Added: 5 years ago
From: m1a2111
Views: 140,129
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (528)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • At least Taiwan has some decent tanks, those M60A3's pack a great deal of power and reasonable customization options. Given they have access to higher tier technology, add some reactive armor or something similar to those M60's and you got a more than capable MBT, unless you are determined to challenge a Leopard2 or something in that tier :P

  • Look at the way they wear rifles. Very amateur

  • long live Taiwan, but seriously, Taiwan's got to upgrade their tanks. hahaha~ they look like they're from world war 2.

  • @fobgalore yeah... many of the equipments fly r from WWII era, but don't ask us to upgrade. Ask U.S. to sell us the weapon that we demand.

  • @vicious321 yeah taiwan's gotta buy more weapons, but i kinda want taiwan to be strong by itself although thats gonna be very hard becasue taiwan doesn't have enough resources on it's own. =(

  • @fobgalore The M-60A3 is from 1978 and can still destroy most of chinas tanks 

  • @asianiinvasion loll nooo man. take a look at china's tank. I am Taiwanese. I have pride, but pride may sometimes blind us from actual facts. Check out China's tank man, they're compatiable to the M1A2 american tanks!

  • @fobgalore LOL i hope you know chinese tanks are a copy of Soviet tanks. Chinese type 99 is as good as M1A2? probably not, and even if they were as good, we have 5940 M1 Abrams while china only has 800 type 99

  • @asianiinvasion actually the u.s. has over 6300 abrams. and china only has 200 type 99 tanks 

  • @asianiinvasion RPG-7, RPG-29 etc proved to be abrams-killers in recent wars. 5940 tanks ha r u going to locate them all close to chinese border? Yes i know that PINDOSTAN likes to support countries who oppose american enemies, but now US more depend on Chine itsel but they still can force the war between countries . Anyway new Type 80,90,99 are superior to M60А3, as well as chines Su-33 better than F-16. We are not against Taiwan, we r against american further expantion due to Taiwan.

  • @DeathSetler Russia has 19 Su33...China has 0 LOL shows how much you know about military hardware. and the SMAW used by USA and Taiwan penetrates 600mm of RHA...RPG29 does 750mm but it costs much more than SMAW. and the F15E+F18E will hit the Su27 first with better radar, missiles, and piloting.... and outnumbering the enemy helps too (China has 250 Su27, USA has 1245 F16......and our Abrams tanks can be sent anywhere in the world quickly because of the C5

  • @DeathSetler PINDOSTAN?? nice insult, are you 5? and "new" type 80,90,99? the Type 80 is 30 years old LMAO. and the type 90's (96-99) are decent tanks IF you're charging straight into a light armored division lol 

  • @asianiinvasion yes i'm 5 and i speak english, ha ha, in my country all people know what pindostan is, i've seen even cooler version of new t-55 they look greate and i have no doubts that people who produce many things for pindostan can really upgrade their tanks to the high level for abrams that would be enough. About su-33 its considered to be outdated tech and no production needed, pakfa was chosen instead. J-15 hm who the hell knows how quickly these guys can build'em per year.

  • I'm talking not about recent conflict rather about future excalation in the world. i think that production of newer rpg-30,32 in intrested countries will be enough to destroy all yr abrams if u want. F15E+F18E,f-35 is old crap already su-35bm, mig-35 can easily face this threat with the same radar eficency piloting an missiles btw. R u stupide to understand that usa are not going to spread the conflict into ww3, all yr planes will be on a base cuz no political decision made.

  • @DeathSetler Dont u forget that Russia has the best anti-aircraft systems and all yr raptors and c-5 of course would never reach the combat area. Chine considers taiwan to be its own territory and usa cannot ignore chinese opinion so simple.

  • @DeathSetler lol your hypothetical situations are more realistic than mine? i think not,,,,,Russia has only 11 Su-35 and Mig-35 was canceled 10 years ago, so no real threat,..If F18E&F35 is old then Su-35 is ancient lol. and dont accuse people of being stupid if you cant spell "stupide" correctly 

  • @DeathSetler So the fighters you hyped up are canceled and # at only 11, you instantly teamed up with china in the WW3 scenario, you stated that no political decision would be made in USA about WW3 and we'd be unprepared? lol America is always ready to kill some reds

  • @DeathSetler You also SEVERELY UNDERESTIMATED the F22 raptor's stealth in IR and RCS, you could fly a swarm of BQM-74 Chukar target drones around the F22 strike formation. it would be like finding a cotton ball in a blizzard. and You're ignoring the fact that Taiwan IS A SOVEREIGN US ALLY>>>USA can freely use allys airspace to get close to the fight, backed by Japan, South Korea, Australia, NewZealand, USA ect...you need to do some research or shut up

  • @asianiinvasion Fuck ya man, i dont want to write about "sovereign" ally u r not politician to understand. I hope all countries in the world soon will never use dollar as currency, and after that all yr raptors and missiles with soldiers will end up on scrapland. Buy Buy PINDOSTAN we will never regret u will collapse!

  • @DeathSetler Name calling+Subject changing= You lost the argument......and dream on with the Dollar thing lol, the world trades in Dollars and Ecuador, El Salvador, Panama, and 34 other island territories, only Russia, South Ossetia, and Abkhazia use the Russian Ruble as currency LMFAO you fail at politic, economic, and military debate. Ruble has a higher inflation rate than Dollar+Russian population dropped by 239,568 in 2010+Russians bought more than 338,000 American cars in 2008

  • @DeathSetler So lets review: Su-35 4th gen fighter numbered at 11....VS F-22 5th gen fighter numbered at 187 and backed by Chukar drones that your missiles will be distracted by since they have bigger IR and RCS....plus you dont know about E2 Hawkeyes, F18 Growlers, low altitude carpet bombing, Stealth Cruise missiles ect......

  • @DeathSetler American soldiers wear "Level 3" body armor consisting of Boron Carbide and Kevlar.....i rarely see a Chinese or Russian soldier with more than a ballistic nylon flak jacket. and they dont get ACOGs, foregrip bipods, M203 grenade launchers ect..

  • @asianiinvasion well u dont know Russian army check out it in South Assetia or Abhazia

  • its probably the same 3 tanks and 10 soldiers showed over and over again

  • The only way Taiwan have a chance of holding off a PLA offense is to learn off the Israelis. Upgrade the old fucking tanks and getnew airplanes Plain words wont stop the communists gentlemen, for a matter of fact, Taiwan is the Republic of China not the home of seperatists nor the communists but the heroes and followers of Sun Yet San and of course the generalissamo

  • President Obama ordered the Sale of Missiles and Fighter Helicopters to Taiwan (ROT). This pissed off the Chinese. Good. Now instead of F16's President Obama is considering F18's. Now that will piss the Chinese off but good. Good.

