I understand that the light was emitted early on, but how can we measure/see something that is NOW traveling faster than light? How can we see anything at 1.4? Wouldn't it just disappear at that point?
@pimpo911 The gravity of the black hole is stretching space inside the event horizon faster than the light can travel through it, causing you to see nothing.
If gravity has an affect on the speed of photons than the calculations must be wrong. Perhaps the initial speed of light is instant, minus Gravity, particles other forces. To prove galaxies move faster than light we would need to calculate everything that has an affect on the photons being emitted which impossible. It’s a lot simpler to make theories based on statistics than spending your life attempting to do complex calculations. Therefore most astronomy theories will never be proven as fact.
could it be possible for space time to expand so fast initial stages of the big bang, that it could have reached this size in a matter of only a few million years, instead of suggested billions?
.. unless we find a way to create an artificial wormhole... or go to "warp" speeds... or teleportation... or realise our understanding of the universe is fundamentally wrong..
What if the universe is like an inflating balloon and we're on the 'flat' 2-dimensional skin. While inflation continues we would experience a 3 dimensional reality because only a moment ago we still where inside the balloon. Time is a chain of moments. Distant galaxys dissapear on the horizon of the 'balloon'. Now measuring the background noise would show a flat universe!
very interesting video ...can't really say I understood how it's possible for any type of matter to exceed the speed of light...but isn't that why science is so fascinating.....
Galaxy's can not travel faster than light. That's only an optical illusion. I expect super distant galaxy's to curve around a corner, from where the light can never reach us.
@gitaarman1956 They do travel faster then light and it does not violate relativity. I have a good understanding of relativity and what happens all the time is spacetime travels faster then light , but it does not violate relativity because locally it is always with in the laws of physics and light is always c.. This is one of the many reasons general relativity was derived. Spacetime can certainly travels faster then light it happens in a blackhole e.a.
@gitaarman1956 I would beg to differ. It's math, nothing more. If the galaxy is expanding at, for example, 3/4's the speed of light, then two galaxies could be traveling away from each other at 1.5 times the speed of light. It's the combined speed of the two that accounts for the speed of the increase of the distance between them.
@BloodofPatriots Nothing seems wrong with your maths, but it may be to premature to jump to conclusions. Why does triangular measurement (3x60=180 degrees) of the backgroundnoise from earlier stages of the universe show, that the universe is perfectly flat?
@gitaarman1956 Shape of the universe has nothing to do with my statement about 2 galaxies being able to move apart from one another at a combined speed faster than light. If you roll two balls across a table in opposite directions, their combined speed of moving apart will still be greater than one of their speeds by itself.
@BloodofPatriots Well, you go from several presumptions: 1)the Big Bang did happen, which is plausible but is yet to be proven. 2) the universe is 3-dimensional, which is very unlikely, since observations show otherwise. Take a good look at the research of 'Entanglement'.' It pinpoints several problems within our basic understanding of physical reality. It's not wise to jump to conclusions to fast. No doubts in my mind that combined speeds can indeed exceed the speed of light.
@gitaarman1956 The universe may not be expanding in all three dimensions equally as fast, but it is three dimensional. Look at any visible object in the universe, does it not have a height, depth, and width? Of course it does, so if objects within the universe are three dimensional then the universe itself is three dimensional.
@BloodofPatriots your statement certainly is respectable and even plausible. Eventhough, I wonder if threedimensionallity could be a psycological phenomenon in a twodimensional or rather lineair universe. Even the existance of matter itself may be a subjective experience of a consious energyfield.(that's us) A psycological construction, so to speak.This would explain many anomalities in our observations of the universe.
@gitaarman1956 because only in a flat euclidean space do the angles of a triangle add up to 180 degrees. So if the CMB radiation was passing through a curved space the angles in the triangle would not add up to 180 degrees, they would either be less, an open universe, or more, a closed universe. Type in "A universe from nothing" in the search bar and enjoy Lawrence Krauss explain all.
@st1cklebr1ck Well,look at it this way.If the big bang really did occur, it would be logical to expect the universe to expand in all direction and to be shaped like a ball.No matter from where you measure, one could never end up with a triangle of which all 3 angles add up to 180 degrees because the outlines of the ball should be curved. But these measurements show in all cases exactly 180 degrees.Could a big bang create a cube form universe? I don't think so.
Anytime I look into the facts about the cosmos, I realize that the saying "The truth is stranger than fiction" is a perfect description to the reality surrounding us. It is strange, it is beautiful and mysterious but above all exiting to discover and research. I would rather live in this mysterious universe where it might take us forever to understand most of its mechanics than an easy to figure universe. This is our last frontier and it looks more exiting every day. what else can we ask for?
@Baltahfeek If you want to have a look at our last frontier, try searching up some string theory documentations - it may completely changing the way you view the cosmos. The problem here is that string theory is yet to be proven (and is difficult to prove), just that the math behind this concept makes so much sense.
@Baltahfeek The Truth is stranger than fiction because even the sh*t we make up has a larger chance to be true. Usually, even IN fiction we still follow the common rules of the universe.
The speed of light is constant, but time and space are not. Time and space are elastic. The reason why light cannot escape a black hole isn't from gravity pulling on light itself, but from the gravity of the black hole stretching space inside the event horizon faster than the light can travel through it, like an infinite treadmill.
@Ladiciuston To make an assumption that the laws of physics are not constant between universes is a theory you could make- but that's not how you presented your comment, you presented it with the confidence that you were saying fact. It is not fact, unless you have more experience with inter dimensional travel than I do, but I think I would have heard about it.
@TheOnybear The 'stretching' or warping of spacetime is at lightspeed according to Mr. Einstein, not faster than light. Light isn't affected by gravity (it has no mass), spacetime is affected by gravity. The light is going in a straight line, gravity just redefines what 'straight' is. Then again, the Earth thinks it's going through space in a straight line too. Funny how it keeps ending up where it started :)
@Raman711 Common misconception. Light travels in a straight line through space. However that space-time can be bent so the end is at the start.
Try this. Take a piece of paper, draw a straight line on it. Gravity warps the paper into a roll so the line goes round in a circle forever. But the line still thinks it's straight.
@rnicey Oh okay, I understand now. Funny thing is just before I read your comment I watched a video that showed how the earth is revolving around the sun in a straight line but in curved space. I'm assuming that is the same principal. Thanks.
