Added: 2 years ago
From: alanheath
Views: 448
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (21)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • It's interesting, how you - a person so interested in history and NWO (:D) works in packaging industry.

    The speaker speaks very good English.

  • I am not interested in the NWO at all. I just use it for making jokes. The NWO is a figment of the imagination of those who want to feel oppressed.

    On the other hand, the packaging industry is very real as is branding. I try to live in the real world which is much more exciting than some fanciful persecution theory!

    I am, however, very interested in history!!

  • Yes, I put the smiley face in the brackets to show that your interes in NWO isn't at all meant...

    Real world IS exciting and so is the way we sense it. As I was leafing through the books on science I borrowed some time ago, I found out that everything is just undulation, simple waves.. Isn't that incredible?

    Have you ever heard of sensory deprivation? I studied that as a part of biology and psychology subjects. It's very interesting.

  • Sorry, the smiley face did not come out!

    I thought that sensory deprivation was things like not allowing people to sleep. Or maybe I have not understood it!

  • The sensory deprivation means that a person is put inside a "receptacle": with salt water in it so that he/she floats in it = no touch sense

    The receptacle is made of acoustic tiles = no hearing

    You close your eyes = no sight

    There's no scent = no sense of smell

    And you have nothing in mouths = no taste

    After some time in such a place, people get hallucinations, which for some are so real that they cannot distinguish between an illusion and real world. (to be continued)

  • That makes me think that maybe everything we sense is just an illusion... I like to tinker with that idea.

    And now if everthing is from the scientific point of view an undulation then... I don't know what's the impact of these theories yet.. :) But isn't it all thought-provoking?

  • That is a bit beyond me.

    However on hallucinations, I remember when I was in the Army after a two week exercise with serious lack of sleep I had hallucinations. I was not the only one. One character even opened fire (with blank rounds) at a hallucination.

    Altered minds.

  • Army seems to have been tough with you.

  • Not at all, it was a good education!

  • In 1936 American commentator H. L. Mencken wrote:

    The central belief of every moron is that he is the victim of a mysterious conspiracy against his common rights and true deserts. He ascribes all his failure to get on in the world, all of his congenital incapacity and damfoolishness, to the machinations of werewolves assembled in Wall Street, or some other such den of infamy

  • Absolutely - must agree on this one! The above exchange was part of my attempts at being amusing by attacking conspiracy theorists. However judging by the amount of abuse I have received on a film about the death of Diana, Princess of Wales then one may be forgiven in thinking that the conspiracy theorists have the upper hand!

  • thats ironic that the one conspiracy theory i buy into, i think the royal family had di whacked..forgive me..but that 9 11 was an inside job crap really angers me its absurd..you have to be eithe rinsane a traitor or an enemy of democracy to even entertain it

  • There is no doubt in mind that the Royal Family could not have killed Diana - even if they had wanted to. Those days ended with the revolution of 1689. Apart from that there is no sense.

    With 9/11 being an inside job it has a similar ingredient. Suicide of the driver/pilots who are in on the plot. Then the buildings were wired to explode (and no-one noticed the engineers doing it) If it were not so tragic, the conspiracy theorists would be very amusing.

  • no doubt?

    rubbish

    she is one of the wealthiest women in the world

    she technically rules britian

    things are never what they seem

    and honestly being French

    i'll never trust the English completely

    bunch of self righteous hypocrites

    like cromwell for example

    crying about purifiying chritianity and democracy meanwhile stabling horses in catholic churches wiping out half the irish population and selling the other half into slavery,what a bout those small pox laden blankets they gave indians

  • in the french and indian war

    the englsih and the french basically abandoned the polish in ww2 even though they had a pact

    i know anglo saxons beleive themselves to be less corrupt than say dagos or frenchies , but that sport of bigotry and arrogance really angers me

    the british govt is just as capable of being ruthless

    may i give you another example?

    well to bad your getting one becsue you stepped onm a toe here

  • The abandoment of Poland is a completely false idea. The UK and France lived up to its treaty obligations (which you can read) by declaring war on Germany. The fact that they were unable to prevent the occupation of the USSR just shows that they lost the war (contrary to popular belief).

  • the phony war?

    look the french were guilty too

    but dont go there and the USA too

    abandoned poland to the eastern block

    we all betrayed the poles

  • The Phoney War, also called the Twilight War by Winston Churchill, der Sitzkrieg in German ("the sitting war": a play on the word Blitzkrieg),[1] the Bore War (a play on the Boer War) and la drôle de guerre ("the funny war") was a phase in early World War II in the months following the German invasion of Poland in September 1939 and preceding the Battle of France in May 1940 that was marked by a lack of major military operations in Continental Europe.

  • The great powers of Europe had declared war on one another, yet neither side had committed to launching a significant attack, and there was relatively little fighting on the ground, notwithstanding

  • The great powers of Europe had declared war on one another, yet neither side had committed to launching a significant attack, and there was relatively little fighting on the ground, notwithstanding terms of Anglo-Polish military alliance and Franco-Polish Military Alliance, which obliged the United Kingdom and France to take military action, in the case of the United Kingdom, in 15 days time

  • The French did attack in the Saar which was probably the best they could do.

    The UK and France between them suffered almost one million casualties, lost their Empires and spent 60 years paying for a war they ultimately lost. Hardly betrayal?

    Poland was sold out by FDR but as the US did not have an alliance with Poland then it was scarcely betrayal.

    However we certainly did betray Czechoslovakia which found itself attacked by every neighbour except Romania.

  • exactly we never signed a treaty

  • The Dublin and Monaghan Bombings on May 17, 1974 was a series of car bombings in Dublin and Monaghan in the Republic of Ireland. The attacks left 33 persons dead and almost 300 injured, the largest number of casualties in any single day in The Troubles

  • The Loyalist paramilitary group, the Ulster Volunteer Force (UVF), claimed responsibility for the bombings in 1993. However, there are widespread allegations that British Intelligence colluded in the bombings, the evidence for which is contested by both the British Government and those accused.

    It is the worst paramilitary attack in terms of fatalities in twentieth-century Ireland.

  • No one has ever been charged with the attacks, which have been described by the Oireachtas Committee on Justice as an act of international terrorism colluded in by British Security Forces

    now unless you are willing to call the irish governement a bunch of paranoid conspiracy nuts, you must face hard evidence HARD EVIDENCE not paranoid

    suspicians that the british govt helped plant bombs that killed innocent irishman and women, so dont tell me that british intelligence wasnt capable of killing

  • I dont know anything about it so I am not going to comment.

  • one ex royal bint the quenn found embarrassing

    there is always doubt

    and the british arent beyond killing

    they did it in dublin in 1974

  • But what was the point of killing Diana?

  • motive? she was an embarassment

    always in the news

    obvious motive also envy at here popularity

    i'm not sayng they defietely did it but to totally rule the possiblity out is equally irrational

    they planted the bomb in dublin

    the british security service played a hand in that it was avery sophisticated bomb

  • If the Royal Famlly go round bumping off people who are an embarrasment and always in the news then perhaps Beckham will be the next target?

  • i just have a hunch they killed her and i'm always right

    i hardly ever buy into conspiracy plots but the royal family whacked di

    and the kennedys killled monroe

    i know that like i was there when it happened

  • You were there when the Kennedy's killed Monroe? Why did you not try to stop them?

  • i was only three and there were too many of them

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more