Added: 2 years ago
From: Destined4Life
Views: 4,893
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (22)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • GREAT VIDEO MAN

  • dude love the vid, even if they have fixed it, i also love ur attitude and f+++ all the politics on the forums as well, also love the music cut. K all that being said i also am curious to why u wore the torc then took off seems like another unwanted variable for the test if ur trying to prove a point, also by the comments left u can tell this was a few updates ago and since the wb days that means a lot has changed, it is currently update 11, when was this made?

  • Does ooze guard stack?  And can you please give us the update you're on when you made this video?

  • Does this still work? I haven't played DDO since update 5 hit (left the same day I tried it) so I don't know.

  • You sound like the joker !!!!

  • really educative video nice

  • keep it up !

  • Liked at the "Gay pirate" part :D

  • So if I have 6 Disintegration guards on my barbarian and I def see them go off all the time compared to weraing just 1. The devs are now aware of this issue and are calling it a bug.(which means they are gonna nerf it) sad ... It makes sense that if you wear more then one of the same guard, the more of a chance of them going off. To nerf this is stupid. It makes sense that if you have more of the same guard that it should proc more.. I will be mad if they nerf my barbarian and his 6 guards.. =/

  • Well done..

    Thanks for clearing out the trolls

  • Does this download onto mac?

  • can you post 1conc opp + toc version of this by any chance? im almost convinced that they stack each other but hey... yk49 on the forum here, OP of the proc rate thread.

  • Blah must Die. That is all.

  • Nice video, but there is a problem here. You should not have used the Torc in the first test but not in the second. If the point is to definitively prove that multiple concordant opposition items do provide a benefit over just one, then you need to keep all other variables constant between tests. I'm not saying more than one is pointless - I believe it is beneficial - but one could make the argument that the slow regen rate the second time was solely due to the loss of the Torc.

  • Good point, however, since the torc only regens spell points, it's quite obvious just from the hitpoint side that the con ops procs are stacking.

  • Yes, clearly there is a difference based on the hitpoint regen rate differences. However, it would be a mistake to equate hitpoint regen rates with spellpoint regen rates. There is no indication that the proc rate is the same for each - indeed, the rate is believed to be higher for the hitpoint portion anyway. Unfortunately this video offers little proof of any benefits regarding spellpoint regen, due to the use of the Torc in the first test case.

  • Nice post. Only pile-ons without multiple CO's would think they don't stack. Its pretty freaking obvious. Torc is still king though baby!

  • Thanks for doing this! (This is Trillea)

  • Nice.

  • time to STFU shade

    thanks Jugz

  • DIE ALEX

  • this should shut up the naysayers juggs. thx for the vid proof

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more