@WilliamJsime Nope, the theory of relativity still valid, there's no particle than can travel faster than speed of light within the "time and space" medium, while the "space" itself (the expanding universe) can be a lot, lot, lot faster than speed of light, especially the moment after the big bang when the "space" and universe expanded instantly in nanosecond
@rnicey No...I ment the particles and everithing which later formed planets...The particles and other small or little things traveled faster than light. Thats why we thing that it was befor 13.8 bilions of years because light from further stars and galaxies simply has not arrived to us so we dont see them....Understand?
@Rouletteguy007 You make the claim that at or near the beginning the particles (there weren't any, it was all energy, but whatever), traveled faster than light.
What evidence do you put forward to back up your claim that would revolutionize the entire current physical understanding of the universe?
@adamx20 QE does not break the laws of relativity. The entangled quanta themselves are limited by lightspeed. So an exploding universe is still bound by these laws. You're trying to be clever by implying that entanglement can move info faster than light. It can, but you can't see what that info is, so you can't violate relativity with it.
QE doesn't support FTL travel (yet), but is waiting for new revelations. I thought your paper had solved that.
@adamx20 You provided nothing. You just said 'Quantum Entanglement'. That is not evidence for FTL travel, period, unless you have something new to add to the field of quantum physics.
@rnicey You are such a fucking douche. Just as Space Time alters itself so that light remains a constant speed, it alters itself so that anything moving FTL remains moving at the speed of light relative to its space time. Go figure, the bounderies that cap lights speed allow for it to be broken in relative space time.
i thought einsten limit on speed light could not be broken that what he stated in journles and such. so nasa wrong this is coming from the same people that cant evan find life on other planets rofl and then they say gelise 581 g has disapered rofl
@jimdog1982 faster than light travel is possible..that is evident in quantum entanglement. through that information travels much faster than light could ever dream.
If aliens were real and people believe that they are possibly millions of years ahead in technology, wouldn't that mean we can actually go faster than the speed of light?
thats probable where all d aliens r and thats why we dont know dey r alive bcose dey r all leaving d universe cos there galaxies r moving faster than lite
@greekfitercod4ever It's extremely likely that neutrinos do not travel faster than the speed of light. Check out Sixty Symbols video on the subject for more detail.
@MrInsaneCranium Once the galaxie starts moving away from us faster than the speed of light, the photons(light) will no longer be travelling towards us. So from our position it will seem as if the light was turned off and the fade would occur because of the red shift, the light spectrum being stretched and reaching us over a period of time.
@poyanp wait a second. so IT IS possible for matter to travel faster than the speed of light without being affected in any sort of way like time travel and shit. so there's probably no such thing as time travel. no such thing as wormholes as well cuz wormholes are suppose to connect 2 distant points to each other. but if the wormhole is constantly moving at speeds faster than speed of light, it doesn't make sense.
@MrInsaneCranium Its a bit more complicated than that. Einstein's theory says that space and time part of the same mesh. In this case space itself is expanding and taking the galaxie with it, the galaxie itself isn't moving that fast. I suggest you google it, theres more to it then just that.
@poyanp wow! thanks for taking up some of ur precious time to reply to me. i love the feedback. yeah i guess its more complicated than that, which is why i say i having trouble understanding some concepts here. but well, i'm a banking and finance student, not a physics student. my knowledge comes from general reading. maybe if u asked me somethings about finance i would be able to answer better. LOL! astronomy just so happens to be my passion.
@bradinthejungle agreed, why are there douches on youtube arguing about something that is beyond their grasp of understanding, as if they know what the hell they're even talking about...
@llparasitell well for a starter, you should have used Know, So maybe you should learn basic English before trying to understand the origins of the universe.
@llparasitell they do, yesterday, someone commented on my 8month old reply, same thing happened a week ago. if youtube never cared, we would have comments deleted every 3 weeks
@llparasitell STOP USING CAPSLOCK its very annoying, two things, one, if it was settled already WHY ARE YOU STILL USING CAPSLOCK, I mean, you said you settled it, settling the capslock problem you have, and then commenting in CAPSLOCK does not mean its settled you fucking dumbshit, second of all, how the fuck do you not remember some shit on YouTube 3 weeks ago, if you have some kind of mental problem, then DON'T COMMENT IN LONG ARGUMENTS, so right now, there's a problem where you use capslock
@llparasitell its not what i think, its overall opinion, also, many people care about me, how does you're comment even make sense, you're still using capslock, you're faggotness has reached too much, i fucking cant get you to use you're fucking head then that's fine, hope you're problems are fixed in the future when you're mum tells you to stop using capslock
no, it expands faster than light...that is how galaxies are moving away from us at faster than light....it certainly moved much faster than light in the early seconds of the universe and still does to this day..
@63Bueno Did you even listen ? the creation of space it self is created and propeled by the big bang, it goes the same speed at light, the reason why some galaxies are rendered to disappear meaning it traveled faster than light does not mean at all that the outward expansion of space is going faster than light, it always remains at light speed.
The reason why galaxies disappear is because the space in-between you and it is expanding faster than light due to the combined relativistic propulsion.
the big bang DID expand space much faster than light in the first few seconds of the universe and it sill does....galaxies that are not close enough to be gravitationally connected are being expanded further apart by space-time at faster than light..
no shit matter cannot be propelled faster than light...Never stated it could..but space-time does..unfortunately space is not matter as i have stated over and over.....are u that unfamiliar with dark energy and how it is ever increasing the expansion of space-time??? yes, it is expanding space FASTER than the speed of light, that is why in a few billion years ALL of the galaxies will race so far away that we will no longer be able to see them....
"no, it expands faster than light...that is how galaxies are moving away from us at faster than light"
I want to make sure that you know, galaxies are never being moved faster than light or even close, you can seem to be moving faster than light when compared to another galaxy, You can in no way move faster than light.
The space in between the two galaxies combined is faster than light in some cases.
This quote is from Discovering the Universe; 7th Edition by Neil F. comins
"The expansion of the universe causes distant galaxies to recede from us faster than the speed of light, if comoving distance and cosmological time are used to calculate the speeds of these galaxies. "
Notice that it says comoving meaning the distance between two objects, the space in-between the two objects combined is expanding faster than light.
