Just when I thought their discussion about stumbling onto a revelation would be the best thing I had watched all day; the Yorkshire TV logo pops up at the end :')
Whenever I watch a Feynman interview I always feel like I want to send my brain back to the factory and tell them, "this damn thing doesn't work. I want a new one".
just watching him so passionately talk about the importance of deep understanding in every fields gives me motivation and reminds me of the following:
"Below the surface of familiarity, there is a wonderful unknown world to be discovered"
Feyman and his contemporaries where at the sweet spot in regards to their science. The exitement that they must have felt served as a slingshot into ever more greater discoveries. Try being a painter in 2011 after Warholl said art was dead 40 years ago. How many mind blowing developements in painting have there been since? Should I be bitter that I was born a painter? Later I chose to spend my life speculating on the unknown. Why? Feynman's exitement is what discovery feels like. It's fun.
I think Feynman feels how I do. As long as whatever the mans chosen endeavor/endeavors in life is and works hard to always make continual progress committed to excellence till the day he dies that is where he can grow with excitement instantly just talking with that person. Exchanging idea's and learning of each others field, hobby, trade etc. It's exciting because like Feynman he challenges even his own thoughts. Only to get to the right answer! That's how I get at least.
He says NO with such enthusiasm but then you can see him stumbling all the way up to "i take it all back" at which point the enthusiasm is rekindled never to let up again.
As Sir Thomas More wrote in 1516 many years before his execution by the king of England, and which I'll sumerise, pride is the greatest sin and the greatest obsticle to our collective enjoyment of the world.
@acr08807 Sir Tohmas Aquinas was not really a saint, and it is a joke that the Catholik church recognized him as such. Yes, at that time woman where being burned at the stake, but rarely in England, mostly in the Germanic states. STA tried to be as modern as he could be , but realised at 1 point that his standards and the brutality of power politics was incompatible. In the end he chose his idealizations over reality. In this way he was a saint to ALL men.
@sadcracker I meant Sir thomas More, maybee he is related somehow to St.Thomas Aquinas. But thats a whole other story isn't it? What is interesting is that the word Utopia translates into latin as somthing comical actually. Tom More actually made an attempt to not be taken too seriosly. But if you are not an expert in latin this subtlety would go unoticed. But in regards to the great late medieval humanists, more often than not Rome has tried to take credit for their brilliance posthumously.
@sadcracker I think you're confusing Thomas Aquinas and Thomas More. More had six "heretics" burned at the stake during his term as Chancellor of England. Outside that, he wasn't such a bad guy.
@acr08807 I'm affraid that I am usually drinking when I post to Utube. I did catch my mistake. I admit that More did try to "work whithin the system", which was brutal in the late middle ages. As he grew older he realised that it was futile. He picked a place to draw the line, fully knowing what the cosequences would be. Whithin his value system, he fully accepted the price of his failed experiment and the sins he commited in order to fully engratiate himself with the powers that be.
@sadcracker I hear you re the alcohol. It definitely improves the level of commenting on youtube. As for Moore, no doubt he was a product of his time, and did what he thought was right. It makes one wonder, though, since he's still considered a saint by the Catholic church, why doesn't God have a problem with that kind of brutality?
@acr08807 Is that sarcasm, or commraderie? I noticed you capitalised the word God. That usually indicates a move away from abstract speculation into the realm of belief systems. I think that would draw us us away from the spirit of discourse that Feynman is commending. (my spelling is bad regardless of alchohol) Plz remember that the Catholic church when it was founded, was in no way representative of a consensus between Christian sects at that time. Hell btw, was strictly a Roman invention.
@sadcracker I capitalize King Lear, too; that doesn't mean I believe he existed. The concept of Hell goes back to way before there were Romans, but I agree, the Catholic church does not represent all Christianity.
@acr08807 Usually, when Hell was represented in early western mythos, it did not serve as the ONLY alternative to heaven. I.E.: It was not part of a stick and carrot system of compelling obediance as it did throughout the dark and middle ages in Europe. For example, Hades, was not a place you could avoid by being
obediant to Grecco-Roman ideology. As far as I know, Hell as a place of punishment w/o chance of repreive, was a new concept up till that time. Any objection?
@sadcracker You make some great points. The ancient Greeks had the concept of Tartarus, a place within Hades dedicated to punishing of those judged unworthy, but that's not from long before there were Romans as far as I know. The cult of Osiris, which flourished around 1700 BC, had a heaven and a place where the unrighteous would be sent for torture and annihilation, though there the torment was not eternal.
The moment at which he says "I take it all back" is one of the most outstanding intellectual moments I've ever seen. The moment that it dawns on him that he had been getting tunnel vision, he renounces it gladly and with no shame, and articulates a greater truth instead. This is the kind of mind to which we should all aspire... If we as a culture could recant without shame, think how better a society we could make...
" This is the kind of mind to which we should all aspire... If we as a culture could recant without shame, think how better a society we could make..."
