Yo DF I watch your videos and they are very good. Don't waste your time making videos about those guys Keep spreading the truth and I did think Jesus will mind your traffic tickets. Jesus forgave Paul for what he did to Stephen and the rest of the church so i think ur ok And if those guys can't stop worrying your past they don't know Jesus or the Father fight evil with kindness.
@Digitalflava- By now, I would have a lawyer Digitalflava. I think you may want to check into it, I am sure you have a case. They, I am sure, are not forgiven Apostle Paul either, because he did not go to Tony smith church. Sometime people, can let someone lead them into trouble, but it can be a blessing for others.
BROTHER! THEY OWE YOU AN APOLOGY!!!! The only "near" crime that you committed that I see is going to McDonald's...that stuff is POISON (LOL). Way to break down an allegation. Thank Yahshuah for bringing you out of this.
@unlimitedj6v27...they'll never do it. Those "high-minded prideful nuts" will NEVER come out and say,"Im sorry;my bad." Pride is their father and their father is DESTRUCTION.
According to living disciplined, and praying for others. Acts 19:15-17 is one of my favorite verses. For example I could be friends with a talented guy in church, People from a famous mega-chuch television place respecting me, my relative is this etc., while the measuring stick of my own walk with G-d can get forgotten. My hoping is no matter what talents I see, that the father gets the glory.
@tourok12 - this is a young person that right now want to know the truth about the gospel to get set free, and to stay free. I will be praying for you. Blessing to you.
How's everything going? Finding friends who can help your walk with G-d, is a great thing to see outside or inside a church building. I could ask for prayer if its needed to break evil spirits that could influence bad habits, a true biblical disciple is an important guide since the enemy can do his work as well. Matthew 12:43-45
hlywarrior 10 months ago---Quicktrac I was wrong when I said that "for" meant instead of.God showed me where I was wrong in my teaching & so I, like all of us are or should be at some point, stand corrected. Even if my belief that women dont have to wear a 2nd veil for salvation is right, if I teach it wrong, even slightly then I am condemned by my words, so I thank God for reproof, no matter how small it may seem!
I told you that LaDarius was on the up and up. I know him personally and trust it, he is the real deal. He will walk up to ANYBODY and proclaim his God. If the man tells you that he is not guilty, believe me, he is not. We went to high school together. I know him better than anyone up here and I don't have a reason to lie. I'm not saying that he is perfect, but I know his character and his drive to please Yahuwah. Tony Smith is dealing with the wrong man now. Big L is gonna come with that word.
Wow, without a doubt case closed. There is no reason to keep going back and forth with them after this, this speaks or matter of fact SCREAMS the truth loud and clear of the dishonesty in twogc. I would say the lesson that u can learn to avoid another situation like this is to "abstain from all appearance of evil" and "dont let your good be evil spoken of" bc of gainsayers, but sometimes experience is the best teacher.
hlywarrior you are a Benedict Arnold, WOW when that video on me was made you were like OH YEAH chevythe player got exposed
Then when the TRUTH came out you were all over the place in disbelief cause their story fell apart so bad, they just went online and said every user name like mine is automatically me, WHAT A JOKE
You are talkling tough here, but you NEVER said anything like that on one of the "TWOGC yard dogs" vids, unhly your a washed up joke
@chevytheplayer please, theres a difference when accusations are made by gainsayers that are false and backed up by solid evidence as opposed to accusations which are confirmed by substantial evidence.
@chevytheplayer Chevy, long before TWOGC came with any accusations of unholy behavior on your behalf I already had substantial evidence that u were a hypocrite, and still have it to this day! So basically just bc they were exposed for lying on this bro doesnt mean that they were lying on u, nd I have proof, so dont expect any sympathy.
@chevytheplayer u gave them a reason to expose you for your faults, this man had done nothing and therefore suffered wrongly by FALSE accusations so he has more to glory of than u! 1 Pet2:19-20"For this is thankworthy, if a man for conscience toward God endure grief, suffering wrongfully. FOR WHAT GLORY IS IT,IF, WHEN YE BE BUFFETED FOR YOUR FAULTS,YE SHALL TAKE IT PATIENTLY?but if, when ye do well, and suffer for it, ye take it patiently, this is acceptable with God."
@chevytheplayer So dont get mad when you dont get any glory for suffering rightfully so just take it for what it is and repent and confess your sin so that u can have some sort of glory by the blood of the lamb. Other than that, Im not going to continue to go back and forth with some1 saying that there not guilty when theyve already been convicted by solid proof, if u continue to express ur innocence then some1 might listen and believe u but it wont be me!
Also where is your proof you got on me, I mean why hold back, just present what "substantial proof" you got.... wait you can't cause you made that up
If your gonna agree Jesse is wrong here, you have to agree he was wrong on me too, or else you show your just a hater of someone who took you to school on head coverings
Ladies and Gents just go on the Pastor Gino exposed Tony Smith vid, and go to page 2-4 and see why hly is still on his hate trip
@chevytheplayer I also have those debates 4 any1 who wants to see them as well as the proof of his unGodly behavior. Also, chevy dont forget to tell them to go to "quintoncole pj exposed; Re-exposed" pages 2-7 for more of the debate other than that Im not goin to waste my time.
please, I just ignored you cause you left your previous argument and tried posting some 15 paragraph report, I mean unless something was added to the bible, it makes no sense for your argument to change so much all of a sudden
hly if some satanic cult said something bad about chevytheplayer, you would be on there saying "Yeah I knew he was doing that" and "I knew for so long he was a bad, bad man"
its sad, after I exposed u even "nobodys" were taking you to school
looking back, at our debate, I seen another brother named ehall1967 had the SAME DEBATE with you and came to the same conclusion, and you told him basically you won't debate him till he accepts what you said
hlywarior--Mril80 is just like the pharisees who constantly picked at Jesus to try to catch him in his words bc they could not withstand his wisdom.Notice Im having a conversation with someone over a particular subject not involving him(matter of fact I told him to not comment to me bc I believe he is a reprobate), but he keeps making accusations against me trying to defame my character!Lets see how long he continues in this childish attempt to tarnish my name by his bigoted opinions.
@chevytheplayer Listen just to prove my point on here that u twisted my words; Proof #1. "Tell me when you said its IMPOSSIBLE for you to be deceived, did I twist what you said?" In Mt 24 it says "For there shall arise false Christs, and false prophets, and shall shew great signs and wonders; insomuch that, if it were possible, they shall deceive the very elect."
@chevytheplayer So what was meant when I said that its impossible for me to be decieved (eternally, we all start off in deception before coming to Gods full truth) by false prophets, is that bc of God its not possible for me to be decieved forever inspite of the great signs and wonders that false Christs present with their false message.Thats scriptural bc i am Gods elect!
