Added: 3 years ago
From: benwl
Views: 124,337
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (512)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • This is one very "tasteless" video. =p

  • xDDD

  • Your vid went viral on Concord

  • Ded gamnit. Everybody!

  • ded gamnit

  • -Oh god damn it ..

    -Jack smith have a few problems?...xDDD

  • I dont know if there is sound in space to hear the bucket fall, or why he is hanging from wires like something from Team America, but it is clear that some people actually still believe this, which I never fail to be impressed by.

    Never underestimate the power of denial

  • @itsreddersinhell You're a moron.

  • @itsreddersinhell you hear the bucket fall because he put his foot under the bucket when it falls. So the sound of the bucket hitting his suit is heard in the microphone.

  • Aww, you hoaxsters are SO CUTE there with your little neurons starting to fire for the very first time!

    Goochy, goochy, goo!

  • Those suits are probably made out of a very strong fabric. As far as I know if there's only a minor leak in the suit, you're dead immediately. These guys are falling, kicking rocks and stuff, all with a suit not much thicker than a few inches. I'd shit myself with every move I'd make out there :p

  • @babyCreative

    It didn't matter to them.

    They were safe in Nevada when they filmed their "moonlanding"

  • @babyCreative I do not believe a tiny leak would be immediate death... but you wouldn't have much time either. And it is Kevlar. So I think they are pretty safe from falling on rocks. Now the visor is the scary part.

  • actually around 6 seconds it look slike hes hanging off the wires and that caused him to fall.

  • Something wrong here. When that bucket fail, you can here its thud, I thought there was no sound in space.

  • @VTwinty You had me worried there for a second when you said this :D But it's okay: He tries to 'stop' it from falling by putting his foot under it (like we've all done when we drop something). So the case hits his suit, which is filled with air, which then carries the soundwaves. That's what you hear :)

  • @babyCreative Thank you. ^^

  • @40390576 Do some reading. 10 austronauts that were involved in the missions have died MYSTERIOUSLY.

    A few austronauts that actually are still alive say it´s impossible for them to have done the trip.

    GO FIGURE. But i guess that day air was present on the moon.

  • @40390576 Radiation gets incredibly strong the further away from the earth you get.

    The earth´s magnetic field helps to keep some of that away.

  • *cracks helmet*

    Astronaut:FUUUUUUUUUUUUUU!!!!!­!!!

  • I find it hilarious that there is a click right as the object falls and he kicks it, I just filled this in as the camera recording the sound of the lid slamming shut. And then I was like, wait.... it's the moon, no atmosphere, hence no sound.

  • I want the Moon landing hoaxers to explain to me how they tied guide wires to all those particles of dust that defy the laws of gravity here on earth???

  • @atomicwave Dig up Stanley and he can tell you, oh I'm afraid his secrets went with him, TO THE GRAVE.

    LOLzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz.

  • @atomicwave One of the best questions to the hoaxnuts. And untill now I have not received one answer. Another questions would be: How did they manage to circuit each other? How did they manage crosspaths? Why the hell did they fall, when they are supported by wires?

    ;)

  • @CHSarahBs You will not get an answer to those questions, they are the result of intelligent thinking something hoaxnuts dont do.

  • @musicbruv I know ;)

  • @CHSarahBs How did they survive the radiation in space that would kill them in a heartbeat?

    They survived it because they never really went. Russia knew this and that´s why you have never seen them walk on the moon and the reason there has been only 2 manned missions to the moon.

    1. was to beat russia

    2. was to confirm it was not a fluke

    3. It was all faked.

  • @GeneralRushHour first of all, there were 6 manned missions to the moon. Second, you really think if the Russians knew of this radiation that they would be scrutinizing every little detail about our trips. If they found something, they would have been blabbering their mouths off.

    The only reason I see why people believe we didn't go to the moon is either they're anti-American or are still stuck in the medieval times about what our race can accomplish. Or both.

  • @louielouie11224 All faked...

    Notice it was 40 years ago. My cellphone has more power then all of NASA back then.

