They have bezel compensation, in which the areas displayed are spaced apart by a few invisible pixels to compensate. I'd be more worried that in the case of an even number of screens in either direction, a first-person shooter would have the crosshairs RIGHT between the two monitors!
@confusioncaption even tho this is pretty nice, i rather have a FULL screen than thos annoying bars... maybie a company should try developing a monitor that can handle that RES...
@Ishmum123456 Nope. If the point of this was to have a bigger screen you could just by a huge HD tv and it would look better than a projector. The setup here is for giving you a sort of peripheral vision within the game. Also I don't think money is a concern for the people that would consider a set up like this.
@odracir1986 Yea... That's why there is no AMD single card better than the GTX 580... Honestly, I am not an Nvidia fanboy, but you're trolling hard on that one.
@Darkteammadfiz Hahahaha Yes....Try with AMD RADEON HD 6990 4 GB DDR5 video memory......There's no other single card better like this. I'm proud to be an AMD RADEON USER XD!
@odracir1986 I hope you're trolling... It isn't even a single card, it's a dual graphics card... Actually if you really want to compare it, compare atleast the GTX 580 with the HD 6970. Or even better, the GTX 590 vs the HD 6990. And the 6990 is loud, maybe too loud IMO...
@odracir1986 Lolwut? First, I say it's loud, I've heard it and yes it's loud according to motherboardsorg, Hd 6990 is comparable with the GTX 590 and the real competitor for AMD of the GTX 580 is the HD 6970, AMD's fastest single card (single card is not the HD 6990, it's a dual graphics card). So please... ¬¬
Would definitely be cheaper, and without those annoying bezels, but for eyefinity the fact that the monitors curve around you shows the view more realistically rather than one large flat panel.
Not worth it for me, but for the people already putting 1000's into that's what they want.
unless they create a new 2 in 1 display monitor FPS gamers will forever be using 3 monitor setup. 6 monitors is cool but most rpgs and fps are focused around the center of the images being used. having those 3 inch spacer lined inbetween monitors ruins this for us gamers. very nice tech but ill be going with 3 monitors instead of 6
(2/2)Unless you are running an airport flight schedule and surveillance system
(in this case, you would need a highly complex matrix controller/system that would have to output to hundreds or thousands of display screens), you really are in no position to bash ATI's technology.
Sidenote: I'm not a fanboy. I use an EVGA (Fermi) Nvidia GTS 450. I would've easily purchased an AMD, if it weren't for the rare $80 sale price of the Nvidia.
Get what suits you. Don't bash what you don't understand.
So what if there are bezels? Some people here are missing the fact that this has a purpose outside of gaming.
If you are running multiple productivity applications/ analyzing and comparing graphs and data from multiple windows, you would only use one application per-monitor anyway.
Besides, as technology gets cheaper, and bezel-less (or very thinly framed)
monitors come down in price, it only gets better.
For multiple monitors, Nvidia and Matrox can't compete at this price range.
Haha looks like shit because of the borders. All I was thinking was "Borders. Frames." Lol. The tech is nice and it's not ATI's fault but atm, this is effin useless.
thats stupid ..what abt borders of the monitor wont it interfere with my gaming expereience ..
I am not an nvidia fanboy ..but they just know what ppl want ..3d vision is one such a technology ..the guys at ati ..just want to have a new tech up and running so they can just showcase and market it. The eyefinity is just the sort of trash technology ati produces..
What i recommend ...have a real hardcore gamer sit in on your meetings..
set the monitors up(i use 3 monitors only) and it works it should on any linux version ( i tested only on ubuntu, kubuntu, fedora and opensuse and on the latest versions)
Folks who think LCD tvs and projectors can match this, they're seriously mistaken. TVs can probably never match the response times needed by games that monitors offer, and whatever the screen size may be they just can't give a higher resolution than 1080...
For games like these (racing games too) it makes sense to use an odd number of monitors for an unhindered view. Stacking em up vertically gives a much more balanced resolution of 3240x1920 with 3 monitors. I believe samsung has come out with seamless LCDs, gotta check them out.
Ok. Weird question... the Gigabyte card I got only has 1 display port instead of 2. I got it maybe 4 months ago. I still need to buy a second card before I buy the rest of the monitors but should I go ahead and trash the card I have now and get the new ones with 2 display ports? I have no idea what kind of setup I need to have with only 1 display Port per card.
