@MarcusMacgregor2 You're over estimating the effect of 1337. There were 7 such responses out of 1000. And it wasn't an outrageous guess as it's very near the right answer.
Hey, btw I love your video's because no one else on YouTube provides so many mathematically based videos on any type of regular basis... Anyways, I was wondering, if taking the log of all values of a distribution can help "weed out" proportional mistakes, what would taking two logarithms do? Or three, etc... Does this progression lead to any type of higher-order analysis in terms of these mistakes? Thanks!!!
@housemoney1 no matter what, people are going to be able to do that. The cow example had men who had butchered a cow of proportionate size probably wrote down what the weight of their cow was.
But even with the jelly bean jar guessing contests that can still happen and that will effect the wisdom of the crowd.
That video was put together so well that I actually had the thought that you should take the logarithmic average before you even mentioned it. And I had NEVER EVEN HEARD of the logarithmic average!
I don't know what you guys did to guide my mind toward that inspiration, but it worked!
Conducting this over the web and giving people a lot of time means they can find jars that look like that one, fill them with jelly beans, and count. Would the median, mode, geometric mean be as good without those types of participants?
This was the most interesting thing I'v seen all week. I'm loving your videos, keep it up. I thank you and all my math teachers who you remind me of for making math fun and interesting!
of course 1337 was the most common answer ^^ i said it because it wasn´t too unlikely, and if I hadn't guessed on 1337 and then that was the correct answer, i would probably have had to kill myself ;)
Thumbs up if you felt like you were in math class Just now. My school ended this week's Wednesday. Sure did to me. And i just love those parts you try to make it funny :D
This is wrong. Taking the average of the logs might get you the geometric mean, but the DEFINITION is to multiply them and take the nth root of the answer, where n is how many people were in. But I think you wanted to make it simple, right?
I guessed 300 and actually though there were 300 in there. Was mine considered an outlier?
Jim, please make this clear to me. I was though in school, that geometric mean is calculated as sqrt(number1*number2) or with more that two numbers (let's say 3) as thirdroot(number1*number2*number3). Is it the same or (as usual) mathematicians use one term for two things?
@okmasko Those two things are the same. There are two ways to define the geometric mean, and they give the same answer. In the video we said it was 10 to the power of the average log value. Alternatively you can say it's the nth root of the product of the data (compare this with the arithmetic mean which is the sum of the data divided by n). I prefer the first definition, as it doesn't involve nth roots!
The thing is with having so much ways of calculating the mean is to prove a theory you should have made up your mind about the average in advance to really show more reliable proof for the theory. Now it just looks like you chose the one that is closest. I understand the reason for getting a geometric mean but that is just in hindsight.
@WhatforNameIsThat We did make the prediction in advance. Did you not get that? David didn't even know the answer until the end of the video. That was his genuine reaction.
I don't understand why the geometric mean is more useful when there are proportional mistakes. I'll do some googling, but a video on that might be nice too :)
Haha thanks for keeping in David's comment at the end ^^. So then, it is fair to say that there is a correlation between WotC and individual expertise, right? I wonder if you could get a much closer answer asking something the general public is more familiar with. Maybe get an strangely shaped container and ask how much water is in it measured to the nearest mL would yield a strong WotC.
Zomg now I want to test lots of different things to develop a WotC factor.
@Error081688 Yes, we thought "so the wisdom part is important" would sum it up. It is the expertise of the crowd, the better the expertise the better the result.
Did you check to see if people's answers were getting closer to the mean as time went on? In other words, were people being influenced by the answers that had gone before? If this were happening, one might expect the standard deviation of the first 500 answers to be less than the standard deviation of the final 500 answers.
@singingbanana put the mean/meadian/log in a side. i am confused with the numbers you got it from viewers.so the mode is 1337, since the mode frequency is high. that's why your bell curves extrema is located in bin width of 1500-2500. lets say if u r going to do by yourself only option left is RANDOM number in calculator or in excel. doesn't make sense, after 100 random numbers mean hit a horizontal line and there will be a confident interval. what the point of doing this? ENLIGHTEN ME
People like this math more than what you have to learn in school, i read a book about it's called 'Professor Stewart's Cabinet of Mathematical Curiosities - by Ian Stewart': a great book, all about the things you teach us. Keep on roll'n vids!
