the pros would be the world would be conservative and using sustainable energy, the cons are that energy companies will be knocked out of the game, which means millions of jobs losses, which means economic meltdowns. I'd rather have a brighter future though than no future.
It was not NASA who invented this, it was Andrea Rossi (ecat.com) who first came up with this idea and made prototypes, NASA came along and bought the whole thing for 2milion $. I'm writing this just because people quickly forgetting about the real inventor ;)
@naruko17 Amen for your comment. People often think that Gov't has the answer to everything, but it usually the entrepreneur/inventor who drives new changes for society.
@aboothunitedstates thats the thing chaos could break no car from now should have t run on gas well earth gas couse this gas comes from moon rock u canlook it up
@FreeEnergyTruth that was a great video, i'm building a heat engine which converts waste heat into electricity, may be it could be used alongside this sort of thing. it's a crowd funded project, you'll find it on my channel. Let me know what you think.
So to hell with the future for everyone, as long as your propane sales are going well that's all that matters. Stop worshipping the dollar - it's going to come crashing down anyway.
Can't wait to see this stuff release in 2020 when the gas reserves hit nil. Whose ready to adopt this energy when it's expensive as hell to drive what's left of the defunct gas and oil industries! All together now 1..2..3 GO GREED!!
Unfortunately the 1st law of the Universe keeps on holding true:
Power_of_money(t) > Power_of_anything_else(t), for any t
The Science is being affected by this law as well. Every field of the Science is being infested with corruption and greediness nowadays. No wonder there hasn't been a groundbreaking discovery since Einstein's Theories. The big corporations drive research at their liking, since they're the ones who fund it. The truth will always be covered and never unveiled.
@LouistheHedgehog No, but it is a similar process. Fusion works by adding mass to non-radioactive materials till they split on their own. Fission is achieved by splitting radioactive material. At least, that's how I understand it.
@Vidyadude who patented it? I know Rossi and Focardi wanted to begin making their's available at the end of last year but were only held off by their patent gaining. I find it very stinky that NASA is now making claims of doing this using exactly what the Italian scientists have been doing for the last few years and before they get their patent.
I'm guessing this hasn't caused waves because it's either not economically viable or doesn't have a great energy return on investment. Probably the former.
i haven't seen or heard about this nowhere, if this technology never gets into the market because of greedy corporations then i will know for sure that the earth is doomed.
I can't believe this is no where to be seen in media or has very little attention on the internet. I mean this is probably the greatest invention this century, it will literary change the world.
These guys should give credit to Adam Widom and Lewis Larsen, who came up with the Widom-Larsen theory to expain this. There's no reference to either of these scientists or to the name of this theory. In academia, this boarders plagiarism.
Deuterium is the most losely bound nuclie. Helium 4 is one of the most tightly bound. The fusion is Really cold ~ 200K; therefore the linear momentum operator is not so strict as in plasma fusion.
Deuterons are asymmetrical nuclie. A proton bound to a neutron, but the wavefuction is symmetrical isospin 1. They are Bosons. They do not obey the pauli exclusion principle. The de broglie wavelength exceeds the ionic radii of metal solids. The density of hydrogen in metal hydrides is greater than solid Hydrogen. d+d=He4+Q, He4(Ni,?)Cu +/- Q.
@jocell202, I've watched and read up about the war on cold fusion and am beginning to come around. as an engineer, the theories behind it are less important to me than whether the thing actually works or not. If it works, let the physicists come up with a theory later.
It wouldn't surprise me if energy companies are keeping this quiet, the number of patents they own to prevent new energy sources being exploited is shocking. I'll wait to see if this reactor sells but will keep an open mind
@maxsteel86 Awesome, i am not getting your replies in my email box though. Just so you know whats up if i don't reply. Have you seen the "FREE ENERGY Invention Secrecy Still Going Strong" video yet? Some good data. Of course nothing is free but we could have had clean cheep energy many years ago. And if people don't beleave in over unity just mention the splitting of the atom, anyways why wait, watch my save money on fuel with one wire vid and get started tomorrow.
@jocell202, ok I might've considered looking at your links but then you claim Pons and Fleishman's experiments as being real. They themselves admitted to lying about the production of fused elements. There was none. They made it up. That much everyone agrees on.
Also your electrolysis video is nothing more than extracting hydrogen. Prove me wrong, drive the car around for a while with the fuel line disconnected and upload a convincing video
@maxsteel86 Part 2: #2 I should not have to explain this to you but our current science implies that the amount of hydrogen generated from alternator is not enough to improve and produce the millage increase we are seeing, you don't have to be self sustained to prove over unity. By the way I am not getting your replies in my inbox?
@maxsteel86 part 1: #1 Pons and Fleishman did not lie nor did they admit to lieing. If you have proof and by proof i man from the horses mouth i would love to see it, for proof it was real and other scientists where replicating it watch the war on cold fusion, proof of the suppression in there as well,
@maxsteel86 Ps, and i don't even use the generator, the spark plugs firing ejects electrons, the positive ions in the battery then draw out the freed electrons rendering the ionized molecules to saturate the block and aid in the combustion chamber, transmutation is also a common thing with the joe cells, this suggest the presence of free roaming neutrons.
@jocell202, can you honestly tell me you're being objective here or is the promise of a near limitless, clean energy source clouding your judgement? I read the papers on cold fusion back in 2006, the original scientists admitted they made up the bit of detecting new elements after the reaction. No one ever managed to get it to work.
Feel free to take a look at Rossi's demonstration of his working 470kW E-Cat. There were so many things wrong with the setup, its too long to write in one comment
@maxsteel86 Yes I am being objective here, in fact i have a video called save money on fuel with one wire that you can do yourself to see this is real. Anyone can write and article and say anything. Look at the links on my video where NASA, the US NAVY as well as the US ARMY as well as a positive analysis on cold fusion from the DoD saying this is real, it was real in the 80s when Pons and Fleishman did it and its real now. Also watch the war on cold fusion.
So - in summary: We were right; cold fusion is possible. Overunity is possible (he mentions "excess") and now realize they better start getting the word out before they get caught with their pants down by some backroom scientist like Andrea Rossi.
@ksw2599 to good to be true? Lots of people have been trying to tell us this for years, watch the war on cold fusion, and if you would like to save money on fuel watch my save money on fuel with one wire vid.
@maxsteel86 My apologies but it is sooo frustrating trying to give this information free for years and having to deal with you skeptics, knowing full well that every comment you make may detour others from trying it themselves. Knowing you have done no work on the subject and think you know it all, seeing the suppression of this and it goes right over your heads, it is extremely frustrating, no excuse for my outburst though. I just dont even see how people can be so blind in the mind.
@twasbrillig33, I know how much people wish this was true but look back at the Perendev Motor scam that happened not long ago. Scientists said no, wishful thinkers said yes. Turns out it was a scam.