@ChiggsPCtech Have you ever seen a 60inch LCD TV? Have you ever played games with it? It looks just like this, except there's none of those stupid lines in between the monitors.
6 monitors looks fancy but it means you have a seam through the all important center. It's the same reason why no one games on two monitors. Three works just fine.
It could be a lot better to just make a type of 3 or 6 lcd panel frame where we could just buy and plug in the panels of our choice. Of course the panels should have no frames at least not so thick. The gaps and thick monitor frames bug me to hell. Like this you can't even align them straight.
everyone, gaming on TV is horrible! if you have a 50" tv with 1080p then it's really horrible resolution per inch. I use a 24" with the same resolution, and that is half the size! this is 2400p on what is 50" ish size all together, which makes this the same resolution per inch as my 24", and that makes it so fucking awesome!
@combatdstar then make a six screened single screen, meaning take all the six screens out of the monitor cases and lay them withing a pixel of the next set of screen. or just make one screen with huge ass rez, the gaps suck and are just a lack of demand for a screen with a 5760x2400 rez
@codeythesilent No, 1080p is 1080 horizontal lines of pixels and it is progressive scan. A 55" 1080p tv has alot less pixels per inch than a 27" 1080p tv.
@Jsilverstreak Its all about the field of view and surrounding your vision within the game experience. That said, i wouldn't use multiple monitors like that, maybe with one big center monitor, but now ive got a 46" 3D TV 3' from my face and i love it. I come from a 2560x1600 30" and a 1920x1200 17" laptop, so i know what im missing and i still love the 3D with the lower resolution.
everybody crying bcuz of the bars but if you play a ggame your focused and the bars will disappear i have a 3 screen setup and when i play i dont even notice them i cant say how many times eyefinity saved my ass in battlefield bad company 2
I hate the gaps. Its pointless to me. Someone should develop a high resolution screen that is flexible. It can be done- it would involve making the screen out of connected pixels that were therefor flexible... Now, if i wanted an immersive experience, Imagine being able to create a stretched sphere around you......... Eve would never be the same.
@dinosaurus1337 I think your right. but the only reason the gaps have to be their is i think because then you get "panaramic display" so you can see more then just like say 90* Angels... you know my friend has a set up with mini HD. and he can see almost 360 he see's 270 degree so it makes sneak attacks from behind almost limitless haha but yeah sorry for spelling tired off to bed!
@dinosaurus1337 Agreed on that, but the only advantage of having all 6 monitors is that the pixels of each monitor wont be as stretched as the pixels of one single large monitor.
@dinosaurus1337 You'd think so, and that was my idea. I wanted the same results of this setup with a 120" projector, wrong! If you have a 1920x1080 and want to mimic a setup with three 16:9 monitors in landscape setup (48:9 total aspect ratio). To get the 48:9 ratio, you'd have to sacrifice 720 of your projector's vertical pixels and run at 1920x360. At 1920x360, your 120" projection would be 118" x 22" at 16 pixels per inch (PPI). Big loss there so either dual projectors or this.
@dinosaurus1337 .... no.. i can't be effed explaining... but no.. one big screen wouldn't display anywhere near as much.. its about resolution... go look it up.
@dinosaurus1337 One thing that AMD did recently, you may have seen on newegg is that they used HD projectors instead of screens which produces a seamless view. It was amazing.
soooooooo many wrong comments. Agreed the border of the screen as in the physical object IS in the way for that I dislike. HOWEVER comments like "if sniper behind border..." is wrong, the screen is split exactly, so where one row of pixels ends the next row starts on the screen below. There is never a time that a section of the screen is "hidden" in anyway.
i actually never try it but i think when you start playing you will forgot about the black in the middle. Moreover, i like the curving of those monitors , you just feel you are inside the game. but i still won't buy six monitors. i will just use my sharp lcd 40" tv.
This in my opinion is the dumbest idea ever, sure the high res is cool and gives you bragging rights and all but you're playing with a bunch of black shit in the way. I can see that causing many issues when gaming, I mean you'd have snipers in an FPS behind one of the borders and you wouldn't see him and just no, it would not be a pleasant gaming experience.
Instead of making one big screen, they decided to stack up 6 and have borders in the middle. really take the technology that makes it look good and have on giant screen?
you would think that if they can do panoramic visuals, they could remove the panels from the frames and have virtually borderless multi screen,,, its not that hard to run a lcd panel frameless.. oh well.. c'mon guys.. try it out.. thanks
The problem is when you have even number of monitors (like 2, 4, 6, etc) because the crosshair is right in the black border.
