I love how all you people are taking what he said out of context. this is why no one respects the far left.. you cant have an actual debate with them because they only hear what they want to hear. McCain's reference wasnt to denying womens health, but to legal lingo that allow for loopholes in the medical service field. And by the way.. im pro-choice. CONTEXT PEOPLE.. EDUCATE YOURSELF ON IT.
There is nothing more important to a christian than life, especially the life of innocents. Our first obligation is to love each other as we love God.
yep, let's see christains killing women in the name of god, the native peoples, yep forcing children to not speak their natiev tongue, killing people that dont agree, bombing houses, yep, allota love their
The Supreme court also allowed slavery. And that too was the law of the land. Was the Supreme Court right in allowing slavery to continue simply because it was the law? Nope! It was wrong everyday it was practiced as law.
Got to love the lib heads... "It's sounds cruel!" Hey! Try being on the other end of a late term abortion! Cruel doesn't begin to describe it you sad soul!
Ahhh Sean Hannity's EVIL twin brother Racheal MAD-ow. S'he should shove a stainless steel implement into the base of s'his viable -outside the womb- skull...and late term s'himself.
Wow this is the most impartial coverage i've ever seen. so balanced. both sides where represented fairly and ethically. I can't figure out why the American public are turning to independent Internet media for their news
you've missed the point. journalism is supposed to be unbiased. if it is not, then it is a special interest organ like Iskra and Provda in the USSR. it can still be technically called news, but we know it is nothing more than a propaganda device for the special interest group. i'm not supporting Fox news either as it suffers from the same defects. we shouldn't have to watch two separate channels to get reasonable, and fair, representation of the issues.
Oh, shouldn't this and shouldn't that. Stop being so indignant.
We are greedy and cruel by nature, and people like Rupert Murdoch are always going to mess up your "no bias" idealism no matter what. Besides, it's just human nature to be partially biased to some extent.
Yes, the world sucks. Yes you should have all the news. But it ain't gonna happen. Remember when Bush was stovepiping information to the NY Times? Everyone believed that info. You will never get the whole story.
I agree we will never get the whole story, Because of views like yours. the press is to challenge and question the authorities, whether Political, religious or economic. but instead we get this from the main stream media. And it is possible to give fair coverage. i do it all the time. in fact i present views i detest as strongly as i can so i might understand them better. I'm Canadian, watch CBC News & see what i'm talking about. It's far more balanced than US. We never see diatribes like this.
these morons hate anyone who is against abortion , they have no problem with a baby's brain being sucked out , or a baby being aborted up to 9 months , they mask there stupidity under the phrase womens health but lets call it what it is murder and by the way the majority of doctors in this country are against abortion jezz i wonder why
Doctors take an oath to "first do no harm". Aborting a healthy fetus for no medical reason runs counter to this oath and puts physicians in a moral and professional dilemna.
I hate women and I beleive in abortion. Why in the hell would I want a worthless cunt's kids taking up my space, food, and money? Abortion will weed a lot of these cruel whores out of existence. Besides that, I have my cake and eat it too, if the cunt gets pregnant, she can just get an abortion and I don't have to pay child support.
Science has proven that life begins at conception. The AMA (American Medical Association) made that statement, too. An unborn baby has a heartbeat, dreams, sucks his/her thumb, responds to environmental stimuli, has a separate blood flow from the mother. It never existed? You are so misled. You think once a "nonexistent' baby travels through the birth canal it's.....POOF.....a life? Like a magician pulling a rabbit out of a hat? It was a life before, too. (the rabbit was there before, too)
... there's a big stretch between life beginning at conception and life beginning in the womb.
Do you really think that science has proven a zygote has dreams? It's just a bunch of cells. Think about it properly before you write about it. I agree with most of what you're saying, but you've got the story mixed up. There's a difference between a zygote, an embryo and a foetus.
