Added: 4 years ago
From: kiwismx5
Views: 977,469
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (2,920)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • No man, I read a lot. You must do the same. Just kidding. Only a question. Do you know what´s power projection?

  • russian tanks from the T54/55 onwards were designed for midgets to minimize weight and siluotte, the idea is that crew should be max 1,65 meters tall. A 1.80 meters tall soldier wouldn't fit inside.

  • @LostSpider

    The height restriction applies primarily for the drivers position, the other positions are not so heavily restricted.

  • the brazilian army need some of t-90.... russian army is the best of the world

  • From the museum of history. Piece of antic crap.

  • @joannawie

    Actually a relatively new design in comparison.

  • Прочитал треть комментариев... устал. Ребята, один вопрос: а почему АК-47 самый распространенный автомат в мире? А потому что он БЕЗОТКАЗНЫЙ. И способен стрелять в любых условиях. И эта концепция применима к любому нашему вооружению. Оно должно стрелять при любых условиях. И не глохнуть со своими турбо-винтовыми двигателями (как абрамс к примеру) в условиях пустыни. Кстати на те испытания т-90 единственный(!) из образцов дошел своим ходом (700км). Остальных привезли...

  • @OttoDrakula Подскажи,плиз,ссылку тех испытаний(желательно видео)если есть...

  • @OttoDrakula Т-80 и не 700км а 1,500

  • Leopard 2A7 : is the best !!!

  • Impresionante, pero ante un proyectil HEAT de un tanque probado en combate, como el M1A2 Abrams o el FV4034 Challenger 2, solo una enorme proyección de fuerza inclinaría la balanza hacia el T-90, pero Rusia no tiene dicha capacidad.

  • @MrCocorrea You are playing to much BF3

  • which is a shame is that this tank is a combination of two older tanks, the T72 and T80, the biggest flaw is its system of armortissement identical to the U.S. abrams, the torsion bars , reliable system but not the top, the Leclerc is it equipped with an oleo-pneumatic last generation, just look at the canon of the Leclerc driving on off-road, there is always pointed at the target! not not take it wrong, it's just a thought!

  • 0:27 из танка мусор выбросили?

  • @Artemalido Probably Shell Casings.

  • @kiwismx5 да те гильз

    yes those are shell casings

  • @Artemalido угу, бутылки пустые, испытывать танк на трезвую голову - не по-русски как-то...

  • @Artemalido лишние детали

  • Cheesy music and what is with the wolves interspersed throughout the video?! Crazy. Cool tank though.

  • @MarathonTheGame Different strokes for Different Folks, but to be honest I got it from a Russian Web Site over 4 years ago

  • @MarathonTheGame OK fair enough about the sound track, but what's with the wolves?! Rhetorical no need to answer. ;)

  • @MarathonTheGame they are comparing the tanks capabliteis to the wolf. like when the wolf kills its prey the T-90 takes out a tank ect.

  • Раньше на этом видео была другая музяка вроде....

  • god fucking dammit i can only wish i was at the forefront of tank engineering

  • МУЗЫКА - ГОВНО! МОГЛИ БЫ И ПО ЛУЧШЕ ПОДОБРАТЬ

  • @MrAipot I don't give a ГОВНО! if you don't like the music because the original soundtrack was really ГОВНО! anyway.

  • @kiwismx5 sorry, I do not mean to offend you

  • @MrAipot Нет проблем спасибо. :-)

  • @kiwismx5 вы же из Новой Зеландии. Откуда знаете русский язык? или пользовались переводчиком?

  • this comrades, is russian porn

  • yes but compare to new 2011 T-90MS !

  • помойму волки здесь лишние!!

    

  • abrams shit they fear t 90

  • Apple iTank: CONS: -White tank with no other choice of color -You have to recharge battery every 6 days in it -If it freezes you have to call Apple support and wait -You cant cooperate with other tanks because it has its own frequence that cannot be changed -If you break the glass scope you have to buy whole new tank -It has its own Apple iFuel -You have to wear Apple iHelmet to operate it PROS: -Its an Apple iTank! -You can operate it with your Apple iPhone!
  • Average russian piece of shit steel .......another target practice for the US tankers .

    Russians should already learn how to produce finally some serious tank not their cheap ass piece of shit "tanks" .

  • @ViciousCritique

    I hope you are aware that the US Army and the German Bundeswehr tested the (old version) armour of the T90 themselves.

    It could NOT be penetrated in any case.

