Added: 3 years ago
From: TheYoungTurks
Views: 125,193
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (1,785)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Bill seems to be pretty mad that there are children that do not have proper housing, parenting, and basic needs. He talks about the state doing little to nothing to help. He is angry and full of rage. Kind of silly for him to be so upset over one case when there are millions of children that live out there that have both parents and no other siblings who are starving. He needs to realize that there are many more kids out there in America and it's not a fantisy world. Maybe he should wake up

  • I agree with Billy. Turks are too Middle Eastern. They don't get people like Billy.

  • Comment removed

  • oh here we go again with dumbass cenk trying to defend a "mother" who is completely nuts that is doing unbelivable unacceptable things trying to pass it off as "we cant tell parents how to raise their kids". well cenk, as i recall the authorities DID take some of her kids away, and as i recall the authorities DID take the crazy woman who forced hot sauce into her kids mouth away, which you were also defending for having the right to raise her kids however she sees fit.

  • Bill-O is right.

  • Comment removed

  • she admitted to doing drugs, is very religious, was very cosy with an abusive doctor, have ivf for what, 5, 6 kids and when they were all classified as disabled she goes back to the doc for 8 more with the soul intention of exploiting the children for her own media image. it backfired when it showed everyone how immature and abusive she was. but if youre gonna make kids suffer and make them feel the fear of god then your local pedaphile church will get you as many kids as you want in america.

  • Too funny how a lot of us agree with Bill'O on this one. Never happened before. LOL!

  • This video pisses me off because it makes me want to admit I...

    I... I agr, (wait, I can say it)

    I, I... I agree...

    I agree with Bill O Reilly.

    Holy crap, I feel so dirty just saying that. Must get clean, must get clean. Can't sleep, clown will eat me...

    WTF! I agree with O Reilly(?)

  • @TruthinessDotCom you agree with taking away kids from parents with no evidence of abuse? everybody that has been around her says she is a good mom.you kind of need evidence to support you opinion.she acts crazy as hell,but thats not a crime.i think children raised in religion are being abused.i need evidence of actual abuse before i can say their kids need to be taken away.

  • Pretty sure its a false dichotomy Cenk not a straw man.

  • @Camponhoyle nah, strawman was correct. 

  • @Camponhoyle

    Misrepresentation of your opponent's position is a straw man.

  • we can sell 'em!!!

  • Dude Cenk I actually agree with O'Reilly here man!

  • I must concur. I also agree with Bill, I am ashamed to say. Besides not having any money, there is no way that that mother can emotionally nurture 14 kids, especially without a father (or another mother) or anyone else in the picture. And she thinks she is going to have enough money to raise 14 kids AFTER she gets her master's degree. First of all, how freaking naive. Second of all.... you should have money to raise your kids BEFORE you have them, not after. Horrible, irresponsible mother.

  • Oh shit do i actually agree with Bill O for the first time ?

  • If these kids were black this son of bitch would be screaming about welfare without any concern for these kids !What she did is stupid and the doctor is crazy !

  • lol i agrree with billl

  • Why don't you have them aborted then Bill?

  • Well everyone thought 14 kids was riduclous, and justice was served, the fertility Dr was banned of his lic this week!!! I agree with Bill here but hate the way he typlicall arranges his arguments, Jon Stewart kicks Bill's but in all debates.

  • 0:50

  • Bill-O is a dildo

  • She is hurting us, SHE'S TAKING OUR TAX MONEY BECAUSE SHE LIKES SHOOTING BABIES OUT OF HER FUCKING LOOSE VAGINA.

  • AS much as bill is a dick head.....I agree with him 110% on this!!!

  • These two hosts are incredibly stupid. They make Bill look like a genius. ppl who base their entire lives on character attack admit they actually have no lives.

  • These two should be called the Young TURDS...what a couple of imbeciles.

  • The world is overpopulated by 6 Billion too many people. People should have less kids.

  • I grew up in a rundown 2 bedroom house with 14 kids, most my cousins, and we only lived with my retired grandmother until I was 15...<.<

  • @prettycolors2 congratulations

  • Bill-O is a moron, but he's attempting to make a good point. (He just sucks at it.)

  • lady must look like a hippo mouth

  • You would have to be insane to have 14 childrens and be a single mother...

  • That one in the middle is obviously an idiot. Fucking swipe that grin off your face you dumb bitch. Courtney Pilchman, your an idiot and give the human race a bad rep. Go to hell woman, i feel bad for your kids and husband.