Says you. Spoken like a naive first worlder.
Society will never change.
Just because you worship Feynman, I and the rest of the third world population couldn't care less about physics or your idealist delusions. We're just trying to survive.
@Romansteel13 >Implying anything other than technology will help 3rd world countries with their over population, poor standards of living lack of clean water and food.
Be thankful someone isn't just praying and is actually DOING.
"will help 3rd world countries with their over population, poor standards of living lack of clean water and food.
Be thankful someone isn't just praying and is actually DOING."
ROFL.
Blame the ignorant population, instead of the geopolitical exploiters who come to my country and rape the land. You sir deserve an award for being a moron.
@Romansteel13 What country are you from? I can't discus "geopolitical exploiters" vs your corrupt government if I don't know where you're from. I'm actually giving you the benefit of the doubt that you aren't some poor troll and are indeed from a 3rd world country but have a computer with internet.
"Your countries not doing too bad if you have an internet connection I seem to remember only 30% of the world having an internet connection."
Wrong. My country is in the bottom 10% of GDP. Just because the metropolitan areas have internet does not mean 90% of my country does. I'm not going to spell it out for you, my illiterate friend. You gotta do your homework instead of spewing BS. By the way I speak 3 languages, how about you?
"are indeed from a 3rd world country but have a computer with internet."
There are internet cafes all over the world, are you aware of this fact?
Even in Bulgaria, piracy capital of the world, where the average citizen makes 250 USD per month, have internet. God Green day wrote a song about you.
@morrowindfan75 Again making incorrect assumptions STATISTICALLY 30% of the world have access to the internet being in the top 30% of the world with a privileged access to the internet makes it hard for me to believe he is truly personally living on the poverty line. Maybe he is I'm asking where he's from and he's dodging because he probably is a troll and you jump straight to his defence.
"STATISTICALLY 30% of the world have access to the internet being in the top 30% of the world with a privileged access to the internet makes it hard for me to believe he is truly personally living on the poverty line."
Statistically, I find it hard to believe that your "statistics" are accurate, you make shit up. You're from GB, you're in no position to judge third worlders, neither am I. I sympathize with 3rd worlders, while you sit on your fat ass in Manchester eating fish + chips.
@morrowindfan75 wwwDOTinternetworldstatsDOTcom/statsDOThtm Look at the penetration specifically in areas considered 3rd world including Asia and Africa 23.8% of Asians have access to the internet even less in Africa where only 11% have it which is probably mostly the richer areas like cape town. They are both below the world average for penetration. I can only assume that you are the same person on another account because you're acting just as irrational. Making more baseless assumptions.
@ronocko At what point did I judge 3rd world people? you're assuming the guy below is genuinely from a 3rd world country and not a troll, you're assuming I'm fat and don't aid 3rd world countries, If you're not the same guy I was previously talking to you really need get some reading comprehension because what I said is that technology is the only thing helping 3rd world countries creating drought resistant crops full of essential nutrients and vitamins to vaccines for their children etc..
@morrowindfan75 You're back tracking now when did I say I thought I knew everything about the world and what does it matter if I'm 20 and living Britain? Who said I donate money how do you know I don't volunteer my time? I don't see what you think you have to prove and this conversation is going no where fast.
there were once two great philosophers who's reputations preceded them. when they met they were so in awe at what the other had to say that they both sat in silence. it was in this silence that they both came to understand everything.
I think the only reason Hoyle and Feynman were friends is because Feynman loved to talk and Hoyle loved to listen. As much as I love Feynman, I can see him getting on the nerves of his collegues due to his unending passion to think and communicate. Something I admire.
@3balloonedcourier I suggest you get a rewards program with either Borders or Amazon and buy "The Feynman Lectures on Physics" at some discounted percent. As a neuroscience student with a long passion for science, I find that classes often dilute the wonder of the mysterious with manufactured and canned material, it is in self-motivated discovery that the world regains its true beauty that is so often dulled by the blandness of class. To be fair though, I also find my classes to be a great guide
"I take it all back." Has anyone here ever heard this when debating with someone or pressing them on a point? When was the last time you heard someone concede a point in an argument instead of just trying to play semantics or move on to a different argument without admitting having been wrong.
Feynman's intellectual honesty and unwillingness to cheat anyone out of the truth is really inspiring.
@NoRegret0 I agree totally. Every argument I get into always ends in either the opposing person getting angry and refusing to concede their point or I find myself tired of trying simply give up. I always find myself conceding to a well thought out point but I rarely find anyone conceding one to me. If iam technically or morally in the right the other person tends to hate the thought that they might be in the wrong and will vehemently defend their honor. A shame because a good argument is great!
The legendary figure Feynman typifies is ironically why so many have a need to believe the soul continues on. Even I'll admit it's depressing to think that Feynman will miss the opportunity to experience all the wondrous epiphanies scientific enquiry has yet in store.