    Have fun when dealing with a tank which you can not destroy ;)

  • @natsplit Nice fairy tale :)

  • @ViciousCritique

    no fairy involved. google for Kontakt-5 or Relikt reactive armour.

  • бойтесь суки, это вам не ваш гавноабрамс

  • @sarriusSS Translation: Fear the bitch, this is not your Abrams.

  • @kiwismx5 Actually the translation is "Fear, bitches, that's not you shitty Abrams for you" :)

  • @sarriusSS Абрамс уже давно сняли с производства...

  • @Dacvacerss Да лан ! А какой у них сейчас основной танк ?

  • @TheATheme

    Производство танков Абрамс прекращено в 1993 году. После этого только модернизировали.

  • @TheATheme Никакого... Танковая индустрия постепенно уходит в прошлое. Сейчас развитые страны военный бюджет в развитие уже других технологий вкладывают. Как по мне так ближайшее будущее за ракетными войсками, но это ИМХО. А по поводу М1А1 (А2) и М1, да они его делают, но только на экспорт.

  • IN SOVIET RUSSIA,THE TANK DRIVES YOU

  • Good tank, stupid music.

  • russia announced the developmentn of new super tanks.named as t99 and t95 65 tons.beeing able to hit target at range of 10 km using a missile and a new shell that is designing as we speak in a range of 6km.those r the specifications.gonna spend 7 billion euros and will get 5000.russia now has 14000 tanks but active r only 7000.still using some t72 which will be upgrade also.new tanks will be available of 2018 till 2035 with bmp3.adopted heavy editions like west giving atention to armor first

  • It's nice that they found a cost effective way to upgrade their T-72/80 series, but unless they devise some means of intercepting incoming rounds the T-90 will just be scattered across the field like all it's predecessors. Low profiles and high ground speed are not protection against ATGMs, ground radar, or kinetic penetrators. And not all missiles will be confused by their countermeasures.

  • @Lukos0036

    T90 is equipped with nadika, which is basically a radar stealth thing like on airplanes which make it invisible for radar (ground radar or radar of apachee longlow e.g.). Also the new era can withstand most western ATGMS since it can deflect tandem chargers. Only russia uses tripple tandem charges which would be able to destroy the t90. kinetic penetrators are also proven to be not effective against k5/relikt. russian era is the only which is able to defeat APFSDS at the moment.

  • i owned one of these, can't say i would get another in a hurry...

    hopeless on gas, hard to park, very little room for child seats

  • mass!!!animal!!!!

  • Finally, nealry 90% of all the idiots of Iraq died like rats from air. All that was left were mostly Republican guard divisions, who had something from the Iran-Iraq war.

  • Also, what if a heat does pierce the turret? Ammunition will go off. With only a few ATGMs, bad ballistics, bad fire control and unable to catch up in ballistics, T-90 is all but useless up close. It's also 90s era equipment. Not all the best. It has the advantage of a more-ranged ATGM - Besides that? Screwed. Also, Iraq had T-72M1s (which are upgraded to A standards due to the M1 kit VS the M.) Secondly, Iraq had trained crews from the Iraq Iran war (Not that I say these were "the best.")

  • Abrams has superior fire control, ballistics and in many places, better armor that is still classified. T-90 needs add ons, reactive armor and has laser guided ATMGs at a range of 6km. Why? Because when this tank fires its ATGMs, it can have time to run away! Hell, even the Indian Arjun is officially "better" than exported T-90Ss. Face it: Comparing wolves to pigs who killed innocent wolves is sick. Russia would fall under the pressure of American might.

  • @Tyco200 Смотри, американец, своим могуществом не подавись.

  • @Tyco200 when u judge military equipment is best to be objective having ur eyes and ur mind open despite the fact that u like 1 side more or less.u said abrams is great.and t90.telling that seems u dont know that abrmas can be detected from the space even cause it uses gen engine,.rpoducing heat,noise in a high degree.though it has beter pipe than t90 but t90 is more agile and hard to detect it.t90 and abrmas r outdated or at least a middle class tank.not so good but kinda bad..both of them.

  • we some t-90 at the brigade where i live now - this machine is super-over-tank! But there is a little bas news for all t-90 lovers --- the tank is hard in use, it is not for standard semi-stupid soldier.

    ---

    Всё конечно хорошо, но танк не для тупоголовых. Прошлым летом случился неприятный инцидент на учениях, погибли люди. Вот что бывает когда крутая техника сталкивается с плохо обученным персоналом.