Theres a big difference between a newborn, an elementary school student and a senior citizen Yeah, no shit. Their age is obviously the difference. The similarity is that they all have consciousness and a brain.
My argument was not weak and unfounded you fucking tool. I was pretty much agreeing with you. You just got your facts wrong and I was correcting you. Science has not proven that life begins at conception, only that a foetus has consciousness.
. Obviously you dont know the first thing about biology, so Ill fill you in. A zygote is just a tiny cluster of undifferentiated cells and cannot dream because it is not an organism and it certainly doesnt have a brain. An embryo is, for the most part, just a clump of differentiated tissues, and does not dream because it doesnt have a developed brain and science doesnt even know if they have consciousness or not, but the cerebral cortex is not developed until it is a foetus.
FOETUSES do dream, because their brains are developed and they have consciousness so, clearly, there is a RELEVANT difference between a foetus and an embryo and zygote. Using a newborn, a kid and an old person as a comparison was irrelevant and just made you look like a smartarse.
There has been absolutely no proof that life begins at conception. You are an ignorant arse and obviously dont understand what youre talking about, let alone what I was saying in my comment.
I'm so sick of the abortion argument. It's a no win argument. Yes women need to have the freedom to decide what happens to their bodies. Having a baby can change a woman's body forever. Yes the fathers of the babies should have equal say in what happens to the baby but that contradicts the woman's right over her own body. Yes foetuses of a certain age are just small babies with consciousness and deserve life, but that contradicts both the rights of the mother and father. Somebody always loses.
What i don't understand is why the republican party was against the move to have the "morning after" pill available over the counter. The morning after pill takes care of the problem either before firtilisation even occurs or when the "baby" is only a small bunch of cells clustered together (and not a baby).
I just wish people would take contraception more seriously. I know too many women my age (20) who have gotten pregnant because they "decided to risk it just that once". It's so stupid.
because they have some stone age notion that abstinence is the best policy due to their christian values. when it turns out that abstinence programs make for more unwanted pregnancies than contraception.
Desires are natural. Yes, we may, and often do, choose to act on them. I would never tell someone sex is unnatural. By definition, it is natural. As far as being sinful, that is something you and your partner must decide for yourselves. You will only suffer guilt if you believe it to be wrong in spite of what I might or might not say. However, there are always consequences, especially when you involve multiple partners.
Abortion is wrong,selfish,and irresponsible for the most part.If a women has unprotected sex,she should be women enough to take the potential consequences.
Abortion may be wrong, but then a wrong weighed against others in the decision. Just because you may be right doesn't mean there aren't greater sociological reasons for implementing birth control resources worldwide. Preaching abstinence will not solve aids and overpopulation. Making abortion illegal also will not stop it and will make it more dangerous. I think its time we stopped being pro-life or pro-choice and start looking at the real issues facing us while observing any lost humanity.
Im so glad Obama won Im not even American but Canada does seem to follow very close to the US
Its amazing that in this day and age so many people believe women to be little more then incubaters I dont understand how they can hold their daughters and say they love her but want to take her reproductive rights away from her! Or even their sons to have to possibly watch their lover in serious pain or die from an illegal abortion
McCain is so completely out of touch with women's health issues.
His ideology is so 1950's! If this guy wins, wire hangers are gonna be the hottest thing on Wall Street!
Don't these people get it??! Without the availability of REAL doctors who can perform abortions in a clean, medical environments women WILL seek to terminate in a dangerous, life threatening way.
Come to think of it, there are women who just shouldn't be pregnant. And they know it.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
What a cunt. She's the snide one, she just doesn't like anything Palin or McCain have to say simply because they don't agree with Maddow's views. Maddow thinks her positions are absolute truth. Pathetic.
both sides of the ideological spectrum tend to think they have the monopoly on truth. have you heard how the far right talks about the left? it's pretty disturbing, and rabidly anti-intellectual. both sides have their fair share of idiots.
the truth is prolife people really dont care about women except as a function of reproduction, who cares if a woman dies? even if she dies and the child dies, there are more. they want women to die, simple as that, of course the man that gets her pregnant doesnt care, or he would get snipped before sex,lol
prolifers care about women. Half of the aborted babies are female. Many prolife people want to protect the children. Unfortunately, only women can get pregnant.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Yes. We all know that the "health" of a woman can be stretched to mean so many things. Like, maybe she has the flu. Then she has to have an abortion, right?
