Capitalists, maoists and nazis and its intransigent struggle against historical science: capitalism didn't profit from child labor, colonialism and slavement; Pol Pot starved and kill the cambodian people... instead he just did the only thing he could do -poor guy, don't judge him- and holocaust never happened. One more delusional guy confusing ideological faith with historicity . When marxism became this nonsense? Count me among you enemies.
@MaoistRebelNews2: What do you think about the Vietnam's invasion. It was right or wrong. I think the Vietnamese was right when they attacked and shut down the Khmer Rouge's regime. 'cause Khmer Rouge's soldier had killed so many Vietnamese people in the South West Vietnam and around the Cambodia-Vietnam border. Forgive me if my English was bad :D
I agree with most of the things you said in this video except your defense of Pol Pot. Pol Pot didant give a shit about what ideology he was, he only wanted funding and to keep the vietnamese out. In the later years of his rule he even denied that cambodia was ever communist and received funding from the USA. It is a mistake to say he only killed people who didant agree with his regime or the upper class, He killed 1000's of his own citizens for simple reasons and was a fierce racist. good vid
I don't mean this comment in a nasty way as I'm sure you are a decent enough person.
I have lived in Cambodia for many years. I know many people who lived through the period you describe and I have to tell you that in my opinion you are wrong about just about every aspect of your analysis.
To blame the depopulation of the cities on a famine is ridiculous.
I suggest that when you have the time you visit Phnom Penh. Go to S-21, go to Cheung Ek and speak to the survivors.
Its sad to know that the American Government supported the Khmer (pronounced kim-mare) regime that killed my family members. I recently went there to visit my relatives, they literally live in an area which was a war zone (mortar shell holes into palm trees). It was sad when my mother(Khmer Rouge Survivor) told me there use to be a jungle where she lived, now all i saw were large open plain fields of emptiness. Also after every rice field was finished, they would slaughter all the workers.
The bombings didn't start the problem, the NVA using Cambodia (illegally) as a staging ground and supply route was the start of the problem. The USA didn't bomb stuff just for shits and giggles.
It's interesting to note that Vietnamese removed Pol Pot's regime... with USSR support.
Anyways, I'm hugely in opposition to using strategic bombing as a "one pill cure all".
There were over 300,000 Chinese soldiers in Vietnam assisting the North Vietnamese. South Vietnam never invaded the North.
Furthermore, almost 1,400,000 South Vietnamese soldiers were made casualties fighting for a non-communist Vietnam. It's not that South Vietnam couldn't find people to fight, it's that their General Staff was ineffective, and American politics were easily exploited by the North Vietnamese. Furthermore, the US yanked vital economic aid in 1975 (Two years after American troops went home). Corruption was also rampant because of the economic and military uncertainty which breeds graft and hoarding.
@RogerwilcoFoxtrot NVA were in Cambodia because of the war the US was waging in their own country. That war was because of the illegal division of VN imposed by the US. The US pledged to support free national elections in VN, but then when it learned the people supported the Communists, the US put dictator Ngo Dinh Diem in power in Saigon, and that started the war. The Vietnamese were fighting to unify their country. And they had to be in Cambodia because of the bombing the US was doing in VN.
@jacobvardy communism was created and Marx was supported in London by the Fabian society, who also supporting/funding Lenin, the same people who also supported Hitler. Marx himself said that the world world start off with communist countries but become socialist... The world is guided on all political sides by a small group of people
How did you get into communism/Maoism in the first place?
The thing with Vietnam is that the Johnson administration didn't know fuck all about who they where fighting,They never factored in that the Vietnamese viewed the U.S as just another foreign conqueror like the french.
Topics: Terrorism, War, Politics, Religion, Philosophy, Science, The Secrets Of Human Essence And Happiness, THE MEANING OF THE PYRAMID, About the END OF THE WORLD, Debated issues, and many others.
Websites: balanceddiet1.yolasite.com, etc.
See Figure 4, which is THE MEANING OF THE PYRAMID, at figure4etc3.yolasite.com, etc.