@554466551 Couldn't the same be said of any man? A working science man, even those during some of the most scientifically crucial points in time when the most amazing discoveries yet are being made, will die long before some of the things they fought their entire lives to understand are finally discovered. Feynman fell victim to this fate, as will I and all other men. It's about the progress you make while you can, and he helped us make progress immensely. I believe he could have been satisfied.
@554466551 Than again, many people would argue that scientists are never satisfied, so it's understandable that one would feel depressed about his inability to experience the wonders we have yet to reveal.
Not only did Feynman feel no negativity, bruise or regret when he realized he had to 'take it all back' -- he was elated that he'd found the better answer! THAT'S the true joy of discovery which attracts great scientists.
You know, that moment of inspiration when you feel like screaming 'Eureka!' is a very similar pleasure to ... well, you know. And I don't even want a cigarette afterwards.
me and my friends all talk about this stuff all the time. its interesting what you can come up with when you just throw ideas around instead of gossip or unnecessary things
@0oRouseticalo0 So true and you are one lucky person to have a friend to throw ideas around with because it seems that I cannot find one and I would really really like one.
The best thing about Feynman was that after elaborating on something for 4 minutes he could still say "You know what? I take it all back". Never afraid to be wrong.
To me, this is the most inspirational statement in this interview. He spent that entire clip defending his point, and without hesitation he changed his mind when he realized he was wrong. That is a true scientist. Would that more of us cared for what is true, as Feynman did.
You are so right. As a matter of fact, I don't think I know anyone in person who would prefer watching Mr. Feynman to stupid shows and the mainstream crap that air on TV.. and that makes me feel so alone and so sad.
Hey don't compare Palin and Leno at the same level. Palin has no brain cells. Leno is a comedian of highest claiber. Feynman is a true physicist who can make people think about conventional wisdom which is 99% borrowed blindly with no logic/rationality.
About why such material is (sadly) seldom on commercial TV:
"If it doesn't get ratings, its off. Look, if I came up with the cure for cancer and it didn't get ratings, they wouldn't put it on. That's how vicious that business is."
Feynman had a beautiful mind -- what is bothering me though ( as he would say) is what he says at 8:09 in this vid, I can't make out the words ---- the sentence is --- "......was that f you did a work a little bit at these things, there would be a time ************* " I just can't work it out -- any ideas -- I think he had a cold on this vid ;O --
@TheRamblingBoy I think he said "...my father said...that if you work hard at these things, there would be a time when they get easier..." - a nice thought, but sadly not always true
I watch the video many times. Feynman is probably not the best physicist, but is by far the best in teaching physics and showing how to think about the world as a scientist should do. Although there could be debate about scientific method and many epistemology questions, his general view towards knowledge and discovery is always of great value.
around 6:15, they talk of the nature of discovery, the moment of epiphany if you will. i love this part of the talk as it provides such an honest moment of connection between the two gentlemen. it occurs to me that there is a symbiosis of ideas in certain mystic philosophy that they do not discuss (at least not yet, i'm only at 7:01), the notion of interest without attachment. (reminds me of the open source mvmnt) thanks so much for posting these interview videos. peace
That discussion - at the end - between Hoyle and Feynman put a massive smile on my face :)) I would luv 2 go down the pub with those 2 - despite the fact that I'd feel like an idiot in comparison.
This is the type of individual our culture ought to be celebrating and granting prominence instead of rank cretins like Palin and Leno and the whole herd of showbiz personalities.
could you imagine what an amazing world this would be if everyone demanded things like this for their television instead of that mindless drivel that is pumped through 24/7? I wouldn't want to meet a person who didn't think this was amazing!!!
@fctchk i guess the reason this doesn't happen is because they're rare individuals in the first place. they don't have mass appeal. most people wouldn't be able to relate to him or even understand what he is saying.
@crowbs90 Of course, but the whole point is that he could if only the framework of our society were somehow different. I mean, in the 60's (or maybe more like the 70's response to the 60's), it was cool to be "cool". We aspired, as a culture, to learn and grow, but there's been a retrenchment where it's become cooler to push things aside and go for the quick and easy. I mean, that aspect of American culture was always there, too (in the form of advertising). Only more recently, that's won out.
@sex6cult9revolution not society. genes. most ppl too stupid to appreciate. even if there was a counter culture movement similar to the 60s where people redefined what was "cool" so that this was included, there'd just be a lot of fakers pretending to appreciate it when they really just hearing a heap of big sciency words.
as much as i'd like philosophers to replace politicians and artists to replace hack pop songwriters, there just aren't enough people who appreciate philosophy and good art.
@fctchk Ahh, you fail to understand the basic premise of supply & demand. Intellectual demand is exceeding low in the world; therefore, the supply is limited. Great minds are out there, but not many can or are willing to listen. I realized this when wondering why very few 'good' movies are made (ones that make you THINK)...same principle.
