"@wowleo1 I'm sorry you don't agree with what Pure Vision designed. However, it most definitely is a 70 Charger with 68 taillights. It was designed as a whole car with a European feel.
llilsass 1 year ago"
Not gonna @ you, because it's a year old... But, it's AMERICAN MUSCLE. Why the fuck do you want to make it 'European'? Just by taking a 68's tail lights and sticking them on a 70 doesn't make the damn thing European.
@clockwork624 Ahahahah Look whos talking.. I never ever have seen a 68 with a wraparound bumper, and it doesn't have round marker lights. So keep your mouth shut.
@The68chargerlover aww ur mad cus ur a dumb fuck too that shits modified the body is a 68's and the tail lights so yea have fun with ur dumb shit self
It is a '70 with a '68 tail. Why, I don't know. It has the wrap-around bumper up front even though it's painted and not chromed and the doors are '70 doors. The other telling marks are the side marker/blinker lights but it looks like they removed them because I don't see '68 style, '70 style or any side marker lights on it for that matter.
@wowleo1 I'm sorry you don't agree with what Pure Vision designed. However, it most definitely is a 70 Charger with 68 taillights. It was designed as a whole car with a European feel.
@Mr70ChallengerRT No it is NOT a 68, but rather, a 70 with 68 taillights. I've been around this car for almost 3 years and have heard the stories about all the little things done to it. The creators at Pure Vision decided that for this concept, the 68 taillights would look better than the original 70.
@llilsass Not sure where that is, not from the USA, the mountains in the background I mean, gorgeous backdrop, hesitate to say this for geographical ignorance alert.. :) but are they the "Rockies" ?
This charger turns like a dream. Only a car with superior handling can turn like this. All those stock muscle cars can make doughnuts but none of them can look like this. Cheers
I'm sorry, but after being around the car in person as well as knowing and speaking with Steve Strope and the crew at Pure Vision Designs, this is a '70 with '68 tail lights. I got the story straight from the source.
Yess, im sure. .. is a 70 with 68 taillaits!!.. . but why is a 70 charger?.. .R= thats is because in the front of the car it brings a part chrome, 68 and 69 dont bring, in the video it painted orange.
yes the front bumper is painted orange. It is part of the design the Pure Vision came up with. The thought that a huge chrome bumper would not flow with the design style they were looking for.
That is quite the hill-billy buggy. Do you have card board cut-outs of Bo and Luke in the back seats. Add a dixie horn and some orange paint you you are almost there. Well one year too new.
No, I'm sorry, you are mistaken. It was originally a 1970 Charger. Pure Vision Designs and Steve Strope customized this car. I have ridden in it a few times and heard the stories. It is a 70 Charger with 68 tail lights.
If you read further in these comments,in particular by ph3s1968, you will read that this is NOT a 68 charger, but rather a 70 charger with 68 tail lights.
This was the design by Pure Vision. If you read further in these comments,in particular by ph3s1968, you will read WHY they used the '68 tail lights instead of using the originals.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
american cars are only fast in a straight line there shit in the corners, y do u think nascar is so popular in the usa? just shows the arogance of the usa
What is it with you Europeans and this cornering stuff?! Every freakin car on the road
has to freakin corner or its a piece of crap! Yes straight line speed, mediocre cornering; that how US hot cars are built this is not new! and Nascar is so popular in the US because its where it started.
The 70 has horizontal tailights like the 69's,the 68's have four round tailights. The 70's front has chrome all around the grill,the 68's just has chrome bumper below grill.
That would be 426 Hemi. Chrysler made a 400--I believe after 1972--but it was a real under-performing slug. The 383 Magnum, or even the 340, would eat the 400 for lunch. In the late 60's/early 70's, the only Hemi was 426 cubic inches.
I have to give the guys at Pure Vision respect for building such clean and unique rides. That being said, I also have to say that they are not my cup of tea. I can't help it but I'm stuck in the 70's. I prefer the spartanous beauty of a stripped down street freak as opposed to having my ass sunken down into 7 inches of padded, heated leather. I still like to work on my own car instead of dropping it off at a shop, along with my checkbook, and waiting for the call to come pick it up.
