@loveyrocks not true, he could not save the Kaurava brothers from Bhima during the 14th day, although he eventually defeated Bhima that day, the victory was not exactly complete, Bhima had single handedly wreaked havoc deep in Kaurava territory, despite Drona, Karna, Kritvarma and others trying their utmost, although I agree that Bhima and Karna and Drona were the most consummate warriors during the war, capable in using ALL weapons
thats your interpretation and u r entitled to it. what I think is kunti ma begged for the lives of pandavas. From that point of view it is clear that Karan Was the mightiest of all. And of course u cant deny the fact that Karan was the greater archer than arjun. It was Lord shri Krishna's will that he (Lord Krishna) did not wanted Karan to enter the battlefield because he feared death for arjun and the circumstances happened so bhisma did not want karan under his commandership.
Krishna also told arjuna that it is the time u can kill him when Karan was not in his chariot. lord krishna said to arjun if u could not kill him now u will never ever can kill him. Arjun killed Karan deceitfully u know that.
Krishna also told arjuna that it is the time u can kill him when Karan was not in his chariot. lord krishna said to arjun if u could not kill him now u will never ever can kill him. Arjun killed Karan deceitfully u know that. hare krishna
It was solar eclipse that actually happened and proved astronomically too..it happened around 3067 BC (included in research, finding the authenticity of this great Epic!!
HIDU RELIGION HAS LONGEST TRACE BACK IN HSTORY OUR CALANDER-VIKRAM SAAMVAT IS AHEAD OF BRITISH CALANDER AND IF SOMEONE HAS DOUBT WATCH *THE ORIGIN* ON DISCOVERY EPISODE ON 21ST JUNE 2007 BUT ALWAYS REMEMBER WE WERE WE ARE AND WE WILL BE COZ WE RESPECT ALL
ALL MY HINDU BROTHERS JUST REMEMBER ONE THING GOD IS ONE WEATHER KRISHNA OR ALLAH OR JEGES DONT MATTER WHAT ANY ONE SAY BUT PLEASE WE WONT DISRESPECT ANY RELIGION COZ I SEE MY LORD SHIVA IN MANDIR ,MASJID AND CHURCH EVERYWHERE
krishna changed the laws of nature for his dear freind Arjun...this just tells me that Krishna Bhagawaan could do the same for me....i only have to surrender unto him and be his undiverted and strong associate......Yeah, it is possible!
Arjuna was far from being the best warrior, because:
(1) An ordinary warrior (Susharma) kept Arjuna engaged for two DAYS - indirectly causing Abhimanyu's death.
(2) Krishna tells Arjuna that he can't kill Karna in fair battle - so he exhorts him to kill Karna when he was helpless, even though Karna had spared him just the day before.
(3) Arjuna's son Babruvahana killed Arjuna easily in battle.
(4) Arjuna was helpless against even ordinary thieves, when they were looting Dwaraka.
@VS sHarmaPUNJABi---- don't show u're intellectual level by using the language that u have done so proficiently here...
u claim to do a 1000 pieces of dushasan and duryodhan for humiliating a women but women keep getting humiliated all over India everyday by people way worse & evil than these "so called villains" of Mahabharat,
And as far as I know , punjabis are amongst first to humiliate a women ...just take a look around.
How abt u do smthin abt tht before abusing ppl u dn't knw about.
Just one word for all sitting there.... Bhenchod.................. A brave person can take a bullet or sword in his chest to save the chastity of a women.... What brave azzwholes were these... lol... these all were just bhenchods and bhen ke lodde.... I would have done 1000 pieces of dhushasan or dhuriodhan .... Azzwholes
Dear Blessed Soul, Please listen to Yatharth Geeta OR Bhagavad Gita, never has Bhagavad Gita been explained so clearly and in so much in depth. It is hence called "Yatharthgeeta, you can download the mp3 of your choice of language from the website yatharthgeeta. com OR search for 'yatharthgeeta' right here on youtube OR go to youtube. com/user/foryatharthgeeta to get a quick preview. God Bless You!
When they were swordfighting, the other hand was not used. A second sword int he second hand would have been effective. For all their claims of expertise, these people are amateurs.
i am tired of hearing from people that if we read mahabharat then we will end up fighting. this is totally wrong,please do not compare mahabharat with todays business quarrels between brothers for CEO post. mahabharat was fought for dharma,god(krishna)himself asked arjun to fight. even the battlefield kurukshetra is called dharmakshetra. we are all supposed to study it well and learn from it,if we don't, then probably we will end up fighting.
Yep. I always used to think that he was doing that voice to sound like an Indian version of Arnold Schwarzenegger. But nevertheless, I think Parveen Kumar Sobti is the best Bhima actor!
In Episode 53, he also pronounced "kshama" as "kashama", when he encounters a brahmana family who was about to be Ghatotkacha's offering to the family goddess.
Arjun sees that Krishna caused the apparent sunset, but doesn't question Him. He just accepts it. He was ready to accept defeat if that's what Krishna wanted. Wow! I salute his belief in Krishna!
@aparaajita10: Well then, I think the belief is totally wrong. The Mahabharat is highly intellectual, just that we have a habit of misinterpreting it grossly, and the various incidents have lost their real meaning when subjected to foolisspeculation. And, besides, since Mahabharat has got Krishna in it, it is holier than anything else.
@ThePelikan93 I think I did not use the right words, u see, it's difficult in writing. I totally agree with you. I (personally) hold Mahabharat in higher esteem than Ramayan. I was only speaking in the lighter vein, making an observation at the war of words triggered on youtube. But then every mention of the word Hindu does that these days. People feel it very safe to bash anything Hindu, and for obvious reasons.
@aparaajita10: Sry if I got u wrong. But even I'm sick of how ppl bash everything that's really Hindu and really sensible and go behind these fake babas and gurujis who claim to b God, get cheated, and then that comes out, and ppl say Hinduism is stupid!!!!!! We want the easier way out everywhere, but calling a living man God is just the height of it all. Anyways, the comments-Mahabharat never seems to cease, just increases with every episode. :)
@ThePelikan93 Many of the times it is the conmen who are posing as babas who lure the people. Those include the christian missionaries who pose as godmen. & missionaries. That is coz people are too lazy 2 lrn about them & fall for the getup & rhetoric. The one targeted are the real ones. The people should take time to learn about it & no blame Hindu dharm. No where does it require u to do that. Hindu Dharm is the only one that tells u that u don't need a middleman to communicate with God.
@ThePelikan93 They have disregarded our own heritage of all the seemingly simple stories that have great lessons & guidelines to avoid such pitfalls, & have started wasting much of their time on useless stories like the ones advertised by the west, for their entertainment. This problem of conmen posing as godmen is rampent in christianity & islam too, but no one bashes them, since it is their time for fame now.
I think what we all should keep in mind is when the Mahabharat was finally written down from the Oral tradition, it was explained in the simplest terms that could be understood. The Divya astras that are described are of enormous power. They were comparable to ICBMs that are held by the World's great militaries today.
@manojgarg8419 How modern, just the way today's criminals are hijacking the history...by denying the existece of & changing the definition & parameters of greatness & nobility...that is "modernization"
karna was the strongest out of all of them. he promised not to kill any of his brothers. even lord krishna told arjun that karna was the son of the sun god and he would be pretty much impossible to defeat!
about other things pandavas did... bhishma had a curse upon him by the woman he had insulted earlier, amba hence his death at shikandi, who was amba reborn to seek vengence on him, was bound to happen when arjuna used shikandi as a shield to fend off bhisma. about drona, he had unfairly assisted the kauravs in killing abhimanyu hence krishna asked arjun to return him the favor by faking his son ashwatthams death.
the pandavas did not cheat in any way in the mahabharata war. all they did was to adhere to the fine principles of dharma. jayadhrata's father was a greedy sage who wished for an impossible boon to make his son immortal. krishna found the right opportunity to achieve two goals in the same time - kill jayadhrata and rid his fathers impossible boon and at the same time let Arjuna achieve his promise...