Some conspiracy theories I believe but this I dont. Cold fusion proved to be false. Many scientists, unrelated to governments and energy companies tried and proved it wasn't true.
The Perendev motor was also in production. If this was true, dont you think there'd be a bigger deal about it?
@maxsteel86 I am so sick of idiots that need to have their reality dictated to them by their peers, the worse thing about it is they actually think they are highly intelligent. So did you expect this to be written in the sky with airplanes? Do you expect the controlled presstatuts in the media to cover this? Click on the description box of my save money on fuel with one wire vid to see the links to the DoD, US NAVY and air force for your peer review nonsense.
What is this, April Fools? Cold fusion was already proven to be a lie way back in the 1990s. If NASA suddenly do have such a breakthrough technology, how comes the first time most people are hearing about it are on a Youtube video? No publications in any peer reviewed scientific journal? And everyone lapping it up without showing any skepticism. That's not a scientific approach, that's just wishful thinking
@maxsteel86 proven to be a lie (IE WILLFUL SUPPRESSION) by nobody but big energy cabal shills, do some serious research (starting with Tesla) before you make such brainwashed and naive commentate - Look up Andrea Rossi and his E-CAT, it's already in production (PESN dot com). You should be very happy you are WRONG.
Next year thx to italian scientist Andrea Rossi and his team you will be able to buy your own 10kw Ecat home unit. It works with nickel and it will be very cheap
if this really works then what with the Americans?Tesla also was preparing something like that and they hinder him because it would be free to the people.
@FreeEnergyTruth I'm going to be honest with you man, I'm not sure how some videos get dislikes, such as this one, mostly because its an informative video about cold fusion. Maybe they were searching for something else and came across this, and clicked dislike because it was not what they were searching for.
@FreeEnergyTruth The dislikers would be the shills of those who have something to lose. Oil companies, coal-burning power companies and the governments who get tax revenue from them.
@FreeEnergyTruth "Something wrong with clean, abundant energy?"
There's nothing wrong with it if it's real.
But a minority of people believe things based on whether there is real evidence rather than whether they have an emotional need for it to be true. Since no direct evidence is shown, cited or even claimed for the possibility of net energy output with this technique, and it has never been independently reproduced, the tone of the video could be seen as misleading.
The oppression you allude to is a consequence of human nature, as evidenced by it's existence for all of recorded history, not the result of a particular configuration of technologies.
Abundant energy might make you freer in some superficial material sense (though only slightly unless you live in the third world) but it won't even scratch the surface of the real control that the powerful elites exert over the rest (which targets thought).
@learrus You've ignored the context of what we were actually talking about, but anyway, if you want to change the subject lets.
"it's about not turning our planet into a toxic fucking swamp."
Yes, I agree.
We could do that with today's technology. It's not a question of technology, it's a question of making the environment a higher priority than profit. Even if one of these speculative technologies panned out, our current capitalism.gov will still use it to turn our planet into toxic swamp.
So if you sought to imply that anyone who doesn't agree that this is a real and feasible technology must want the earth to be a toxic swamp, I disagree.
Even if it can be made to produce net energy, it's irrelevant to that question because we already have technology which could do that without utterly despoiling the earth, and we choose not to use it. It isn't covered up, there's no conspiracy, people are just too ignorant and governments are just too corrupt.
The whole reason fossil fuel is so popular today is because it's profitable. And it's profitable because it's inefficient and difficult to get.
If one confiscated all of the money in the fossil industry, subsidies and cartel trading profits included, it would pay for clean electricity and synthesized liquid fuels for everyone.
But it would also bankrupt half of senators, and most of their biggest campaign contributors.
This cannot be found on the Nasa Technology website, nor can it be found on the nasa youtube channel. Can you please post the link in its entirity to the source video. thanks.
Question is what is the bi-product? is it harmful or not?
I still feel that the answer to our energy needs is Hydrogen and not nuclear energy. Between Nuclear, Solar and Hydrogen, it stands out that Hydrogen would be the most logical.
The problem at this time is that it causes more polution to produce than it's worth.
Sounds like that element 115 stuff, what bob Lazar ( not sure if it's spelled like that.) talked about. How UFO is powered by adding neurons which causes a unstable reaction blah blah blah.... U know what I mean^^
@Beamshipcaptain It says in the quran that the earth orbits the sun and the moon orbits the earth along with other moons orbiting tthe sun which clearly states that the earth is not the centre of the universe and not evrey thing orbits earth and back at those days, it was belived that earth was the centre of the universe and evrey thing orbits it.
@onthecuttingedge2005 That's such hypocricy, not when mainstream science holds tenaciously to the 17th century newtonian laws (as it had for the entire 20th and acts JUST LIKE a dogmatic authoritarian religious organization or sect) and DENIES this type of tech could ever exist when it has all along (or at least from NIKOLA TESLA, nearly 100 years ago).
@onthecuttingedge2005 Unfortunately science is controlled by man, hope you know we could have had this at least 40 years ago if it was not for science being used as a tool for suppression, in the right hands science would be great, but it is nothing more than the accumulation of updated information, unfortunately some treat it like a religion.
Actually, engineering makes breakthroughs. Scientists just study the effects/aftermath of our ideas. That's why they make 1/4 as much money.
I was an atheist until about age 15, then I started learning about physics and realized how lacking the opposition of multiverse theory was. Reality does not end where human sensory ends. I think most hardcore physics buffs believe in a deistic God. Mainstream theism is pretty comical though, that I'll admit.
The concept of cold fusion reaction has been around since i think the 80's just no one knows actually how to get it to work in practice, only In theory.
@uriituw Dude, if this shit is for real it's for real, if it's not it's not. It's that simple really; your arbitrary epithets are of little significance.
@andosmate is from nasa.gov .... technologygateway .nasa. gov/media/CC/lenr/lenr.html
Go look up new nuclear physics, like widom larsen..how you can speaks about thermodynamics, is not free energy..is nuclear energy. But clean. Nuclear energy has a density of 10 ^ 6 times more than chemical energy (sorry for my english, i'm from italy)
I remember when Dr Eugene Mallove ex chief science writer for MIT went on the radio and had a long discussion about his work on creating cold fussion devices, also stated he gave a device to MIT to study for 2 weeks, he named some other cold fussion projects government was working on like project "blacklight" who asked for his help, a few hours after the interview he was found murdered. I like his book though "the truth about cold fussion"
NASA still spitting out crap, they're just misleading you away from the truth which is we can harness energy from the cosmos itself. Nikola Tesla would shit on any of these NASA scientist.
Dr Jospeh Zawodmy: "When it comes to the media and reporting, it is a shame when objectivity is lost, principals are abandoned, and all that is left is the ego of the reporter. Reporters should not report only one side of the story, or become judge, jury, and now a censor. These are not the hallmarks of American journalism. Perhaps some of these websites should be publishing under a North Korean domain."