@63Bueno look at it like this, if the space in between you and me threw you left at 150 million meters per/s, and it threw me to the right at 150 million meters per/s, we would cease to see each other anymore since light travels at 279 m meters p/s, therefore it cannot travel from you to me or me to you fast enough,
This gives the illusion that we are traveling faster than light from one galaxy, when we are only traveling half the speed of light in coherence to one another.
*CONT. from last comment* a question, the teacher isn't going to say "Dumb ass, moving on..." the teacher is going to say "Well the reason that happens is/A (whatever the question was about) is a...."
llparasitell clearly knows what a hyperdimension is since he mentioned it in one of his comments. Please be a pal and share your knowledge on the subject. Giving names will get you no where.
Call me a name for my two comments and I will continue doubting your high intelligence.
Please stop fighting, not everyone here understands what the heck your talking about. Instead of saying "LOLS U R TARD" Explain your reasoning the best you can so they understand what you mean.
For example, if some asks "What is a hyperdimension?" your response isn't going to be "Just be quiet, get a name change, your a dumbass thats what happened" (Yes llparasitell ,i'm referring to your comment) answer them instead of giving something completely unrelated. If your a teacher and someone asks
NASAs complicated cosmology's built upon t theory that t universe is expanding w increasing speed, proved by t red shift of t galaxies. James McCanney & Nassim Harramien refute NASA's red shift idea; instead its due to t electrical nature of galaxies or a type of gravity wave, respectively. Both of their theories uncomplicate cosmology, now no need 4 dark matter, dark energy, Big Bang, or Rapid Inflation nor a prblem w galxies going fstr than light bcause its not a red shft so they aren't moving
I find the idea of universal expansion to the point where galaxies move away from us faster than light a bit depressing. If the universe continues to accelerate in expansion eventually all galaxies other than the local cluster will be lost to us. The sky will be pretty bleak :/
If live arose a hundred billion years from now, they might never know there was a grand universe billions of light years across.
@llparasitell I said "hundred billion years." Maybe you should spend more time reading and less time loling. Do you really think that I mistakenly believe that I'll be alive in a hundred billion years?
Do you get the picture, or are you the type of person who assumes the world exists only to amuse you personally and don't give a fuck about what happens after you're dead?
@aluisious Of the points of light you see in the sky at night with the naked eye, the VAST (read: VAAAAST) majority is from our own galaxy, the rest (the most visible blurs) is from our local group, and pretty near by cosmological terms. A few blurs may be nebuli, and distant galaxies, but they are faint (to the naked eye...), So if the entire universe but our local group disappeared in 5 minutes, nobody except the trained would notice the difference :)
NASA has created a complicated cosmology built upon the theory that the universe is expanding w increasing speed, proved by the red shift of galaxies. Both James McCanney & Nassim Harramien refute NASA's red shift interpretation; instead its due to the electrical nature of galaxies or a type of gravity wave, respectively. Both of their theories vastly uncomplicate cosmology, as it no longer needs dark matter, dark energy, Big Bang, or Rapid Inflation for it to make sense!
As that galaxy approaches z=1.4, the photons would be going slower than C towards us, since light can not travel faster than C. In that event, a minute's worth of emission from that galaxy would eventually reach us, and irradiate us over the course of longer and longer times.
That galaxy would appear to become more and more red and dim; and if we could see somebody's watch in that retreating galaxy, it would tick the hours away more slowly.
@mQtek So, you're telling me light can travel faster than "the speed of light" ?? What, in the Casimir vacuum? Using SBS?? How is that relative to this discussion or my comment about light traveling through the vacuum of space?
@dreamburn1 How is it relative? What are you, a fucking retard? If you do not know something, google. The speed of light changes depending on where it is, in a vacuum in this sector, this tiny sector we can see the speed of light is a specific speed, however further out it's greater, it's been proven, I do not know why some people so 'educated' in the matter don't know about news like this.
@TeHTwist97 The universe was infinite from the moment of its beginning.There is no such thing as an edge.You can't just go out into hyperspace like that.
The universe is slightly bent meaning that if you go in one direction eventually you would get back to your starting point.Of course the universe would end long before the time you get back but you get the point.
If we wan't to pass in to higher dimension we'll have to completely redesign our dna in order to comprehend the higher dimensions.Currently our brain can't even imagine a 4th directional dimension.Hyperspace has 10 directions as I understand it.
Passing in to other dimensions if at all possible will not be done for tens of thousands of years by that time humanity will evolve into something completely different if they live that long
@OmegaAlphaPsi Entering a nother dimension isn't simple at all.It requires a much higher level of understanding then our current and huge amounts of energy as well if it's actually possible that is.
Going beyond our dimension is like entering a higher plain of existance.Without full comprehension of that dimension there isn't much sense in entering it anyway.To give you sci-fi example it would be something like the ascension of the ancient in stargate.
This has been flagged as spam show
Nothing travel faster then light, it is space that is bending. Or you can prove otherwise and win nobel prize.
Vanhyo 23 hours ago
Comment removed
Vanhyo 1 day ago
could it be that the whole universe is rotating around something??
lauraelprostitude 3 days ago
I understand that the light was emitted early on, but how can we measure/see something that is NOW traveling faster than light? How can we see anything at 1.4? Wouldn't it just disappear at that point?
ThElitE 4 days ago
mathematica - aha!
sumittechkgp 5 days ago
If light has no mass then why it gets trapped in a black hole?
pimpo911 1 week ago
@pimpo911 The gravity of the black hole is stretching space inside the event horizon faster than the light can travel through it, causing you to see nothing.
daberko120ch 3 days ago
If gravity has an affect on the speed of photons than the calculations must be wrong. Perhaps the initial speed of light is instant, minus Gravity, particles other forces. To prove galaxies move faster than light we would need to calculate everything that has an affect on the photons being emitted which impossible. It’s a lot simpler to make theories based on statistics than spending your life attempting to do complex calculations. Therefore most astronomy theories will never be proven as fact.
Turtleo0 1 week ago
theoretically wouldnt the limit be 2x the speed of light... both traveling that speed away from a common relative point..
ruttyj92 1 week ago
Warp 8!! ENGAGE!!
illegalmonkey 1 week ago
could it be possible for space time to expand so fast initial stages of the big bang, that it could have reached this size in a matter of only a few million years, instead of suggested billions?