Uneven amount of monitors is better (3, 9) because you can keep the crosshair centered in the middle monitor, and use the rest just for panoramic vision.
lol those dell monitors had thick boarders and wtf was an xbox doing in the back ground
XXXSnIpErXXXJD 2 weeks ago
@XXXSnIpErXXXJD AMD's gpu is in the XBOX360
ReverendMake 1 week ago
i can say just " cool "
puidedrac44 2 weeks ago
Must be crap playing with the borders of the monitors getting in your way
ThalesII 3 weeks ago 2
in this demo we want to look at the center of the view, which is not there since there is a monitor edge
kommdochinmeinenstaa 3 weeks ago
for gaming, no thanks, the gaps between the displays would be too much of a draw back. Hawever, do the same with edgeless, screens and I'm in!
sloosh6000 3 weeks ago
@sloosh6000
They have bezel compensation, in which the areas displayed are spaced apart by a few invisible pixels to compensate. I'd be more worried that in the case of an even number of screens in either direction, a first-person shooter would have the crosshairs RIGHT between the two monitors!
Thisismyrofl 3 weeks ago
@Thisismyrofl I'd guess have an odd number, but not stacked like in the video, unless there were three in a column, that would be pretty cool.
sloosh6000 3 weeks ago
i use nvidia BIatch
TransDrive50 4 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Sweet gta sa lets play it has all the modern warfare characters. go check it out just paste this after youtube . com... cmon dont be afraid.
/watch?v=-TXWf8-0HwY&list=PL664B80FDEC5D8368&feature=mh_lolz
BadBornGamers 4 weeks ago
Why not just get a 50" tv? :/
MrFreebrowsing 1 month ago
@MrFreebrowsing Resolution.
DaMasterSarge 1 month ago
@MrFreebrowsing A 50" tv can only be 1920x1080
confusioncaption 1 month ago
@confusioncaption even tho this is pretty nice, i rather have a FULL screen than thos annoying bars... maybie a company should try developing a monitor that can handle that RES...
BadBornGamers 4 weeks ago
Any Fast Streaming with that? Thats a High Resolution whats the FrapsV3.3 Check on that?more FreeWare and Freescaling it seems?
GeckoDude2010 1 month ago
how retarded. make bigger or borderless screens.
flurkoneko 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
5670 512 mb gddr5 OR
6670 1gb ddr3???
which is better for gaming???
plz help
dennyvevo 1 month ago
He sounds like dane cook
AgentKain 2 months ago
If I ever buy this amount of screens, I will buy 9 so that the crosshair is on the center of the middle screen, instead of on a seam
RedArmorLabs 2 months ago
i don't like the frames between the screens .. this setup has to be seamless
vrshowdown 2 months ago
for what?? 1 MONITOR CAN PLAY BETTER THAN 6 MONITOR
edge20091234 2 months ago
Expensive
Minetainment 3 months ago
if i become a computer engineer;or anything involving computers; do i have to tuck in my shirt?
xy274 3 months ago
HAWX 1
xorz57 3 months ago
Haha, I use 3 22" monitors, and upload game recordings, check it out ;)
HardstyleLN 3 months ago
No my profile 2monitor ATI Eyefinity
krzywyzielarz 3 months ago
This guy makes me embarrassed to be an AMD fan/
ashinms 4 months ago
Here's a Perfectly Working, Cheaper and Better Solution-- USE A PROJECTOR!!!!!
Ishmum123456 4 months ago
@Ishmum123456 Nope. If the point of this was to have a bigger screen you could just by a huge HD tv and it would look better than a projector. The setup here is for giving you a sort of peripheral vision within the game. Also I don't think money is a concern for the people that would consider a set up like this.
xynth101088 3 months ago
@xynth101088 thanks for being friendly and showing me the point of this!!!!! I was expecting you to flame me lol youtube is full of haters/flamers!!
Ishmum123456 3 months ago
porn must be awesome on the eyefinity. cliphunter here we come
slowbus 4 months ago
Oh no the world is running out of resources. I know let's turn on more monitors!
DerivitivKahnEQ2 4 months ago
FUCK NVIDIOTS......AMD IT'S A BEAST, NO COMPARISSON WITH NVIDIOTS.
odracir1986 4 months ago 2
@odracir1986 Yea... That's why there is no AMD single card better than the GTX 580... Honestly, I am not an Nvidia fanboy, but you're trolling hard on that one.