I think this plug of LENR by NASA is a great development, lending credibility to the field in general, while specifically mentioning that excess heat has been generated from Nickel and Hydrogen, which is what several groups are pursuing, including Andrea Rossi and the E-Cat, Defkalion and their Hyperion, Piantelli, Celani, Ahern, and more.
This idea is 20+ years old, all these guys need is funding but governments won't allow it because that would terminate too many jobs and ruin economies
I concur, the big boy's up high will never let this shit slide, & the thing is we all know it, the world know's it. Fuck all will be done about it & in the years to follow it will just be a memory, brushed under the carpet so to speak. We will all sit at home, drink, eat & smile as the world is engulfed by greed/government & we all do nothing. It will never change. They are the rulers of the world & we are puppets that will aways follow them because we will never have the power to do otherwise.
@0043mar Actually, the idea was around before the 1940s. It got some traction in the 1950s, since nuclear fission events were transmuting surrounding elements by the neutron bombardment. But also some interesting work was done on muons. There was a rudimentary theory that protons could give way to a virtual neutron if a muon appears on the proton. So there actually has been several decades of slow progress.
@0043mar SPAWAR's published papers in the past 10 years really gave significant validation to LENR. In my opinion they alone really gave life to the idea, that was blown away by the anti Pons and Flieschman witch hunt of 1989. It has been a slow rebuilding process. But as some say: "A man convinced against his will is of the same opinion still" Harvaard, MIT, Caltech, and all the ivy leaguers who coincidentally had billions for hot fusion threatened by cold fusion are eating crow.
So this is the beginning of free abundent energy!! The end of the giant oil companies, erm wishful thinking! Sure the slow move to a cleaner energy source. But somehow i think the oilys are well aware of this. And the new name for oil is? you guessed it, NICKEL. It has to be mined, and sourced, and who will control the supply?
Another form of this, fuses deuterium: A proton and a neutron, which is abundant in our oceans. This LENR actually is fusion. The products of reaction parallel hot fusion. The energies in Mev are as would be expected in hot fusion. However, this fusion reaction occurs on the molecular level, with atomically vast distances between fusions. The lattice is Palladium. The lattice absorbs most of the energy. The neutrons, Helium, alphas, etc radiate at very low energies. That is the difference
Ok, to bring some clarity for those who are trying to learn about this. Protons derived from Hydrogen are rendered a virtual neutron by what is in effect a heavy electron/muon. These virtual neutrons are fused onto molecules like Nickle. Creating an ultimately unstable isotope. Sometimes the virtual neutron's state collapses, it ejects a muon and becomes a proton, which transmutes the Ni to Cu. The process steadily accreates neutrons which are decaying by one means or the other.
@OAbrey I have seen transmutation in my water fuel cells, do you think what you are saying here could be a similar process to what i am seeing? Also i have a free video on how to increase your fuel mileage with one wire if you are interested.
@jocell202 I have been familiar with this idea since 1982. If LENR's theory turns out to be plausible, I am sure there will be more and more interest in looking at various phenomena. It has been demonstrated that there is a biological process that uses energy from a transmutation. At this point, I don't think the water-car process stands the test. But one day, maybe that is where the Orgone energy is really coming from.
@OAbrey Thanks for the input, its definitely real, watch my save money on fuel with one wire vid, i dont believe in the orgone aspect though, my work shows that there is ormus or ORMES being created in these cells, in other words atoms are being striped down and turned into a form of ormus. Ormus are said to have superconducting properties so perhaps they increase the over all process, you might be interested in my voltage on dry plates video as well.
Tasmania, nice name. But, I don't see the point you're trying to make BHP over here owns both coal mines and oil rigs. And yes they do buy alternative energy blueprints and such.
What are you idiots saying about oil companies snuffing out alternative power inventions? Sure electricity may seem cleaner, but the majority of electricity around the world is produced by coal, one of the dirtiest post-production fuels out there. So using electrically powered transport and appliances is no different to using conventional fuels for cars etc, if not worse. Please get your eco-leftist heads out of your arses.
NIKOLA TESLA ( Serbian inventor) had a car running on electricity 60 years ago, he even said that he can make airplanes run on elec... That explains how much oil companies are hiding great inventions.
And this will be the first and last we'll here of it... there are so many energy sources that are 100% clean and many that are virtually free but every one of them has been brought and hidden by fossil fuel companies (oil, coal etc etc)... they (the criminal establishment) doesn't want us to have it... and won't let us have it.
If you wants to know more on how it is actually working and what is the principle behind. And if you are not satisfied with just red and white ball where just some balls pop into white balls.
then you can view: watch?v=fCFO3-MOCYE
You will realize that there is a much bigger thing going on!!
My God, the amount if people commenting saying this is incorrect or wrong, this information is coming from a head researcher for NASA who most likely has been studying this for years, im sure he knows a lot more than you people, so please, kindly shut the fuck up
@radz150193 no worries those are just the clueless people that have demised this for years, by the way if you would like to approximately double your fuel mileage with one wire installation in your vehicle check out my save money on fuel with one wire vid, if you have an o2 censor you will have to trick the oxygen censor but the experiment its self will prove the validity of it as you will see water dripping out your tail pipe (burnt hydrogen.) and other signs.
bout fucking time. We are living in the 80's when it comes to energy technology. People say we are exponentially advancing in tech but thats not really true. compare 1980 - 2000 and now compare 2000-2012 so far nothing special except smartphones that existed in japan 7 years ago
Religion will never find the answers, only science, first baby steps then learn how to fully run with it, Science will leave religion miles and miles behind. when this happens, religion will begin to die a slow agonizing death.
@onthecuttingedge2005 Andrea Rossi, the inventor of the E-Cat, is a very pious catholic philosopher, he found the solution by trial and error without scientific knowledge.
Just to point out, this is not nuclear fusion. It's nuclear fission via enrichment with neutrons. It's the process used to enriching uranium, it's just they've swapped out the uranium and experimenting with other smaller elements that cannot have a run away nuclear chain reaction. It will need a controlled source of neutrons or else the reaction will die. It's a great and feasible technology that I believe is the best bet for humanity's greed for the spark, but it's not cold fusion.
Money should be completely taken out of the game. Hopefully we now learned that working against each other to just get more money doesn't help quite for anything/anyone/the world/ environment/health, except for the few people who profit from the actual system.
(cont.)Free Energy and the elite of that time wanted it all.Please dont miss understand, I believe cold fusion is possible AND EVEN RUNNING RIGHT NOW. I just KNOW that there is a better way. Nikola Tesla new it and so did Leonardo Da Vinci...! may we ALL wake up before it is too late...
This is all fine , but I wonder if anyone realizes that they have been lying to us for so long that we just accept the first line of bullshit these people dish out when the truth is that we have had FREE energy for over 6000 years.The Ancient pyramids were giant geometrical magnetic resonance generators that used arc reaction for lighting and various other tools. It was destroyed so that the 24 priests of RA could stop the flow of power and obtain complete control for themselves.The world had...