Please answer me this
Duplooytim 1 week ago
.. unless we find a way to create an artificial wormhole... or go to "warp" speeds... or teleportation... or realise our understanding of the universe is fundamentally wrong..
xhable 1 week ago
What if the universe is like an inflating balloon and we're on the 'flat' 2-dimensional skin. While inflation continues we would experience a 3 dimensional reality because only a moment ago we still where inside the balloon. Time is a chain of moments. Distant galaxys dissapear on the horizon of the 'balloon'. Now measuring the background noise would show a flat universe!
And guess what? It does!
gitaarman1956 1 week ago
This scared the crap out of me.. :o
jap695 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
very interesting video ...can't really say I understood how it's possible for any type of matter to exceed the speed of light...but isn't that why science is so fascinating.....
garyvale440 1 week ago
Comment removed
garyvale440 1 week ago
Galaxy's can not travel faster than light. That's only an optical illusion. I expect super distant galaxy's to curve around a corner, from where the light can never reach us.
gitaarman1956 1 week ago
@gitaarman1956 They do travel faster then light and it does not violate relativity. I have a good understanding of relativity and what happens all the time is spacetime travels faster then light , but it does not violate relativity because locally it is always with in the laws of physics and light is always c.. This is one of the many reasons general relativity was derived. Spacetime can certainly travels faster then light it happens in a blackhole e.a.
alexlancer11 1 week ago
@gitaarman1956 I would beg to differ. It's math, nothing more. If the galaxy is expanding at, for example, 3/4's the speed of light, then two galaxies could be traveling away from each other at 1.5 times the speed of light. It's the combined speed of the two that accounts for the speed of the increase of the distance between them.
BloodofPatriots 1 week ago
@BloodofPatriots Nothing seems wrong with your maths, but it may be to premature to jump to conclusions. Why does triangular measurement (3x60=180 degrees) of the backgroundnoise from earlier stages of the universe show, that the universe is perfectly flat?
gitaarman1956 1 week ago
@gitaarman1956 Shape of the universe has nothing to do with my statement about 2 galaxies being able to move apart from one another at a combined speed faster than light. If you roll two balls across a table in opposite directions, their combined speed of moving apart will still be greater than one of their speeds by itself.
BloodofPatriots 1 week ago
@BloodofPatriots Well, you go from several presumptions: 1)the Big Bang did happen, which is plausible but is yet to be proven. 2) the universe is 3-dimensional, which is very unlikely, since observations show otherwise. Take a good look at the research of 'Entanglement'.' It pinpoints several problems within our basic understanding of physical reality. It's not wise to jump to conclusions to fast. No doubts in my mind that combined speeds can indeed exceed the speed of light.
gitaarman1956 1 week ago
@gitaarman1956 The universe may not be expanding in all three dimensions equally as fast, but it is three dimensional. Look at any visible object in the universe, does it not have a height, depth, and width? Of course it does, so if objects within the universe are three dimensional then the universe itself is three dimensional.
BloodofPatriots 1 week ago
@BloodofPatriots your statement certainly is respectable and even plausible. Eventhough, I wonder if threedimensionallity could be a psycological phenomenon in a twodimensional or rather lineair universe. Even the existance of matter itself may be a subjective experience of a consious energyfield.(that's us) A psycological construction, so to speak.This would explain many anomalities in our observations of the universe.
gitaarman1956 1 week ago
@gitaarman1956 because only in a flat euclidean space do the angles of a triangle add up to 180 degrees. So if the CMB radiation was passing through a curved space the angles in the triangle would not add up to 180 degrees, they would either be less, an open universe, or more, a closed universe. Type in "A universe from nothing" in the search bar and enjoy Lawrence Krauss explain all.
st1cklebr1ck 1 week ago
@st1cklebr1ck Well,look at it this way.If the big bang really did occur, it would be logical to expect the universe to expand in all direction and to be shaped like a ball.No matter from where you measure, one could never end up with a triangle of which all 3 angles add up to 180 degrees because the outlines of the ball should be curved. But these measurements show in all cases exactly 180 degrees.Could a big bang create a cube form universe? I don't think so.
gitaarman1956 1 week ago
tony .. you should be in the AMNH with neil .. both of you make science so lovable ..
OzSpud72 2 weeks ago
These kids need to get back to their homework. They're giving me a headache.
MRRY0703 2 weeks ago
Meaning... Given enough time, every other galaxy will leave our visible horizon? Future archeo-astronomers will have a much smaller universe.
drche420 2 weeks ago
you know you're an articulate reader when transcribe audio get's everything that's said correct.
brett123ist 2 weeks ago
damn this fucker is speaking like in another language !!!! what was he trying to say ??? english please !!!!
chocolate9076 2 weeks ago
Anytime I look into the facts about the cosmos, I realize that the saying "The truth is stranger than fiction" is a perfect description to the reality surrounding us. It is strange, it is beautiful and mysterious but above all exiting to discover and research. I would rather live in this mysterious universe where it might take us forever to understand most of its mechanics than an easy to figure universe. This is our last frontier and it looks more exiting every day. what else can we ask for?
Baltahfeek 2 weeks ago 31
@Baltahfeek If you want to have a look at our last frontier, try searching up some string theory documentations - it may completely changing the way you view the cosmos. The problem here is that string theory is yet to be proven (and is difficult to prove), just that the math behind this concept makes so much sense.
KillFrenzy96 2 weeks ago
Comment removed
MegaJoseflor 2 weeks ago
@Baltahfeek But, what if every galaxy had a penis? Then in that case fiction would be stranger than the truth.
OutoftheblueNinja 1 week ago
@Baltahfeek The Truth is stranger than fiction because even the sh*t we make up has a larger chance to be true. Usually, even IN fiction we still follow the common rules of the universe.
BaxterXenon 3 days ago
@Baltahfeek Cheers.
ANGELOFCREPUSCULENCE 2 days ago
I'm a retard but it seems like when you look into space, you're looking back into time. Well time in human reference. Mind fuck.
TheJovanist 2 weeks ago
The speed of light is constant, but time and space are not. Time and space are elastic. The reason why light cannot escape a black hole isn't from gravity pulling on light itself, but from the gravity of the black hole stretching space inside the event horizon faster than the light can travel through it, like an infinite treadmill.
