ?! ..... and about explosive thing .... the towers fell coz of explosives, not planes. ..... i hope u answer me and thanx in advance =]
999LightBeam666 1 year ago
Fabricated Airplane? Tell that to the families of those onboard those "fake planes"
poopsyproductions 1 year ago
This shows nothing. WTF?
existenceisfake 1 year ago
go see a doctor saltydog everyone knows your a weirdo muslim
themoronhunter 1 year ago
@leudrerrep
get a check up!!
grettoz 1 year ago
@leudrerrep you sound like an expert...
InsanoCouch 1 year ago
someone saw the bombs by accident so they flew the planes into the building at the last second to cover up the bombs but the planes werent really planes as they were missles disgusised as planez because the bombs were fake to throw everyone off from the truth that the bombz were really in the missiles diguised as planes the whole time
derpotni3riots 1 year ago
@derpotni3riots are you commenting as sarcasm or are you really a retard. Missile disguised as plane? That was a boeing 767 you dumbfuck...how would a 600kph flying tube weighing 150tons and with 50 tons of volatile fuel look when it crashes into a 412m tall concrete inanimate object. Looks like a damn huge missile isn't it? Amazing how stupid some people gets...i wonder how can they have the ability to type on keyboards.
kanov 1 year ago
@kanov so your obvious racist against retards that can sort of type. plus if you RE-READ what i said over i clearly said there was NO BOMBs in the building BEFORE the planes hit them and clearly said that the planes clearly were the MISSLEs (with people, i mean they acted like a missle impact) and there was no MISSLEs as the REAL bombs were off course in the wings of the planes that acted like missles flying into the building. thus obviously the BOMBs were the volatile fuel. pay attention.
derpotni3riots 1 year ago
do all you poeple forget about the phone calls from the plane to loved ones down on the ground?
kidcougar008 1 year ago
@kidcougar008
Did your phone have bars on a fast moving airplane in 2001?
Gnarkill2k6 1 year ago
I'm 50/50 on believing 9/11 was an inside job. One thing to keep in mind regarding "secondary" explosions is that fact that the buildings contained natural gas and electrical lines all the way to the top floor. Could this explain secondary explosions? The Pentagon certainly looks like an inside job though. If I pissed in the bushes.. they'd have 18 HD videos of it. Things just don't add up.
drvonhoss 1 year ago
why is steel down the earth cut over and mealting.?why is there more dust in normal..and why go wtc 7 down nothing hit it soo bad-why have some here noise day before on some empty floors in wtc..and scurity not the same this day.
I can ever beliving this not was a job fixet-and some giving green light,like okay do it now..look at bush when he hering wct hit..his eyes and hole his mimik say his having now more.
even if all not is set up-is there many thing there not looking right
MultiAirbrusher 1 year ago
@MultiAirbrusher learn english. PLEASE.
floyd1252 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@MultiAirbrusher
what r u on!!!
grettoz 1 year ago
Today nothing can be exactly trusted everything is made fake and hidden by conspiracys and remaking of events its sad that the human races history is being tainted and changed by wat people actually believe happened everything on the internet should not be believed like i could easily say the civil war never happened world war I was a myth and made up and some crazy people would believe it and they would make others believe it
d1v0d1 1 year ago
@d1v0d1 DONT BE STUPID.......
floyd1252 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
lol there are real eye witness reports and tape recording of flight controllers proving that planes hit the WTC. I think this is a fake video lol. I personally think they used UAV to crash these planes into the WTC and the Pentagon.
YourLordliness 1 year ago
Erm... What?.. What the hell is that video meant to prove at all?
SexyMelon 1 year ago
@SexyMelon that no planes hit the tower
Mr420woo 1 year ago
the first video was the actual video and the second was fake from a movie or a show or a documentary...there has been movies documentarys and other things made out of either respect for the situation or for complete and utter disrespect...which in this case it is being used for utter disrespect...
xXST3MsXx 1 year ago
There is no way it would have stayed intact.These videos are BS.There were no planes and if you believe there were keep on watching more of the idiot box.
HaunebuVrilThule 1 year ago
Theres is no way an aluminum plane could pass through steel beams and a rebar core an d end up going through.There are many videos out there showing the nose of the plane coming out of the others side of the building in the exact same shape and condition as it was when it went in.I call Bullshit.This is physically impossible.I used do do structural maintenance on boeing 737's and I can tell you the Radome of these aircraft are a composite material composed of a honeycomb resin empregnated paper.
