Drawing Gravity & Space-time?

[dankoga2]

hum... Actually yout drawing is really inaccurate. Try to picture this: to draw a 1D space (a line) deformation, you must drag it into a second dimension; to draw a 2D space (a surface), you must drag it to a third dimension. So, if you will try drawing a 3D space distortion, you'd have to drag it into a fouth dimension, which is quite dificult do represent!

[eah2119]

interesting

[Alarindris]

Sometimes I have a hard time dealing with how completely retarded the average person is.

[agongtsang]

I can understand gravity. But if space-time has to be taken. It must be one at a time. If all the space-times come at one. Which space-time should we take as a parameter?

[ZebraErlbeck]

not bad... :)

[romeopathe]

Time is a human concept unless you believe in extra terrestrial life and they do also happen to know what time it is, other wise just like the three in the forest falling,when we human are instinct does time keep going?So if the answer is yes well time was already there before the big-bang big-bang...We could adjust ourself with E.T. standard time but who can tell me the universal time? Like our gravity could be residue from a Universe next door then could time be only residuel or more timely?

[xMrT612x]

duh it would create the circle because you could put an infinant amount of "gravity lines" and a circle has infinant amount direction. so couldn't you take the 2D image of what he was doing and add more gravity lines and start turniing it around him. so what im saying is you would be looking at an object from 2 sides at the same time thus bending space time, creating maybe a worm hole bending time. time travel maybe?

[StrumstickJoe]

Time is motion; motion is energy; energy is universal and connects everything in a way I havent quite figured out yet but I will. Gravity, magnetism, electricity and the nature of atoms (all subjects to do with this connection) are the focus of speculation by eminent theologians, scientists and mathematicians who are mostly

[MagicAndYuGiOhDude]

Awsome!

[nickharvey7]

Nice!

You done a good job It looked like a 3D curvature to me. Could it be that Time has symmetry and geometry? Newton believed Time was a thing in itself and connected to motion and Einstein believed there was something missing from quantum mechanics. In my video The Paradox of Schrodingers Cat an artist view it is Time that is the Hidden Variable.

[tropickman]

What would have helped in the illustration of the video would have been a rotation of the drawing on its "X" axis.

[tropickman]

One may illustrate gravity by taking a large and flimsy piece of paper. Extend the paper horizontally, parallel to the ground, and hold it out with your arms. Then take a spherical object (an apple), small in relation to the paper plane, and place it on the middle of the paper. You will notice that the plane has curved, influenced by the mass of the apple. If you now put a smaller sphere on the same paper plane, it will be influenced by the curvature of the paper (space-time).

[migmob27]

Ugh I hate watching this video, it reminds me of my 3605 Vector Formulate class, I just passed with a C in it. Guys, if you are picking a major for college, do NOT pick any research major, your life WILL be spent in a library I can assure you of that.

[grozmo1]

should have researched it before you chose to do it XD

[gamer1o0]

gravity force is straight . its the earth shape (curved) not gravity .simple .but if 2 forces are within the same area then object can go curve or which direction where force is strong and making an illusion of curved gravity or space. for example

if big asteroid going in straight line in our solar system gravity of planets will surely bend its direction if planet or sun gravity is strong for it.

i am not 100 % accurate but this is what i am able to understand about gravity space bending

[ShootBigBird]

Most think gravity is about the bending and curving wrong.

Some think gravity is about mass causing negative divergence wrong again

Very few think its about the consumption of energy density in the continuum almost there

Almost nobody asks the obvious, why is mass consuming energy, what is it doing? nail on the head type of question

Biggest question is, what could be so important as to such spacetime in?

[FSXgta]

lol i almost got sucked into the screen of the gravity

[Leszek1024]

Try to imagine it in 4D or 10D!

[A1HitterQuitter]

If you archive visualizing the 4th dimension you can think of this easily.

ITS NOT A 1 DAY THING TO TRULY VISUALIZE THE 4TH DIMENSION!