    IT´s impossible for them to have went to the moon and landed.

    Medieval times? Yea the 70´s were just that....

  • @CHSarahBs "Why the hell did they fall, when they are supported by wires?"

    LOL

    the give away is not in there but the way that they get up after falling!!!

  • @Nostro200 "The way they get up..."?

    Haven't you hoaxers had enough of all this crap yet?

    He is obviously getting up that way because the gravity is much lower and therefore he will appear to be "floating" for a few milliseconds.

  • @atomicwave SLOW MOTION can do wonderful things.

  • @GeneralRushHour I'm a physics major. That means I STUDY Physics at a university. Slow motion can not break the laws of physics.

  • @atomicwave Then you should really study the tapes and watched the fast forward clips.

    It is obvious that the guys are jumping around, flag is waving like hell and sand reacts like it should here on earth.

  • @GeneralRushHour You should really take a class or two.

  • @atomicwave And you should really study the other side and then you will realise that there are ALOT of fishy things.

  • Comment removed

  • @GeneralRushHour Your fishy thing theories are invalid. I suppose you haven't heard of the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter have you? Heard about the photographs it's sent back?

    Keep playing your video games and leave the moon to scientists who actually have an opinion based on FACT and not lunacy.

  • @atomicwave Why fake images in the first place. 

  • @GeneralRushHour Please stop replying, I'm tired of seeing your name in my inbox.

  • @atomicwave

    well...1 thing I know for 100% sure is that you would SUCK at making a hoax like this...

    WIRES? hahaha

    they used SAND!!!

    are we clear?

  • @Nostro200 I was being sarcastic you fucktard.

    OH SAND! I FORGOT THAT SAND BROKE THE LAWS OF GRAVITY! HOW SILLY OF ME!!!

  • @atomicwave

    I dont see any laws of gravity being broken!

    and if there are, thell me where

  • @Nostro200 the dust is not behaving like the dust would on Earth. On the video you can see that the dust falls back to the surface very quickly because there's no air on the moon to retain the dust/sand in the air. Just go outside and throw a bunch of dirt in the air, you will see that the dust and sand will take a while to fall down because the air is slowing it down.

  • @atomicwave I can do that for the hoaxers, so they won't need to:

    "lol y'all hoaxsters ain't gettin' anything they tied the sand particles in separate wires lolol Nasa monkeys fool world."

    Which obviously sounds like complete bullshit, just like all other hoax crap. =D

  • @atomicwave but they didn't, look at them fall back to the ground at 0:04

  • @CloneTrooperKieran I think what he's trying to say is. Watch how slow they fall back to the moons surface. dust and dirt fall down to earth much faster than that because of gravity. Use your brain a bit more.

  • @atomicwave The dust looks like it has air, to suspend itself in.

    I could do this in my dirt driveway in Maryland, in the soft powder so fine from the tires crushing it over & over.

    There are no stars, planets or Milky Way visible.

    PLSS would have to jet out steam, to keep astronaut cool.

    He is supposedly hundreds of thousands of kilometers from home baking in radiation, with limited lifesupport. Any damage would be fatal.

    Astronaut dialog and movement, is bogus in the extreme.

  • @atomicwave hahaha good one. maybe slowing the video down would cause that effect idiot..

  • "but, but, but...! what about that? The flag is moving around, wow it's a hoax!"

    "but, but, but...! what about the stars...? There are NO stars! Wow it's a hoax!"

    "So... I really AM smaaather than all those sciencetits.... right?"

  • I have to say looking at this video the way the dust falls has got to be in a vaccum and unless they were able to create a vaccum in an entire film studio then it would suggest that the Apollo missions did indeed land on the moon .Anyone who ever saw dust kicked up would surely agree it is suspended in the air for a short time .I am no expert and always willing to listen to argument ...........

  • its like qwop

  • Anyone who STILL believes they went to the moon is a luna-tic who like Jack will fall for anything.

    LOL.

  • @Mrscot148

    Try giving one (1) ounce of evidence that the Moon landings were faked.