@ nimageofmine - you must have gotten lost somewhere. You really need to start the show from the begining for you to think that arjun and lord krishna did not follow the rules..
think - who broke the rules first but before that where did the jealousy start? Commenting on something u see is easy for following and understanding the reason behind it is all together and different story!!!
then i say you need to rewatch the whole mahabharat because i don't think you get the point of the whole story...Pandavas did follow the dharma and rules and so did lord krishna !!! you can't just watch the whole thing as a show...you gotta watch and think at the same time...
dude, this was cheating...just to kill Jaydraath, Lord Krishna himself had to play tactics...atleast I am not convinced. Whatever shown here is incorrect. Also, Arjuna himself din't fallow rules of fighting 1:1. damn it, this cannot be true. If it is true, then, there is no difference between pandavas and kauravas, where pandavas claim that they follow dharma nd rules.
This was not cheating, there was an eclipse of which krishna was aware and others were not and got befooled...anyway abhimanyu was also cheated to death
@mkgrpd I agree, Krishna caused the eclipse...........and Krishna and Arjun had to so-called "cheat" (not follow the rules) since the other side cheated first.
Since they cheated first, it would be unwise for the pandavs to have the rules hold them back....since, in this situation, the other side was already cheating......
@mkgrpd lessee, hmm... Jayadratha had kept his weapons down and was not looking (read the book, the serial does take poetic license), also wasn't the Bhishma put down unfairly before the killing of Abhimanyu, during this day Bhurishravas was also put down unfairly, even Bhagdatta killing is kinda sketchy
I am not trying to go for any particular side here, but do not measure the beauty of our epics by tiny morality plays, this tale is far, far greater than that, it is about Dharma, not morality
@nimage, You are totally right. It was trickery by Krishn. The MahaB teaches us that you have to do the right thing, but also be cleaver and slick. This world is not for the simpleton, I guess that's the message here...
violated daan dharma ...haha so thats why ppl called him DANVEER karan in the whole mahabharat n till now from the history.Cunning indra asking for kawaj n kundal of the immortal guy was a noble thing to do right??????N he did not told lie because he did not knew he was kshatriya at that time..
karna first of all violated law of daan dharma by asking a shakti astra in return of his kavach & kundal, karna knew his kavach kundal could protect him from divya astras of arjun, but he had no astra which could kill arjun as he was well aware of parshurams curse which will make him forget all mantras when he needed it.
as regards to being cursed by parshurama. he told a lie to parshurama that he was a brahmin & cheated his guru & learnt art of archery from him. so ...it had to happen.
This partly explains some of the tricks used by Krishna. As reagrds the much-hyped armour and ear rings given to Karna by Surya, they were not more powerful than Pashupat astra given by Rudra which had never come back without destroying the target and was the most potent weapon in the universe. Moreover, Karna was given Bajra by Indra in exchange of these things. Moreover, what type of warrier was Karna? After getting defeated by Abhimanyu, he killed him along with six other warriers
yo einstein karna was not given the vrajra he was given the shakti which could only be used once. Indra promised any weapon except the Vrajra learn your facts before calling Karna a poor warrior
As regards the Mahabharat war, Arjun delared that he won't use any divya astra, which made the lives of warriers like Karna easier. So while others used divya astra against him, Arjun did not use them aginst rivals only to prove his archery skills. Had Arjun used weapons given to him by Lord Shiva and others, no warrier would have survived and the war would have been finished in a moment. The Lord wanted him not to use as all noted warriers were supposed to be accorded some grace before death.
Arjuna did use divya astras using the brhamastra is a divya astra so again you are wrong. He spent 3 years alone in the forests to gain these weapons in order to use it against drona bheeshma and karna with his diya astra arjun was able to place jayadraths head in his fathers lap so agin wrong
Arjuna did not use brahmastra. when ashwathama fired it, he had to use it to block it, else the world would have been lost.And he retrieved it when Lord Brahma asked him to. He did not fire divyastra's to win or prove his skills.
that was after the war, arjun used many divya astras that is why he actually went and did penance for it. IF you believe that he did not use divya astras then please go read an accurate usmmary of the mahabharat war. that my friends is the STUPIDEST thing i have heard
devineel....seems u need to go and study the book the mahabharata or the gita.....arjun used the divyastra only to kill karna as the other astras were no good to kill karna.....he used it only after lord krishna coaxed him to .....he used the VARKASTRA to kill jaydratha and did nt feel the need to use the divyastra to kill jayedratha as he was not the son of the sun like karna was.....so pls he went into penance for somethin else which again is a long story...
I agree with u tirthankar102. In fact, in Karna's case also, though he used a divyastra, Arjun did not use Brahmastra, pashupat astra or other similar very destructive divine weapons. Had it been the case, Karna would have been killed before he actually died. Moreover, Arjun did not go for penance bcoz he used divya astras in Mahabharat war. In fact, it is the STUPIDEST thing ever said.
Devineel, it's true that Karan was given shakti astra but Arjun never used very destructive divine weapons in Mahabharat, otherwise he would have killed Karan the day he surfaced on the battle field. Karan was over-confident bcoz he knew Arjun would not apply them against him and he could use shakti astra against Arjun and kill him. Had Arjun used such weapons, Ghotatkoch need not have been killed to make Karan spare his shakti astra bcoz Arjun had all these weapons. So read mahabharat again.
@netajismart, I have heard the story that Krishna did not allow a Arjuna-Karna confrontation as long as Karna had the Shakti.
Bheeshma and Drona were fighting unwillingly. So the only person who could have defeated the Pandavas was Karna, by (a) killing Arjuna with the Shakti, or (b) killing Arjuna when he was trapped, or (c) imprisoning Yudhishtra when he had the chance.
So Krishna made Kunti get her promises from Karna - to spare the Pandavas in more ways than one, which he generously did.
no one knows the mahabharata more than i do pal..its nt my overconfidence but what i ve read from the gita and the mahabharata.......have you ever visited kurukshetra.....well i ve done and once u do it too your doubts will be cleared that even brahmastra could nt kill karn.....it was only after he gave his kavacch and kundals to lord indra that his death was possible.......and let me tell you that karn did fire the pashupat astra at arjun once he was the senapati but arjun survived.......
well done dulles. You are a person of great and pure Buddhi. I totally agree with you. And that was my defense too in many of the debates that I participated in.
"The Lord wanted him not to use as all noted warriers were supposed to be accorded some grace before death."
I think this is a great point of yours. Indeed, the lord wanted to give eternal fame to all the great warriors such as Bheeshm, Drona and Karna. More over, destiny is also part of it. Like Shikandi should become part of Bhishma's death, Drishtadhyumn should kill Drona etc. and Karna's curses make the difference in the end.
On the contrary, both Drupad and Gandharv king were duly defeated by Arjun. He also defeated Karna many times in direct war (remember Draupadi's marriage and Virat war episodes apart from others). To say that Karna was just unconscious during virat war and not defeated is hillarious. The fact that he could not defend himself against Sammohan astra is testimony to the fact that he was defeated. Moreover, unlike Arjun, Karna has fled from the battle field after geting defeated a number of times.
Dear Karna lovers, get your facts right and base your arguments on facts not assumptions. Arjun was the greatest archer-- a fact endorsed by Lord Krishna Himself a number of times and duly acknowledged by greatest warriors of that time like Bhisma and Drona. You will never hear any of them saying (in words) karna was the greatest. Moreover, remember that Karna was defeated even by a king like Drupad and also Gandhrav king who made Duryodhan a prisoner even when Karna was not subjected to curses
3. Indra begging the armor and earrings. Karna had the combined qualities of all 5 Pandavas, being the eldest of them, and was always loyal and gave anyone, anything they asked. .