PeWh55: The "health" of the mother refers 2 things like cancer, pre-eclampsia, placenta previa, extreme hemorraging, pulmonary embolism, extreme vital organ (heart/lung/kidneys) problems, victims of violence (kicked in the stomach/shot & losing blood), etc. Most mothers who get beyond the first tri-mester don't want an abortion; they want 2 carry 2 term (or at least 2 the point the baby's mortality rate is better. I am pro-choice but hate when women use abortion as birth control.
Good luck trying to have a discussion with a xenophobic simpleton.
As for me, I'll be down at my friendly neighbourhood Planned Parenthood clinic - today is "Free Ice Cream Cone With Every Abortion Day." With my sweet tooth, I may just have two...
im pro choice as well but something you wrote here dosnt make sence to me ill quote the two parts "but abortion should of course only be used in emergencies" & "should not be denied the right to have one if they feel they must"
so what exactly means an emergency would this only mean when it comes to her physical health now or mental health later?
Emergency=Last resort (failed birthcontrol, rape, incest (which is usually rape), danger of carrying to term for mother etc.).
"Feel they must"=Have seriously considered all other options: Having the baby, having it & giving it up for adoption. Also includes social circumstances, like lack of means.
If a woman, after careful consideration, still wants to have an abortion I don't want her to have to do it in a way that endangers her (i.e. illegally), but have it done safely & legally.
thank u had an abortion myself & it would more then likely not of endangoured me physically (mind u both births i had, had complications for the child & my plicenta)
but @ the time & still true i would not be able to give 3 children adaquate care even during pregnancy(time, hugs kisses) but also financally & i want to make sure the two boys i have now will be able to live a life without going without food, shelter, clothing, love & time. probably would of lost it anyways gotta love cone biopies
PeWh55: I got UR sarcasm (goldgrif didn't), but many YT commenters would not (& no I didn't rate U hands down). I was using U 4 future commenters who I R unable 2 distiguish sarcasm. I apologize 4 using U.
Hey, what the problem, the function of women is simply to reproduce, to bear children for men. If a few die to that end, who cares, they really dont have a need for life, they can be replaced. Disgusting, isnt it. Any women that is intelliegent that votes for McCain and Palin shows that she really doesnt value even her own life, or the fact that she is chattel, as are the children.
Except NONE of us would even know we were ever aborted if such was the case, why? BECAUSE FETUSES HAVE NO THOUGHTS OR FEELINGS WHATSOEVER! Unlike full-grown women, who DO feel things like trauma, depression, and pain, both emotional AND PHYSICAL, and guess what? A forced abortion on a rape victim triggers ALL of these feelings. So who suffers worse in this case? The unborn fetus who has no consciousness whatsoever, or the mother being raped and forced to go through an unwanted pregnancy?
So when does a child become a child? At birth? What about preemies? Or when there's a heartbeat? Separate blood flow? Brain activity? There are doctors who concur that life begins at conception. acknowledging that fact would force us to re-evaluate our beliefs on sex, marriage and womanhood and a lot of people just don't want to do that. Aren't you glad your mom didn't choose to abort you?
If a fetus is a human being, deserving of human rights... Why when a woman miscarries do we not have funerals?
Because that would be STUPID!
Before it leaves the mother's body, its that mothers choice what to do with HER body. Period. When the fetus is at a point where it could live outside her body, then it should be illegal to terminate it, because that would be murder, as it is its own being not reliant on the mother's body.
