Added: 3 years ago
From: bryr74
Views: 2,216
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (40)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Notice that even in a piece calling out Obama, the media has to tip toe over the subject like walking on eggshells, this is what u get when u put hope and faith in a politician

  • It's Bush's fault!

  • good god

  • yeah, like ANY politician is capable of telling the truth.

  • You ppl expect every promise to be met?

  • Marakulous43: Um, yeah, that's kind of the whole point of a promise...

  • you ppl think supporting your own opressor is intelligent?

  • If McCain had that much money to run ads, it would have been even more Bill Ayers, Socialism, Reverend Wright, etc.

    He already had Fox News doing it and it didn't work.

    At least Obama laid out his plan to fix the country rather than "DID YOU KNOW JOHN MCCAIN IS FRIENDS WITH G. GORDON LIDDY?"

  • So -o-o-o ....... your point IS??????

  • If the McCain campaign had more money, they would have wasted it.

  • FOR ALL YOU PEOPLE WHO JUST CAME OUT OF A COMA,

    Having more money than your opponent will land you more TV Commercials, but if your message isn't convincing, or you come across as clueless and out of touch, you'll end up like John McCain and Sarah Palin. LOSERS!

  • Yes!! Obama did messages that simple minded people like, and could understand.....things like "change" and "hope"..... please keep it real, thats all his message was.....which is an empty one. Early in the primaries Obama was my favorate, but when then I soon realised that Hillary had more of a message than him, and most people voted for him because of his race, I don't like saying it, but thats the harsh truth and I call things by how I see them.

  • satanicpoohbear ,

    Your contradicting words disregard all principles of logic. YOU SAID,

    "most people voted for him (meaning Obama) because of his race"

    I SAY,

    Maybe you should contact the Guiness Book of World Records and let them know that YOU'VE personally met most people.

    That's one for the record books I'll say!

  • Haha, funny joke. Anyways, don't use the word contradict like that (do you know what contradict means?), it was improperly used. Thanks for ignoring my other responses too, I see you just respond with childish humor when losing =]. If you want facts though, blacks voted for Obama over McCain about 9 to 1, but you can disregard that since they usually vote Democrat. Against Hillary though they voted for Obama about 8 to 2, I am done stating my case. This is not counting whites with white guilt.

  • satanicpoohbear,

    Again,

    Maybe you should contact the Guiness Book of World Records and let them know that YOU'VE personally met most people.

  • These are statisics smart one. Tell me where in my sentence did I say I met these people. Please quote like you usually do!

  • LMAO I still can't get over how you used the word contradict like that! Do you know what that mean means? Tell me, how did I contradict myself?

  • Oh, this is nothing... wait 'til you see how Obama does as the prez!  He's a con artist with keys to the world. We thought Clinton scammed us, Obama will make Billy Boy look like an amateur!

  • This news report is sooooo lame.

    Didn't McCain say he'll run a clean Campaign? Look at what happened!

    He went dirty and lost!

    Ha, Haaaaaaa!

  • I'm glad Barack Obama changed his mind about public financing and accepted my $2,834.00 Cashiers Check to use towards his campaign effort. I think it was well spent! He's got my vote and I hope he wins!

    EAT THAT!

  • So you have now confessed that you have broken the law....

    As an individual is only allowed to donate $2300 to an individual candidate per election.

    Good job ace.....

    EAT THAT

  • bryr74,

    Thanks, by the way, how's the "crow" ?

  • bryr74,

    Your words, "I am not eating crow"

    LOL!

    I know, you're eating "Raven".

  • Pretty easy to win an election when you raise more money than any 2 candidates in history....

    Money illegally given - at least partially by people like yourself.

  • bryr74,

    "Pretty easy to win an election when you raise more money than any 2 candidates in history....

    Money illegally given - at least partially by people like yourself"

    NEWS FLASH!

    Money doesn't win elections, people do!

    You can have all the money in the world, but of voters aren't convinced, or lack trust, you're doomed!

  • If you think that money isn't important with elections, i'll question your intelligence. If he didn't get as much money as he did Hillary would have gotten the nomination.

  • satanicpoohbear,

    Your hilarious words,

    "If you think that money isn't important with elections, i'll question your intelligence. If he didn't get as much money as he did Hillary would have gotten the nomination. "

    I say to you,

    NEWS FLASH!

    More people voted for Obama because they feel he's the best choice for President, not because he raised more money. Duuuuhhhh!