TheOnybear 3 weeks ago
@TheOnybear the speed of light is different in parallel universes
Ladiciuston 3 weeks ago
@Ladiciuston To make an assumption that the laws of physics are not constant between universes is a theory you could make- but that's not how you presented your comment, you presented it with the confidence that you were saying fact. It is not fact, unless you have more experience with inter dimensional travel than I do, but I think I would have heard about it.
Polydynamix 2 weeks ago
@TheOnybear The 'stretching' or warping of spacetime is at lightspeed according to Mr. Einstein, not faster than light. Light isn't affected by gravity (it has no mass), spacetime is affected by gravity. The light is going in a straight line, gravity just redefines what 'straight' is. Then again, the Earth thinks it's going through space in a straight line too. Funny how it keeps ending up where it started :)
rnicey 3 weeks ago
@rnicey If light isn't affected by gravity then how do you explain a black hole?
Raman711 2 weeks ago
@Raman711 Common misconception. Light travels in a straight line through space. However that space-time can be bent so the end is at the start.
Try this. Take a piece of paper, draw a straight line on it. Gravity warps the paper into a roll so the line goes round in a circle forever. But the line still thinks it's straight.
rnicey 2 weeks ago
@rnicey Oh okay, I understand now. Funny thing is just before I read your comment I watched a video that showed how the earth is revolving around the sun in a straight line but in curved space. I'm assuming that is the same principal. Thanks.
Raman711 2 weeks ago
Don't call the universe creation. You're giving the ,lunatics ammunition.
WaiteDavidMSPhysics 3 weeks ago
Comment removed
WilliamJsime 3 weeks ago
@WilliamJsime Nope, the theory of relativity still valid, there's no particle than can travel faster than speed of light within the "time and space" medium, while the "space" itself (the expanding universe) can be a lot, lot, lot faster than speed of light, especially the moment after the big bang when the "space" and universe expanded instantly in nanosecond
MrSensevessel 3 weeks ago
@WilliamJsime You mean when your straw man version of relativity was proved wrong.
WaiteDavidMSPhysics 3 weeks ago
@WilliamJsime, nope, bad wiring! XD
ndyt 3 weeks ago
Planets right after big bang traveled much faster than light....Im sure of that
Rouletteguy007 3 weeks ago
@Rouletteguy007 What planets existed right after the big bang?
WaiteDavidMSPhysics 3 weeks ago
@WaiteDavidMSPhysics I ment rather material which went faster...
Rouletteguy007 3 weeks ago
@Rouletteguy007 What material? You mean virtual particles? light? It took time for matter to coalesce.
WaiteDavidMSPhysics 3 weeks ago
@Rouletteguy007 What planets? They took quite literally ages to form.
rnicey 2 weeks ago
@rnicey No...I ment the particles and everithing which later formed planets...The particles and other small or little things traveled faster than light. Thats why we thing that it was befor 13.8 bilions of years because light from further stars and galaxies simply has not arrived to us so we dont see them....Understand?
Rouletteguy007 2 weeks ago
@Rouletteguy007 No. Not a word.
rnicey 2 weeks ago
@rnicey Why not? What was before it?
Rouletteguy007 2 weeks ago
@Rouletteguy007 You make the claim that at or near the beginning the particles (there weren't any, it was all energy, but whatever), traveled faster than light.
What evidence do you put forward to back up your claim that would revolutionize the entire current physical understanding of the universe?
rnicey 2 weeks ago
@rnicey Quantam entanglement
adamx20 2 weeks ago
@adamx20 I await your paper on the QE of galaxies, and it's relation to the big bang with great interest.
rnicey 2 weeks ago
@rnicey That is not what you asked for.
adamx20 2 weeks ago
@adamx20 QE does not break the laws of relativity. The entangled quanta themselves are limited by lightspeed. So an exploding universe is still bound by these laws. You're trying to be clever by implying that entanglement can move info faster than light. It can, but you can't see what that info is, so you can't violate relativity with it.
QE doesn't support FTL travel (yet), but is waiting for new revelations. I thought your paper had solved that.
rnicey 2 weeks ago
@rnicey No I am not trying to be clever. You wanted evidence, and I provided a physical real for FTL travel.
The fact that you are reading into what I wrote explains a lot about you.
adamx20 2 weeks ago
@adamx20 You provided nothing. You just said 'Quantum Entanglement'. That is not evidence for FTL travel, period, unless you have something new to add to the field of quantum physics.
rnicey 2 weeks ago
@rnicey Are you still on about this? You just stated quantum entanglement provides FTL travel. You wanna take a break and rethink your approach?
adamx20 2 weeks ago
@adamx20 Nice try.
rnicey 2 weeks ago
@rnicey What the hell do you want? You want me to explain the universe to you in 500 characters? You wanted evidence. You got some. Fucking Troll.
adamx20 2 weeks ago
@adamx20 Evidence. Two words. Heh heh.
rnicey 2 weeks ago
@rnicey You like that? Good. Here's two more you can shove up your ass. Time Space.
adamx20 2 weeks ago
@adamx20 Keep going and you'll have your physics paper by the next ice age.
rnicey 2 weeks ago
@rnicey You are such a fucking douche. Just as Space Time alters itself so that light remains a constant speed, it alters itself so that anything moving FTL remains moving at the speed of light relative to its space time. Go figure, the bounderies that cap lights speed allow for it to be broken in relative space time.
adamx20 2 weeks ago
@adamx20 You're rude and have no idea what you're talking about. Say hello to my block list, I won't see your reply.
rnicey 2 weeks ago
@rnicey Thank you for the favor.
adamx20 2 weeks ago
that was kewl!
rahimnfl 3 weeks ago
i thought einsten limit on speed light could not be broken that what he stated in journles and such. so nasa wrong this is coming from the same people that cant evan find life on other planets rofl and then they say gelise 581 g has disapered rofl
jimdog1982 3 weeks ago
@jimdog1982 faster than light travel is possible..that is evident in quantum entanglement. through that information travels much faster than light could ever dream.
Kinyo84 3 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
If aliens were real and people believe that they are possibly millions of years ahead in technology, wouldn't that mean we can actually go faster than the speed of light?
Imposonator3212 3 weeks ago
Bottom comment 9. Upper comment 11. ...What the hell? ._.