We at Pure Vision thank you for the complement! We know that the cars we build are not to everyones taste and only ask that people take the time to appreciate them for what they are. We all started out woking on our own cars in our driveways and for that matter we still do. I would like to be fair to the customers though and say that most of them do not have the time even if they have the knowledge to do things themselves, and most of them are very involved with the design process. Drive hard!
Start mixing & matching model years on a big-name very expensive buildup, and people will praise you for being "unique" or "risk-taking."
Do the same thing when you're a bucks-down hobbyist with a 383/auto customized project, and the same people will say you're a cheapskate hacking the poor car up.
The '68 tail lights were put in so the car would look more Ferrari-esque and allow the stripe to go down the back of the car without being interrupted by the tail lights. The stripe on Petrol was patterned after a Ferrari stripe. It was also chosen to help minimize the huge chrome front bumper.
No Pure Vision did not put the "road runner" horn on this car.
I asked about that, and my fiance told me that they never put it on the dyno but they know it has to be high 500s because it just has a mild street engine in it.
The tail lights are not impala. They are from a '68 Charger. The rest of the body is from a '70 Charger. There are a lot more highly modified parts on this car. My fiance works for Pure Vision Design and worked on this car with Steve Strope.
You can tell EXACTLY by the front end that it's a 1970. ONLY 1970 Chargers had the wraparound bumper. This car is indeed a '70 with '68 taillights for some inexplicable reason.
I don't think so. Double-circle taillights are unoriginal, used on everything from Corvettes, Chevelles, Ferraris, Impalas & a dozen other cars. Even the Pontiac G2 fer chrissake. The long taillights were a lot more original & distinctive and looked evil & badass.
For those questioning the 68 tail lights: The stripe design was chosen as a way to make the huge chome bumper on the '70 flow into the car instead of looking like an afterthought. We liked the stripe wide but it just didn't look right in the drawings cutting through the original lights. We also didn't like that there was no orange visable from the rear if the stripe ended at the back of the trunck... so we changed the tail panel to allow the stripe to flow down the back uninterupted.
I remember reading about this ride in Mopar Muscle - nice car, love the power choice - 472 hemi power......not to mention the awesome suspension and brakes and other goodies this car has.
Yeah your right man it's going on the top gear peoples heads too, they like cars like the Toyota Aygo and the ugly Honda small rounded-of box vehicle PFF...
When i was in London i saw some stangs' though, cool!
Amazing. 8 gallons to the mile. Love it. Got a '68 GT stang (fastback) and '69 chevelle modified chassis and power train.
As far as the tree hugging enviromentalists, you should put a muffler on a cow's butt because they emmit methane when they fart. Everything should be in balance pal.
and your the dumb one..... i'd take a lambo and then sell it and buy a 1970 charger, 1970 cuda, and a 1987 regal gnx. and still have money for a house.
Interesting bastard indeed..70 front, 68 rear, shaved sidemarkers from the looks of it...I personally think the paint job is awful, and I'm not a fan of the ricer "colored brakes peeking through Dubbz" look, either. It's a muscle-car, fer chrissake!
Technically they aren't Dubbs. This car only has 19" wheels and that to improve cornering and braking for safety so that when the car IS out on the road the driver doesn't have to worry so much about the people around him ruining his car. Also I'm pretty sure that the colored brake thing started on European cars, not "ricers" Thanks for taking an interest though!
19's on a classic muscle-car is just wrong. So are colored brake calipers. Dif'rent strokes 4 dif'rent folks, I suppose. I guess I've earned the right to criticize because I own a 1970 Charger that I wouldn't dare to bastardize or ricer-ize or European-ize or whatever. It's AMERICAN muscle. :)
Dude, thats what pro touring is all about. old school looks with new technology. these cars are meant to be driven and beat on, not sit in a garage. most are built to be driven fast and hard. Hell, check out the cars on bullrun, many of the classics on there are pro-tourers. dead reliable, and monster power.