  • Well you sound pretty dumb now... you can be the best candidate in the world, but if you don't have the money to advertise and spread your message you will make it nowhere. Obama outspent Hillary and McCain on ads, he even had his little special the week before the election (how much do you think that costed?). This is simple marketing, it also goes for the business world. If you can't understand my point you're an idiot. I'll finish why it caused him to defeat Hillary in the next comment too.

  • The reason why Obama defeated Hillary is because during the primaries she ran short on money and had to reduce her campaigning in many states (and proof by her campaign debt if you want to argue) while Obama still had plenty of money to campaign beyond her, she came back after Pennsylvania and won the majority of the primaries past there, but by then it was too late and the superdelegates pushed him over the number. So

    "NEWS FLASH!"

    You don't know what you are talking about. Duuuuuhhhhh!

  • FOR ALL YOU PEOPLE WHO JUST CAME OUT OF A COMA,

    Having more money than your opponent will land you more TV Commercials, but if your message isn't convincing, or you come across as clueless and out of touch, you'll end up like John McCain and Sarah Palin. LOSERS!

  • Uh oh...... I think we have an Obama bot here!! He's probably programmed to say the same dumb things over and over. Well, you make the statement "Having more money than your opponent will land you more TV Commercials, but if your message isn't convincing, or you come across as clueless and out of touch" please back up with facts =], btw nice copying and pasting, I replied to this message earlier Obama bot nitwit.

  • satanicpoohbear,

    I can copy and paste my own words as much as I wish. It's not my fault you have no logical defense as to why you canidate lost.

    Go back to the "Peanut Gallery" where you came from!

  • Lmao you are not even debating anymore, you are clearly going off topic because you are losing. This was not even an argument about who won or lost, this was an arguement on Obama raising money. Stop trying to change the subject and name calling like a child, doing so is a sign of fear. As I can see you haven been argueing with people here for months, but you are saying nothing intelligent just name calling. Face it Solowizard you are in denial of some truths about Obama.

  • satanicpoohbear,

    NEWS FLASH!

    I don't debate, but lay the Factsdown with the Smackdown!

    Of course this isn't an argument about who won, or lost. WE KNOW WHO WON! Hell, The whole world knows who won.

    The point is that people like you are nothing but sore losers. All you people do is wallow in recycled old shit.

  • Haha, cute "Factsdown with the Smackdown!" You haven't really said much facts if any, and thats what I grilled you on, you just say childish things like "Maybe you should contact the Guiness Book of World Records.......That's one for the record books I'll say!" or "you'll end up like John McCain and Sarah Palin. LOSERS! " Middle school humor? and btw I told you this is not an on who won "This was not even an argument about who won or lost, this was an arguement on Obama raising money." Nice try!

  • satanicpoohbear,

    Yeah, just be sure not to emulate me when making comments to someone else. People like you tend to talk shit and then turn around and emulate the very same people you claim to despise. It never fails, but then again, they say immitation is the highest form of flattery. No surprised there, see it all the time.

  • @Solowizard you should had gave that to needing people/Kids. I think you would had felt better doing that. peace to all

  • Under the circumstances of Fox News 24-7 bias--including the dishonest exclusion of Republican Ron Paul from the New Hampshire debates---there is no unfairness in resources between the Obama and McCain campaigns.

    Obama's huge support primarily comes from small donors.

    In terms of the fundamental honesty in how he represents himself--Obama has called himself pro-little guy, and indeed his AFL-CIO voting record is 95%. McCain does the same, but his labor record is 17%.

  • Fox is biased.... LOL

    OK - CNN has been the homebase for liberals for decades. You cannot tell me that Fox News is making things biased for the whole nation.

    The media as a whole is completely biased and it is towards OBAMA and his socialist, marxist ways.

  • And there may not have been one particular smear campaign that reached the notoriety of the "swift boat" campaign against John Kerry, but in fact, there have been plenty of smears, and new ones are coming out all the time.

    In fact, Glenn Beck, who uncritically *dramatized* and aired the totally false Michelle Obama Waldorf-Astoria smear on his radio program, is a CNN host--there is no Democratic counterweight to Fox News.

  • Hmmm, I always been extremely moderate and like to look at both sides, so I watch both Fox and CNN. The one that really gets under my skin is MSNBC, specifically 6-9pm central time I believe, I can't even watch it. And yes both Fox and CNN have a clear bias, and I don't think its possible to have 100% unbias. MSNBC does not even have a token Republican from those times, while Fox (used to until recently) and CNN at least had something.

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more