4. Krishna disarms him by informing him about the pandavas being his brother. This caused his hatred for the pandavas to be destroyed, and its said that afterwards, his love for the pandavas rivaled that of Bheeshmas to them. Yet he kept fighting just like Bheeshma, to fulfil his duty.
@ashish4360, that sounds very reasonable. Karna's greatest misery in life was that he was believed to be a suta-putra, i.e., of low birth. By informing him that he was not only born in a good family, but was actually the eldest of the virtuous Pandavas, Krishna and Kunti robbed him of his all hatred towards the Pandavas. Karna also came to realise, that the Pandavas were righteous, and so deserved to win.
In the end, he was likely only fighting for the sake of duty, not because he hoped to win.
And at last, even with all the above 6, none of them, even Arjun could kill Karna. Yet Karna with the curses and the knowledge that hes fighting his brothers, was capable of killing all of them. He spared all save Arjun, and Arjun could not defeat him except by cheating somehow..on the next episode u will see karan would have killed arjun thrice.
Karan was cheated no less than 6 times in his lifefor this particular battle.
1. The curse of Parashuram, thinking Karna was a Kshatriya since he was a mortal enemy of kshatriyas. Karna at this time didnt know he was a kshatriya. This curse was a blessing for Arjuna, protecting him.
2. The curse of the brahman, as a result of accidentally killing his cow. Though an accident, he recieved the curse of the chariot sinking in the field, once again, a blessing for Arjuna, protecting him.
In virat war karan was just made unconscious but not defeated.The word defeated could only be used when the opponents surrenders or gets killed.But neither of that happened.Even arjun had hit him with an arrow after making unconscious he would not have killed because Karan was immortal and invincible against all celestial weapons with the armor and earrings that were part of his body.
For the one who tries to put down karna.....Lord Krishna himself said that in whole Mahabharat only Bheesm and Karn were the two who would have truly followed the Teaching of Gita.There are many more things about Karna, but I dontt think you are here to discuss truth. It seems you all will always hear and continue with the same misinterpreted information that you earn.
Hello everyone, I have a question for you all. Excuse my cultural ignorance concerning India, biy why do your write comments in englisg if this version os not subtitled? You obviouslu speak hindi, so why write in english?
with his kavach and kundal no one could have killed karan.........if what u are saying is right than why didn't arjun wail for karan to get back on the rath......................
if thats what u are saying then there is no point arguing with you since your knowledge is very limited.................go read mahabharat from google or any other reliable source
this is not BR chopra 's imagination ......karna was not on his rath ...............check any other source and next time please don't make stupid statements without any credible knowledge
once again u have shown your ignorance here ..................u have no idea what you talking about....................so please go and review what u read years ago
you are one of the biggest losers to call it "fiction"!! it is historical and many aspects are beyond the comprehension of the normal human mind!! get real! loser!
That is what Ati-rathi means he can take as many raths as he wants. This is exactly the logic Shri Krishna gives Arjuna when Karna clambers down to pull the wheel of the ground. Karna was an ati-rathi too and could have taken another rath if he wanted. Once he learns that he can't invoke Brahmastra, he is defeated mentally. The ratha thing was an excuse.
It is true but Indra also blessed him with one use of the vajra - I guess the real lesson is that a person blindly following somebody who follows the track of ADHARAMA, can't be trusted with weapons that have been created for the benefit of mankind. They will be taken away by the devas.
It was really hilarious to see him falling from chariot after chariot and crashing to the earth like an uprooted tree - you would think he would learn to jump off gracefully after the first one or two chariots were shattered by Bhima.
i can't understand why Karna and drona didn't interfere when Abhimanyu was murdered so brutally. And draupadi is so stubborn, she can never see her fault, had she not taunted Duryodhan by calling him "a blind man's blind son" and insulted Karan by calling him a Sootputra there wouldn't have been so much bitterness.
Not a single pandwa can beat him. He is best. That's why lord Kirsha , and Kunti force him to go against Arjun only. Because Arjun is leaded by Lord Krishana.. Karan has got all ability of all 5 brothers and he is better from them. Just it's bound to happens for Karna to kill all wrong person on this earth on that time.. He is key person in mahabharat.
It was not a question of killing a newly married Brahmana. Watch the episode, Arjuna cuts his Bow.
Again watch the Viraat war episode, Karna knew it was Arjuna because he challenges him to a battle but Karna was no match for him. Arjuna had rendered Karna & a host of other warriors unconscious. He could have killed all of them except for Bhisma, Drona & Ashvathama, if he wanted.
Regarding curse of Parshurama, likewise the vajra too was given to him because of blessing of Indra.
you considered karna as a adharmi.well so called dharmaraj yudhistir tell lie to viraat king about his identity,if you read the true story lying at the battle field karna give his golden teeth to indra after defeat by arjun.indra came at the identity of a brahmin.Parshuram's curse was meaningless.arjun killed karna by adharma.who said that what pandavs do is dharma and opponent do is adharma.
arjun defeat bhisma by adharma and then karna and other killed avimanyu .
First off, Karna was a follower of Adharma hence an adharmi. It was because of his support that Duryodhana considered himself invincible. There are many times when Duryodhana says so. Also, you are glossing over transgressions by the Kauravas - how many times they tried to kill the pandavas & take away what really belonged to them.
If we move the mahabharat to todays setting - Duryodhana would have been prosecuted as a juvenile delinquent for trying to kill Bhima when he was small. Dhritrashtra would have been prosecuted for stealing what was not rightly his. Duryodhana & co. would be prosecuted for Arson & conspiracy to kill Pandavas by burning them and yada yada. The Mahabharat war wouldn't have happend because all these guys will be in jail.
The episode doesn't convey everything clearly as it is not possible. According to VedVyas Mahabharath, Karna and Arjuna had a long fight after the Swayamvar and Karna got defeated. Whether he knew Arjuna or not is irrelevant as any good warrior should offer the same quality of fight whomsoever the opponent maybe. I don't mean to demean Karna, but he did lose
@karthige79, Arjuna and Karna were in an all-out battle, and in such a battle victory is not a matter of skill in archery alone, but also depends on who has the better armour and more potent weapons.
Arjuna had divyastras, but as Indra himself admits, Karna had the armour to defeat every last one of them. In the actual battle, Karna had the use of Nagastra, but had promised to Kunti that he would use it only once.
Karna promised to Kunti that he would not use the Nagastra more than one.
@SamSungSamSung9999: I agree that armour, divyaastras & archery skills determine the winner. But, Karna's armour can only prevent his trunk(excluding hands & head) from being harmed. If the Astra can destroy the armour then the kundals will redirect it on the person who shot the Astra. Karna could never be killed in battle by fair means - I can never disagree with that.
But, he was defeated by Arjuna after Draupadi's swayamvar & in Virat war. He was also defeated by the Gandharvas
@karthige79, fair points, but Karna's kavacha was said to be made of amruta - nectar - which meant that he simply could not be killed (by any weapon in any way whatsoever) while he had that kavacha on.
As the story goes, Karna was a rakshasa called Sahasrakavacha in his previous birth, who had a 1000 kavachas made of amruta around him. Lord Narayana and Nara rishi worked together to cut off 999 of these kavachas, then were reborn as Krishna and Arjuna to complete the job in his birth as Karna.
@SamSungSamSung9999: Controversy surrounding the Nagaastra. There is no clear indication on how Karna obtained it and some versions do not contain Karna's promise to Kunti on using the Nagaastra only once. Even otherwise, a warrior like Karna would not use the same astra twice on the same opponent. This is mentioned in some of the versions of the Mahabharath. But, it is undisputed that if not for Krishna, the Nagaastra would have sent Arjuna's head rolling on the battlefield
@karthige79, yes, different sources do vary, when it comes to the fine details. But I have read that Karna had obtained the Naagaastra as a gift from the Nagas, many of whom perished in the fire when Arjuna burnt the Khandava forest to clear it. The Nagas expected Karna to kill Arjuna with it.