The Patent system is a mess. If ever it can be reformed, one thing that should be disallowed is for someone/somefirm to buy the rights and than bury the patent (i.e., NOT produce it). If that occurred it should revert back to the original owner after say 3 years, with a possibility to appeal and postpone the reversion 1 time for 1 year. Take the Pogue carburetor patents, for example, 100+mpg in 1930's---how much pollution would have been averted.
the pros would be the world would be conservative and using sustainable energy, the cons are that energy companies will be knocked out of the game, which means millions of jobs losses, which means economic meltdowns. I'd rather have a brighter future though than no future.
getwallz 1 week ago
It was not NASA who invented this, it was Andrea Rossi (ecat.com) who first came up with this idea and made prototypes, NASA came along and bought the whole thing for 2milion $. I'm writing this just because people quickly forgetting about the real inventor ;)
naruko17 1 week ago
@naruko17 Amen for your comment. People often think that Gov't has the answer to everything, but it usually the entrepreneur/inventor who drives new changes for society.
fletch92131 5 hours ago
If NASA have truly built a functioning LENR, it will change the world and destroy the fossil fuel industry.
aboothunitedstates 3 weeks ago 2
@aboothunitedstates thats the thing chaos could break no car from now should have t run on gas well earth gas couse this gas comes from moon rock u canlook it up
Sorps3 2 weeks ago
@FreeEnergyTruth that was a great video, i'm building a heat engine which converts waste heat into electricity, may be it could be used alongside this sort of thing. it's a crowd funded project, you'll find it on my channel. Let me know what you think.
DoLpH1983 3 weeks ago
british petroleum made 20 acc and dislikes
freak2310 1 month ago
Thanks
abeldangerdot)net
OttoLund 1 month ago
I'm Hank Hill and I Sell Propane and Propane Accessories and I dislike this video.
andurai876 1 month ago 12
@andurai876 Do you think your job is worth free energy?
adamevoV 3 weeks ago
@andurai876 obama change yeahyah
Sorps3 2 weeks ago
So to hell with the future for everyone, as long as your propane sales are going well that's all that matters. Stop worshipping the dollar - it's going to come crashing down anyway.
FreeEnergyTruth 1 day ago
Can't wait to see this stuff release in 2020 when the gas reserves hit nil. Whose ready to adopt this energy when it's expensive as hell to drive what's left of the defunct gas and oil industries! All together now 1..2..3 GO GREED!!
DocTrundle 1 month ago
Unfortunately the 1st law of the Universe keeps on holding true:
Power_of_money(t) > Power_of_anything_else(t), for any t
The Science is being affected by this law as well. Every field of the Science is being infested with corruption and greediness nowadays. No wonder there hasn't been a groundbreaking discovery since Einstein's Theories. The big corporations drive research at their liking, since they're the ones who fund it. The truth will always be covered and never unveiled.
AlexDrastico380 1 month ago
Forgive me if I misunderstood, but wasn't the process being described at first in this video FISSION, not FUSION?
LouistheHedgehog 1 month ago
@LouistheHedgehog No, but it is a similar process. Fusion works by adding mass to non-radioactive materials till they split on their own. Fission is achieved by splitting radioactive material. At least, that's how I understand it.
ForumFreak 1 month ago
Major oil,gas companies are probably going to suppress these kind of projects until oil and gas are depleted
megaboy1997 1 month ago
@megaboy1997
It has allready been patented and will hit the market this or the next year. Stop talking out of your ass.
Vidyadude 1 month ago
@Vidyadude who patented it? I know Rossi and Focardi wanted to begin making their's available at the end of last year but were only held off by their patent gaining. I find it very stinky that NASA is now making claims of doing this using exactly what the Italian scientists have been doing for the last few years and before they get their patent.
TheNytefall 1 month ago
@TheNytefall
Rossi and Focardi patented it in april last year.
Vidyadude 1 month ago
I'm guessing this hasn't caused waves because it's either not economically viable or doesn't have a great energy return on investment. Probably the former.
Joefrags 1 month ago
Somethings rotten... but it's not in Denmark, search on youtube Cold Fusion by Rossi and Focardi
Notice the difference in dates from the italian scientists announcement and NASA's
TheNytefall 1 month ago
i haven't seen or heard about this nowhere, if this technology never gets into the market because of greedy corporations then i will know for sure that the earth is doomed.
BBMMTR 1 month ago
I can't believe this is no where to be seen in media or has very little attention on the internet. I mean this is probably the greatest invention this century, it will literary change the world.
Vidyadude 1 month ago
These guys should give credit to Adam Widom and Lewis Larsen, who came up with the Widom-Larsen theory to expain this. There's no reference to either of these scientists or to the name of this theory. In academia, this boarders plagiarism.
Baarsian 1 month ago
Deuterium is the most losely bound nuclie. Helium 4 is one of the most tightly bound. The fusion is Really cold ~ 200K; therefore the linear momentum operator is not so strict as in plasma fusion.
CaptainImpedance 1 month ago
Brian Goulet
@CapitainOmega EARTH
Cold Fusion is a reality. d+d-He4+Q check out Fire from water & the war against cold fusion now called LENR(low energy nuclear reactions).
CaptainImpedance 1 month ago
Deuterons are asymmetrical nuclie. A proton bound to a neutron, but the wavefuction is symmetrical isospin 1. They are Bosons. They do not obey the pauli exclusion principle. The de broglie wavelength exceeds the ionic radii of metal solids. The density of hydrogen in metal hydrides is greater than solid Hydrogen. d+d=He4+Q, He4(Ni,?)Cu +/- Q.
CaptainImpedance 1 month ago
@jocell202, I've watched and read up about the war on cold fusion and am beginning to come around. as an engineer, the theories behind it are less important to me than whether the thing actually works or not. If it works, let the physicists come up with a theory later.
It wouldn't surprise me if energy companies are keeping this quiet, the number of patents they own to prevent new energy sources being exploited is shocking. I'll wait to see if this reactor sells but will keep an open mind
maxsteel86 1 month ago 15
@maxsteel86 Awesome, i am not getting your replies in my email box though. Just so you know whats up if i don't reply. Have you seen the "FREE ENERGY Invention Secrecy Still Going Strong" video yet? Some good data. Of course nothing is free but we could have had clean cheep energy many years ago. And if people don't beleave in over unity just mention the splitting of the atom, anyways why wait, watch my save money on fuel with one wire vid and get started tomorrow.
watch?v=edS2aelXi7I
jocell202 1 month ago
@jocell202, ok I might've considered looking at your links but then you claim Pons and Fleishman's experiments as being real. They themselves admitted to lying about the production of fused elements. There was none. They made it up. That much everyone agrees on.