HaunebuVrilThule 1 year ago
Another plane just hit it!
Oh my god, Hussein!
Hussein what the hell is going on?
Hussein this is an act of sabotage!
Hussein did you see what I just saw?
(Hussein) Theres one more plane going there.
(Hussein) Whats wrong with these guys?
Whats ehhuh Hussein its got to be sabotage.
Hussein its got to be sabotage!
Supersynapsis 1 year ago
You really expect me to believe that a planes did not hit the buildings!?
You are fucked up in the head.
Fight4Privacy 1 year ago
Comment removed
HaunebuVrilThule 1 year ago
Comment removed
HaunebuVrilThule 1 year ago
i also sopose tht pearl harbor was attacked by alians and bigfoot nuked heroshima
aqz1233 1 year ago
@aqz1233 LOL!!!!
utubedeletedmy1st 1 year ago
Watch from :45 on and compare the 2 vids.One shows an CGI plane and the other nothing.Wheres the plane?? answer = There wasn't one!! Both videos are .Roughly showing the same angle except ones a little higher.Its easy to add an airplane but difficult to take one out.
HaunebuVrilThule 1 year ago 9
@HaunebuVrilThule im guessing the thousands of videos and eye witnesses seeing the plane are false??
utubedeletedmy1st 1 year ago
@utubedeletedmy1st The only people that saw planes were the ones watching Faux news on the T.V..Do you know anyone who saw the planes ?? I didn't think so.All those people that claimed to have saw planes were all actors.This is an extremely elaborate Zionist controlled media lie and people like you are fooled and believe it.Go to google video and watch 'September clues' or theory of a ghost plane before you make comments without any knowledge of the "TRUE" facts.
HaunebuVrilThule 1 year ago
@HaunebuVrilThule ya...well my cousin lives there and saw them hit the towers with a bunch of his his friends. and the idea that everyone was an actor... everyone has a way of dealing with stressfull things. people like you like to blame it on bush. the CGI thing is actually funny because dumbasses believe
utubedeletedmy1st 1 year ago
@utubedeletedmy1st it
utubedeletedmy1st 1 year ago
@utubedeletedmy1st ya well you saying so doesn't make it true.I still call Bullshit on ya.911 was an inside job 100 guaranteed!! Close to 50% of Americans think so.Choke on that one.Look it up dickhead!!Uneducated morons like yourself make statements without doing any actual research to back up their blurted comments.I have 2 cousins from Staten Island who were there that day and they didn't see anything.
HaunebuVrilThule 1 year ago
@HaunebuVrilThule your just stupid... people make fake videos on youtube, call them news reports and get assholes like you to believe it. o ya, did you know heroshima wasnt nuked, and that general ford never exsited? using your logic, i can state anything and call it facts. i dont quit understand how i am un-educated because im not some commy asshole trying to blame everything on democracy
utubedeletedmy1st 1 year ago
@utubedeletedmy1st Why youre an idioit.#1 satlam al Suqami, Wail and Waleed al Shehri (two brothers) Both Alive, Abdul Aziz al Omari Alive, Fayez Banihammad (from the UAE), Ahmed al Ghamdi, Hamza al Ghamdi, Mohand al Shehri Alive, Saeed al Ghamdi Alive, Ahmad al Haznawi, Ahmed al Nami Alive, Majed Moqed, and Salem al Hazmi Alive (the brother of Nawaf al Hazmi).
How can the 9/11 Commission be taken seriously when they refer to alive 'hijackers'?
HaunebuVrilThule 1 year ago
@HaunebuVrilThule ALRIGHT NOW KICK ASS! bust these idiots right between the eyes with the brutal truth. PEACE!
tauras88d 1 year ago
@HaunebuVrilThule ...and that height difference is huge. The buildings obstruct the airplane in the higher up, much tighter shot of the buildings than the wide angle shot from a few miles away.
TheNikkonish 1 year ago
@HaunebuVrilThule Is it just me, or is the one with the plane ADDED, the plane is JERKING!? I never saw a JET-JERK. That's it. It was a JET-JERK.
hddragracer1 1 year ago
@HaunebuVrilThule Ohh my god! You are a complete idiot. Like wtf bahaha wooow. I cant believe people are as stupid as you. There is no doubt there was a plane.