Driven and beat on, eh? Seems like a lot of money and mods just to burn a couple donuts. :) Anyway, I wasn't referring to the car's function, I was referring to its form. I grew up loving muscle cars, I now own two (70 Charger & 86 Grand National) so you won't change my opinion that doing this shit to a classic muscle car is just wrong. Period. :)
Oh, I do. And if you don't think the '86 and '87 "Turbo T's" and GNs aren't classic muscle, you evidently don't know much about performance. A GN will eat any Charger for lunch, with the exception of a blown 426 Hemi. I know because I own the best of both worlds. What do you drive, I wonder? LOL
Dude, your Grand national can be fast, but its a late 80's beater. every other drug dealer in california has one. Those and Fox body mustangs. powerful, but really shitty looks and quality. Im done here. have fun at the drag strip. Ill be at laguna seca racing a real performance car.
i love them all but prefer a ford if i did not love em all i would not be watching this video. my comment before was to the guy who said u r hurting the enviornment. fuck that, burn em up. AMERICAN MUSCLE is the way to go. with cars that get 7 mpg and d big blocks
I understood where your comment was directed to. Mine was directed there too. I'm glad you enjoy all American muscle cars! I feel the same, they're all great, but I have a bias towards Fords too! :)
Its not like we go out EVERY day doing things like this. It was ONE day in February. It is also up to the owners and builders of cars whether to do events like this, so it is THEIR decision to waste gas or not.
Look, you have your opinions and others have theirs. I have my own personal favorite type of car that differs from others. Mopar cars are great and when cleaned up really well they rock. Personally I'm a Ford fan, but I'm learning to be more well-rounded. Maybe you should too.
This is a '70 Charger. My boyfriend works for Steve Strope of Pure Vision and also worked on building it. Although they did put a '68 Charger rear end on it as well as a '71 Charger dash, I am 100% sure it is a 1970 Charger.
If you have any questions about it, let me know. If I can't answer them, my boyfriend or his boss can answer it. But thanks for trying to correct me.
This has been flagged as spam show
"@wowleo1 I'm sorry you don't agree with what Pure Vision designed. However, it most definitely is a 70 Charger with 68 taillights. It was designed as a whole car with a European feel.
llilsass 1 year ago"
Not gonna @ you, because it's a year old... But, it's AMERICAN MUSCLE. Why the fuck do you want to make it 'European'? Just by taking a 68's tail lights and sticking them on a 70 doesn't make the damn thing European.
ManyTailedFox 1 week ago
Mmmmm,,,sexy Dodge Charger 1970 *Homer's Drool* This car is amazing. I hope that in a life time I can save enough to have one like it.
Yustax 1 month ago
68 tail lights -.-
osGroove 3 months ago
dear santa..
sliprok100 3 months ago
70 ft. end... 68 tail lights and my 3 year old leaves longer shid marks in his undies
JVPRCNG 6 months ago
scenic in the most literal meaning of the word !!!
CHUUMPASS 7 months ago
Does anyone know what kind of wheels those are?
silverbullett19 8 months ago
Does anyone know what kind of wheels those are?
silverbullett19 8 months ago
lovin the paint job
thewaltman2009 9 months ago
shitty driver
kain161718 9 months ago
Dear Santa...
Seventaiji 10 months ago
poor car the mods ruind it and its a 68 not a 70 dumb fuck
clockwork624 1 year ago
@clockwork624 Ahahahah Look whos talking.. I never ever have seen a 68 with a wraparound bumper, and it doesn't have round marker lights. So keep your mouth shut.
The68chargerlover 1 year ago
@The68chargerlover aww ur mad cus ur a dumb fuck too that shits modified the body is a 68's and the tail lights so yea have fun with ur dumb shit self
clockwork624 1 year ago
@clockwork624 Hahaha ok dumbass... I'm not gonna waste my time arguing with you
The68chargerlover 1 year ago
@clockwork624 Haha its a 70, thats coming from the guys at pure vision, i asked them when i got the paint code for the orange
redbullwrcmember 10 months ago
@redbullwrcmember well it has the body style of a 70 and grill but 68 tail lights
clockwork624 10 months ago
Nice
70CHARGERREGISTRY 1 year ago
damn thats a dream car rite their, screw farari American muscle thrives all!!
f5superstar 1 year ago
It is a '70 with a '68 tail. Why, I don't know. It has the wrap-around bumper up front even though it's painted and not chromed and the doors are '70 doors. The other telling marks are the side marker/blinker lights but it looks like they removed them because I don't see '68 style, '70 style or any side marker lights on it for that matter.
dstrzelec 1 year ago
68 or 70 dont matter its still a charger, I just dont really care for the paint scheme
68chargerlover 1 year ago
That cars a 1970 because of the chrome ring around the front end but has 1968 tail lights.