OmniPsych 3 weeks ago
Comment removed
5433dan3345 3 weeks ago
I can hardly understand anything about it
aandrusiak 3 weeks ago
The universe is electric people... wake the fuck up! The Standard model is done, done and done! Peace
MrStoneClark 3 weeks ago
Nice video but the music is annoying, thanks regardless
mufc4everch 3 weeks ago
@mufc4everch UNI TED UNITED R THE TEAM 4 ME WITH A NICK NACK PADDY WACK GIVE A DOG A BONEEEEE WHY DON'T CITY FUCK OFF HOME!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
calzagheisthebest 3 weeks ago
Without the Higgs that could be all wrong or misunderstood, I love science for that reason, we never truly know.
Bogg50 3 weeks ago
thats probable where all d aliens r and thats why we dont know dey r alive bcose dey r all leaving d universe cos there galaxies r moving faster than lite
JBroMCMXCI 3 weeks ago
Objects moving cannot effect the speed of a light photon.
throwingshit 3 weeks ago
@throwingshit Thats correct, but if the object in motion is moving faster than the photon then well..its self explanatory..
5433dan3345 3 weeks ago
@greekfitercod4ever It's extremely likely that neutrinos do not travel faster than the speed of light. Check out Sixty Symbols video on the subject for more detail.
zcmini000 3 weeks ago
@zcmini000 thats why i said iff and not if
greekfitercod4ever 3 weeks ago
mind exploded
A801506 4 weeks ago
reference from wiki? poor move creator
Rahavin1 1 month ago
HOLY SHIT MINDFUCK THE LAST 2 MINUTES
TheTramsen 1 month ago
ok.. this is kinda complex for me. i have trouble understanding the last part where the galaxy freezes..
MrInsaneCranium 1 month ago
@MrInsaneCranium Once the galaxie starts moving away from us faster than the speed of light, the photons(light) will no longer be travelling towards us. So from our position it will seem as if the light was turned off and the fade would occur because of the red shift, the light spectrum being stretched and reaching us over a period of time.
poyanp 1 month ago
@poyanp wait a second. so IT IS possible for matter to travel faster than the speed of light without being affected in any sort of way like time travel and shit. so there's probably no such thing as time travel. no such thing as wormholes as well cuz wormholes are suppose to connect 2 distant points to each other. but if the wormhole is constantly moving at speeds faster than speed of light, it doesn't make sense.
MrInsaneCranium 4 weeks ago
@MrInsaneCranium Its a bit more complicated than that. Einstein's theory says that space and time part of the same mesh. In this case space itself is expanding and taking the galaxie with it, the galaxie itself isn't moving that fast. I suggest you google it, theres more to it then just that.
poyanp 4 weeks ago
@poyanp wow! thanks for taking up some of ur precious time to reply to me. i love the feedback. yeah i guess its more complicated than that, which is why i say i having trouble understanding some concepts here. but well, i'm a banking and finance student, not a physics student. my knowledge comes from general reading. maybe if u asked me somethings about finance i would be able to answer better. LOL! astronomy just so happens to be my passion.
MrInsaneCranium 4 weeks ago
Wow... idiots barking nonsense at each other in the presence of an amazingly educative video posted free on the internet. We're all doomed.
bradinthejungle 1 month ago 43
@bradinthejungle What did I do wrong :S
I'm just trying to calm the dude down, lol.
SirNoddy1 1 month ago
@SirNoddy1
Nothing, I wasn't referring to you.
bradinthejungle 1 month ago
@bradinthejungle agreed, why are there douches on youtube arguing about something that is beyond their grasp of understanding, as if they know what the hell they're even talking about...
brett123ist 2 weeks ago
I like how all these comments are people who have actually no idea about what they're talking about, trying to educate people...
Just because you've seen some space videos doesn't mean you understand space itself and have the right to educate and correct people.
Example: All the comments below me.
SirNoddy1 1 month ago
Comment removed
llparasitell 1 month ago
@SirNoddy1 who are the people that no nothing about what they are talking about, educate us please.
llparasitell 1 month ago
@llparasitell well for a starter, you should have used Know, So maybe you should learn basic English before trying to understand the origins of the universe.
SirNoddy1 1 month ago
@SirNoddy1 HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHA A FAGGET TRYING TO SPELL CHECK SOMEONE ELSE ON THE INTERNET WHAT A PHUCKIN NERD
"virginity is strong with this one"
llparasitell 1 month ago
@llparasitell Shit. What's wrong with you dude?
But thanks for proving my point.
SirNoddy1 1 month ago
@SirNoddy1 hahahahahahahah GTFO NIGGER SHIT, WHAT TEH PHUCK IS WRONG WITH UUUU, HAHAHAHAHAHA I LMAO'D SO PHUCKIN HARD,\
YOU KNOE SHIT ABOUT THE UNIVERSE GO BACK TO PHUCKIN SPELL CHECKIN HAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHA
llparasitell 1 month ago
@llparasitell Er, dude, all I was saying is physics is A LOT more difficult than English, but it's cool. You're clearly retarded.
SirNoddy1 1 month ago 31
@SirNoddy1 THIS IS YOU
"OMG U GUYS NOE NUTHIN OF THE UNIVERSE, OK THATS ALL I HAVE TO SAY CAUSE I DONT NO SHIT EITHER AND I JUST WANTED TO TELLUOK BYEEEE"
IF U THINK U KNOW SOMETHING THAT WE DONT , THEN FUCKIN MAN UP AND SPEAK QUIT BEIN A FUCKIN RETARDED ASS SHIT WITH NOTHING TO SAY.
llparasitell 1 month ago
@llparasitell capslock = nobody likes you (yes, i just used this twice)
XAnImEzLoVeRX 1 week ago
@XAnImEzLoVeRX NOBODY CARES ABOUT UR OPINION QUIT ANSWERING TO CONVERSATIONS THAT WERE 3 FUCKIN WEEKS AGO.
NOBODY REMEMBERS NOBODY CARES, HAVE A GOOD DAY SIR
llparasitell 1 week ago
@llparasitell they do, yesterday, someone commented on my 8month old reply, same thing happened a week ago. if youtube never cared, we would have comments deleted every 3 weeks
XAnImEzLoVeRX 1 week ago
@XAnImEzLoVeRX NOBODY CARES, I DONT EVEN REMEMBER WHAT I SAID 3 WEEKS AGO,
WHEN I REPLY TO COMMENTS OVER A FEW WEEKS NOBODY REPLIES BACK.