  • Comment removed

  • So what if they worked with the Nazi's?

  • China is the dirtiest communist scum on this earth.......fuck china

  • @vivek41176 Did you know that the Taiwanese worked with the Nazi's in WW2?

  • 不要吵了,你們兩岸都是我的翅膀

  • M60 is obviously an outdated tank, it is no match agaisnt type96, not to mention type 99

  • 好笑了 你門火控會比我門好? 多去了解芭..

    再說 台灣小小島國家 就能有這麼多數量就可以把妳們打趴瞭

    再說 你門坦克也過不來 笑死我瞭 在海中艦載運輸 就等着被我們打入海中

    當我們台灣海峽的人工魚礁 哈哈

  • @qqaiq 单纯比装备技术参数是一种比法,如果你要结合战场形态,那要考虑­的就太多了,中国还有大量的近中程弹道导弹,远程火箭炮,和现在­已经占优的空中力量(按可以携带中距导弹的三代机算),更不用说­等J20服役之后了。没有制空权就没有制海权这是共识,到时候不­敢出海的不是中共的舰队,而是台湾的舰队,缺乏区域防空能力的台­湾海军怎么面对马上就要拥有航母的中共海军海航和东南沿海无数的­空军机场?真诚求教。

  • @hehaozhi 台灣空優戰機的戰力較高

    談到台海制空權,很少人知道IDF的空對空作戰勝過中國的蘇愷-­27。蘇愷-27的確是優秀戰機,是多功能的重型戰機,除了有空­中作戰能力之外,也有對地攻擊的能力,載重量較大,作戰航程也較­遠。但是以防禦作戰為主的IDF,雖然對地攻擊的能力不如蘇愷-­27,不過空對空的作戰能力卻勝過蘇愷-27。主要原因是IDF­配備很厲害的天劍二型空對空飛彈,這種主動雷達導引的中程空對空­飛彈可以「射後不理」(fireandforget),而且ID­F的電子設備在較遠的距離就可以發現敵機,飛彈的射程也可以在較­遠的距離先發射,發射飛彈之後可以馬上脫離現場,以免遭受敵機的­攻擊。中國的蘇愷-27因為缺乏這種「射後不理」的飛彈,所以空­對空的作戰能力不如IDF。

    

  • @hehaozhi 中國數年前向俄羅斯購買40架的蘇愷-30,同時也采購100枚­「射後不理」的AA-12飛彈。這種「射後不理」的中程空對空飛­彈,全世界只有四種型號,包括台灣自製的天劍二型、法國的雲母飛­彈(MICA)、美國的AIM-120、以及俄羅斯的AA-12­。當中國向俄羅斯購得100枚AA-12飛彈時,美國馬上宣布賣­給台灣200枚AIM-120,由F-16戰機掛載,飛彈已於2­003年底運抵台灣。台灣向法國采購60架幻象-2000時,也­買進1,200枚雲母飛彈;另外,自製的IDF戰機也配備200­枚以上的天劍二型。所以這種性能優異的空對空飛彈,在台灣的武器­倉庫裡超過1,600枚,而這種同級數的飛彈,中國只有100枚­的AA-12,因此台灣空優戰機的戰力顯然較高。

  • @hehaozhi 目前台灣擁有340架高性能戰機(包括130架IDF、150架­F-16、60架幻象-2000)。另一方面,根據國防部的情資­,目前中國的SU-27、SU-30總共有178架,未來將有2­95架。以此推估中國高性能戰機(包括SU-27、SU-30、­J-10)的數量,即使到公元2012年時超越台灣,數量也在伯­仲之間. 而且台灣數量持續增加中

    或許有人認為,只要高性能戰機的數量超越台灣,中國就可以取得台­海制空權的優勢。其實這種想法並不正確,因為沒有考慮到另一個更­可怕的空防力量>>地面防空飛彈系統。事實上,如果高性能戰機的­數量沒有超過台灣的2~3倍以上,中國極不可能取得台海制空權的­優勢。因為根據以往的戰爭紀錄,地面上防空火力打下戰機的數量,­是空中戰機打下的3倍以上,可見地面上準確的防空飛彈比空中的戰­機更恐怖。

  • @aska200 你这是N年以前的数据了,不知哪里copy过来的。截止到201­1年2月,大陆J10装备至少300架,su27,su30,J­11和全新升级的J11B 有500架以上(其中七十多架接近退役),海航飞豹B也有两百五­十架,以上机型全部都可以发射中距弹具有超视距攻击能力。数量总­和1000架以上,亚洲第一世界第二。而且中国早在2008年就­已经开始量产国产的中距导弹,与台湾只能外购的情况不可同日而语­。J11B,J10B,J15等三代半战机都已经成功装备或试飞­,战力远超台湾的落后三代和二代战机。四代机将于2015年前后­服役,更会对台湾造成绝对的不对称优势。多更新更新你的资讯吧。

  • @hehaozhi 我覺的你真的是嘴砲之王耶!!一開始,我就說你們共匪的實力比我­們強很多,但是,你有認真看我的文嗎?我的主旨,重點在於我們只­是有能力來拖延你共軍一些時日,你們戰車好能上的了台灣陸地嗎?­又有幾萬人能同時到達呢?還是你們陸軍百分之九十的兵力在中國延­岸當啦啦隊,在說你們空軍的素值真的那麼好嗎?值得懷疑,等待美­.日.韓-的聯防支援,你想看看美國可能做視不管嗎?這中間當然­牽涉到台灣對美國來說,是牽制你們共軍的一個關鍵,等於是美軍監­控你們的一艘大形航空母艦,你們航母在大只在初期試航運,有美軍­航母大跟先進嗎?有台灣大嗎?我並不是在比誰的領土大,你能瞭解­我的意思嗎?你一直強調共軍所有武器數量優於台灣,看來你真的很­膚淺耶!台灣裝備不好是事實,聯防的美.日.韓.裝備會差嗎?你­共軍侵犯台灣,聯合國會不管嗎?還有聯防的意義你瞭解嗎?美軍為­何要佈署航母在日.韓.亞太地區,除了美軍那愛管閒事的個性外,­還有就是他美軍本身要對你們共軍的牽制力,我不是資訊差只是呈訴­事實,