Also your electrolysis video is nothing more than extracting hydrogen. Prove me wrong, drive the car around for a while with the fuel line disconnected and upload a convincing video
maxsteel86 1 month ago
@maxsteel86 Part 2: #2 I should not have to explain this to you but our current science implies that the amount of hydrogen generated from alternator is not enough to improve and produce the millage increase we are seeing, you don't have to be self sustained to prove over unity. By the way I am not getting your replies in my inbox?
jocell202 1 month ago
@maxsteel86 part 1: #1 Pons and Fleishman did not lie nor did they admit to lieing. If you have proof and by proof i man from the horses mouth i would love to see it, for proof it was real and other scientists where replicating it watch the war on cold fusion, proof of the suppression in there as well,
jocell202 1 month ago
@maxsteel86 Ps, and i don't even use the generator, the spark plugs firing ejects electrons, the positive ions in the battery then draw out the freed electrons rendering the ionized molecules to saturate the block and aid in the combustion chamber, transmutation is also a common thing with the joe cells, this suggest the presence of free roaming neutrons.
jocell202 1 month ago
@jocell202, can you honestly tell me you're being objective here or is the promise of a near limitless, clean energy source clouding your judgement? I read the papers on cold fusion back in 2006, the original scientists admitted they made up the bit of detecting new elements after the reaction. No one ever managed to get it to work.
Feel free to take a look at Rossi's demonstration of his working 470kW E-Cat. There were so many things wrong with the setup, its too long to write in one comment
maxsteel86 1 month ago
@maxsteel86 Yes I am being objective here, in fact i have a video called save money on fuel with one wire that you can do yourself to see this is real. Anyone can write and article and say anything. Look at the links on my video where NASA, the US NAVY as well as the US ARMY as well as a positive analysis on cold fusion from the DoD saying this is real, it was real in the 80s when Pons and Fleishman did it and its real now. Also watch the war on cold fusion.
jocell202 1 month ago
We should thank God for providing such wonderful capabilities of science.
JBroMCMXCI 1 month ago
So - in summary: We were right; cold fusion is possible. Overunity is possible (he mentions "excess") and now realize they better start getting the word out before they get caught with their pants down by some backroom scientist like Andrea Rossi.
skal203 1 month ago
If this is true it won't matter because all the environmental marxists won't let it be put to use anyway as they use guilt to control opinion.
beefflavouredbolloks 1 month ago
this just sounds too good to be true
ksw2599 1 month ago
@ksw2599 to good to be true? Lots of people have been trying to tell us this for years, watch the war on cold fusion, and if you would like to save money on fuel watch my save money on fuel with one wire vid.
jocell202 1 month ago
Cant post the link but google "Rossi and his cold fusion E-Cat still smells like a fraud"
You'll find the article. This guy's a scammer. Sorry folks, no cold fusion today
maxsteel86 1 month ago
@maxsteel86 Idiot. watch the war on cold fusion to learn about supression. What is wrong with you people?
jocell202 1 month ago
@maxsteel86 My apologies but it is sooo frustrating trying to give this information free for years and having to deal with you skeptics, knowing full well that every comment you make may detour others from trying it themselves. Knowing you have done no work on the subject and think you know it all, seeing the suppression of this and it goes right over your heads, it is extremely frustrating, no excuse for my outburst though. I just dont even see how people can be so blind in the mind.
jocell202 1 month ago
@twasbrillig33, I know how much people wish this was true but look back at the Perendev Motor scam that happened not long ago. Scientists said no, wishful thinkers said yes. Turns out it was a scam.
Some conspiracy theories I believe but this I dont. Cold fusion proved to be false. Many scientists, unrelated to governments and energy companies tried and proved it wasn't true.
The Perendev motor was also in production. If this was true, dont you think there'd be a bigger deal about it?
maxsteel86 1 month ago
@maxsteel86 I am so sick of idiots that need to have their reality dictated to them by their peers, the worse thing about it is they actually think they are highly intelligent. So did you expect this to be written in the sky with airplanes? Do you expect the controlled presstatuts in the media to cover this? Click on the description box of my save money on fuel with one wire vid to see the links to the DoD, US NAVY and air force for your peer review nonsense.
jocell202 1 month ago
これは凄いニュースだな。ぜひ日本人も知るべきだ。 This is AWESOME NEWS !!!!! Japanese ppl should know this news to remove 54 nuclear power plants.
ThePierreChannel 1 month ago
this video needs more attention
yermommy777 1 month ago
@onthecuttingedge2005
Nicecrispybacon28 1 month ago
What is this, April Fools? Cold fusion was already proven to be a lie way back in the 1990s. If NASA suddenly do have such a breakthrough technology, how comes the first time most people are hearing about it are on a Youtube video? No publications in any peer reviewed scientific journal? And everyone lapping it up without showing any skepticism. That's not a scientific approach, that's just wishful thinking
maxsteel86 1 month ago
@maxsteel86 proven to be a lie (IE WILLFUL SUPPRESSION) by nobody but big energy cabal shills, do some serious research (starting with Tesla) before you make such brainwashed and naive commentate - Look up Andrea Rossi and his E-CAT, it's already in production (PESN dot com). You should be very happy you are WRONG.
twasbrillig33 1 month ago
Thief
Capofudo 1 month ago
Next year thx to italian scientist Andrea Rossi and his team you will be able to buy your own 10kw Ecat home unit. It works with nickel and it will be very cheap
seraphineac 1 month ago
thieves
seraphineac 1 month ago
They are copying the Andrea Rossi ECAT technology
seraphineac 1 month ago
@seraphineac To be fair, Rossi himself claims that his device does not rely on the same theories that NASA is coming up with.
henrikmk 1 month ago
Dammit! i wanted to invent something like that-.- ^^
MrSinisterrR 1 month ago
Too little too late....
bennjanse 1 month ago
Too little detail & theoretical. Put theory into practice before hyping your research please? Thank you.
StopClowningAround 1 month ago
if this really works then what with the Americans?Tesla also was preparing something like that and they hinder him because it would be free to the people.
alkalinetrio751 1 month ago
Who are the people who click "dislike"? Something wrong with clean, abundant energy? Like to be slaves do we?
FreeEnergyTruth 1 month ago 30
@FreeEnergyTruth Its called scientific dogma. watch my save money with one wire vid.
jocell202 1 month ago
@FreeEnergyTruth There's nothing wrong with cold fusion, I think it's fantastic.
The video is just a mess, that's why there are those who click "dislike".
Antipopularization 1 month ago
@FreeEnergyTruth I'm going to be honest with you man, I'm not sure how some videos get dislikes, such as this one, mostly because its an informative video about cold fusion. Maybe they were searching for something else and came across this, and clicked dislike because it was not what they were searching for.
The world will never know.
martyredraven 1 month ago
@martyredraven
It's because alot of people are still very sceptical because Rossi has not revealed how his machine works.
Vidyadude 1 month ago
@FreeEnergyTruth The dislikers would be the shills of those who have something to lose. Oil companies, coal-burning power companies and the governments who get tax revenue from them.
jsiuksta 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@FreeEnergyTruth "Something wrong with clean, abundant energy?"