If someone needs to do that for comfort, fine. They are mourning the life that almost happened. Most people don't do that. If someone feels the need to do that... Fine, I would imagine, they need all the comfort and support they could find... But you don't read obituaries about miscarried babies, because they never existed.
But then why in some states is it considered double homicide to murder a pregnant woman, no matter what stage of pregnancy she's in? That's an issue that's always confused me.
Abortions are not killing babies, 80% of aborions are carried out under 10 weeks of the pregnanacy the majority being within days of fertilization. The 20% over 10 weeks are almost always due to medical reasons under advice of the doctor.
Maybe the abortion lobby should turn their christian thoughts elsewhere, like the Military industrial complex that keeps creating ever more ingenius weapons to take human life.
You mean "her" children? Many women love their children and value them as people. They don't see it as reproducing "the" children "for men". Your view seems somewhat jaded.
FUCK John McCain!
Brit050792 10 months ago
I love how all you people are taking what he said out of context. this is why no one respects the far left.. you cant have an actual debate with them because they only hear what they want to hear. McCain's reference wasnt to denying womens health, but to legal lingo that allow for loopholes in the medical service field. And by the way.. im pro-choice. CONTEXT PEOPLE.. EDUCATE YOURSELF ON IT.
187Unseen 1 year ago
~•"Since a MAN can't make a BABY, he has no right to tell a WOMAN when or where to create one"•~ Tupac
NIKKEIsix 1 year ago 2
There is nothing more important to a christian than life, especially the life of innocents. Our first obligation is to love each other as we love God.
Mikevdog 2 years ago
yep, let's see christains killing women in the name of god, the native peoples, yep forcing children to not speak their natiev tongue, killing people that dont agree, bombing houses, yep, allota love their
goldgrif 2 years ago
I point out our oblgation to love each other, but I am fully aware that many people fall short and fail to do this.
Mikevdog 2 years ago
Lesbians for Republicans!
Mikevdog 2 years ago
Yay! Obama won presidency! Healthcare is actually an issue, where it's obvious that women's "healthcare" is not a concern to McCain
Potatopetes 2 years ago
lol.
IronEagle1225 2 years ago
The Supreme court also allowed slavery. And that too was the law of the land. Was the Supreme Court right in allowing slavery to continue simply because it was the law? Nope! It was wrong everyday it was practiced as law.
Got to love the lib heads... "It's sounds cruel!" Hey! Try being on the other end of a late term abortion! Cruel doesn't begin to describe it you sad soul!
radioactivenews 2 years ago
did you just compare Abortion to Slavery? Wow something is seriously wrong with you.
Facebook289 2 years ago
Ahhh Sean Hannity's EVIL twin brother Racheal MAD-ow. S'he should shove a stainless steel implement into the base of s'his viable -outside the womb- skull...and late term s'himself.
salinagrrrl69 2 years ago
Wow, can you say quote mining? Typical media bull shit tactics.
tube2a 2 years ago
I believe all that could be said about McCain's argument was best said at 00:43-00:44.
xlanciferionx 2 years ago
Pat Buchanan is a total and complete asshole.
GDogSamurai 2 years ago
Wow this is the most impartial coverage i've ever seen. so balanced. both sides where represented fairly and ethically. I can't figure out why the American public are turning to independent Internet media for their news
kdurston1 2 years ago
want a balance? watch both MSNBC and Fox News.
purplefuzzythings 2 years ago 2
you've missed the point. journalism is supposed to be unbiased. if it is not, then it is a special interest organ like Iskra and Provda in the USSR. it can still be technically called news, but we know it is nothing more than a propaganda device for the special interest group. i'm not supporting Fox news either as it suffers from the same defects. we shouldn't have to watch two separate channels to get reasonable, and fair, representation of the issues.
kdurston1 2 years ago
Oh, shouldn't this and shouldn't that. Stop being so indignant.