[MattChez]

surely this should be titled as gravity curving around a stationary and spherical object??

the central image only ends up as circular because you started off with a circular shape.

fair enough most matter in space eventually becomes spherical,, but for this vid you should state the shape and density of the object,

[housemandoc23]

BLACK HOLE ZOMGBBQ'D!

[a1chrisp]

~Can you grasp light/sound? not physically cuz it is not matter.

~Does light/sound have a gravitational pull? No cuz it is not matter and therefore does not have any mass.

~Can light be heard? No that is why there is sound.

~Does matter truly exist?if matter did not exist then we wouldn't

~Is light/sound a product of matter? [Already ansrd]

~Can time be eliminated? Time is an invention of the mind.

~Can time be felt as if it were matter?[Ansrd]

Hope this helps ur curiosity=]

[a1chrisp]

"~Is light/sound a product of matter? [Already ansrd]"

i have thought about this one and the first time reading it i did not see PRODUCT clearly, so my revised answer is:

Yes, Light and sound come from matter, they exist because matter does

[theImaginarySolution]

The most used example of trying to picture gravity is a heavy ball on a trampoline. But in reality would it be a better model to put a ball in a tank of water instead? However when we do this "space" is not curved. It's displaced.

Weird stuff...

[DingXiaoPing]

You're right, space is not curved, It's displaced. But why?, answer is easy!

[ShootBigBird]

DingXiaoPing (space is not curved, It's displaced. But why?, answer is easy!)

Holy Cow, how on earth is it easy?

[ShootBigBird]

theImaginarySolution (put a ball in a tank of water instead? However when we do this "space" is not curved. It's displaced)

Its not really displaced, its consumed. Research Gauss and negative divergence.

[Netino78]

i was just waiting for the xbox logo to show up lol

[newguy531211]

you just drew a simple circle...with a green sphere inside nothing special...

[Balphaus]

Watch. Me. Care

[Nova314159]

lol. well put.

Also, the video was interesting. It's hard for me to imagine 3 dimensional space curving, so this kind of helped.

[bravoncho]

gratz that made me kind of awarness thank u

[trinity31338]

By the way, I loved this video.

[TheReasonWhyGuy]

I've always preferred the 3d grid.

[Markb25266]

what will be when question stop to be?

[zloben9000]

we dont need to imagine it in 3d ...

the question is why do objects attract eachother ... and einstein never explained that .. NEVER !

[Seneka4295]

Maybe the LHC will help shine some light on that question. Who knows?

[ChristianDavis629]

I hope so...

[ShootBigBird]

zloben9000 (einstein never explained that .. NEVER !)

Correct, in fact nobody has, ever!

[CyberneticWarrior]

*shrill screams*

Thank You. X]

[trinity31338]

your grammar and spelling is atrocious, Etimespace. I think I know what you're trying to say. It doesn't make sense.

[mtheoryrules]

A potential to beget a varity of possibilities, where as time as a dimension, remains consistent to its particular segratated universe. At least this is consistent as a discription of liner time with regards to our subjective perception in terms that assume that string theory is an accurate discription of reality.

Why? what did you have in mind?

For I do so love to debate.

[alphathr33]

Trip-py! I like that. Yep. Time....it's not linear.

[mtheoryrules]

what do you mean time is not linear?

[blowery2]

Time is not a dimension that is independent from space. The two are connected, which means that space and time affect one another. Special relativity and all that.

[mtheoryrules]

That is general relativity.

[chopperhead2011]

No, it's called the fabric of SPACE-TIME, they don't have their own "fabrics," do they? You can tell someone to meet you at your house. A place in space. But you're missing WHEN, you need the TIME, too.

[mtheoryrules]

actualy yes they do, time is consitent and smooth as a fabric, where as space at the most finite levels can not be considered as such.That is to say that at finite levels space has a potential, where as time remains consistent as a dimension that in regards to the structure of our universe, if we assume that the many worlds interperataion is correct in the context of string theory, then it is reasonable to say that they have seperate structures.