ChadBubbaTravis 1 year ago 2
who does that lol
its a 68
who will go through all the trouble to change the tail lights
wowleo1 1 year ago
@wowleo1 I'm sorry you don't agree with what Pure Vision designed. However, it most definitely is a 70 Charger with 68 taillights. It was designed as a whole car with a European feel.
llilsass 1 year ago
@llilsass funny how people will talk before they read. Personally I like the idea - reminiscent of the 70's Opel Manta.
5ive10 1 year ago
@5ive10 Thanks! It sure is frustrating that people don't read before they post.
llilsass 1 year ago
@wowleo1 it takes about 15 min to switch the lights. all it is a couple bolts
generalleegoku 1 year ago
@wowleo1 well as you probably dont know its not that easy to find these cars. And this car was mopar muscle magazine more than you will accomplish
Mr68charger440 1 year ago
awesome man i love this car but it is a 1968 you can see that on the rear lights the are round by the 70 the are straigt .
jalhay 1 year ago
@jalhay please read my comment I just posted for Mr70ChallengerRT
llilsass 1 year ago
thats actually a 68 look at the taillights
Mr70ChallengerRT 1 year ago
@Mr70ChallengerRT No it is NOT a 68, but rather, a 70 with 68 taillights. I've been around this car for almost 3 years and have heard the stories about all the little things done to it. The creators at Pure Vision decided that for this concept, the 68 taillights would look better than the original 70.
llilsass 1 year ago
@llilsass oh ok my bad
Mr70ChallengerRT 1 year ago
Hey isn't this a '68?!
colddietcoke 1 year ago
@colddietcoke No it isn't a 68. It is a '70 with '68 tail lights.
llilsass 1 year ago
that has such a nice sound to it to go with the hp
xXWeltchXx 1 year ago
The 68 tail lights look terrible. The 70 tail lights are alot better.
SuperKing1320 2 years ago
Right, the 70 is the perfect combination of 68' and 69': no chrome in the grill and the long tail lights.
Rotzloeffi 1 year ago
I Always Wanted!
durexplayNo1 2 years ago
thats a 68'.
zackattatck 2 years ago
@zackattatck No it isn't a 68. It is a '70 with '68 tail lights.
llilsass 2 years ago
isn't that a 68
DylnHoCho 2 years ago
@DylnHoCho No it isn't a 68. It is a '70 with '68 tail lights.
llilsass 2 years ago
did you guys changed the rear lights on this one, it looks like it has the 68' tail lights. am I right?
619426 2 years ago
Yes you are right. Pure Vision decided for the look of the car that 68 taillights would be better than the original
llilsass 2 years ago
i never seen a charger diesel ?
marc5007 2 years ago
It's not diesel
llilsass 2 years ago
whats the petrol for ?
marc5007 2 years ago
The company Pure Vision designed it for
llilsass 2 years ago
O Cara e ruim de braço !!!!!
Hermatolveio 2 years ago
What a FANTASTIC location, where is this??
Mac670 2 years ago
@Mac670 It was the training center for all emergency vehicle drivers in LA. It was just up the 15 from Pomona.
llilsass 2 years ago
@llilsass Not sure where that is, not from the USA, the mountains in the background I mean, gorgeous backdrop, hesitate to say this for geographical ignorance alert.. :) but are they the "Rockies" ?
Mac670 2 years ago
I love this sound!! 5/5
valcerfabri 2 years ago
I bet the owner loves the Car more than his girlfriend/wife.
Gulli1000 2 years ago
Well it was made for a company with 3 owners. So I'm sure they love their girlfriends/wives more than the car.
llilsass 2 years ago
What a skirt! All that road and all that car and thats all you got?? Pussy!