@singingbanana hello, just in determining the median/geometric mean of the data. Is it possible when it's in intervals. e.g. 1000 people guessing 0-500, 500 people guessing 500-1000 etc? I can't list the data in numerical order!
36:17
watch?v=60mw8kkXFSA
Ben S. Bernanke is looking for feed back. :)
gjonesy9 4 days ago in playlist Liked videos
3:26 i just love how you call us a bunch of nerds and yet you are the mathmatician
carclubleader 2 weeks ago
benford's law
saminulh 1 month ago
@saminulh LOL
Tranquilance 1 month ago
What average did you use for getting the LOG average? :D
ThePraash 4 months ago
i love the R output for the graphs!! although i prefer SAS for my stats analysis
winonakid1990 5 months ago
It actually worked worse than mentioned.
The mode average of 1337 should of been rejected as a joke answer.
(It's gamer geek for elite, they speak math nerd I guess)
Since this is lower than the 1680 geometric mean it would raise the mean by its removal.
The internet may not provide this "wisdom of the crowd" you speak of; you need a real crowd not a virtual one. (and six-pence)
MarcusMacgregor2 7 months ago
@MarcusMacgregor2 You're over estimating the effect of 1337. There were 7 such responses out of 1000. And it wasn't an outrageous guess as it's very near the right answer.
singingbanana 7 months ago
1337... wait thats leet in well, the language of leet
carclubleader 7 months ago
What jellybean jar has 1617 beans when you start off?
Haguatchi 7 months ago
Another great video. Subbed. First found the channel while searching for "flexagons" after discovering them in one of Martin Gardner's books.
BigCityScripts 7 months ago
Good to know that real mathematicians use R :D
pawit 7 months ago
@pawit Hahaha. True.
singingbanana 7 months ago
@pawit R?
GuyMcpersonLol 7 months ago
the answer is 0 after you eat it
Materialgirl1021 7 months ago
Hey, btw I love your video's because no one else on YouTube provides so many mathematically based videos on any type of regular basis... Anyways, I was wondering, if taking the log of all values of a distribution can help "weed out" proportional mistakes, what would taking two logarithms do? Or three, etc... Does this progression lead to any type of higher-order analysis in terms of these mistakes? Thanks!!!
johnnyappleseed12345 8 months ago
welp..... im gonna go play black ops
PattyObrien616 8 months ago
@housemoney1 no matter what, people are going to be able to do that. The cow example had men who had butchered a cow of proportionate size probably wrote down what the weight of their cow was.
But even with the jelly bean jar guessing contests that can still happen and that will effect the wisdom of the crowd.
HolbytaTook 8 months ago
That video was put together so well that I actually had the thought that you should take the logarithmic average before you even mentioned it. And I had NEVER EVEN HEARD of the logarithmic average!
I don't know what you guys did to guide my mind toward that inspiration, but it worked!
osrevad 8 months ago
y cant you use the root mean square?
eaturfeet653 8 months ago
@eaturfeet653 What do you mean?
anticorncob6 8 months ago
Lol awkward silence at the end XD
00DonutDude 8 months ago
Conducting this over the web and giving people a lot of time means they can find jars that look like that one, fill them with jelly beans, and count. Would the median, mode, geometric mean be as good without those types of participants?
housemoney1 8 months ago
"Thats amazing!"
wilfred8686 8 months ago
I can't believe i watched a video 7:22 seconds about jelly beans. lol
dahattrickboy 8 months ago 3
This was the most interesting thing I'v seen all week. I'm loving your videos, keep it up. I thank you and all my math teachers who you remind me of for making math fun and interesting!
masterlink101 8 months ago
noooooooooooooooooooo i wanted the jelly beans!!!!!!!!!!!! :) congrats ddss6
jlmknight 8 months ago 2
The fact that you mentioned my googol comment, and enjoyed it, has made my day
:-)
NotJames1 8 months ago
i would have won if he didn't eat that 1 jelly bean...
dirtygurty4 8 months ago
you guys are a great team!
theindfla 8 months ago
This video is one of the best yet. Do more!!!!!