Allday1040 8 months ago
@HaunebuVrilThule i dont see no planes! but i saw a terror of 2 huge ass building moaning in the year 2001 tho i was a kid i remember this event!
psybera1987 8 months ago
Were any of you in N.Y. that day and saw the planes slam into the buildings with your own eyes??!! I didn't think so,so please shut the fuck up!!! Oh yes thats right you all saw them on the TV news and the news tells everyone the truth .You have to believe everything the mass media shows the sheeple.I forgot my bad.BULLSHIT!!!
HaunebuVrilThule 1 year ago
This no plane theory is a joke
Fight4Privacy 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Fight4Privacy Go watch "September clues" on google video. The 90 minute one or parts 1 and 2. Anyone who believes that actual planes crashed into the buildings is gullible idiot.The ZIONIST operated Faux,CNN CBS NBC & ABC have you all by the balls.You all fell for the scam sheeple.This is all computer animation and everyone you see interviewed by the media stating that saw planes is an actor.The largest false flag operation in history.Yes there were terrorists and they reside in Washington.
HaunebuVrilThule 1 year ago 6
@Fight4Privacy No it is not. Research as you believe it, even if you don´t, and after some hours think again.
DaviBraid 1 year ago
is bigfoot in o this??
terdsandwitch2 1 year ago
Moronic...... you're forgetting about the other 10,000 videos that clearly show a jet slamming into the tower from other angles. Get a life, saltydog78!
cyoungrun 1 year ago
Reference point: 2 identical buildings. The eye fools the brain into thinking the viewpoints are identical.
Reference point: 2 buildings right of the towers not identical. You see the gap between these buildings in the "no plane" video but the "plane" video shows them "touching."
Put two items a foot apart on a table, stand at a viewpoint so they look like they are touching. Stand to where they look to be far apart. Degrees you moved to achieve this?
The plane is blocked by the towers.
FSUJoker 1 year ago
Oh yea, my bad, those were paper planes i made in class... or that was teh fucking hologram i made 1000 years in the future that i fucking warped to 2001 to laugh at people when i fakely scare the shit out of them.... YOURE ALL SO FUCKING STUPID!!!!!!!!!!! GO GET LAID!
oIPoiiZo 1 year ago
You can't travel a plane 590mph at sea leveel. Please someone explain that to me. There should be contrails (streaks) at that speed, yet we see none. Black jerry you really assault people that know the truth??
Fader18100 2 years ago
@Fader18100 Why can't a plane trave at 590mph at sea level? Contrails don't from at low sea levels. It has more to do with humid exhaust and the very cold temperatures of high altitude. It has nothing to do with speed. You claim to "Know the Truth" but you might want to understand a bit of science first. Trust me it actually helps in finding the truth.
jim6584 1 year ago
Ok Miko5000 that link is not good enough. We need to actually see people react, those voices were manipulated. I want ample proof like someone in distress NOT someone's voice in distress. You have again proven that this whole event was a big farce.
Fader18100 2 years ago
"ACE the dipshit baker"
Haha. That guy is the worst. A while back he was telling 17 year old girls he wanted to f*ck them. He closed that account though.
"Nice work."
Likewise, dug the guitar stuff on your page.
Miko5000 2 years ago
"I punch them in the face."
Woah. That may be a little much, but I can understand your frustration. Most of these guys are probably mentally ill, and the others just use the 'evil government holding them down' as justification to themselves for not accomplishing what they want. Whatever, the world needs fast food workers too.
Miko5000 2 years ago
Miko5000 can you provide me video of people freaking out and going frantic when seeing the planes approaching, like home video. NO? Cos there is none, you'd think that after the first hit people would be watching the skies and ready to see a big ass plane approach. Seriously not for me but for yourself see if you see anyone noticing a plane approaching, someone should have, unless, unless they were all cig and holograms
Fader18100 2 years ago
"can you provide me video of people freaking out and going frantic when seeing the planes approaching, like home video."
Yep.
/watch?v=lyqo4oh-AzU
Not only that but I know a witness that was in the second tower to be hit, evacuated, and watched the whole thing. Unlike you and the rest of the no brainers, he was there.
"cig and holograms"
hahahahahaha. Now admit you were wrong. I'll bet you wont, no planers NEVER do, even though they always are.
Miko5000 2 years ago
i dont understand how they learn to drive a fucking aeroplane stupid muslims mother fockers
marconi788 2 years ago
thats smart of you. were your parents siblings?
acornhead66 2 years ago
How much weed do you troofers smoke to believe this conspiracy crap?