When Karna fired the Naagaastra, a Naga was to guide the missile to its target. Having missed once, the Naga begged Karna to fire the missile again, but Karna, mindful of his promise to Kunti, didn't.
yup, in the actual book, as Bhima is killing the 100 kaurava brothers one after another duryodhan sends Karna 4 times to intervene, everytime Bhima defeats Karna soundly and doesnt kill him due to Arjun's vow to kill karna. Its only after when Bhima is already severly wounded and is already chariot-less after destroying two whole kaurava-elephant-armies that this incident happens.
they say that it was solar eclipse that took place during this war, which misleaded to be sunset. the timing of the mahabharat war can also be counted by this.
Watch again at 36th min. Its Krishna who tricks everyone by covering the Sun by clouds. This fooled everyone to think the day is over. Had he not done that Arjun would have most probably taken Samadhi. To believe its a Solar eclipse is to live in denial. What I fail to understand is that custodians of Dharma break the rules of war every now and then in Mahabharata. I have no respect for any of them - Yudhisthir etal or Duryodhan etal.
solar eclipse is not caused by clouds....if u think it was a solar eclipse just because u couldn't see the sun.. then we would have solar eclipse every day when it rains heavily..get ur facts straight boy
at wich time is one of the gada dented?
MyLalinea 6 days ago
Comment removed
dharmendraprasad17 2 weeks ago
during the fight with bheem one of the gada got dented
qaz010wsx 1 month ago
karna kicks ass with mace too..WOOHOO!!
ripples28 2 months ago
please jayadratha stop laughing like a rabid hyena!! 36:43
SadguruKaDaas 3 months ago
at 36:30 is when Bhangra dance got invented in this world!
carolinaindian 6 months ago
Praveen kumar (bheem) is by far the worst actor ever! On the contrary, Puneet Issar (Duryodhan) and Nitesh (Krishna) are the best!
carolinaindian 6 months ago
karna's might is overemphasized. Given all his talents he was bound to fail as he was on the wrong of morality.
SubramaniyanArun 6 months ago
Karan Is greater than all Kauravs pandavs . karan can defeat all single handedly. No bheem or arjun can kill him.
loveyrocks 6 months ago
@loveyrocks not true, he could not save the Kaurava brothers from Bhima during the 14th day, although he eventually defeated Bhima that day, the victory was not exactly complete, Bhima had single handedly wreaked havoc deep in Kaurava territory, despite Drona, Karna, Kritvarma and others trying their utmost, although I agree that Bhima and Karna and Drona were the most consummate warriors during the war, capable in using ALL weapons
ankitait2 6 months ago 2
@ankitait2
thats your interpretation and u r entitled to it. what I think is kunti ma begged for the lives of pandavas. From that point of view it is clear that Karan Was the mightiest of all. And of course u cant deny the fact that Karan was the greater archer than arjun. It was Lord shri Krishna's will that he (Lord Krishna) did not wanted Karan to enter the battlefield because he feared death for arjun and the circumstances happened so bhisma did not want karan under his commandership.
loveyrocks 6 months ago
@ankitait2
Krishna also told arjuna that it is the time u can kill him when Karan was not in his chariot. lord krishna said to arjun if u could not kill him now u will never ever can kill him. Arjun killed Karan deceitfully u know that.
loveyrocks 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@ankitait2
Krishna also told arjuna that it is the time u can kill him when Karan was not in his chariot. lord krishna said to arjun if u could not kill him now u will never ever can kill him. Arjun killed Karan deceitfully u know that. hare krishna
loveyrocks 6 months ago
wish I had someone like Krishna by my side
prashnew1983 6 months ago
I hate Gajendra Chauhan, he is the lone weak actor in the whole series..
pratyushrathore 6 months ago
Comment removed
pratyushrathore 6 months ago
It was solar eclipse that actually happened and proved astronomically too..it happened around 3067 BC (included in research, finding the authenticity of this great Epic!!
ankushzap 7 months ago 5
jai shree krishna.....
29anubhav 7 months ago
is pankaj dheer left handed?
MyLalinea 8 months ago
HIDU RELIGION HAS LONGEST TRACE BACK IN HSTORY OUR CALANDER-VIKRAM SAAMVAT IS AHEAD OF BRITISH CALANDER AND IF SOMEONE HAS DOUBT WATCH *THE ORIGIN* ON DISCOVERY EPISODE ON 21ST JUNE 2007 BUT ALWAYS REMEMBER WE WERE WE ARE AND WE WILL BE COZ WE RESPECT ALL
GOD IS IN EVERY HUMANS HEART *NAMAASTE*
sunooona 8 months ago 9
ALL MY HINDU BROTHERS JUST REMEMBER ONE THING GOD IS ONE WEATHER KRISHNA OR ALLAH OR JEGES DONT MATTER WHAT ANY ONE SAY BUT PLEASE WE WONT DISRESPECT ANY RELIGION COZ I SEE MY LORD SHIVA IN MANDIR ,MASJID AND CHURCH EVERYWHERE
sunooona 8 months ago 2
Rules of engagement....there are few countries that have adopted them and abide by...except Iraq,Iran,Pakistan,Libya....
0nman 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Guys I've found one link of Mahabharat part 2 i mean the history after the war.
bwtorrents(dot)com/threads/272 686-Mahabharat-Katha-Part-2-(4 5-avi-files)-B(dot)R(dot)Chopra
mit3inn 1 year ago
krishna changed the laws of nature for his dear freind Arjun...this just tells me that Krishna Bhagawaan could do the same for me....i only have to surrender unto him and be his undiverted and strong associate......Yeah, it is possible!
tanvee28 1 year ago
@tanvee28 ... No offence dear! But Krishna Ji did NOT change laws of nature for His dear FRIEND ARJUN.
He changed them for DHARMA.
radhatalwar 7 months ago
@radhatalwar hmm...i guess you are right :) that needed some pondering but ultimately what u say is true :)
tanvee28 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@tanvee28 ... No offence dear! But Krishna Ji did NOT change laws of nature for His dear FRIEND ARJUN.
He changed them for DHARMA.
radhatalwar 7 months ago
Karna aka sadashivrao bhau is left handed :-)
thirstyladka 1 year ago
I just love Bhim's fights....real punch :-)
livingpiano 1 year ago
@SamSungSamSung9999 u r wrong as Susharma didnt engaged Arjun but more the time he was running away frm him...
ankushzap 1 year ago
Arjuna was far from being the best warrior, because:
(1) An ordinary warrior (Susharma) kept Arjuna engaged for two DAYS - indirectly causing Abhimanyu's death.
(2) Krishna tells Arjuna that he can't kill Karna in fair battle - so he exhorts him to kill Karna when he was helpless, even though Karna had spared him just the day before.
(3) Arjuna's son Babruvahana killed Arjuna easily in battle.
(4) Arjuna was helpless against even ordinary thieves, when they were looting Dwaraka.
SamSungSamSung9999 1 year ago
@VS sHarmaPUNJABi---- don't show u're intellectual level by using the language that u have done so proficiently here...
u claim to do a 1000 pieces of dushasan and duryodhan for humiliating a women but women keep getting humiliated all over India everyday by people way worse & evil than these "so called villains" of Mahabharat,
And as far as I know , punjabis are amongst first to humiliate a women ...just take a look around.
How abt u do smthin abt tht before abusing ppl u dn't knw about.
axl8 1 year ago
Just one word for all sitting there.... Bhenchod.................. A brave person can take a bullet or sword in his chest to save the chastity of a women.... What brave azzwholes were these... lol... these all were just bhenchods and bhen ke lodde.... I would have done 1000 pieces of dhushasan or dhuriodhan .... Azzwholes
VSharmaPunjabi 1 year ago
Dear Blessed Soul, Please listen to Yatharth Geeta OR Bhagavad Gita, never has Bhagavad Gita been explained so clearly and in so much in depth. It is hence called "Yatharthgeeta, you can download the mp3 of your choice of language from the website yatharthgeeta. com OR search for 'yatharthgeeta' right here on youtube OR go to youtube. com/user/foryatharthgeeta to get a quick preview. God Bless You!
foryatharthgeeta 1 year ago
It was an eclipse ...
rajeevrp 1 year ago
good job satyiki !! kya mast teer chalaye dana-dan :)
shanu7uday 1 year ago 2
Karna defeated Bhima and let him live . Yay, way to go Karna !!! You were THE BEST !!!
chandran900 1 year ago
@chandran900 Same ws done by Prithvi Raj Chauhan (who hailed from clan of Janmejay-son of Parikshit) to Mohammed Gazni when latter pleaded for mercy.