@myrtlebox I'll admit that's true. However, at the risk of sounding Marxist, it is also an example of how the relentless quest of personal wealth can prove a detriment to the greater knowledge of mankind. At the least, science literacy in the public.
I offer the above as confirmation of my own hypothesis -- It's not the drunk geek who can't communicate, it's the sober non-geek who can't comprehend.
@thejugglenaut91 What does being a Nobel Prize winning physicist have anything to do about it? I said Him and I have similar thought processes...not identical brains. There's a difference but apparently you can't comprehend it. Don't be rude to people.
i'm just saying, it literally takes a genius to have thought processes like his because it is precisely those thought processes that makes him so smart and esteemed.
@nilbud Oh really? Why the hell would I not have posted that? Do you think like me? No you don't, so stop making dimwitted accusations. What makes it impossible for me to think like Feynman? Just because I share similar thought processes doesn't mean I'm a fucking theoretical physicist. Your logic is both flawed AND wrong. Shut up and go home
@LochlanachViking But imagine if the average man decided Science was suddenly hip? He would corrupt and eviscerate Science. Hence the Discovery Channel, hence the modern Science channel. Popularity corrupts.
@Mattprole Sad, but true. (Proper) Education is still needed. What I mean is the education given must provide context and meaning for the pupil, or else they will lose interest. Imagine if they would play this stuff on television once again!
hell, I was almost anti-intellectual for a time until I found richard Feynman. Then I basically dropped everything, and ordered every physics and calculus book ever. Then I majored in physics haha. Unfortunately, the american education system doesn't realize that that is how science has been propagated for millenia: inspiration. They act as if they are just churning out science machines. Just think how many brilliant scientists that could be if it wasn't for our school system.
? thats up to you man. The property of science, is, to be scientific.mIf your not, your performing pseudo science. Some are, unknowingly, and do give proper science a bad rep. But, its up to us, to keep to the straight road, and do our double blind controls, and so on and so on...
Look how excited he gets when he begins his speech at 1:50, especially from 5:04 - 5:27. THAT is what science should be: a way of fusing the imagination and passion of art with the seriousness and sternness of logic and analysis.
Well isn't that characteristic of the scientific method? I mean Feynman was just an evolved primate.
For all we know there could be beings/aliens/gods/whatever that are far beyond us in intelligence and understanding of reality. In fact it is highly probable.
Oh come on.... I was joking about the way the interviewer speaks. & Feynman is just expressing himself. I can't wait until I've learned physics to talk the way he is using concepts so developed as opposed to speculation.
But why do people get so anal retentive about such trivial comments?
Anal retentiveness follows from people who reference evolution like you have :(
You've taken a Dawkins book too far, stating the obvious to put someone down is never a smart thing to do...
After reading your youtube page I assume you were looking to "provoke" me as you assume I am a "moron" (from your hobbies on ur youtube home page).
Sorry, I wont indulge you in your newfound joyful activity aimed at supplementing the hole that remains now that you've worn out the soles of your party boots ;)
My belief (or lack thereof) in evolution is a personal thing that I don't disclose to just anybody...
Hope you enjoyed what Feymnan & Hoyle had to say anyway...
Feynman was not in the same league as Einstein and Dirac. They invented new theories of matter itself - all Feynman really did was show how to get numbers from a bad theory (QED). He himself regarded his inability to come up with a valid quantum theory of fields (without "dippy math" as he called it) to be a great failure. His honesty about this is one of his best features.
And so the arbiter of Thought went far on the road of truth, having slain Doubt, Pride, and the forms of Desire, only to stand atop the Cliff of Sanity peering down into the ocean of thoughts. To swim is beautiful. To plunge deep in the ocean is mad, and potentially maddening; for it is at the great depths of the ocean that one faces Insanity, the keeper of truths. Only those that can resist the awe of truths that Insanity possesses can escape Insanity's presence with truth that was sought after
In Men, there are qualities that distinguish the two-legged stock from the Reasonable stock, but how Men identify themselves is completely relative. In a situation where a Man of the two-legged stock thinks that he's Reasonable, how Reasonable is it for a Reasonable Man to try and convince the Man of the two-legged stock otherwise, when it is He of the two-legged stock that 'Thinks' that He is Reasonable, and his mind is made up?
Just when I thought their discussion about stumbling onto a revelation would be the best thing I had watched all day; the Yorkshire TV logo pops up at the end :')
GrandSupremeDaddyo 3 weeks ago
A great watch ... Thanks again!
bradduke 3 weeks ago
thanks, helpful.
delerium2k 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
ass hole upload the whole thing or upload nothing at all. scum bag, piece of shit mother fucker.