"That was amazing!"
Artonox 8 months ago
of course 1337 was the most common answer ^^ i said it because it wasn´t too unlikely, and if I hadn't guessed on 1337 and then that was the correct answer, i would probably have had to kill myself ;)
11000010101 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
i took the mean of the 10 people on the page i posted on and i think ddss6 was on that page =P
MasterA55a55in 8 months ago
Comment removed
MasterA55a55in 8 months ago
Comment removed
MasterA55a55in 8 months ago
i was way off and therefore am a moron
keggerous 8 months ago
Thumbs up if you felt like you were in math class Just now. My school ended this week's Wednesday. Sure did to me. And i just love those parts you try to make it funny :D
jayjayspider 8 months ago
How is double the answer and half the answer proportional to the average?
If they are just as likely to be X beneath the answer or X above the answer, that would be proportional, wouldn't it?
IcEye89 8 months ago
haha, the mode is 1337, leet.
BabySelvey 8 months ago
I dnt believe that after you said "its 1 less than it was" you managed to eat 1 jelly bean then close the jar.
ArjayBlogs 8 months ago
I think instead of 10,000....u should have probably used the "over 9,000" rule
hollumber 8 months ago
I want a recount
Blackcat008 8 months ago
lol most common ans is 1337
Jonsoncao 8 months ago
Nice statistics lesson--and thanks for giving a practical example of the meaning and utility of the geometric mean!
But...clearly, you counted wrong. My estimation was in the 1800's, IIRC.
GetMeThere1 8 months ago
Did you remember to count the one that you ate!?
cardsfan7012 8 months ago
my 10,000 was a joke... sorry if that messed up the data
raginggingy17 8 months ago
@raginggingy17 Not at all. I knew it was.
singingbanana 8 months ago
1337- Bunch of nerds.. i was dying!
TheMangos27 8 months ago
This is wrong. Taking the average of the logs might get you the geometric mean, but the DEFINITION is to multiply them and take the nth root of the answer, where n is how many people were in. But I think you wanted to make it simple, right?
I guessed 300 and actually though there were 300 in there. Was mine considered an outlier?
anticorncob6 8 months ago
So much for estimating the height and the area of the base and googling the density of jellybeans lol. What's the volume of the jar by the way?
guitardudeguy00 8 months ago
Hahah "bunch of nerds"
jampk24 8 months ago
"MY FIGHT MONEY!"
muffemod 8 months ago
I have no idea how I first came across you channel but I'm quite happy I did.
poooop83 8 months ago
THAT WAS SO INTERESTING! I love your videos!
FutureInventions 8 months ago
"1337 - Bunch of nerds." I had a pretty good laugh at that comment. Pretty leet, man.
JPenfield 8 months ago
Jim, please make this clear to me. I was though in school, that geometric mean is calculated as sqrt(number1*number2) or with more that two numbers (let's say 3) as thirdroot(number1*number2*number3). Is it the same or (as usual) mathematicians use one term for two things?
okmasko 8 months ago
@okmasko Those two things are the same. There are two ways to define the geometric mean, and they give the same answer. In the video we said it was 10 to the power of the average log value. Alternatively you can say it's the nth root of the product of the data (compare this with the arithmetic mean which is the sum of the data divided by n). I prefer the first definition, as it doesn't involve nth roots!
singingbanana 8 months ago
was that the amount before you ate one or after you ate one?
lizardbart1 8 months ago
@lizardbart1 After :)
singingbanana 8 months ago 9
haha I can't believe it turned out to be such a magical number BY CHANCE, just because you decided to eat one :D It's like you intentionally ate it.