We are greedy and cruel by nature, and people like Rupert Murdoch are always going to mess up your "no bias" idealism no matter what. Besides, it's just human nature to be partially biased to some extent.
Yes, the world sucks. Yes you should have all the news. But it ain't gonna happen. Remember when Bush was stovepiping information to the NY Times? Everyone believed that info. You will never get the whole story.
purplefuzzythings 2 years ago
I agree we will never get the whole story, Because of views like yours. the press is to challenge and question the authorities, whether Political, religious or economic. but instead we get this from the main stream media. And it is possible to give fair coverage. i do it all the time. in fact i present views i detest as strongly as i can so i might understand them better. I'm Canadian, watch CBC News & see what i'm talking about. It's far more balanced than US. We never see diatribes like this.
kdurston1 2 years ago
They both are owned by the same people to keep us distracted.
satinbarbi 2 years ago
these morons hate anyone who is against abortion , they have no problem with a baby's brain being sucked out , or a baby being aborted up to 9 months , they mask there stupidity under the phrase womens health but lets call it what it is murder and by the way the majority of doctors in this country are against abortion jezz i wonder why
cocobear33 2 years ago
Doctors take an oath to "first do no harm". Aborting a healthy fetus for no medical reason runs counter to this oath and puts physicians in a moral and professional dilemna.
Mikevdog 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I hate women and I beleive in abortion. Why in the hell would I want a worthless cunt's kids taking up my space, food, and money? Abortion will weed a lot of these cruel whores out of existence. Besides that, I have my cake and eat it too, if the cunt gets pregnant, she can just get an abortion and I don't have to pay child support.
Markohoppis 2 years ago
Science has proven that life begins at conception. The AMA (American Medical Association) made that statement, too. An unborn baby has a heartbeat, dreams, sucks his/her thumb, responds to environmental stimuli, has a separate blood flow from the mother. It never existed? You are so misled. You think once a "nonexistent' baby travels through the birth canal it's.....POOF.....a life? Like a magician pulling a rabbit out of a hat? It was a life before, too. (the rabbit was there before, too)
westman67 3 years ago
... there's a big stretch between life beginning at conception and life beginning in the womb.
Do you really think that science has proven a zygote has dreams? It's just a bunch of cells. Think about it properly before you write about it. I agree with most of what you're saying, but you've got the story mixed up. There's a difference between a zygote, an embryo and a foetus.
ffliz217 3 years ago
Theres a big difference between a newborn, an elementary school student and a senior citizen Yeah, no shit. Their age is obviously the difference. The similarity is that they all have consciousness and a brain.
My argument was not weak and unfounded you fucking tool. I was pretty much agreeing with you. You just got your facts wrong and I was correcting you. Science has not proven that life begins at conception, only that a foetus has consciousness.
ffliz217 3 years ago
. Obviously you dont know the first thing about biology, so Ill fill you in. A zygote is just a tiny cluster of undifferentiated cells and cannot dream because it is not an organism and it certainly doesnt have a brain. An embryo is, for the most part, just a clump of differentiated tissues, and does not dream because it doesnt have a developed brain and science doesnt even know if they have consciousness or not, but the cerebral cortex is not developed until it is a foetus.
ffliz217 3 years ago
FOETUSES do dream, because their brains are developed and they have consciousness so, clearly, there is a RELEVANT difference between a foetus and an embryo and zygote. Using a newborn, a kid and an old person as a comparison was irrelevant and just made you look like a smartarse.
There has been absolutely no proof that life begins at conception. You are an ignorant arse and obviously dont understand what youre talking about, let alone what I was saying in my comment.
ffliz217 3 years ago
You can have your own opinion, but you cant have your own facts, so dont go making shit up to support your moral standing.
Poor thing? You should try actually reading and comprehending what people say before you turn into an arrogant prick and make at fool out of yourself.
And i make no appologies for how rude this is. If you want to be a condescending wanker then you're going to have to deal with the consequences.