Xytos 2 months ago
@Xytos The rest of the video is uploaded, but you don't deserve to watch it.
ublade82 2 months ago 5
@Xytos he did idiot
Quand9 3 weeks ago
Comment removed
Callirgos1 4 months ago
Whenever I watch a Feynman interview I always feel like I want to send my brain back to the factory and tell them, "this damn thing doesn't work. I want a new one".
deedubya286 4 months ago 5
just watching him so passionately talk about the importance of deep understanding in every fields gives me motivation and reminds me of the following:
"Below the surface of familiarity, there is a wonderful unknown world to be discovered"
mjantube 5 months ago
I get chills when I listen to him.
gxgfree4rhyme 5 months ago
I love how he exposes Hoyle for being such a speculator.
illumined1 5 months ago 2
Feynman said it all when he said good man are the ones with nothing left but mystery and awe for it.
egodrive 6 months ago
謝謝
jimmylovesyouall 6 months ago
@jimmylovesyouall You are welcome, very welcome.
BlameRepublicans 5 months ago
Feyman and his contemporaries where at the sweet spot in regards to their science. The exitement that they must have felt served as a slingshot into ever more greater discoveries. Try being a painter in 2011 after Warholl said art was dead 40 years ago. How many mind blowing developements in painting have there been since? Should I be bitter that I was born a painter? Later I chose to spend my life speculating on the unknown. Why? Feynman's exitement is what discovery feels like. It's fun.
sadcracker 7 months ago
Well Holye was pretty wrong on quasars.
Prometheus4096 7 months ago
I think Feynman feels how I do. As long as whatever the mans chosen endeavor/endeavors in life is and works hard to always make continual progress committed to excellence till the day he dies that is where he can grow with excitement instantly just talking with that person. Exchanging idea's and learning of each others field, hobby, trade etc. It's exciting because like Feynman he challenges even his own thoughts. Only to get to the right answer! That's how I get at least.
DigitalBeast6 7 months ago
Juding only from youtube videos and wikipedia, Feynman looks like a very happy, curious and alltogether interesting person.
mike18at 7 months ago
He says NO with such enthusiasm but then you can see him stumbling all the way up to "i take it all back" at which point the enthusiasm is rekindled never to let up again.
UnrecycleRubdish 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
"[...]because you read scientific magazines--presumably--and hear the scientific gossip[...]"
*facepalm*
SeraphSnake 9 months ago 4
Comment removed
SeraphSnake 9 months ago
Comment removed
SeraphSnake 9 months ago
Comment removed
mjoltedal 9 months ago
"he did whatever he did as far as he can go" (=passion) thats the people i want to meet too
LucBertolotti 10 months ago 3
wow my brain is overloaded^^
Kalas90 10 months ago
Who the f*** would dislike this?
shadowfoam 10 months ago
As Sir Thomas More wrote in 1516 many years before his execution by the king of England, and which I'll sumerise, pride is the greatest sin and the greatest obsticle to our collective enjoyment of the world.
sadcracker 10 months ago 2
@sadcracker Pretty ironic coming from a guy who burned others alive at the stake for disagreeing with his religious views.
acr08807 9 months ago
@acr08807 Sir Tohmas Aquinas was not really a saint, and it is a joke that the Catholik church recognized him as such. Yes, at that time woman where being burned at the stake, but rarely in England, mostly in the Germanic states. STA tried to be as modern as he could be , but realised at 1 point that his standards and the brutality of power politics was incompatible. In the end he chose his idealizations over reality. In this way he was a saint to ALL men.
sadcracker 8 months ago
@sadcracker I meant Sir thomas More, maybee he is related somehow to St.Thomas Aquinas. But thats a whole other story isn't it? What is interesting is that the word Utopia translates into latin as somthing comical actually. Tom More actually made an attempt to not be taken too seriosly. But if you are not an expert in latin this subtlety would go unoticed. But in regards to the great late medieval humanists, more often than not Rome has tried to take credit for their brilliance posthumously.
sadcracker 8 months ago
@sadcracker I think you're confusing Thomas Aquinas and Thomas More. More had six "heretics" burned at the stake during his term as Chancellor of England. Outside that, he wasn't such a bad guy.
acr08807 8 months ago
@acr08807 I'm affraid that I am usually drinking when I post to Utube. I did catch my mistake. I admit that More did try to "work whithin the system", which was brutal in the late middle ages. As he grew older he realised that it was futile. He picked a place to draw the line, fully knowing what the cosequences would be. Whithin his value system, he fully accepted the price of his failed experiment and the sins he commited in order to fully engratiate himself with the powers that be.
sadcracker 8 months ago
@sadcracker I hear you re the alcohol. It definitely improves the level of commenting on youtube. As for Moore, no doubt he was a product of his time, and did what he thought was right. It makes one wonder, though, since he's still considered a saint by the Catholic church, why doesn't God have a problem with that kind of brutality?
acr08807 8 months ago
@acr08807 Is that sarcasm, or commraderie? I noticed you capitalised the word God. That usually indicates a move away from abstract speculation into the realm of belief systems. I think that would draw us us away from the spirit of discourse that Feynman is commending. (my spelling is bad regardless of alchohol) Plz remember that the Catholic church when it was founded, was in no way representative of a consensus between Christian sects at that time. Hell btw, was strictly a Roman invention.