ElMirc 8 months ago
lol at the number being 1337 XD
concretecubes 8 months ago
I think I'll cheat next time by calculating the mean myself and giving that as an answer :P
shirankao69 8 months ago
The thing is with having so much ways of calculating the mean is to prove a theory you should have made up your mind about the average in advance to really show more reliable proof for the theory. Now it just looks like you chose the one that is closest. I understand the reason for getting a geometric mean but that is just in hindsight.
WhatforNameIsThat 8 months ago
@WhatforNameIsThat We did make the prediction in advance. Did you not get that? David didn't even know the answer until the end of the video. That was his genuine reaction.
singingbanana 8 months ago 13
@WhatforNameIsThat take a look - genuine reaction at 6:41 :D
okmasko 8 months ago
I got closer than the geometric mean! Woot!
rockstarduh5 8 months ago
Great. That's amazing!
TyYann 8 months ago
I guess 4273 was a bit of a high guess.
Zeldakitteh 8 months ago
I guessed 13. :(
Freshman000000 8 months ago
I don't understand why the geometric mean is more useful when there are proportional mistakes. I'll do some googling, but a video on that might be nice too :)
Error081688 8 months ago 2
Finally a proper math video! Awesome!
HappyMemoryXD 8 months ago
Haha thanks for keeping in David's comment at the end ^^. So then, it is fair to say that there is a correlation between WotC and individual expertise, right? I wonder if you could get a much closer answer asking something the general public is more familiar with. Maybe get an strangely shaped container and ask how much water is in it measured to the nearest mL would yield a strong WotC.
Zomg now I want to test lots of different things to develop a WotC factor.
Error081688 8 months ago
@Error081688 Yes, we thought "so the wisdom part is important" would sum it up. It is the expertise of the crowd, the better the expertise the better the result.
singingbanana 8 months ago
wow i guessed 2060 and commented 2059 cause he ate one... let me finnish the vid ;D hehe
TheRacemaster23 8 months ago
5:57
he looks way too happy o_O
Randja066 8 months ago
@ddss6 Congrats!!
ipadkeyboard13 8 months ago
Congrats to the winner! Same I didn't win. Jelly beans are yummy!
oliethefolie 8 months ago
so the masses have geometric wisdom lol
Tolstoievsky 8 months ago
this was definitely one of the best videos xD
FrazNinja 8 months ago
hahahaha. i guessed 1212!!!
guppiemagic101 8 months ago
You should have excluded 1337 from the calculations lol.
grande1899 8 months ago
He has a special feeling for humor 16-16 and then a guy who wins has a 6 in his name!
Snakke40 8 months ago
1st year university statistics finally comes handy (:
crayonstik 8 months ago
so what should be the error from doing this like how much would you be wrong
somebodyruleE 8 months ago
I love how 1337 was the mode. We truly are a bunch of of nerds!
mrsean22795 8 months ago
YEAHHHHHHHH!!!!!!
ddss6 8 months ago 77
@ddss6 AHAH gratz!
happylee02 8 months ago
@ddss6 Congratulations! Don't get sick form eating 'em all at once ;-)
FHomeBrew 8 months ago
@ddss6 xD
Crashkiller62 8 months ago
Did you check to see if people's answers were getting closer to the mean as time went on? In other words, were people being influenced by the answers that had gone before? If this were happening, one might expect the standard deviation of the first 500 answers to be less than the standard deviation of the final 500 answers.
RodDuncan 8 months ago
"Hello everyone!" :D
raxcax 8 months ago
@singingbanana put the mean/meadian/log in a side. i am confused with the numbers you got it from viewers.so the mode is 1337, since the mode frequency is high. that's why your bell curves extrema is located in bin width of 1500-2500. lets say if u r going to do by yourself only option left is RANDOM number in calculator or in excel. doesn't make sense, after 100 random numbers mean hit a horizontal line and there will be a confident interval. what the point of doing this? ENLIGHTEN ME
sathiyanadaraja 8 months ago
I hated stats before, but now it seems to fun. :)
nelsyeung 8 months ago
haha, I learned all these concepts in stats last year, but that's a sick way of applying it in this type of scenario.
