How sad... when someone is banned, all their comments are deleted automatically. Halloweennight, I didn't mean to ban you from commenting on this video - just from another video of mine. Here, I'll repost for you: "your mother hated u". Feel better now?
@mikenotnumberone1 "what" bothered me exactly? This video was made a long time ago. Antivaxers post videos all the time mocking people they don't agree with, and I find it funny that they can't bear to have their own foibles thrust into public scrutiny.
@sweetalker79 I am not interested in your lengthy excuses. so if one guy pulls a gun on you innocently..will you return the favor and do it to someone else for no reason? This is the biggest waste of time I got to laugh at since I drove bferg over a cliff screaming help.
@mikenotnumberone1 I'll say it one more time: If you are NOT zowafflesidekickcunt, then you have nothing to worry about and no reason to still be here. Your name is NOT on this video. Nowhere on this video does it say "mikenotnumberone1 = zowafflesidekickcunt".
The fact that you're still here, whining about how this video hurts your widdle feelings, looks awfully suspicious to anyone reading your posts.
@sweetalker79 oh pussy shut up..what you spam or ban is reality..youre a worthless twerp who cannot handle the truth. Making tribute videos of people? what a bizarre thing to do. you always try to spam people's comments..is that gonna change anything here? Show me a threat I made to you on this thread dummy! AHAHAHA Sweet issuing the "I am warning you" get a new sockpuppet account adn some glasses...show me where I threatened you
If you copy and paste a comment, it will come up as spam. Also if your comment matches or is similar to other comments, it might mark it as spam. Certain words are also filtered by YouTube.
@mikenotnumberone1 I said Bill Gates is not a doctor, a virologist, or any kind of scientist - all true things. He's offering life-saving technology to the poorer sections of the world and you suggest he stop - why?
Most people aren't "nuts", btw - they're just confused b/c of people like you screaming at them for believing in science.
@sweetalker79 What a fail! LOL zowaffle followed me into my friends pages and the sock account followed zo. apparently you cannot even click on a profile to determine this? Good work! This might be one of the funniest fails I have ever seen! Good reporting and a complete waste of time not showing all the facts! FAIL SWEET!
UFC Champion Andrei Arlovski: "I have a choice to step into the cage to fight, but these dogs have no choice. Dog fighting is morally wrong and inhumane. In my opinion it's torture."
UFC fighter Rob McCullough: "I choose to fight, but a lot of dogs don't get that choice. Dog fighting is not cool."
BTW, those vids your brother has? Just possessing them is illegal in most states - considered similar to child pornography.
To answer delitemyheart's query about why UFC fighting is legal and his beloved dogfighting is not:
A fighter dog is trained by being starved to the point of near-death, then fed ONLY when it slaughters "bait" kittens. The kitten's legs are often broken beforehand so that it can't scratch.
Acc. to U.S. federal investigators, "loving" owners will often "drown, strangle, hang, shoot, or electrocute" dogs that lose or get old.
I completely support making medicine better and safer for everyone. However, that doesn't mean arguing against current vaccines.
Vaccine makers DO have to pay for damages caused by vaccines. NVICP was created solely for that. The problems antivaxers have with it is that one actually has to PROVE the vaccines caused the damages. I find it disturbing that people seem to be the most upset because they can't sue anyone for anything and win.
As I said before, I'm all for making medicine and vaccines better all around. That doesn't mean we need to disgard everything we have now.
Compared to the BILLIONS of vaccines given each year, only a small amount of people are injured by them, and the injuries are usually allergic reactions. It is regrettable.
But EVERYTHING in existance has the potential for risk. If anti-vaxers were TRULY as concerned with preserving lives as they claim, then they should seek to ban automobiles.
A problem I have with most anti-vaxers is their completely irrational view points when it comes to vaccines. They rant and rave about the damage that may be inflicted by a vaccine (although the vast majority of what they're ranting about has nothing to do with vaccines other than a coincidence in timing) while completely ignoring the fact that without the vaccines many many more people would suffer and die.
Why is it that they think that a child developing autism (which has NEVER been linked to vaccines, btw, other than a coincidence in timing) is so much worse than children DYING from diseases that are easily avoidable?
Why is autism worse than death for these people?
Then you get into the whole psychotic conspiracy theory garbage that so many anti-vaxers believe that it's just sickening.
@Stumpy- again you use fear mongering, in generalizations. The FDA/CDC claim 36,000 died of the flu in 2008. But if you study the info at their websites you find the deaths are flu RELATED. They died of something else while it is ASSUMED they had the flu. Digging a little further, FDA/CDC admit the # of deaths is estimated. What's the truth? I don't know. Neither does the FDA or CDC
Then you revert to insulting "most antivaxers" as getting into the "psychotic conspiracy theory garbage"
Yes, 36,000 is an estimate. Some years its less, some years it's more. What exactly do you not understand about the definition of "estimate"? Do you think the exact same number of people should die each year for it to be valid?
No, they died of complications from the flu. Without the flu, they would not have died of the complications. The flu caused the complications.
Would you say that people don't die of car accidents but instead of complications due to car accidents?
@Stumpy- You use fear mongering to support your apparent agenda. You claim the "vast majority [of vaccine damages] [are] a coincidence in timing" & "[w/o] vaccines many more people would suffer & die". What references are you using to come up with these generalizations?
You say most "anti-vaxers" have "completely irrational view-points". Which people & what viewpoints?
The package inserts & VIT are clear that vax are linked to & CAUSE many injuries in kids. What's not clear is how many
What fear mongering have I used? I've provided solid stats to support what I say. What exactly have you provided?
The references I'm using is that most of the claims concerning vaccine damage I see argued here is in relation to autism. Childhood vaccines are given during the same time frame that autism can be detected. This is a coincidence in timing. There is NOTHING else that supports the vaccine/autism link other than A happened, then B happened, therefor A caused B.
@StumpyOuch You are ignoring what is in my posts to you and rambling about irrelevant things.
I'll deal with your "concidence in timing" claim & "nothing else supports the vaccine/autism link"
Vaccines are known to be linked to & cause dozens of neurological injuries in children. My references- Vaccine Injury Table, MMR package insert (there's MANY more)
Google- nellco autism - this is a law review study of 1000 children who were compensated for vax-caused brain injuries. 83 also are autistic
What exactly am I rambling about? I'm providing solid evidence to my claims. What am I ignoring in your posts? I'm responding post by post with specific evidence.
Vaccines have been known to cause some neurological injuries. I've never disputed that. It has NEVER been scientifically or medically proven to cause autism. Ever.
Oh, michael, it is you! I thought I recognized your argument skills.
@StumpyOuch Yep, it's definitely our old friend Mikey.
The same misspellings, leaving the period off the end of sentences, the rallying cry of "lies!" if something comes from a science journal, the hero worship of Bernadine Healy (a cardiologist, not virologist, who was forced to resign from the Red Cross b/c she asked people for donations after 9/11 then "forgot" to give them to the victims' families), and especially the insistence that anyone disagreeing with him is out to "hurt kids".
Well, at least he's dropped the "Two Studies!! Show me just two studies!!" crap that I listened to repeatedly for years. He'll probably start up again now that I mentioned it.
Don't forget the constant criticism of others for things that he's guilty of himself. For instance, constantly claiming that I provide no evidence for my claims.
Count the number of links I've provided. Then count his.
The nellco brief is not a medical study. It is not a scientific study. It's a review by lawyers based on the NVCIP.
As you very well know, in non omnibus vaccine procceedings, it is NOT necessary to prove scientifically or medically that vaccines cause autism. THis is the requirement to win a case in NVCIP claiming vaccines caused autism damage:
I'll also point out that if you're going with merely legal evidence to claim vaccines cause autism, the Omnibus Court ruled that there was NO vaccine-autism link.
Well damn, nevermind. My copy/paste from my inbox messed up and then sweet posted a response to me, replacing bristow/mike/moodybluez/about a dozen different other names' comments.
@Stump Again you lie. If a child's injury is on the Vaccine Injury Table & it meets the VIT criteria for that injury the process is streamlined to compensate more quickly. The HRSA/FDA admit these injuries are caused by vaccines & won't fight
If you submit a claim for an "off table" injury (even if you missed a criteria by one day), then you have to litigate. Then you are fighting the US Department of Justice, backed up with all the fraudulent disinfo the drug industry can muster
I have already addressed this. There is a difference between medical/scientific proof and legal proof, especially concerning non-omnibus autism cases. For NVICP, there is no requirement for medical/scientific proof. All the plaintiff has to establish is a theory and a timeline. A person being compensated through NVICP is NOT medical/scientific proof that vaccines cause autism.