Darkteammadfiz 3 months ago
@Darkteammadfiz Hahahaha Yes....Try with AMD RADEON HD 6990 4 GB DDR5 video memory......There's no other single card better like this. I'm proud to be an AMD RADEON USER XD!
odracir1986 3 months ago
@odracir1986 I hope you're trolling... It isn't even a single card, it's a dual graphics card... Actually if you really want to compare it, compare atleast the GTX 580 with the HD 6970. Or even better, the GTX 590 vs the HD 6990. And the 6990 is loud, maybe too loud IMO...
Darkteammadfiz 3 months ago
@Darkteammadfiz Search in youtube by "AMD RADEON HD 6990" and you will see that Nvidia, it's too much loudly. I'm HAPPY WITH AMD RADEON ;) thanks!
odracir1986 3 months ago
@odracir1986 Lolwut? First, I say it's loud, I've heard it and yes it's loud according to motherboardsorg, Hd 6990 is comparable with the GTX 590 and the real competitor for AMD of the GTX 580 is the HD 6970, AMD's fastest single card (single card is not the HD 6990, it's a dual graphics card). So please... ¬¬
Darkteammadfiz 3 months ago
would'nt a 40inch tv be cheaper and better?
ht448 4 months ago 2
@ht448
Would definitely be cheaper, and without those annoying bezels, but for eyefinity the fact that the monitors curve around you shows the view more realistically rather than one large flat panel.
Not worth it for me, but for the people already putting 1000's into that's what they want.
Morosysin 4 months ago
I remember when I got Top Gun for the NES. Goddamn aircraft carrier landing!
profolactic 4 months ago 31
OMFG!!! are kiding me 6 screens???
migbess 4 months ago
just wait until they release the flexible oled screens. then you will really get a surround/immersive screen
50kT 4 months ago 23
unless they create a new 2 in 1 display monitor FPS gamers will forever be using 3 monitor setup. 6 monitors is cool but most rpgs and fps are focused around the center of the images being used. having those 3 inch spacer lined inbetween monitors ruins this for us gamers. very nice tech but ill be going with 3 monitors instead of 6
SeanofZeus 4 months ago
So many bezels, so little time.
spielbergandlucas 5 months ago
Pointless
MrGoochable 5 months ago
Ya I gotta say 2x3 setup is not ideal for gaming, You cant see center of screen cause of bezels for monitors. Granted for productivity this is great.
mikeallensonntag 5 months ago
LOL theres a whole line in the middle (1-2 inches) thats a let down.
ribnarak 5 months ago
(2/2)Unless you are running an airport flight schedule and surveillance system
(in this case, you would need a highly complex matrix controller/system that would have to output to hundreds or thousands of display screens), you really are in no position to bash ATI's technology.
Sidenote: I'm not a fanboy. I use an EVGA (Fermi) Nvidia GTS 450. I would've easily purchased an AMD, if it weren't for the rare $80 sale price of the Nvidia.
Get what suits you. Don't bash what you don't understand.
recycledpaperboy 5 months ago
(1/2)
So what if there are bezels? Some people here are missing the fact that this has a purpose outside of gaming.
If you are running multiple productivity applications/ analyzing and comparing graphs and data from multiple windows, you would only use one application per-monitor anyway.
Besides, as technology gets cheaper, and bezel-less (or very thinly framed)
monitors come down in price, it only gets better.
For multiple monitors, Nvidia and Matrox can't compete at this price range.
recycledpaperboy 5 months ago
Haha looks like shit because of the borders. All I was thinking was "Borders. Frames." Lol. The tech is nice and it's not ATI's fault but atm, this is effin useless.
levlobotomy 5 months ago
if only he could remove those lcd border,if that is the case,i'm quite impressed
exsinner 5 months ago
Yeah, that's exactly how I want to play my games, with 2" worth of plastic between everything.
You ATI fanboys enjoy.
RalphCQ 5 months ago
@RalphCQ ATI and Nvidia both have bezels, when your playing it you really dont notice it that much
kingdom9214 5 months ago
@kingdom9214 I did hear a while back that they were gonna make bezel-less monitors, but I guess they forgot.
The video with the multiple projectors w. eyefinity was pretty impressive, btw.