  • So Ana doesn't want authorities to take the Octomom's children away for having eight at once without a financial support system, but she's fine with authorities in England taking away overweight children from their obese mother for feeding them McDonald's every day?

  • Ana is gorgeous ;)

  • 14 kids 3 bedroom apt. no income no hubby no way to support them other than welfare that's why no one bitches about the tv show having white people that do this shit they have large homes and a lot of income so yeah Sarcia for once he was right and the only reason you disagree is because you are mexican like the worthless octobitch is so you also need to stfu

  • Team O'Reilly!

  • I like how sometimes, Bill just stops saying words and shouts angrily. "HARUMPH!"

  • @HitoshiK9 it's harrumph

  • you shouldn't be able to get 8 kids at once from fertility clinics, if it happens naturally whatever, but that seems incredibly dangerous to do that and not have a hope in hell of taking care of them. you may be able to feed them but they will grow up missing soo much.  O Reilly is retarded though, lets not lose sight of that.

  • Yeah Bill O'Reilly needs to choke on a piece of ham steak

    I am on his side this time though.

  • He's completely idiot. but he is right this time.

    14 babies? wtf? that's not responsible. And without responsability their mother can't be a good mother.

  • WTF? Is she insane? A pound and a half baby can't possibly survive in a three bedroom apartment. All her kids will probably die a horrible three bedroom apartment death. Someone should lynch her right now!!!

  • someone should throw this dick out of a helicopter deep into Helmand province, protect your country now BILL .............a severed head would be preferable. right wing tosser

  • POUND AND A HALF BABEH!

  • If they have the means, fine.

    if not take em away. all there is to it.

  • What the hell does Billo mean "allow herself to give birth"?

  • he is funny as shit !!!!! Best entertainer !

  • Sometimes I agree with O'Reilly, but I can't stand the way that he presents himself. Well, he's better than Beck, though, at least O'Reilly lets the guests speak a little.

  • bill is a jackass but he is dead right. im not christian but i gotta agree that if you cant get pregnant from a PENIS like everyone else then your shit out of luck. ITS CALLED ADDOPTION. AND FUCK NO YOU CANT ADDOPT 14 KIDS.

  • I wonder if he thought "abortion" was ok in THIS situation?...

  • I agree with Bill, this mother is mentally ill. We cannot produce kids like that.

  • If it's irresponsible,take some of her kids away.Another solution is to appropriate my tax dollars to take care of those kiss,so that a few of them have a chance to change this fucked up world.You can't eject 14 kids,it's just too irresponsible and she should consider birth control pills,or get an abortion.If you can't afford it,don't risk it.

  • Comment removed

  • i hate and loath families like the duggars because first off, its not necessary to have THAT many kids! second, thats the leading cause to over-population and third, how in hell can you afford having twenty kids!!! i say the government should make a law which limits the amount of kids a family could have which is (2 maxium). and if families wants more than 2 then they should have paper work and legal document that says, "i can afford and take care of this child". DUGGARS YOU DISGUST ME

  • I really dislike O'Reilly but on principle he is undeniably right here. I get sick of this grossly irresponsible attitude that having x number of kids is a human right. The irony of course is that the kids themselves are often disadvantaged. Sure, it's hard to formulate a strategy within a progressive context but this kind of behaviour should be strongly discouraged by those on the left and right. Education is undoubtedly one way of overcoming it.

  • "do whatever the hell you want country" = "land of opportunity"

    And O'Reilly is an opportunist.

    If he didn’t live in the "do whatever the hell you want country", he would be unemployed.

    I would be able to counter O'Reilly on Anything he says. He is a pathetic debater really. His strawmen are obvious, his arguments outquoted, and his style is lacking.

    He gesticulates a lot and screams even more, like some castrate cat trying to make kittens in an alley only to release the phantom pains.

  • Kind of agree with Bill-O here for once. Monoparental with 14 babies? fuck

  • @mattsnow81  Yeah its fucked up. But - perhaps the fertility clinic should have their license to practice revoked. As far as taking the kids away, do you want to live in a country that decides how many kids you can have based on how much money you have and whether you're married or not? I'll tell you what that country is called - China.

  • If Bill O'Reich actually managed to stick his peepee in every woman he'd tried it with, he'd have a hundred kids by now (particularly as he wants rape conceptions to be denied abortions)

  • O'reilly is a fucking nut.