  • my fav tank light , mobility , fast ,strange and good reactive armor !

  • to repair abrams you need an engineer and specialistic stuff to repair t 90 you need vodka and sasha

  • Russia power supreme!

  • i love Russian military videos sound tracks!

  • In soviet russia a tank is the only form of transport

  • How many mm is its cannon?

  • @kurdishgeneral pretty sure its 125mm

  • @SSFTC

    thank you

  • I think that nowadays wars are fought with missiles - unless it's guerilla. I fail to see the place of tanks in all that.

  • I would pick the abrams over the T-90 but there both pretty good. The challenger however was a complete replica of the abrams but still poses a good fight. However the abrams still surpasses any other tanks with state of the art technology.

  • Ok...let me start this thread by apologizing to fritttop...have we learned nothing from history...no one wins in war...our sons die...our mothers cry...for what...greed? Power? Done talking tanks and war...lets talk about fast cars or motorcycles. ..

  • And why would we steel technology from Russia...your 30 years behind us...Lol

  • @gixxerlouis Different from you russians technology always proves reliable when used properly.

    All those russian tanks you destroyed in iraq weren't updated nor upgraded since they were purchased.

    A fully upgraded T-72 is just as good as an abrams, and it can withstand abrams rounds.

    Good luck americunts when you'll be off facing anything better than 20 years old technology.

  • @haghaghaghaag fully upgraded the t72s armor is about 700mm rha vs ke, the m829a3 can penetrate over 800mm rha and was designed to defeat the most advanced armor that has yet to be appiled to russian tanks kaktus, our rounds keep getting better, while russians rounds fall behind, due to the fact that round has to be limited to be fired from your autoloaders, american rounds keep getting, bigger, longer and heavier, which means the abrams wins easily even against upgraded t72s, i mean t90s

  • @gixxerlouis

    Why are you using their rockets instead of yours if they are 30 years behind?

    Oh wait i know. They work.

  • Lol...how's life in Russia nowadays...pathetic potato juice drinking fag...you know as well as i do the US would own Russia in less than a month...

  • @gixxerlouis Maybe you should own the Afghanistan first? You were not able to defeat the Taliban in 10 fucking years! And now you want to own Russia in 1 month?! I love this American shit-heads! LOL! So fucking funny hilarious!

  • @Anderas777

    haha, the truth man

    btw

    america should sell half of their aircraft carriers....then they wouldnt be insolvent!!

    tell me, why they need 10 (!!) of them?! one of them cost 2,5mio $ per day!!!

    ONE b2 bomber costs 1 billion $

    ONE f22 raptor costs 180 mio $

    such a miracle, that the usa is insolvent now -.-

    and all other poeple in the world will suffer because of that...like 2008 lehman crisis...the result was, that i lost my job...THANK YOU USA!!

  • @Anderas777 how have you russians fared in checyna, lost over 20,000 men against gureillas and killed over 200,000 innocent civilians, we arent in afganistan to conquer it we are their to secure it and that takes time, we have made far more progrees in afganistan than you incompetent soviets ever did

  • @packr72 What progress you mean?! You kill 15 civilians in average for every single Taliban. All people in Afghanistan hate you and now they wish the soviets were coming back! All people in the world hate usa and waiting for your collapse. Your economy is fucked. Sorry my friend but you have to suffer soon! Your Empire of Evil must be destroyed!

  • @gixxerlouis seriously a month?

  • you guys are all crazy, both americans and russians. how can you possibly compare abrams, leo and t- tanks when they are completely different, and are used for different purposes. (with that said, i'd go with t-90m at this point).

  • The Leo 2 and m1 are in my opinion the 2 best mbt in the world with the challenger 2 right behind them...

  • That Russian tank is the same old crap they have made for the last 50 yrs...as far as the German tanks...just don't cut it in battle ramstien...m1 rules...

  • @gixxerlouis oh, is that that same old crap that pendoses made 50 years ago? it surely looks like it

    автор, если содрал видео у другого человека то ставь хотя бы копирайт

  • @gixxerlouis

    M1? lol

  • @gixxerlouis do you want to say that m1 is better than german leopard 2?