I've been so kind as to at least provide support for my statements here. Why have you not done the same?
If I recall correctly, you were chastising me earlier for making claims with no evidence to support them. I've clearly supported them. Where is the evidence to support YOUR claims? I've specifically asked you for sources on several of your statements and you've completly ignored them.
Yes, I'm sure you're going to go with the typical "diseases were declining prior to vaccines and sanitation/health is the reason for reduction in diseases, not vaccines" argument.
To which I will counter: When vaccines are introduced, case rates (not merely mortality rates) for that disease decreases and does not rebound without a reduction of the number of vaccines.
I'll also point out the vaccines that have been introduced in the last couple of decades that have a corresponding drop in the number of cases after introduction. If you believe that sanitation/nutrition is the reason for drops in disease cases, please do show what vast improvements in sanitation and nutrition have occured in the past 2 decades.
Also, many countries around the world still have poor sanitation/nutrition, but with vaccines their disease rates decrease as well.
You talk about "disease rates [decreasing]" in nations with poor nutrition/sanitation when they are vaccinated. This is disingenuous. Any child whose immune system is not impaired will react properly to live vax pathogens, resulting in a rate decrease. If a child's immune system is impaired & they are vaccinated (contraindication for MMR) that could kill or injure them
We must find kids susceptible to vax injury BEFORE injection, not after
Which of my arguments lack evidence? Simply because you IGNORE the evidence does not mean it's lacking.
I think it would be awesome if we could predict who would be injured by a medication before it's given. It doesn't mean that we should just stop vaccines until that happens.
@Stumpy- It's not a prediction if you understand the mechanism by which the kids are injured. To do that you have to study vaccines and kids in a clinical setting. This gets us to the truth. EVERYTHING you have posted is an attempt to shroud the truth or is an outright lie.
You still don't address any on the information I have posted or apologize for your GROSS mistatement of fact regarding WHO records of vaccinations for 2010
You admit vaccines injure people. Let's do clinical studies to prove how many are injured & why I see you avoid saying "children" or "kids", who make up the vast majority of "people" injured by vaccines. Trying to slant the argument in a less harsh light?
You say "BILLIONS of vaccines given each year". That's a lie. Why lie? Again the word "agenda" comes to mind
"Allergic reactions" are immune problems. Vax are proved to cause immune problems. Affecting immunity in a bad way needs study
because children or kids are not the only people injured by vaccines. Why are you ignoring adults who are injured? It seems as if you're the one trying to put a slant on the situation.
Yes, billions of vaccines are given each year.
In 2010, worldwide measles vaccination accounted to more than 5 billion vaccines by itself. ww w*who*int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs286/en/
What information are YOU using to calculate the number of vax given?
@Stumpy WHO page does not support your ridiculous claim of 5 billion measles vaccines in 2010
1 quote- "2001 to 2011 an estimated one billion children aged 9 months to 14 years who live in high risk countries were vaccinated against the disease [measles]" A ten year period
Here's the quote you deliberately misconstrued "In 2010, about 85% of the world's children received one dose of measles vaccine by their 1st birthday"
5 billion is about 85% of the entire world population. Why do you lie?
You're absolutely right. I completely misinterpreted the data. It was not intentional, and I have no problem admitting I was wrong about the number of measles vaccines given yearly.
It's going to take some time to get an actual hard number for the number of vaccines given a year, and so far I've gotten:
In 2009 around 360 Million polio vaccines administered: ww w*who*int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs114/en/
That's over half a billion vaccines yearly from just DTP and Polio. I believe there are well over a dozen vaccines available at the moment.
When I get the time I'll look more into how many vaccines are given a year, but considering that just with DTP and Polio amounting to over half a billion yearly, my claim of billions of vaccines given is not that far fetched.
@Stumpy- You state "people" are injured by vax. I point out you appear to be avoiding the words kids or children... then you claim I am ignoring adults? You are just trying to start an argument over nothing to detract from the lies you are spouting
You don't address any info I post
I ask you for references, you deliberately misquote a WHO web page to try to support your posted lies
What kind of animal are you that you would harm children by lying to protect a vaccination program?
Specifying only children is an obvious attempt to emotionally charge the conversation. Children are not the only people to be injured by vaccines. All children are people, yet all people are not children. My use of the word "people" is more accurate than your use of only "children" or "kids".
@Stumpy- 4 posts rambling about anti-vaxers w/o evidence
You show you don't understand the NCVIA, or lie. Vaccine makers don't pay a dime. A surcharge paid by the vaccinated funds NCVIA
You "support making meds safer", but "that doesn't mean arguing against current vaccines". Nonsense... You ignore the fact that vax injure some kids, so safety obviously needs improving
NCVIA requiring vax-damaged kids's families to file suit in DC means only those who can afford up front costs can sue
What do you want evidence of, exactly? I will be more than happy to supply it for you.
Vaccine makers add to the cost of their product to cover the NVCIP. This does affect their profit margin. If they sell less product because of the higher cost, it affects their income.
NVCIP has paid out more than 2 billion dollars since 1988 for vaccine injury.
w ww*hrsa.gov/vaccinecompensation/statisticsreports*html#Claims
@Stumpy NVICP uses the Vaccine Injury Table (VIT) to determine if a child's injuries fall within certain guidelines for automatic compensation for many known injuries caused by many different vaccines
If a family is seeking compensation for a vax injury not on the VIT they must prove the injury was caused by vax, as in any injury lawsuit, but have to sue only in DC
You disingenuously broad-brush people seeking compensation as money-grubbing liars
Where have I given the impression that I think everyone involved in DVICP proceedings are money-grubbing liars?
I haven't seen anything stating that a person has to physically move to DC to file a lawsuit in this situation. Do you have a link with more information on that? I would like to see it.
If you REALLY want an answer, then my moral standard does not allow me to be an apologist for acts that are absolutely reprehensible no matter if they are legalized or even accepted by someone somewhere in the world.
Like I said before, marital rape and violence are legal in some parts of the world, but that does not mean that I'm going to support it, even indirectly or defend the practices.
What are you accusing me of lol? Having seen dogs fight??? discussing with other ytube users which dogs are the most ferocious???
Lol..plz tell me you have more than this. Plz tell me you have something more inciminating?
But you on the other hand get paid to lie to the public on ytube. Nice job mate, you are making wonderful contributions to humanity. Your job is something to be proud of...
@StumpyOuch NO..i'm trying to get an answer out of you! And what actions are you talking about? Me having seen dogs fighting??? Me having discussions with other youtube users about which are the most ferocious dogs??? Is this all you can find on me shill??? Plz tell you have something more profound???
You coward. You get paid to tell lies all day long and deceive people. What a pathetic excuse for a human being you are. You are a discrace and could do with a punch in the face!!!
@promiseIsaih60 It's unbelievable how truly stupid you are. But I'll try to humor your question.
Zo made threats to several YTers, and you applauded him for it. I'll bet at least one of your kids is a serial killer who will be caught soon.
See the little arrow on the video screen? Click it & the video plays. You didn't know this, or you wouldn't be asking questions the vid clearly answers.
YOU are certainly no threat to me. You represent a small number of idiots posting online.
Seriously? No, really. Seriously? Are you high or crazy?
Do you even know what the word eugenics means? If so, how does that apply to something that is given to every single age, sex, race, social, religious and economic group there is? Exactly who are "they" trying to weed out?
If it's an attempt at population reduction, then it's a huge failure.
I'm also fascinated to learn that disease apparently did not exist before vaccines were invented. Apparently vaccines were invented to prevent things that never existed.
You psychos do more harm against your own agenda than I ever could. Thanks.
Hey @StumpyOuch you son of a motherless goat! Stop speading your lies. Its pathetic!!!
Vaccines are an assault on the immune system. And a huge money maker for the companies that make them. OK Shill? As i told you in the past...you will pay for deceiving others. Hell is going to be a little hotter for you. ALL liars are children of the devil..and the devil is the FATHER of ALL lies.
Stop lying & deceiving others(repent), and start doing what is right(confess jesus) and tell the truth....OK!!!!!
No dog i have ever owned has been involved in dog fights. Nor have i let alone even owned a fighting breed. Again here you are making up lies. You are a professional liar..il give you that.
@StumpyOuch First you FALSELY accuse me of putting my dogs into fights. And now you are asking me if i'm sitting around?...watching dog fights? WHAT??? WHAT???
Firstly you have asked me a rediculous question which is evidently based on an assumption which you have judged from a previous post of mine.
And secondly, where i sit around and what i watch is none of your business!