BECAUSE MOST DISPUTES WERE ALREADY SETTLED.
THAT CONVERSATION WAS OVER LONG AGO.
llparasitell 1 week ago
@llparasitell STOP USING CAPSLOCK its very annoying, two things, one, if it was settled already WHY ARE YOU STILL USING CAPSLOCK, I mean, you said you settled it, settling the capslock problem you have, and then commenting in CAPSLOCK does not mean its settled you fucking dumbshit, second of all, how the fuck do you not remember some shit on YouTube 3 weeks ago, if you have some kind of mental problem, then DON'T COMMENT IN LONG ARGUMENTS, so right now, there's a problem where you use capslock
XAnImEzLoVeRX 1 week ago
@XAnImEzLoVeRX STFU STOP TALKING TO ME, NOBODY CARES ABOUT WHAT U THINK, NOBODY CARES ABOUT U,
TALK TO SOMEONE ELSE PLEASE LONER.
llparasitell 1 week ago
@llparasitell its not what i think, its overall opinion, also, many people care about me, how does you're comment even make sense, you're still using capslock, you're faggotness has reached too much, i fucking cant get you to use you're fucking head then that's fine, hope you're problems are fixed in the future when you're mum tells you to stop using capslock
XAnImEzLoVeRX 1 week ago
@XAnImEzLoVeRX NOBODY CARES ABOUT YOU REMEMBER THAT, BECAUSE ITS TRUE.
STOP TALKING TO ME LONER
llparasitell 1 week ago
@llparasitell oh ok then, what ever you believe
XAnImEzLoVeRX 1 week ago
@SirNoddy1 That's why he is in English
geminijumper 3 weeks ago
@SirNoddy1 lol that's the funniest shit I've heard in a while. Good one.
xxxDave24xxx 2 weeks ago 5
@llparasitell Wait a second, YOU'RE 31?!?!??!? Really, get a job, move out of your parents and start acting like an adult loser.
wallpaperkilla 4 weeks ago
@wallpaperkilla HAHAHAHAH FUCKING SHIT ASS WALLPAPER FUCK FAGGET HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
IM FUCKIN 10 YEARS OLD AND I MAKE MARE THAN UR FUCKING SHITTY ASS LIFE HAHAHAHAHAHAHA
FUCKING SHIT FAGGET !
llparasitell 4 weeks ago
@llparasitell capslock = nobody likes you
XAnImEzLoVeRX 1 week ago
@llparasitell lame lame lame. Get a fucking life kid.
wallpaperkilla 4 weeks ago
@SirNoddy1 its sad how you're in the same position as the people who have been described by you
XAnImEzLoVeRX 1 week ago
You had me until... "relativity places no limits on the speed with which creation can expand" :(
jiberish001 1 month ago
Comment removed
63Bueno 1 month ago
@jiberish001
He said "space time...not creation...space-time can and does sxpand faster than light
63Bueno 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@63Bueno Nope. At 3:50 -- "relativity places no limits on the speed with which creation can expand"
My sad face was not due to a lack of understanding.
jiberish001 1 month ago
@63Bueno no. the area in between galaxies is expanding not faster than light tho, it expands at the same speed as light,
llparasitell 1 month ago
@llparasitell
no, it expands faster than light...that is how galaxies are moving away from us at faster than light....it certainly moved much faster than light in the early seconds of the universe and still does to this day..
63Bueno 1 month ago
@63Bueno Did you even listen ? the creation of space it self is created and propeled by the big bang, it goes the same speed at light, the reason why some galaxies are rendered to disappear meaning it traveled faster than light does not mean at all that the outward expansion of space is going faster than light, it always remains at light speed.
The reason why galaxies disappear is because the space in-between you and it is expanding faster than light due to the combined relativistic propulsion.
llparasitell 1 month ago
@llparasitell
the big bang DID expand space much faster than light in the first few seconds of the universe and it sill does....galaxies that are not close enough to be gravitationally connected are being expanded further apart by space-time at faster than light..
63Bueno 1 month ago
@63Bueno firstly, nobody has any evidence how fast the explosion propelled space when the big bang was created you can only guess, assume, and reason.
This statement from you tells me that you are talking from your ass.
"galaxies that are not close enough to be gravitationally connected"
Are you like half retarded ? no offence but this is child's gibberish.
Seccondly, matter cannot be propelled in anyway shape or form faster than light.
why? because E=mc2
llparasitell 1 month ago
@llparasitell
no shit matter cannot be propelled faster than light...Never stated it could..but space-time does..unfortunately space is not matter as i have stated over and over.....are u that unfamiliar with dark energy and how it is ever increasing the expansion of space-time??? yes, it is expanding space FASTER than the speed of light, that is why in a few billion years ALL of the galaxies will race so far away that we will no longer be able to see them....
63Bueno 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@63Bueno this is what youre statement
"no, it expands faster than light...that is how galaxies are moving away from us at faster than light"
I want to make sure that you know, galaxies are never being moved faster than light or even close, you can seem to be moving faster than light when compared to another galaxy, You can in no way move faster than light.
The space in between the two galaxies combined is faster than light in some cases.
llparasitell 1 month ago
@63Bueno Im sorry to say but you are wrong.
This quote is from Discovering the Universe; 7th Edition by Neil F. comins
"The expansion of the universe causes distant galaxies to recede from us faster than the speed of light, if comoving distance and cosmological time are used to calculate the speeds of these galaxies. "
Notice that it says comoving meaning the distance between two objects, the space in-between the two objects combined is expanding faster than light.
Carbosful 1 month ago
@63Bueno look at it like this, if the space in between you and me threw you left at 150 million meters per/s, and it threw me to the right at 150 million meters per/s, we would cease to see each other anymore since light travels at 279 m meters p/s, therefore it cannot travel from you to me or me to you fast enough,
This gives the illusion that we are traveling faster than light from one galaxy, when we are only traveling half the speed of light in coherence to one another.
^^
Carbosful 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
*CONT. from last comment* a question, the teacher isn't going to say "Dumb ass, moving on..." the teacher is going to say "Well the reason that happens is/A (whatever the question was about) is a...."
llparasitell clearly knows what a hyperdimension is since he mentioned it in one of his comments. Please be a pal and share your knowledge on the subject. Giving names will get you no where.