sadcracker 8 months ago
@sadcracker I capitalize King Lear, too; that doesn't mean I believe he existed. The concept of Hell goes back to way before there were Romans, but I agree, the Catholic church does not represent all Christianity.
acr08807 8 months ago
@acr08807 Usually, when Hell was represented in early western mythos, it did not serve as the ONLY alternative to heaven. I.E.: It was not part of a stick and carrot system of compelling obediance as it did throughout the dark and middle ages in Europe. For example, Hades, was not a place you could avoid by being
obediant to Grecco-Roman ideology. As far as I know, Hell as a place of punishment w/o chance of repreive, was a new concept up till that time. Any objection?
sadcracker 7 months ago
@sadcracker You make some great points. The ancient Greeks had the concept of Tartarus, a place within Hades dedicated to punishing of those judged unworthy, but that's not from long before there were Romans as far as I know. The cult of Osiris, which flourished around 1700 BC, had a heaven and a place where the unrighteous would be sent for torture and annihilation, though there the torment was not eternal.
acr08807 7 months ago
The moment at which he says "I take it all back" is one of the most outstanding intellectual moments I've ever seen. The moment that it dawns on him that he had been getting tunnel vision, he renounces it gladly and with no shame, and articulates a greater truth instead. This is the kind of mind to which we should all aspire... If we as a culture could recant without shame, think how better a society we could make...
Epistemofo 10 months ago 66
@Epistemofo
" This is the kind of mind to which we should all aspire... If we as a culture could recant without shame, think how better a society we could make..."
Says you. Spoken like a naive first worlder.
Society will never change.
Just because you worship Feynman, I and the rest of the third world population couldn't care less about physics or your idealist delusions. We're just trying to survive.
Romansteel13 3 weeks ago
@Romansteel13 Whilst you reply to a youtube video on your computer. Third world my ass.
matthewjsharpe 3 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@matthewjsharpe
" Whilst you reply to a youtube video on your computer. Third world my ass."
Yes because only Americans have computers! Nice logic, bro.
morrowindfan75 3 weeks ago
@Romansteel13 >Implying anything other than technology will help 3rd world countries with their over population, poor standards of living lack of clean water and food.
Be thankful someone isn't just praying and is actually DOING.
ronocko 1 week ago
@ronocko
"will help 3rd world countries with their over population, poor standards of living lack of clean water and food.
Be thankful someone isn't just praying and is actually DOING."
ROFL.
Blame the ignorant population, instead of the geopolitical exploiters who come to my country and rape the land. You sir deserve an award for being a moron.
Romansteel13 1 week ago
@Romansteel13 What country are you from? I can't discus "geopolitical exploiters" vs your corrupt government if I don't know where you're from. I'm actually giving you the benefit of the doubt that you aren't some poor troll and are indeed from a 3rd world country but have a computer with internet.
ronocko 1 week ago
@ronocko
"are indeed from a 3rd world country but have a computer with internet."
Yes because internet is a first world commodity.
Fucking American moron, thinking the world consists of America.
And you wonder why the rest of the world hates you and your people?
Romansteel13 1 week ago
@Romansteel13 Not american, Try again.
Your countries not doing too bad if you have an internet connection I seem to remember only 30% of the world having an internet connection.
ronocko 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@ronocko
"Your countries not doing too bad if you have an internet connection I seem to remember only 30% of the world having an internet connection."
Wrong. My country is in the bottom 10% of GDP. Just because the metropolitan areas have internet does not mean 90% of my country does. I'm not going to spell it out for you, my illiterate friend. You gotta do your homework instead of spewing BS. By the way I speak 3 languages, how about you?
Romansteel13 1 week ago
@ronocko
"are indeed from a 3rd world country but have a computer with internet."
There are internet cafes all over the world, are you aware of this fact?
Even in Bulgaria, piracy capital of the world, where the average citizen makes 250 USD per month, have internet. God Green day wrote a song about you.
morrowindfan75 1 week ago
@morrowindfan75 Again making incorrect assumptions STATISTICALLY 30% of the world have access to the internet being in the top 30% of the world with a privileged access to the internet makes it hard for me to believe he is truly personally living on the poverty line. Maybe he is I'm asking where he's from and he's dodging because he probably is a troll and you jump straight to his defence.
ronocko 1 week ago
@ronocko
"STATISTICALLY 30% of the world have access to the internet being in the top 30% of the world with a privileged access to the internet makes it hard for me to believe he is truly personally living on the poverty line."