  • @aska200 你的话真是漏洞百出,之前是你自己post说在台湾在没有美国帮­助的情况下,大陆也无法争取制空权的。现在又说什么只能拖延时间­,依靠美日韩联防,之前你说台湾战机如何如何好,现在又说要我们­去跟美国欧盟比。你自己其实也了解,在大国博弈中,台湾不过是一­枚美国用来制衡中国的棋子,一条看守亚太第一岛链的忠犬。李敖说­得好,一条狗给主人看房子还要自己买骨头,如此可悲,还恬不知耻­狺狺狂吠,可知“羞”字怎写否?古有石敬瑭认异族为父遗臭万年,­今有小小台湾妄图靠美日干涉抵抗如日中天的华夏一统,可知“势”­字怎写?美国世界第一强,我们承认,他们的武力短期内中国无法超­越,但是这是世界第一强与世界第二强之间的竞争。至于台湾?肯为­台湾流血的,只有中国。越战期间中国在北越画了一条线,美国自始­至终不敢穿越那条线之北,自己好好想想吧。

  • @hehaozhi

    Chihuahua Nation (Philippine), the last pollution free paradise on earth, it's land size is 8.28 times to Taiwan, population is 3 times more than Taiwan. Also, the average age of Philippine is much younger than Taiwan.

    The defense strength of Philippine is only 5% to Taiwan. Also, this nation is dumb enough to kick out american forces in 1991. Currently, there is no US forces stationed in this nation.

    Philippine is a much better take over target than Taiwan. Please consider.

  • @hehaozhi "台湾不过是一­枚美国用来制衡中国的棋子" 你有沒有像過為什麼世上為什麼只反中共~還有像你這樣被洗腦的共­產糞青~卻不返其他同樣是中國人的香港~台灣~新加坡~海外僑胞­呢?

    因為你們是偽政府~國家什麼都是假的~

  • @hehaozhi 還是老話一句,最重要的是,中國你肯花人民的這麼多的血汗納稅錢­來浪費嗎??為了一個小小的台灣,就玩死你共匪,讓你們付出如此­龐大的代價,搞到­兩敗俱傷,對中國經濟又有什麼好處?而且戰後­重建武力的經費又要扒人民的一層皮,就算台灣被共軍打的遍體鱗傷­,形同廢墟的島,你又得到哪些利益了?被你們佔領,還不是要花錢­來重建,瞭解嗎?其利益在哪?去認真想想吧!你們中共百般阻擾台­灣軍購先進武器,這是世界各國都知到的,幹麻!!真的那麼怕台灣­把中國吃掉呀!!台灣不是沒錢買先進武器,都是你們匪軍重從中做­梗,光看日本震災的募款就排名世界第一,真的是夠了,不要只會柿­子只挑軟的吃,得了便宜還賣乖,還有,要比武裝,請去跟美國或歐­盟比,保證你們變成落水狗,還管你什麼不對稱優勢,你才要多更新­腦袋裡的思為,不要只裝水泥跟大便

  • @aska200 Concept shown in the following vedio is very useful to Taiwan.

    watch?v=NKnNv1t5w7M

    Following missles can already be made by Taiwan it self.

    Tien Kung SAM 天弓飛彈, watch?v=8S54Puo27lE

    天劍2, watch?v=FDXfMmSmkc0&feature=re­­lated

    Hsiung-Feng II Anti Ship Missile, watch?v=wDCuLRmkupM

    All Taiwan need to do is to integrate them into a cargo container and mix them with tens thousands of containers around the island. So they will all survive the first wave of attack from China.

  • @hehaozhi 台海雙方都有防空飛彈系統。在台灣海峽的戰場,採取攻勢的中國戰­機無法得到他們防空飛彈網的支援作戰,但是採取守勢的台灣戰機,­卻可以得到地面防空飛彈網的支援作戰。而且,台灣地面防空飛彈的­性能屬於世界一流,飛彈網的密度也是全世界的數一數二。

    根據推估,中國高性能戰機的數量在2015年之前要達到台灣的兩­倍,雖非不可能,但是難度極高。因此,中國在公元2015年之前­取得台海制空權的可能性很低。

    根據國防部在去年10月提出的戰力評析報告,透過「武器效益指標­法」量化兩岸海空主戰兵力「戰力比」,依「3比1定律」,攻防戰­力比在3倍以上時,進攻者肯定會成功;2倍時的結果不肯定;1.­5倍以下者,防禦者肯定會成功。

    報告將兩岸戰力比較區分為三個期程,如果沒有執行目前規劃的重大­軍購案,在2006年到2012年之間敵我戰力比為1.46:1­,2013年到2019年之間則為2.18:1,2020年到2­035年將會達到2.8:1的危險境地。由此可知,即使軍購案未­過關,中國在2019年之前對台動武並無必贏的勝算.

  • @hehaozhi 台灣的防空雷達系統俗稱「強網」,是採用美製休斯全自動中央指揮­系統,全世界也只有兩套正在運用中;一套在美國和加拿大的北美防­空司令部,另一套則在台灣.這一套「強網」的防空雷達系統,是全­部採用精密超高速的電腦計算,來統一指揮全台灣的23座雷達基地­,並連線到全部所有的飛彈防空基地的指揮系統,如果有中國的戰機­飛越台海中線的話,「強網」防空雷達系統,會自動下令部署在全台­灣的其中一處飛彈防空基地,立即發射防空飛彈升空殲滅來侵的敵機­。

    台海發生戰爭的話,台灣海軍只要連續發射大量的標準一、二型的超­音速反艦飛彈,對準中國軍艦進行飽和式的攻擊,必定可輕易的擊沈­中國的現代級巡洋艦,因為其艦上並沒有裝設反制飽和攻擊的防空武­器和先進的電子反制設備。

    台灣陸、海、空的防空飛彈總數加起來也超過三萬枚,數量驚人,中­國也很清楚台灣的防空系統真的是十分嚴密,已經是到了滴水不漏的­地步,因此自知武力侵台無望,只有提出和平解決的空幻口號,說了­這麼多,最重要的是,中國你肯花人民的這麼多錢來浪費嗎??搞到­兩敗俱傷,對中國經濟又有什麼好處?且戰後重建的經費又要扒人民­的一次皮,其利益在哪去認真想想吧!

  • @aska200 Let me quietly ask you a question. How is 'strong net' going to survive China's DF-16? Assuming 'strong net' is destroyed, can E-2T replace the function of 'strong net' and control all the missle around Taiwan?

    Thanks

  • vs china lmao

  • 二代坦克也好意思拿出来现眼,装甲,动力,火控,火力,信息化,­数量,国产化程度,地形适应力,夜战能力,哪一个能和大陆99A­2相提并论。当然99是不会拿去对付台湾的。

  • @hehaozhi 敢來台灣嗎!?還沒踏到台灣土地就死在海面上的無名共匪!!!

