Added: 7 months ago
From: InsideLineVideo
Views: 186,269
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (1,728)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • It looked you could lose control on a corner

  • does it come with a cassette player and a cigarette lighter?

  • Comment removed

  • IRS, please!

  • @gnarStache 2013 does havwe independant rear suspension

  • Comment removed

  • yeah, I'd still want a Rousch instead of this thing...

  • who thinks this whole retro thing is old now and they should make a completely new from the ground up mustang?

  • The 2013 GT 500 seems like the handling is spot on, like it is on a rail. It stays glued to the track unlike previous year models; which looked like they were in a drifting competition going around the track. This car has been totally rethought by Ford engineers, from aerodynamics to gearing. It is going to be a competitor in all areas.

  • @jmdoby i agree to an extent, but you have to understand that the car you are seeing its prepped for the ring and its not necessarily what you will see on the road. ford has been doing some great things with the newer mustangs (all trim levels) and i am impressed. i just hope that this doesnt turn out like the muscle car era fro, the 60's - 70's hopefully cars like this will stick around for awhile.

  • It always does look the same just more power i guess...

  • it looks exactly the same

  • @laceup10 they just redesigned the car for 2010... 2013 isnt gonna be a new body style. you gonna have to wait untill the middle of 2015 for a new style.

  • @laceup10 That's because its in the same generation of the 2011....

  • @ken0is0gay0fan0club i am guessing you havent heard of fords eco boost ? turbos are the way to go! i rode in a twin turbo gt500 and car was just sick

  • Twin Turbo or "EcoBoost²" GT500 would be EPIC!!

  • What is everyone's thoughts on the cheap looking grey plastic panels on the bottom edge of the mustang?

  • it don't matter if its a supercharger or turbo its still a beast its prob a turbo but it in a way sounds supercharged unless it was sitting still then it would have the whistle sound

  • @hilde198881 Yea it was obviously supercharged, the gt500 has a distinctive whine! Plus Ford would never turbocharge a production American car! That would just be blasphemy

  • @ken0is0gay0fan0club actually alot of car companies are moving to turbo's, it's the best way to meet the new CAFE standards while keeping up in the HP race. Look at BMW's new 3.0 TT, it gets 30+mpg easy and has 350hp. Chevy is considering a small displacement twin turbo v8 for its next engine I hear.

  • @kmk408ci that is true, but mustang camaro and corvette fans would never let that happen

  • He asked if it sounded like a turbo and we all know he was joking.....get over it people. If you know your muscle cars, the whine is only one thing.....

    Rumor had it, Ford was building a turbo to replace the supercharger.....geez.

    The guy has a dry sense of humor and people go craxy!

  • @mxd6 actually it could mean it is gear to gear timing that sounds like that also.......so it can mean 2 things just saying

  • @onewheelwonder1000 We all know late model Shelby's are supercharged. He asks if this 2013 Shelby GT 500 sounds turbo charged. It only means one thing and it's nothing else. It's common sense if you know your vehicles and keep up with the latest technologies. Put simply ....what NEW Ford has gear to gear timing - none.

  • i wish i was a ford test racer :(

  • doesnt the 2013 gt500 have quadruple exhaust!!!!!

    

  • Its already turbocharged this one just has a 5.8 engine to replace the 5.4

  • Ok it is not turbocharged its supercharged second, this is not even close to the old 5.0 or 5.8 they took the 5.4 from last year and bored it out its still a DOHC not pushrod people

  • It has a solid rear axle. Yay, its another american car that goes fast in a straight line. I wish we made cars that took turns too :( Drag racing is fun but in Pennsylvania our roads all have turns

  • @philiscool101 if they improved the new g.t. 500 as much as they improved the new g.t. then it handles twice as good in the bends than last years model.

  • @MrBrandonhurst2008 a solid axle is a solid axle. it will never handle as well as cars with indepentent rear suspensions period.

  • @JendrusZbojnik Wrong, read my post below.