RalphCQ 5 months ago
@RalphCQ ya theres a few moded frames you can buy depending on your monitor
kingdom9214 5 months ago
thats stupid ..what abt borders of the monitor wont it interfere with my gaming expereience ..
I am not an nvidia fanboy ..but they just know what ppl want ..3d vision is one such a technology ..the guys at ati ..just want to have a new tech up and running so they can just showcase and market it. The eyefinity is just the sort of trash technology ati produces..
What i recommend ...have a real hardcore gamer sit in on your meetings..
And simply ask him what he wud expect from a gpu
paulthecoolest 5 months ago
I'd rather have a 5760x2400 60" monitor. -.-
lazzer408 5 months ago
I thought manufacturers were going to make smaller bezel monitors?
bigbradford69 5 months ago
this guy talks funny
dbzball 5 months ago
NVIDIA IS BETTER THAN AMD
(lets see how much replies im gonna get with this)
gijsjeradijsje10 5 months ago
@gijsjeradijsje10 None
ThoseTesTis 5 months ago
@gijsjeradijsje10 Don't you mean ATI?
HoComputersInc 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
as lng as u have the propretary drivers installed
they give u the catalyst control center
set the monitors up(i use 3 monitors only) and it works it should on any linux version ( i tested only on ubuntu, kubuntu, fedora and opensuse and on the latest versions)
cojeapetru 6 months ago
Just get screens that have less edges on the side :$
SmexMuffins 6 months ago
couldn't you remove the edges a bit more smoothly of the screen?
SantizClaus 6 months ago
thats great. Would it work on Ubuntu?
caiolagana 6 months ago
@caiolagana jajaja stupid
chabelito1992 6 months ago
Comment removed
cojeapetru 6 months ago
hey guys this is a great website that shows reviews on many top-of-the line computer components please visit computerbuilding(dot)webs(dot)com
itsahod 6 months ago
ill just stick to my 29inch hd 1080p easier for me aiming =p
Gamet00b 6 months ago
you could remove the bezel
matteuklol 6 months ago
Folks who think LCD tvs and projectors can match this, they're seriously mistaken. TVs can probably never match the response times needed by games that monitors offer, and whatever the screen size may be they just can't give a higher resolution than 1080...
bprasann11 6 months ago
For games like these (racing games too) it makes sense to use an odd number of monitors for an unhindered view. Stacking em up vertically gives a much more balanced resolution of 3240x1920 with 3 monitors. I believe samsung has come out with seamless LCDs, gotta check them out.
bprasann11 6 months ago
You get used to the gaps after a while.
JohnnyKpro 6 months ago
Can you guys please stop replying to that post?
dinosaurus1337 6 months ago
Ok. Weird question... the Gigabyte card I got only has 1 display port instead of 2. I got it maybe 4 months ago. I still need to buy a second card before I buy the rest of the monitors but should I go ahead and trash the card I have now and get the new ones with 2 display ports? I have no idea what kind of setup I need to have with only 1 display Port per card.
here is the model number. GV-R685OC-1GD
descrasnezul 6 months ago
But can it run crysis?
Nunski17 6 months ago
game freak
liljoe470 6 months ago
so over 3d bullshit
Mynameistux 6 months ago
@ChiggsPCtech Have you ever seen a 60inch LCD TV? Have you ever played games with it? It looks just like this, except there's none of those stupid lines in between the monitors.
TheMugenFox 7 months ago
@TheMugenFox it really doesnt. not graphically at least this has three times the vertical res. and twice the horizontal res. as the HD 60" LCD TV.
this setup would be much better with borderless monitors or monitors with smaller borders
carsonh 6 months ago
What happen when the crosshair is in between the screen
YJH1995 7 months ago
@YJH1995 we see the monitor bodies..but those gaps do not exist in the computer so the crosshair will never be inbetween the screens
carsonh 6 months ago
in my opinion, 6 screens at 2400p is better than one screen at 1080p (more detail, dumbfucks)
UrGFsTaco 7 months ago
a 60inch 3DTV is much, much better, and probably cheaper
TheMugenFox 7 months ago
@TheMugenFox But the resolution of 60" is only 1080p, I think the eyefinity is after the resolution.
emotionalpunk101390 6 months ago
Look at how retarded I am, I'm going to use an even number of screens to make sure my crosshair is on the fucking edge of the monitor.
sunyboy333 7 months ago 57
6 monitors looks fancy but it means you have a seam through the all important center. It's the same reason why no one games on two monitors. Three works just fine.
nikanj 7 months ago
anyone says a big screen or a projector is better is an idiot.
i would go on to explaining why, but why bother?