@chevytheplayer Proof #2. When I said "Quicktrac I was wrong when I said that "for" meant instead of." I was talking about in that particular context of scripture. In webster "For" can mean "In place of" or "instead of" but in that particular context of scripture 1Cor11:15 it simply means "as", as in "given her AS a covering" as opposed to "given her instead of a covering" there is a difference.
@chevytheplayer In webster it says "For: 2 a : as being or constituting (taken for a fool)" the ex can also mean taken "as" a fool. In 1cor it means "given her for"as" a covering". Instead of as a preposition means "in place of" acc. to webster(instead of: in place of : as a substitute for or alternative to).
@chevytheplayer No thats not what im sayin so thats false as well. Basically what Im sayin is, given the context of the scripture 1 cor11:15, "IT CAN ONLY MEAN" that "God has given her hair as a covering", as opposed to "given her hair instead of a covering" based on laws of the English language.
@chevytheplayer Paul was saying earlier in the chp vs 5-6 that if the Corinthian women did not wear some sort of wrap to cover their head (not including their God given covering which is their hair) according to their custom, then it would be the same as if she cut off all of her hair in Gods sight, bc she would be in rebellion to the rule ar authority over her which required her to do so.
@chevytheplayer it wouldve been an offence to the other greeks in that culture if she did not wear the traditional head covering, and Paul said in the chp before 10:32"Give none offence, neither to the Jews, nor to the Gentiles, nor to the church of God:"Give none offence, neither to the Jews, nor to the Gentiles, nor to the church of God:".
@chevytheplayer Wearing the traditional headcovering while praying or prophesying which was the cutural norm in Corinth, was not a custom that was taught by the apostles in the churches of God at large. The reason being is that a woman was given her hair to be a covering by God.
@chevytheplayer A womans long unbound hair is a covering to her, if a woman doesnt have long hair etc then she needs to be covered by something else. As long as shes covered by something when praying and prophesying generally then shes ok in the sight of God, unless her society requires otherwise.
@chevytheplayer Thats why Paul said in vs 16' We(The apostles) have no such custom, neither the churches of God." Her long hair can serve as a covering since a covering is anything that covers.This is for all to see the truth about headcoverings, its a shame that this guys stuck on headcoverings and theres so many other issues to deal with in the church. U dont have understanding chevy.
hly AGAIN stop twisting the scripture to make it fit your angle read the whole thing please, notice every reason you give falls apart when you read the verse
1cor11 v 4: Every man praying or prophesying, having his head covered, dishonoureth his head
But every woman that prayeth or prophesieth with her head uncovered dishonoureth her head: for that is even all one as if she were shaven.
The bible is saying one must cover and one must not, YET THEY BOTH HAVE HAIR
@chevytheplayer 1 must cover their head "WHILE PRAYING AND PROPHESYING" and the other must not is the correct reading. Now what to cover or not cover with while praying etc is another topic. Now its a sin for a man to have long hair(or let his hair grow long) in the 1st place whether hes praying etc or not, but the scripts never says that its a shame for a woman to have short hair.
you said "Now what to cover or not cover with while praying etc is another topic. "
THAT IS THE ONLY TOPIC WERE TALKING ABOUT, there is only ONE head and the bible said she must have it COVERED meaning she must take action to have it COVERED
Look man, I know you want to believe your right cause a devil told you, that you were gonna be perfect, but your not making sense, for each verse you have a contradictory explanation that hurts your other arguments
@chevytheplayer Now when I said, "Now what to cover or not cover with while praying etc is another topic. " I was correcting what u said, "The bible is saying one must cover and one must not, YET THEY BOTH HAVE HAIR " by 1st letting u know that the bible was in fact emphasizing when one should or shouldnt cover their head which was "while praying or prophesying".
@chevytheplayer I first distinguished between the topics of when one should or shouldnt be covered, with what one could or could not cover their heads with in general. A man can never cover his head with long hair regardless of when it is. Also,seeing that u cant answer my question, I guess that settles it once again with more witnesses to observe the debate. Some1 needs to step in and let u know to just stop, bc ur making urself look even more like a fool.
there is a difference between not answering a question, and you not wanting to hear an answer, and you my lost friend just don't want to hear that answer
The bible doesn't say what material to cover the heads with, but he said you MUST cover your head not the hair already on your head but YOU must TAKE ACTION to COVER YOUR head
Oh and that "more witnesses need to step in" statement just proves you are tapping out... again, whats a matter can't handle ur own problems?
@chevytheplayer Another thing,If Im wrong bc a devil told me I was, then why r u so hardpressed to debate me?U should just let me b deceived if I wont recieve truth, right?R u doin this for pride, just to say u "crushed" some1?Ur fruit says that u love or are fond of quarrel and strife, which is the very def of being contentious.Notice"I crushed you", "I destroyed you with scripture", "Im calling your bluff", my point exactly.
hly weren't you the one to ask why I was off topic, and how I was "not answering your quest" yet all of a sudden you are asking for someone to step in and end your suffering, and your telling me if I'm debating you cause of pride.
Last I checked, your the one that couldn't let a lose go, and decided to kick this "debate" up and I'm telling you the SAME thing I told you a year ago, while you come up with all kinds of new angles to make ur argument work
@chevytheplayer Needless to say u wont answer my question, ull just babble on about other things to get out of answering. Thats why I cut guys like u off, bc ull just go deeper into more ungodliness like the script says.2 Ti2:16 "But shun profane and vain babblings: for they will increase unto more ungodliness."Ur just babbling.
Babbling- to talk enthusiastically or excessively
Hmm who here types 5 paragraphs for one question?
Who here says they can't be deceived?
Who here says God told him he was gonna be perfect?
No son, I say the same thing as I said 9 months ago, my argument hasn't changed, but yours has at every step but it makes as much sense as the argument you made 9 months ago, its a shame how if you look back my words stay the same, and yours are TOTALLY different
@chevytheplayer Its only a sin for her to willingly shave or have her hair shaved(to scrape her hair off her head with a razor) or shorn( to cut off the hair[completely] from her head with shears) or cut with either utensil to the point that its no longer long(or hangs down the head; as a veil).
@chevytheplayer Women who have cancer or has their hair cut low or off unwillingly have not sinned, but its still required for them to cover their head with something as a sign of submission to the authority over her while praying or prophesying so that it wont offend those who watch her pray etc.(1 Cor11:13"Judge in yourselves: is it comely that a woman pray unto God uncovered?"
You do know the hair falling out is because of chemotherapy (radiation) so your hair falling out excuse just fell on its face.
Also the scripture said HAVING NO COVERING IS EQUAL TO BEING SHAVEN, according to you that means if she shaved her head willingly, why are you making up things as you go?
