The simple truth is that some men are hairy, and some are not. Some women have lots of hair, and some don't. Different races have different patterns for the distribution of hair. The most virile of all men, the tall negro male, is almost entirely lacking body hair.
@carlbags666 There's a ton of them, possibly even more than there were in the 60's and 70's. People who say that just haven't actually tried to look for them.
@OpheliaImmortal I am an avid collector of new and old music so I don't think thats the case. Its all a matter of taste! the bands that I find and others introduce me to that are modern just don't do it the same. just my taste. Also I will point out theres hundreds of albums in my collection that are new (last five years-ish) so its not like I'm saying I don't like modern stuff at all. My fave bands always tend to be 60s or 70s and ITS not my fault just my taste.
@carlbags666 That's reasonable. I just think it's unfair to say there aren't enough decent bands today when there's incredible groups like the Books, Youth Lagoon, Beirut, Gang Gang Dance, Animal Collective, Black Moth Super Rainbow, 7 Fields of Aphelion, Joanna Newsom, The National, Andrew Bird, Sufjan Stevens, etc etc etc.
@OpheliaImmortal there are loads of great modern bands, but its not enough. I think personally the ratio of good music to bad music from the 60s 70s was more favorable than it is today. Remember that even mainstream music was good back then but now only more underground/lesser known bands are worth listening to. but of course most people are going to disagree with me.
@carlbags666 Mostly true about the mainstream thing, although most of the bands worth listening to still weren't in the top 10 at many points. The direct top of the charts for the 60's and 70's was still mostly complete crap. At the same time, there weren't nearly as many truly "underground" bands then as there are now in the first place, largely due to recording and distribution restrictions. There were probably the same amount of local bands but with less of an outlet to make their music known
@OpheliaImmortal true.punk needed to happen first, when things started becoming more independant. but there are some real lost gems from the 60s/70s that most people miss.
I have adopted this as my theme song.
SolarionSeadragon 3 weeks ago
The simple truth is that some men are hairy, and some are not. Some women have lots of hair, and some don't. Different races have different patterns for the distribution of hair. The most virile of all men, the tall negro male, is almost entirely lacking body hair.
majestic93 1 month ago
es un poquito doloroso :(
elisaav 3 months ago
sadly there are not enough decent bands like this around today
carlbags666 5 months ago
@carlbags666 There's a ton of them, possibly even more than there were in the 60's and 70's. People who say that just haven't actually tried to look for them.
OpheliaImmortal 3 months ago
@OpheliaImmortal I am an avid collector of new and old music so I don't think thats the case. Its all a matter of taste! the bands that I find and others introduce me to that are modern just don't do it the same. just my taste. Also I will point out theres hundreds of albums in my collection that are new (last five years-ish) so its not like I'm saying I don't like modern stuff at all. My fave bands always tend to be 60s or 70s and ITS not my fault just my taste.
carlbags666 3 months ago
@carlbags666 That's reasonable. I just think it's unfair to say there aren't enough decent bands today when there's incredible groups like the Books, Youth Lagoon, Beirut, Gang Gang Dance, Animal Collective, Black Moth Super Rainbow, 7 Fields of Aphelion, Joanna Newsom, The National, Andrew Bird, Sufjan Stevens, etc etc etc.
OpheliaImmortal 3 months ago
@OpheliaImmortal there are loads of great modern bands, but its not enough. I think personally the ratio of good music to bad music from the 60s 70s was more favorable than it is today. Remember that even mainstream music was good back then but now only more underground/lesser known bands are worth listening to. but of course most people are going to disagree with me.
carlbags666 3 months ago
@carlbags666 Mostly true about the mainstream thing, although most of the bands worth listening to still weren't in the top 10 at many points. The direct top of the charts for the 60's and 70's was still mostly complete crap. At the same time, there weren't nearly as many truly "underground" bands then as there are now in the first place, largely due to recording and distribution restrictions. There were probably the same amount of local bands but with less of an outlet to make their music known
OpheliaImmortal 3 months ago
@OpheliaImmortal true.punk needed to happen first, when things started becoming more independant. but there are some real lost gems from the 60s/70s that most people miss.
carlbags666 3 months ago
marvelous solo!!
nino2112 6 months ago
Jesus Christ that solo.
Megajosh2 8 months ago
wow. this really sounds like ween.
i mean, ween really sounds like this >_<
snedersnap 9 months ago
Pink Floyd meets avantgarde punk.
And we love it.
DavidHallermusic 1 year ago 4
solo
spurtfather 1 year ago
Sounds like Mike Vitale making a guitar, at the chorus.
Always loved this.
0ldfinger 1 year ago
I've been meaning to look up Faust for ages, this is the first song i've heard by them and it's right up my street! That solo... I want to play it.
NotComingBack01 1 year ago
Such a dreamy, placid song, accentuated by sonic pain and one of the most corrosive guitar solos ever . . .
179rich 1 year ago 4
Great ending to an album.
zeclam 1 year ago 5
faust is too grand for words.
ApplwPiw 1 year ago 4
Amazing guitar solo....this should have been the solo for "Baby's On Fire" by Eno!! As disturbing and funny as anything on Here Come The Warm Jets.
hahasaidthecar 2 years ago 5
@hahasaidthecar Oh, dude ,Fripp's solo is GREAT ! and crazy too !
ksjoyjespeace 6 days ago
Classic
DanielBowden1975 2 years ago 8
One of the best song ever
nhdaniele 3 years ago 11