There's nothing wrong with it if it's real.
But a minority of people believe things based on whether there is real evidence rather than whether they have an emotional need for it to be true. Since no direct evidence is shown, cited or even claimed for the possibility of net energy output with this technique, and it has never been independently reproduced, the tone of the video could be seen as misleading.
ImMichaelTaylor 1 month ago in playlist Uploaded videos
@FreeEnergyTruth " Like to be slaves do we?"
The oppression you allude to is a consequence of human nature, as evidenced by it's existence for all of recorded history, not the result of a particular configuration of technologies.
Abundant energy might make you freer in some superficial material sense (though only slightly unless you live in the third world) but it won't even scratch the surface of the real control that the powerful elites exert over the rest (which targets thought).
ImMichaelTaylor 1 month ago in playlist Uploaded videos
@ImMichaelTaylor
It's not about "superficial material freedom"; it's about not turning our planet into a toxic fucking swamp...
learrus 4 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@learrus You've ignored the context of what we were actually talking about, but anyway, if you want to change the subject lets.
"it's about not turning our planet into a toxic fucking swamp."
Yes, I agree.
We could do that with today's technology. It's not a question of technology, it's a question of making the environment a higher priority than profit. Even if one of these speculative technologies panned out, our current capitalism.gov will still use it to turn our planet into toxic swamp.
ImMichaelTaylor 3 weeks ago
@learrus (continued)
So if you sought to imply that anyone who doesn't agree that this is a real and feasible technology must want the earth to be a toxic swamp, I disagree.
Even if it can be made to produce net energy, it's irrelevant to that question because we already have technology which could do that without utterly despoiling the earth, and we choose not to use it. It isn't covered up, there's no conspiracy, people are just too ignorant and governments are just too corrupt.
ImMichaelTaylor 3 weeks ago
@learrus (continued again)
The whole reason fossil fuel is so popular today is because it's profitable. And it's profitable because it's inefficient and difficult to get.
If one confiscated all of the money in the fossil industry, subsidies and cartel trading profits included, it would pay for clean electricity and synthesized liquid fuels for everyone.
But it would also bankrupt half of senators, and most of their biggest campaign contributors.
ImMichaelTaylor 3 weeks ago
@FreeEnergyTruth Retards click videos they don't want and click dislike because they can.
Some people just wanna watch youtube buurn.
Girbub 1 month ago
This cannot be found on the Nasa Technology website, nor can it be found on the nasa youtube channel. Can you please post the link in its entirity to the source video. thanks.
Question is what is the bi-product? is it harmful or not?
paulie1975 1 month ago
@paulie1975 Here you look to all the information:
dibattiti. wordpress. com/2012/01/15/la-NASA-scende-in-campo-ufficialmente/
(join spaces)
It's a post from an italian blogger che ha raggruppato tutte le informazioni
LivingInATrip 1 month ago
@LivingInATrip *that brought together all the information
LivingInATrip 1 month ago
I still feel that the answer to our energy needs is Hydrogen and not nuclear energy. Between Nuclear, Solar and Hydrogen, it stands out that Hydrogen would be the most logical.
The problem at this time is that it causes more polution to produce than it's worth.
ahomeser 1 month ago
Sounds like that element 115 stuff, what bob Lazar ( not sure if it's spelled like that.) talked about. How UFO is powered by adding neurons which causes a unstable reaction blah blah blah.... U know what I mean^^
MrNathannaruto 1 month ago
MR FUSION! MR FUSION! MR FUSION! Three years buddy- get cracking!
stevecav1138 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
HEY GUYS GO TO MESSINWITHMATES(.)COM AND VOTE FOR THE VIDEO "FART ON THE FACE" PLZZZ!!! AND DO IT ASAP IF YOU CAN THANK YOU!!
mafiamob10 1 month ago
Only science makes breakthroughs, not Religion.
onthecuttingedge2005 1 month ago 31
@onthecuttingedge2005 Thats because when religion has important sufff no scientist aproves it -_-
blackbadmac 1 month ago
@blackbadmac Religion has absolutely no "important stuff". It is all made up non-sense.
Beamshipcaptain 1 month ago
@Beamshipcaptain It says in the quran that the earth orbits the sun and the moon orbits the earth along with other moons orbiting tthe sun which clearly states that the earth is not the centre of the universe and not evrey thing orbits earth and back at those days, it was belived that earth was the centre of the universe and evrey thing orbits it.
blackbadmac 1 month ago
@onthecuttingedge2005 the history of science is the history of spression
jocell202 1 month ago
@onthecuttingedge2005 Wrong...religion has made many break throughs... like 9/11 when Islam broke through the walls of a buildings.
AgrivatedKillah 1 month ago
@onthecuttingedge2005 That's such hypocricy, not when mainstream science holds tenaciously to the 17th century newtonian laws (as it had for the entire 20th and acts JUST LIKE a dogmatic authoritarian religious organization or sect) and DENIES this type of tech could ever exist when it has all along (or at least from NIKOLA TESLA, nearly 100 years ago).
twasbrillig33 1 month ago
@onthecuttingedge2005 Unfortunately science is controlled by man, hope you know we could have had this at least 40 years ago if it was not for science being used as a tool for suppression, in the right hands science would be great, but it is nothing more than the accumulation of updated information, unfortunately some treat it like a religion.
jocell202 1 month ago
Comment removed
RamboRepublican 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@onthecuttingedge2005
Actually, engineering makes breakthroughs. Scientists just study the effects/aftermath of our ideas. That's why they make 1/4 as much money.
I was an atheist until about age 15, then I started learning about physics and realized how lacking the opposition of multiverse theory was. Reality does not end where human sensory ends. I think most hardcore physics buffs believe in a deistic God. Mainstream theism is pretty comical though, that I'll admit.
RamboRepublican 1 month ago
I didn't know Shaquille O'neal narrated for NASA
STDisYum 1 month ago
DOOOOO EEETTTTTT I WAANNNTTTTT
MrYoryka 1 month ago
Another problem: how do they get the carbon, hydrogen or other elements needed(cracking of oil again?)
XDyoroshiku 1 month ago
Oh my god this is so awesome! Go Nasa!
M3IDEH 1 month ago
The concept of cold fusion reaction has been around since i think the 80's just no one knows actually how to get it to work in practice, only In theory.
bscsoundtehc 1 month ago
Good luck marketing it, there will be so many groups out to smeir this thing so it never gets any real publicity
gbrough20 1 month ago
What the hell is 'Free Energy Truth'? Is it a conspiracy channel?
uriituw 1 month ago
@uriituw Dude, if this shit is for real it's for real, if it's not it's not. It's that simple really; your arbitrary epithets are of little significance.