  • @gixxerlouis

    haha fucking american....all you can do is copying other technologies and say its your work, haha....m1 with the american 105mm wannebe cannon is fucking shit haha.....then you bought german technology and now you think it was your work haha....pathetic (insolvent) amerifags

  • @frotttiop we manufacture the gun because in truth the gun was orginally gonna to be installed on the mbt 70 which was a german/ american design, but i wouldnt expect an ignorant slav like you to understand who is probally under educated

  • @gixxerlouis

    you must think about your copying from german technology in ww2 too. haha you, with your stone age MGs were totally impressed about the german mg42 and fg42. then you try to copy the technique and the shitty m60 was the result, haha epic fail. and btw. tell me, why needs a m1 double capacity of fuel for the same driving range as the leopard?!

  • @frotttiop Leopard uses a diesel engine where as the Abrams uses a Gas-turbine engine. It gets shit for range and low-end torque, but we can use pretty much anything liquid that burns to run the Abrams, where as the Leopard is stuck using only low volatility fuels like kerosene and bio-diesel.

    Our penetrators are also far superior to yours! :P

  • @frotttiop потому что ты пидор

  • spaced armor...nice

  • this tank is

    UNSTOPABBRU!! >.<

  • Основной танк Российской армии Т-72))

  • Основной танк Индийской армии Т-90

  • VODKA VS. McDonald's

  • @egorhdhhh vodka wins fair and square

  • @egorhdhhh dude..mcdonald's can't win ;)

  • @egorhdhhh both

  • @egorhdhhh ill bet on a fat guy over a sloppy drunk anyday!

  • @egorhdhhh ))))

  • блеать даже у волка перегар в русской презентации

  • MIght be the best tank in the world. But you have to be able to get it to the battlefield and Russia has limited heavy lift capability.

  • Respect from Serbia !!! Braco nasa do smrti smo zajedno !!! ORTODOX BROTHERS!

  • Comment removed

  • außgerechnet einen Wolf für diesen Werbefilm zu nehmen, ist der reine Hohn, Wölfe haben in Russland kein Lebensrecht und werden das ganze Jahr über gejagt, vergiftet, erschossen, erschlagen oder sonst wie getötet.

    Aber der Panzer scheint einer der besten zu sein.........

  • z.o.g.-a.c.a.b. anti-russian and anti-aryan symbol in the top right corner, but the tank and a wolf in videoclip is awesome anyway! Только акпп, лучшие компьютеры, трёхмерная виртуальная карта, большие панорамные мониторы, цифровая связь со спутниками и штабами и удалёнными компьютерами и базами данных нужна! 88!

  • Nice..no more!!!

  • @brandonbig1 Nah, its a good tank but no good for sustained battles. Its too reliant on fuel convoys to stay in the battle for long with its thirsty Jet engines. German Leopard every time. They can litterally build a tank out of two destroyed ones in a matter of hours because of its modular components. Also very quick better on fual and great armour. Easiest tanks to drive out of the lot too. A kid can drive on with half hours training. (ALthough not very well).

  • большинство не любят, поверь)

  • i think the leopard 2 a7 is the best in the world.and now will the fucking government of germany sell 200 to saudi-arabia!this fucking,shit regime saudi-arabia become the best tank from us?i am very angry for this,fucking german government only think for the money.how can i give this shit-regime so good weapons?

  • @brandonbig1

    The best crap

  • @brandonbig1

    haha without the german 120mm rheinmetall canon your tank would be nothing....! and your funny turbine tank needs double of fuel than the leopard with the SAME power!....haha typical american "economy"

    the m1 is really not a bad tank, but only at second place......first is the leopard 2....german engineering!

  • @frotttiop

    It was certainly nothing when it was armed with a 105mm American gun and still 1 shotting T-55s and T-72s and everything in between.

  • @frotttiop it may be a german gun, but the usa makes the best ammo, in fact the only ammo designed to defeat over 750mm rha vs ke is the m829a3, power, only the t80 has a better power to weight ratio and the abrams turbine can run on low quality kerosine while the leo2 has to run on diesel, i can make fuel in my kitchen that could power the abrams, and plus we have near unlimited gas at this time, but by no means is the leo2 anything lower than 3 on the list, 1and 2 are the abrams and chally2

  • @packr72

    fail....-.-

    the leo2 has a multifuel engine... it can run with (liquid) frying fat if you want......!

  • if you ask me russians never made a made a good tank

  • @vladimirmilojevic1 no russians no americans germans are the best in armor

  • @vladimirmilojevic1

    Your're right, no one asks you about tanks

  • I prefer the German Leopard II A7. ^^

  • Omg when u people learn ..Abrams is superior ..Ughh

  • @KingPebble15 T90 < Abrams < Leopard 2

  • @Prof1989 nope m1a2sep2/tusk <= leo2a7 < changer2 < T90k < merkava mk4 as of 2011 top MBT whooping ass.