  • Cenk, the problem is that she is hurting people. She is hurting the kids. She still has no money, even after the books, movies and shows that never happened. It IS our business because we live in a society which has made it clear that we watch out for the well-being of others. That is why we have public schools with standards on curriculum, social security for senior citizens and the disabled, food stamps, welfare, etc. It IS our business.

  • Comment removed

  • @xJoeEDangerouslyx

    Are you sure you want to set a precedent which states that the lives of people on welfare are other people's business? Where does this end?

  • What is O'Reilly's point here? Moreover, the Young Turks should mind their own business. This matter is nobody's business.

  • @blacksamcooke And to your point, TYT has every right to comment on this story. They are, in fact, agreeing with you. Commenting on a publicly shown broadcast is not tantamount to sticking your nose in someone else's business. They are two entirely different things. It is nobody's business how I voted last Tuesday, but if I announced it on someone's air, and someone commented on it, they would not be in my business, they would simply be commenting on a piece of information in the public sphere.

  • this is a good example as to why humans don't have litters.

  • You got it right. She is the ultimate lying, defrauding,POS!

  • She couldn't do anything for Bill-O not to get mad at her for, she coulda got an abortion, he woulda called her a baby killer, if she gave em away he prolly woulda said something about splitting but the octuplets, she keeps em, he whines that she has 14 kids. Bill just wants to bitch about any and everything, that's the only way he could ever get views with his crackhead "facts". He's just a joke.

  • @woody0900, what scares me is I kind of agree with Bill, for once. This is bullshit, 14 kids packed into a 3 bedroom house with a woman capitalizing on that? Sorry, that is bad parenting. I'd argue that 14 kids in a 4 bedroom home is a form of abuse and neglect. How can she possibly give attention to all these kids? What kind of life will they have?

  • Bill's Catholic! The Church that thinks a vagina's a clown car!

  • Another issue is the social security and medicare tax problem. The generation of WWII had a ton of children (the baby boomers). So you had a huge body of people to pay for the retirement of the war generation. But then as the baby boomers got old, who pays for them? The baby "buster" generation (Gen X) was smaller. Same with Y, iirc. So in that sense, you want people to have more kids to grow up to be workers and tax payers to keep the previous generation in care. right?

  • I say, if you can raise your kids and give them a healthy shot at life, have as many as you want...

  • @XSC3 I say, there are already far too many people walking this planet, and people need to be responsible about it.

    Scary part... the people who seem to breed the most are [for lack of a better word] DUMB.

  • @LemUUU by "Dumb," you don't mean "poor, lower class or uneducated"?

    Because for some reason whenever population control stuff gets mandated, it's always the rich and powerful who get to have kids and fool around, while the poor, minorities and lower class get sterilized or have the forced abortions. I'm just saying. if you think the population is "too big" (arbitrary), don't have kids yourself, I guess.

  • @XSC3 By dumb, I meant people with a low IQ, or no common sense. (or religious fanatics)

    I wasn't saying population control by sterilization, or extermination, but by a system of rewards/penalties. People need to be encouraged to have less children, instead of handing out large tax credits for extra children. Yes its arbitrary, but do you think this planet has unlimited resources?

  • @LemUUU ah, but you've no evidence that they have "low IQ" do you? You're simply judging them. "Common sense" according to what? Anyway, it seems like there are plenty of people that do stupid things who are wealthy and/or famous. Upper class people are just as "dumb" then as poor, lower class people.

    I don't think this planet has "unlimited resources" but I don't think human intervention in population control will make a lick of difference, except make life on this planet more unbearable.

  • @LemUUU I'm glad you're not in favor of sterilization. I say anybody who is for that ought to start with the upper class elites and the wealthy (those folks who accumulate wealth and are a strain on the rest of the world, and pass it on to their offspring). if you can get them to do it to themselves, cool beans, maybe the rest of us will follow.

  • @LemUUU the way to control population is to get people's sexual behavior under control. yet for some reason that's a terrible thing to say. instead it always comes out to making poor people use birth control and have abortions. I just think people are dumping the "problem" off on the powerless. It's not as if poor men are the only ones running around sleeping with multiple women and having children out of wedlock (and they aren't paying for all of them to become responsible citizens, are they?)