Arn't you one of those assholes that works for the vaccine companies, getting paid to lie to people on the tube???
Why do you think I should take spiritual advice from someone so horrible that they like to watch dogs kill each other?
If you notice, I specifically ASKED if I was correct in my memory of your activities instead of outright accusing you of such. I vaguely recalled you lecturing me before on how I needed to find jesus, and had seen a comment on your channel that mentioned dogfighting.
I did a quick google search on your name and found the following:
And those were just the first few. There are pages full of you commenting on dog fighting videos.
Amazing that you seem more upset about someone saying you "sit around" than you are about being called out on enjoying watching dogs kill each other for sport.
No, the comments made about how many organized dogfighting videos you've watched and debating which dog breeds are the best at killing and fighting mean you watch dog fighting.
There's a difference between witnessing a dogfight and watching dogs fight for sport and money. You really don't understand the difference?
@StumpyOuch Yes i have seen a video from my brother inlaw who went turkey on vacation as that is his country of origin. He bought some video's back of dog fighting which i had seen. SO WHAT SHILL???
In turkey, dog fighting is legal. No if you tread the rest of my comments..i said i do not agree with fighting dogs. But none the less, it happens in turkey, russia and other countries where dog fighting IS LEGAL and or the laws are very relaxed on it.
Seems like you've seen more than one. Earlier you were suggesting that you don't watch organized dogfights at all. I've counted about 20 different dog fighting videos you've commented on so far. That's a lot of dog fighting videos for someone who doesn't watch dog fighting videos.
@StumpyOuch Yeah i watched the whole video that was bought back from turkey. They had all state championship fights on there. I must have watched about 25 fights on that video. Dogo's, Rottie's, Pitbull's, presa's, kangal's...etc etc.
@delitemyheart So you apparently enjoy the topic, seeing as how you've spent years posting on dozens of different youtube videos debating the different dog fighting qualities of various dog breeds and expressing admiration over the fighting abilities of dogs that can viciously kill.
You're so far gone you can't even realize how repulsive that is, can you?
@StumpyOuch Yes its an interesting topic to me. In some countries it is absolutely legal. Just because it's illegal in your country, does not make other country and their laws to be wrong. Fighting dogs actually LOVE fighting..they thrive on it. As i said..i have seen a few fights on video from turkey. That does not mean i advocate it. But none the less, i find the topic interesting.
By what moral standard are you judging? By YOUR moral standard lol???
@StumpyOuch i don't see anything wrong in being schooled on which dogs can fight well etc. Tell me, say you were walking your doberman one day and a german shepherd was on the loose and came to attack your dog..isn't it good to know if your doberman will or will not survive??? Well i would, and thats why i find this topic interesting in an informative way. Because it happens all the time, there is always some dog thats escaped from its yard and is roaming the streets..i see it all the time!
The actions of watching dog fighting and subsequently discussing at great length which dog breeds are better suited as being vicious killers and expressing admiration of the ability of one dog to violently kill another.
You seem to be having a difficult time following the conversation. Perhaps if you clicked on "view all comments" at the bottom right of your screen and rereading the entire conversation it will help you recall what we're talking about...
@StumpyOuch I have never expressed admiration for one dog killing another. Thats a lie that you have invented. In countries were dog fighting is accepted and legal..the dogs never fight to the death. The fights are broken up before that happens. And the dogs actually love fighting AND THATS A FACT!!!
And yes i have discussed which dogs are better suited to fighting etc. SO WHAT???????????????????????
You seem to be an expert on dog fighting. Very odd considering you said I was lying earlier about you even watching dogfights....
Please do keep going on and on about how you think dog fighting is perfectly acceptable and how dogs loved to be torn up by another dog for the entertainment of some whacked out nutjob such as yourself.
@Stump..I did not say i had never seen dog fights. I said..."i do not watch dog fights" in other words shill..it's not something i watch on a regular basis. There is a difference between "watching" & "have seen"!
And dog fighting IS perfectly acceptable in some countries. And i would not have the gall to say that those countries have a wrong moral standard just because in your country it is un acceptable. Who do you think you are that you can judge others on what YOU think is morally acceptable?
@delitemyheart Clearly a very strange, strange & mentally unbalanced person who has WAY TOO MUCH time on her hands & no life of her own. Quite sad & pathetic, actually~
@StumpyOuch there is nothing more pathetic and evil than a low life like you who gets paid to tell lies everyday. You must be one seriously F%#@$# up person..let me tell ya!
Except you've never proved anything I've said was a lie. Just the opposite, such as when you call me a liar and I provide concrete evidence to support my claims.
To refresh your memory: such as the past couple of hours when you said I was lying about you watching dog fighting videos, and I provided direct quotes and links to show exactly where you said them and now you admit that you have watched many dogfights.
Perhaps you simply don't understand the definition of "lie"?
How exactly am I lying? I just posted multiple videos concerning dogfighting that clearly show your comments about how you watch dog fighting and how you think it's ok because dog fighting is legal in some countries.
@StumpyOuch i got nothing to hide sir lol lol, Go ahead. make my day shill. Go and read my comments. I have never said anywhere in my comments that i watch dogs fighting. That does not mean i have not seen dogs fighting..but i have never said that i watch dogs fighting and nor have i advocated it. I tell ya what..you sure are desperate arn't you shill? So desperate to try and find dirt on me. Go ahead lol, try harder? Can't you find anything better than dog fighting???
Wow, seriously, you're going to deny you made those comments? Anyone at all can copy/paste those video addresses into youtube's search bar and see the videos and your comments for themselves.
Perhaps you're so mentally unstable you've forgotten you've made those comments?
Yes there is another dog that was bread to fight .. The "Presa Canario". The presa was developed on the canary islands specifically for dog fighting. Presa's are real bad arse..i've seen a lot of them on video fighting Pitbulls and man o man its always a very even & long fight right till the end. Neither of them will give in. They both truely love to fight!- delitemyheart
That's an interesting set of morals you have there. So you feel that dogfighting is ok because it's legal in some countries? Domestic rape and violence and body mutilation are legal in some countries as well. Are you ok with those as well?
@StumpyOuch You have to respect other sovereign countries sovereign laws. Why should you impose what YOU think is right or wrong moraly onto another sovereign country which has a sovereign law???
By what moral standards is your idea based upon. Your moral standard is one that practices lying to the public. You get paid to do it. Tell me..why is your moral standard better????
@StumpyOuch My statements are my staements. But what standard or morals do you judge my statements by By what YOU think is morally good. Hahahahaha PLZ......not from a liar who gets paid to lie all day long. I think YOUR morals stink. You are a very low animal.
In my opinion the Kangal and the Alabai are the best fighting dogs period!!!-delitemyheart
I have seen about 30 big championship fights on video from turkey and russia where pitbulls fight kangals. And guess what..I have not seen ONE pitbull beat a kangal. And i'm telling you the honest truth!-delitemyheart
@delitemyheart Prom started posting (what she thought was) my personal information online. I wouldn't have bothered if she hadn't started that. It's usually not a good idea to get on my radar.
She doesn't seem to realize there are at least 15 other people using the handle "sweetalker79" - and over a hundred calling themselves "sweetalker" - online. So she thinks I'm in Kentucky, she thinks I'm in Tennessee, she thinks I'm in Canada. She thinks my name is Chad or Angie or Bill or Rose.
Once someone starts talking about "reptilian" race or "reptilian leaders", pretty much everything else they say should be looked at with great suspicion.
I've thought many conspiracies made sense to me, like 9/11, JFK assassination, moon landing hoax, Roswell, that sort of thing. But a little research goes a long way to cure stupidity. Not sure if there's a cure for the stupidity of Alex Jones and David Icke though. I think that's terminal.
I was looking at your channel page and thinking that you might be interested in looking into the psychology behind conspiracy theories. It really is amazing, if you're interested in that type of thing.
It's absolutely amazing that every single conspiracy theorist I've encountered on youtube has pretty much exactly the same argument. Doubly amazing, considering how much they prize individuality and scorn the "sheeple".
One of the downsides of the internet is now these people can spread their lunacy from the warmth and comfort of their own home instead of standing out on the street corner ranting at passersby as they were confined to in the past.
@StumpyOuch Absolutely. I love looking at the psychology of almost everything. I looked at it for conspiracy theories too, and still do.It's fascinating.
It's predictable. The constant moving of the goal posts, claiming that a lack of evidence on the one side means it supports their cause automatically, even when there is no evidence to support their argument. Then it resorts to insults and accusing the ones arguing them that they're "paid" to trick people.
@StumpyOuch Absolutely. I love looking at the psychology of almost everything. I looked at it for conspiracy theories too, and still do.It's fascinating.