See Announcements at announcements-balancedway.weebly.com, announcements-balancedway.yolasite.com, etc.
@Thomistica Do you have any credible sources to your claims? Or are you simply projecting your bourgeoise shattered view of reality. Like it or not Cambodia was in a dire suituation after 1975 and Pol Pol did what needed to do prevent the famine from killing even more people after the war. I do not claim that Pol Pot was perfect, as I disagree with his ideology and the attrocities commited under his guise. I do not however demonise him out of ignorence and reject the logical goals of his regime.
@ymir1986 The Pol Pot Regime: Race, Power, and Genocide in Cambodia under the Khmer Rouge, 1975-79 by Ben Kiernan (Second Edition; Yale University Press, 2002).
The Khmer Rouge was Maoist in that it followed Mao's 'unorthodox' example of a Socialist revolution in a country without an industrial proletariat (and thus without 'Capitalism' proper, really) -- a peasant revolution. There were obvious differences between the Chinese and the Cambodian experiences, but this was also Maoist in a sense; it followed Mao's example in combining Marxism-Leninism with the unique Cambodian culture, worldview, etc. -- like Mao, breaking from the 'orthodox' Soviet model.
@Thomistica Except Pol Pot didn't use any Marxism-Leninism. You can use Maoism without those two as well. All he did was have peasant based revolution. By that logic all peasant revolts against Kings in Europe were Maoist as well.
@MaoistRebelNews2 It seems to me that it was just a radically extremist (and distinctly Cambodian) version of M-L-M. Pol didn't simply have a peasant-based revolution. He aimed to wipe out classes by turning everyone into a peasant, working in collective farms; separating kids from their parents, keeping them 'pure' from 'bourgeois thinking'. Educated people were executed because of their 'bourgeois thinking': Too hard to re-educate, etc. It was like a perverted, psychopathic Maoism on steroids.
Good video mate :) Though you forgot to mention that the support the USA supported the Khmer Rouge well into the 80's after the Vietnames installed a Soviet proxy Goverment. Also the Khmer Rouge never truely Governed Democratic Kampuchea in a traditional sense as they remained as an loosely connected underground guerilla movement, meaning that it is absurd to claim that Pol Pot (or the central commitee)was responsible for all executions as there were plenty of rogue elements with the movement.
Love the video. Hint: go to this link tinyurl DOT com /3ray78d and press listen. I'm sorry, just want to give you the correct pronunciation for Xiaoping:)
Where are Pol Pot Anatomy of A Nightmare by Philip Short, The Political Economy of Human Rights Vols. 1 and 2 by Noam Chomsky and Ed Herman, Mao by Philip Short and so on? I don't necessarily disagree with what you're saying, but you're going to need more than two sources, and the ones referred to therein. Khmer is pronounced as one syllable; I don't understand why you're distorting the word. The phonetic version of it is on wikipedia: [pʰiːəsaː kʰmaːe], not the way you're pronouncing it.
@VaSavoir2007 Sorry I'm not saying ti the way you want. Sorry if the facts don't match your already held bourgeois belief. The guys didn't have any Maoism in him, no one can actually show that he did. They simply state that he said he did. By that same logic I am God because I say so.
@MaoistRebelNews2 You have not answered the question, & if you read me carefully, you will see I wrote: "I don't necessarily disagree with what you're saying". So assigning the beliefs to me you do is fallacious, and thus calling them bourgeois as well. I am merely pointing out relevant sources for you should you care to investigate further. As for the rest, I assume we're equally interested in the facts. I don't advance any of the arguments you think I'm advancing, including the non sequiturs.
Quit being petty. You could have corrected his pronunciation w/o being caustic.
Chomsky's evaluation of anything actually revolutionary is "meh." He represents much of what's wrong with the so called "libertarian left." So long as one keeps confusing anti-authoritarianism with class-warfare, one is doomed to the logic of bourgeois counter-revolution. There's a reason why the "orthodox" Marxists he upholds never amounted to much beyond becoming a wing of liberalism.
