YES OFC he should.. ALL WHITE NATION leaders .. should be hanged for the last 100 years ...they fucked the world.. WHITE People should be fucking eliminated
@vicomatre All white people should be eliminated? They why are you in Norway? haha. Seems like the wrong place to live with that attitude. You might be liable to seeing a white person every day! The horror! Why don't you fuck off and go back to where you came from.
Blair supports chopping hands off because it is part of 'their culture'. Why did he not use the same kind of logic for Iraq? Ethnical cleansing was part of THEIR culture! Seriously, what was the difference between the tyrannic regime of Iraq and the tyrannic regime of Saudi Arabia? You guessed it! The latter collaborated on oil...
1. The tyrannical Saudi regime had never possessed, sought or USED weapons of mass destruction. - Neither had Iraq, as has been proven.
2. The tyrannical Saudi regime was not at war with our country in recent history and thus directly hostile. - Saudi Arabia has been at war with Yemen (not to mention, with its own citizens).
3. The Saudi regime did not itself actively harbour terrorists. - Neither did Iraq. In fact, if anything, Saddam was unreasonably harsh on terrorist as compared to the actions of the Western governments.
4. The Saudi regime had not committed genocide and proven itself to be led by a REAL psychopath. - I agree with you on that. I hope chopping people's heads off in the middle of the city to terrify the rest of the population into submissiveness does not amount to terrorism.
I don't know why you think Saddam was 'unreasonably harsh' on terrorists. He was an active terrorist-supporter. He even came to let Zarqawi operate freely.
Implying that Blair is a psychopath, you already show yourself to be something of an idiot lacking perspective.
But when you say that Iraq has been proven to never have possessed, sought or ever used weapons of mass destruction... you show yourself to be utterly ignorant of historical facts. Go read a history book. Or at least wiki Saddam.
"Israel possesses, seeks, and uses WMDs with some regularity."
Refer me to one example of Israel using weapons of mass destruction (chemical, biological or nuclear). Otherwise shut your ignorant mouth. It is one thing to be wrong about an issue, it's far worse to just fabricate events to support your position.
Take it easy. Facts that are at odds with your favorable view of Israel should not make you angry at me, but rather at Israel.
How about the dropping of thousands of cluster bombs on the civilians of Lebanon in 2006? How about their pushing the use of nuclear "bunker busters" against Iran?
"How about the dropping of thousands of cluster bombs on the civilians of Lebanon in 2006? How about their pushing the use of nuclear "bunker busters" against Iran?"
These are the best you can come up with for examples of Israel using weapons of mass destruction? Weapons that aren't WMD and something that has not even happened (yet)? Of course that's all you have.
It's inconvenient for you but Israel hasn't used WMD.
Cluster bombs resulting in the deaths (so far) of over 1,000 civilians are no WMD? They aren't weapons? The deaths are not deaths? Or maybe over 1000 is not mass enuff for your definition?
How about the nuclear weapons Israel is hoping to use -- those "bunker busters".. Those don't qualify?
Yet those amateur rockets hamas fired are WMDs in your book, no?
Iraq used WMDs in the early 80s. So the USA had to do something about it in 2003? Maybe they could have done something in the 80s? Wait -- they did. Following Saddam's gassing of the Kurds, Reagn/Bush admin did take action -- they increased the amount of aid they were giving him.
The Iraq invasion had nothing to do with WMDs or concern for the Iraqi people
No, these people are just going to keep inciting division among us and never solve any problems. People like Nutztube need to post something of substance for a change.
YES OFC he should.. ALL WHITE NATION leaders .. should be hanged for the last 100 years ...they fucked the world.. WHITE People should be fucking eliminated
vicomatre 1 year ago
@vicomatre You, sir, are racist, ignorant, and an antichrist.
The promotion of violence through violence only encourages people like Osama Bin Laden.
Dictator300 1 year ago
@Dictator300 Go fuckyourself ...
terrroist american piece of shit
vicomatre 1 year ago
@vicomatre Hahahahahahahahahahahahaha!!!!!!
I stand corrected.
Dictator300 1 year ago
@Dictator300 YOu stand terrorist.. bitch
vicomatre 1 year ago
@vicomatre All white people should be eliminated? They why are you in Norway? haha. Seems like the wrong place to live with that attitude. You might be liable to seeing a white person every day! The horror! Why don't you fuck off and go back to where you came from.
nothing980454 9 months ago
Sorry to nitpick, but shouldn't the title say Youtube - Blair thinks he should be hung over Iraq?
I don't know. I'm not an expert English teacher. LOL
dylandior123 2 years ago
@dylandior123
When referring to the act of execution the word 'hang' strangely takes the form 'hanged', in all other cases it would be 'hung'.
kzearo 2 years ago 3
How odd. Fair enough! :)
dylandior123 2 years ago
hung is the past participle, hanged is the imperfect
summer9380 2 years ago
Blair supports chopping hands off because it is part of 'their culture'. Why did he not use the same kind of logic for Iraq? Ethnical cleansing was part of THEIR culture! Seriously, what was the difference between the tyrannic regime of Iraq and the tyrannic regime of Saudi Arabia? You guessed it! The latter collaborated on oil...