  • and this is why you shouldn't take up binge drinking

  • help! Iv fallen and I cant get up!

  • Meanwhile the aliens watching all this are laughing their butt off

    Silly Humans

  • After all you tried to get osama and instead you got an obama. Simply a matter of changing a letter!

    If you get tired of obama then you could always get W back in.

    YEEEEEEEEEEEEEHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA­AAAAAAAA!

  • @Mrscot148

    Most people are smart enough to believe credentialed scientists and engineers or do some study and understand most of Apollo and the Moon landings.

    Only some are so ignorant and think they outsmart those scientists and engineers and base their 'knowledge' on some YouTube clips or delusional paranoia.

  • @Rob260259 Which category do you fall into?

    Make a stand, or like the poor astronut you may fall for it two!!

    LOL.

  • The Apollo Program is an historic event. What individuals do or rather want to believe about it is irrelevant in all objectivity. Credo quia absurdum - Belief is an irrational effort of will and does belong to subjectivity. In context of the Apollo Program, the opinion of average Joe does not matter historically and less than ever scientifically. Besides, what's particularly weird is that hoaxheads claim anyone with an understanding of science could easily see through NASA's lies.

    (cont)

  • @Rob260259 The apollo program is an historical event, your opinion is only as important to another as far as they comment to either agree or disagree with it.

    The light of the truth stands whether you agree with it or not.

    The truth is not subjective unless you are an atheist.

    If you are an atheist, then you have set yourself up as your own god and are ruled by your own set of absolute morals.

    The big problem is when your set of absolutes conflicts with another's.

    In that case who's right?.

  • @Mrscot148

    "your opinion"

    - That's just what it's all about. It's not my opinion. It's a solid fact, acknowledged by real scientists. Unlike the fools here at YouTube making conspiracy videos.Many of them seldom provide explanation, substance, or methodology. Many of these hoaxers appear to be presenting topics that have been dealt with by others, in great detail.

  • @Rob260259 Let me explain it to you. Your opinion is based on the facts that you CHOOSE to look at.

    You CHOOSE to take notice of facts that best line up with what you believ. You then CHOOSE to reject the rest.What is your authority and what does it align itself to? It is subjective at best. If you say to me,the facts I base my belief on is that common line of the so called scientists and authorities. Well if you travel your whole life based on their facts, then you are a pleb.

  • @Mrscot148

    Let me explain it to you.

    There is no choice. You can't argue on 2 + 2 = 4. However... may be you do.

  • @Rob260259 Your simplicity astounds me, tried anything difficult in your life like God?

  • @Mrscot148

    God? What is that?

  • @Mrscot148

    Thank God this debate only takes place on the internet. No serious, educated scientist has ever doubted the validity of the Apollo program. The shuttle was far more sophisticated than the Apollo program and it lasted for 30 years, having been designed by the many of the people who built apollo. To call the moon landings fake is anti-American, subversive, ignorant, retarded, and so on. Even the Soviets knew it was real and they were our enemies.

  • @Rob260259 I think what your own pres and authorities do to you yanks is even more subversive.

    No scientist can say anything contrary to the official line of else they will lose credibility.

    You have no credibility because you do not and can not address my questions.

    Its always the same, retreat into your stupid flag and bleed patriotism.

    Hail the chief.

    You do realize your pres is still subject to the Queen of England.

    Look up your constitution.

    You killed more of each other in the civil war.

  • @Mrscot148

    "to you yanks"

    - Huh..? You're unable to do even the most basic research...

  • @Mrscot148

    Again:

    Try to find one (1) ounce of proof that supports your ridiculous theory about the Moon landings.

  • @Mrscot148

    Fake the Apollo program?

    - Thousands of photographs had to have been all faked, by a team that created a filmset, lit it and ensured perfect continuity.

  • @Mrscot148

    Fake the Apollo program?

    - over 100 hours of footage had to have been all faked. In many cases this has several hours of continuity.

  • @Mrscot148

    Fake?