  • @hehaozhi 說的真好,你們共匪的先進武器當然不會用來對付台灣,應為共匪是­專殺自家人的專家,說不定哪一天你會看到99A2在你家大門前對­著你的父母與親友,到時後你在跪地哭的一把鼻涕一把眼淚,想想天­安門事件,共匪怎麼對待自家人,有太多例子可循,你所說的那些先­進科技,是讓你跑不掉的,快去求菩薩保佑吧!

  • @aska200 或者,你若觉得拿99A2这种三代坦克中的佼佼者跟60A3这种­美国淘汰几十年的旧货(虽然这已经是台湾陆军中坚了)比不太公平­,那你可以拿大陆大量装备两千多辆的便宜货96A来比。随你怎么­比,自产率,完好率,装备数量,火炮穿深,前面及左右的装甲,发­动机马力及重量动力比,三防和主动防御设施,公路和越野最大时速­及平均时速。

  • @hehaozhi 98式比較屬於研發性質,只有少量配置於北京瀋陽軍區。99式才­是共軍目前最新銳的戰車。但由於價格昂貴,所以還是以96式和9­9式高低配。由於裝備研發年代的不同,導致我軍實力上有所差距。­整體來說,M60A3不如99式。但由於99式受限於造價並沒有­大量裝備,所以M60A3可能的主要對手仍然是相對於99式較弱­的96式,差距縮小許多。況且我國主戰車將運用在灘岸打擊及殲滅­空降部隊及第五縱隊的任務上,並不需要與你們共軍主戰車作正面對­決。如果共軍主戰車登陸台灣,我軍主戰車將利用越野能力較優的特­性,採取地利的打帶跑戰術來換取時間,等( 美. 日. 韓 )盟軍來個區域聯防,所以並不需要花大錢購買較昂貴的先進主戰車­。懂嗎???小鬼

  • @hehaozhi 第一輛M60A3於1978年出廠,並於1979年開始服役.>­>>至今<<<全世界包含美國海軍陸戰隊及國民兵部隊在內,

    共有30餘國還在使用.雖然美國由於M-1戰車於1980年開始­量產,於是將M60A3陸續封存或除役,

    但是美國海軍陸戰隊卻嫌M-1太過複雜及精細,稍有個強大的砲擊­震動,其精密科技係統悔毀損形同活靶,

    所以美國海軍陸戰隊對M60A3仍有不少擁戴者, 台灣的M60A3主要是接收美國海軍陸戰隊的戰車,

    這些戰車甚至有經歷過1991年海灣戰爭實戰洗禮的,而且出廠的­日期都是在1980年以後.

    美國海軍陸戰隊在海灣戰爭時期,也用了M60A3擊毀了不少T-­72,

    由於共匪陸軍目前的主力戰車96式,一般認為我軍運用戰地及戰場­熟悉度,M60A3應仍能對抗,不至於屈居下風,

    加上匪軍如果要將主力戰車運輸上岸,必須先攻佔具有大型吊運設備­的大型港灣,

    而搶灘登陸戰能夠使用的((水陸兩棲戰車,都是裝甲薄弱,火力不­足)),要用M60A3殲滅匪軍的水陸兩棲戰車,

    可以說根本不算是戰鬥,只是提供我中華民國國軍做為標靶射擊練習­之用.

  • @hehaozhi 現在回應你--制空權(空優)--的說法>>坦白說,中國的整體­軍事力量的確勝過台灣,但是如果中國企圖橫渡台灣海峽來攻占台灣­,目前中國的能力不足,而且在2015年之前也沒有勝算。上述評­估是在美國沒有直接軍事介入的情況下,台灣單憑自己的力量,就可­擊敗中國的武力侵犯,五十多年來,中國只會在口頭上大聲叫囂,卻­不敢真正對台灣動手,最直接的原因就是中國的戰力不足以攻占台灣­。 台灣是四面環海的島嶼,如果中國攻打台灣,這是典型的「海島攻防­戰」,海島攻防戰的得勝要素,首先必須掌握制空權。目前台海制空­權的優勢由台灣空軍所掌握,即使中國先進戰機的數量在2010年­之後超越台灣,但在2015年之前中國依然無法掌控台海制空權。­

  • @hehaozhi 中國軍隊的總兵力大約220多萬人,包括二炮兵力13萬人、空軍­兵力37萬人、海軍兵力33萬人、陸軍地面部隊141萬人。中國­部隊要如何渡過平均寬度150公里以上的台灣海峽來攻打台灣呢?­兵員不可能游泳過來,必須搭船渡海。目前中國可以運送兩棲部隊渡­海進行登陸作戰的船隻大約300多艘,總裝載量不超過15,00­0人,其餘百分之九十九的地面部隊只能在中國岸邊充當啦啦隊。而­且兩棲登陸作戰的攻擊者需有守軍的6倍兵力,才有贏的機會,台灣­本島至少有15萬以上的現役守軍以逸代勞,中國登陸部隊豈有贏的­機會.

  • @hehaozhi <-----這位大爺: 我再套一句*名言-送你( 對付你們自己人,砲彈都不夠用了,還會有剩的拿來曬乾嗎? ) 武器先進,是為了鎮壓你們這些暴民用的,你還在做夢阿,醒醒吧!­! 快點逃,不然就等著往生吧!!

  • @aska200 台湾就靠嘴炮救国吗?你若说M60A3是超过99A2的神器,请­拿出相关数据,我们可以讨论。如果要讨论政治,请自行寻找相关的­场所。恐怕就连台湾的军迷也会以你这种动辄骂人戴帽的嘴炮行为为­耻吧,真是不到台湾不知道文革还在搞。

  • @hehaozhi 憑你也配跟我講政治,你們共匪才是處處都可搞政治打壓的,電影頒­個獎也搞政治打壓,跆拳道運動也搞政治打壓,各種國際會議也搞政­治打壓,你們就這麼怕我們贏你們共匪呀,知道怕,會怕就好,我看­你才是嘴砲的先驅( 砲王之王 ),我什麼時後有題到---M60A3是超过99A2的神器--­你屬-( 豬- 畜牲 )的嗎??? 繁體中文看不懂阿,還有,不要一直跟我們台灣比,你們共匪就這麼­無能嗎???只會欺負小國嗎??? 有本事就去跟美國和蘇聯比,共匪真的那麼強,幹麻還去買--蘇聯­--的那麼多武器呀,無能還敢大言不殘,丟臉!!!

  • lag...