Moral of story- never leave ur enemy ;)
shanu7uday 1 year ago 2
When they were swordfighting, the other hand was not used. A second sword int he second hand would have been effective. For all their claims of expertise, these people are amateurs.
kmg4 1 year ago
wow that part where jaydrath's head lands on his fathers lap and his father is like ahhh and then his head booms!!!!! lol :)
computerhelper303 1 year ago
Dhrithrashtra is sooo pathetic slimy.
Lol .. !!!
Chikmangloor 1 year ago
i am tired of hearing from people that if we read mahabharat then we will end up fighting. this is totally wrong,please do not compare mahabharat with todays business quarrels between brothers for CEO post. mahabharat was fought for dharma,god(krishna)himself asked arjun to fight. even the battlefield kurukshetra is called dharmakshetra. we are all supposed to study it well and learn from it,if we don't, then probably we will end up fighting.
prixyz5 1 year ago 2
its true dude ur correct.they fail to understand the inner beauty & artistic way in which it has been made.
nsundu123 1 year ago
LOL love Bhima's accent. Arjan! 13:18
vedicger108 1 year ago 2
@vedicger108 .. heh .. he is Punjabi .. so his Hindi has got a bit of that Punjabi flair
leobindaas 1 year ago
Yep. I always used to think that he was doing that voice to sound like an Indian version of Arnold Schwarzenegger. But nevertheless, I think Parveen Kumar Sobti is the best Bhima actor!
In Episode 53, he also pronounced "kshama" as "kashama", when he encounters a brahmana family who was about to be Ghatotkacha's offering to the family goddess.
vedicger108 1 year ago
Arjun sees that Krishna caused the apparent sunset, but doesn't question Him. He just accepts it. He was ready to accept defeat if that's what Krishna wanted. Wow! I salute his belief in Krishna!
ThePelikan93 1 year ago
Wow! There is MahaBharat in the video and a war in the comments area. No offence, but just saying...:)
ThePelikan93 1 year ago
@ThePelikan93 Bingo! You got it. That's why according to Hindu beliefs, no one should keep or read Mahabharat, for it causes fighting
aparaajita10 1 year ago
@aparaajita10: Well then, I think the belief is totally wrong. The Mahabharat is highly intellectual, just that we have a habit of misinterpreting it grossly, and the various incidents have lost their real meaning when subjected to foolisspeculation. And, besides, since Mahabharat has got Krishna in it, it is holier than anything else.
ThePelikan93 1 year ago
@ThePelikan93 I think I did not use the right words, u see, it's difficult in writing. I totally agree with you. I (personally) hold Mahabharat in higher esteem than Ramayan. I was only speaking in the lighter vein, making an observation at the war of words triggered on youtube. But then every mention of the word Hindu does that these days. People feel it very safe to bash anything Hindu, and for obvious reasons.
aparaajita10 1 year ago
@aparaajita10: Sry if I got u wrong. But even I'm sick of how ppl bash everything that's really Hindu and really sensible and go behind these fake babas and gurujis who claim to b God, get cheated, and then that comes out, and ppl say Hinduism is stupid!!!!!! We want the easier way out everywhere, but calling a living man God is just the height of it all. Anyways, the comments-Mahabharat never seems to cease, just increases with every episode. :)
ThePelikan93 1 year ago
@ThePelikan93 Many of the times it is the conmen who are posing as babas who lure the people. Those include the christian missionaries who pose as godmen. & missionaries. That is coz people are too lazy 2 lrn about them & fall for the getup & rhetoric. The one targeted are the real ones. The people should take time to learn about it & no blame Hindu dharm. No where does it require u to do that. Hindu Dharm is the only one that tells u that u don't need a middleman to communicate with God.
aparaajita10 1 year ago
@ThePelikan93 They have disregarded our own heritage of all the seemingly simple stories that have great lessons & guidelines to avoid such pitfalls, & have started wasting much of their time on useless stories like the ones advertised by the west, for their entertainment. This problem of conmen posing as godmen is rampent in christianity & islam too, but no one bashes them, since it is their time for fame now.
aparaajita10 1 year ago
I think what we all should keep in mind is when the Mahabharat was finally written down from the Oral tradition, it was explained in the simplest terms that could be understood. The Divya astras that are described are of enormous power. They were comparable to ICBMs that are held by the World's great militaries today.
doctorshovelbumm 1 year ago 2
Bhai jo jit gaya vo dharm ke saath hain, history bhi to unke hi raaj mai likhi gayi hain.
manojgarg8419 2 years ago
@manojgarg8419 How modern, just the way today's criminals are hijacking the history...by denying the existece of & changing the definition & parameters of greatness & nobility...that is "modernization"
aparaajita10 1 year ago
karna was the strongest out of all of them. he promised not to kill any of his brothers. even lord krishna told arjun that karna was the son of the sun god and he would be pretty much impossible to defeat!
k99physco99s 2 years ago
good use of a bonbori by Karna there
kanchadie 2 years ago
sanjay says bhim has forced dron to retrieve
dullesfarm 2 years ago
about other things pandavas did... bhishma had a curse upon him by the woman he had insulted earlier, amba hence his death at shikandi, who was amba reborn to seek vengence on him, was bound to happen when arjuna used shikandi as a shield to fend off bhisma. about drona, he had unfairly assisted the kauravs in killing abhimanyu hence krishna asked arjun to return him the favor by faking his son ashwatthams death.
sesshy34 2 years ago 4
bhishma never insulted amba
tirthankar102 2 years ago
disagree, if u see in the way of Amba, then Bishma did mistake, which one was not acceptable...
vetmksharani 1 year ago
the pandavas did not cheat in any way in the mahabharata war. all they did was to adhere to the fine principles of dharma. jayadhrata's father was a greedy sage who wished for an impossible boon to make his son immortal. krishna found the right opportunity to achieve two goals in the same time - kill jayadhrata and rid his fathers impossible boon and at the same time let Arjuna achieve his promise...
sesshy34 2 years ago 4
@ nimageofmine - you must have gotten lost somewhere. You really need to start the show from the begining for you to think that arjun and lord krishna did not follow the rules..
think - who broke the rules first but before that where did the jealousy start? Commenting on something u see is easy for following and understanding the reason behind it is all together and different story!!!
jpatel010 2 years ago 2
then i say you need to rewatch the whole mahabharat because i don't think you get the point of the whole story...Pandavas did follow the dharma and rules and so did lord krishna !!! you can't just watch the whole thing as a show...you gotta watch and think at the same time...
dippatel0007 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
dude, this was cheating...just to kill Jaydraath, Lord Krishna himself had to play tactics...atleast I am not convinced. Whatever shown here is incorrect. Also, Arjuna himself din't fallow rules of fighting 1:1. damn it, this cannot be true. If it is true, then, there is no difference between pandavas and kauravas, where pandavas claim that they follow dharma nd rules.
nimageofmine 2 years ago
This was not cheating, there was an eclipse of which krishna was aware and others were not and got befooled...anyway abhimanyu was also cheated to death
mkgrpd 2 years ago 13
@mkgrpd I agree, Krishna caused the eclipse...........and Krishna and Arjun had to so-called "cheat" (not follow the rules) since the other side cheated first.
Since they cheated first, it would be unwise for the pandavs to have the rules hold them back....since, in this situation, the other side was already cheating......