  • T-90 is here to break american legs.

  • @Zukhov1945 Well, not very nice. However, facts are difficult to repulse: Russian Ministry of Defence refuse to buy T-90s any longer. Any versions of them "60% outdated" according to Mr. Serdyukov. All hopes are put into a new project "Armata". But, for sure MoD RF closed discussion on T-90, by stating: outdated.

  • Мда, музика хренова...однако танчок хорошии :)

  • Nice vid but the tank itself is a rolling pile of junk. The T90 is like the 17th modification of the original T-72 design. Russia wants to spend 500 billions on new tanks but their own industry isnt able to deliver good products. Alexander Postnikov, commander of russian groundforces himself stated that russian build quality is far behind nato standards and even the chines do better. Further he said that instead of spending 118 million rubels on a T90 they should rather buy 3 Leopard 2s.

  • @Phozz4 as much as i agree with you on everything you say i have to mention that the original t72 (which the whole series is based on) is the >lowest< medium tank ever created. They just need to make a new model from scratch while keeping the low profile. Having a lot of fancy gizmos inside is one thing but not getting hit is more important.

  • @Phozz4 At least it has a big gun

  • @Phozz4 Sure faggot, a russian commander would never say that, even if true. Russian tanks are highest quality possible, T-90 is far ahead Abrams and Leopard talking about defence systems. T-72 was not that bad, but you just can't think a 70s old tank without modernization and bad crew can beat a modern M1 with best equipment and training. Real challange is russian T-90A vs M1A2.

  • @Zukhov1945

    You're poorly informed and your insults won't help you in this matter. You should read your newspapers, for example RIANOWOSTI or Wedomosti. There are several articles and Interviews proving you`re wrong.

  • @Phozz4 Sasha relaly said that? Proof please. Sorry, but T90M is proven as best tank, because of light armour, autoreload system, sorry but Leopards are shit. Average European tanks.

  • @PhantomOfUFC leopards are shit, russian generals have said bying leo2s would be a better investment over the t90, and the t90 has proved nothing, the autoloader looks good on paper, but it limits ammo size, its light armor is good for that design, but inferior to chopham style that the abrams and chally2 use, and russian tanks require era cause their armor is not thick enough to stand up to even rounds made in the 80s

  • what's up with the wolves

  • the best tank from the world

  • да уж какосы кроме водка бомбы и медведи про Россию видимо ничего не знают.)))) пусть спокойно жуют гамбургеры ....... это их броня "шит" полный

  • T-80 with a LOT of imporvements. Not bad.... but not as good as a tank built from the ground up.

  • Leopard 2A6 is the best

  • t90 armour is shit

  • @ManicMammoth Why, because it's not british, germany or american? LOL

  • Russians tanks cheap to produce

    Russia will send 10000 against 1000 best

    Who will win?

    Russia they will kill you western with a bare hands

    If you do not believe try again Napoleon did try Hitler did tried

    It is a USA turn LOL

    Funny USA will never won against 11 time zone country

    ONly IDIOTS from USA goverment think it is possible LOL

    NO it is not possible even if you will won against Russia

    Ukrain , Belorussia, Kazahstan and many more will go after USA after that

  • @wg390 LOLO, 10,000? In EIGHTEEN years of production, Russia has managed to produce fewer than 400 T-90s. Perhaps that is because its annual military budget is smaller than that of France, and 30% of that budget is lost evey year to theft from corrupt Russian officers.

  • @wg390 really like those mighty russian soldiers that have been slaughtered by chechnyan rebels since the coldwar ended, which we won and that means that we defeated a country with 11 time zones, and we are not france or germany, we have more manpower that russia and a greater industrial capability during time of war, russia barely has 6000 operation tanks, most are t80s proven to be shit

    kazahstan greatest counrty in the world all of others are run by little girls,

  • music and technology remember ZX SPECTRUM epoque

  • Оплот І Булат фореве

    russia suck

  • @Lemberg911 OPLOT - A Mainbattle Tank based on the T-80. Ukraine is still not able to build something on their own so they have to take and modify russian Weapons.

    One thing I hate more than naive Yanks are scumbags like you. Slavic People who sold themself during WW2 to fascists like Hitler. Scumbags with no Pride and Honor who turned on their Brothers. Even Serbs have much more Pride and Honor than Pigs like you will ever have. Now I feel Proud that WE killed Stepan Bandera!