Get my point now moron? Keep your crap off my profile page.
ffliz217 3 years ago
Sarah Palin hates women when she is one? stupid idiot, talk about self hatred!!!!!!!!!!
John McCain is a faggot
SexyPinkLipstick 3 years ago
I'm so sick of the abortion argument. It's a no win argument. Yes women need to have the freedom to decide what happens to their bodies. Having a baby can change a woman's body forever. Yes the fathers of the babies should have equal say in what happens to the baby but that contradicts the woman's right over her own body. Yes foetuses of a certain age are just small babies with consciousness and deserve life, but that contradicts both the rights of the mother and father. Somebody always loses.
ffliz217 3 years ago
What i don't understand is why the republican party was against the move to have the "morning after" pill available over the counter. The morning after pill takes care of the problem either before firtilisation even occurs or when the "baby" is only a small bunch of cells clustered together (and not a baby).
I just wish people would take contraception more seriously. I know too many women my age (20) who have gotten pregnant because they "decided to risk it just that once". It's so stupid.
ffliz217 3 years ago
because they have some stone age notion that abstinence is the best policy due to their christian values. when it turns out that abstinence programs make for more unwanted pregnancies than contraception.
its all about control
burningeko 3 years ago
Abstinence is the best way not to get pregnant. Contraception is no guarantee.
Mikevdog 2 years ago
i agree that abstinence is the best way to not get pregnant.
unfortunately abstinence programs don't work, all they do is cause guilt and confusion to people who have natural desires.
sex is the most fun and satisfying things that you can do with another human being (or 2 if you are lucky).
trying to make people think that something they do naturally is unnatural and sinful you are causing people to suffer.
teaching people to do things responsibly is the way to go.contraception=less stds etc
burningeko 2 years ago
Desires are natural. Yes, we may, and often do, choose to act on them. I would never tell someone sex is unnatural. By definition, it is natural. As far as being sinful, that is something you and your partner must decide for yourselves. You will only suffer guilt if you believe it to be wrong in spite of what I might or might not say. However, there are always consequences, especially when you involve multiple partners.
Mikevdog 2 years ago
Comment removed
bluago 3 years ago
There are waiting lists for adopting babies--white babies anyway.
Mikevdog 2 years ago
It's "health" because people are going to say that "I am sad, therefore it is affecting my health. I want an abortion."
matthewgsteel 3 years ago
Abortion is wrong,selfish,and irresponsible for the most part.If a women has unprotected sex,she should be women enough to take the potential consequences.
pricelesspam 3 years ago
Abortion may be wrong, but then a wrong weighed against others in the decision. Just because you may be right doesn't mean there aren't greater sociological reasons for implementing birth control resources worldwide. Preaching abstinence will not solve aids and overpopulation. Making abortion illegal also will not stop it and will make it more dangerous. I think its time we stopped being pro-life or pro-choice and start looking at the real issues facing us while observing any lost humanity.
Rcbquark 3 years ago 2
i have a lesbian teacher who scares the crap out of me
ironmantriathalon 3 years ago
What does that have anything to do with anything?
rosesarepurple22 3 years ago
Im so glad Obama won Im not even American but Canada does seem to follow very close to the US
Its amazing that in this day and age so many people believe women to be little more then incubaters I dont understand how they can hold their daughters and say they love her but want to take her reproductive rights away from her! Or even their sons to have to possibly watch their lover in serious pain or die from an illegal abortion
itsjessica1984 3 years ago 11
It's not all about women's reproductive choices. It's also about protecting the child's rights. There are always at least 3 people involved.
Legal and illegal abortions both result in the loss of the child.
Mikevdog 2 years ago
"The Health" of women? What a fucktard!
McCain is so completely out of touch with women's health issues.
His ideology is so 1950's! If this guy wins, wire hangers are gonna be the hottest thing on Wall Street!