MrFlogga 2 years ago
More happened that day and not all of it got recorded. Sorry.
llilsass 2 years ago
Didn't know those Chargers could fishtail like that... That's what's up... I need a Charger that turns like a dream...
billionaireby16 2 years ago
This charger turns like a dream. Only a car with superior handling can turn like this. All those stock muscle cars can make doughnuts but none of them can look like this. Cheers
SuperBee84 2 years ago
is 68. size, sides, tail lights, many details, is a Charger R/t 68.
rbnmadrid 2 years ago
I'm sorry, but after being around the car in person as well as knowing and speaking with Steve Strope and the crew at Pure Vision Designs, this is a '70 with '68 tail lights. I got the story straight from the source.
llilsass 2 years ago
Yess, im sure. .. is a 70 with 68 taillaits!!.. . but why is a 70 charger?.. .R= thats is because in the front of the car it brings a part chrome, 68 and 69 dont bring, in the video it painted orange.
Regards.
rbnmadrid 2 years ago
yes the front bumper is painted orange. It is part of the design the Pure Vision came up with. The thought that a huge chrome bumper would not flow with the design style they were looking for.
llilsass 2 years ago
That is quite the hill-billy buggy. Do you have card board cut-outs of Bo and Luke in the back seats. Add a dixie horn and some orange paint you you are almost there. Well one year too new.
trentoncoin 2 years ago
Dude I laugh my head off. in all good meanings. Southern by the grace of god.
SuperBee84 2 years ago
sorry, no cardboard cut outs for the car...
llilsass 2 years ago
omg...the sound of this car is incredible
dannyd5341 2 years ago 2
i like these cars! it's the purest form of a car, i now cause i have worked on 60s mustangs.
offroadrc 2 years ago 2
its a 68 i can tell by its rear and and, i dont mean its tail lights..
boytjow 2 years ago
No, I'm sorry, you are mistaken. It was originally a 1970 Charger. Pure Vision Designs and Steve Strope customized this car. I have ridden in it a few times and heard the stories. It is a 70 Charger with 68 tail lights.
llilsass 2 years ago
thats a 68 charger :S
boytjow 2 years ago
If you read further in these comments,in particular by ph3s1968, you will read that this is NOT a 68 charger, but rather a 70 charger with 68 tail lights.
llilsass 2 years ago
Yeah I just noticed that, I'd rather take the '68 though. I like the round tail lamps and plain grille better.
74camarolt 2 years ago
don't get me wrong, the 68's were awesome too but why mix and match? Either way, this car is bad ass!
Dieselcharger70 2 years ago 2
Comment removed
Dieselcharger70 2 years ago
What the heck? It has the front of a 70 (look at the bumper) but a 68 rear? why?
Dieselcharger70 2 years ago
its a 68
charger70and68 2 years ago
It's a 1970 Charger with '68 tail lights
llilsass 2 years ago
well thats stupid
charger70and68 2 years ago
This was the design by Pure Vision. If you read further in these comments,in particular by ph3s1968, you will read WHY they used the '68 tail lights instead of using the originals.
llilsass 2 years ago
NICE PAINT!!!!
QWILDER 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
american cars are only fast in a straight line there shit in the corners, y do u think nascar is so popular in the usa? just shows the arogance of the usa
davetrace123 2 years ago
What is it with you Europeans and this cornering stuff?! Every freakin car on the road
has to freakin corner or its a piece of crap! Yes straight line speed, mediocre cornering; that how US hot cars are built this is not new! and Nascar is so popular in the US because its where it started.
dude486 2 years ago
Looks like a '70 with '68 tailights!
gtpluvr 2 years ago
what's the difference between the 70 & the 68 body? 0_o
mfuji00001 2 years ago
The 70 has horizontal tailights like the 69's,the 68's have four round tailights. The 70's front has chrome all around the grill,the 68's just has chrome bumper below grill.
gtpluvr 2 years ago
The front park-lights, side-markers and rear window are different too, but that's getting nit-picky. :)
Coelacanth97 2 years ago
thanks I wanted to know exactly what was different -_-
mfuji00001 2 years ago
thats what i thought to
jellybean545 2 years ago
sounds like a 400 hemi with headers open. anyways whatever it is it is beautiful sound.
xXA5pa5aW0lfXx 2 years ago
That would be 426 Hemi. Chrysler made a 400--I believe after 1972--but it was a real under-performing slug. The 383 Magnum, or even the 340, would eat the 400 for lunch. In the late 60's/early 70's, the only Hemi was 426 cubic inches.