SuperGukke 1 month ago
fake, go look up thermodynamics
andosmate 1 month ago
@andosmate is from nasa.gov .... technologygateway .nasa. gov/media/CC/lenr/lenr.html
Go look up new nuclear physics, like widom larsen..how you can speaks about thermodynamics, is not free energy..is nuclear energy. But clean. Nuclear energy has a density of 10 ^ 6 times more than chemical energy (sorry for my english, i'm from italy)
LivingInATrip 1 month ago
i like cats
SgtMullet 1 month ago
if i have understand is easily explained...They are talking about an E-DOG....facing Rossi's E-CAT ..;)))
hammurabyi 1 month ago
I know theres no scientific standing in perpetual motion but I'd like to know why the planets rotation wouldn't be classed as perpetual motion?
ANTICARBONTAX 1 month ago
@ANTICARBONTAX It's not perpetual it's a billion+ years long orbit decay.
sholmesbrown 1 month ago
@ANTICARBONTAX
Newtons first law.
"An object that is in motion will not change its velocity unless an unbalanced force acts upon it."
There's no negative acceleration because there's very little friction (in a vacuum).
FodderBoi 1 month ago
I remember when Dr Eugene Mallove ex chief science writer for MIT went on the radio and had a long discussion about his work on creating cold fussion devices, also stated he gave a device to MIT to study for 2 weeks, he named some other cold fussion projects government was working on like project "blacklight" who asked for his help, a few hours after the interview he was found murdered. I like his book though "the truth about cold fussion"
ANTICARBONTAX 1 month ago
NASA still spitting out crap, they're just misleading you away from the truth which is we can harness energy from the cosmos itself. Nikola Tesla would shit on any of these NASA scientist.
jezzjizz 1 month ago
Anyone else here think 'The Saint' ? :-)
Ragnaer 1 month ago
LENR Revolution is happening!! Jezz ... it's the most significant revolution (bigger than web) is our life time. Am I dreaming?
samann95014 1 month ago 2
We can only hope. Governments are to invested in oil to let this happen as replacement.
potaka79 1 month ago
Dr Jospeh Zawodmy: "When it comes to the media and reporting, it is a shame when objectivity is lost, principals are abandoned, and all that is left is the ego of the reporter. Reporters should not report only one side of the story, or become judge, jury, and now a censor. These are not the hallmarks of American journalism. Perhaps some of these websites should be publishing under a North Korean domain."
WeedyFlash 1 month ago
My only problem with the e-cat is that the science behind it is so simple and obvious that I'm sure SOMEONE must have come up with it years ago.
TonyBananafy 1 month ago
KILL THE OIL PARASITE AND THE SUCKERS OF SATANS COCK WHO OWN IT
finefilth 1 month ago
I think this plug of LENR by NASA is a great development, lending credibility to the field in general, while specifically mentioning that excess heat has been generated from Nickel and Hydrogen, which is what several groups are pursuing, including Andrea Rossi and the E-Cat, Defkalion and their Hyperion, Piantelli, Celani, Ahern, and more.
SolutionRevolutionS 1 month ago
zero point
andrew09211 1 month ago
AFTER so many years they need to discover that from small spark can start to make energy make
my stuff from my channel check energy 2012!
ZEINSTAIN2011 1 month ago
Transportation is infrastructure!
millionmice 1 month ago
This idea is 20+ years old, all these guys need is funding but governments won't allow it because that would terminate too many jobs and ruin economies
0043mar 1 month ago
I concur, the big boy's up high will never let this shit slide, & the thing is we all know it, the world know's it. Fuck all will be done about it & in the years to follow it will just be a memory, brushed under the carpet so to speak. We will all sit at home, drink, eat & smile as the world is engulfed by greed/government & we all do nothing. It will never change. They are the rulers of the world & we are puppets that will aways follow them because we will never have the power to do otherwise.
gandtstravels 1 month ago
@gandtstravels i noticed that their website is down, things that make you go hmmmm.
jocell202 1 month ago
@0043mar soon the truth, the real truth will hit everybody like a slap in the face.
watch!
andrew09211 1 month ago
@0043mar Actually, the idea was around before the 1940s. It got some traction in the 1950s, since nuclear fission events were transmuting surrounding elements by the neutron bombardment. But also some interesting work was done on muons. There was a rudimentary theory that protons could give way to a virtual neutron if a muon appears on the proton. So there actually has been several decades of slow progress.
OAbrey 1 month ago
Comment removed
OAbrey 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@0043mar SPAWAR's published papers in the past 10 years really gave significant validation to LENR. In my opinion they alone really gave life to the idea, that was blown away by the anti Pons and Flieschman witch hunt of 1989. It has been a slow rebuilding process. But as some say: "A man convinced against his will is of the same opinion still" Harvaard, MIT, Caltech, and all the ivy leaguers who coincidentally had billions for hot fusion threatened by cold fusion are eating crow.
OAbrey 1 month ago
So this is the beginning of free abundent energy!! The end of the giant oil companies, erm wishful thinking! Sure the slow move to a cleaner energy source. But somehow i think the oilys are well aware of this. And the new name for oil is? you guessed it, NICKEL. It has to be mined, and sourced, and who will control the supply?
MyThinkin 1 month ago
@MyThinkin No worries these types of energy can come from water its self. check out my increase your fuel mileage with one wire vid.
jocell202 1 month ago
Another form of this, fuses deuterium: A proton and a neutron, which is abundant in our oceans. This LENR actually is fusion. The products of reaction parallel hot fusion. The energies in Mev are as would be expected in hot fusion. However, this fusion reaction occurs on the molecular level, with atomically vast distances between fusions. The lattice is Palladium. The lattice absorbs most of the energy. The neutrons, Helium, alphas, etc radiate at very low energies. That is the difference
OAbrey 1 month ago
Ok, to bring some clarity for those who are trying to learn about this. Protons derived from Hydrogen are rendered a virtual neutron by what is in effect a heavy electron/muon. These virtual neutrons are fused onto molecules like Nickle. Creating an ultimately unstable isotope. Sometimes the virtual neutron's state collapses, it ejects a muon and becomes a proton, which transmutes the Ni to Cu. The process steadily accreates neutrons which are decaying by one means or the other.
OAbrey 1 month ago
@OAbrey I have seen transmutation in my water fuel cells, do you think what you are saying here could be a similar process to what i am seeing? Also i have a free video on how to increase your fuel mileage with one wire if you are interested.
jocell202 1 month ago
@jocell202 I have been familiar with this idea since 1982. If LENR's theory turns out to be plausible, I am sure there will be more and more interest in looking at various phenomena. It has been demonstrated that there is a biological process that uses energy from a transmutation. At this point, I don't think the water-car process stands the test. But one day, maybe that is where the Orgone energy is really coming from.