  • @acs4llc yes thats partly true but on uneven surfaces an irs handles better bc it keeps the same contact usually. but over all the irs handles better that includes high speed tracks. all supercars and most sports cars in general have irs, in which most can out handle a stang. then again it depends on the driver and his preference. a car is just a big still object without a driver. I have had just the opposite results on tight tracks and mountains. To each his own though.. ;-)

  • @JendrusZbojnik Uneven surfaces are not good for any suspension type. IRS may have a slight advantage on rough irregular roads but sports cars in general have a hard time on anything but the smoothest of roads. Supercars that have mid or rear engine (or rear trans) require a transaxle/independant. No 2 ways about it. How many of the remaining front engine (and trans) RWDs aren't also luxury performers who's buyers look for IRS b/c it's a luxury car? OK, the Camaro but its Zeta platform was IRS.

  • @acs4llc i know rear trans require a transaxle. but other supercars that or FR have irs. just saying that if the live axles there that great there would of been more common in sport cars in general? There are a couple of pure sport sedans like the evo and sti, but the g8 wasnt built with luxury in mind(also a zeta platform and a rebadged hold). i see your point and your right about in theory of how the live axle should handle. but in reality some drivers dont like the way a live axle

  • @JendrusZbojnik The g8's platform was designed for a range of full-size cars that blend luxury & sporty charactor. LRA doesn't fit that profile. Evos & Stis are based on econo FWD Civic/Corolla type platforms. LRA only fits the profile of the RWD non luxury Mustangs/Camaros/Challengers but the Challenger was based on a Mercedes platform they were done with. I'm not saying LRA is a tremendous advantage at the track but an advantage none the less. The rest are misconceptions & wivetales about LRA.

  • @JendrusZbojnik The g8's platform was designed for a range of full-size cars that blend luxury & sporty charactor. LRA doesn't fit that profile. Evos & Stis are based on econo FWD Civic/Corolla type platforms. LRA only fits the profile of the RWD non luxury Mustangs/Camaros/Challengers but the Challenger was based on a Mercedes platform they were done with. I'm not saying LRA is a tremendous advantage at the track but an advantage none the less. The rest are misconceptions & wivetales about LRA.

  • @acs4llc performs, like me. like i said its realy down to the driver. some like it some dont. To each his own. just my 2 cents and thanks for not making in a brawl over the interweb...

  • @JendrusZbojnik The G8's platform was designed for a range of Aussie full-size cars that blend luxury & spoty charactor. LRA doesn't fit that profile. Evos & Stis are based on econo FWD Civic/Corolla type platforms. LRA only fits the profile of the RWD non luxury Mustangs/Camaros/Challengers but the Challie was based on a Mercedes platform & Camaro the Zeta. I'm not saying LRA is a huge advantage but an advantage none the less. The rest are misconceptions/wivestales/exag­gerations of LRA vs IRS.

  • @acs4llc true forgot the evo and sti are awd. oops lol. none the less your right techically LRA have aadvantage. whether its used or not. lol

  • @JendrusZbojnik *sporty character

  • @philiscool101 Live axles are faster around a track than IRS especially on tighter courses with lots of hairpins and quick elevation changes. The more a suspension gets compressed or unloaded, the worse it is on an IRS car's contact patch. The fatter and lower profile the tires get, the more they need to stay flat on the pavement as opposed to riding on the beads. This gives live axles a clear advantage on the technical stuff, without a doubt. On high speed turns and straights, it's a wash.

  • @acs4llc By live axle do you mean solid rear axle or are you talking about something else? sorry i just havnt heard that term before

  • @Chadb89 Solid and live axles are the same.

  • @acs4llc Ok gotcha

  • GT500 turbo charged??? highly doubt that!!!

  • its does 200 mph+, ford finally got it... the funny thing is that American cars are beating the competition on the tracks now, The Z06 is murdering cars 2x the price by bus lengths

  • I know that sound....the whining of the supercharger....gets...mee...h­ard

  • its a 351 5.8L motor with an upgraded supercharger putting out 12psi of boost. badass written all over it ;)

  • camaro is better

  • @fagout100 pendejo it never be better

  • Thanks for letting us listen to the engine sounds. Lots of other producers would have ruined it with a slightly out of date song playing over the whole video.