Don't these people get it??! Without the availability of REAL doctors who can perform abortions in a clean, medical environments women WILL seek to terminate in a dangerous, life threatening way.
Come to think of it, there are women who just shouldn't be pregnant. And they know it.
RuffNReddyRed 3 years ago 5
Palin hates women..
Obama is not pro-abortion, he wants to stop the number of unwanted pregnancies..
Palin can kiss my butt.
ANDREBYNUM 3 years ago
Palin is pro life. And Mathews should be talking about problems surrounding Obama.
skydogz1 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
What a cunt. She's the snide one, she just doesn't like anything Palin or McCain have to say simply because they don't agree with Maddow's views. Maddow thinks her positions are absolute truth. Pathetic.
Shuzafa 3 years ago
both sides of the ideological spectrum tend to think they have the monopoly on truth. have you heard how the far right talks about the left? it's pretty disturbing, and rabidly anti-intellectual. both sides have their fair share of idiots.
atvfreelife 3 years ago 2
the truth is prolife people really dont care about women except as a function of reproduction, who cares if a woman dies? even if she dies and the child dies, there are more. they want women to die, simple as that, of course the man that gets her pregnant doesnt care, or he would get snipped before sex,lol
goldgrif 3 years ago 4
prolifers care about women. Half of the aborted babies are female. Many prolife people want to protect the children. Unfortunately, only women can get pregnant.
Mikevdog 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Yes. We all know that the "health" of a woman can be stretched to mean so many things. Like, maybe she has the flu. Then she has to have an abortion, right?
PeWh55 3 years ago
what an idiot, but it is not YOU supporting the child. i mean if you bomb kids to bits then how can you be prolife,
goldgrif 3 years ago 5
PeWh55: The "health" of the mother refers 2 things like cancer, pre-eclampsia, placenta previa, extreme hemorraging, pulmonary embolism, extreme vital organ (heart/lung/kidneys) problems, victims of violence (kicked in the stomach/shot & losing blood), etc. Most mothers who get beyond the first tri-mester don't want an abortion; they want 2 carry 2 term (or at least 2 the point the baby's mortality rate is better. I am pro-choice but hate when women use abortion as birth control.
sleonardelli 3 years ago 2
Good luck trying to have a discussion with a xenophobic simpleton.
As for me, I'll be down at my friendly neighbourhood Planned Parenthood clinic - today is "Free Ice Cream Cone With Every Abortion Day." With my sweet tooth, I may just have two...
GoreyFantod 3 years ago
Seems you didn't get that I was being sarcastic (and, yes, I know that's usually lost on Americans).
I was mocking McCain's dismissive, condescending, mean and STUPID comment towards women and I couldn't agree with you more.
I am absolutely pro-choice but abortion should of course only be used in emergencies.
No woman WANTS an abortion. Its a last resort. But they should not be denied the right to have one if they feel they must.
PeWh55 3 years ago
im pro choice as well but something you wrote here dosnt make sence to me ill quote the two parts "but abortion should of course only be used in emergencies" & "should not be denied the right to have one if they feel they must"
so what exactly means an emergency would this only mean when it comes to her physical health now or mental health later?
itsjessica1984 3 years ago
Emergency=Last resort (failed birthcontrol, rape, incest (which is usually rape), danger of carrying to term for mother etc.).
"Feel they must"=Have seriously considered all other options: Having the baby, having it & giving it up for adoption. Also includes social circumstances, like lack of means.
If a woman, after careful consideration, still wants to have an abortion I don't want her to have to do it in a way that endangers her (i.e. illegally), but have it done safely & legally.