    - a specialist team would need to fake the footage shots in space using models that would look realistic. Realistic enough to no only fool the public, but scientists, engineers and all the Soviets monitoring as well. The footage had to reflect Lunar gravity, without continuity errors and perfectly lit.

  • @Mrscot148

    All the people who faked the photography and videos would have to keep quiet or had to be silenced.

    A team of people had to have written all the scripts for many hundreds of hours of footage both in transit and on the surface of the Moon. And they would need to keep quiet about it.

  • @Mrscot148

    - All the Moon rocks would need to have been collected or 'manufactured'. If collected from the Moon, technology would need to be created to collect and return the rocks without human intervention. The 'manufactured' rocks would have needed 'Zap pits' from impacts of micro meteorites, not showing any sign of moisture, Earth gravity or atmospheric entry burning.

  • @Mrscot148

    - NASA would need to fool every single geologist who examined the rocks and dust. Or all these geologistst would have been in on it. All the people involved in collecting or forging would have need to keep quiet.

  • @Mrscot148

    - all the telemetry and signals would need to be faked, for the duration of all missions. A specialized team to write this all would have been needed.

    - all the radio transmissions would have been faked. All the radio amateurs tracking Apollo would have been in on the hoax. To fake these highly directional signals, a signal coming from the Moon and a signal from an orbiting craft would have been needed.

  • @Mrscot148

    If the laser reflectors were put there by a probe or a robot, all personell involved would have need to keep silent or lying.

    - all the scientists using the reflectors are stupid and easily fooled. Or have been lying for the past 41 years. Or brainwashed ofcourse.

    - anyone spilling the beans would have been silenced. Uhh.. by who? And who would silence the killers..?

  • @Mrscot148

    Please explain why NASA, knowing that other countries in the near future would image the landing sites with LRO's resolution or better, try to continue to perpetrate a moon hoax after 40 years? That is equivalent not only to shooting yourself in the foot, but doing it twice.

  • @Rob260259 It is not about perpetuating the lie, nor proving a theory or event nor disproving it, the substance is in the Authority of your truth or witness. What is your Authority. What do base YOUR belief on?

    When Pilate asked Christ,"What is truth", what was Christ's response?

    Reply!

  • @Mrscot148

    So you can't explain.

    I base my conclusions (it's not a belief) on educated and credentialed people who DO know what they are talking about. And of course, a lot of research. Not just some high school drop outs making YouTube videos or some kind of Twoofer. May be that is the difference between you and me....

    Again: don't say "fake" because you don't understand science and engineering.

  • @Rob260259 Listen my friend if you can't answer a little question as I have asked you in my last reply then you are invalid and live according to the LIE.

    Your authority has no authority so don't reply if you cannot answer my question and believe in the LIE.

    Answer my question concerning Christ and I will reply.

  • @Mrscot148

    I gave you a lot of answers. Just try them out. And read some books about physics. It might work. Get rid of your pigeon-hole science.

  • @Mrscot148

    Oh, and I am NOT your friend. Just like I am NOT a yank. Check your 'observations'.

  • @Mrscot148

    Most people are smart enough to believe reputable engineers, physicists, geologists, astronomers and astronauts from across the globe who state that the landings were a fact. But no, the real conspiracists believe some anonymous high-school dropouts who found everything they needed to conclude the Apollo program was a hoax from some distorted YouTube videos. It's kind of fascinating...

  • @Rob260259 One of your comments ended up in spam.

    Need I say more?

  • @Mrscot148

    It's called usance (French, I guess?). Many hoax heads push the spam button regularly.

    Which comment btw?

  • @Mrscot148 refering to bible = instant fail

  • "damned beavis, fucked moon in cant stay up!"

    "oh yeah!"

    "damn!this shits fall i will take iiiiiiiiitttttt whooooaaa...."

  • Why is the dust flying like it's in the air? There shouldn't be any shadows either.

  • @battledawnfan Explain yourself. You can kick dust up in a vacuum, it will follow a parabolic arc.

    There are shadows because of the sun.