  • hmmm the old gt500 had a supercharger and it sounds like it has a supercharger.....so its obviously a turbo

  • @insidelineviideo Are you fucking deaf, can you not hear that supercharger whine!!

  • IT IS NOT TURBOCHARGED

  • any news about an IRS ??? 

  • @TheZ06Drifter no irs until the next gen in 2015... and thats not even for sure but they are putting the torsen diff in from the boss 302 so its gonna be one step farther improving the live axle

  • @darkeyes you are dumb

  • Its supercharged dummies

  • @hilde198881 ya your right i dont think this guy knows a thing about cars i could tell the difference between a turbo and a supercharger anyday

  • 2013 GT500 in Hot Rod Magazine

    ------------------------------­------------------------------­--------------------

    The March issue has a pretty good article on the '13 GT500, focusing on the engine most of all.

    Of particular note, with respect to a shot of the dyno computer screen: "The 650 HP rating is at the maximum continuous RPM of 6250, but the redline is 7000, at which point we saw 670+ HP on the screen. But Ford probably doesn't want you to know that."

    __________________

  • They already released info on this car.. its another modular V8 made 5.8 so ford can relive the old 302 and 351 windsor motors. 650hp hp supercharged a supposedly capable of 200mph. also its coming in at the same price as the old gt500.. so its faster than a corvette for $50k

  • its not turbo. the '13 is still a blower but they've upped the boost about 4 psi and bumped the displacement to a 5.8L.

  • but then again i did hear the whine so only way this thing is turbocharged is if its on some hellion type shit blower and turbo together but then the car would be a shit load more$ who knows

  • i hope its not turbo because i have a 98 turbo stroker stang and if they make any stang from the factory turbocharged turbo stangs will go from rare to every asshole maken the blowoff valve noise turbo stangs should come from hard work and a custom build.. thats great about the turbo is u dont have to waste power u can drive regular no boost low rpm no strain then when u need monster boost just take those rpm's up!! woooooooooooo

  • Long live the good old V8. Supercharge that bitch and rev the nuts off it!! Screw green peace!

  • Hmmm. It sounds like a 650 hp supercharged 5.8 v8..... But thats just a guess.... :)

  • I honestly would like to see this car Turbo'ed, but it isn't unless it's twin charged but that technology isn't really reliable to use, one cancels the other but my personal thought TT would just be better, as almost every vid of a Turbo stang vette or camaro on utube shows, ther're just like sling shots

  • and if I had it my way I'd rather spend the 500,000 grand or more that you would on a enzo and turn it into a 7 second street car and have money left over to buy a a couple daily drivers. But seeing how you are a fag who drives a impala and seems to like to come onto this site and argue with ppl I'll forgive you. I'm done with this pointless conversation

  • This is what ford should do:give the boss 302 engine, a better handling chassis and make it lose some weight.Or they should just bring back the ford gt.

  • Shit i don't see anything wrong with them if they was to turbo charge the new mustang. This sound is from a s/c tho and the new GT.500s are talking about having 650bhp instead of 550bhp. If ford was smart they would start installing the new ecoboost in the V6 stangs. Sombody said somthing about they wish ford would branch off from Shelby. That is a terrible idea it was shelby who has always helped ford with performance ideas and what not.

  • @67ShelbyMustang500 anymore shelby is just a badge, they are doing things shelby couldnt do anymore wit hall the new tech..