I stuck with my first argument, and you have to look for ways to dodge and ignore what is WRITTEN PLAINLY in the scriptures
@chevytheplayer Even when shes not praying etc around people she still has to be covered with something to not offend the angels which are encamped about her at all times, by rebelling against Gods orderof creation. 1Cor11:10"For this cause ought the woman to have power(a noticable sign of submission to her authority) on her head because of the angels."
@chevytheplayer Thats why God gave her hair so that she could let it grow long and use it as a covering when praying or prophesying at any time. If u would just listen and respect Gods word u can be taught, but u cant see past Gino whos only a man.If im wrong u can never say that I didnt repent bc Ive already done that, thats how I got further truth.
LOL, first off, what is coming out of your mouth isn't God's word
You type a message saying that went you prayed you heard a voice that said you would become "PERFECT" and you said God said that too you, well I'm here to say it wasn't God cause Moses, Job, Peter, Paul, NONE of the men of God in the scriptures were told they were gonna be "perfect" or become perfect
Thats probably why your acting like what you say is truth cause a devil deceived you LONG ago
@chevytheplayer The only reason I left the first part out was to pretty much fit the comment on the page, u could look it up urself. Now, what did he mean by "if any man be contentious"? Why did he say this? Bc of those in that culture who was self rightous about keeping the laws of their land, which was that women should cover their heads while praying and prophesying etc with other means than their hair universally as Paul taught.
@chevytheplayer They loved to fight against the revelation of the truth that Paul taught, that a womans hair was given to her to be a covering by God, which was against the traditions of the elders in that area even as uall do. So Paul reassured them that the doctrine that a woman ought to wear a certain type of veil (such as 1 thats man made) was not universal by saying in vs 16"We have no such custom, neither the churches of God."
where did paul teach that? Paul plainly said if you don't have your head covered you dishonor yourself, AND its EQUAL to having your head shaven
So now Paul is declaring rules, and denouncing his own declaration? LOL
Also most women have long hair, yet they submit to NO Authority, so your argument fails AGAIN, the bible said a SIGN of authority not something that everyone naturally has, but something that must show she SUBMITS to authority
@chevytheplayer Thats what those gentiles in that area was contentious about the revelation of the God given covering.Quest, do u believe that God gave a woman her hair for a covering as Paul said, or not?
@chevytheplayer Oh, and just for the record to answer ur reply " You do know the hair falling out is because of chemotherapy (radiation) so your hair falling out excuse just fell on its face." You do know that the cause of a person having to recieve chemotherapy is bc of cancer right?
AGAIN I SAY, cancer doesn't effect the hair, CHEMOTHERAPY does, please do some learning cause it seems like your biblical and medical knowledge are inadequate, but your willingness to make up meanings, and come up with excuses are still in full swing
Question, did they have Chemotherapy in the days of Paul? If not what is the point of you even attempting to make this argument using bible?
@chevytheplayer So in fact the root cause of such a person loosing their hair, is bc of them having to get treatment for the cancer, so Im not exactly sure how that makes my argument fall on its face.
It was a 1+1=2 example.Anyways, Im done its not my fault u dont understand.
@chevytheplayer BTW, u didnt answer my question flat out, u gave a passage of scripture without explaining the interpretation of the scriptures. It was a round about answer at best to avoid a direct answer, in an attempt to make it seem as though u answered it with scripture, FAIL. If u recall it was a yes or no question, "Do you believe that God gave women their hair for a covering like Paul taught in 1 Co11:15."My answer is YES. It was a simple yes or no but u couldnt even do that.
@chevytheplayer I thoroghly explain my answers so that people like u can "GET IT", but obviously you dont. I dont run from questions, I meet them head on. Also I dont just answer a question in a round about way, I answer them straight up and not only do I stay on the surface, I go into depth so that my view can clearly be understood by the recipient,but thats not always the case.U could learn my brother acc to humanity,bc its not in Christ.
So basically YOUR allowed to answer THOROUGHLY but I'm not?
Double standards anyone?
Also, like I said before who ever said you were gonna be perfect lied to you, cause it wasn't God. I know that for a fact especially after these "debates"
You know how many times your explanation has changed?? I notice you left the greek translations alone, cause it killed your argument
What you typed now is COMPLETELY different from 9 months ago, yet what I'm saying has STAYED THE SAME
@chevytheplayer What are u talking about?I have continued to use greek definitions throughout, what do I have to type in "In the greek it says"? Or the greek word is? Please! And when did I tell u that u typed in too much in ur answer? Double standard?
hly point out on post you made with "greek translations" cause before you were typing these weird greek words like TEZKOS, but when Imheavenlyoperated cracked that code, you all of a sudden abandon that argument
No son you getting your word definition the same place your getting your scriptural explanations... from thin air
@chevytheplayer And concerning your babbling accusation and to help u understand the scripture in 2 Ti 2:16 a lil better, I would suggest u look at it a little closer. U said "hlywarrior you turn a simple one to two paragraph answer into 5 on every question asked."Paul never said any kind of babbling was to be shunned, if u look deeper he said it was "VAIN BABBLINGS" that should be avoided, for(in this context FOR means BECAUSE) they will increase unto more ungodliness."
Look man you have to stop using the "in context" excuse cause for some reason you think "in context" means "insert words here to help argument"
I'm pretty sure thats not how it works
And yes, according to your definition, your words are vain cause they change like the wind, one day you say "Paul said only Corinth... then you say Paul said the law was not for the church..., and on.... and on.... and on but I STAY with the SAME points from 9 months ago till now
@chevytheplayer This is exactly what Im talking about when it comes to ur conversation, and I have to repent before all on here bc I lied. I said I was done with u and your dead debate but allowed u to provoke me to get involved with this foolishness. I should observe an old adage, which is to "never argue with a fool, bc people from a distance cannot tell which is which."That is exactly why Paul wrote that to Timothy, and now I understand why.
Didn't you tell me to show the folks where you "whipped" me on the PJ re-exposed comments???
Please don't even try to quote Paul, cause tomorrow you may say he didn't say it, the you'll say he did say it but only to Corinth, LOL same cycle
hly just go back into the shadows and wait for another "diss" video to be made on me so you can be the first to post, lol, cause making you jump from verse to verse changing your story is getting boring
@chevytheplayer God didnt give a woman her hair "in place(stead) of a covering bc her hair is a covering(anything that covers).So the reason I corrected myself was bc i wanted to be accurate in how I explained the doctrine to the best of my ability! Do me a favor and stop filling up this guys comments section trying to rehabilitate ur name by "challenging" me on a dead debate. Ur case has been closed and now u have just further exposed urself by trying to "expose" me.