  • The thumbnail for this video is freakin hilarious

  • Now that looked real skeptics cant argue that

  • If you want proof that idiocy and stupidity still rule mankind, read these ridiculous posts that America faked the landings and walks on the moon.

  • Schmitt: Aww! Dag gummit.....!

    Other astronaut: Jack Schmitt having a few problems

  • man i use to live a few houses away from charlie duke about 10 years ago. he told me some pretty cool shit about the missions. i wonder if he's still alive, i oughta go pay him a visit... whose with me? :D

  • Soviet russia's verion of Zelda majora's mask.

  • I personally think the strange moving at the end could have been that be accidently pushed himself with his arm and the low gravity made him move that way?

  • @Hamptoncltn Wires, wires and slow motion

  • @DevinFilms66792 How the fuck does someone fall over when they are suspended by a wire? Do you even think before you say things?

  • @krisdevalle Actually I do, Imagine taking a fishing pole, and dangle it, the bait will move in the exact same way the astronaut is, now just take that in Slow Motion, there you go. Pay attention to his backpack when he 'gets back up' you'll realize something

  • @krisdevalle Also, he moves in a very VERY unnatural way.

  • @DevinFilms66792 Perhaps as if he is in 1/6th gravity? That might be it. Have you ever seen anyone move around on the moon before?

  • @krisdevalle if that were true, the why does the dust fall back down, surely it would drift off into space because its so light, if we went to the moon, the why didn't any sattilite take pictures of the landing? If we went to the moon, how did we get live streaming FROM the moon lander which was about 3 days away from Earth back in 69 when technology like that didn't exist. Neil may have went to space, but he never landed on the moon, it was a cover up to win over the Russians

  • @DevinFilms66792 The dust falls because there is no air for it to float in. The moon's gravitational acceleration constant is 1.6m/s2.

    The Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter has now imaged all the landings sites as well as other unmanned probes, including Soviet rovers.

    Radio&TV travels from the moon at the speed of light, taking 1.2 seconds to reach Earth. It is ridiculous of you suggest that this technology did not exist when you clearly did not check to see if it did. You can check all my facts.

  • @krisdevalle never answered about the satillites, and plus, I looked at the model landing video where they were testing, looked exactly like the landing in 69. Plus on some parts of that feed you'd see some light flashing above Neil's head. I have 3 cds of the moon landing and I've watched them all. Its what Nasa didn't show the public.

  • @DevinFilms66792 No satellite took pictures of the landing because no telescope has the resolution to view objects that small at that distance.

    Obviously if we did have telescopes to do this, then would have photos. In the meantime, a satellite orbiting the moon that arrived last year now has photos of the landing sites.

    If you are talking about 'lights' about Neil's head, as if they are wires, then I must ask why NASA would be so stupid as to use shiny wires?

  • @krisdevalle I don't know, why would they only show 20 seconds of them looking at Earth from a distance? Surely NASA would want the world to see it was real.

  • @DevinFilms66792 For most professional astronomers and spacefaring nations, the photographic evidence from famous images such as 'Earthrise' is proof enough, along with random other photographs that manage to get Earth in them from the lunar surface.

    I suggest you review a website called the 'Apollo Lunar Surface Journal' which contains every photograph, film sequence and mission report from all the lunar missions - 11, 12, 14, 15, 16 and 17. Plenty of shots of Earth there too.

  • @krisdevalle NASA had to use wires to hold the astronuts up when they fell over, which by the way is obvious even to a pre schooler, because the equipment was too heavy for them.

    Oh by the way, the wires only "shined" because Stanley Kubrick accidentally moved a light while they were shooting the scene. Because it was live they couldn't re shoot it.

    Some of you americans, and a small minority, will believe anything your government serves you up,which is why you are the most debt ridden nation.

  • @Mrscot148 Stanley Kubrick was shooting 'A Clockwork Orange' in the UK during these missions, and never used wires in his lunar sequences because he had no way of hiding any kind of wire the the lunar sequences due to the difference in contrast between the black sky and the light grey landscape.