  • @XSC3 Trying to get sexual behaviour under control is impossible, it is a biological drive to have sex. I said nothing about poor people or rich people. Or anything about wedlock, its all about the population growth, no 1 child policies, no sterilization, just honest sensibility. Fewer children also means that the parents can be more attentive with them which is a win win if I am not mistaken. One more thing, fewer children takes some of the stress off the aged inefficient school system too.

  • Thank god my tax dollars don't support these morons and their 18 kids.

    I hate O'reilly, with a passion, he's an arrogant egotistical cumshot with the equivalent intelligence of a bag of hammers, but for ONCE

    I completely agree with him, these people who can't support the kids they HAVE deliberately going out to have more that the government will eventually have to help pay for with tax-payers dollars, should be euthanised.

    Same goes for those john & kate morons, and anyone else that stupid.

  • I dislike Bill but on this one he his spot on!

  • Hey, I live in ´Dowhateverthellyouwannado´, Greetings from Idontgivecraps-Ville!!

  • what should she have gotten an abortion? you fucking cock sucking hypocrite oreilly. shut the fuck up, stop yelling your bullshit

  • oreilly gets it right for change

  • The irony is that Billy O'Wryly is a devout pro-lifer. What if she had accidentally gotten pregnant with these children?

  • i gotta agree with um on this one.

  • I guess this ultra libbie broad Courtney only considers anything short of smacking the shit out of your kids as "being a good mom".

  • i dont think that she should have had that many kids but hes just a dumb ass we really dont have proff shes not a good mom

  • octomom is a fuckin dumbass and a psycho she just having kids cuz no sane man will be around her lmao

  • @TheYellabone101 nope man she is just doing it for tha money -.- and whit that said what a bitch

  • @TheYellabone101 Actually there's one guy who WANTS to marry her, but she doesn;t wanna marry him.... But his sperm was used for all the kids.

  • @TriaMaxwell,oh come on... there's no proof in that.

  • So any families that have premature babies are family that neglect their child? O'Reilly is such a dumb arse.

  • i dunni, i kinda agree with him. but i still hate him.

  • O'Railey need to STFU! He's not saying anything about the Duggar, Hayes and Gosselin who are using their kids, exploiting them for money on TV. Having two kids and wanting one more, having 18 kids and wanting one more, having 4 kids and wanting one more that's acceptable, but having six kids and wanting one more isn't? Only reason why the families I've mention isn't on food stamps is because they have a reality show, unlike Nadya Suleman. Don't excuse that they are all white, go figure!

  • @MsSarcia Those are bad people too. I wonder if Mr. Dugger thinks he's throwing a hot dog down the hall way. 

  • @MsSarcia

    difference is those other couples were not broke like she is and had help.

  • @mlking213 they weren't rich either. And who said Nadya was broke? She may not have been rich but she wasn't dirt poor or homeless.

  • @MsSarcia

    She is broke.....Lost her house,Went bankrupt,lives with her mom and dad in a small home,and the father isnt around at all.

    Only reason she wasnt homeless is because she has parents.......what do you call that?

    Now on to those other families......they had two parents,huge family to help them,some sort of savings,regardless if the government help them they would be okay....totally different situation for Nadya...stop putting race into this.

  • Kate Gosselin did not have a huge families, she had nannies and her brother and sister inlaw to help before she fired everybody once the money started rolling in. As for the Duggar they used their eldest girls as nannies to care for all their siblings and still do to this day. And there but the grace of God goes the Gosselin, Duggar, Hayes and Masche families if wasn't for TV reality shows. Stop reading tabloids and get the facts from the horses mouth.

  • That the house wasn't fit for the infants... therefore she had no choice but to find a new home in order for her to bring her babies home from the hospital. Which lead to the house in La Harbra a home she's in now and paying the monthly mortgage. I also like to add that Nadya never lived with her mother, Nadya mother had her own house that went into foreclosure, she moved in with NADYA after Nadya went into the hospital to have her octuplets.

  • @mlking213 Nadya was not broke and she did not lose her house. Yes her mother owe money on the house in Whittier, Nadya was going to pay that and fix the house up for the octuplet home coming, but was told the house wasn't big enough to accommodate 14 kids and her. 

  • Nadya moved in with Nadya and the kids while Nadya was at the hospital having her babies. Keep listening to the mainstream media's and tabloid junkies. They will have your head all twisted and turned upside down. Angela had several homes that went into foreclosure because she stop paying the mortgages, something that was totally Angela fault, not Nadya. Seriously, a teacher retirement check and social security check paying the mortgages on several houses? Right!