It's predictable. The constant moving of the goal posts, claiming that a lack of evidence on the one side means it supports their cause automatically, even when there is no evidence to support their argument. Then it resorts to insults and accusing the ones arguing them that they're "paid" to trick people.
I often see stupid, racist, inflammatory posts. I either respond negatively or ignore them. I DON'T reply with "you're doing such a good job! you're wonderful! Keep up the good work!" and other such ass-kissing fluff you've posted to these morons.
@promiseIsaih60 Who said I was in any danger? My beef with you was that YOU, calling yourself a good person, idolize and hold up as ideals men who cry for the rape & murder of people who disagree with them. You cheer them on, you hold them up as people to be listened to.
So in case you didn't "get it", I'm holding YOU responsible for what YOU post. Your posts are up there, in case you weren't looking. "zowaff, your fantastic!" "dawes, you're such a good friend!"
@sweetalker79 People are FREE to post whatever they want. Who said I was cheering them on to rape & murder?? You're a very stange girl, to be sure. I never said dawes was a good friend but *if you hate him, he has to have some good in him ;) Zowaff puts out alot of info as I do so I stand by my comments just as all your little Merck shills friends can stand by you~ :)
@sweetalker79 I've seen YOUR EDITED VERSION where I was Not cheering them on to rape & muder [nice desperate try tho ;)] I was cheering on their stand on vaccines~ This video really is a nice little piece of desperation. I like it!
I'M FLATTERED!! XOXOXOXO<3!! I think it's funny [& weird] how you somehow hold ME responsible for what OTHER YouTubers post, when I have no control over that but thanks anyway ;) Kisses!!!
How sad... when someone is banned, all their comments are deleted automatically. Halloweennight, I didn't mean to ban you from commenting on this video - just from another video of mine. Here, I'll repost for you: "your mother hated u". Feel better now?
sweetalker79 2 months ago
Really? Nothing to add but insults, @mikenotnumberone1 ? You bore me. Come back when you have something interesting to say.
sweetalker79 3 months ago
@mikenotnumberone1 You only surf one tab at a time? You poor sad blumpkin.
sweetalker79 3 months ago
@Halloweenight1978 oh, now the myers man is geeking me again? good one, does your vocabulary expand ever dumbfuck??
mikenotnumberone1 3 months ago 3
@mikenotnumberone1 "what" bothered me exactly? This video was made a long time ago. Antivaxers post videos all the time mocking people they don't agree with, and I find it funny that they can't bear to have their own foibles thrust into public scrutiny.
sweetalker79 3 months ago
@sweetalker79 I am not interested in your lengthy excuses. so if one guy pulls a gun on you innocently..will you return the favor and do it to someone else for no reason? This is the biggest waste of time I got to laugh at since I drove bferg over a cliff screaming help.
mikenotnumberone1 3 months ago
@mikenotnumberone1 I'll say it one more time: If you are NOT zowafflesidekickcunt, then you have nothing to worry about and no reason to still be here. Your name is NOT on this video. Nowhere on this video does it say "mikenotnumberone1 = zowafflesidekickcunt".
The fact that you're still here, whining about how this video hurts your widdle feelings, looks awfully suspicious to anyone reading your posts.
sweetalker79 3 months ago
@mikenotnumberone1 LMAO he would "pull a gun on me innocently"?
You are a sad, pathetic little boy. Go play somewhere else.
sweetalker79 3 months ago
@mikenotnumberone1 Spam and threats are removed. This is your last warning, one more and you're banned.
sweetalker79 3 months ago
@sweetalker79 oh pussy shut up..what you spam or ban is reality..youre a worthless twerp who cannot handle the truth. Making tribute videos of people? what a bizarre thing to do. you always try to spam people's comments..is that gonna change anything here? Show me a threat I made to you on this thread dummy! AHAHAHA Sweet issuing the "I am warning you" get a new sockpuppet account adn some glasses...show me where I threatened you
mikenotnumberone1 3 months ago
@mikenotnumberone1 "you always try to spam people's comments" no.
googleDOTcom/support/forum/p/youtube/thread?tid=1e7b8a7ebc4ac59c&hl=en
If you copy and paste a comment, it will come up as spam. Also if your comment matches or is similar to other comments, it might mark it as spam. Certain words are also filtered by YouTube.
sweetalker79 3 months ago
@mikenotnumberone1 I said Bill Gates is not a doctor, a virologist, or any kind of scientist - all true things. He's offering life-saving technology to the poorer sections of the world and you suggest he stop - why?
Most people aren't "nuts", btw - they're just confused b/c of people like you screaming at them for believing in science.
sweetalker79 3 months ago
@sweetalker79 What a fail! LOL zowaffle followed me into my friends pages and the sock account followed zo. apparently you cannot even click on a profile to determine this? Good work! This might be one of the funniest fails I have ever seen! Good reporting and a complete waste of time not showing all the facts! FAIL SWEET!
mikenotnumberone1 3 months ago
@mikenotnumberone1 If zowafflesidekickcunt is NOT you, then you have nothing to worry about.
Your getting up in arms about this is proof enough for me that z.w.s.k.c. IS, in fact, your very own sockpuppet.
sweetalker79 3 months ago
Haters gonna hate.
Deciheximal 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
UFC Champion Andrei Arlovski: "I have a choice to step into the cage to fight, but these dogs have no choice. Dog fighting is morally wrong and inhumane. In my opinion it's torture."
UFC fighter Rob McCullough: "I choose to fight, but a lot of dogs don't get that choice. Dog fighting is not cool."
BTW, those vids your brother has? Just possessing them is illegal in most states - considered similar to child pornography.
Bye now! :)
sweetalker79 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
To answer delitemyheart's query about why UFC fighting is legal and his beloved dogfighting is not:
A fighter dog is trained by being starved to the point of near-death, then fed ONLY when it slaughters "bait" kittens. The kitten's legs are often broken beforehand so that it can't scratch.
Acc. to U.S. federal investigators, "loving" owners will often "drown, strangle, hang, shoot, or electrocute" dogs that lose or get old.
UFC fighters... sign contracts & win money. Poor things.
sweetalker79 4 months ago
@MoodyBluze
I completely support making medicine better and safer for everyone. However, that doesn't mean arguing against current vaccines.
Vaccine makers DO have to pay for damages caused by vaccines. NVICP was created solely for that. The problems antivaxers have with it is that one actually has to PROVE the vaccines caused the damages. I find it disturbing that people seem to be the most upset because they can't sue anyone for anything and win.
cont
StumpyOuch 4 months ago
As I said before, I'm all for making medicine and vaccines better all around. That doesn't mean we need to disgard everything we have now.
Compared to the BILLIONS of vaccines given each year, only a small amount of people are injured by them, and the injuries are usually allergic reactions. It is regrettable.
But EVERYTHING in existance has the potential for risk. If anti-vaxers were TRULY as concerned with preserving lives as they claim, then they should seek to ban automobiles.
StumpyOuch 4 months ago
A problem I have with most anti-vaxers is their completely irrational view points when it comes to vaccines. They rant and rave about the damage that may be inflicted by a vaccine (although the vast majority of what they're ranting about has nothing to do with vaccines other than a coincidence in timing) while completely ignoring the fact that without the vaccines many many more people would suffer and die.
StumpyOuch 4 months ago
Why is it that they think that a child developing autism (which has NEVER been linked to vaccines, btw, other than a coincidence in timing) is so much worse than children DYING from diseases that are easily avoidable?
Why is autism worse than death for these people?
Then you get into the whole psychotic conspiracy theory garbage that so many anti-vaxers believe that it's just sickening.
StumpyOuch 4 months ago
@Stumpy- again you use fear mongering, in generalizations. The FDA/CDC claim 36,000 died of the flu in 2008. But if you study the info at their websites you find the deaths are flu RELATED. They died of something else while it is ASSUMED they had the flu. Digging a little further, FDA/CDC admit the # of deaths is estimated. What's the truth? I don't know. Neither does the FDA or CDC
Then you revert to insulting "most antivaxers" as getting into the "psychotic conspiracy theory garbage"
MoodyBluze 4 months ago
@MoodyBluze
Yes, 36,000 is an estimate. Some years its less, some years it's more. What exactly do you not understand about the definition of "estimate"? Do you think the exact same number of people should die each year for it to be valid?
No, they died of complications from the flu. Without the flu, they would not have died of the complications. The flu caused the complications.
Would you say that people don't die of car accidents but instead of complications due to car accidents?