Yup. Factors like this are totally left out of the common western evaluations of the Soviet Union under Lenin and Stalin (esp the latter.) Part of this is due to outright deceit - part of it is due to the bourgeois logic of certain "leftist" thinkers (de facto liberals like Chomsky, Orwell, etc.)
There is a difference between what a market "justifies" (baring in mind that market evaluation is, as far as socialists are concerned, a highly problematic method of resource allocation and something to be overcome) and artificially inflating prices through the CREATION of scarcity.
The criminality of these farmers entirely merited the actions taken against them.
On the Stalin bit: i've read that the farmers hated the idea of collectivization. So they burned their crops and killed their animals rather then give them to the state. And that this lead to the massive starvation.
The truth about Pol Pot and Maoism is that Pol Pot was a valiant proponent of the international working class in south east Asia who fell victim to a tragic intersection of Nationalist and US imperialist anti communist convergence & Maoism is a correct & further development of the science that Marxism -Leninism is based in.
i love your videos. Ever heard of The Zapatistas from Chiapas, Mexico? If so, what do you think of them?:) You could make a video about them too. please:)
No truth here.
mcleanartists 12 hours ago
very interesting
5tar5z 2 days ago
an excellent analysis indeed.. i never really accepted the BS tuol sleng hoax
DarkprinX2500 1 month ago
Capitalists, maoists and nazis and its intransigent struggle against historical science: capitalism didn't profit from child labor, colonialism and slavement; Pol Pot starved and kill the cambodian people... instead he just did the only thing he could do -poor guy, don't judge him- and holocaust never happened. One more delusional guy confusing ideological faith with historicity . When marxism became this nonsense? Count me among you enemies.
magomezga 2 months ago
@MaoistRebelNews2: What do you think about the Vietnam's invasion. It was right or wrong. I think the Vietnamese was right when they attacked and shut down the Khmer Rouge's regime. 'cause Khmer Rouge's soldier had killed so many Vietnamese people in the South West Vietnam and around the Cambodia-Vietnam border. Forgive me if my English was bad :D
TheNThanhViet 2 months ago in playlist More videos from MaoistRebelNews2
are you kidding ?
Perseiden2 3 months ago
I agree with most of the things you said in this video except your defense of Pol Pot. Pol Pot didant give a shit about what ideology he was, he only wanted funding and to keep the vietnamese out. In the later years of his rule he even denied that cambodia was ever communist and received funding from the USA. It is a mistake to say he only killed people who didant agree with his regime or the upper class, He killed 1000's of his own citizens for simple reasons and was a fierce racist. good vid
REVOLUTIONARYgs 3 months ago
I don't mean this comment in a nasty way as I'm sure you are a decent enough person.
I have lived in Cambodia for many years. I know many people who lived through the period you describe and I have to tell you that in my opinion you are wrong about just about every aspect of your analysis.
To blame the depopulation of the cities on a famine is ridiculous.
I suggest that when you have the time you visit Phnom Penh. Go to S-21, go to Cheung Ek and speak to the survivors.
Take care.
JHart635 3 months ago
You look like you're coming down from a high.
Iquickscopeonmw2 4 months ago
Its sad to know that the American Government supported the Khmer (pronounced kim-mare) regime that killed my family members. I recently went there to visit my relatives, they literally live in an area which was a war zone (mortar shell holes into palm trees). It was sad when my mother(Khmer Rouge Survivor) told me there use to be a jungle where she lived, now all i saw were large open plain fields of emptiness. Also after every rice field was finished, they would slaughter all the workers.
doggahuskhusk 6 months ago
The bombings didn't start the problem, the NVA using Cambodia (illegally) as a staging ground and supply route was the start of the problem. The USA didn't bomb stuff just for shits and giggles.
It's interesting to note that Vietnamese removed Pol Pot's regime... with USSR support.
Anyways, I'm hugely in opposition to using strategic bombing as a "one pill cure all".
There were over 300,000 Chinese soldiers in Vietnam assisting the North Vietnamese. South Vietnam never invaded the North.