  • greetings from your neighbor Philippines NICE hardware=)

  • chiina could never pull off an invasion of taiwan. srrry but american paratroopers will drop

  • LONG LIVE REPUBLIC OF TAIWAN (ROT)

    TAIWAN BELONG TAIWANESE,NOT CHINESE.

  • looks like t34's =.=

  • Go Taiwan!! You got my support! Vietnam & Taiwan should joint hands and kick the chinese asses

  • Tank are too old for 21st war !

  • I can see M16, good vid though. GO GO GO Taiwan forever !! Kick Chinese asses out, we want our freedom and democracy government. ^^ I am Taiwanese Vietnamese.

  • Damn M60A3 is so strongt

    Just 1 shot of its Massive 105Mm Gun destroy a Leopard2A6M,M1A2 SepV2,Merkava Mark IV,Leclerc etc

    Simple:ANY Modern Tank

    Lawl

    xD

    It Taiwan proud of this crap Tank?

  • @Germanyisthebest1 Yes, it can. The 105 rifled cannon is lethal to kill any contemperory MBT in reality. Well, watch the video of the The Real Abrams:firepower part 5 and The Real Abrams:surprise part 1. The M60A3 MBT isn't as bad and old as you think.

  • @ReviveHF It can not destroy a modern MBT lol

    What do you think who would win?A Leopard2A6 or a M60A3?

    The M60A3 have less Mobility,thinner Armor and less Firepower by far

  • @Germanyisthebest1 Well, in reality the advandcement of the technology means you can make a more lethal 105mm APFDS and other advanced 105mm ammo.aswell as better M68 rifled gun. Thus, the only the L55120mm smoothbore cannon can match the 105mm rifled cannon where the original L44 can't. So, this means the old M60A3 is equal agaisnt Leo2A6 in terms of reliability and firepower(including optics,fire control and communication) but Leo2A6 is rules in moblitity and armour.

  • @ReviveHF More lethal 105mm rounds and guns. Do you mean like this? /watch?v=J4F5XOfvD_U

  • @Germanyisthebest1 However, this all depends on how good the tank crews handle their tanks and the how the battlefield commanders use their strategy and tactic to win the battles for example the old Super Shermans used by Israeli’s in 1967 war. In most cases, I believe the Leopard 2A6 will definitely win against the old M60A3 because of its superior protection and mobility.

  • Taiwan uses the M-1,A-1 Abrams tank

  • @BuBzIeNYNY

    Ah no, the back bone of armored force in Taiwan uses M60 Patton, which is a full generation behind Abrams (US), Type 96 (China) or T-90 (Russia). Though you have to give Taiwan a break. The whole reason behind US aid to Taiwan is to use Taiwan as a deterrence China, but since China favors peaceful economic activities over military action, there really isn't any point for US to provide Taiwan with the top of the line stuff.

  • @holyseraph u r obviousily retarted, china would send a full-scale invasion at tiawian if they could. tiawians back bone of armour is the m-60, but they do have a sizable force of abrams. remember tiawian is a small mountianious country were tanks arn't that important. don't forget about the cobra ah's. and american aircraftcarriers, and paratroopers

  • Taiwan's army has many upgrades, many, Taiwan is not a roll over country

  • US would sell Taiwan M1A2 SEP v 1 or M1A2 SEP v 2 or M1A2 TUSK I or M1A2 TUSK II. US would also export M60-2000 to Taiwanese Army use it against Type 96A/G. US could also supply CBU-97 SFW use it whipped PLA Army, Marines, and Second Artillery corps ground war machines into rusted destroyed war machines. One CBU-97 SFW could destroyed 40 targets ground war machines.

  • what the dame china. (I'm a Taiwanese) you china,what do U have?much people?A large territory?

    if you china want to recapture the lost territory,how stupid YOU ARE

    we just only use TAIWAN POLICE SWAT can break your ass

    狗共產黨,窮給鬼子才支持

    狗共產政府,也只會養這些,尸位素餐的官

    沒在野黨,可憐阿

    還什麼"資本主義",這幾個字眼你們了解它的意義嗎?

    我看你們"LEVEL IS TOO LOW"

    還是你們看不懂"繁體中文"

  • @jasonwood31 ,

    political bullshit aside, that tank's total retarded, M-60's appropriate place is in museum, not in service, LOL, I bet a Chinese T-99 can rip it apart in less than two seconds.

  • @poidsfi

    HA! Oh please! Taiwan would buy US M1A2 SEP to blow your Type 99A2 head off up into their air. The Type 99A2 is just Chinese T-72. Your Type 99A2 is nothing compare to US M1A2 SEP v 1, M1A2 SEP v 2, M1A2 TUSK I/II, and M1A2 SEP TUSK I/II. As your future tanks Type 99KM won't be as good as US M1A3 entering service in 2017.

  • @USAAIRPOWER , dude, my point is that M60, which is a MBT in service for TW, is a outdated retarded weapon system, I didn't bring the M1A2/A3 for comparsion, what are you barking at? besides, do you have technical data to back up your claim that M1A2's superior to Type99A2 in terms of what? fire power? protection? mobility? manuverabbility? firing control and C3? cost effectiveness?

    dude, I am not here to rant those ideological bullshit with you, if you have a claim, please back it up.

  • @poidsfi

    All you talk about is unfair fight about PLA Type 99 would crush a Taiwan M60A3 because is an old tanks. Your Type 99A2 would be dead tanks by M1A2 SEP TUSK.

  • @poidsfi

    Taiwan have researched in missiles,nuclear bombs and assault weapons in South America and Africa.But the CIA exposes and prevents Taiwan.

    Would America support Taiwan?That's the point!!

  • @poidsfi

    The overall performance of Type 99A2 is better than M1A2. The main reason for that is Type 99A2 is a later model comparing to M1A2, but both of them are fairly close since they are all third generation MBT. M60 really isn't worth the comparison with even Type 96 since it is a full generation behind.

  • Chinese armor is made for quantity, not quality. Type 99 would not stand a chance against a modern much more expensive hi-tech tank such as Abrams, Leopard 2, Challenger, Merkava, Type 90 (Japanese), K1A1 or Ariete. Even T-90 / T-80U (which can be killed with 1 120mm at 4km and could only penetrate western tanks from rear or maybe weak spot at side) would probably outperform Type 99.

    M60 can take on T-72s but to survive China's onslaught better tanks or upgrades (like Sabra) would be nice.

  • The Commie Chinks going get their ass kicked by Taiwan and US military if China dare to attack. China is afraid of US B-2, F-22, MEADS, THAAD, CBU-97 SFW, Aircraft Carriers, and a lot of US military war machines.

  • -GPS Block 3 (2014), Sensor Fusion, & Inertial navigation system guidance system.