@chevytheplayer So no need to write back esp when this vid had nothing to do with u anyway but ur obviously still upset for being revealed as the fake that u are, and want to claim that u exposed some1 else but likewise was exposed.
please man, what "substantial proof" did you have on me before TWOGC??
the only info you got was that I was sharper in the bible then you, and you were mad I made you look foolish, so please
Second the same people who made this vid made the vid on me, and they were both proven wrong but even after that you still said "no it must be chevy, I don't care if the info is wrong, IT MUST BE CHEVY"
hly I'm gonna warn the folk about you using those private messages u sent me
@chevytheplayer Uhhh ok, whatever ur talking about. Oh wait a minute ur talkin about those PM's that I sent u in that debate that we had that u took and twisted my words all out of context to try to discredit me and the truth I was speaking, like ur doin now, rriiiiggghhhhttttt!!!!
twisting? Tell me when you said its IMPOSSIBLE for you to be deceived, did I twist what you said?
When you said that if I don't agree with what your saying I'm messing with a child of God and God will be angry if I don't give up my argument and admit your right, was that something I twisted?
please man, just make does "documents" you have public so we can all see what chevytheplayer said to hurt your feelings, I'm CALLING YOU OUT ON YOUR BLUFF
@chevytheplayer I know what ur talkin about now, no worry I still have those documents on file for any1 to look at as well so they can take the brain that God has blessed them with and come to a sound conclusion of who's actually tellin the truth or not, so go head and post dont talk about it only, ur so predictable with your desperation to try to clear ur tarnished name.
no the vid has something to do with me cause the same person who slandered digital, slandered me
Look man, I know it must hurt being taken to school in scriptures by an "upstart" then after that the upstart starts a random youtube and gets over 100,000 views, while your still licking your wounds and jumping on ANYTHING that says anything bad about me no matter how foolish it sounds
face it man, you got left in the dust and now your a full time hater, LOL, its sad
Good job, sir. I'd be interested to see what these folks have to say now. If they don't repent and apologize, then like their own pastor says they will "lift their eyes up in hell". On a side note, you might want to check into getting your record expunged.
Wow!!!!!!!! you did it again I can see the EGG ALL OVER Tony's, Keith's, Kerry and Jessy's face. This is TYPICAL behavior of the Way Of God Church. (Cult)
@mysupermansmile - Thanks, my sister. I got another one coming. The next one will rip the mask off of Tony's face. If TWOGC can't see who their pastor is after this one, Yahuwah is gonna do it.
@digitalflava Don't worry about what kerry or any of those fools say about you, they are just jealous because you had the courage to stand and walk out of that cult. So expect anything from a bunch of weaklings and confused misfits. In the end let us pray for "Kerry the wife Beater"
@mysupermansmile He really is nailing them to the cross! every attempt blows up in their phony faces.If nothing else, this shows "ALL" just how Holy these fakes are, what Saved Man or woman would resort to blatant LIES?? the ones like Kerry,Keith,Jessy, & of course their beloved LEADER<<<TONY SMITH! thats the kind.
@mysupermansmile - this young man has a powerful minstry. He has a laid down life for the THE MOST HIGH. His mother I am sure is powerful to, as well as his father I'am sure. THE MASTER, was in jail to for things done in good. To the small little boys, that don't know how to fight in the army of the MOST HIGH, you need to let one of the women lead in your church maybe, just maybe.lol.
@RINGO4LIFE - Yeah, part 3 was the last part. When I said "The Next One....", I meant that I have another video apart from this one. A different video, different title.
I ain't on either side but good come-back.
Darkshadowsfan2009 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Darkshadowsfan2009 watch?v=mIB6nOj04_g
jessejay777 11 months ago
Yo DF I watch your videos and they are very good. Don't waste your time making videos about those guys Keep spreading the truth and I did think Jesus will mind your traffic tickets. Jesus forgave Paul for what he did to Stephen and the rest of the church so i think ur ok And if those guys can't stop worrying your past they don't know Jesus or the Father fight evil with kindness.
Stocktrader561 1 year ago
@Stocktrader561 - Thanks alot.
digitalflava 1 year ago
@Digitalflava- By now, I would have a lawyer Digitalflava. I think you may want to check into it, I am sure you have a case. They, I am sure, are not forgiven Apostle Paul either, because he did not go to Tony smith church. Sometime people, can let someone lead them into trouble, but it can be a blessing for others.
1thebloodofjesus 1 year ago
I deem jesse and keith OWNED!!!! DF keep doin yo thang
BDW2006 1 year ago
BROTHER! THEY OWE YOU AN APOLOGY!!!! The only "near" crime that you committed that I see is going to McDonald's...that stuff is POISON (LOL). Way to break down an allegation. Thank Yahshuah for bringing you out of this.
Now, those crooked COPS are guilty big time!!!
unlimitedj6v27 1 year ago
@unlimitedj6v27...they'll never do it. Those "high-minded prideful nuts" will NEVER come out and say,"Im sorry;my bad." Pride is their father and their father is DESTRUCTION.
ImHeavenlyOPERATED 1 year ago
@ImHeavenlyOPERATED you are definitely correct about that!
unlimitedj6v27 1 year ago
MY HAT OFF TO YA BRUH!!!! TAKE A BOW!!!!
srvalmil 1 year ago
@srvalmil - My Christ be glorified. Thank you.
digitalflava 1 year ago
According to living disciplined, and praying for others. Acts 19:15-17 is one of my favorite verses. For example I could be friends with a talented guy in church, People from a famous mega-chuch television place respecting me, my relative is this etc., while the measuring stick of my own walk with G-d can get forgotten. My hoping is no matter what talents I see, that the father gets the glory.
tourok12 1 year ago
@tourok12 - this is a young person that right now want to know the truth about the gospel to get set free, and to stay free. I will be praying for you. Blessing to you.
1thebloodofjesus 1 year ago
How's everything going? Finding friends who can help your walk with G-d, is a great thing to see outside or inside a church building. I could ask for prayer if its needed to break evil spirits that could influence bad habits, a true biblical disciple is an important guide since the enemy can do his work as well. Matthew 12:43-45
tourok12 1 year ago
hlywarrior 10 months ago---Quicktrac I was wrong when I said that "for" meant instead of.God showed me where I was wrong in my teaching & so I, like all of us are or should be at some point, stand corrected. Even if my belief that women dont have to wear a 2nd veil for salvation is right, if I teach it wrong, even slightly then I am condemned by my words, so I thank God for reproof, no matter how small it may seem!
chevytheplayer 1 year ago
I told you that LaDarius was on the up and up. I know him personally and trust it, he is the real deal. He will walk up to ANYBODY and proclaim his God. If the man tells you that he is not guilty, believe me, he is not. We went to high school together. I know him better than anyone up here and I don't have a reason to lie. I'm not saying that he is perfect, but I know his character and his drive to please Yahuwah. Tony Smith is dealing with the wrong man now. Big L is gonna come with that word.