Statistically, I find it hard to believe that your "statistics" are accurate, you make shit up. You're from GB, you're in no position to judge third worlders, neither am I. I sympathize with 3rd worlders, while you sit on your fat ass in Manchester eating fish + chips.
morrowindfan75 1 week ago
@morrowindfan75 wwwDOTinternetworldstatsDOTcom/statsDOThtm Look at the penetration specifically in areas considered 3rd world including Asia and Africa 23.8% of Asians have access to the internet even less in Africa where only 11% have it which is probably mostly the richer areas like cape town. They are both below the world average for penetration. I can only assume that you are the same person on another account because you're acting just as irrational. Making more baseless assumptions.
ronocko 1 week ago
@ronocko At what point did I judge 3rd world people? you're assuming the guy below is genuinely from a 3rd world country and not a troll, you're assuming I'm fat and don't aid 3rd world countries, If you're not the same guy I was previously talking to you really need get some reading comprehension because what I said is that technology is the only thing helping 3rd world countries creating drought resistant crops full of essential nutrients and vitamins to vaccines for their children etc..
ronocko 1 week ago
@ronocko
"you're assuming I'm fat and don't aid 3rd world countries"
But you don't.
Money is not support.
People give money to third worlders so they can write it off in their tax returns, not because it's the right thing to do.
You are 20 years old, living in GB, thinking you know everything about the world, yet you know nothing.
morrowindfan75 1 week ago
@morrowindfan75 You're back tracking now when did I say I thought I knew everything about the world and what does it matter if I'm 20 and living Britain? Who said I donate money how do you know I don't volunteer my time? I don't see what you think you have to prove and this conversation is going no where fast.
ronocko 1 week ago
amazing individual
scuzzulus 11 months ago 2
I hardly have any "eureka" moment since I was 15...sigh.
dawncoming 1 year ago
@dawncoming
Take up programming.
UbiquitousChe 1 year ago
This was a really good interview this man was really intriguing
thebest852 1 year ago
Ha wish i could drink pints with Feynman
PICLex 1 year ago 3
That was an absolute joy to watch! Thank you
bigeddielad 1 year ago 9
brilliance
check out the pleasure of finding things out
it's also very good
rhymists1 1 year ago 2
brilliance
check out the pleasure of finding things out
it's also very good
rhymists1 1 year ago
5:05 best piece of video I ever saw...
Cinqmil 1 year ago 2
there were once two great philosophers who's reputations preceded them. when they met they were so in awe at what the other had to say that they both sat in silence. it was in this silence that they both came to understand everything.
RRRRussia 1 year ago 4
I think the only reason Hoyle and Feynman were friends is because Feynman loved to talk and Hoyle loved to listen. As much as I love Feynman, I can see him getting on the nerves of his collegues due to his unending passion to think and communicate. Something I admire.
Ajihood 1 year ago
@Ajihood yea the other guy could hardly get a word in
uberfishy1pker 1 year ago
"we don't have to have magazines or gossip. we think originally. we think of a new idea."
tparker37 1 year ago 4
Fascinating!!!
kabravardan 1 year ago 2
haha he gone mad at 2:58..
okaymckay 1 year ago
Every day could be physics day, vote yes for physics.
Lucuskane 1 year ago 2
His enthusiasm is infectious.
I know very little of physics,however,I now feel as though I should.
3balloonedcourier 1 year ago 8
@3balloonedcourier I suggest you get a rewards program with either Borders or Amazon and buy "The Feynman Lectures on Physics" at some discounted percent. As a neuroscience student with a long passion for science, I find that classes often dilute the wonder of the mysterious with manufactured and canned material, it is in self-motivated discovery that the world regains its true beauty that is so often dulled by the blandness of class. To be fair though, I also find my classes to be a great guide
jedinerd111 1 year ago
"I take it all back." Has anyone here ever heard this when debating with someone or pressing them on a point? When was the last time you heard someone concede a point in an argument instead of just trying to play semantics or move on to a different argument without admitting having been wrong.
Feynman's intellectual honesty and unwillingness to cheat anyone out of the truth is really inspiring.
NoRegret0 1 year ago 33
@NoRegret0 I agree totally. Every argument I get into always ends in either the opposing person getting angry and refusing to concede their point or I find myself tired of trying simply give up. I always find myself conceding to a well thought out point but I rarely find anyone conceding one to me. If iam technically or morally in the right the other person tends to hate the thought that they might be in the wrong and will vehemently defend their honor. A shame because a good argument is great!
dustimus1 1 year ago
@NoRegret0
Lol, I always admit when I'm wrong in an argument. People find it weird! You don't really get the respect you should for doing so.
chebob2009 1 year ago 3
thumbs if you typed view 4 view :D
SecurityAssassin 1 year ago
The legendary figure Feynman typifies is ironically why so many have a need to believe the soul continues on. Even I'll admit it's depressing to think that Feynman will miss the opportunity to experience all the wondrous epiphanies scientific enquiry has yet in store.
554466551 1 year ago 2
@554466551 Couldn't the same be said of any man? A working science man, even those during some of the most scientifically crucial points in time when the most amazing discoveries yet are being made, will die long before some of the things they fought their entire lives to understand are finally discovered. Feynman fell victim to this fate, as will I and all other men. It's about the progress you make while you can, and he helped us make progress immensely. I believe he could have been satisfied.