  • @mlking213 and to break it down even more... The house in Whittier that Nadya was living in with her six kids belonged to her mother. Nadya moved in it and was paying her mother rent. Nadya mom (Angela) at the time did not live with Nadya, she was living in another home she owned and that house went into foreclosure. Nadya was going in to have her octuplets and asked her mother to care for her six kids along with a nanny that Nadya had hired.

  • @MsSarcia

    LOl your saying she had 14 kids and never even had a home of her own?

    Smart move Nadya I hope you know that you are making a case against her and not for her.

    explain to me where you see her(Nadya) situation better or on par with those other families that had some means of support....Explain to me how living with your mom and dad when you have fourteen kids doesn't make you poor?

  • mlking, I said; Nadya had a home of her own, (The Whittier house). It was just Nadya and her 6 kids. A home her mother rented out to Nadya to live in. Understand that no one lived there with Nadya, but her kids. Elijah, Amerah, Joshua AKA JJ, Aiden, and 2-year-old twins Calyssa and Caleb. No friends, no parents, no boyfriends, no nannies. Just Nadya and her kids up until the day she went into the hospital to have her octuplets. Are we clear on that now?

  • Explain? Kate and Nadya are both divorce, single parents raising large number of kids. Kate exploit her kids for money, Nadya exploit herself for money. Kate had two kids and wanted one more and got six instead. Shit happens right? Well Nadya wanted one more and got eight instead. Kate and Nadya both went through fertility treatments. Nadya lost her job due to an accident, Kate lost her job because she quit to be a stay at home unemployed mom. Both lived in a small three bedroom homes.

  • Kate and Nadya both had jobs before they let the jobs go. Kate was struggling and she nor Jon were rich. They were just barely making it with the twins and Jon said he never wanted to have more kids but it was something Kate wanted. Like Nadya, kate and Jon had nannies, friends, church and Kate brother and sister inlaw to help her with her 8 kids. Until the show blew up and the money started rolling in. Kate fired everybody and brought a mansion, started living the rich and famous lifestyle.

  • Now granted Kate and Jon weren't on food stamps or SSI but that's only because Jon was working at the time and TLC came along and pick up the slack. Kate convince Jon to stop working and stay at home with her and the kids, they figure they'll get rich off the kids and that's exactly what they done. Otherwise there but the grace of God like I said before, goes Jon and Kate on welfare. They couldn't make it without TLC. They know it, I know it and so do you mlking.

  • Duggar home was built/furnished free of charge. He did not do it alone! It was only after taking on TLC step in that you now see the Duggar driving around with all these luxury vehicles, going on free invited trips etc. Duggar kids are now adults and still living at home with their mommy and daddy raising their siblings for their parents. Same thing you claimed Nadya was doing with her parents. FYI-- Nadya didn't have 14 kids and she never lived with her parents and she never claimed to be poor.

  • Let me clear that up... she never had 14 kids when she was living at the Whittier address. She was pregnant and moved out of that house before the octuplets were release from the hospital. Therefore she only had six kids and herself to depend on and her parents weren't living with her at the time and they are not living with her now. Got it?

  • mlking, about the Duggars. Granted they claimed to never had been on food stamps and SSI too. We only have their word on this and JB took on all kinds of odd/various jobs to support his large brood, but keep in mind they weren't rich. They lived in a 2 bedroom one bath home with 14 kids plus themselves. That's 16 people in a 2BR1bath house. JB sold everything he had, cars, business and the money he made as gov. and brought the land to which TLC, sponsor etc help build the Duggar home on.

  • @MsSarcia

    she has no help,its more about the money, its that its all babies same age.

  • @mlking213 so what, isn't Kate 6 kids all the same age and a couple years younger then her twins? Duggar kids are stairs steps. Nadya had plenty of help, she had free help with Kaiser nannies in the beginning then later hired her own set of Nannies, AIW stepped in, she got rid of them and she and her hired nannies, friends and family members raise those kids wonderfully going on two years now. See up date photos of the kids on my channel. they're clean, healthy and well taking care of. :)

  • @MsSarcia You make a good point about the family with 18 kids, but...

    You say bill should stfu because he didn't say enough? He should stfu but he should also talk about the family with 18 kids?