Bottom Line: What Krishna did was fair game !!
LK56835 1 year ago
@mkgrpd regardless, the rule said untill sun is up in the sky, "sun is still up in the sky" during eclipse, its just hidden under moon
ajoshi06 9 months ago
@mkgrpd lessee, hmm... Jayadratha had kept his weapons down and was not looking (read the book, the serial does take poetic license), also wasn't the Bhishma put down unfairly before the killing of Abhimanyu, during this day Bhurishravas was also put down unfairly, even Bhagdatta killing is kinda sketchy
I am not trying to go for any particular side here, but do not measure the beauty of our epics by tiny morality plays, this tale is far, far greater than that, it is about Dharma, not morality
ankitait2 6 months ago
@nimage, You are totally right. It was trickery by Krishn. The MahaB teaches us that you have to do the right thing, but also be cleaver and slick. This world is not for the simpleton, I guess that's the message here...
dirtyharree 2 years ago 2
Comment removed
nimageofmine 2 years ago
on the final battle u will see karan would have killed arjun thrice.He got killed because he was not fighting with arjun but lord krishna himself
snoopblunt 2 years ago
violated daan dharma ...haha so thats why ppl called him DANVEER karan in the whole mahabharat n till now from the history.Cunning indra asking for kawaj n kundal of the immortal guy was a noble thing to do right??????N he did not told lie because he did not knew he was kshatriya at that time..
snoopblunt 2 years ago
Comment removed
murligenius 2 years ago
karna first of all violated law of daan dharma by asking a shakti astra in return of his kavach & kundal, karna knew his kavach kundal could protect him from divya astras of arjun, but he had no astra which could kill arjun as he was well aware of parshurams curse which will make him forget all mantras when he needed it.
as regards to being cursed by parshurama. he told a lie to parshurama that he was a brahmin & cheated his guru & learnt art of archery from him. so ...it had to happen.
murligenius 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
land behenchod jo bhi mu peh aye bol deve..kya tune mahabharat ka yudha dekha hai jo arjun ki itni taarif kar raha hai..land madharchod
realmantra12 2 years ago
This partly explains some of the tricks used by Krishna. As reagrds the much-hyped armour and ear rings given to Karna by Surya, they were not more powerful than Pashupat astra given by Rudra which had never come back without destroying the target and was the most potent weapon in the universe. Moreover, Karna was given Bajra by Indra in exchange of these things. Moreover, what type of warrier was Karna? After getting defeated by Abhimanyu, he killed him along with six other warriers
netajismart 2 years ago 2
yo einstein karna was not given the vrajra he was given the shakti which could only be used once. Indra promised any weapon except the Vrajra learn your facts before calling Karna a poor warrior
DEVINEEL 2 years ago
As regards the Mahabharat war, Arjun delared that he won't use any divya astra, which made the lives of warriers like Karna easier. So while others used divya astra against him, Arjun did not use them aginst rivals only to prove his archery skills. Had Arjun used weapons given to him by Lord Shiva and others, no warrier would have survived and the war would have been finished in a moment. The Lord wanted him not to use as all noted warriers were supposed to be accorded some grace before death.
netajismart 2 years ago
Arjuna did use divya astras using the brhamastra is a divya astra so again you are wrong. He spent 3 years alone in the forests to gain these weapons in order to use it against drona bheeshma and karna with his diya astra arjun was able to place jayadraths head in his fathers lap so agin wrong
DEVINEEL 2 years ago
Arjuna did not use brahmastra. when ashwathama fired it, he had to use it to block it, else the world would have been lost.And he retrieved it when Lord Brahma asked him to. He did not fire divyastra's to win or prove his skills.
dullesfarm 2 years ago 16
that was after the war, arjun used many divya astras that is why he actually went and did penance for it. IF you believe that he did not use divya astras then please go read an accurate usmmary of the mahabharat war. that my friends is the STUPIDEST thing i have heard
DEVINEEL 2 years ago
devineel....seems u need to go and study the book the mahabharata or the gita.....arjun used the divyastra only to kill karna as the other astras were no good to kill karna.....he used it only after lord krishna coaxed him to .....he used the VARKASTRA to kill jaydratha and did nt feel the need to use the divyastra to kill jayedratha as he was not the son of the sun like karna was.....so pls he went into penance for somethin else which again is a long story...
tirthankar102 2 years ago 2
I agree with u tirthankar102. In fact, in Karna's case also, though he used a divyastra, Arjun did not use Brahmastra, pashupat astra or other similar very destructive divine weapons. Had it been the case, Karna would have been killed before he actually died. Moreover, Arjun did not go for penance bcoz he used divya astras in Mahabharat war. In fact, it is the STUPIDEST thing ever said.
netajismart 1 year ago
correct.....arjun neva went into penace for using the divyastras it was for some other reason.....
tirthankar102 1 year ago
Devineel, it's true that Karan was given shakti astra but Arjun never used very destructive divine weapons in Mahabharat, otherwise he would have killed Karan the day he surfaced on the battle field. Karan was over-confident bcoz he knew Arjun would not apply them against him and he could use shakti astra against Arjun and kill him. Had Arjun used such weapons, Ghotatkoch need not have been killed to make Karan spare his shakti astra bcoz Arjun had all these weapons. So read mahabharat again.
netajismart 1 year ago
@netajismart, I have heard the story that Krishna did not allow a Arjuna-Karna confrontation as long as Karna had the Shakti.
Bheeshma and Drona were fighting unwillingly. So the only person who could have defeated the Pandavas was Karna, by (a) killing Arjuna with the Shakti, or (b) killing Arjuna when he was trapped, or (c) imprisoning Yudhishtra when he had the chance.
So Krishna made Kunti get her promises from Karna - to spare the Pandavas in more ways than one, which he generously did.
SamSungSamSung9999 1 year ago
seems that u had to eat ur own words mite......its u who said that arjuna went into penace for using the divya astras...
tirthankar102 1 year ago
no one knows the mahabharata more than i do pal..its nt my overconfidence but what i ve read from the gita and the mahabharata.......have you ever visited kurukshetra.....well i ve done and once u do it too your doubts will be cleared that even brahmastra could nt kill karn.....it was only after he gave his kavacch and kundals to lord indra that his death was possible.......and let me tell you that karn did fire the pashupat astra at arjun once he was the senapati but arjun survived.......
tirthankar102 1 year ago
@dullesfarm
Arjuna use one brahmastra to kill karn
yasminmansury 1 year ago
@yasminmansury it was anjalika
pujasur09 1 year ago
Does Mahabharata or Ramayana talk of Atala and their vailixi? If not, which literature does? Vedas? Puranas? Upanishads?
AlienshateU 1 year ago
@dullesfarm
well done dulles. You are a person of great and pure Buddhi. I totally agree with you. And that was my defense too in many of the debates that I participated in.
solusindica89 10 months ago
"The Lord wanted him not to use as all noted warriers were supposed to be accorded some grace before death."
I think this is a great point of yours. Indeed, the lord wanted to give eternal fame to all the great warriors such as Bheeshm, Drona and Karna. More over, destiny is also part of it. Like Shikandi should become part of Bhishma's death, Drishtadhyumn should kill Drona etc. and Karna's curses make the difference in the end.
Amazing point indeed.....
esrujan 2 years ago
On the contrary, both Drupad and Gandharv king were duly defeated by Arjun. He also defeated Karna many times in direct war (remember Draupadi's marriage and Virat war episodes apart from others). To say that Karna was just unconscious during virat war and not defeated is hillarious. The fact that he could not defend himself against Sammohan astra is testimony to the fact that he was defeated. Moreover, unlike Arjun, Karna has fled from the battle field after geting defeated a number of times.
netajismart 2 years ago 2
Dear Karna lovers, get your facts right and base your arguments on facts not assumptions. Arjun was the greatest archer-- a fact endorsed by Lord Krishna Himself a number of times and duly acknowledged by greatest warriors of that time like Bhisma and Drona. You will never hear any of them saying (in words) karna was the greatest. Moreover, remember that Karna was defeated even by a king like Drupad and also Gandhrav king who made Duryodhan a prisoner even when Karna was not subjected to curses
netajismart 2 years ago
5. Kunti disarms him and safeguards her 4 sons, by the boon given by Karna that he would not kill any of them except Arjun.
ashish4360 2 years ago
Karan was cheated like 6 times in his life for this battle.