BibleTranslator 1 year ago
Wow, without a doubt case closed. There is no reason to keep going back and forth with them after this, this speaks or matter of fact SCREAMS the truth loud and clear of the dishonesty in twogc. I would say the lesson that u can learn to avoid another situation like this is to "abstain from all appearance of evil" and "dont let your good be evil spoken of" bc of gainsayers, but sometimes experience is the best teacher.
hlywarrior 1 year ago
@hlywarrior
hlywarrior you are a Benedict Arnold, WOW when that video on me was made you were like OH YEAH chevythe player got exposed
Then when the TRUTH came out you were all over the place in disbelief cause their story fell apart so bad, they just went online and said every user name like mine is automatically me, WHAT A JOKE
You are talkling tough here, but you NEVER said anything like that on one of the "TWOGC yard dogs" vids, unhly your a washed up joke
chevytheplayer 1 year ago
@chevytheplayer please, theres a difference when accusations are made by gainsayers that are false and backed up by solid evidence as opposed to accusations which are confirmed by substantial evidence.
hlywarrior 1 year ago
@chevytheplayer Chevy, long before TWOGC came with any accusations of unholy behavior on your behalf I already had substantial evidence that u were a hypocrite, and still have it to this day! So basically just bc they were exposed for lying on this bro doesnt mean that they were lying on u, nd I have proof, so dont expect any sympathy.
hlywarrior 1 year ago
@chevytheplayer u gave them a reason to expose you for your faults, this man had done nothing and therefore suffered wrongly by FALSE accusations so he has more to glory of than u! 1 Pet2:19-20"For this is thankworthy, if a man for conscience toward God endure grief, suffering wrongfully. FOR WHAT GLORY IS IT,IF, WHEN YE BE BUFFETED FOR YOUR FAULTS,YE SHALL TAKE IT PATIENTLY?but if, when ye do well, and suffer for it, ye take it patiently, this is acceptable with God."
hlywarrior 1 year ago
@chevytheplayer So dont get mad when you dont get any glory for suffering rightfully so just take it for what it is and repent and confess your sin so that u can have some sort of glory by the blood of the lamb. Other than that, Im not going to continue to go back and forth with some1 saying that there not guilty when theyve already been convicted by solid proof, if u continue to express ur innocence then some1 might listen and believe u but it wont be me!
hlywarrior 1 year ago
@hlywarrior
Also where is your proof you got on me, I mean why hold back, just present what "substantial proof" you got.... wait you can't cause you made that up
If your gonna agree Jesse is wrong here, you have to agree he was wrong on me too, or else you show your just a hater of someone who took you to school on head coverings
Ladies and Gents just go on the Pastor Gino exposed Tony Smith vid, and go to page 2-4 and see why hly is still on his hate trip
chevytheplayer 1 year ago
@chevytheplayer I also have those debates 4 any1 who wants to see them as well as the proof of his unGodly behavior. Also, chevy dont forget to tell them to go to "quintoncole pj exposed; Re-exposed" pages 2-7 for more of the debate other than that Im not goin to waste my time.
hlywarrior 1 year ago
@hlywarrior
please, I just ignored you cause you left your previous argument and tried posting some 15 paragraph report, I mean unless something was added to the bible, it makes no sense for your argument to change so much all of a sudden
hly if some satanic cult said something bad about chevytheplayer, you would be on there saying "Yeah I knew he was doing that" and "I knew for so long he was a bad, bad man"
its sad, after I exposed u even "nobodys" were taking you to school
chevytheplayer 1 year ago
@hlywarrior
looking back, at our debate, I seen another brother named ehall1967 had the SAME DEBATE with you and came to the same conclusion, and you told him basically you won't debate him till he accepts what you said
same thing over and over with you
chevytheplayer 1 year ago
hlywarior--Mril80 is just like the pharisees who constantly picked at Jesus to try to catch him in his words bc they could not withstand his wisdom.Notice Im having a conversation with someone over a particular subject not involving him(matter of fact I told him to not comment to me bc I believe he is a reprobate), but he keeps making accusations against me trying to defame my character!Lets see how long he continues in this childish attempt to tarnish my name by his bigoted opinions.
chevytheplayer 1 year ago
@chevytheplayer Listen just to prove my point on here that u twisted my words; Proof #1. "Tell me when you said its IMPOSSIBLE for you to be deceived, did I twist what you said?" In Mt 24 it says "For there shall arise false Christs, and false prophets, and shall shew great signs and wonders; insomuch that, if it were possible, they shall deceive the very elect."
hlywarrior 1 year ago
@chevytheplayer So what was meant when I said that its impossible for me to be decieved (eternally, we all start off in deception before coming to Gods full truth) by false prophets, is that bc of God its not possible for me to be decieved forever inspite of the great signs and wonders that false Christs present with their false message.Thats scriptural bc i am Gods elect!
hlywarrior 1 year ago
@chevytheplayer Proof #2. When I said "Quicktrac I was wrong when I said that "for" meant instead of." I was talking about in that particular context of scripture. In webster "For" can mean "In place of" or "instead of" but in that particular context of scripture 1Cor11:15 it simply means "as", as in "given her AS a covering" as opposed to "given her instead of a covering" there is a difference.
hlywarrior 1 year ago
@chevytheplayer In webster it says "For: 2 a : as being or constituting (taken for a fool)" the ex can also mean taken "as" a fool. In 1cor it means "given her for"as" a covering". Instead of as a preposition means "in place of" acc. to webster(instead of: in place of : as a substitute for or alternative to).
hlywarrior 1 year ago
@hlywarrior
hly see where you got caught you said "can also mean" when you said that you basically said "this is what I believe from MY perspective"
Please man the bible says:
For if the woman be not covered, let her also be shorn: but if it be a shame for a woman to be shorn or shaven, let her be covered.
Now why would it be said that a woman SHOULD have her hair cut off as PUNISHMENT for being uncovered, if by your definition, its already off?
chevytheplayer 1 year ago
@chevytheplayer No thats not what im sayin so thats false as well. Basically what Im sayin is, given the context of the scripture 1 cor11:15, "IT CAN ONLY MEAN" that "God has given her hair as a covering", as opposed to "given her hair instead of a covering" based on laws of the English language.
hlywarrior 1 year ago
@chevytheplayer Paul was saying earlier in the chp vs 5-6 that if the Corinthian women did not wear some sort of wrap to cover their head (not including their God given covering which is their hair) according to their custom, then it would be the same as if she cut off all of her hair in Gods sight, bc she would be in rebellion to the rule ar authority over her which required her to do so.
hlywarrior 1 year ago
@chevytheplayer it wouldve been an offence to the other greeks in that culture if she did not wear the traditional head covering, and Paul said in the chp before 10:32"Give none offence, neither to the Jews, nor to the Gentiles, nor to the church of God:"Give none offence, neither to the Jews, nor to the Gentiles, nor to the church of God:".