SirWilliamCo 8 months ago
I really like David, more of him please :)
MOSpr0ductz 8 months ago
@MOSpr0ductz I agree.
singingbanana 8 months ago
I SAID 1617!!!!! AND HE ATE A JELLYBEAN AT THE END!!!! *cries*
EighteenCharacters 8 months ago 8
@EighteenCharacters HAHA XD
Wallencis1 8 months ago
I love it when you teach us about maths its more fun than university or school :D
GamemakingDude 8 months ago
This is great. Even though I'm not the statistician type, a big hand to you.
:)
Drummermean2 8 months ago
i failed so hard...i really hate when i guess so off... i mean 8K+ what was i thinking! D: oh well, congrats to the winner!
animewisher 8 months ago
Histograms date me back to year 8... memories =]
HappyApple330 8 months ago
I had guesed about 960......lol!!!
bBoyMikE13 8 months ago
That is amazing!!!
mihassan 8 months ago
People like this math more than what you have to learn in school, i read a book about it's called 'Professor Stewart's Cabinet of Mathematical Curiosities - by Ian Stewart': a great book, all about the things you teach us. Keep on roll'n vids!
aandgpointlessvideos 8 months ago
so cool,this is why you are so cool!
eXisentZ 8 months ago
Why are you not my math teacher?
marcusFOREVER 8 months ago
I thought the old man was Sean Connery.
AFVC1 8 months ago
He got a jar of beaheans, he got a jar of beaheans! Guess how much's inside of it!
D3m190d 8 months ago
i think theres is 1616 jelly beans...did i get it :D
oh wait...the contest is over:(
rororigo52 8 months ago
1337... buncha nerds :D
VinylCyril 8 months ago 2
Brilliant video :)
Helldiv3rr 8 months ago
You guys are having way too much fun with math! ;)
Great to see, keep it up!
ghudner 8 months ago 56
Oh, Jelly Bean jar.. Must you follow Benford's law?
TpendragonT 8 months ago
Bill Murray???
DestroManiak 8 months ago
this, was awesome. dam, im gonna own my math teachers face off some day.
NEDinACTION 8 months ago
he called us nerds :3
bugshirt4 8 months ago
This is really clever, is this the precursor to Isaac Asimov's psychohistory idea?
illustriouschin 8 months ago
Aw I got 1723, I'm almost average :(
MaThWa92 8 months ago
I knew I wasn't going to win. Congrats to who did. 1616 huh? Awesome it was such a simple number, sixteen sixteen
Very interesting way of getting the mean. :]
MissDante 8 months ago
Doh! I got 1734, 5 away from the median average. :(
Srxjer 8 months ago
i swear i didnt put 1337... o wait yes i did
sinkamaru 8 months ago
1337 = leet
lol
36trooper 8 months ago
Aww, now I need to go rob a jellybean store :(
Asperomo 8 months ago
singingbanana you've helped me with some math i needed figuring out in this video. thank you very much
Cagebreaker21 8 months ago
This was one of your best videos.
oEQjet 8 months ago 29
@oEQjet Thanks! Especially since there is some proper maths going on here :)
singingbanana 8 months ago 9
Since im in quick! Id just like to say that i love 'your' math, im enjoy math alot more when you teach/tell about it.
BaDSPLeR 8 months ago 19
@BaDSPLeR Aww. Thanks.
singingbanana 8 months ago 7
@singingbanana hello, just in determining the median/geometric mean of the data. Is it possible when it's in intervals. e.g. 1000 people guessing 0-500, 500 people guessing 500-1000 etc? I can't list the data in numerical order!
Cagebreaker21 8 months ago
What the heck, how did I miss seeing this contest!
illustriouschin 8 months ago
SO COOL :D
TruckFilms 8 months ago
First View....
GeneralBasco 8 months ago 2
second =)
gohyinxian12 8 months ago
second!
Snc6475 8 months ago
first
MarshellMcgehee 8 months ago