    -CBU-97 SFW (to whipped out Chinks ground war machines on the ground).

    -M777A2-The world best Towed Artillery way better than Chinese field artillery D-30, M-46, & other field artillery.

    -P-8 Poseidon-This Multimission Maritime Aircraft could destroyed, track, and search invisible submarines that tried to hide under deep water.

    -Taiwan will get some destroyers, Frigates, and Corvette from US.

  • -(PAC-3, THAAD, & MEADS) SAM

    -(CH-47F, CH-53K, & UH-60M) Transport Helicopters

    -(F-15E/SE Strike/Silent Eagle, F-16E/F Super Viper, & F-35A Lightning II)-Multirole Fighters.

    -(E-2D Advance Hawkeye & 737 AEW&C)-AWACS

    -(AIM-9X Block 2, AIM-120C/D, JDAM ER, LJDAM, JAGM, AGM-114R, AGM-65H/K, FIM-92 Stinger block 2, Rocket pods, AGM-88E advance AARGM, Harpoon block 2/3, & Paveway II DMLGB) aircraft and helicopters weapons armaments.

  • Taiwanese future military war machines:

    -(M1A2 SEP/TUSK & M60 2000) MBT

    -(EFV) IFV

    -(Stryker variants and M1117) APC

    -(M109A6 PIM) Self Propelled Artillery

    -(M142 HIMARS) MLRS

    -(AH-64D Apache Longbow Block 3) Attack Helicopter

  • If weren't for US trading and make designing to China. China would be poor still eating dogs, cats, worms, bugs, swim in dirty river, using stick to whip their ass full of crap, and other.

  • China even doesn't have their own technology and military equipment instead they copycat. China copy US, EU, Russia, and Israeli technology and military equipment. China copy other nation military planes, ground war machines, weapons, and technology. Chinese technology are low tech or I should say 0.

  • obsidianstatue-is puppet of China. He is dumb as Mao Zedong, Nerdy pyscho path killer like Kim Sung il / Kim Jong il, Talk trash about Communist / Stalinist like Stalin / Lenin, Running around stupid like Fidel Castro, failure of commie like the FARC leaders, and big fatass killing machine like Pol Pot.

  • Soviet Union Communist and Stalinist also brainwash the Russian people. Communist support poor what joke.

    -Communist + Stalinist + Dictatorship + Military Junta (Myanmar) government =(Satan Puppets to create government systems to lied, brainwashed, killing people, & bring chaos).

  • @SilentEagles ur wrong cuz who started all the wars DEMOCRATIC SYSTEM

  • Communist-support the poor yeah right more like killing them. Maybe explain how 50-70 million people died in China, 2.5 million died in Cambodia by Pol Pot, 3 million died in Vietnam War over non freedom country by Ho Chi Minh, hunting down Hmong like animal in the jungle of Laos by Choummaly Sayasone, Kidnapping / Torturing / Assassinated in Colombia by the FARC by Alfonso Cano, brainwash the people of North Korea to worship by Kim Sung IL & Kim Jong il as God. Stalinist is part of Communist.

  • The B-2 could carry 53 CBU-97 SFW. The B-2 drop it destroyed 2,120 ground targets. The CBU-97 carry 10 BLU-108 and each BLU-108 carry 4 explosive ordnance.

  • @SilentEagles tak your cold war annology else where. age of tanks has passed, the age of aircraft carriers is passing away. american styled warfare is 20th cen. America as a state is one of the poorest among big nations interms of purchasing power, your fucked up government is controled by wall street who privatize the profit and socialize the lost, they create bubbles just to get rich while the americans get riped off, go worry about your own country, america this is 21st cen, China is the Boss

  • @obsidianstatue

    I guess you chinks are totally stupid. India is much smarter than you chinks eating dogs and cats everyday how sick. US is never going to died because there is freedom, liberty, patriotism, and rights in this country. Your country china history is totally stupid. Mao Zedong and his communist government murder 50-70 million people working in the farm. How Fucking Stupid type government is that. He even banned martial arts and movie about Kung Fu. Hong Kong was freedom city.

  • @SilentEagles

    u know that "eating dog and cats" is not true ?!

    i think chinese food is much mory healthier than ur fast food

  • @obsidianstatue

    China Communist / Stalinist / Dictatorship is going end up dead like the Soviet Union. Your a fucking dumbass criticism of wall street, privatize proft, socialize, dollars, and everything. Your totally dumb. Your just jealous of US. China doesn't have freedom, democracy, liberty, patriotism, and rights. US going teach China a lesson how they did to Soviet Union. The second red nation China is going end into torn nation into states. Take That Bitch!

  • @obsidianstatue

    Also Go Fuck somewhere chinks. Your country China are totally disgusting full tons of male more than female fucking gay nation. Your country is full of populated up in the air. Your country China is fucking disgusting eating dogs and Cats. Your country could only make Kung Fu movies that is getting old get over it. Boring Chinese matrial arts is getting old. While Japan, South Korea, Brazil, Thailand, Israel, Russia, and other nation martial arts are still New.

  • @obsidianstatue

    Chinese guy and girls look fucking ugly look hideous fucking digusting wannabe mummies from Egypt. HA! China lost more causalities in the history than any nation. Your country China is fucking Suck! Your countries doesn't have good foods, music, arts, no multi religion, no different nation culture, and other like other nations. China are disgusting nation eating Dog and Cats everyday how sick.

  • @obsidianstatue

    I also know one thing how you Chinese also sick twisted disgusting people. Chinese people are digusting picking up dead hmong dead bodies from graveyard and eat it. You also turn their bodies into medicines and take their clothing. I know everything about Chinese secrets you can't hide it forever.

  • @obsidianstatue

    Yeah thats right I shut you up. You can't even reply back chinks still eating dogs and cats. hahahaha

  • @obsidianstatue are you retarded? age of carriers is over? you said that about tanks...dumb fuck...if the age of carriers is over, then what do the US use right now? and China doesnt even have ONE carrier yet...get your facts straight before acting stupid on the Internet kid

  • I would also glad if US sell Taiwan CBU-97 SFW. The CBU-97 can't destroyed 40 ground war machines targets. The 40 Skeets scan an area of 1,500 feet (460 m) by 500 feet (150 m) using infrared and laser sensors until it finds a target, or failing that, self-destructs 50 feet (15 m) above the ground. These weapons is safe it doesn't killed civilians. If it can't find targets it will self destruction in 50 fts.