6.Using Ghatotkach to steal Karnas shakti gained from Indra to protect Arjuna. Khadotkajs duty was fulfilled and Arjun was saved
ashish4360 2 years ago 2
3. Indra begging the armor and earrings. Karna had the combined qualities of all 5 Pandavas, being the eldest of them, and was always loyal and gave anyone, anything they asked. .
4. Krishna disarms him by informing him about the pandavas being his brother. This caused his hatred for the pandavas to be destroyed, and its said that afterwards, his love for the pandavas rivaled that of Bheeshmas to them. Yet he kept fighting just like Bheeshma, to fulfil his duty.
ashish4360 2 years ago
@ashish4360, that sounds very reasonable. Karna's greatest misery in life was that he was believed to be a suta-putra, i.e., of low birth. By informing him that he was not only born in a good family, but was actually the eldest of the virtuous Pandavas, Krishna and Kunti robbed him of his all hatred towards the Pandavas. Karna also came to realise, that the Pandavas were righteous, and so deserved to win.
In the end, he was likely only fighting for the sake of duty, not because he hoped to win.
SamSungSamSung9999 1 year ago
And at last, even with all the above 6, none of them, even Arjun could kill Karna. Yet Karna with the curses and the knowledge that hes fighting his brothers, was capable of killing all of them. He spared all save Arjun, and Arjun could not defeat him except by cheating somehow..on the next episode u will see karan would have killed arjun thrice.
ashish4360 2 years ago
Karan was cheated no less than 6 times in his lifefor this particular battle.
1. The curse of Parashuram, thinking Karna was a Kshatriya since he was a mortal enemy of kshatriyas. Karna at this time didnt know he was a kshatriya. This curse was a blessing for Arjuna, protecting him.
2. The curse of the brahman, as a result of accidentally killing his cow. Though an accident, he recieved the curse of the chariot sinking in the field, once again, a blessing for Arjuna, protecting him.
snoopblunt 2 years ago
In virat war karan was just made unconscious but not defeated.The word defeated could only be used when the opponents surrenders or gets killed.But neither of that happened.Even arjun had hit him with an arrow after making unconscious he would not have killed because Karan was immortal and invincible against all celestial weapons with the armor and earrings that were part of his body.
snoopblunt 2 years ago
For the one who tries to put down karna.....Lord Krishna himself said that in whole Mahabharat only Bheesm and Karn were the two who would have truly followed the Teaching of Gita.There are many more things about Karna, but I dontt think you are here to discuss truth. It seems you all will always hear and continue with the same misinterpreted information that you earn.
snoopblunt 2 years ago
Hello everyone, I have a question for you all. Excuse my cultural ignorance concerning India, biy why do your write comments in englisg if this version os not subtitled? You obviouslu speak hindi, so why write in english?
GiselleKan 2 years ago
lol,
sanjay = vidhur, maharaj dhridrastra is not happy with both.
utubekhiladi 2 years ago 3
lol yeaaaaa
Akshayphadke 2 years ago
Both Mahatma Sanjay and MahaGyani Vidhur were True Well Wishers of DhrtRashtr. But, He was Blinded By His Desire
humbleRaj 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Yudhishir was a fool
tunebrain 2 years ago
Dristadyumn was a type of dog who only know how to bark and nothing else.
sgupta850 2 years ago
Comment removed
shreekushkadakia 2 years ago
Comment removed
shreekushkadakia 2 years ago 2
well said, Mahabharata is a very true story!
hcpspilakarb 2 years ago
Comment removed
shreekushkadakia 2 years ago
with his kavach and kundal no one could have killed karan.........if what u are saying is right than why didn't arjun wail for karan to get back on the rath......................
gaurav15984 2 years ago
Comment removed
shreekushkadakia 2 years ago 2
if thats what u are saying then there is no point arguing with you since your knowledge is very limited.................go read mahabharat from google or any other reliable source
gaurav15984 2 years ago
this is not BR chopra 's imagination ......karna was not on his rath ...............check any other source and next time please don't make stupid statements without any credible knowledge
gaurav15984 2 years ago 2
Comment removed
shreekushkadakia 2 years ago 2
once again u have shown your ignorance here ..................u have no idea what you talking about....................so please go and review what u read years ago
gaurav15984 2 years ago
Comment removed
shreekushkadakia 2 years ago
Comment removed
shreekushkadakia 2 years ago
as mahabharat is a vast epic, there are many small changes in the story, from place to place, from author to author.
well wikipedia can help you get a good knowledge about this
luckykingkong 2 years ago
my sincere aplologies to you and your interpretation.
The version we saw on TV and is available in english is THE REFINED version.
The real sanskrit version or say the old versions clearly mention about it.
so the issue for debate is nonexistent.
thanks
and my apologies for being bit harsh with you
:)
cameo747 2 years ago
GET YOUR BRAIN some TONIC!
the female HAD complete right to select and reject a person even if conditions were met like Karna breaking the bow.
Got that clear in YOUR BRAIN
READ HISTORY AND PURANAS AND MAHABHARAT IN DETAIL before JUMPING ON A TRAIN :D
cameo747 2 years ago
you are one of the biggest losers to call it "fiction"!! it is historical and many aspects are beyond the comprehension of the normal human mind!! get real! loser!
carolinaindian 2 years ago
i completely agree with you, i mean there is no way anyone can make up a story that is so intricate and teach so many moral lessons
symptl 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
mahabharata is completely mythological and a great work of fiction by veda vyasa
it give many good teachings
Magarmach09 2 years ago
YOUR BRAIN IS LIKE A PEANUT!
cameo747 2 years ago
lol how many chariots does Drona have
chilln04 2 years ago
That is what Ati-rathi means he can take as many raths as he wants. This is exactly the logic Shri Krishna gives Arjuna when Karna clambers down to pull the wheel of the ground. Karna was an ati-rathi too and could have taken another rath if he wanted. Once he learns that he can't invoke Brahmastra, he is defeated mentally. The ratha thing was an excuse.
r8rdarklord 2 years ago 2
Indra make a trick.he took tje armour of karna.arjun could not kill karna with the armour.
AyatullahAsif 2 years ago
It is true but Indra also blessed him with one use of the vajra - I guess the real lesson is that a person blindly following somebody who follows the track of ADHARAMA, can't be trusted with weapons that have been created for the benefit of mankind. They will be taken away by the devas.
r8rdarklord 2 years ago
@chilln04, about 200, I think. :-))
It was really hilarious to see him falling from chariot after chariot and crashing to the earth like an uprooted tree - you would think he would learn to jump off gracefully after the first one or two chariots were shattered by Bhima.
SamSungSamSung9999 1 year ago
Kaurav sainiks also dancing along :) LOL FUNNY @36:56
jamwithashish 2 years ago 3
i can't understand why Karna and drona didn't interfere when Abhimanyu was murdered so brutally. And draupadi is so stubborn, she can never see her fault, had she not taunted Duryodhan by calling him "a blind man's blind son" and insulted Karan by calling him a Sootputra there wouldn't have been so much bitterness.
nehauitbu 2 years ago
Balwaan bhim gets defeated by daan veer karna the expert wariior. excellent!!!
anilvinjamur1973 2 years ago 2
Not a single pandwa can beat him. He is best. That's why lord Kirsha , and Kunti force him to go against Arjun only. Because Arjun is leaded by Lord Krishana.. Karan has got all ability of all 5 brothers and he is better from them. Just it's bound to happens for Karna to kill all wrong person on this earth on that time.. He is key person in mahabharat.
rabbitwithcam 2 years ago
Karna was no match for Arjuna..he beat him every time they faced.