  • @darkeyce02 what you just said makes no sense. Kinda funny that ppl would pay 15 grand more for a shelby over a gt if shelby was just a badge. As far as I'm concerned all this new shit they put in cars can go away. What started the car craze back in the 50's was the fact that a person could buy a car and be able to upgrade it and work on it themselves. It was a sense of pride and enjoyment to do it. If your car breaks down you have to take it to a shop to get fixed

  • @67ShelbyMustang500 it makes plenty sense. carol shelby doesnt do much in actually building the car,he doesnt build the electronics telling the car what to do, a Shelby mustang is just another mustang with a different badge and few upgrades.. shelby only got famous cause he could race well with the car he modified,

  • @darkeyce02 wow then you don't know nothing about cars if you think the mustang gt and the shelby gt500 are the same. THe only thing the same is the body and interior. The engine is highly modified the suspion has been completly reworked over. Gears are different the whole car is different. Ford didn't come to shelby to have them put their name on their mustangs. Carol went to ford and said he wanted to build a mustang worthy of racing and put his name on it. Carol is the god of car world

  • @darkeyce02 and if your gonna talk crap about that then how about saleen? Oh yea jack roush also has a contract with ford are those the same cars with different badging? Come on man your are arguing with a guy who has owned 2 cobras, a gt, and v6 stang. A guy who works for ford full time and i would give both my nuts up to own a Super Snake. Shelby just ain't a badge man

  • @67ShelbyMustang500 that's sad, the mustang isn't that great compared to super cars. Carol isn't the God of cars. All he did was tell them what to put in the cars. He didn't design them or there chassis. Like the cobra. Facts are facts. Shelby didn't build the car, Ford did. Real people who actually built cars from the ground up like Enzo and Ferdinand Porsche. Now they deserve more respect, cant argue with that.

  • @67ShelbyMustang500 oh and they are only modified cars. Saleen and shelby mustangs both. Now if they totally designed the car like the S7 that's different.

  • @darkeyce02 hmmm i think you need to look up the shelby series 1 car then. Not a single person in the car world doesn't know who Carol Shelby is. So that in my eyes makes him the god of the car world. You can't compare a mustang to a super car you stupid ass. Ford doesn't make the mustang to compete against supercars. Ford's supercar was the Ford GT. Roush has the nascars behind it. Enzo builds cars that nobody can afford. Ford makes good cars for a great price and best bang for your buc

  • @67ShelbyMustang500 lol you can buy a much faster vette for the price of a top of the line stang. carol isnt as know as, mercedes or enzo, or porsche. not even lamborghini. the only reason i mentioned supercars cause you said you would give you small nuts for a super snake. if im gonna give up mine it would be for a car thats worth it, even a gumpert i would but for a common looking american car that is owned by mostly women i wouldnt, no matter whats under the hood.

  • @darkeyce02 ok dickweed you want to get into details thats fine I said the supersnake to keep with the theme mustang. If I could have any vehicle in the world it would be for a Saleen S7 Twin Turbo. You pointing out that only mustangs are owned by more women just goes to show how much you really hate the stang. Hate to break it to you man but I've seen just as many girls driving camaro's and imports as I have stangs. You can't buy a new vette for 42 grand dumbass.

  • Comment removed

  • @67ShelbyMustang500 Your information is terrible. Shelby has nothing to do with the GT500, except his name is on it. Ford designed the GT500, built the GT500, and have changed the GT500 on their own. The Series 1 was/is the ONLY vehicle Shelby designed and built himself. Everything else is built off of a preexisting chassis design.

    The last time Shelby went to Ford for anything was a motor for the AC Cobra, after Chevrolet turned him down.

  • I wish they would work on the Mustangs wieght dist more. Plus LOWER the damn price. I bet this car would cost 100,000 grand! I would rather have a Viper for that kind of money. I wish ford would part ways from Shelby and make there own higher performance mustang thats higher than the GT and the Boss. Maybe a street version of the Cobra Jet drag car mustang?? With 3:91 or 4:10 gears optional and with a N/A version of the 5.4 aluminum engine. Roll up windows and fiberglass front fenders and hood.

  • it's S/C, you can hear the wine.

  • why the hell would they turbo charge a mustang?