StumpyOuch 4 months ago
@Stumpy- You use fear mongering to support your apparent agenda. You claim the "vast majority [of vaccine damages] [are] a coincidence in timing" & "[w/o] vaccines many more people would suffer & die". What references are you using to come up with these generalizations?
You say most "anti-vaxers" have "completely irrational view-points". Which people & what viewpoints?
The package inserts & VIT are clear that vax are linked to & CAUSE many injuries in kids. What's not clear is how many
MoodyBluze 4 months ago
@MoodyBluze
What fear mongering have I used? I've provided solid stats to support what I say. What exactly have you provided?
The references I'm using is that most of the claims concerning vaccine damage I see argued here is in relation to autism. Childhood vaccines are given during the same time frame that autism can be detected. This is a coincidence in timing. There is NOTHING else that supports the vaccine/autism link other than A happened, then B happened, therefor A caused B.
StumpyOuch 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@StumpyOuch You are ignoring what is in my posts to you and rambling about irrelevant things.
I'll deal with your "concidence in timing" claim & "nothing else supports the vaccine/autism link"
Vaccines are known to be linked to & cause dozens of neurological injuries in children. My references- Vaccine Injury Table, MMR package insert (there's MANY more)
Google- nellco autism - this is a law review study of 1000 children who were compensated for vax-caused brain injuries. 83 also are autistic
MoodyBluze 4 months ago
@MoodyBluze
What exactly am I rambling about? I'm providing solid evidence to my claims. What am I ignoring in your posts? I'm responding post by post with specific evidence.
Vaccines have been known to cause some neurological injuries. I've never disputed that. It has NEVER been scientifically or medically proven to cause autism. Ever.
Oh, michael, it is you! I thought I recognized your argument skills.
StumpyOuch 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@StumpyOuch Yep, it's definitely our old friend Mikey.
The same misspellings, leaving the period off the end of sentences, the rallying cry of "lies!" if something comes from a science journal, the hero worship of Bernadine Healy (a cardiologist, not virologist, who was forced to resign from the Red Cross b/c she asked people for donations after 9/11 then "forgot" to give them to the victims' families), and especially the insistence that anyone disagreeing with him is out to "hurt kids".
sweetalker79 4 months ago
@sweetalker79
Well, at least he's dropped the "Two Studies!! Show me just two studies!!" crap that I listened to repeatedly for years. He'll probably start up again now that I mentioned it.
StumpyOuch 4 months ago
@sweetalker79
Don't forget the constant criticism of others for things that he's guilty of himself. For instance, constantly claiming that I provide no evidence for my claims.
Count the number of links I've provided. Then count his.
StumpyOuch 4 months ago
@sweetalker79
And now we get to enjoy his repetition of material already covered. Let's see how many times he wants to rehash the same conversation we've just had.
He's already repeated the bit about terminology (kids vs people)
He's already repeated the falsehood that NVCIP court decisions are medical/scientific proof that vaccines cause autism.
He'll also never answer any questions I ask of him.
Ah, the deja vu that comes from having conversations with good ol mike.
StumpyOuch 4 months ago
@MoodyBluze
The nellco brief is not a medical study. It is not a scientific study. It's a review by lawyers based on the NVCIP.
As you very well know, in non omnibus vaccine procceedings, it is NOT necessary to prove scientifically or medically that vaccines cause autism. THis is the requirement to win a case in NVCIP claiming vaccines caused autism damage:
cont
StumpyOuch 4 months ago
1.a medical theory causally connecting the vaccination and the injury;
2.a logical sequence of cause and effect showing that the vaccination was the reason for the injury; and
3.a showing of a proximate temporal relationship between vaccination and injury.[10]
Simply a theory, a sequence of events, and a time line. That is all that's needed, and it's NOT scientifically or medically supported.
cont
StumpyOuch 4 months ago
I'll also point out that if you're going with merely legal evidence to claim vaccines cause autism, the Omnibus Court ruled that there was NO vaccine-autism link.
StumpyOuch 4 months ago
Comment removed
bristow0156 4 months ago
@bristow0156
I'm not sure why you removed your comment (or why you've hopped onto yet another Screen Name) but for anyone who's interested in what you removed:
Cont...
StumpyOuch 4 months ago
Well damn, nevermind. My copy/paste from my inbox messed up and then sweet posted a response to me, replacing bristow/mike/moodybluez/about a dozen different other names' comments.
Ah well
StumpyOuch 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@StumpyBitch, "I'm providing solid evidence to my claims" Ad hominems, logical fallacies, and unsubstantiated assertions are not "solid evidence."
EPIC FAIL
MaximusArurealius 3 months ago
@Stump Again you lie. If a child's injury is on the Vaccine Injury Table & it meets the VIT criteria for that injury the process is streamlined to compensate more quickly. The HRSA/FDA admit these injuries are caused by vaccines & won't fight
If you submit a claim for an "off table" injury (even if you missed a criteria by one day), then you have to litigate. Then you are fighting the US Department of Justice, backed up with all the fraudulent disinfo the drug industry can muster
bristow0156 4 months ago
@bristow0156
I have already addressed this. There is a difference between medical/scientific proof and legal proof, especially concerning non-omnibus autism cases. For NVICP, there is no requirement for medical/scientific proof. All the plaintiff has to establish is a theory and a timeline. A person being compensated through NVICP is NOT medical/scientific proof that vaccines cause autism.
w w w*hrsa*gov/vaccinecompensation/index*html
StumpyOuch 4 months ago
@MoodyBluze
I've been so kind as to at least provide support for my statements here. Why have you not done the same?
If I recall correctly, you were chastising me earlier for making claims with no evidence to support them. I've clearly supported them. Where is the evidence to support YOUR claims? I've specifically asked you for sources on several of your statements and you've completly ignored them.
StumpyOuch 4 months ago
@MoodyBluze
Yes, I'm sure you're going to go with the typical "diseases were declining prior to vaccines and sanitation/health is the reason for reduction in diseases, not vaccines" argument.
To which I will counter: When vaccines are introduced, case rates (not merely mortality rates) for that disease decreases and does not rebound without a reduction of the number of vaccines.
cont
StumpyOuch 4 months ago
I'll also point out the vaccines that have been introduced in the last couple of decades that have a corresponding drop in the number of cases after introduction. If you believe that sanitation/nutrition is the reason for drops in disease cases, please do show what vast improvements in sanitation and nutrition have occured in the past 2 decades.
Also, many countries around the world still have poor sanitation/nutrition, but with vaccines their disease rates decrease as well.
StumpyOuch 4 months ago
Hib- Introduced in 1985 in the US -link explains drop in cases after vaccine introduction:
w w w*who*int/nuvi/hib/en/
Rotavirus vaccine- introduced mid-late 1980s- link details resulting drops of cases after introduction
w ww*who*int/nuvi/rotavirus/en/
StumpyOuch 4 months ago
@Stumpy Your arguments lack evidence
You talk about "disease rates [decreasing]" in nations with poor nutrition/sanitation when they are vaccinated. This is disingenuous. Any child whose immune system is not impaired will react properly to live vax pathogens, resulting in a rate decrease. If a child's immune system is impaired & they are vaccinated (contraindication for MMR) that could kill or injure them
We must find kids susceptible to vax injury BEFORE injection, not after
MoodyBluze 4 months ago
@MoodyBluze
Which of my arguments lack evidence? Simply because you IGNORE the evidence does not mean it's lacking.
I think it would be awesome if we could predict who would be injured by a medication before it's given. It doesn't mean that we should just stop vaccines until that happens.
StumpyOuch 4 months ago
@Stumpy- It's not a prediction if you understand the mechanism by which the kids are injured. To do that you have to study vaccines and kids in a clinical setting. This gets us to the truth. EVERYTHING you have posted is an attempt to shroud the truth or is an outright lie.
You still don't address any on the information I have posted or apologize for your GROSS mistatement of fact regarding WHO records of vaccinations for 2010
Evidence- Vaccine Injury Table, MMR package insert- PROTECT KIDS
MoodyBluze 4 months ago
You admit vaccines injure people. Let's do clinical studies to prove how many are injured & why I see you avoid saying "children" or "kids", who make up the vast majority of "people" injured by vaccines. Trying to slant the argument in a less harsh light?
You say "BILLIONS of vaccines given each year". That's a lie. Why lie? Again the word "agenda" comes to mind
"Allergic reactions" are immune problems. Vax are proved to cause immune problems. Affecting immunity in a bad way needs study
MoodyBluze 4 months ago
@MoodyBluze
because children or kids are not the only people injured by vaccines. Why are you ignoring adults who are injured? It seems as if you're the one trying to put a slant on the situation.
Yes, billions of vaccines are given each year.