- Beat him in Draupadi swayamvar.
- Beat him in Viraat yudh
- Beat him in the main battlefield.
r8rdarklord 2 years ago 2
The reaso was
-Karna was not ready and he did not intend to kill a newly marriage brahmin
-karna will not use his final weapon to defeat Viraat.He kept it for Arjun.He donnot know that it was Arjun fighting with him at viraat.
-Due to the curse of Parshuram.That was not his fault.
AyatullahAsif 2 years ago
It was not a question of killing a newly married Brahmana. Watch the episode, Arjuna cuts his Bow.
Again watch the Viraat war episode, Karna knew it was Arjuna because he challenges him to a battle but Karna was no match for him. Arjuna had rendered Karna & a host of other warriors unconscious. He could have killed all of them except for Bhisma, Drona & Ashvathama, if he wanted.
Regarding curse of Parshurama, likewise the vajra too was given to him because of blessing of Indra.
r8rdarklord 2 years ago
watch the episode.karna was not ready.who will be ready to fight a newly married brahmin.
AyatullahAsif 2 years ago
Assuming that what you say is true because it was not a war like setting. What about the Viraat war ?
r8rdarklord 2 years ago
you considered karna as a adharmi.well so called dharmaraj yudhistir tell lie to viraat king about his identity,if you read the true story lying at the battle field karna give his golden teeth to indra after defeat by arjun.indra came at the identity of a brahmin.Parshuram's curse was meaningless.arjun killed karna by adharma.who said that what pandavs do is dharma and opponent do is adharma.
arjun defeat bhisma by adharma and then karna and other killed avimanyu .
AyatullahAsif 2 years ago
First off, Karna was a follower of Adharma hence an adharmi. It was because of his support that Duryodhana considered himself invincible. There are many times when Duryodhana says so. Also, you are glossing over transgressions by the Kauravas - how many times they tried to kill the pandavas & take away what really belonged to them.
r8rdarklord 2 years ago 2
If we move the mahabharat to todays setting - Duryodhana would have been prosecuted as a juvenile delinquent for trying to kill Bhima when he was small. Dhritrashtra would have been prosecuted for stealing what was not rightly his. Duryodhana & co. would be prosecuted for Arson & conspiracy to kill Pandavas by burning them and yada yada. The Mahabharat war wouldn't have happend because all these guys will be in jail.
r8rdarklord 2 years ago
Comment removed
shreekushkadakia 2 years ago
It was "Shakti" that was given to Karna, not Varja buddy. It was the same "Shakti" that Indrajeet used to kill Lakshmana.
karthige79 2 years ago
The episode doesn't convey everything clearly as it is not possible. According to VedVyas Mahabharath, Karna and Arjuna had a long fight after the Swayamvar and Karna got defeated. Whether he knew Arjuna or not is irrelevant as any good warrior should offer the same quality of fight whomsoever the opponent maybe. I don't mean to demean Karna, but he did lose
karthige79 2 years ago
@karthige79, Arjuna and Karna were in an all-out battle, and in such a battle victory is not a matter of skill in archery alone, but also depends on who has the better armour and more potent weapons.
Arjuna had divyastras, but as Indra himself admits, Karna had the armour to defeat every last one of them. In the actual battle, Karna had the use of Nagastra, but had promised to Kunti that he would use it only once.
Karna promised to Kunti that he would not use the Nagastra more than one.
SamSungSamSung9999 1 year ago
@SamSungSamSung9999: I agree that armour, divyaastras & archery skills determine the winner. But, Karna's armour can only prevent his trunk(excluding hands & head) from being harmed. If the Astra can destroy the armour then the kundals will redirect it on the person who shot the Astra. Karna could never be killed in battle by fair means - I can never disagree with that.
But, he was defeated by Arjuna after Draupadi's swayamvar & in Virat war. He was also defeated by the Gandharvas
karthige79 1 year ago
@karthige79, fair points, but Karna's kavacha was said to be made of amruta - nectar - which meant that he simply could not be killed (by any weapon in any way whatsoever) while he had that kavacha on.
As the story goes, Karna was a rakshasa called Sahasrakavacha in his previous birth, who had a 1000 kavachas made of amruta around him. Lord Narayana and Nara rishi worked together to cut off 999 of these kavachas, then were reborn as Krishna and Arjuna to complete the job in his birth as Karna.
SamSungSamSung9999 1 year ago
@SamSungSamSung9999: Controversy surrounding the Nagaastra. There is no clear indication on how Karna obtained it and some versions do not contain Karna's promise to Kunti on using the Nagaastra only once. Even otherwise, a warrior like Karna would not use the same astra twice on the same opponent. This is mentioned in some of the versions of the Mahabharath. But, it is undisputed that if not for Krishna, the Nagaastra would have sent Arjuna's head rolling on the battlefield
karthige79 1 year ago
@karthige79, yes, different sources do vary, when it comes to the fine details. But I have read that Karna had obtained the Naagaastra as a gift from the Nagas, many of whom perished in the fire when Arjuna burnt the Khandava forest to clear it. The Nagas expected Karna to kill Arjuna with it.
When Karna fired the Naagaastra, a Naga was to guide the missile to its target. Having missed once, the Naga begged Karna to fire the missile again, but Karna, mindful of his promise to Kunti, didn't.
SamSungSamSung9999 1 year ago
thats in the tv series, in the actual book, bheem beat karna 4 times before karna finallly got upper hand
lotiq 2 years ago
BR Chopra seems to be a fan of character Karna and appears to have modified some acts to present Karna as better warrior etc.
esrujan 2 years ago
yup, in the actual book, as Bhima is killing the 100 kaurava brothers one after another duryodhan sends Karna 4 times to intervene, everytime Bhima defeats Karna soundly and doesnt kill him due to Arjun's vow to kill karna. Its only after when Bhima is already severly wounded and is already chariot-less after destroying two whole kaurava-elephant-armies that this incident happens.
lotiq 2 years ago
those were the days man. awesome. Om Sai Ram!
sidtemple 2 years ago
me too
debomondal 2 years ago
i am watching mahabharat 4 the 1st time i must say its enlightening and i like bhim the best from all the brothers
nutter2106 2 years ago
i liked the fighting between karna and bhim the best out of all the fights in this serial
sdaddy7260 2 years ago
thanks a ton rajshri i m really happy that you tried keeping our hindu sanskriti alive .. i enjoyed watching this episode keep doing the good work..
plklp01 3 years ago 2
Brings back memories!!!
hyabusa999 3 years ago
they say that it was solar eclipse that took place during this war, which misleaded to be sunset. the timing of the mahabharat war can also be counted by this.
pavanigmc 3 years ago 3
That was not a solar eclipse. That was a trick by Krishna.
arvindsdarwin 3 years ago 5
yes u r right, actually it was heavy cloud tht covered the sun make it like its sun set,
binayraj 3 years ago
That was a Solar Eclipse !!
GreenCheese500 2 years ago
Watch again at 36th min. Its Krishna who tricks everyone by covering the Sun by clouds. This fooled everyone to think the day is over. Had he not done that Arjun would have most probably taken Samadhi. To believe its a Solar eclipse is to live in denial. What I fail to understand is that custodians of Dharma break the rules of war every now and then in Mahabharata. I have no respect for any of them - Yudhisthir etal or Duryodhan etal.
arvindsdarwin 2 years ago
solar eclipse is not caused by clouds....if u think it was a solar eclipse just because u couldn't see the sun.. then we would have solar eclipse every day when it rains heavily..get ur facts straight boy
casinodon 2 years ago
Karna spares Bhim.
mukarung 3 years ago 8
i don't know how much i should thank you for uploading this videos...thanks my friend...
krishna40217 3 years ago 8