Whoever this "debunker" is should really get a clue of what the fuck ever he's talking about. He didn't even get a single thing right, even stuff you can throw against Google in five seconds...
Screw loose change really has a screw loose. They keep repeating "it was not like a normal controlled demolition" Yes so what? First buildings so high to demolish ever and do they really think people planning crime of the century would make it look like or make it sound like a classical controlled demolition? But i dont like to get in to such a debates, it dosnt take you nowhere.Hard facts what AE911 is offering is the way to go, and after we get bottom of the hard facts, we can go further.
I facepalmed hard throughout this entire part.
Whoever this "debunker" is should really get a clue of what the fuck ever he's talking about. He didn't even get a single thing right, even stuff you can throw against Google in five seconds...
SexyMelon 1 year ago
Screw loose change really has a screw loose. They keep repeating "it was not like a normal controlled demolition" Yes so what? First buildings so high to demolish ever and do they really think people planning crime of the century would make it look like or make it sound like a classical controlled demolition? But i dont like to get in to such a debates, it dosnt take you nowhere.Hard facts what AE911 is offering is the way to go, and after we get bottom of the hard facts, we can go further.
Matu1 1 year ago 2
The would-be debunkers seem to think that by repeating their false claims over and over again they can 'prove' the official story is correct.
proudfootz 1 year ago