hlywarrior 1 year ago
@chevytheplayer Wearing the traditional headcovering while praying or prophesying which was the cutural norm in Corinth, was not a custom that was taught by the apostles in the churches of God at large. The reason being is that a woman was given her hair to be a covering by God.
hlywarrior 1 year ago
@chevytheplayer A womans long unbound hair is a covering to her, if a woman doesnt have long hair etc then she needs to be covered by something else. As long as shes covered by something when praying and prophesying generally then shes ok in the sight of God, unless her society requires otherwise.
hlywarrior 1 year ago
@chevytheplayer Thats why Paul said in vs 16' We(The apostles) have no such custom, neither the churches of God." Her long hair can serve as a covering since a covering is anything that covers.This is for all to see the truth about headcoverings, its a shame that this guys stuck on headcoverings and theres so many other issues to deal with in the church. U dont have understanding chevy.
hlywarrior 1 year ago
@hlywarrior
hly AGAIN stop twisting the scripture to make it fit your angle read the whole thing please, notice every reason you give falls apart when you read the verse
1cor11 v 4: Every man praying or prophesying, having his head covered, dishonoureth his head
But every woman that prayeth or prophesieth with her head uncovered dishonoureth her head: for that is even all one as if she were shaven.
The bible is saying one must cover and one must not, YET THEY BOTH HAVE HAIR
chevytheplayer 1 year ago
@chevytheplayer 1 must cover their head "WHILE PRAYING AND PROPHESYING" and the other must not is the correct reading. Now what to cover or not cover with while praying etc is another topic. Now its a sin for a man to have long hair(or let his hair grow long) in the 1st place whether hes praying etc or not, but the scripts never says that its a shame for a woman to have short hair.
hlywarrior 1 year ago
@hlywarrior
you said "Now what to cover or not cover with while praying etc is another topic. "
THAT IS THE ONLY TOPIC WERE TALKING ABOUT, there is only ONE head and the bible said she must have it COVERED meaning she must take action to have it COVERED
Look man, I know you want to believe your right cause a devil told you, that you were gonna be perfect, but your not making sense, for each verse you have a contradictory explanation that hurts your other arguments
HAVE YOU LEARNED NOTHING?
chevytheplayer 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@chevytheplayer Now when I said, "Now what to cover or not cover with while praying etc is another topic. " I was correcting what u said, "The bible is saying one must cover and one must not, YET THEY BOTH HAVE HAIR " by 1st letting u know that the bible was in fact emphasizing when one should or shouldnt cover their head which was "while praying or prophesying".
hlywarrior 1 year ago
@chevytheplayer I first distinguished between the topics of when one should or shouldnt be covered, with what one could or could not cover their heads with in general. A man can never cover his head with long hair regardless of when it is. Also,seeing that u cant answer my question, I guess that settles it once again with more witnesses to observe the debate. Some1 needs to step in and let u know to just stop, bc ur making urself look even more like a fool.
hlywarrior 1 year ago
@hlywarrior
there is a difference between not answering a question, and you not wanting to hear an answer, and you my lost friend just don't want to hear that answer
The bible doesn't say what material to cover the heads with, but he said you MUST cover your head not the hair already on your head but YOU must TAKE ACTION to COVER YOUR head
Oh and that "more witnesses need to step in" statement just proves you are tapping out... again, whats a matter can't handle ur own problems?
chevytheplayer 1 year ago
@chevytheplayer Another thing,If Im wrong bc a devil told me I was, then why r u so hardpressed to debate me?U should just let me b deceived if I wont recieve truth, right?R u doin this for pride, just to say u "crushed" some1?Ur fruit says that u love or are fond of quarrel and strife, which is the very def of being contentious.Notice"I crushed you", "I destroyed you with scripture", "Im calling your bluff", my point exactly.
hlywarrior 1 year ago
@hlywarrior
hly weren't you the one to ask why I was off topic, and how I was "not answering your quest" yet all of a sudden you are asking for someone to step in and end your suffering, and your telling me if I'm debating you cause of pride.
Last I checked, your the one that couldn't let a lose go, and decided to kick this "debate" up and I'm telling you the SAME thing I told you a year ago, while you come up with all kinds of new angles to make ur argument work
For shame unhly
chevytheplayer 1 year ago
@chevytheplayer Needless to say u wont answer my question, ull just babble on about other things to get out of answering. Thats why I cut guys like u off, bc ull just go deeper into more ungodliness like the script says.2 Ti2:16 "But shun profane and vain babblings: for they will increase unto more ungodliness."Ur just babbling.
hlywarrior 1 year ago
@hlywarrior
Babbling- to talk enthusiastically or excessively
Hmm who here types 5 paragraphs for one question?
Who here says they can't be deceived?
Who here says God told him he was gonna be perfect?
No son, I say the same thing as I said 9 months ago, my argument hasn't changed, but yours has at every step but it makes as much sense as the argument you made 9 months ago, its a shame how if you look back my words stay the same, and yours are TOTALLY different
chevytheplayer 1 year ago
@chevytheplayer Its only a sin for her to willingly shave or have her hair shaved(to scrape her hair off her head with a razor) or shorn( to cut off the hair[completely] from her head with shears) or cut with either utensil to the point that its no longer long(or hangs down the head; as a veil).
hlywarrior 1 year ago
@chevytheplayer Women who have cancer or has their hair cut low or off unwillingly have not sinned, but its still required for them to cover their head with something as a sign of submission to the authority over her while praying or prophesying so that it wont offend those who watch her pray etc.(1 Cor11:13"Judge in yourselves: is it comely that a woman pray unto God uncovered?"
hlywarrior 1 year ago
@hlywarrior
cancer??? seriously?
You do know the hair falling out is because of chemotherapy (radiation) so your hair falling out excuse just fell on its face.
Also the scripture said HAVING NO COVERING IS EQUAL TO BEING SHAVEN, according to you that means if she shaved her head willingly, why are you making up things as you go?
I stuck with my first argument, and you have to look for ways to dodge and ignore what is WRITTEN PLAINLY in the scriptures
chevytheplayer 1 year ago
@chevytheplayer Even when shes not praying etc around people she still has to be covered with something to not offend the angels which are encamped about her at all times, by rebelling against Gods orderof creation. 1Cor11:10"For this cause ought the woman to have power(a noticable sign of submission to her authority) on her head because of the angels."
hlywarrior 1 year ago
@chevytheplayer Thats why God gave her hair so that she could let it grow long and use it as a covering when praying or prophesying at any time. If u would just listen and respect Gods word u can be taught, but u cant see past Gino whos only a man.If im wrong u can never say that I didnt repent bc Ive already done that, thats how I got further truth.
hlywarrior 1 year ago
@hlywarrior
LOL, first off, what is coming out of your mouth isn't God's word
You type a message saying that went you prayed you heard a voice that said you would become "PERFECT" and you said God said that too you, well I'm here to say it wasn't God cause Moses, Job, Peter, Paul, NONE of the men of God in the scriptures were told they were gonna be "perfect" or become perfect
Thats probably why your acting like what you say is truth cause a devil deceived you LONG ago
chevytheplayer 1 year ago
@chevytheplayer Why r u goin off the subject?Will u answer my question or not?It was simple.
hlywarrior 1 year ago
@hlywarrior
also stop making paul sound like a hypocrite
He declared the law, then he said in verse 16
"But if any man seem to be CONTENTIOUS, we have no such custom, neither the churches of God"
WHAT DOES THAT WORD MEAN?