Coelacanth97 2 years ago
Ahh..my mistake. Thanks for the correction.
xXA5pa5aW0lfXx 2 years ago
I have to give the guys at Pure Vision respect for building such clean and unique rides. That being said, I also have to say that they are not my cup of tea. I can't help it but I'm stuck in the 70's. I prefer the spartanous beauty of a stripped down street freak as opposed to having my ass sunken down into 7 inches of padded, heated leather. I still like to work on my own car instead of dropping it off at a shop, along with my checkbook, and waiting for the call to come pick it up.
v6x666 3 years ago
WORD! and WORD! to mbdks' comment too!
UFO29 2 years ago
We at Pure Vision thank you for the complement! We know that the cars we build are not to everyones taste and only ask that people take the time to appreciate them for what they are. We all started out woking on our own cars in our driveways and for that matter we still do. I would like to be fair to the customers though and say that most of them do not have the time even if they have the knowledge to do things themselves, and most of them are very involved with the design process. Drive hard!
ph3s1968 2 years ago
Start mixing & matching model years on a big-name very expensive buildup, and people will praise you for being "unique" or "risk-taking."
Do the same thing when you're a bucks-down hobbyist with a 383/auto customized project, and the same people will say you're a cheapskate hacking the poor car up.
mbdks 3 years ago
Best comment Ive seen..I agree 100%
DR440 2 years ago
Listen to that cam.........You couldn't time that b!tch with a calendar..
Huntin' big time.!!!
One of these days.......I will reward myself with retarded debt to own one.
bkm72 3 years ago
I was just about to tell you that was a '68. Why did they retro fit the '68 lights? I LOVE the '69-'70 lights.
What a sound..!!!! Those Cars a MEAN.!!!! Did you do the "Road Runner" horn?
Meep Meep.!!
bkm72 3 years ago
The '68 tail lights were put in so the car would look more Ferrari-esque and allow the stripe to go down the back of the car without being interrupted by the tail lights. The stripe on Petrol was patterned after a Ferrari stripe. It was also chosen to help minimize the huge chrome front bumper.
No Pure Vision did not put the "road runner" horn on this car.
llilsass 3 years ago
ohhhh so you basically built her from the ground up then so how much hp does she kick
Stylenz 3 years ago
I asked about that, and my fiance told me that they never put it on the dyno but they know it has to be high 500s because it just has a mild street engine in it.
llilsass 3 years ago
thats a 1968 dodge charger dumbass the look a like impala tail lights give that away and you can tell that by the front end thats its not a 1970
Stylenz 3 years ago
The tail lights are not impala. They are from a '68 Charger. The rest of the body is from a '70 Charger. There are a lot more highly modified parts on this car. My fiance works for Pure Vision Design and worked on this car with Steve Strope.
llilsass 3 years ago
You can tell EXACTLY by the front end that it's a 1970. ONLY 1970 Chargers had the wraparound bumper. This car is indeed a '70 with '68 taillights for some inexplicable reason.
Coelacanth97 2 years ago
cuz, 68' taillights look cooler? idk. I think a 68' is cooler all together
Jayden426 2 years ago
I don't think so. Double-circle taillights are unoriginal, used on everything from Corvettes, Chevelles, Ferraris, Impalas & a dozen other cars. Even the Pontiac G2 fer chrissake. The long taillights were a lot more original & distinctive and looked evil & badass.
Coelacanth97 2 years ago
For those questioning the 68 tail lights: The stripe design was chosen as a way to make the huge chome bumper on the '70 flow into the car instead of looking like an afterthought. We liked the stripe wide but it just didn't look right in the drawings cutting through the original lights. We also didn't like that there was no orange visable from the rear if the stripe ended at the back of the trunck... so we changed the tail panel to allow the stripe to flow down the back uninterupted.
ph3s1968 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
WANNABE IMPORT
894048005 3 years ago
that baby is mad clean!! props
onixbeats 3 years ago 2
badass car love the black & orange combo
chaser2273 3 years ago 2
I remember reading about this ride in Mopar Muscle - nice car, love the power choice - 472 hemi power......not to mention the awesome suspension and brakes and other goodies this car has.
greenmetal1 3 years ago 2
Nice car mate,gotta love a Charger
falconhell69 3 years ago 3
thats a monster. it scary. yee haa
lewisjp8young 3 years ago
I'd love to see that car restored properly: Correct 1970 tail lights, original wheels, etc.