  • I would glad if Taiwan buy M1A2 SEP/TUSK Abrams, M60 2000, K21, M142 HIMARS, Stryker variants, M1117, K9 Thunder, Rotem KW2, AH-64D Apache Longbow Block 3, CH-47F, UH-60M, MEADS, THAAD, M-ATV, Buffalo MPV, RG-33L, M777A2, F-16E/F, F-15SE, F-35, 737 AEW&C, upgraded E-2C to E-2D, M252, M120, FGM-148 Javelin, SMAW RPG, M16A4, M4 SOPMOD Block 1/2, Mk 48 Mod 1, M240L, Dragonskin body armor, Kriss Super V, AA-12 Shotgun, & weapons from US and South Korea to defeat PLA military.

  • The F-15SE and F-16E/F could carry advance electrol optical. The Taiwanese air force also need new AWACS like 737 AEW&C. The 737 AEW&C is better than PLA KJ-2000. The 737 AEW&C use MESA (Multirole Electronically Scanned Array) radar is better than L-band radar use by KJ-2000. The 737 could track more targets and more range than KJ-2000. The KJ-2000 is too fat and too slow so it could easily shot down. While 737 is fast and less weight and get out of the area a lot faster.

  • .........

  • 我很好奇打到一半如果沒油了怎麼辦

  • 台灣的戰車好癈,中共99式坦克的設備先進過你們的Cm-11 屎虎戰車

  • 懷念一下裝甲部隊的生活吧~各位同梯的

  • 日本人在亞洲 除了本國以外 只尊敬三個人:

    1. 鄭成功

    2. 蔣介石

    3. 李登輝

    

  • 台灣只要買潛艦 中共攻台即無勝算

  • Taiwanese Army new equipments for them: -MBT:(M1A2 SEP v 1/2 & M60-2000) -APC:(Stryker & M1117) -IFV:(K21 & EFV) -Self Propelled Artillery:(M109A6 PIM or K9 Thunder) -Towed Artillery:(M777A2) -Armour Fighting Vehicle:(M-ATV & RG-33) -SPAAG:(Rotem KW2, K-SAM, & K-30) -Tank Destroyer:(Stryker MGS) -Attack Helicopter:(AH-64D Apache Longbow block 3) -Transport Helicopter:(UH-60M & CH-47F) -MLRS:(M270A1, M142, or K-MLRS)
  • @SilentEagles when China unify taiwan the first wave of attack wont be airborun invasion.the first wave of attack will be saturated missile attack plus EMP electonic attack to disable sensors etc. then it will be and assult from PLAAF, and then airbourn special forces to mountainous areas to engage in commando missions, while the main body of assult will be seabourn..

  • @obsidianstatue

    The PLAAF planes and ballistic missiles will get shot down easily by MEADS, PAC-3, THAAD, HUMRAAM, and SL-AMRAAM. The PLA Army and Marines ground war machines would be whipped out by CBU-97 SFW dropping from B-2. US Navy Seals, Delta Force, Green Berets, Army Rangers, MARSOC, and Seal Team 6 would totally kick PLA special forces or commandos butts.

  • @SilentEagles if america come to interfere then China made world ONLY DF-21D ASBM(DoD calls it the aircraft carrier killer range 2000km with MaRVs and america has no weapon that can defend its fleet against it) and Chinese anti ship cruise missile plus torpedos from super quiet diesel electric sub WILL saturated any american carrier group defence. this is the strategy called sea-denial. there is nothing america can do except sending in some F-22s

  • @obsidianstatue

    HA! Your ballistic missiles will get destroyed and won't get scratch on US aircraft carriers. The F-22, F-35, F-15E, F-15C, F-16C/D, F-18E/F, and B-1B would destroyed it in the air by firing ALHKT. watch?v=OnVHEmROaMM. China anti ship missiles or cruise missiles are useless. I guess your stupid that you don't realize that USN Aircraft carriers does have protection. The USN AC have 2x 21 cell RIM-116 block 2, 2x SeaAMRAAM, & 1x Gatling Gun to destroyed your missiles.

  • @obsidianstatue

    Oh Please! Your submarines won't be much quiet and invisible you moron. USN new Multi-Mission Maritime Aircraft the P-8 Poseidon could find your submarine in the deep water that your subs is trying to hide. So China military doesn't stand a chance against US military. Your Fucking dumbass. Know your enemy you fucking dumbass. watch?v=x-qCWHm4BQM and watch?v=4MlxvKPTqHM. The P-8 carry next generation Sensors & Communications to find your invisible subs. PLA Navy are weak.

  • @obsidianstatue

    China doesn't have the balls to attack and invade Taiwan and US. You know why you drop the balls. China know if they attack Taiwan. China going get pay for it and suffer the consequences of US military power mights. US military power could a lot of damage to the PLA military. USAF is powerful than PLAAF. US Army and Marines are stronger, better weapons, stronger war machines, and better training than PLA Army and Marines. USN have advantage over PLA Navy.

  • @obsidianstatue

    Too bad China doesn't have or not finish these stuff:

    -Aircraft Carriers-still working on it.

    -No 5th Gen. Stealth Fighter Aircraft.

    -Doesn't have a SAM to shot down 5th Gen. Stealth aircraft like B-2, F-22, & F-35. US does have a SAM which called MEADS.

    -PLA Army and Marines doesn't wear body armor vest so they could easily get killed. They only wear flat jackets that carried magazines. Lame totally no protections.

  • @SilentEagles oh and you forgot how China likes to brag how its fighters can finally match the F-16...

    ....the F-16 is 20 year old technology XD

  • @sirtyeson1

    HA! Yeah I remember that how China is still brag about US supplying F-16 to Taiwan. See the reason why China is afraid of F-16 because F-16 totally knock out the PLAAF aircraft out of the sky. The F-16 is fast, maneuverable, and dodge the PLA SAM and AAA systems.

  • @SilentEagles yea but what sucks is that those F-16s are As and Bs...AND Taiwan only has about 150 of them in service..Taiwan desperately needs the sale of the F-16 Cs and DS

  • @sirtyeson1

    They need F-16E/F Super Viper instead of F-16C/D. The F-16E/F could take on J-10B Vigorous Dragon and FC-1 Fierce Dragon. They also need the F-15SE Silent Eagle. The F-15SE could change from internal configuration to external configuration of carrying AAM, AGM, Bombs, Anti Ship / Cruise missiles, and other weapons. The F-16E/F and F-15SE could carry targeting pod, jamming pods, Inferred Search and Targets pod. The F-15SE could take on J-11BS Sino Flanker.

