US Constitution Class by Richard Church - Part 1/4

[KillYourTeeVee]

restore the constitution!

we are americans first. stop fighting against people whose labels don't match yours. that's how they've divided us and conquered us. let's all fight to get our country back from the foreign banking cartel.

don't believe what you hear in mainstream media. do your own research on the internet and communicate with others.

end the federal reserve. end the constant wars. bring back a gold-backed currency.

RON PAUL 2012

[teeray12]

Can Richard Church upload more of his lectures? He is a great teacher.

[thombone]

pastebinDOTcom/gm2UV08D

[dasenuff]

the declaration was not signed on july 4th..it was signed on august the 2nd..FACT

[nikolayzou]

Great videos.

[paulrprichard]

Many complaints laid against King George III can indeed be laid on the DC government.

[paulrprichard]

"Role of the judiciary is to apply the law, not make law".

In recent years this has began to take place in the USA, so the legislature need to remind these judges of this point.

[MIDWEST507REPIN]

Ron Paul's Debate Day Money Bomb!! MAY 5, 2011!! Google+LibertyPAC

[muctopus]

I am 15 minutes in an it seems this should be titled "An Examination of Religious Influences on the Constitution".

[romeoneverdies]

@muctopus

well the constitutions IS a religious document ! it speaks of God and man dosent it ?

[KenMacMillan]

@muctopus A study of European & American history is largely a study of religion & how it effected life. Back in the day everything was done in the name of god.

[Aryaba]

I disagree with "Men cede to that government certain powers to secure their rights"

No, we assign certain responsibilities to government, but we do not cede any rights.

[richardc1976]

You are correct, Aryaba. We do not cede any rights. We do cede powers. For instance, we cede to government the power to execute justice, instead of retaining that power to ourselves.

[Downfurlife]

By :17 I already have a feeling this is going to be a disgusting and vile interpretation of the constitution. However, I might be mistaken - lets find out. See you in an hour ?

[Aryaba]

@Downfurlife Is that because he is religious? Or some other reason?

[Downfurlife]

@Aryaba Because he is theist and he clearly committed to this in the first 17 seconds. I have never had any professor nor have I seen in any other lecture this type of introduction(commitment so early). Jack M Balkin(of Yale) comes to mind - he can be Googled. Hell, even Ron Paul - but i believe Jack to be more informed. It just seems like it is an intention of planting seeds too early. I am no where near 1/2 way finished. So, I can not comment. I assume there will be bias.

[Aryaba]

@Downfurlife I watched the first two hours and am into the second two hours. He doesn't seem to be particularly theistic. Not that I would think that is a bad thing if he were. I do find it interesting that you do.

[Downfurlife]

@Aryaba Ya, I am not caught up to you. I gave my reason and gave 2 excellent examples - off the top of my head :) . I have never seen a scholar so quickly & openly disclose that type of information in this type of forum. The only reason I would assume, I assume incorrectly a lot, someone would do that is for an emotional attachment to/from the audience. I am not sure how his theism is relevant either? Theism is not a prerequisite to constitutional study as far as I am aware.

[Aryaba]

@Downfurlife I've seen plenty of professors talk about atheistic beliefs, I don't see how it is any different talking about theistic beliefs.

[Aryaba]

@Downfurlife Additionally, he talks about his background which happens to include churches. I think you are just anti-theistic.

[Downfurlife]

@Aryaba Oh, absolutely I am. As most intellectuals are. If you want to fault me for that you can reply. :)

[Aryaba]

@Downfurlife So him having worked with churches is automatically an issue with you. Got it.

[Downfurlife]

@Arya Ya of course. People who talk to invisible beings are locked up for our&their protection. We actually have a book called "Diagnostics Statistic Manual" produced by modern scholarship. This book is designed in half to recognize mental illness. All of the symptoms unless they fall under the safety, protectionOrumbrella of "religion" are clearly recognized as mental illness. Yet, somehow if we say "X" is a religious belief somehow it makes it ok. But if not religious it is an illness.

[Aryaba]

@Downfurlife How wonderfully tolerant and magnanimous of you.

[Downfurlife]

@Aryaba Fuck tolerance of ignorance. Toleration is assassination. Talking to invisible things qualifies someone insane in every circumstance except for one. If a person had a conversation with an invisible entity we as a caring or concerned friend would have them committed by force, suggest they get therapy or give them medication every time except the time when they hide their delusions under the umbrella of religion.

[Aryaba]

@Downfurlife It sounds like you have quite a few anger issues to work out yourself. You should follow your own advice.

[hamzah938]

@Downfurlife If indeed you SAW GOD, your face would hit the floor so f@cking fast , your nose would bleed ; and you would be unable to open your eyes or raise your head from fear, as you would have shit your pants like the immature child you are inside. Try reading Gods' book of Revelation, and I'm not talking about the Bible, I'm talking about the Quran. I strongly suggest you read the Quran before making any more comments. LOL

[Downfurlife]

@hamzah938 I do not know what that means? I would trip? A loving god would smash me on to the ground? Your god sounds petty and immature. I've read the Qu'ran. I have my own struggle(Jihad). If god is real it needs to get its ass on earth free palestine, punish criminals responsible for world banking, do something with the dirty water it gave us, address tsunami's, glue the earth together better(earth quakes) - Oh ya it shouldn't let babies suffer and die. Redesign out back

[MopDMTBARTL]

@Downfurlife - if god is real it needs to get its ass on earth? To understand God, you have to understand History and you have to realize that God gives free will. It's the good in men, taught to you by God's only begotten Son that brings Justice.

truthknowledge. com

[davidrodgersNJ]

@Downfurlife Indeed, most atheists think of themselves as "intellectuals," which is why they're so arrogant about their ability to understand everything, which is why they insist there is nothing beyond their understanding (e.g. God).

If you want to come across as an "intellectual," who's superior to all of those knuckle-dragging idiots who are too stupid to be atheists, it would help your case if you'd learn to write in proper sentences.

[helltrackrider]

Wow...this is actually a GREAT lecture; not that it is a lecture being as i enjoy this...but, cant wait for the next 3 parts...

oh, by the way...thanks a million for the "FOR LIBERTY"...

RON PAUL 2012

[airmanfoote]

Great upload. Major props bro!

[RonPaulLover123]

Oh, so this is actually 4 parts and this is the first one? I getcha

Thanks again

[crye55]

@RonPaulLover123 Yep, 4 parts total. At first we didn't know the introduction was gonna get filmed, but we got it. So now the series is complete.