    Is having 6 kids and wanting 1 more acceptable? Sure, if you can provide for them. Going bankrupt then deciding to have more kids right away isn't a good idea. It's not good for society and it's especially not good for the kids.

  • They have a reality TV show because they can't support any of those kids' without it. But soon as Nadya want to try and do something to earn quick cash. Everyone jumps on this poor woman and accuse of her of having kids to exploit them and putting them to work. WTH do they think every single last families on TLC are doing? Nadya is trying real hard to stay off food stamps and disability going on 2 yrs now and still going. If Bill going to attack Nadya, then why not attack TLC families as well?

  • that said, I don't care for "reality TV" and I won't be watching it. but as long as there is a market for it, exploit away. unless she's abusing or neglecting the kids, we may think she's a nut, but we can't do anything about it

  • Then you have the fact that certain countries (like Japan and Italy) have declining population, such that if they don't start having more immigration or step up people's fertility now, they'll be "dead" in a few generations. Then you have other countries (covered on Youngturks already) like China where one child policies have lead to massive abortions and infanticide of girl babies, making for an aging majority male population.

  • @MsSarcia Give me a break.

    Suleman was unemployed, living with her parents and barely putting food on the table. So what does she do? Gets a student loan that she can't repay to go have a litter of kids for attention rather than, oh I don't know, using it for school to get a fucking job.

    And let's not forget the money she pissed away on that awful plastic surgery she got to look like Angelina Jolie and then denied it like everyone is fucking blind.

    And she wants even more kids....

  • But the fact remains, TLC has these families, Latino/White with sextuplets, Hayes/Gosselin and they all wanted 1 more baby and got 6. Hayes, Latino & Gosselin already had kid's before they had more fertility treatments. They all have reality TV show now because they can't take care these kids without it. And the same applies to the Duggar's.

  • @MsSarcia maybe the solution is to ban fertility treatments and encourage adoptions? nah, people need to have their own biological children, and that's where the money is, I guess...

    She's irresponsible sure, but her children don't need to suffer for it. I don't think exploiting her media fame now is a bad thing if it helps the kids. better than being a welfare mom and forcing the government to pick up the check (via taxpayers), right?

  • The resource problem is not so much as our ability to produce resources, but in their equitable distribution. the first world uses more of the resources, but has fewer of the people (concentrated wealth). I'm not a socialist, I'm just pointing out a well known fact. wars and revolutions make it all the more sticky.

  • @XSC3, Nadya is not on any kind of government assistance and hasn't been going on two years. She's been out there doing any and every odd jobs she could think of to secure income to feed, clothes and shelter her family without becoming a burden to taxpayers. She even went as far as having a yard sale while turning down disgusting job offers that would shame herself as well as her family. She's a good mother, a humanbeing who made a bad decision and she's dealing with it on her own, without help.

  • @XSC3, Nadya choices after finding out she couldn't bare kids on her own the natural way, was through fertility, legal adoption and using a surrogate. But because of her current situation at the time part time school/work. The agency wouldn't have allow her to adopt and who would she get to surrogate? The state can't stop a woman from having her own kids and that is what Nadya deperately wanted. She saved every cent she had to make her dreams of becoming a mother a reality after her divorce.

  • @urantivirus, I understand what you're saying. I don't excuse or condone what Nadya's done to bring life to her embyro's rather then to destroy or give them away because she couldn't afford to keep them in stores.

  • @MsSarcia, I disagree. Having 5 kids is NOT acceptable any more. We are a planet that is choking on human beings right now. Us all mushing together, fucking, fighting, spitting on each other, shitting on each other (metaphorically, for the most part). It's too much, there's too many of us. If we keep reproducing at this rate we're going to lower the value of the human being and take away the precious few resources we have left.

    Replace yourself and your partner, if you need more, adopt!

  • @hoboboxerjoe what do you mean not acceptable? Are you going to tell women what they can and can't do with their bodies now? Are we going to limited the number of kids a woman can have?

    "fucking, fighting, spitting, shitting on each other" One would argue that's the act of the devil and poor upbringing, but has nothing to do with the miracle of life itself?

  • @MsSarcia overpopulation is dangerous, personally i think all people should be restricted to 2

  • @TheBighairyfart Yeah its frustrating though when you talk about this subject.Poeple tend to think youre crazy. I agree

  • I think the man in this toyota commercial gave his nuts and his spine to his wife as a wedding gift. What's up with commercials today and the weak  men in them?