In so much that finite spacial dimensions have

[mtheoryrules]

Not really, I think it may be that you believe that the time has a structure that is discribable in terms that are empirical and not abstract, if this is the case I will suggest that you reread general relativity.

Time is only aplicable as an abstract concept "relative" to a different observer and only an "ideal" observer would be able to form a normative discription of the fabric of time. This is at present impossible for a human to do, well at least in emperical terms.

[mtheoryrules]

You see time as a normative us different from space in that two different observers are not always expected experience the same dimensional events.

Where as in terms of strictly finite spacial potentialalities there exists an observation bases for the normative observations.

It might be true that one can not seperate space from time empericaly but it is does not hold true that one can not do so abstractly in regards to conceptual constructs.

But we would be debating philososphy not science.

[mtheoryrules]

Hence the overlap and the existence of counter intuitive but valid concepts such as relativistic time travel, frame draging, and worm holes.

Also we oberve paradoxical consequences that delve into the realm of philosophy that such theories establish.

I am not sure of the exactly name for them but one example is that being that relativity does not exclude time travel (relativistic time travel not time reversal the differnce must be stated) there exist percieved paradoxical circumstances.

[accelarion]

pyu drew a black hole

[DancingSpiderman]

Sphincter, by Spirograph.

[VilleB123]

objects fall through the curved spacetime path of least resistance (geodesic)

[amarnamriju]

i had read this book in astronomy class and it tried to touch on general relativity and the curvature of space and that whole deal.

i never thought i'd ever be able to visualize or pictorially grasp that concept but this is the first time i think i've made progress in that direction.

pretty nice mood of the music too...

nice vid

[troponinnutrition]

Just tell your professor that the space is still there, gravity has just pulled it into the extra dimensions positioned at every point in space-time.

Space-time isn't curved, gravity just yanked chunks of it into extra dimensions.

[frederic470]

inspiring

[Jameswynne1]

I like the ending. It really makes you think

[liqidearth]

thanks every one for being concerned about this very important key to unlock the powers of the universe

[dd628]

Watch 'Einstein Revealed'on you tube...he tells you that at the speed of light you'd only see one still picture - forever... i dont know about going faster than it though.

[Chromebaby]

A good attempt at creating a more accurate representation for space time being curved by an object. The 'marble on a rubber sheet' visualizaion is a mixed metophor! 2D mixed with 3D. Annoys me every time I see it.

[dizzo95]

Q; Does the Red Shift of Cosmic Light , prove the Earth is at the center of the Universe ?

A; Yes , if Motion started on Earth then the Earth would be at the center of the Universe .

It is possible Human Beings created particles that traveled back in space-time to start motion in a motionless gravity vacuum field even 60 Billion Years ago.

Q: Would that mean Human Beings are baby gods ?

A: Yes, Human Beings are baby gods and most likely create baby universes.

[SnowConeStudios]

hey, "dizzo95" ur completely wrong about whatever ur tryin to explain. Earth COULD be at the center of the universe, considering that everything is moving away from our galaxy. however, if you go to another galaxy, you would assume the same thing because everything, including the milky way, is moving away from you. it all depends on your frame of reference, which is the basis of relativity. so no matter where you are, ur at the center of the universe.

[splatuality]

Its all down to the observer .What the observer is! and what it is referenced to.Ultimately there can be only one observer observing itself.We are all diffferent points of one consciousness experiencining our self independantly and as a whole .

[cubikman]

it would easyer to see if you a three deminsional screen. A srceen with not only the x axises and y axises but also a z axises.

It gets realy hard to display on a flat sreen when you have more variables x,y,z,u,v,w.I know i'v tryed lol

[8arsh]

Oscillating braids and weaved ropes... right?