SedoSan 7 months ago
they want to sell all the screens on the markets with this idiot idea
i'd rather buy a big screen rather than the borders on the edges of the screens
KSAzone 7 months ago
He sounds like Dane Cook** Wtf is up with youtube autocorrection.....
ancientar 7 months ago
He sounds like Dance Cook*
ancientar 7 months ago
He sounds like Dance Cook :)
ancientar 7 months ago
please use joistick playing with planes
qiplayer 7 months ago
lol,guys go buy a FULL HD 40'' TV.....what a waste of money......you need more gpu's and more screens....just buy a f**cking tv
um4kemyd4y 7 months ago
Pros: The resolution of each screen to make a super sized ultra hdtv = awesome
Cons: big black bars between the screens ruins the eyecandy
dhfhs2 7 months ago
It could be a lot better to just make a type of 3 or 6 lcd panel frame where we could just buy and plug in the panels of our choice. Of course the panels should have no frames at least not so thick. The gaps and thick monitor frames bug me to hell. Like this you can't even align them straight.
artifiz 8 months ago
@artifiz They do have monitors with very thin frames just for that. I was looking into them long time ago but they were priced at like 400 a piece.
Triple88a 7 months ago
everyone, gaming on TV is horrible! if you have a 50" tv with 1080p then it's really horrible resolution per inch. I use a 24" with the same resolution, and that is half the size! this is 2400p on what is 50" ish size all together, which makes this the same resolution per inch as my 24", and that makes it so fucking awesome!
miki9017 8 months ago 6
If you do this you need frameless monitors... its like your playing a games through a huge fcking window..
DC180 8 months ago
just play on a large tv instead?
NezkiHD 8 months ago
@NezkiHD You wouldn't get the same resolution as this. Most tvs go up to 1080p, this is 2400p
combatdstar 8 months ago 38
@combatdstar then make a six screened single screen, meaning take all the six screens out of the monitor cases and lay them withing a pixel of the next set of screen. or just make one screen with huge ass rez, the gaps suck and are just a lack of demand for a screen with a 5760x2400 rez
matthias2986 6 months ago
@combatdstar how about a projector wud that work
paulthecoolest 5 months ago
@paulthecoolest No, that still isn't the same resolution. It's going to have way less clarity and detail compared to the six monitors.
combatdstar 5 months ago
@combatdstar
the 1080 p is pixels per square inch, not resolution. D3RP.
codeythesilent 5 months ago
@codeythesilent No, 1080p is 1080 horizontal lines of pixels and it is progressive scan. A 55" 1080p tv has alot less pixels per inch than a 27" 1080p tv.
neelybd 5 months ago
@neelybd
Actually, it's VERTICAL lines not horizontal. 1080p resolution is 1920 wide x 1080 high.
gamewizard 4 months ago
@codeythesilent lol you're an idiot.
wakeupitshere 5 months ago
@wakeupitshere
derpety derpy derp, douche bag.
codeythesilent 5 months ago
Yes we get it the gaps kill it , buy a projector blah blah blah shut up!
This is technology testing in monitors if you want eyefinity without gaps go buy your damn projector and pls shut up.
jaksterDC 8 months ago
no simulation machine is going to have screen borders. You would be better off making a mini imax screen
paintballgundown8 8 months ago
Really dont like Efinity idea..I rather play on a projector..HOnestly, monitor side panels really disturbs my gaming!
mtsacricky09 8 months ago
why would i want to have a 50 inch screen 3 feet from my face
you cant even see the pixels on a 1080p display from 5 feet away
Jsilverstreak 8 months ago
@Jsilverstreak Its all about the field of view and surrounding your vision within the game experience. That said, i wouldn't use multiple monitors like that, maybe with one big center monitor, but now ive got a 46" 3D TV 3' from my face and i love it. I come from a 2560x1600 30" and a 1920x1200 17" laptop, so i know what im missing and i still love the 3D with the lower resolution.
8Libertine8 8 months ago
i think ill stick to my 4k 3d
75 inch 3d tv when it comes out later this year
Jsilverstreak 8 months ago
why does noone seem to care about the INCH WIDE BORDERS CRISS CROSSING THE SCREEN!
danthemanzizzle 8 months ago
i think this is one big reason why i would never do a Eyefinity setup the gaps is what bugs me the most can't stand it.