In 2010, worldwide measles vaccination accounted to more than 5 billion vaccines by itself. ww w*who*int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs286/en/
What information are YOU using to calculate the number of vax given?
StumpyOuch 4 months ago
@Stumpy WHO page does not support your ridiculous claim of 5 billion measles vaccines in 2010
1 quote- "2001 to 2011 an estimated one billion children aged 9 months to 14 years who live in high risk countries were vaccinated against the disease [measles]" A ten year period
Here's the quote you deliberately misconstrued "In 2010, about 85% of the world's children received one dose of measles vaccine by their 1st birthday"
5 billion is about 85% of the entire world population. Why do you lie?
MoodyBluze 4 months ago
@MoodyBluze
You're absolutely right. I completely misinterpreted the data. It was not intentional, and I have no problem admitting I was wrong about the number of measles vaccines given yearly.
It's going to take some time to get an actual hard number for the number of vaccines given a year, and so far I've gotten:
In 2009 around 360 Million polio vaccines administered: ww w*who*int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs114/en/
StumpyOuch 4 months ago
300 million vaccinations against DTP yearly:
whqlibdoc*who*int/publications/2009/9789241563864_eng*pdf
That's over half a billion vaccines yearly from just DTP and Polio. I believe there are well over a dozen vaccines available at the moment.
When I get the time I'll look more into how many vaccines are given a year, but considering that just with DTP and Polio amounting to over half a billion yearly, my claim of billions of vaccines given is not that far fetched.
cont
StumpyOuch 4 months ago
Of course, if you have any actual data on the subject, I would love to see it.
StumpyOuch 4 months ago
Roughly 100 million flu vaccines given yearly in the US alone:
w ww*cdc*gov/washington/fluBrief/flu_newsletter_december*pdf
StumpyOuch 4 months ago
@Stumpy- You state "people" are injured by vax. I point out you appear to be avoiding the words kids or children... then you claim I am ignoring adults? You are just trying to start an argument over nothing to detract from the lies you are spouting
You don't address any info I post
I ask you for references, you deliberately misquote a WHO web page to try to support your posted lies
What kind of animal are you that you would harm children by lying to protect a vaccination program?
MoodyBluze 4 months ago
@MoodyBluze
Specifying only children is an obvious attempt to emotionally charge the conversation. Children are not the only people to be injured by vaccines. All children are people, yet all people are not children. My use of the word "people" is more accurate than your use of only "children" or "kids".
StumpyOuch 4 months ago
@MoodyBluze
here's some more information about the number of vaccines given in a year.
ww w*who*int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs286/en/
StumpyOuch 4 months ago
@Stumpy- 4 posts rambling about anti-vaxers w/o evidence
You show you don't understand the NCVIA, or lie. Vaccine makers don't pay a dime. A surcharge paid by the vaccinated funds NCVIA
You "support making meds safer", but "that doesn't mean arguing against current vaccines". Nonsense... You ignore the fact that vax injure some kids, so safety obviously needs improving
NCVIA requiring vax-damaged kids's families to file suit in DC means only those who can afford up front costs can sue
MoodyBluze 4 months ago
@MoodyBluze
What do you want evidence of, exactly? I will be more than happy to supply it for you.
Vaccine makers add to the cost of their product to cover the NVCIP. This does affect their profit margin. If they sell less product because of the higher cost, it affects their income.
NVCIP has paid out more than 2 billion dollars since 1988 for vaccine injury.
w ww*hrsa.gov/vaccinecompensation/statisticsreports*html#Claims
cont
StumpyOuch 4 months ago
I haven't ignored it. I simply haven't taken an irrational, all or nothing viewpoint to it. I understand that vaccines are beneficial to society.
It costs $250 to file, and there is even assistance given to those who need it:
ftp*hrsa*gov/vaccinecompensation/84521_Booklet*pdf
StumpyOuch 4 months ago
@MoodyBluze
It's obvious that some kids die in car accidents, so safety obviously needs improving. Do you suggest we stop all production and use of automobiles?
It's obvious that some kids die of allergies to peanuts. Should we ban all peanut products?
It's obvious that some kids die of drowning. Should we ban bathtime and swimming?
Is there ANYTHING else in existance that you apply the same standards as you do vaccines? Anything at all?
StumpyOuch 4 months ago
@Stumpy NVICP uses the Vaccine Injury Table (VIT) to determine if a child's injuries fall within certain guidelines for automatic compensation for many known injuries caused by many different vaccines
If a family is seeking compensation for a vax injury not on the VIT they must prove the injury was caused by vax, as in any injury lawsuit, but have to sue only in DC
You disingenuously broad-brush people seeking compensation as money-grubbing liars
What's your agenda here... truth or fiction?
MoodyBluze 4 months ago
@MoodyBluze
Where have I given the impression that I think everyone involved in DVICP proceedings are money-grubbing liars?
I haven't seen anything stating that a person has to physically move to DC to file a lawsuit in this situation. Do you have a link with more information on that? I would like to see it.
StumpyOuch 4 months ago
edit- NVICP*
StumpyOuch 4 months ago
@delitemyheart
It's "disgrace". d-i-s-g-r-a-c-e.
If you REALLY want an answer, then my moral standard does not allow me to be an apologist for acts that are absolutely reprehensible no matter if they are legalized or even accepted by someone somewhere in the world.
Like I said before, marital rape and violence are legal in some parts of the world, but that does not mean that I'm going to support it, even indirectly or defend the practices.
StumpyOuch 4 months ago
@StumpyOuch OK..SO WHAT IS IT THAT YOU ARE ACCUSING ME OF???
ANSWR PLZ???
delitemyheart 4 months ago
@StumpyOuch You COWARD.
GET A REAL JOB YOU WHORE BAG!!!
What are you accusing me of lol? Having seen dogs fight??? discussing with other ytube users which dogs are the most ferocious???
Lol..plz tell me you have more than this. Plz tell me you have something more inciminating?
But you on the other hand get paid to lie to the public on ytube. Nice job mate, you are making wonderful contributions to humanity. Your job is something to be proud of...
Good work!!!
delitemyheart 4 months ago
@delitemyheart
I don't think you understand the definition of the word "lie". It doesn't mean "anything I don't agree with".
Point out exactly what I've lied about, and show evidence that I'm lying. Reminder, you ranting "you're a liar!!!!!!!!!!" doesn't make it true.
StumpyOuch 4 months ago
@delitemyheart
Wow, you're STILL trying to rationalize and justify your actions. Sad. Very sad.
StumpyOuch 4 months ago
@StumpyOuch NO..i'm trying to get an answer out of you! And what actions are you talking about? Me having seen dogs fighting??? Me having discussions with other youtube users about which are the most ferocious dogs??? Is this all you can find on me shill??? Plz tell you have something more profound???
You coward. You get paid to tell lies all day long and deceive people. What a pathetic excuse for a human being you are. You are a discrace and could do with a punch in the face!!!
delitemyheart 4 months ago
@delitemyheart
You really need some anger management courses. And a dictionary. I have seen you use the word "discrace" so many times it makes my brain hurt.
Please, go seek professional mental help. You really do need it. Truly. You seem to be extraordinarily unbalanced.
StumpyOuch 4 months ago
@delitemyheart "you could do with a punch in the face"
One more threat like that and you'll be banned from this discussion. Last warning.
sweetalker79 4 months ago
@sweetalker79 You wanna ban me lol??? GO AHEAD..MAKE MY DAY PUNK!!!!!
delitemyheart 4 months ago 8
This has been flagged as spam show
@delitemyheart Your wish is my command.
sweetalker79 4 months ago 5
@StumpyOuch I notice that Prom is no longer coming to delite's defense, with the dogfighting charge come to light.
Well done!
sweetalker79 4 months ago
@sweetalker79
Oh, I'm sure she'll come to his defense again soon. You know her, the enemy of her enemy is her friend, no matter how vile they are.
StumpyOuch 4 months ago
@delitemyheart
Threats of violence from a mentally unbalanced religious freak dog-fight loving anti-vax conspiracy nutjob? I am indeed shocked, sir!
StumpyOuch 4 months ago
*Hey Sweet, who's threatenining you?? [you're so strange]
promiseIsaih60 4 months ago
@promiseIsaih60 It's unbelievable how truly stupid you are. But I'll try to humor your question.
Zo made threats to several YTers, and you applauded him for it. I'll bet at least one of your kids is a serial killer who will be caught soon.
See the little arrow on the video screen? Click it & the video plays. You didn't know this, or you wouldn't be asking questions the vid clearly answers.