CONTENTIOUS-exhibiting an often perverse and wearisome tendency to quarrels and disputes
HMMM strange how you seem to have left out the first part of that verse, cause you know it kills your paul argument
Paul said don't debate it, cause he declared it
chevytheplayer 1 year ago
@chevytheplayer The only reason I left the first part out was to pretty much fit the comment on the page, u could look it up urself. Now, what did he mean by "if any man be contentious"? Why did he say this? Bc of those in that culture who was self rightous about keeping the laws of their land, which was that women should cover their heads while praying and prophesying etc with other means than their hair universally as Paul taught.
hlywarrior 1 year ago
@chevytheplayer They loved to fight against the revelation of the truth that Paul taught, that a womans hair was given to her to be a covering by God, which was against the traditions of the elders in that area even as uall do. So Paul reassured them that the doctrine that a woman ought to wear a certain type of veil (such as 1 thats man made) was not universal by saying in vs 16"We have no such custom, neither the churches of God."
hlywarrior 1 year ago
@hlywarrior
where did paul teach that? Paul plainly said if you don't have your head covered you dishonor yourself, AND its EQUAL to having your head shaven
So now Paul is declaring rules, and denouncing his own declaration? LOL
Also most women have long hair, yet they submit to NO Authority, so your argument fails AGAIN, the bible said a SIGN of authority not something that everyone naturally has, but something that must show she SUBMITS to authority
And its not hair
chevytheplayer 1 year ago
@chevytheplayer Thats what those gentiles in that area was contentious about the revelation of the God given covering.Quest, do u believe that God gave a woman her hair for a covering as Paul said, or not?
hlywarrior 1 year ago
@hlywarrior
Here is your answer AGAIN for ur "quest" (lol)
14Doth not even nature itself teach you, that, if a man have long hair, it is a shame unto him?
15But if a woman have long hair, it is a glory to her: for her hair is given her for a covering.
THERE the bible was talking about the natural, hence "Doth not even nature itself teach you..."
Not about praying or prophesying, but "Doth not even nature itself teach you"
Please man, you and your weak "quest"
chevytheplayer 1 year ago
@chevytheplayer
QUEST cont...
But here it says
4 "Every man praying or prophesying, having his head covered, dishonoureth his head"
5But every woman that prayeth or prophesieth with her head uncovered dishonoureth her head
THERE it was speaking about praying
Now you gonna tell me "oh no the greek translation said..."
Or "oh no the Lord is gonna be mad cause you don't believe my *truth*"
Stop jumping around from verse to verse with different explanations, I stuck to ONE argument since 09
chevytheplayer 1 year ago
@chevytheplayer Oh, and just for the record to answer ur reply " You do know the hair falling out is because of chemotherapy (radiation) so your hair falling out excuse just fell on its face." You do know that the cause of a person having to recieve chemotherapy is bc of cancer right?
hlywarrior 1 year ago
@hlywarrior
AGAIN I SAY, cancer doesn't effect the hair, CHEMOTHERAPY does, please do some learning cause it seems like your biblical and medical knowledge are inadequate, but your willingness to make up meanings, and come up with excuses are still in full swing
Question, did they have Chemotherapy in the days of Paul? If not what is the point of you even attempting to make this argument using bible?
chevytheplayer 1 year ago
@chevytheplayer So in fact the root cause of such a person loosing their hair, is bc of them having to get treatment for the cancer, so Im not exactly sure how that makes my argument fall on its face.
It was a 1+1=2 example.Anyways, Im done its not my fault u dont understand.
hlywarrior 1 year ago
@chevytheplayer BTW, u didnt answer my question flat out, u gave a passage of scripture without explaining the interpretation of the scriptures. It was a round about answer at best to avoid a direct answer, in an attempt to make it seem as though u answered it with scripture, FAIL. If u recall it was a yes or no question, "Do you believe that God gave women their hair for a covering like Paul taught in 1 Co11:15."My answer is YES. It was a simple yes or no but u couldnt even do that.
hlywarrior 1 year ago
@hlywarrior
out of all the people, YOU trying to tell me I typed too much in my answer??
hlywarrior you turn a simple one to two paragraph answer into 5 on every question asked.
Where not children, I mean do you not comprehend the answer? you need to go back to reading that dictionary?
hly your being embarrassed AGAIN, you had a year to get ready, and your getting made a fool of AGAIN, the only thing you got left is technicalitys??
chevytheplayer 1 year ago
@chevytheplayer I thoroghly explain my answers so that people like u can "GET IT", but obviously you dont. I dont run from questions, I meet them head on. Also I dont just answer a question in a round about way, I answer them straight up and not only do I stay on the surface, I go into depth so that my view can clearly be understood by the recipient,but thats not always the case.U could learn my brother acc to humanity,bc its not in Christ.
hlywarrior 1 year ago
@hlywarrior
So basically YOUR allowed to answer THOROUGHLY but I'm not?
Double standards anyone?
Also, like I said before who ever said you were gonna be perfect lied to you, cause it wasn't God. I know that for a fact especially after these "debates"
You know how many times your explanation has changed?? I notice you left the greek translations alone, cause it killed your argument
What you typed now is COMPLETELY different from 9 months ago, yet what I'm saying has STAYED THE SAME
chevytheplayer 1 year ago
@chevytheplayer What are u talking about?I have continued to use greek definitions throughout, what do I have to type in "In the greek it says"? Or the greek word is? Please! And when did I tell u that u typed in too much in ur answer? Double standard?
hlywarrior 1 year ago
@hlywarrior
hly point out on post you made with "greek translations" cause before you were typing these weird greek words like TEZKOS, but when Imheavenlyoperated cracked that code, you all of a sudden abandon that argument
No son you getting your word definition the same place your getting your scriptural explanations... from thin air
chevytheplayer 1 year ago
@chevytheplayer And concerning your babbling accusation and to help u understand the scripture in 2 Ti 2:16 a lil better, I would suggest u look at it a little closer. U said "hlywarrior you turn a simple one to two paragraph answer into 5 on every question asked."Paul never said any kind of babbling was to be shunned, if u look deeper he said it was "VAIN BABBLINGS" that should be avoided, for(in this context FOR means BECAUSE) they will increase unto more ungodliness."
hlywarrior 1 year ago
@hlywarrior
Look man you have to stop using the "in context" excuse cause for some reason you think "in context" means "insert words here to help argument"
I'm pretty sure thats not how it works
And yes, according to your definition, your words are vain cause they change like the wind, one day you say "Paul said only Corinth... then you say Paul said the law was not for the church..., and on.... and on.... and on but I STAY with the SAME points from 9 months ago till now
hly its been over
chevytheplayer 1 year ago
@chevytheplayer This is exactly what Im talking about when it comes to ur conversation, and I have to repent before all on here bc I lied. I said I was done with u and your dead debate but allowed u to provoke me to get involved with this foolishness. I should observe an old adage, which is to "never argue with a fool, bc people from a distance cannot tell which is which."That is exactly why Paul wrote that to Timothy, and now I understand why.
hlywarrior 1 year ago
@hlywarrior
You have to repent??