TDG1967 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Your soo stuiped 9/11 is not a false flag opiration there's no reason
presidentbrian1 2 years ago
ha... failed attempt again...
it is two different angles look closely
naterojas94 2 years ago
Heliodisplay
poibonnie 2 years ago
Miko5000 2 years ago
US Govt.'s Hidden technology has always been 20 year's ahead of what ever is available in the current Market . Personally I do belive planes were flown into the WTC's
But all the Pentagon has to do is release Video from its secrity CCTV at the Pentagon Which they are not willing to share. What is there to hide ? This basic Question/Disclosure will settle all scores
poibonnie 2 years ago
"US Govt.'s Hidden technology has always been 20 year's ahead of what ever is available in the current Market"
Maybe, but that is neither here nor there. You can't base theories on supposed 'secret government magic hologram tech.'
"But all the Pentagon has to do is release Video from its secrity CCTV at the Pentagon"
They did.
"This basic Question/Disclosure will settle all scores"
Really? There are over 40 different views of the WTC impacts, and it hasn't shut up the no-planers yet.
Miko5000 2 years ago
the no plane theory is ridiculous...and u call it magic?..is that word supposed to help your arguement...do you not see what poibonnie is saying by this "20 year" comment...UAV is a fact tho..project northwoods is a fact tho..do u see what where this is going...and No, the pentagon never released a video of the pentagon plane..they released a controversal video showing white smoke..if u think they did, why dont you post a link to the pentagon plane video...bet u wont find one
kevo1120 2 years ago
yes this is sooo true, which would explain all the 1000's of witnesses who watched the plane fly into the centre, please if ur gonna try to be a conspirasits at least try a little harder, and besides at least i am a born and raised canadian citizen
bowdring123 2 years ago
I dont teach CGI at a university or anything but I know how to research and think for myself...I am in agreeance that there is no way a plane hit on 911...The government has the technology to project holograms that would blow our minds away...we have to stay open to that, I do believe that something it the towers, I believe that people saw something...In the corchesne clip...it looks a lot like a tomahawk cruise missle, anyone wanna discuss
m8kinhistry 2 years ago
"The government has the technology to project holograms that would blow our minds away"
No they don't. Prove it or you're lying. How did the hologram make noise, react to dynamic and unpredictable lighting conditions, and project onto nothing in broad daylight?
Miko5000 2 years ago
Do you even know what a hologram IS?
jnoort 2 years ago
Lol u should work for the pentagon...they also dont so videos of planes hitting the building...but i think the flightpath is directly behind the tower...thats all.
Do think the planes have strange things attached to their fuselage and have strange flashes before they hit the building...focus on those things
ZirhNorach 2 years ago
wtf... you're claiming a plane never hit the tower? lol wow
Hail2TheVictorsBaby 2 years ago
DAMN! good video, they actually thought they could fool us with the CGI plane, and they did but 8 years on heinsight is something.
Reggnem 2 years ago 2
This comment has received too many negative votes show
"8 years on heinsight is something."
No wonder you believe the 'no plane' theory. You're fucking retarded, just like ever other no-plane loser here and everywhere else. Embarrassingly stupid.
Miko5000 2 years ago
What are you a Dummy or something. There was no Plane, it was a missile you fool.
DaBlockBoss 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Yeah, if anybody knows the truth, it's someone who was 12 years old and in the UK on 9/11.
All you know is the crap you watch on conspiracy videos. You've done no research and you don't know anyone who was there. Do you also believe in magical holograms that make shadows, reflect light, produce sound, are viewable from 360 degrees, and can be projected onto nothing?
Miko5000 2 years ago
Heliodisplay
poibonnie 2 years ago
you don't even know what you're looking at...
totally BRAINDEAD...
enjoy living in a propaganda bubble???
you're better off NOT.
wsee 2 years ago
I don't know what I'm talking about? I teach video/CGI production at a University. What do you do?
I also know a witness, one of my good friends was in the towers during the first strike. So I have first hand knowledge of the tech involved, and I know an eyewitness.
On the other hand, you watch youtube videos. That's all. Who do you think is more informed?
Miko5000 2 years ago
wsee 2 years ago 2
Right. So you have nothing but opinions and the writing skill of a 8th grader. Like I said, no-planers are just the least intelligent of the lot.
Miko5000 2 years ago
The first 15 seconds were real though
I'll give you that much.
roqone 2 years ago
I'm not a conspiracy theorist but I do question how random hits by a plane on a building in different spots and on different floors could have the exact same result and caus esuch a clean collapse. imagine those things falling or toppling liek dominos, the whole city might have been take out.