Hate to see the old cars all customized (ruined), but that's just me.
crispiegee1 3 years ago
Go to a Chrysler show and you'll see plenty that all look the same just in different colors.
ph3s1968 2 years ago
oh man wot a car, we got crap in the UK and u got chevy's and dodge's :(
maxrome67 3 years ago 4
Yeah your right man it's going on the top gear peoples heads too, they like cars like the Toyota Aygo and the ugly Honda small rounded-of box vehicle PFF...
When i was in London i saw some stangs' though, cool!
CDTbossy 3 years ago 3
I swear I've seen your car at a car show somewhere before....
1093T 3 years ago
isnt that a 68 charger
DylnHoCho 3 years ago
70 with 68 tail lights
roflman 3 years ago 2
Amazing. 8 gallons to the mile. Love it. Got a '68 GT stang (fastback) and '69 chevelle modified chassis and power train.
As far as the tree hugging enviromentalists, you should put a muffler on a cow's butt because they emmit methane when they fart. Everything should be in balance pal.
llilsass---keep it rippin'--love your car.
ledzeppelinrules984 3 years ago
I'd take a 1970 dodge charger over a lambo anyday...not even joking.
American muscle for the fucking win
Frostshock139O 3 years ago 6
and your the dumb one..... i'd take a lambo and then sell it and buy a 1970 charger, 1970 cuda, and a 1987 regal gnx. and still have money for a house.
shotgun8left 3 years ago
Rofl, right. You totally took the statement way out of line, fucking retard. The question was one or the other, not a story.
lrn2read
Frostshock139O 3 years ago
Interesting bastard indeed..70 front, 68 rear, shaved sidemarkers from the looks of it...I personally think the paint job is awful, and I'm not a fan of the ricer "colored brakes peeking through Dubbz" look, either. It's a muscle-car, fer chrissake!
Coelacanth97 3 years ago
Technically they aren't Dubbs. This car only has 19" wheels and that to improve cornering and braking for safety so that when the car IS out on the road the driver doesn't have to worry so much about the people around him ruining his car. Also I'm pretty sure that the colored brake thing started on European cars, not "ricers" Thanks for taking an interest though!
ph3s1968 2 years ago
19's on a classic muscle-car is just wrong. So are colored brake calipers. Dif'rent strokes 4 dif'rent folks, I suppose. I guess I've earned the right to criticize because I own a 1970 Charger that I wouldn't dare to bastardize or ricer-ize or European-ize or whatever. It's AMERICAN muscle. :)
Coelacanth97 2 years ago
personally i think that big meats on 15" wheels will set off any old muscle car nicely...
that being said... some of the older cars can look down right slick with the big wheels on them...
AND with that being said i have seen some disastorous looking muscle cars with big 17's and 18's on them...
highsierra53 2 years ago
Dude, thats what pro touring is all about. old school looks with new technology. these cars are meant to be driven and beat on, not sit in a garage. most are built to be driven fast and hard. Hell, check out the cars on bullrun, many of the classics on there are pro-tourers. dead reliable, and monster power.
vivalaking 2 years ago
Driven and beat on, eh? Seems like a lot of money and mods just to burn a couple donuts. :) Anyway, I wasn't referring to the car's function, I was referring to its form. I grew up loving muscle cars, I now own two (70 Charger & 86 Grand National) so you won't change my opinion that doing this shit to a classic muscle car is just wrong. Period. :)
Coelacanth97 2 years ago
Either way, his money, his preference. Enjoy your "classic muscle" grand national.
vivalaking 2 years ago
Oh, I do. And if you don't think the '86 and '87 "Turbo T's" and GNs aren't classic muscle, you evidently don't know much about performance. A GN will eat any Charger for lunch, with the exception of a blown 426 Hemi. I know because I own the best of both worlds. What do you drive, I wonder? LOL
Coelacanth97 2 years ago
Dude, your Grand national can be fast, but its a late 80's beater. every other drug dealer in california has one. Those and Fox body mustangs. powerful, but really shitty looks and quality. Im done here. have fun at the drag strip. Ill be at laguna seca racing a real performance car.