  • Wow, this makes me hate bill'o a little less, he hit the nail on the head on this one!

  • O'Reilly you are correct. A woman who has little to no money having that man damn kids is NOT an OK thing.

  • Have you guys made enough money to buy one more wireless mic?

  • I'm on Bill's side with this one

  • Isn't Bill a Catholic? And he's complaining about large families.

  • Why should the children be taken away from a woman who clearly has mental issues, and deliberately brought those children into the world to make a profit off of them?

    Is that what you're asking?

    Because I think the answer is pretty clear.

  • probably have to go to public school and live a relatively not so great life. That is more clothing and food that is spread out between the extra children.

  • I'm sorry but she had far too many kids. Our population is almost at seven billion, 97% of the new billion coming are from the third world. The more children one has, the more the family resources will be spread out. If you make $100,000 a year and have one kid, you could have a comfortable life and even send them to private school. You would even qualify for financial aid at some places since you make less then $150,000 a year. If you made $100,000 and had six children they would...

  • "... allows herself to give birth to eight more children..."

    Gee, the way Bill puts it, he almost suggests that she should have aborted them. Isn't he a conservative Christian who condemns abortion as murder who works for a right-wing news corporation OOPS I MEAN unbiased secularist who works for an unbiased secular news corporation?

  • Well, atleast Bill knows that he can't win an argument with knowledge and cunning alone. He needs to shout at the other person to get his point across, he doesn't know any other way to argue.

  • I'm gonna be the bad guy here, but on one hand, no, we shouldn't take her kids away from her until we can prove that they're endangered.

    At the same time, no one should be giving her money, it sets a bad principal. they're more or less saying "go ahead, have a crap load of kids, we'll give you money for it"

    This is just a scam, if she had no children and then had 8 I'd be like "okay, she didn't see this coming" but the reality is just disgusting.

  • She's had the kids already, she needs the money otherwise the kids'll go into homes. How can you wish that on somebody? Let her have the money for gods sakes. It doesnt matter! Theres people in wall street earning like 800 billion a year for doing aboslutely nothing. The extra cash will help this woman RAISE 14 PEOPLE. Not dolls .. PEOPLE. ACTUAL HUMAN BEINGS. WHO NEEDS FOOD, WATER, HEALTH CARE, EDUCATION ETC.. That shit costs enuff with only one child. Times that price by 14.

  • First time I agree with Bill..

    If the lady was black or hispanic, racist comments would be all over this comment board. You cowards

  • normalisforlosers -

    TRUE!!!! thanks for saying it!!!

  • rack smack baseball-twat

  • I always wonderd why Americans were so damn slow.......After finding out Bill O'Reillys took seriously-Everything makes sense!!!!

  • takeall of her kids away, thats my opinion

    she is not finacially or mentally stable

    i feel bad for the kids

  • fuck you check your comment page

  • What fuck is wrong with selling babys?

  • do whatever you want land? i thought that was america anyway also how the hell is he acturally aloud on tv

  • AMERICAN DREAMS ? Bill O'Reilly had the audience in tears, stunned or even hysterically laughing. Bill was certainly fresh, and YEAHHHHHHH bold

  • This woman is essentially hoarding kids, like some people do with cats and dogs. In animal cases, if it gets excessive, the humaine society intervenes.

    Even if she does get money from the media, it won't last, as the public loses interest.

    That many children packed into such a small space; a single mother, with only 24hrs in one day; and where are these kids while she's giving interviews?

    She should be concentrating on the children she has, instead of always wanting more, more, more...

  • lol @ 2:32 "is that a country?"

  • so true!!!! Check out "My mommy is OCTO-MOM" on youtube.

  • Here is an idea, cut out all the pointless rambling bullshit from those "hosts" and then this video wont totally suck.

  • put the kids in a foster home and kick that bitch out the country! fuck that dumb bitch

  • Yeah I totally agree! I feel so bad for those poor kids.

  • your a racist why should we  even read your dumb ass comment

  • first off, how am i a racist? second, in order to find out if it was a dumbass comment or not u would, in fact, need to read it right?

  • so yea how am i a racist... try maybe explaining urself u asshole

  • well,we havent been living in america ever since abortion,genius!"care about these children"psh...plz

  • umm, abortion is not new, its been around long before america. psh...plz

  • Omg I actually liked Bill O'Reilly in this video.

  • that ana broad is damn sexy!