PeWh55 3 years ago
thank u had an abortion myself & it would more then likely not of endangoured me physically (mind u both births i had, had complications for the child & my plicenta)
but @ the time & still true i would not be able to give 3 children adaquate care even during pregnancy(time, hugs kisses) but also financally & i want to make sure the two boys i have now will be able to live a life without going without food, shelter, clothing, love & time. probably would of lost it anyways gotta love cone biopies
itsjessica1984 3 years ago
PeWh55: I got UR sarcasm (goldgrif didn't), but many YT commenters would not (& no I didn't rate U hands down). I was using U 4 future commenters who I R unable 2 distiguish sarcasm. I apologize 4 using U.
sleonardelli 3 years ago
Hey, what the problem, the function of women is simply to reproduce, to bear children for men. If a few die to that end, who cares, they really dont have a need for life, they can be replaced. Disgusting, isnt it. Any women that is intelliegent that votes for McCain and Palin shows that she really doesnt value even her own life, or the fact that she is chattel, as are the children.
goldgrif 3 years ago 8
i guess pro-life people don't care! lol.
johnher1982 3 years ago 4
This comment has received too many negative votes show
This is not true.A unborn child should have rights too.We where all once unborn children.
pricelesspam 3 years ago
Except NONE of us would even know we were ever aborted if such was the case, why? BECAUSE FETUSES HAVE NO THOUGHTS OR FEELINGS WHATSOEVER! Unlike full-grown women, who DO feel things like trauma, depression, and pain, both emotional AND PHYSICAL, and guess what? A forced abortion on a rape victim triggers ALL of these feelings. So who suffers worse in this case? The unborn fetus who has no consciousness whatsoever, or the mother being raped and forced to go through an unwanted pregnancy?
Headhunter004 3 years ago 2
no a fetus should not have rights. it is a fetus it is not conscious.
trippendale742 3 years ago
So when does a child become a child? At birth? What about preemies? Or when there's a heartbeat? Separate blood flow? Brain activity? There are doctors who concur that life begins at conception. acknowledging that fact would force us to re-evaluate our beliefs on sex, marriage and womanhood and a lot of people just don't want to do that. Aren't you glad your mom didn't choose to abort you?
westman67 3 years ago
i changed my views now. and why did you reply to a 2 month old comment?
trippendale742 3 years ago
If a fetus is a human being, deserving of human rights... Why when a woman miscarries do we not have funerals?
Because that would be STUPID!
Before it leaves the mother's body, its that mothers choice what to do with HER body. Period. When the fetus is at a point where it could live outside her body, then it should be illegal to terminate it, because that would be murder, as it is its own being not reliant on the mother's body.
Boobalopbop 3 years ago
Funerals are available for miscarried babies.
westman67 3 years ago
If someone needs to do that for comfort, fine. They are mourning the life that almost happened. Most people don't do that. If someone feels the need to do that... Fine, I would imagine, they need all the comfort and support they could find... But you don't read obituaries about miscarried babies, because they never existed.
Boobalopbop 3 years ago
But then why in some states is it considered double homicide to murder a pregnant woman, no matter what stage of pregnancy she's in? That's an issue that's always confused me.
sparklygoldfish 3 years ago
that shouldnt be the law. Thats unconstitutional and should be repealed
Facebook289 2 years ago
Why not just say the baby should be old enough to feed itself? Or walk? Or vote?
Mikevdog 2 years ago
Abortions are not killing babies, 80% of aborions are carried out under 10 weeks of the pregnanacy the majority being within days of fertilization. The 20% over 10 weeks are almost always due to medical reasons under advice of the doctor.
Maybe the abortion lobby should turn their christian thoughts elsewhere, like the Military industrial complex that keeps creating ever more ingenius weapons to take human life.
xdir 3 years ago 2
When does life begin? it's not logical that it begins at some ambiguous time between conception at birth.
westman67 3 years ago
Personally I would say at the foetus stage, at 2 months into the pregnancy.
xdir 3 years ago
Even a few cells are "life" so technically, at conception.
Mikevdog 2 years ago
You mean "her" children? Many women love their children and value them as people. They don't see it as reproducing "the" children "for men". Your view seems somewhat jaded.
Mikevdog 2 years ago