Call me a name for my two comments and I will continue doubting your high intelligence.
MarioMarioBW 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Please stop fighting, not everyone here understands what the heck your talking about. Instead of saying "LOLS U R TARD" Explain your reasoning the best you can so they understand what you mean.
For example, if some asks "What is a hyperdimension?" your response isn't going to be "Just be quiet, get a name change, your a dumbass thats what happened" (Yes llparasitell ,i'm referring to your comment) answer them instead of giving something completely unrelated. If your a teacher and someone asks
MarioMarioBW 1 month ago
fuck all of you
Jesuscopterapocalyps 1 month ago
NASAs complicated cosmology's built upon t theory that t universe is expanding w increasing speed, proved by t red shift of t galaxies. James McCanney & Nassim Harramien refute NASA's red shift idea; instead its due to t electrical nature of galaxies or a type of gravity wave, respectively. Both of their theories uncomplicate cosmology, now no need 4 dark matter, dark energy, Big Bang, or Rapid Inflation nor a prblem w galxies going fstr than light bcause its not a red shft so they aren't moving
Zguy000 1 month ago
I find the idea of universal expansion to the point where galaxies move away from us faster than light a bit depressing. If the universe continues to accelerate in expansion eventually all galaxies other than the local cluster will be lost to us. The sky will be pretty bleak :/
If live arose a hundred billion years from now, they might never know there was a grand universe billions of light years across.
aluisious 1 month ago
@aluisious lol are u joking ? cause for the sky to be completely bleak it will take multiple multiple BILLIONS of years.
Your life time is 80 years.. Do you get the picture now?
llparasitell 1 month ago
@llparasitell I said "hundred billion years." Maybe you should spend more time reading and less time loling. Do you really think that I mistakenly believe that I'll be alive in a hundred billion years?
Do you get the picture, or are you the type of person who assumes the world exists only to amuse you personally and don't give a fuck about what happens after you're dead?
aluisious 1 month ago
@aluisious Of the points of light you see in the sky at night with the naked eye, the VAST (read: VAAAAST) majority is from our own galaxy, the rest (the most visible blurs) is from our local group, and pretty near by cosmological terms. A few blurs may be nebuli, and distant galaxies, but they are faint (to the naked eye...), So if the entire universe but our local group disappeared in 5 minutes, nobody except the trained would notice the difference :)
HKragh 1 month ago
astronomy is so cool
infectedsubincision 1 month ago
NASA has created a complicated cosmology built upon the theory that the universe is expanding w increasing speed, proved by the red shift of galaxies. Both James McCanney & Nassim Harramien refute NASA's red shift interpretation; instead its due to the electrical nature of galaxies or a type of gravity wave, respectively. Both of their theories vastly uncomplicate cosmology, as it no longer needs dark matter, dark energy, Big Bang, or Rapid Inflation for it to make sense!
Zguy000 1 month ago
@Zguy000 Cosmology has little to do with NASA. Kind of a tip off that you don't know what you're talking about.
aluisious 1 month ago
galaxies cant travel faster than the speed of light idiot
iiottoii 1 month ago
@iiottoii galaxies arent travelling faster than light, the space inbetween is increasing...
sinmantky 1 month ago
@iiottoii That's exactly what he was trying to get across. Read the info before you make ignorant, meaningless comments.
TheGinetik 1 month ago
"Creation" ???
YoLninYo 1 month ago
Reduce the graphics and the entire presentation will stream better. The information is amazing.
thcricketi8 1 month ago
So in time, as more and more galaxies pick up speed we will not see any stars or other glaxies outside our own Milky Way.
Perhaps not even guessing how the universe looked.
scary :O
cr4yv3n 1 month ago
Retreating galaxy image freezing and fading away:
As that galaxy approaches z=1.4, the photons would be going slower than C towards us, since light can not travel faster than C. In that event, a minute's worth of emission from that galaxy would eventually reach us, and irradiate us over the course of longer and longer times.
That galaxy would appear to become more and more red and dim; and if we could see somebody's watch in that retreating galaxy, it would tick the hours away more slowly.
dreamburn1 1 month ago
@dreamburn1 light can travel faster than C. :)
mQtek 1 month ago 2
@mQtek So, you're telling me light can travel faster than "the speed of light" ?? What, in the Casimir vacuum? Using SBS?? How is that relative to this discussion or my comment about light traveling through the vacuum of space?
dreamburn1 4 weeks ago
@dreamburn1 How is it relative? What are you, a fucking retard? If you do not know something, google. The speed of light changes depending on where it is, in a vacuum in this sector, this tiny sector we can see the speed of light is a specific speed, however further out it's greater, it's been proven, I do not know why some people so 'educated' in the matter don't know about news like this.
mQtek 4 weeks ago
Will we ever reach the edge of space where the is nothing or will it just continue for ever and ever
TeHTwist97 1 month ago
@TeHTwist97 The universe was infinite from the moment of its beginning.There is no such thing as an edge.You can't just go out into hyperspace like that.
The universe is slightly bent meaning that if you go in one direction eventually you would get back to your starting point.Of course the universe would end long before the time you get back but you get the point.
TheBlackIdentety 1 month ago
@TheBlackIdentety You're right, to get to hyperspace we'd have to go to a higher dimension.
OmegaAlphaPsi 1 month ago
@OmegaAlphaPsi Hyperspace is the 11th dimension.
If we wan't to pass in to higher dimension we'll have to completely redesign our dna in order to comprehend the higher dimensions.Currently our brain can't even imagine a 4th directional dimension.Hyperspace has 10 directions as I understand it.
Passing in to other dimensions if at all possible will not be done for tens of thousands of years by that time humanity will evolve into something completely different if they live that long
TheBlackIdentety 1 month ago
@TheBlackIdentety Not entirely, can't we just invent a matrix for that along with a dimensional harmonizer?
That seems a little too over the top, for something so "simple".
OmegaAlphaPsi 1 month ago
@OmegaAlphaPsi Entering a nother dimension isn't simple at all.It requires a much higher level of understanding then our current and huge amounts of energy as well if it's actually possible that is.
Going beyond our dimension is like entering a higher plain of existance.Without full comprehension of that dimension there isn't much sense in entering it anyway.To give you sci-fi example it would be something like the ascension of the ancient in stargate.
TheBlackIdentety 1 month ago