  • @momomortar To make it faster of course, i'm sure you seen vids on here of what Turbo Mustangs vette camaros can do, u can watch vids of SC stangs vetts when they go up against turbo cars an such an watch em get spanked, then you look up turbo stangs vettes an camaros an pick ya jaw up iff the floor when ya dun, usually an SC will almost certainly lose to a turbo car, besides they turbo'ed stangs in the 80's an they were faster than their v8 counter parts i wish they would turbo the stang

  • @magnificent10304 ya but mustangs are American Muscle cars that are meant for being supercharged. It's just not what Mustangs are meant for. It is cool though and i bet they're fast but Its's not what was the Mustang was meant for.

  • @momomortar Yes i def understand what u r saying but that mentality is of the old days, like when the car as a whole was assembled an produced in the same country due to globalization thats not even a factor anymore, more or less every car has a lil bit of somebody else in em, times change an so the rules gotta change too we can't always stay as ingorant to ignore what change is going on around us

  • @momomortar But remember they did turbo the 80's stang an it was a nice 4banger that was faster than the v8, the mustang svo it was also in Hotrod magazine 1000hp shoot out last year think it came in 2nd an the only car to beat it was practically a race car but it had over 1000hp and got 30mpg as gay as that is to bring to comparison, look up huber or stinger performance it's the only 4 banger i ever saw do wheelies an i mean wheelies for a long distance an still get in the 1/4 mile under 9 secs

  • American muscle has matured very nicely....it only gets even better from here on out.

  • why does it have a front sticker plate. in michigan they dont need them

  • @sportsfan6776 It's not in Michigan seems like the simplest answer.

  • @TheBulldawg4life yes but if you have a michigan car and drive through Illinois where you need one, it doesnt matter. maybe in Europe you have to have one no matter what

  • @sportsfan6776 German (maybe EU) law requires front and rear plates.

  • @TheBulldawg4life thats what i figured

  • @TheBulldawg4life This is a Boss on the dyno by Edmunds, tell me what does 416 rwhp = at the crank with an 11-13% driveline loss,

    watch?v=XonbZwYcIM0

    btw the short blocks used in the Boss Mustang are 302Rs

  • @1vdn992 Ah, I misunderstood. I thought you were saying 475 at the wheel. 416 would be 461 at 11% loss. Looking at the dyno sheet you can see the leveling off. Between 6200 and 7500 you only see a gain of 16 hp.

  • @TheBulldawg4life This might improve the power curve a little on the Boss Mustang,

    watch?v=LW1zRLjkOeY

  • @1vdn992 It should dramatically improve it. More fuel, more air flow, more power.

  • @TheBulldawg4life

    who gives a fuck about german laws

  • @moparcarsonly Germans and anyone interested in going to Germany come to mind..

  • @TheBulldawg4life don't like germany been there too many times over the years, narrow roads, wet and miserable

  • @moparcarsonly we r talking about the car not germany...

  • @29223gilbert

    i was talking about germany to someone else arsehole. mind your own fucking business.

  • @moparcarsonly im sorry did it fucking bother u jajaja... next time ill double check before i tell you something that hurts ur feelings faggot... jajajaja

  • @29223gilbert

    yes, don't you look left and right when you cross the road, not by the sound of it. grow up, baby face

  • @moparcarsonly baby face? jajajaja... alrite ill comment on this when i grow up...

  • 32 Valve DOHC - 16 Valve OHV. Not hard to get good flow with twice the valves.

  • @TheBulldawg4life Also, a modded Boss being dyno'd means nothing. Look at a STOCK Boss Dyno, it's leveling off at 7500.

  • That does not sound like a turbo, you can hear the supercharger whine @ :40

  • it must be super-turbo charged!

  • that's a 2011 or 2012 retard

  • If you close your eyes, you can hear the whine of the screw. It's supercharged. Inter coolers are used in many supercharged arrangements and while I just subscribed, since when has Ford ever put a turbo on a V8? Power delivery with a turbocharged V8 is not suitable for a production car Ford expects to sell in any great number as the power delivery is far too obnoxious.

    I remember about 2005, someone at Ford said they were going after BMW with the new Mustangs and everyone chuckled.