    You don't even make sense. What equipment was too heavy? Surely they were props, if this was a hoax.

    That's obvious to a pre-schooler.

  • @Mrscot148 wow it's almost like he fell over cause the cable gave way and his backpack was suddenly too heavy...

    It's just amazing how the dust they kick up defies Earths gravity too

  • @Mattsretiring The dust particles were on wires, too. Hey, it is because I said so. Are you convinced? Oh pleeaaaaaaaaaaaaase ;)

  • so you cant see stars while you're on the moon...?

  • @KeanVindre Not on the sunlit side. Look at any of the HD footage from the space station and it looks the same way.

  • @krisdevalle oh, ya that makes sense. can't believe i forgot about that!

  • @ Hey look.. i'm the first man to fall on moon !!

  • I bet the aliens that were watching this huge mile stone for human kind were laughing their asses off when he fell

  • so fake

  • ohh dagummit

  • NASA believes we are stupid...

  • epic fall lol looks more like a jump though

  • add some sweet ass technomusic after 0:04 and you are set to go

  • There's no problem. The wires holding him up took care of that. Watch closely.....

  • sound on 0:01 strange... After 0:04 strange motion :D

  • They effed it up. We're talking the US government here. Sprawling, ineffective, bumbling at times. How many people in total were involved in Watergate? 12? 13? How many people would be required to pull this off if it was a fake? Thousands. Thousands of people with knowledge. 40 years later and not a single soul has leaked anything? No death bed confessions? No tell-all expose's? You're dreaming.

  • @ProtusMose Russia would be the first to expose it. USA did it fair n square. Time to get over it.

  • @ProtusMose Maybe we should ask the 10 austronauts that mysteriously died?

    There would only need to be a handful of people because not thousands of people are at the top.

    Those people did not know and did their job. NASA said themselves that the chance of going to the moon was 0.01%

    But still the austronauts survived radiation that would kill them instantly...

    FAKED MOONLANDING. Just as fake as 9/11 was an inside job. Only fools refuse to accknoledge it.

  • @GeneralRushHour. I'm about to do a BSc.(Psych) degree because of people like you. Some folks need to be dragged kicking & screaming into the modern era - we went to the moon, nuclear weapons do exist, the earth is round, and we no longer have to fear gods or witches.  Just curious, where are you getting this "lethal radiation" crap? The hoaxers have grabbed onto that like a drowning man grabs onto a floating log.

  • @baobubs I´m sure we went to the moon, not just with humans at that time.

    Great stuff. When you are done please read the NIST report, let me know if you find something strange with it.

  • THE MOON GAME: with euphoria

  • DAG GUMMIT!

  • porque a caixa não saiu voando já que não tem gravidade, e onde estão as estrelas?...kkkkkkkkkkkkk

  • I like how he Flies Foward, lol

  • It was drunken

  • lol the only professional scientist to walk on the moon and he falls all over the palce. xD

  • and that was the birth of breakdance, children!

  • I just about pissed myself when he said "dag gummit."

    Anyways, I'm sick and tired of all of these CTs saying that the astronauts took, "falling down on the moon too lightly, as the fall could have ruptured the suits." With all the stuff that NASA had to factor, I think they added "astronauts falling down on the moon" on their list of things to factor in. For crying outloud, those suits were 300+ LBS, I kind of doubt they would rupture easily.

  • jajajaja

  • a small fall for man, a giant plunge for mankind

  • see him get pulled backwards by some "outside force" at 0:07

  • @thearabmonster - you mean his muscles pushing off the surface with 1/6 gravity? The suits weighed about 212 pounds. I don't know Jack Schmitt's exact weight, but you can assume he came in at most 200 pounds. That's 412 pounds, in 1/6 gravity, for a total weight of 68.67 pounds. He could easily move himself like that. Put it another way, if a car has 200 hp and weighs 1 ton, it has 200hp/ton; a normal everyday car. Change the weight to 1/6 ton, and you get 1200hp/ton (twice a Veyron's).