YOU are certainly no threat to me. You represent a small number of idiots posting online.
sweetalker79 4 months ago 3
@SprayOClockNews
Seriously? No, really. Seriously? Are you high or crazy?
Do you even know what the word eugenics means? If so, how does that apply to something that is given to every single age, sex, race, social, religious and economic group there is? Exactly who are "they" trying to weed out?
If it's an attempt at population reduction, then it's a huge failure.
1900- world population around 2 billion people
2010- world population around 7 billion people
StumpyOuch 4 months ago
I'm also fascinated to learn that disease apparently did not exist before vaccines were invented. Apparently vaccines were invented to prevent things that never existed.
You psychos do more harm against your own agenda than I ever could. Thanks.
StumpyOuch 4 months ago
Hey @StumpyOuch you son of a motherless goat! Stop speading your lies. Its pathetic!!!
Vaccines are an assault on the immune system. And a huge money maker for the companies that make them. OK Shill? As i told you in the past...you will pay for deceiving others. Hell is going to be a little hotter for you. ALL liars are children of the devil..and the devil is the FATHER of ALL lies.
Stop lying & deceiving others(repent), and start doing what is right(confess jesus) and tell the truth....OK!!!!!
delitemyheart 4 months ago
@delitemyheart
I think you need to up the dosage on your meds.
StumpyOuch 4 months ago
@StumpyOuch Sorry but i do not and will not dose up on pharma meds. I have better things to consume for my body when needed!
delitemyheart 4 months ago
@delitemyheart
You seriously need to consume something, then, because it's sorely needed.
StumpyOuch 4 months ago
@delitemyheart
By the way, are you that psycho that loves dog fights? Didn't you put your dogs into dogfights? Do you still do that?
StumpyOuch 4 months ago
Hey @StumpyOuch....DONT MAKE UP LIES ABOUT ME!
No dog i have ever owned has been involved in dog fights. Nor have i let alone even owned a fighting breed. Again here you are making up lies. You are a professional liar..il give you that.
PATHETIC!!!
delitemyheart 4 months ago
@delitemyheart
OK, but don't you love to sit around and watch dogfights?
StumpyOuch 4 months ago
@StumpyOuch First you FALSELY accuse me of putting my dogs into fights. And now you are asking me if i'm sitting around?...watching dog fights? WHAT??? WHAT???
Firstly you have asked me a rediculous question which is evidently based on an assumption which you have judged from a previous post of mine.
And secondly, where i sit around and what i watch is none of your business!
Arn't you one of those assholes that works for the vaccine companies, getting paid to lie to people on the tube???
delitemyheart 4 months ago
@delitemyheart
Why do you think I should take spiritual advice from someone so horrible that they like to watch dogs kill each other?
If you notice, I specifically ASKED if I was correct in my memory of your activities instead of outright accusing you of such. I vaguely recalled you lecturing me before on how I needed to find jesus, and had seen a comment on your channel that mentioned dogfighting.
I did a quick google search on your name and found the following:
cont
StumpyOuch 4 months ago
watch?v=bnpQztTmY9k
watch?v=6WAfhl3r53Y
watch?v=uVx9-CVwSbw
watch?v=4cU7nqyJSEY
And those were just the first few. There are pages full of you commenting on dog fighting videos.
Amazing that you seem more upset about someone saying you "sit around" than you are about being called out on enjoying watching dogs kill each other for sport.
Your values seem to be skewed.
StumpyOuch 4 months ago
Comment removed
delitemyheart 4 months ago
@delitemyheart
No, the comments made about how many organized dogfighting videos you've watched and debating which dog breeds are the best at killing and fighting mean you watch dog fighting.
There's a difference between witnessing a dogfight and watching dogs fight for sport and money. You really don't understand the difference?
StumpyOuch 4 months ago
@StumpyOuch Yes i have seen a video from my brother inlaw who went turkey on vacation as that is his country of origin. He bought some video's back of dog fighting which i had seen. SO WHAT SHILL???
In turkey, dog fighting is legal. No if you tread the rest of my comments..i said i do not agree with fighting dogs. But none the less, it happens in turkey, russia and other countries where dog fighting IS LEGAL and or the laws are very relaxed on it.
delitemyheart 4 months ago
@delitemyheart
Seems like you've seen more than one. Earlier you were suggesting that you don't watch organized dogfights at all. I've counted about 20 different dog fighting videos you've commented on so far. That's a lot of dog fighting videos for someone who doesn't watch dog fighting videos.
StumpyOuch 4 months ago
@StumpyOuch Yeah i watched the whole video that was bought back from turkey. They had all state championship fights on there. I must have watched about 25 fights on that video. Dogo's, Rottie's, Pitbull's, presa's, kangal's...etc etc.
So what???
delitemyheart 4 months ago
@delitemyheart So you apparently enjoy the topic, seeing as how you've spent years posting on dozens of different youtube videos debating the different dog fighting qualities of various dog breeds and expressing admiration over the fighting abilities of dogs that can viciously kill.
You're so far gone you can't even realize how repulsive that is, can you?
StumpyOuch 4 months ago
@StumpyOuch Yes its an interesting topic to me. In some countries it is absolutely legal. Just because it's illegal in your country, does not make other country and their laws to be wrong. Fighting dogs actually LOVE fighting..they thrive on it. As i said..i have seen a few fights on video from turkey. That does not mean i advocate it. But none the less, i find the topic interesting.
By what moral standard are you judging? By YOUR moral standard lol???
delitemyheart 4 months ago
@delitemyheart
Again, I'll simply let your comments speak for themself.
StumpyOuch 4 months ago
@StumpyOuch As ill let yours speak for themselves too shill.
PATHETIC LOW LIFE!!!
delitemyheart 4 months ago
@delitemyheart
I don't see how that's proof that I've lied about anything.
Really, I think you believe the definition of the word "lie" is "Anything that I don't like and is at odds with my psychotic and paranoid rantings."
StumpyOuch 4 months ago
@StumpyOuch i don't see anything wrong in being schooled on which dogs can fight well etc. Tell me, say you were walking your doberman one day and a german shepherd was on the loose and came to attack your dog..isn't it good to know if your doberman will or will not survive??? Well i would, and thats why i find this topic interesting in an informative way. Because it happens all the time, there is always some dog thats escaped from its yard and is roaming the streets..i see it all the time!
delitemyheart 4 months ago
@delitemyheart
Your attempts to justify and rationalize your actions are almost as repulsive as the actions themselves.
Again, I see nothing there that proves that I've lied about anything. You, on the other hand.......
StumpyOuch 4 months ago
@StumpyOuch Firstly just WHAT are my actions???? And by what moral standard do you judge them by???
You stupid shill. Get your head out of your backside and wakeup!
delitemyheart 4 months ago
@delitemyheart
The actions of watching dog fighting and subsequently discussing at great length which dog breeds are better suited as being vicious killers and expressing admiration of the ability of one dog to violently kill another.
You seem to be having a difficult time following the conversation. Perhaps if you clicked on "view all comments" at the bottom right of your screen and rereading the entire conversation it will help you recall what we're talking about...
StumpyOuch 4 months ago
@StumpyOuch I have never expressed admiration for one dog killing another. Thats a lie that you have invented. In countries were dog fighting is accepted and legal..the dogs never fight to the death. The fights are broken up before that happens. And the dogs actually love fighting AND THATS A FACT!!!
And yes i have discussed which dogs are better suited to fighting etc. SO WHAT???????????????????????
delitemyheart 4 months ago
@delitemyheart
You seem to be an expert on dog fighting. Very odd considering you said I was lying earlier about you even watching dogfights....
Please do keep going on and on about how you think dog fighting is perfectly acceptable and how dogs loved to be torn up by another dog for the entertainment of some whacked out nutjob such as yourself.
StumpyOuch 4 months ago
@Stump..I did not say i had never seen dog fights. I said..."i do not watch dog fights" in other words shill..it's not something i watch on a regular basis. There is a difference between "watching" & "have seen"!
And dog fighting IS perfectly acceptable in some countries. And i would not have the gall to say that those countries have a wrong moral standard just because in your country it is un acceptable. Who do you think you are that you can judge others on what YOU think is morally acceptable?
delitemyheart 4 months ago
@StumpyOuch You moron..stop inventing lies about others!!!
delitemyheart 4 months ago
@delitemyheart Clearly a very strange, strange & mentally unbalanced person who has WAY TOO MUCH time on her hands & no life of her own. Quite sad & pathetic, actually~
promiseIsaih60 4 months ago
@StumpyOuch there is nothing more pathetic and evil than a low life like you who gets paid to tell lies everyday. You must be one seriously F%#@$# up person..let me tell ya!
delitemyheart 4 months ago
@delitemyheart
Except you've never proved anything I've said was a lie. Just the opposite, such as when you call me a liar and I provide concrete evidence to support my claims.