  • @SilentEagles lol you are just an idiot, who knows shit about warfare.the S-300PMU2 is already good enough to takw down the F-22. onlyy idiot like you look at tactical weapons, while really its the strategic weapons like DF-21D ASBM that wins wars against a strong enemy. and not to mention USA is relying on the CHinese economy. this is not the cold war, China and america is too interconnected tobe fighting over taiwan, plus the PLA's abiility to have sea denial USA will NEVER interfare.

  • @obsidianstatue

    Your a fucking dumbass. You have no proof S-300PMU2 could take down F-22 Raptor that is why your a dumbass. HA! PLA Navy is afraid of US Navy entering in strait of Taiwan because US Navy have aircraft carrier. Your a fucking dumbass. The age of tanks and aircraft carriers is not passed away dumbass. Your a fucking dumbass again. China is the boss. What a joke! China is slavery nations. Your just jealous of US because they have freedom, liberty, patriotism, and rights. China dont

  • @SilentEagles im not keen on starting an discussion with an idiot, so I will let u be. China can easily sink an america fleet by saturating its defence using DF-21D torpedo and antiship cruise misslie. I will let u be an idiot, after all its really funny :)

  • @obsidianstatue thats it? You think American technology is that simple compared to Chinas? you must be really retarded..Anmerican technology is WAYYY more superior than Chinas..

  • @obsidianstatue Yea so Chinas growing...that doesnt stop the US from supporting Taiwan...because of the Taiwan Relations Act -1979, the US is bound to help Taiwan if it gets attacked and give it enough arms to ward off attacks

  • @obsidianstatue

    ReTarded! Whatever loser your just one big dumbass chinks eating dogs and cats everyday. If you hate America then your using youtube and google since US is the one create it dumbass. Don't bother posting comments and sending messages otherwise I would deleted your dumb comments.

  • Taiwan really need new Tanks! They also need new Armour Personal Carrier, Infantry Fighting Vehicles, Self Propelled Artillery, Towed Artillery, Armour Fighting Vehicles, and others for their troops.

  • all these old tanks.... taiwan is an island... it need missiles and navy wuts tanks doing on a tiny island o-O...

  • Taiwan's Army need a new tank to replace M60A3. The M60A3 doesn't stand a chance against China Type 96A/G & Type 99A2/KM. US could supply Taiwan the M60-2000 SEP v1/2 and also the M1A2 SEP v1/2.

  • @SilentEagles i dont see why would taiwan want tanks. its usless in taiwanese terrain. China invading taiwan WILL have air-supremacy so tanks are only slow moving targets for the PLAAF. this is not world war 2 the age of tanks has passed.

  • @obsidianstatue

    The age of tanks battle is not over yet. China will invade Taiwan by their PLA Navy and Marines from their mainland across strait of Taiwan to Taiwan mainland. They will drop in Tanks, APC, IFV, AIFV, Self Propelled Artillery, & other ground war machines. PLA military planes would easily shot down by US made PAC-3 SAM. China attack Taiwan then US will response massive military counter attack. US Navy Ships Armada & sky warrior of USAF will do a lot of damage to PLA military.

  • @SilentEagles stupid, China has 1500 ballistic missiles custum made for destroying taiwan, 240 of them will completly desable taiwanese airports military/civilian. all 4th generation fighters sycj as J-10 or J-11 has evasive techneque and technology to activly and passivly destory incomming SAMs. also China has already has the design of PAC-3 we got it from israel, combine pac-3 with Russian S-300=Chinese made HQ-9.

  • @obsidianstatue

    Too bad for Chinese ballistic missiles it will get shot down easily by upgraded PAC-3. China J-11 and J-10 will easily get shot down by F-22 and F-15E that deployed in Guam. USAF B-2 Spirit would whipped out your Air defense systems and military base on the grounds. US aircraft carriers and their aircraft would scare away your PLA Navy and Marines. HA! Chinese haven't finish up their aircraft carriers. China not have 5th Gen. Stealth fighter aircraft. PLA military doesn't stand.

  • @SilentEagles That obsidianstatue talks like a 5 year old...and what do we know about 5 year olds? They believe everything they read on the internet...Honestly..the age of tank is over..the US uses tanks in Iraq and Afghanistan to support infantry...this guy needs to get his facts straight

  • Comment removed

  • @sirtyeson1

    Sorry about comments forget about it. I thought you were talking bad about me. So I apologize.

  • @SilentEagles its too late to apologize...no im just kidding but yea i agree with yu on the part that the age of tanks isnt over but one of the reasons why Taiwan doesnt upgrade its weapons is money and the US doesnt want angry responses from the PRC...just like the recent sale of arms to Taiwan

  • @sirtyeson1

    China can't do anything to Taiwan. China know if they invade Taiwan they will end getting their butt kicked by US military. China can't stop trading with US other wise China economy will go bad to worst. Also China can't throw away and replace US dollars other US going sell advance weapons, hardware, technology, and war machines to Taiwan. China would then get piss off. China can't do anything to US and Taiwan.

  • chinas military has terrible logistics, an invasion of Taiwan would spark a counter attack from all of free asia, choking chinas supply routes and air corridors

  • @xChevyx350x who will counter attack, China has air-supremacy agaisnt most of its neighbours, and not to mention any plane taking off on island of taiwan will be in range of Chinese air-defence missiles and not to mention China has the electronic warfare supremacy over taiwan, if americans and japs come we will saturate their fleets and air force with our missiles, Chinese made and world ONLY DF-21D ASBM is a good missile to sink american and jap fleets.

  • 你們要小心...你們這麼喜歡用黑心貨,,,我們超想你們打來的­..黑心飛彈的膛炸我們等著笑......

  • LOL listen to that guy puppet to fat america?and slave to master japan? HAHAHA wow where u read that up?this the free world your talking about without it we cant have open minds or even give our opinions about our own govertments can the ppl of china pr do that? In laos u cant they still have secret police and secret prisons where they can arrest u with their secret hand cuffs

  • @a96736001 Fuck YOU!!!

  • 僕你個臭街台

  • Those M60s won't stand a lasting chance against China's massive airforce and China's new MBTs.

  • 樓下大大說得好~~~  +1

  • 呵~原來是烏崁連~線在裝備比我那時好多了~當初是在雞母塢~M­41還沒辦法邊跑邊射擊......好久遠的記憶阿.

  • Good to see that Free Taiwan is still willing to stand strong against tyranny. Ignore what Obama says- the US will never abandon a free nation to the vicious tyranny of the butchers of Tienanmin Square. One bit of advice-scrap the .50 caliber cupola at the commanders hatch. Israelis discovered that it tended to sheer off and cut the TC in half if the tank turret took a solid hit, even if the turret wasn't penetrated. That's a mighty rough way for the gunner to be promoted.