  • Did Ford release a lap time at nurburgring? Chevy did with the Camaro ZL1 - 7 minutes and 41 seconds.

  • 650+hp.need i say more

  • @halofan8100 yes! do tell about the suspension and the build quality aswell as the transmission

  • This car is a test mule

    If you want to read about it

    Road & Track

    2013 Ford Shelby GT500 - First Ride

    Yes it's a 2012 GT500 outside with 2013 under

    They just sold the 2013 durability test car for $300,000 at the Barret Jackson auction

  • @608gamer07 lmao naah just givin u a hard time lol

  • Thats a Twin Screw supercharger dumb ass.....

  • The New GT 500 has 4 exhaust tips not 2. That was a 2012...

  • @FTRlogan Test mule. They use older body styles as a mask but throw the new tech into it. This is how Ford always does test mules.

  • @608gamer07 really? so to test the 2005 they put the motor into the 2004? no.

  • Comment removed

  • @FTRlogan Now that I think about it yeah it's a test mule, but this IS the 2013 test mule. Car and driver reported this car as the 2013 test mule.

  • looks the same but i bet the price wont be

  • Supercharged or turbocharged, that is one mad sexy car.

  • and what a dumb question if its turbocharged or supercharged what american sportscar isnt charged seriosly?

  • how many different versions of the Mustangs they built in the last 5 years together with shelby and saleen i think about 20 and its stard to get boring always the same another V8 with another not naturaly aspirated engine with again shity brakes and suspension it just sounds and look good thats all this car isnt worth to wear an nordschleife badge FACT

  • thats not a 2013 gt500......

  • ^^^Why is this a video response to the corvette Z06..The Corvette will always kill the shelby

  • @805MustangKilla Judging by your username, I'm gonna go ahead and say that you're a biased douchebag who goes around watching videos about Mustangs just so that you can talk shit about them and feel better about yourself. Fuck you and whatever piece of shit you drive.

  • @SuperWhoopass I never said anything bad about the mustang.. im just saying why is this shelby trying to race a corvette when thats a mustang killa

  • @805MustangKilla o really is that why our 2012 boss 302 takes out the vette grand sport on the track?

  • @scub92 the grand sport is just a basic corvette...try the Z06

  • @scub92 I'm sorry, but you must be mistaken. The Grand Sport was 4 full seconds faster than the Boss 302 LS at VIR, .1 faster at Hockenheim, and only 1 second slower at the Streets of Willow? That's the Laguna Seca version, not the standard Boss 302.

  • @TheBulldawg4life Maybe so, but the Boss Mustang is $30,000 less, raise the rev limiter to 8000 and the Mustang has a shot as it'll be pushing 500 hp NA out of a 5.0L Ford.

    As for the ZL1, it's still DOA.

  • @1vdn992 The Boss 302 LS, the only one that'll stay close, costs $48k and the Grand Sport only $56k. I dare you to raise the limiter to 8000, you'll actually lose power unless you regear the hell out of it, and you'll end up grenading the engine. What "cheater" tires are you talking about? The Michelin Pilot Sport 2's that Porsche, Mercedes, BMW, and Ferrari use too? The ZL1 has already dominated the 302 LS, the GT500 won't put up much more of a fight.

  • @TheBulldawg4life Dyno testing shows the Boss continues to make more power beyond 7500 up until 7750 fuel cutoff, and nobody buys strippers, GS Vettes as tested were $70,000 in 2010 and Boss Mustangs break 4.0s to 60 GSs not. Base price is a fantasy figure. Motor Trend says Chevy offers and the ZO7 tested has cheater tires.

  • @1vdn992 I've seen the dyno sheets, and they're all leveling out. It's hard to get power out of a "big" V8 at 8k RPM. I know plenty of people who buy strippers, what do you think the Laguna Seca is? Motortrend can cry about whatever they want, GM isn't the first company to get top notch tires.