To refresh your memory: such as the past couple of hours when you said I was lying about you watching dog fighting videos, and I provided direct quotes and links to show exactly where you said them and now you admit that you have watched many dogfights.
Perhaps you simply don't understand the definition of "lie"?
StumpyOuch 4 months ago
Comment removed
delitemyheart 4 months ago
@delitemyheart
How exactly am I lying? I just posted multiple videos concerning dogfighting that clearly show your comments about how you watch dog fighting and how you think it's ok because dog fighting is legal in some countries.
It's all there for anyone who wants to see it.
StumpyOuch 4 months ago
@StumpyOuch i got nothing to hide sir lol lol, Go ahead. make my day shill. Go and read my comments. I have never said anywhere in my comments that i watch dogs fighting. That does not mean i have not seen dogs fighting..but i have never said that i watch dogs fighting and nor have i advocated it. I tell ya what..you sure are desperate arn't you shill? So desperate to try and find dirt on me. Go ahead lol, try harder? Can't you find anything better than dog fighting???
LOSER!!!!!
delitemyheart 4 months ago
@delitemyheart
Wow, seriously, you're going to deny you made those comments? Anyone at all can copy/paste those video addresses into youtube's search bar and see the videos and your comments for themselves.
Perhaps you're so mentally unstable you've forgotten you've made those comments?
StumpyOuch 4 months ago
@delitemyheart
Yes there is another dog that was bread to fight .. The "Presa Canario". The presa was developed on the canary islands specifically for dog fighting. Presa's are real bad arse..i've seen a lot of them on video fighting Pitbulls and man o man its always a very even & long fight right till the end. Neither of them will give in. They both truely love to fight!- delitemyheart
cont
StumpyOuch 4 months ago
All of these lovely quotes come from one single video; "Kangal vs Dogo Argentino" posted by sejomuric.
Anyone can go see your comments there. Perhaps you should go read them for yourself. Maybe they'll trigger your memory.
StumpyOuch 4 months ago
@StumpyOuch GO AHEAD SHILL TRY YOUR HARDEST!!!
Anyone can go read my comments..i got nothing to hide lol. GO AHEAD!!!!!
delitemyheart 4 months ago
@delitemyheart
That's an interesting set of morals you have there. So you feel that dogfighting is ok because it's legal in some countries? Domestic rape and violence and body mutilation are legal in some countries as well. Are you ok with those as well?
StumpyOuch 4 months ago
@StumpyOuch You have to respect other sovereign countries sovereign laws. Why should you impose what YOU think is right or wrong moraly onto another sovereign country which has a sovereign law???
By what moral standards is your idea based upon. Your moral standard is one that practices lying to the public. You get paid to do it. Tell me..why is your moral standard better????
delitemyheart 4 months ago
@delitemyheart
I'm just going to let your statements speak for themselves.
StumpyOuch 4 months ago
@StumpyOuch My statements are my staements. But what standard or morals do you judge my statements by By what YOU think is morally good. Hahahahaha PLZ......not from a liar who gets paid to lie all day long. I think YOUR morals stink. You are a very low animal.
Get a life shill!!!!!!
delitemyheart 4 months ago
@delitemyheart
watch?v=Aa8ziuygsxU
In my opinion the Kangal and the Alabai are the best fighting dogs period!!!-delitemyheart
I have seen about 30 big championship fights on video from turkey and russia where pitbulls fight kangals. And guess what..I have not seen ONE pitbull beat a kangal. And i'm telling you the honest truth!-delitemyheart
StumpyOuch 4 months ago
@delitemyheart AMEN !!! PREACH IT!! Can't you just TASTE her desperation??? I LOVIT!!!! ;)
promiseIsaih60 4 months ago
I LOVE how the shills say we're so 'loony' yet...*they always respond to us~ :) HAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!
promiseIsaih60 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@delitemyheart Prom started posting (what she thought was) my personal information online. I wouldn't have bothered if she hadn't started that. It's usually not a good idea to get on my radar.
She doesn't seem to realize there are at least 15 other people using the handle "sweetalker79" - and over a hundred calling themselves "sweetalker" - online. So she thinks I'm in Kentucky, she thinks I'm in Tennessee, she thinks I'm in Canada. She thinks my name is Chad or Angie or Bill or Rose.
sweetalker79 4 months ago 2
Once someone starts talking about "reptilian" race or "reptilian leaders", pretty much everything else they say should be looked at with great suspicion.
I've thought many conspiracies made sense to me, like 9/11, JFK assassination, moon landing hoax, Roswell, that sort of thing. But a little research goes a long way to cure stupidity. Not sure if there's a cure for the stupidity of Alex Jones and David Icke though. I think that's terminal.
:)
tommy605 4 months ago 7
@tommy605
I was looking at your channel page and thinking that you might be interested in looking into the psychology behind conspiracy theories. It really is amazing, if you're interested in that type of thing.
It's absolutely amazing that every single conspiracy theorist I've encountered on youtube has pretty much exactly the same argument. Doubly amazing, considering how much they prize individuality and scorn the "sheeple".
cont
StumpyOuch 4 months ago
One of the downsides of the internet is now these people can spread their lunacy from the warmth and comfort of their own home instead of standing out on the street corner ranting at passersby as they were confined to in the past.
StumpyOuch 4 months ago
@StumpyOuch Absolutely. I love looking at the psychology of almost everything. I looked at it for conspiracy theories too, and still do.It's fascinating.
It's predictable. The constant moving of the goal posts, claiming that a lack of evidence on the one side means it supports their cause automatically, even when there is no evidence to support their argument. Then it resorts to insults and accusing the ones arguing them that they're "paid" to trick people.
But I still love talking to them :)
tommy605 4 months ago 3
@StumpyOuch Absolutely. I love looking at the psychology of almost everything. I looked at it for conspiracy theories too, and still do.It's fascinating.
It's predictable. The constant moving of the goal posts, claiming that a lack of evidence on the one side means it supports their cause automatically, even when there is no evidence to support their argument. Then it resorts to insults and accusing the ones arguing them that they're "paid" to trick people.
But I still love talking to them :)
tommy605 4 months ago 4
This has been flagged as spam show
I often see stupid, racist, inflammatory posts. I either respond negatively or ignore them. I DON'T reply with "you're doing such a good job! you're wonderful! Keep up the good work!" and other such ass-kissing fluff you've posted to these morons.
sweetalker79 4 months ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
@promiseIsaih60 Who said I was in any danger? My beef with you was that YOU, calling yourself a good person, idolize and hold up as ideals men who cry for the rape & murder of people who disagree with them. You cheer them on, you hold them up as people to be listened to.
So in case you didn't "get it", I'm holding YOU responsible for what YOU post. Your posts are up there, in case you weren't looking. "zowaff, your fantastic!" "dawes, you're such a good friend!"
sweetalker79 4 months ago 2
@sweetalker79 People are FREE to post whatever they want. Who said I was cheering them on to rape & murder?? You're a very stange girl, to be sure. I never said dawes was a good friend but *if you hate him, he has to have some good in him ;) Zowaff puts out alot of info as I do so I stand by my comments just as all your little Merck shills friends can stand by you~ :)
promiseIsaih60 4 months ago
@promiseIsaih60 "Who said I was cheering them on to rape & murder?"
Uh, YOU did. Have you even SEEN this video? It's pretty clear.
sweetalker79 4 months ago 2
@sweetalker79 I've seen YOUR EDITED VERSION where I was Not cheering them on to rape & muder [nice desperate try tho ;)] I was cheering on their stand on vaccines~ This video really is a nice little piece of desperation. I like it!
promiseIsaih60 4 months ago
Hey Prom. Threats and (what you think is my) personal information will be removed.
There are a lot of "sweetalkers" and "sweetalker79s" online.
sweetalker79 4 months ago
I'M FLATTERED!! XOXOXOXO<3!! I think it's funny [& weird] how you somehow hold ME responsible for what OTHER YouTubers post, when I have no control over that but thanks anyway ;) Kisses!!!
promiseIsaih60 4 months ago
I like the pic of yourself playing with the Rubic's Cube. Very nice ! ;) Best part of the video actually!
promiseIsaih60 4 months ago
I notice you conviently left out the part where I told you *IF you thought you were in ANY danger to call the police. How CONVIENT for you! ;)
promiseIsaih60 4 months ago
Nutters, all of them.
Love the video description. :)
StumpyOuch 4 months ago 4