MrYahoost 2 years ago
The media is so desperate to have 'been' there that they fake everything.
intelite 2 years ago
No intelite> The media covered this shit up with help of military > a missle hit that tower> look for the whole version of channel 4 news clip> its original version shows a missle coming down at an angle > then a day later an airplane is put in its path> creating a whole new flight path> now from what I remember only 2 planes hit the north and south tower
livnletdi 2 years ago
Hmmm, I didn't see that video but it is obvious that the towers were done by an inside job. The building architects, engineers and fireman all agree on that. The building could not have caved in, demolition style due to a fire. Why there are no repercussions in this country is what worries me. It means that the American people are no longer being led by their chosen leaders to represent their beliefs.
intelite 2 years ago
their will never be a investagation by the government cause "criminals" dont investagate themselves
jrjr143 2 years ago 2
good spoken :-) thats true...
55758 2 years ago
"...it is obvious that the towers were done by an inside job. The building architects, engineers and fireman all agree on that."
That's an absolute lie, and you are a liar.
Miko5000 2 years ago
jassm cruise missiles look like "planes without windows".
but since nobody talks about cruise missiles everybody is drawing 'flight paths' and talking about nano-bullshit.
aeolismensae 2 years ago
Yeah, but we would need a time machine.
JASSM cruise misiles began operational testing and evaluation in 2002, and because of multiple failures they didn't complete development till 2003.
Miko5000 2 years ago
ok miko you win.
i dont care about cruise missiles and i wish i took the comment back.
whats really important is the research of Dr Judy Wood; specifically on Directed Energy Weapons, the Hutchison Effect, and Hurricane Erin...
so... take it easy buddy.
aeolismensae 2 years ago
So, you went from cruise missiles that had not been invented yet to imaginary space beams. There is NO evidence of any of this. You know what there is evidence of: Planes. Over 40 amateur videos and thousands of eyewitnesses.
Have you ever heard Judy Wood speak? It's laughable at best.
Miko5000 2 years ago
Agreed!
socalute 2 years ago
the most of the footage is from the news and people who work for them.much videos are shot from people who works with cgi...i wasnt there when it happend but there is, in my oppinion, enough evidence that it was an inside job.the big mysteries for me are wtc 7 and the pentagon.why do the goverment not show us the videos from the pentagon and why did wtc 7 collaps? whenm you look at pictures from wtc 2,3,4+ 5 you see that they had real massive damage, much more than wtc 7 and the dont collaps...
55758 2 years ago 3
"the most of the footage is from the news and people who work for them."
No, it's not. Most of the footage is from civilians. If you don't provide any evidence for what you say, then I can only assume you're just guessing.
"...evidence that it was an inside job."
This video is about the 'no plane theory,' do you think there were no planes?
"wtc 7 and the pentagon."
Wrong video.
"wtc 2,3,4+ 5"
Wrong video.
Miko5000 2 years ago
@55758 Yeah, what a coincidence that just about ALL the "amateur" videos were shot by people who worked in CGI!
Why did the FBI confiscate all the videos from the numerous cameras on and surrounding the Pentagon, and only release 5 unclear frames from the gov't gas station?
In those 5 frames, you don't see a passenger jet, but what looks like a missile with it's squiggly exhaust...
Why no wreckage from any of the "planes"? Totally VAPOURIZED, the gov't would have us believe!
Keep digging!
Bongofury361 1 year ago
@Bongofury361 Yeah, all these plane crashes and no luggage anywhere?
s43riff 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Bongofury361 Yeah, all these plane crashes and no luggage anywhere?
s43riff 11 months ago
I support David Duke, cause the 9/11 lies really upset me.
Klbz4 2 years ago
We try to bring truth into the picture, and we're laughed at. We try to SAVE them, and we're laughed at. It's ridiculous.
Creon 2 years ago 2
No fire has ever destroyed a steel building. Only explosives. Cemtex. They were demolished.
XenBuddhist 2 years ago
How about the thousands of eye witnesses who watched the planes crash into the buildings
Tasteslikeliberty 2 years ago
how about "from an idiot 11 and 12" on my chanel? i brought up an answer to that question ;)
lotta people see lotta things, and most of em agreed that is was not that big of a plane as an comercial airplane would be like!
have fun watching my docu ~2 hours
metalfist616 2 years ago
I watched the first minute of your stupid video, and it was obvious why you called it 'from an idiot.'