Zenshiro14 8 months ago
why not... oh i dont know... Um .. just get a 55in screen??
TheStarKing9 8 months ago
everybody crying bcuz of the bars but if you play a ggame your focused and the bars will disappear i have a 3 screen setup and when i play i dont even notice them i cant say how many times eyefinity saved my ass in battlefield bad company 2
roshawn1111 8 months ago
I hate the gaps. Its pointless to me. Someone should develop a high resolution screen that is flexible. It can be done- it would involve making the screen out of connected pixels that were therefor flexible... Now, if i wanted an immersive experience, Imagine being able to create a stretched sphere around you......... Eve would never be the same.
Sol0tone 8 months ago
i have 64inch plasma tv and complete massive surround system which truly awesome for my ps3. i was just planning to do this on my desktop.
ichisuke03 8 months ago
Just buy a single 100" screen with that resolution. No silly bars. Problem solved.
donconco 8 months ago
@Morphadr0n hhaah you're pathetic
darkspl 8 months ago
I like more a 30'' inch screen...
OffRoadVama 8 months ago
is this a software, what the picture bring in 3d ? ? ?
HarryPotterFan018 9 months ago
will 3d work with ati card?
darkspl 9 months ago
@darkspl lol
DoctorHAXx64 8 months ago
Aspect ratio is less if you only have 1 big monitor. There are very thin bezel monitors, but they cost a lot lot lot more.
WaffleSMP 9 months ago
the gaps bug me. Couldn't you just make one big screen? I know it would cost more but wouldn't it be easier?
dinosaurus1337 9 months ago 87
@dinosaurus1337 thats what i was thinking lol looks kind of stupid with 6 of them.. one big one would be nice for games and movies
carguy05vids 9 months ago
@dinosaurus1337 cost for that much resolution in one monitor would be astronomical, about 90,000 plus. can you afford that much?
nepalihercules 8 months ago
@dinosaurus1337 they just need to create a monitor has has no junk on the sides
d3tach3d 8 months ago
@dinosaurus1337 lol just go to the store and buy you an 52 '' LED TV with input for pc ;) it do exacly the same buddy !
Fayner4 8 months ago
@Fayner4 as far as I know, a TV has a lower resolution. So I'd be better with a couple monitors on my own :\
ThatDrunkGuru 8 months ago
@ThatDrunkGuru lol if you have an old tv , obviously yes hehe , juste take a new 3d LED TV its gonna be better ;)
Fayner4 8 months ago
@Fayner4 hehe
ThatDrunkGuru 8 months ago
@dinosaurus1337 i tried once at a convention, YES the gaps disorient me
daemonhunter100 8 months ago
@dinosaurus1337 gaming monitors can do that
dunndudebemelol 8 months ago
@dinosaurus1337 there are tvs that are 4k and 3d
thats around 7000x4000
there a few thousand though
Jsilverstreak 8 months ago
@dinosaurus1337 I think your right. but the only reason the gaps have to be their is i think because then you get "panaramic display" so you can see more then just like say 90* Angels... you know my friend has a set up with mini HD. and he can see almost 360 he see's 270 degree so it makes sneak attacks from behind almost limitless haha but yeah sorry for spelling tired off to bed!
SaberDragon565 8 months ago
@dinosaurus1337 Agreed on that, but the only advantage of having all 6 monitors is that the pixels of each monitor wont be as stretched as the pixels of one single large monitor.
Still, I think the gaps kill it.
OSeuKumiama 8 months ago
@dinosaurus1337 You'd think so, and that was my idea. I wanted the same results of this setup with a 120" projector, wrong! If you have a 1920x1080 and want to mimic a setup with three 16:9 monitors in landscape setup (48:9 total aspect ratio). To get the 48:9 ratio, you'd have to sacrifice 720 of your projector's vertical pixels and run at 1920x360. At 1920x360, your 120" projection would be 118" x 22" at 16 pixels per inch (PPI). Big loss there so either dual projectors or this.
hanger18 8 months ago
@dinosaurus1337 There are screens like that, they are VERY expensive.
lillhonken 8 months ago
@lillhonken monitors* blah!
lillhonken 8 months ago
@dinosaurus1337 If it was one big screen, you'd be missing out on the high resolution that Eyefinity provides.