RogerwilcoFoxtrot 7 months ago
Furthermore, almost 1,400,000 South Vietnamese soldiers were made casualties fighting for a non-communist Vietnam. It's not that South Vietnam couldn't find people to fight, it's that their General Staff was ineffective, and American politics were easily exploited by the North Vietnamese. Furthermore, the US yanked vital economic aid in 1975 (Two years after American troops went home). Corruption was also rampant because of the economic and military uncertainty which breeds graft and hoarding.
RogerwilcoFoxtrot 7 months ago
@RogerwilcoFoxtrot NVA were in Cambodia because of the war the US was waging in their own country. That war was because of the illegal division of VN imposed by the US. The US pledged to support free national elections in VN, but then when it learned the people supported the Communists, the US put dictator Ngo Dinh Diem in power in Saigon, and that started the war. The Vietnamese were fighting to unify their country. And they had to be in Cambodia because of the bombing the US was doing in VN.
RedBannerOfThePeople 5 months ago
make a vid on your thoughts on Stalin, on what actually happened, or if you have already done so, what is the name of it?
XxOBSOLETExxTVxX 7 months ago
Weren't the Yanks supporting the Khmere Rouge prior to the Vietnamese attack?
jacobvardy 7 months ago
@jacobvardy Sort of, they wanted to be in good with both sides in case they won. Tried the same thing with Castro.
MaoistRebelNews2 7 months ago
@MaoistRebelNews2 I've heard Alex Jones say that the US was pro-Castro, and thus they *had* to be pro-communist. Totally bogus.
juliaisafilmbuff123 7 months ago
@juliaisafilmbuff123 God that's stupid. They tried to get in his favor in case he over threw Batista.
MaoistRebelNews2 7 months ago
@jacobvardy communism was created and Marx was supported in London by the Fabian society, who also supporting/funding Lenin, the same people who also supported Hitler. Marx himself said that the world world start off with communist countries but become socialist... The world is guided on all political sides by a small group of people
coffee2bsmelt 2 weeks ago
@jacobvardy There's the truth, then there's the Internet.
mcleanartists 12 hours ago
We all know that the uae of force ias always good. "It's for your own good" is always the excuse for tyrants.
jujigatame1976 7 months ago
How did you get into communism/Maoism in the first place?
The thing with Vietnam is that the Johnson administration didn't know fuck all about who they where fighting,They never factored in that the Vietnamese viewed the U.S as just another foreign conqueror like the french.
Obasiliasfilosofos 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
NEW BOOK TO READ FOR YOUR ENJOYMENT
Topics: Terrorism, War, Politics, Religion, Philosophy, Science, The Secrets Of Human Essence And Happiness, THE MEANING OF THE PYRAMID, About the END OF THE WORLD, Debated issues, and many others.
Websites: balanceddiet1.yolasite.com, etc.
See Figure 4, which is THE MEANING OF THE PYRAMID, at figure4etc3.yolasite.com, etc.
See Announcements at announcements-balancedway.weebly.com, announcements-balancedway.yolasite.com, etc.
TheServiceWeb 7 months ago
@Thomistica Do you have any credible sources to your claims? Or are you simply projecting your bourgeoise shattered view of reality. Like it or not Cambodia was in a dire suituation after 1975 and Pol Pol did what needed to do prevent the famine from killing even more people after the war. I do not claim that Pol Pot was perfect, as I disagree with his ideology and the attrocities commited under his guise. I do not however demonise him out of ignorence and reject the logical goals of his regime.
ymir1986 7 months ago
@ymir1986 The Pol Pot Regime: Race, Power, and Genocide in Cambodia under the Khmer Rouge, 1975-79 by Ben Kiernan (Second Edition; Yale University Press, 2002).
Thomistica 7 months ago
The Khmer Rouge was Maoist in that it followed Mao's 'unorthodox' example of a Socialist revolution in a country without an industrial proletariat (and thus without 'Capitalism' proper, really) -- a peasant revolution. There were obvious differences between the Chinese and the Cambodian experiences, but this was also Maoist in a sense; it followed Mao's example in combining Marxism-Leninism with the unique Cambodian culture, worldview, etc. -- like Mao, breaking from the 'orthodox' Soviet model.
