Interview Mike Zovath at creation museum PT 1

[jerico641]

Scientists do not ASSUME anything; they learn about the natural world through investigation, experimentation and corroboration.

[ClamCrunchy]

@Japeth555 There's footage of Zovath saying that he doesn't believe in global warming.

[jknengr796]

Mike Zovath: What a fucking retard!

[ClamCrunchy]

Zovath is also a global warming denier. What a tool.

[TheWhiskeyHotel]

@ClamCrunchy i did not know that.  thanks for the info!

[Japeth555]

Answers in genesis does not deny global warming

[Mnelsen85]

mike zovath should be slapped around with a science book, creationism isnt good science, its a cover up for adding religion into science. The earth is billions of years old, dinosaurs never lived with humans, and the first death didnt come from mans denial of god. This is why we are laughed at around the world. Science is starting to rip the bible apart and religion is trying to piece it back together.

[aquatania]

(and the moral is) You can lead a Creationist to knowledge but you can't make him think.

[bleebleblubble]

You come off as too cynical/sarcastic/confrontatio­nal in this video. Were you trying to make this guy look bad?

[r1ddleb0x]

I'm sorry? Why do you view that? I was simply asking him questions about creationism and his view of evolution. I might have come across as confrontational because a typical creationist tactic is to answer questions on behalf of evolution. I didn't want him to do this, I simply wanted him to speak on creationism, his topic. I told him beforehand to leave evolution to the evolutionists, I just want to hear HIS view. Yet he strayed occasionally, and I had to bring him back.

[bleebleblubble]

Test...

[bleebleblubble]

Damn it! I typed up a nice long response and it didn't post it. Damned YT.

Okay so what I was saying is that you're obviously a nice guy, your response to me tells me that. I just read your tone and demeanor in this, not to mention your other videos. I'm just wondering, how can you expect to win people over to your side if you ridicule them for having "stupid" beliefs? Many factors make people what they are and believe what they believe, we can't afford to be so judgmental.

[r1ddleb0x]

I use to be nice about it. When I do that, I get talked over, and instead ridiculed about atheism. I'm done being nice.

Plus, it's a matter of them rejecting reality.  Them being willfully ignorant. That just already puts me off to their position to start with.

[bleebleblubble]

Sorry for all these posts, I just want to add, I'm not attacking you. I think you're very smart, it's just that (speaking generally about your videos - not necessarily this one) there's a better way to *help* people see your side. Of course it will take some patience... lol

[DireManti]

He Mentions Irreductible complexity as proof of the falsehood of evolution, However Irreductible complexity was debunked in the 70's and 80's by numerous scientists, look up the blind watchmaker for an explanation of how Irredutible complexity is false

[RickRolledIRL]

Heh, in all honesty, you're preaching to the choir here

[DireManti]

True that

[ChristianLinnell]

I couldn't actually finish it. I've seen too much of this stuff and I literally can't handle any more!

[Parmenus]

It would be interesting to see the staffers of this museum in an actual debate on the subject.

[nvcn86]

no, it would not. they must not be given a chance to "debate" less they see themselves as equal to science. there can be no debate, which is based on evidence, when one of the sides depends on beliefs, not evidence.

[Parmenus]

My idea is to dress up in a clown suit when debating them. Thus depriving them of any possible respect gained through association. :-)