"Plane as an comercial airplane would be like!"
Do you even read the stuff you write?
Miko5000 2 years ago
yeah dude, tell me more! after ONE minute
the whole film is ~120 minutes long, so basicly you saied that after 1/120 of the film! u r sooo smart :D
metalfist616 2 years ago
It was like watching a video of you banging your head against a wall and drooling on yourself for two hours, I don't need to see more than a few seconds of it to get the message.
Miko5000 2 years ago
This is silly. They are different angles. Pause at :56 and see for yourself. Plus, the PBS footage seems to be in real time while the "Today" footage is in slow motion. The ball of fire is way slower then other videos have shown. Including the live version, which you strangely don't use here.. You use slowed down replays instead that you could start at any point you want. Nice try, though!
TVForces 2 years ago
check out he RAW footage of the plane that hit the South Tower. You can plainly see a missil tube on the fuselage underneath, and you can see an explosion a split second before it hits. I have no doubt it was planes, but, my belief is that they were only a distraction, to get, and keep, our minds off of the detonations and explosions that brought the towers to an end, along with innocents, and all branches of law enforcement. Whoever did this,should die the same way..being blown up and burned.
orangevalesweetpea 2 years ago 2
Planes hit the towers. There's no way that every recording on 911 could've been edited in a way that would show a plane. At the same time the towers came down like a controlled demolition with the use of nano-thermite, which has been scientifically proven when the debris from ground zero was tested. There is also footage of 911 witnesses who described hearing "huge explosions". This no plane theory is simply a way of making the people who know 911 was an inside job seem less credible.
dx4life68 2 years ago
Thats a very interesting conclusion of yours dx4life68, but unfortunately anyone on the internet can make conclusions without evidence to back it up
saltydog78 2 years ago
The CIA or Media got ahold of the video and put a fake plane in it. 9/11 was a real attack and sneaky too.
Reptilianmuseum 2 years ago 2
nbc chopper 4 and ny1 aired LIVE
WITH NO ADDED FAKE PLANE!!!
watch my featured vid....
wsee 2 years ago
How do you explain home videos of planes hitting if there was no plane. These are from two diffrent angles. One shot the plane is hidden behind building and second it isn't WTF.
Saint7456 2 years ago
Mate it's not worth your time trying to convince these guys. You just have to laugh.
deekomendez 2 years ago
Might I just say - people who claim that the 9/11 attacks are fake are insulting all of the innocent people that died, including civilians, law enforcement, government employees and firefighters. You must be blind if you can't acknowledge that TWO FREAKING AIRPLANES CRASHED into the the buildings.
thoughtlaboratory 2 years ago
wow, very touching
saltydog78 2 years ago
@saltydog78 your just a doushhe
utubedeletedmy1st 1 year ago
how the fuck are they?
seriously, we are saying the goverment had say in it,
not that the towers got hit
aceridgey 2 years ago
to all the dickweeds that think this is fake do u even live in america are are you one of those illeagals that are trying to take ove my this country it aint fake if its fake then you have no feelings for the people that died in those towers of all the soldiers that die for your fucking freedom your ungrateful asshole
tazz19790 2 years ago
Do you actually have any reason to believe it's fake, other than that it could be, and your own paranoia?
Gaiacarra 2 years ago
Let's make this very clear. If you think the plane is invisible due to the grainy footage, then you must consider the boats in the background. Since the distance from the boats is greater than from the impact, then surely we have to see a plane of some sort. But we can't. So "bad mpeg compression" is clearly not an explanation as to why there were no planes on 9/11
saltydog78 2 years ago
what about the people on the ground that SAW the planes? Im sure if you went to NY and asked anyone that was on the side of the tower that the plane hit they would tell you saw it. Plus im pretty sure theres also footage from the boats.
redslownight 2 years ago
The power of suggestion. Layer some mass confusion and chaos, people who don't know what happened will simply repeat what other's say really "happened". We do it all the time, repeat what others say. They had the same situation at the pentagon. Where people were saying that a plane hit the pentagon where people knew it sounded more like an explosion. They kept saying, "It's a plane, a plane hit the pentagon"
pSychOAtDawn 2 years ago
fucking morons will believe ANYTHING that a guy with a corporate media logo to his left on the TV SCREEN says....
global mass hypnosis...
wsee 2 years ago 2
I'm not the one trying to prove a point.
MChav7 2 years ago