Thomistica 7 months ago 2
@Thomistica Except Pol Pot didn't use any Marxism-Leninism. You can use Maoism without those two as well. All he did was have peasant based revolution. By that logic all peasant revolts against Kings in Europe were Maoist as well.
MaoistRebelNews2 7 months ago
@MaoistRebelNews2 It seems to me that it was just a radically extremist (and distinctly Cambodian) version of M-L-M. Pol didn't simply have a peasant-based revolution. He aimed to wipe out classes by turning everyone into a peasant, working in collective farms; separating kids from their parents, keeping them 'pure' from 'bourgeois thinking'. Educated people were executed because of their 'bourgeois thinking': Too hard to re-educate, etc. It was like a perverted, psychopathic Maoism on steroids.
Thomistica 7 months ago
@MaoistRebelNews2 I understand what your saying, but what about Toul Sleng
RaptorOfTheWest 7 months ago
Good video mate :) Though you forgot to mention that the support the USA supported the Khmer Rouge well into the 80's after the Vietnames installed a Soviet proxy Goverment. Also the Khmer Rouge never truely Governed Democratic Kampuchea in a traditional sense as they remained as an loosely connected underground guerilla movement, meaning that it is absurd to claim that Pol Pot (or the central commitee)was responsible for all executions as there were plenty of rogue elements with the movement.
ymir1986 7 months ago
dont believe in this video
kzamno1 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Love the video. Hint: go to this link tinyurl DOT com /3ray78d and press listen. I'm sorry, just want to give you the correct pronunciation for Xiaoping:)
denis505 7 months ago
USA view of Socialists -- People who drinks vodka, and murders people who dont agree with them, and tries to take over the world.
bittemeinrammstein 7 months ago
You couldn't be more full of shit. Learn the facts before you to spewing your stupid propaganda.
dazzumweb 7 months ago
Sick fuckers Loooooveee the communists.
crwlarry3356 7 months ago
Socialist nations - just wants a fair life, with obvious exploits in the open9who doesnt?)
United states - Demoting socialist nations in the media, suggest for everyone to hand over wallet for "freedom" and overtime jobs
AznDuD333 7 months ago
I like your videos! :D
AusVietnamesePride 7 months ago
Where are Pol Pot Anatomy of A Nightmare by Philip Short, The Political Economy of Human Rights Vols. 1 and 2 by Noam Chomsky and Ed Herman, Mao by Philip Short and so on? I don't necessarily disagree with what you're saying, but you're going to need more than two sources, and the ones referred to therein. Khmer is pronounced as one syllable; I don't understand why you're distorting the word. The phonetic version of it is on wikipedia: [pʰiːəsaː kʰmaːe], not the way you're pronouncing it.
VaSavoir2007 7 months ago
@VaSavoir2007 Sorry I'm not saying ti the way you want. Sorry if the facts don't match your already held bourgeois belief. The guys didn't have any Maoism in him, no one can actually show that he did. They simply state that he said he did. By that same logic I am God because I say so.
MaoistRebelNews2 7 months ago
Comment removed
VaSavoir2007 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@MaoistRebelNews2 You have not answered the question, & if you read me carefully, you will see I wrote: "I don't necessarily disagree with what you're saying". So assigning the beliefs to me you do is fallacious, and thus calling them bourgeois as well. I am merely pointing out relevant sources for you should you care to investigate further. As for the rest, I assume we're equally interested in the facts. I don't advance any of the arguments you think I'm advancing, including the non sequiturs.
VaSavoir2007 7 months ago
@VaSavoir2007
Quit being petty. You could have corrected his pronunciation w/o being caustic.
Chomsky's evaluation of anything actually revolutionary is "meh." He represents much of what's wrong with the so called "libertarian left." So long as one keeps confusing anti-authoritarianism with class-warfare, one is doomed to the logic of bourgeois counter-revolution. There's a reason why the "orthodox" Marxists he upholds never amounted to much beyond becoming a wing of liberalism.