vivalaking 2 years ago
At 21 years old, somehow I doubt that. Dude. ;)
Coelacanth97 2 years ago
i never told you what i drive. a built subaru wrx is a well balanced car with ample power on tap, and at 21, its very feasible.
vivalaking 2 years ago
vivalaRice! O ya, I'd rather have a Subaru than a Charger or Grand National. LOL
Coelacanth97 2 years ago
1970 charger ?there are 1968's rearlights ... :\
chargerrt426hemi 3 years ago
Yes they are. That's why this is a customization not a restoration
llilsass 3 years ago
A 70 nose and tail lights from a 1968? Its a basterd but still cool.
raymoundcist88 3 years ago
i love them all but prefer a ford if i did not love em all i would not be watching this video. my comment before was to the guy who said u r hurting the enviornment. fuck that, burn em up. AMERICAN MUSCLE is the way to go. with cars that get 7 mpg and d big blocks
6fordfairlane 3 years ago
I understood where your comment was directed to. Mine was directed there too. I'm glad you enjoy all American muscle cars! I feel the same, they're all great, but I have a bias towards Fords too! :)
llilsass 3 years ago
nice... but too short
tiloky 3 years ago
Sorry, I totally agree, but this is all that Steve decided to do that day.
llilsass 3 years ago
Cool I've seen this car on several magazines always wondered how it sounded, sounds gRrrrreat.
ordep72 3 years ago
shark!
jafar7523629 3 years ago
nice
chevyvictor 3 years ago
Agreed! Hang in there. Don't let the mis-informed ruin hot rodding fun!
captkozmo 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
wow this is so freaking stupid.you ar e hurting the enviromet!!! pleases stop wasting gasoline!!!
stuntsheriff 3 years ago
Its not like we go out EVERY day doing things like this. It was ONE day in February. It is also up to the owners and builders of cars whether to do events like this, so it is THEIR decision to waste gas or not.
llilsass 3 years ago
Gimme a break!If you don't want to see true Hot Rods doing what Hot Rods do, don't open the video
captkozmo 3 years ago 4
your a fucking pussy... what a wank of a comment fuckin care bear tree huger go fuck off and save the whales...
polishfarmer 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
wow. big words for a moron. mopar sucks
stuntsheriff 3 years ago
mopar or no car
zg018 3 years ago
only a hemi makes my ole lady shemi!
02ramfan 3 years ago
No you are hurting it by breathing, please stop! (joke, not to be taken seriously)
6fordfairlane 3 years ago
no finer hot rod than a 66 fairlane gt FORD rules,mopar sucks
stuntsheriff 3 years ago
Look, you have your opinions and others have theirs. I have my own personal favorite type of car that differs from others. Mopar cars are great and when cleaned up really well they rock. Personally I'm a Ford fan, but I'm learning to be more well-rounded. Maybe you should too.
llilsass 3 years ago
F fucked
O on
R race
D day
zg018 3 years ago
First
On
Race
Day
rancherodave 3 years ago
Fixed
Or
Repaired
Daily
Found
On
Road
Dead
PerryDubya 3 years ago
esta re bueno el video,,me encanto la patinada!!
llamamemassi 3 years ago
I'm confused. What is that thing? It's a '70 with '68 tail lights. Nice car though. Sounds GREAT!!!
captkozmo 3 years ago
It is a custom car and Steve Strope of Pure Vision decided how it would look.
llilsass 3 years ago
My works for PETROL-ad
Nickisspanish17 3 years ago
IMPRESIONANTE ....... el sueño de muchosss!!!!
alaneloyg 3 years ago
Well ok then!! No harm done haha
eurosport94 3 years ago
God the sound of a cammed Mopar is awesome
That's a 68 Charger BTW
eurosport94 3 years ago
This is a '70 Charger. My boyfriend works for Steve Strope of Pure Vision and also worked on building it. Although they did put a '68 Charger rear end on it as well as a '71 Charger dash, I am 100% sure it is a 1970 Charger.
If you have any questions about it, let me know. If I can't answer them, my boyfriend or his boss can answer it. But thanks for trying to correct me.
llilsass 3 years ago