we have a great fact for you. others should certainly grab this game for at no cost at "ps3bigskydownload" - just open up google and key in "ps3bigskydownload". take a look at the 1st link and you will end up there. wish people value it.
besides the split second delay, do you (Thereisaspork) believe that the game itself plays faster and better on the ps3 compared to the ps2. for example, the lighting effects are phenomenal but gametrailers' review said that the the problem on the ps2 is the fact that it drops in frame rate to compensate for the effects of lighting and explosions on the walls. am I correct?
I don't really notice any improvement in the game itself. My understanding is that games are limited to whatever engine they're supposed to run on so playing a game that pushed the PS2 to its limits doesn't mean it'll play faster on a PS3.
Then again, I never really paid attention to that aspect of this game. It always ran relatively fine for me.
the only reason I ask is because I played it on the PS3 for a little bit and I could tell there was a massive fps increase on the ps3. My ps3 is the 80gb model, and I don't know if the 60gb model with the harmony engine would play it the same as the ps2 which is built with the harmony engine.
LOL that's cool. I haven't played this game. It looks great. I may go out and buy it. The first 2 movies really left you wanting to know what would happen next and the last was just a shot em up.
I know what you mean. Sometimes I wish they had released Path of Neo on the PS3 and taken advantage of the graphics and expanded the game play. Still, no guarantees that things would have been better.
Oh well, as you said, at least the movies were great.
Oh. Wait. I thought you mean the 3D installments were disappointing. My bad. Anyway, I found Revolutions the most visually stunning, but certainly the weakest of the trilogy overall.
we have a great fact for you. others should certainly grab this game for at no cost at "ps3bigskydownload" - just open up google and key in "ps3bigskydownload". take a look at the 1st link and you will end up there. wish people value it.
IanHernandezg 2 years ago
jaja path of neo its easy : D
tiracia 2 years ago
game looks cool
07033582437 2 years ago
besides the split second delay, do you (Thereisaspork) believe that the game itself plays faster and better on the ps3 compared to the ps2. for example, the lighting effects are phenomenal but gametrailers' review said that the the problem on the ps2 is the fact that it drops in frame rate to compensate for the effects of lighting and explosions on the walls. am I correct?
anyone else who can confirm this please respond
budfiend4627 3 years ago
I don't really notice any improvement in the game itself. My understanding is that games are limited to whatever engine they're supposed to run on so playing a game that pushed the PS2 to its limits doesn't mean it'll play faster on a PS3.
Then again, I never really paid attention to that aspect of this game. It always ran relatively fine for me.
Thereisaspork 3 years ago
the only reason I ask is because I played it on the PS3 for a little bit and I could tell there was a massive fps increase on the ps3. My ps3 is the 80gb model, and I don't know if the 60gb model with the harmony engine would play it the same as the ps2 which is built with the harmony engine.
budfiend4627 3 years ago
do the herb guy one, i want to poop the " can you tell me where shop is?" part
MilkR0und 3 years ago
If I can rip more game footage properly, I will.
Thereisaspork 3 years ago
LOL that's cool. I haven't played this game. It looks great. I may go out and buy it. The first 2 movies really left you wanting to know what would happen next and the last was just a shot em up.
RAPSUCKS1738 3 years ago
This was a great movie although the 3 rd installment was a disappointment
RAPSUCKS1738 3 years ago
I know what you mean. Sometimes I wish they had released Path of Neo on the PS3 and taken advantage of the graphics and expanded the game play. Still, no guarantees that things would have been better.
Oh well, as you said, at least the movies were great.
Thereisaspork 3 years ago
I agree, the graphics engine on the PS3 could have had a literal blast (lol explosion play on words)
(I know I'm commenting on a post from ten months ago....I don't normally comment on youtube.)
budfiend4627 3 years ago
Oh. Wait. I thought you mean the 3D installments were disappointing. My bad. Anyway, I found Revolutions the most visually stunning, but certainly the weakest of the trilogy overall.
Thereisaspork 3 years ago