RemoveYourChains 7 months ago
Comment removed
VaSavoir2007 7 months ago
Nice video (Y) Keep them up
machinehead5760 7 months ago
Very well spoken.
Hardworker1970 7 months ago
Very interesting.
ThePositiveAussie 7 months ago
Absolutely, the fucking kulaks deserved the persecution they got.
jumpnjza2 7 months ago
@jumpnjza2
Yup. Factors like this are totally left out of the common western evaluations of the Soviet Union under Lenin and Stalin (esp the latter.) Part of this is due to outright deceit - part of it is due to the bourgeois logic of certain "leftist" thinkers (de facto liberals like Chomsky, Orwell, etc.)
RemoveYourChains 7 months ago
Comment removed
jumpnjza2 7 months ago
Excellent video.
jumpnjza2 7 months ago
FINALLY YOU UPLOADED THIS YOU RED SON OF A BITCH!!!
Cant wait to watch! I hope the mutliverse doesn't get wiped out before I am done!
fonkymaster 7 months ago 5
This has been flagged as spam show
@fonkymaster Blame Cuba if it does.
Scientisticsoviet 7 months ago
You need to teach more history and start to giving links of website or books, great work keep it up !
HanZeroon 7 months ago
@HanZeroon sources in description
MaoistRebelNews2 7 months ago
You have to raise prices in a shortage, otherwise you'll run out of that stuff faster.
greenghost2008 7 months ago
@greenghost2008
There is a difference between what a market "justifies" (baring in mind that market evaluation is, as far as socialists are concerned, a highly problematic method of resource allocation and something to be overcome) and artificially inflating prices through the CREATION of scarcity.
The criminality of these farmers entirely merited the actions taken against them.
RemoveYourChains 7 months ago
@RemoveYourChains government did the same thing during the depression.
greenghost2008 7 months ago
On the Stalin bit: i've read that the farmers hated the idea of collectivization. So they burned their crops and killed their animals rather then give them to the state. And that this lead to the massive starvation.
DutchRedWolf 7 months ago
@DutchRedWolf true, but the starvation started before the collectivisation.
allal231 7 months ago
@allal231 The conspiracy of the wealthier farmers made a bad situation much worse.
RemoveYourChains 7 months ago
The truth about Pol Pot and Maoism is that Pol Pot was a valiant proponent of the international working class in south east Asia who fell victim to a tragic intersection of Nationalist and US imperialist anti communist convergence & Maoism is a correct & further development of the science that Marxism -Leninism is based in.
yorubablk3 7 months ago
Pol Pot wasn't too bad in the beginning, however he turned into a major cunt later on, needing to be overthrown. Vietnamese Communist got rid of him.
AtheismCentral 7 months ago
i love your videos. Ever heard of The Zapatistas from Chiapas, Mexico? If so, what do you think of them?:) You could make a video about them too. please:)
ThaKidFrankiee 7 months ago
@ThaKidFrankiee Zapatisats, they reule so much I had them tattooed on me
MaoistRebelNews2 7 months ago
@MaoistRebelNews2 lol really?
ThaKidFrankiee 7 months ago
@ThaKidFrankiee yes, really
MaoistRebelNews2 7 months ago
@MaoistRebelNews2 Holy shit, you MUST make a video on the zapatistas. One thing to unite marxists and anarchists. :)
juliaisafilmbuff123 7 months ago
@MaoistRebelNews2 pics or it didn't happen
epsilon8998 7 months ago
@epsilon8998 shit, you can see it in some of my vids and every time on BlogTV
MaoistRebelNews2 7 months ago
@MaoistRebelNews2 I see no pics in this vid. Pony up or I'm callin shenaniyams
epsilon8998 7 months ago
@epsilon8998 its not in this one, its in others and it can be seen in BlogTV
MaoistRebelNews2 7 months ago
@MaoistRebelNews2 You should do a vid shirtless and explain every tattoo you have and why it's there
epsilon8998 7 months ago
That conflict in Vietnam should've never happened, Damn Imperialistic pigs
Bigstarrocker9 7 months ago