OAbrey 1 month ago
@OAbrey Thanks for the input, its definitely real, watch my save money on fuel with one wire vid, i dont believe in the orgone aspect though, my work shows that there is ormus or ORMES being created in these cells, in other words atoms are being striped down and turned into a form of ormus. Ormus are said to have superconducting properties so perhaps they increase the over all process, you might be interested in my voltage on dry plates video as well.
jocell202 1 month ago
It's about time!! We need the fossil fuel empires to die so that we can live.
JamesF63 1 month ago
This will be the further good by greedy people from the Oil company's
Logoontwerp 1 month ago
Tasmania, nice name. But, I don't see the point you're trying to make BHP over here owns both coal mines and oil rigs. And yes they do buy alternative energy blueprints and such.
NomadsFilms 1 month ago
What are you idiots saying about oil companies snuffing out alternative power inventions? Sure electricity may seem cleaner, but the majority of electricity around the world is produced by coal, one of the dirtiest post-production fuels out there. So using electrically powered transport and appliances is no different to using conventional fuels for cars etc, if not worse. Please get your eco-leftist heads out of your arses.
TasmaniaIsAHole 1 month ago
This and hydrogen power - clean as. Now someone should actually start implementing them on a global scale.
weasel5166 1 month ago
NIKOLA TESLA ( Serbian inventor) had a car running on electricity 60 years ago, he even said that he can make airplanes run on elec... That explains how much oil companies are hiding great inventions.
TheProVideo007 1 month ago
And this will be the first and last we'll here of it... there are so many energy sources that are 100% clean and many that are virtually free but every one of them has been brought and hidden by fossil fuel companies (oil, coal etc etc)... they (the criminal establishment) doesn't want us to have it... and won't let us have it.
Sad but true.
lockie1976 1 month ago
If you wants to know more on how it is actually working and what is the principle behind. And if you are not satisfied with just red and white ball where just some balls pop into white balls.
then you can view: watch?v=fCFO3-MOCYE
You will realize that there is a much bigger thing going on!!
pinkybrain6 1 month ago
My God, the amount if people commenting saying this is incorrect or wrong, this information is coming from a head researcher for NASA who most likely has been studying this for years, im sure he knows a lot more than you people, so please, kindly shut the fuck up
radz150193 1 month ago 34
@radz150193 no worries those are just the clueless people that have demised this for years, by the way if you would like to approximately double your fuel mileage with one wire installation in your vehicle check out my save money on fuel with one wire vid, if you have an o2 censor you will have to trick the oxygen censor but the experiment its self will prove the validity of it as you will see water dripping out your tail pipe (burnt hydrogen.) and other signs.
jocell202 1 month ago
@radz150193 - The Appeal to Authority is a logical fallacy. But it would be nice if it was true.
JBofBrisbane 1 month ago
bout fucking time. We are living in the 80's when it comes to energy technology. People say we are exponentially advancing in tech but thats not really true. compare 1980 - 2000 and now compare 2000-2012 so far nothing special except smartphones that existed in japan 7 years ago
thericate 1 month ago
this looks like a load of crap I don't believe it
WeedyFlash 1 month ago
@WeedyFlash . Your mum looks like a load of crap. I don't believe her. No go plonk your head in the sand.
mykebulvai 1 month ago
That's not cold fusion. In fact it's not fusion at all.
huwrj 1 month ago
Religion will never find the answers, only science, first baby steps then learn how to fully run with it, Science will leave religion miles and miles behind. when this happens, religion will begin to die a slow agonizing death.
onthecuttingedge2005 1 month ago
@onthecuttingedge2005 . there's always some sucker bringing up religion in a scientific video. Jesus H.
mykebulvai 1 month ago
@onthecuttingedge2005 Andrea Rossi, the inventor of the E-Cat, is a very pious catholic philosopher, he found the solution by trial and error without scientific knowledge.
If you assume, you make an ass out of u and me.
MisterAriLeon 1 month ago
wait how much power is the neutron enrichment going to consume ?
This isn't showing fusion it's showing fission
you can have piratical feasible fission with stable elements without emitting radiation ?
unamaxify 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
please subscribe to my page people and show me love im a young rapper from Melbourne Australia on the come up, #Donttrip
prothegreat 1 month ago
Just to point out, this is not nuclear fusion. It's nuclear fission via enrichment with neutrons. It's the process used to enriching uranium, it's just they've swapped out the uranium and experimenting with other smaller elements that cannot have a run away nuclear chain reaction. It will need a controlled source of neutrons or else the reaction will die. It's a great and feasible technology that I believe is the best bet for humanity's greed for the spark, but it's not cold fusion.
Zappyguy111 1 month ago
About time some of these black-ops technologies start seeing the light of day!
terra2100 1 month ago
the music reminds me of Halo...
27kdon 1 month ago
Meanwhile the guy at 0:17 has 2 CRT monitors! LOL
CTV911 1 month ago
@CTV911
Saves money when they need a quick and easy particle accelerator
Zappyguy111 1 month ago
lol are we supposed to think this is new? Watch my one wire experament to save money on fuel.
jocell202 1 month ago
btw , you still think those "alien" ships can't exist ?
koneye 1 month ago
BLASPHEMY , this is impossible , give us more money to spend on CERN and hot fusion
koneye 1 month ago
Potential game changer if true.
celnuk 1 month ago
please also visit:
peswiki. com/ index.php /Main_Page -> remove whitespaces
they are kind of inspired by Nikola Tesla and have been publishing
on Rossi's technology literally for "forever", as far as i can tell
pinkybrain6 1 month ago
Comment removed
Pergie3000 1 month ago
Money should be completely taken out of the game. Hopefully we now learned that working against each other to just get more money doesn't help quite for anything/anyone/the world/ environment/health, except for the few people who profit from the actual system.
pinkybrain6 1 month ago 2
(cont.)Free Energy and the elite of that time wanted it all.Please dont miss understand, I believe cold fusion is possible AND EVEN RUNNING RIGHT NOW. I just KNOW that there is a better way. Nikola Tesla new it and so did Leonardo Da Vinci...! may we ALL wake up before it is too late...
TheWisdomwalker 1 month ago
This is all fine , but I wonder if anyone realizes that they have been lying to us for so long that we just accept the first line of bullshit these people dish out when the truth is that we have had FREE energy for over 6000 years.The Ancient pyramids were giant geometrical magnetic resonance generators that used arc reaction for lighting and various other tools. It was destroyed so that the 24 priests of RA could stop the flow of power and obtain complete control for themselves.The world had...
TheWisdomwalker 1 month ago
I'm in shock....I never thought they would actually confirm this. I can't wait to get one for myself.
thegravelesssoul 1 month ago
The Patent system is a mess. If ever it can be reformed, one thing that should be disallowed is for someone/somefirm to buy the rights and than bury the patent (i.e., NOT produce it). If that occurred it should revert back to the original owner after say 3 years, with a possibility to appeal and postpone the reversion 1 time for 1 year. Take the Pogue carburetor patents, for example, 100+mpg in 1930's---how much pollution would have been averted.
zuvrick 1 month ago