Didn't you tell me to show the folks where you "whipped" me on the PJ re-exposed comments???
Please don't even try to quote Paul, cause tomorrow you may say he didn't say it, the you'll say he did say it but only to Corinth, LOL same cycle
hly just go back into the shadows and wait for another "diss" video to be made on me so you can be the first to post, lol, cause making you jump from verse to verse changing your story is getting boring
chevytheplayer 1 year ago
@chevytheplayer God didnt give a woman her hair "in place(stead) of a covering bc her hair is a covering(anything that covers).So the reason I corrected myself was bc i wanted to be accurate in how I explained the doctrine to the best of my ability! Do me a favor and stop filling up this guys comments section trying to rehabilitate ur name by "challenging" me on a dead debate. Ur case has been closed and now u have just further exposed urself by trying to "expose" me.
hlywarrior 1 year ago
@chevytheplayer So no need to write back esp when this vid had nothing to do with u anyway but ur obviously still upset for being revealed as the fake that u are, and want to claim that u exposed some1 else but likewise was exposed.
hlywarrior 1 year ago
@hlywarrior
please man, what "substantial proof" did you have on me before TWOGC??
the only info you got was that I was sharper in the bible then you, and you were mad I made you look foolish, so please
Second the same people who made this vid made the vid on me, and they were both proven wrong but even after that you still said "no it must be chevy, I don't care if the info is wrong, IT MUST BE CHEVY"
hly I'm gonna warn the folk about you using those private messages u sent me
chevytheplayer 1 year ago
@chevytheplayer Uhhh ok, whatever ur talking about. Oh wait a minute ur talkin about those PM's that I sent u in that debate that we had that u took and twisted my words all out of context to try to discredit me and the truth I was speaking, like ur doin now, rriiiiggghhhhttttt!!!!
hlywarrior 1 year ago
@hlywarrior
twisting? Tell me when you said its IMPOSSIBLE for you to be deceived, did I twist what you said?
When you said that if I don't agree with what your saying I'm messing with a child of God and God will be angry if I don't give up my argument and admit your right, was that something I twisted?
please man, just make does "documents" you have public so we can all see what chevytheplayer said to hurt your feelings, I'm CALLING YOU OUT ON YOUR BLUFF
chevytheplayer 1 year ago
@chevytheplayer I know what ur talkin about now, no worry I still have those documents on file for any1 to look at as well so they can take the brain that God has blessed them with and come to a sound conclusion of who's actually tellin the truth or not, so go head and post dont talk about it only, ur so predictable with your desperation to try to clear ur tarnished name.
hlywarrior 1 year ago
@hlywarrior
tarnished name?
I haven't lost 1 subscriber, and my vids have gotten a combined 103,111 views so my reputation is fine
Its strange, Jesse was telling the truth, why wouldn't he allow me to post on that vid?
After I started posting some truth, all of a sudden OOOPs, chevy isn't allowed to post his comments anymore
You weren't speaking any truth, you just twisted scripture to fit your reality
chevytheplayer 1 year ago
@hlywarrior
no the vid has something to do with me cause the same person who slandered digital, slandered me
Look man, I know it must hurt being taken to school in scriptures by an "upstart" then after that the upstart starts a random youtube and gets over 100,000 views, while your still licking your wounds and jumping on ANYTHING that says anything bad about me no matter how foolish it sounds
face it man, you got left in the dust and now your a full time hater, LOL, its sad
chevytheplayer 1 year ago
@hlywarrior - Thank you.
BibleTranslator 1 year ago
Good job, sir. I'd be interested to see what these folks have to say now. If they don't repent and apologize, then like their own pastor says they will "lift their eyes up in hell". On a side note, you might want to check into getting your record expunged.
NotYourTypicalNegro 1 year ago
Wow!!!!!!!! you did it again I can see the EGG ALL OVER Tony's, Keith's, Kerry and Jessy's face. This is TYPICAL behavior of the Way Of God Church. (Cult)
mysupermansmile 1 year ago 2
@mysupermansmile - Thanks, my sister. I got another one coming. The next one will rip the mask off of Tony's face. If TWOGC can't see who their pastor is after this one, Yahuwah is gonna do it.
digitalflava 1 year ago
@digitalflava Don't worry about what kerry or any of those fools say about you, they are just jealous because you had the courage to stand and walk out of that cult. So expect anything from a bunch of weaklings and confused misfits. In the end let us pray for "Kerry the wife Beater"
jollysincere 1 year ago
@mysupermansmile He really is nailing them to the cross! every attempt blows up in their phony faces.If nothing else, this shows "ALL" just how Holy these fakes are, what Saved Man or woman would resort to blatant LIES?? the ones like Kerry,Keith,Jessy, & of course their beloved LEADER<<<TONY SMITH! thats the kind.
jollysincere 1 year ago
@mysupermansmile - this young man has a powerful minstry. He has a laid down life for the THE MOST HIGH. His mother I am sure is powerful to, as well as his father I'am sure. THE MASTER, was in jail to for things done in good. To the small little boys, that don't know how to fight in the army of the MOST HIGH, you need to let one of the women lead in your church maybe, just maybe.lol.
1thebloodofjesus 1 year ago
@1thebloodofjesus - Thank you.
digitalflava 1 year ago
20 thumbs up.
You took off the gloves on this one. LOL
I felt like I was in a court room watching a trail. LOL
You put these false accusers to shame in this series.
RINGO4LIFE 1 year ago 7
@RINGO4LIFE - Thanks, RINGO!! The next one will hit them the hardest.
digitalflava 1 year ago
@digitalflava
Oh, so you got more. LOL
I thought video 3 was the last video.
RINGO4LIFE 1 year ago 4
@RINGO4LIFE - Yeah, part 3 was the last part. When I said "The Next One....", I meant that I have another video apart from this one. A different video, different title.
digitalflava 1 year ago