  • @TheBulldawg4life The stock Mustang GT heads flow more air than Chevys Nascar heads, and the Boss Mustang heads are ported and polished by hand. The Boss Mustang has more radical cam timing. OHC engines have reduced valve train inertia and that allows them to wind tighter. The same people who posted this video posted a Boss being dynoed and they got 475 at 7500 with fuel cutoff at 7750, and their graph showed an upward trend line to fuel cutoff, which means more than 475 bhp

  • @TheBulldawg4life are you stupid? the 2011 gt500 is faster than the cts-v at virginia international raceway. Shit, it was faster than audi R8 v10, and is in the same league as porsche gt3, viper srt-10, only the 2013 will be better. It's 300lb. lighter, has 90 more horsepower than the ZL1 (670hp hot rod magazine jan.2011 tested), and every mustang has handed the irs camaro's ass in it's class. GM can't bend the laws of physics, as much as Michael Bay lead you to believe.

  • @hugosuave1 You're naming off a lot of car's the ZL1 has already proven to be faster than..so what?

  • @hugosuave1 Also, have you ever studied physics? It's not my favorite, but I at least understand it.

  • @TheBulldawg4life who give a shit about german crap cars we are talking about mustangs because they look good and when you drive them they the wont break easy and wont need a $5000.00 part that you can get from china at $5.00

  • @MrDieselderrick You need a xanax. Someone asked a question, so bust off. Mustang GT trannies that kept failing before 2000 miles were from China.

  • @TheBulldawg4life Lethal Performance says they've been shifting their Boss Mustang at 8000,

    watch?v=0UeSmIafmVo

    watch?v=bRH55UtXfV0&feature=re­lated

    and the engine sees 9000 on a missed shift

  • Comment removed

  • I am more interested in the 2014 mustang... I am getting one.. just not sure what engine yet!

  • @Lodoz I know it will have IRS. But what will the 2014 stang look like?

  • Why would he say that it could possibly be turbocharged when you can hear the supercharger whine in the video?

  • @kylemerrick315 rhetorical question/slightly sarcastic

  • wow...there are alot of stupid comments on here

  • I love it when people say spy footage. The camera person just "coincidentally/magically" happened to be there at the exact same time to get the footage.

  • I will not have any respect for this car until it gets rid of is solid rear axle.. That is why the old Cobra R will always reign supreme, with its MASSIVE Naturally aspirated power finding it's way to the road through FULLY independent suspension..

  • @bliglum By MASSIVE naturally aspirated power do you mean 27 hp less then a 2011 bone stock GT? I would take MASSIVE boosted horespower (650 vs 385) anyday and with the MASSIVE boosted power you would walk the FULLY independent suspension car !! This car doesnt respect you either so it's all good !

  • @steeda28 Shut up you ignorant little bitch you're missing the point..

  • @bliglum What that your an idiot? The point is that this car would beat the 00R with or with out the independant rear ! Bitch

  • @bliglum no respect? the regular GT mustang .... it beat a M3 on the track. with a live axle.

    the Boss 302 LS can run lap times on Leguna seca that rival the Porsche 911 GT2 and nissan GTR.

    hell, aparently the Boss 302 LS mustang can run neck and neck with a ZL1 camaro... anf that car fucking beat Ferrari F430's and a Pagani Zonda S...and allot more high end super cars (like an R8, SLS, Gallardo etc...) On the Nurburgring!

    so i think it deserves a little respect.

  • @CemetaryGatesML Yeah, on a perfectly flat, glassy smooth track it's not as much of a liability.. In the real world on the other hand... I'll stick with fully independent suspension over that wallowy live rear axle cheap shit.

  • @bliglum thats your opinion, id rather have the live axle, its cheaper, easyer to mod incase i deside to go Posi. more reliable and easyer to work on. ]

    i dont need IRS for street use, tho...even with the Live axle...the mustang is setting some serious lap times

  • @CemetaryGatesML I can see where you would like the live axle over the IRS, especially when it's easyer (easier) to work on. If you do deside (decide) to work on it, I hope it comes with phonetic instructions or you'll be lost. I'll wait for you to look up phonetic..........

  • @ghost5899 lol