[GunsNRosesbitches]

The comment below was a response to Themaskedpenguin87

[scepter66]

Hi. very nicely done. i have considered the same thoughts myself while trying to visualise a gravitational field in 3-d. sometimes it is very difficult to imaagine because i try to visualise gravity waves extending from the sphere , not just the 2-d grid. the intersecting waves make a very interesting and beautiful form, especially in 3-d.

[den2003]

Nice job! Up 'till now, I've only seen the "rubber / trampoline" X/Y space with a Z gravity well. Your drawing takes this tired representation and "spins it around", making the gravity well appear denser closer to the body all over. Nice one. This reminds me of how Hollywood depicts blackholes...like giant 2D whirlpools. They never show the event horizon as a spheroid (with jets) and that you can fall into it from any direction.

[Themaskedpenguin87]

what is the song

[Themaskedpenguin87]

see that is what is confusing, if the sun sinks into space fabric what is pulling it down into it?? i thought there was no up and down in space

[GunsNRosesbitches]

No, you got it wrong. The sun has a mass. Anything with a mass warps spacetime. It doesn't fall into anything, the spacetime fabric gets dented (warped) when there's a heavy object. Like put a tennis ball to a spider web, the spider web gets dented. If u didn't have a tennis ball on the spider web, the web isn't dented, it's str8. But the existence of something with a mass causes the dent. Same thing with heavy objects and spacetime. The heavier the object the greater the warp in spacetime.

[silverblue73]

Stop wasting my spacetime!

[Forlo12345]

lol, i like this video. It cleared up a lot of confusion.

[JorgeZoltan]

whoa...

[Allinamix]

wow.... this is great... i like it

[jpadgettexhc2]

i WOULD LOVE TO SPEAK WITH YOU ON THIS SUBJECT. I AM A PHYSIC/STRING THEORIST IN TACOMA WASHINGTON. THIS YEAR I WILL BE RELEASING SEVERAL NEW EQUATIONS THAT DESCRIBE WHERE ENERGY COMES FROM. I HAVE HUNDREDS OF 'DRAWING' AND DIAGRAMS OF GRAVITY AND YOU ARE DRAWING THEM IN A VERY SIMILAR FASHION.

[Balphaus]

Really? That's amazing.. Personal message me if you like.

[FushioRichie]

wowo you "stole" my idea from gravity sight, i meant i had this vison of gravity and others similars efects but i never draw it before. well done dude, keep doing things like this, ill give u 5/5 or more

[Balphaus]

Cheers man :)

Sorry to steal. :P

[bluntsalot]

im not hating on the video, but time and space are not a linear line. if time and space were a straight line then how could they be infinite. time is not finite. if time and space are a straight line then there is destinations.how can there be destinations on a road that goes forever.

[PermanentDaylight]

i tried to find a 3d representation of spacetime curving, but couldn't. the only "3d" i found is in the book the elegant universe by brian greene. but it doesn't show much.

[Balphaus]

Check out my other video then. The reply to this, it sort-of explains why it's impossible...

[Balphaus]

Heh. I don't get it. How can I be a liar? This is just my artistic impression of the effects ccording to my understanding of things. The accuracy was achieved by copying and pasting the same bend(s) in every direction.

[seeget]

Although this does look kinda like what one might imagine, the diagram itself is dense in the center because of the large number of intersections between dipping lines, not so much because it depicts the phenomenon accurately. So what I'm saying is that the diagram is good thanks to its own flaw.

But let me be the first to admit I'm no expert on the matter.

[Balphaus]

That was partly my point. "despite the illusion of 3d curvature - this is still only a 2d model" It's an interesting effect and all and it points toward the problem.. If a 2d model exhibits a 3d effect then in 3 spatial dimensions it'd end up "4d" which we cannot comprehend - so we'd see either a) a nonsensical mess or b) nothing.. Watch the follow-up video if you haven't already. Thanks for commenting.

[Balphaus]

Yeah I understand what you mean. That's why I propose that people "try" and imagine it in "full 3D".

[Balphaus]

Haha brilliant! I'm assuming there were no mistakes either considering you didn't point any out :)I'm glad you approve.