  • @TG1212able gravity dosnt equal a weight differance the way you calculate it, gravity is measured in acceleration force, althoug your logic of the statement is correct

  • see him get pulled backwards by some "outside force" at 0:09

  • lolololololololol

    How embarassing... x)

  • @croHDGaming

    "God" told me you were targeted by "Him" to have down syndrome and be pointed and laughed at by everyone on the internet. He also told me to feel sorry for anyone human or comprehending species that ever had contact with you.

    P.s. "He" also said that if you didn't believe me, you'd be sinning. Thus your soul would be going to hell.

    Sorry, its not me, really, I'm just passing on a message here buddy.

    Also: You can't prove that "He" didn't come in contact with me about you. So smd.

  • He should have gotten life alert!

  • DAGGUMIT!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • This suit is real problem

  • @wdowa94 Now wonder. Remembering it was pressurized. So he has had a similarity with a Michelin-man (I hope you knwo what I mean ;)

  • hahahaha O:)

  • "dag gummit"

  • haha

  • hahaha Yes people your life is a lie. Why so sensitive? Everything you think you know is actually different. When I mean everything, I mean EVERYTHING. Dont ask me how I know I just know and you will someday.

  • @croHDgaming you high bro?

  • @croHDgaming "Everything you think you know is actually different. When I mean everything, I mean EVERYTHING. Dont ask me how I know I just know and you will someday"

    So you know it, and this means, it is acutally different ;)

  • could you imagine falling on the moon? it would take longer so it would go something like this:

    *walking walking TRIP*

    SHIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII­IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII­IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII­IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII­IIIIIIIIIIIT *thud*

  • how can someone see this and still believe its actually footage from the moon...Just look at the body movement; pupet on a rope? We deserve to be exterminated cus we are arguing about common sense... Yeah we have been to the moon and the earth is flat... o wait but its isnt. Well tell that to the how many souls that burned cus of that...

  • @croHDgaming the only soul burning is yours for being an idiot

  • @blmyou2b When truth finally reveals itself you will see that your whole life was a lie...

  • @croHDgaming my life already is a lie... that because i believed in god BRING ON THE HATE GOD LOVERS!!!

  • @croHDgaming bahahaha "when truth finally reveals itsefl" you're hilarious man. hey, bigfoot is real, when the truth finally reveals itself you will see that your whole life was a lie. hey, pokemon actually exist, when the truth finally reveals itself you will see that your whole life was a lie. the mormon's were right all along, when the truth finally reveals itself you will see that your whole life was a lie. you crack me up man with your hoax mumbo jumbo and this "life is a lie" shit

  • @croHDgaming Learning is fun, I suggest you do it.

  • @croHDgaming at least you're right about earth not being flat. the earth is actually your imagination which makes sense because earth is a really fucked up place.

  • @davisotj1 I heard some theories saying Earth is the worst place in the whole universe. Well when you clearly look at it (and I am talking about human lives not nature and animals), you can hardly imagine anything worse. There is so much chaos and suffering. So much suppression, so much control, imbalance. Only way you can survive is by being unconscious, ignoring your soul, ignoring your own suffering and suffering of others... Well I still think one day will shine if we do our best. PEACE

  • @croHDgaming Because some people bothered to get an education, other like you spend your time ranting about things you don't even begin to understand.

  • @bibbler227 Yeah education like whats the cause of gravity... Hey wait a minute, there isnt any explanation yet, scientist are still trying to find "god particle" by smashing atoms at huge speeds...Hey wait a minute,they still havent pulled that of, maybe thats because there isnt any atoms with electrons, there are only frequencies, everything is an illusion of motion,a motion caused by thinking mind. Back to gravity...Einstein theory? Curving of space? LMFAO... Live on in your imagination...

  • a small fail for man, a huge fail for mankind

  • @maurin lolz

  • @maurin nice joke but this is a scary moment bcause his space suit colud of riped open

  • @maurin Look MA no hands! Aren't they the same puppets and strings that they used in the Thunderbirds series!

    Who's playin the hood, osama or obama, to be continued!

  • Comment removed