ThalmightyOne 7 months ago
@dinosaurus1337 not possible right now
GR3B3N 7 months ago
@dinosaurus1337 you dont get that resolution with one big screen.
MrDiscokiss1 7 months ago
@dinosaurus1337 .... no.. i can't be effed explaining... but no.. one big screen wouldn't display anywhere near as much.. its about resolution... go look it up.
jnagtube 7 months ago
@dinosaurus1337 you could just get 6 monitors without a frame
1993gandy 6 months ago
@dinosaurus1337 the gaps are freaking annoying. And the monitors aren't even in this video. A big 4K TV would be 100 times better than this crap.
axelmckaese2 6 months ago
@dinosaurus1337
easier in what sense? carring it around?
TrueDesireHD 6 months ago
@dinosaurus1337 132 CM LCD ^^ the best is SHARP
Nvidia9700MGT 6 months ago
@dinosaurus1337 er u just dnt get it retard, the gaps are amazing and u too poor so gd luck loser
humsposemofo 6 months ago
@humsposemofo QUIT YOUR TROLLIN, BOY! DONT MAKE ME GO OVER THERE AGAIN!
stinkkingstink1 6 months ago
@dinosaurus1337 One thing that AMD did recently, you may have seen on newegg is that they used HD projectors instead of screens which produces a seamless view. It was amazing.
stinkkingstink1 6 months ago
Ok,now make it one giant screen.
Martinntoxx 9 months ago
soooooooo many wrong comments. Agreed the border of the screen as in the physical object IS in the way for that I dislike. HOWEVER comments like "if sniper behind border..." is wrong, the screen is split exactly, so where one row of pixels ends the next row starts on the screen below. There is never a time that a section of the screen is "hidden" in anyway.
stonerscolony 9 months ago
whats 3D about this?! all 2D?!
KennethKenda 9 months ago
With Eyefinity I can enjoy doing what I love most at the same time:
fapping and COD (but not fapping over COD)
CaptainHalodude 9 months ago
need to find monitors with a thin edge
goofiegoofball 9 months ago
i actually never try it but i think when you start playing you will forgot about the black in the middle. Moreover, i like the curving of those monitors , you just feel you are inside the game. but i still won't buy six monitors. i will just use my sharp lcd 40" tv.
SAIDHUMOUD 9 months ago
ye the borders of the screens ruin it
mangomag1c 9 months ago
1 word...."BEAST"
thePCgamingZone 9 months ago
This in my opinion is the dumbest idea ever, sure the high res is cool and gives you bragging rights and all but you're playing with a bunch of black shit in the way. I can see that causing many issues when gaming, I mean you'd have snipers in an FPS behind one of the borders and you wouldn't see him and just no, it would not be a pleasant gaming experience.
HairyDONG69 9 months ago
I don't see the attraction to an obstructed view and wouldn't spend my hard earned money on this technology. I'll stick with my 60 inch plasma!
BEARB8TER 9 months ago
lol ya really just get a projector nub your a dumb ass for buying that many montiors and haveing that many Fin borders
catpoOo666 9 months ago
Just give me the 6 projectors and ill be good. that solves the black borders in the middle.
RockylvrCP 9 months ago
Instead of making one big screen, they decided to stack up 6 and have borders in the middle. really take the technology that makes it look good and have on giant screen?
therunescapemasters1 9 months ago
you would think that if they can do panoramic visuals, they could remove the panels from the frames and have virtually borderless multi screen,,, its not that hard to run a lcd panel frameless.. oh well.. c'mon guys.. try it out.. thanks
markair 9 months ago
five thousand!
master64k 9 months ago
Dude's creepy.
GAWproductions 10 months ago
or you could have one big tv
Dylanorr16063 10 months ago
The problem is when you have even number of monitors (like 2, 4, 6, etc) because the crosshair is right in the black border.
Uneven amount of monitors is better (3, 9) because you can keep the crosshair centered in the middle monitor, and use the rest just for panoramic vision.
That being said, where's the 3D ?
xnaGames 10 months ago
a 4K projector or single screen would be better.
ut2k4wikichici 10 months ago
why no beamer??`
Deathproof87DK 10 months ago
It's the black boarders. I wouldn't want that even if I could have it.
sonicroze 10 months ago
I'll keep my Nintendo 64
jesus160607 10 months ago
I would rather play with projector...
mveljko2 10 months ago 109