  • @SovjetPhoenix First of all, not all of us yanks are naive. Second, I agree. Ukraine can't do shit. Third, people that sell themselves out to people like the nazis shouldn't even be alive.

    Finally, why do all people that are not americans call all americans yanks? I'm a southerner, and I hate it when somebody from another country calls me a yank. Its a disgrace.

  • @SovjetPhoenix AND WHO THE FUCK IS STEPAN BANDERA????

  • @thevindicaresbrother A ukrainian facist who was working together with the SS. He and his men killed many slavic and jewish People. There are countless ukrainians who support Bandera's deeds, ukrainian ex-president Jushtshenko is one of them. Bandera was executed after WW2.

  • M1A2 kicks her ass admit that usa is better in the realm of warfare 

  • @voncagnek How can you even compare the M1A2 tank with a t-90? M1A2 does not even have a system for automatic loading because of this tower is necessary to do a much taller and wider, and under her burden the bottom of the tank, because of this, with an equal thickness of an American tank armor is much heavier than his Russian counterpart, I am not talking about that that Russian tanks in addition to the basic armor protected by active and the passive protection ...

  • @voncagnek Your comparison is like to compare healthy and heavy grandfather's musket with manual charging after each shot with an automatic rifle ... But the musket as the U.S., so in your opinion the best: D

  • музика хренова

    

  • @virusnjk Некоторые любят, а некоторые нет

  • @virusnjk youTube this please. A-10 THUNDERBOLT II (Warthog). Fuck yeah!!

  • Best tank should be fast, easy and maneuverable.

    Russian tank T-90 has all these qualities.

  • @MrSrgj Its the classic east versus west military philosophy, the east has always relied on calvary, maneuverable, and speed, the west has always relied on communication, strength and power...... you have numbers we have intelligence, the odds are stacked, America respects Russia, we know you guys are strong, but will finish u non-the-less

  • @MrSrgj the abrams is faster and very maneuverable

  • Or, in a simple word.

    Shud up idiot, accept the fact other contryes may have their qualities and improvements to something better.

    Dont try be a blind winner, because you will be a bad looser. :)

  • For all this non-sense freedom-to-all-we-are-blessed-­by-god-americans who simply ignores the fact the USA ''free'' this people destroying their countryes with war and killing civilians and offcourse denying that later, and do not forget the USA enslave all sub-evolved countryes to their desires and political interests.

    So, to end all this bullshit harsh comments about russians and other nations.

    WE ALL HAVE PROBLEMS, AND WE ALL HAVE BAD TIMES, SHUD UP AND STOP ALL THE BULLSHIT.

  • Hah, dont worry people.

    This insult comments comming for this American idiot probably not have any fundament.

    Lets just say, for a guy who watch CNN and thinks he got all the reality, shouldnt even have access to websites like this one.

    Well, he likes to spill the facts of other countryes so many, than he forgets the facts of his own country.

    The real fact of all this is, no matter if is USA, RUSSIA, CHINA, GERMANY or any other, all countryes have their own putrid secrets and shames.

  • AMERICAN invented nothing. COPY ALL THE OTHERS.

  • @geckokiller except the lightbulb,telephone,radio,tele­graph, tv, computers, machine guns, revolving turrets, the internet, youtube, proximety fuses in artillery shells, bifocals,railroad rails,steam shovel,vulcanized rubber,ether,baseball,doughnut­, cupcake,gas mask,iverted micro scopes, the list go on and on, so go read a book, that's if you can read and please go fuck yourself before you mock a country as great as the usa, im sorry your jealous

  • @packr72

    yeah, all people in the world are jealous because your "great" country has a lot of money...oh wait, they have not...fail! haha

  • why the fuck does everyone have a hard on for russia?

    their country is shit

    did you know you can get 6 years in prison for having more than 6 grams of weed in russia? of course you can just bribe your way out considering how fucking corrupt their police are. and the fact that its in the top 5 most murders in the world

    fuck russia and their shitty government. and fuck this "it's hip to love russia" backwater society.

  • @TwistedComplex fuck america and ur stupid ass comments gtfo

  • @braveryhawk someone sounds mad

  • @TwistedComplex Someone sound, fat, nerdy and completly virgin.

  • @TwistedComplex im not mad, im just tired of fags who watch videos just for putting bad comments on it to break it down...

  • O poor