BlairPsychopath 3 years ago
"what was the difference between the tyrannic regime of Iraq and the tyrannic regime of Saudi Arabia?"
The tyrannical Saudi regime had never possessed, sought or USED weapons of mass destruction.
The tyrannical Saudi regime was not at war with our country in recent history and thus directly hostile.
The Saudi regime did not itself actively harbour terrorists.
The Saudi regime had not committed genocide and proven itself to be led by a REAL psychopath.
Blair a psychopath? Idiocy.
SelfImmolator 3 years ago
Let's take it one step at a time:
1. The tyrannical Saudi regime had never possessed, sought or USED weapons of mass destruction. - Neither had Iraq, as has been proven.
2. The tyrannical Saudi regime was not at war with our country in recent history and thus directly hostile. - Saudi Arabia has been at war with Yemen (not to mention, with its own citizens).
BlairPsychopath 3 years ago
3. The Saudi regime did not itself actively harbour terrorists. - Neither did Iraq. In fact, if anything, Saddam was unreasonably harsh on terrorist as compared to the actions of the Western governments.
4. The Saudi regime had not committed genocide and proven itself to be led by a REAL psychopath. - I agree with you on that. I hope chopping people's heads off in the middle of the city to terrify the rest of the population into submissiveness does not amount to terrorism.
BlairPsychopath 3 years ago
I don't know why you think Saddam was 'unreasonably harsh' on terrorists. He was an active terrorist-supporter. He even came to let Zarqawi operate freely.
Implying that Blair is a psychopath, you already show yourself to be something of an idiot lacking perspective.
But when you say that Iraq has been proven to never have possessed, sought or ever used weapons of mass destruction... you show yourself to be utterly ignorant of historical facts. Go read a history book. Or at least wiki Saddam.
SelfImmolator 3 years ago
We have no proof of Zarqawi being linked with Saddam, and Wikipedia is not a viable means of information since its edited made by anyone.
Boxcutter7 3 years ago
Israel possesses, seeks, and uses WMDs with some regularity.
oldjoe5 3 years ago
"Israel possesses, seeks, and uses WMDs with some regularity."
Refer me to one example of Israel using weapons of mass destruction (chemical, biological or nuclear). Otherwise shut your ignorant mouth. It is one thing to be wrong about an issue, it's far worse to just fabricate events to support your position.
SelfImmolator 3 years ago
Take it easy. Facts that are at odds with your favorable view of Israel should not make you angry at me, but rather at Israel.
How about the dropping of thousands of cluster bombs on the civilians of Lebanon in 2006? How about their pushing the use of nuclear "bunker busters" against Iran?
oldjoe5 3 years ago
"How about the dropping of thousands of cluster bombs on the civilians of Lebanon in 2006? How about their pushing the use of nuclear "bunker busters" against Iran?"
These are the best you can come up with for examples of Israel using weapons of mass destruction? Weapons that aren't WMD and something that has not even happened (yet)? Of course that's all you have.
It's inconvenient for you but Israel hasn't used WMD.
SelfImmolator 3 years ago
Cluster bombs resulting in the deaths (so far) of over 1,000 civilians are no WMD? They aren't weapons? The deaths are not deaths? Or maybe over 1000 is not mass enuff for your definition?
How about the nuclear weapons Israel is hoping to use -- those "bunker busters".. Those don't qualify?
Yet those amateur rockets hamas fired are WMDs in your book, no?
oldjoe5 3 years ago
how about the use of phosphorus shells that burn flesh on contact? Is that enough chemical warfare for you?
jamal22066 3 years ago
Iraq used WMDs in the early 80s. So the USA had to do something about it in 2003? Maybe they could have done something in the 80s? Wait -- they did. Following Saddam's gassing of the Kurds, Reagn/Bush admin did take action -- they increased the amount of aid they were giving him.
The Iraq invasion had nothing to do with WMDs or concern for the Iraqi people
oldjoe5 3 years ago 13
Listen to this message: or rather, watch the vid below. :) x
"All what you should know about N.E.S.A.R.A."
watch zeitgeist the movie too, it's really good!
imsowealthy 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
if people keep on making these fakes the governments gonna fuckem up
InternetFTW 4 years ago
No, these people are just going to keep inciting division among us and never solve any problems. People like Nutztube need to post something of substance for a change.
m0rbidh0rr0r 3 years ago
This is fantastic a rare piece of footage of the young Tony Blair catching him out as usual!
Blackadder1941 4 years ago
Are these videos from NutzTube edited?
IrrigatedPancake 4 years ago
Yep
RJT 4 years ago
wtf
bayerischerzustand 4 years ago