MegaBlackDays 1 year ago
@554466551 Than again, many people would argue that scientists are never satisfied, so it's understandable that one would feel depressed about his inability to experience the wonders we have yet to reveal.
MegaBlackDays 1 year ago
He took it as far as he could co, up against mysteries all the way around the edges, as far as he could go.
May many others join him, going as far as they can go.
<3
DynamismJR 1 year ago 2
This was amazing. Thank you for uploading this.
Taisch 1 year ago 3
the passion for truth, how admirable of a man..
jaaaaacki 1 year ago 3
Feynman is just the mutts nuts.
ThePhotonicsGuy 1 year ago 2
แรงบันดาลใจของผมเลย นักวิทยาศาสตร์คนนี้
phuthaikudwa 1 year ago
watched all 4 parts. amazing!
thanks for uploading dude!
rajithaify 1 year ago 2
thanks for uploading this! I'm glued to my monitor watching this...
brianjsnead 1 year ago
Magazines...... Dick loved that one LOL!
gweflj 1 year ago 3
I wish I could have sat oppposite in that bar day after day listening to these 2 men talk.
shagster1970 1 year ago
Not only did Feynman feel no negativity, bruise or regret when he realized he had to 'take it all back' -- he was elated that he'd found the better answer! THAT'S the true joy of discovery which attracts great scientists.
You know, that moment of inspiration when you feel like screaming 'Eureka!' is a very similar pleasure to ... well, you know. And I don't even want a cigarette afterwards.
OrganCat 1 year ago 108
@OrganCat
Know exactly what you mean. Also, the "I take it all back!" moment was when I actually started positively admiring the man.
..I think I might actually want a cigarette now.
leckerwurstbrot 1 year ago 2
at 2:40 makes so much sense dont be a clone and dont believe the hype that you read in some magazine be original
djrakman 1 year ago
me and my friends all talk about this stuff all the time. its interesting what you can come up with when you just throw ideas around instead of gossip or unnecessary things
0oRouseticalo0 1 year ago
@0oRouseticalo0 So true and you are one lucky person to have a friend to throw ideas around with because it seems that I cannot find one and I would really really like one.
thebest852 1 year ago
The best thing about Feynman was that after elaborating on something for 4 minutes he could still say "You know what? I take it all back". Never afraid to be wrong.
jimbopumbapigsticks 1 year ago 15
"I take it all back."
To me, this is the most inspirational statement in this interview. He spent that entire clip defending his point, and without hesitation he changed his mind when he realized he was wrong. That is a true scientist. Would that more of us cared for what is true, as Feynman did.
gratuitousARPNet 1 year ago 47
What Feynman has reached to is the result when someone discovers his/her passion and they follow it
hjk3569 1 year ago
Thanks so much for uploading this!
Androly 1 year ago
the way feynman probes any matter is amazing. quite original
trk0 1 year ago
@thejugglenaut91
You are so right. As a matter of fact, I don't think I know anyone in person who would prefer watching Mr. Feynman to stupid shows and the mainstream crap that air on TV.. and that makes me feel so alone and so sad.
d3st88 1 year ago 4
Hey don't compare Palin and Leno at the same level. Palin has no brain cells. Leno is a comedian of highest claiber. Feynman is a true physicist who can make people think about conventional wisdom which is 99% borrowed blindly with no logic/rationality.
vaidehiraghavan 1 year ago
About why such material is (sadly) seldom on commercial TV:
"If it doesn't get ratings, its off. Look, if I came up with the cure for cancer and it didn't get ratings, they wouldn't put it on. That's how vicious that business is."
- Donald Trump
dailyvisits 1 year ago
Feynman had a beautiful mind -- what is bothering me though ( as he would say) is what he says at 8:09 in this vid, I can't make out the words ---- the sentence is --- "......was that f you did a work a little bit at these things, there would be a time ************* " I just can't work it out -- any ideas -- I think he had a cold on this vid ;O --
TheRamblingBoy 1 year ago
@TheRamblingBoy I think he said "...my father said...that if you work hard at these things, there would be a time when they get easier..." - a nice thought, but sadly not always true
TheZanipolo 1 year ago
lol he isnt a really good conversationalist. consistently dominates the conversation not letting his friend speak.
thegoonist 1 year ago 4
richard was a genious
contrail2k8 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The most fundamental question of all: What is The underlying law of nature.
TedDGPoulos 1 year ago
Wow. Evolutionary "relativity". Amazing!
steph1971 1 year ago
I watch the video many times. Feynman is probably not the best physicist, but is by far the best in teaching physics and showing how to think about the world as a scientist should do. Although there could be debate about scientific method and many epistemology questions, his general view towards knowledge and discovery is always of great value.
sunkith 1 year ago
around 6:15, they talk of the nature of discovery, the moment of epiphany if you will. i love this part of the talk as it provides such an honest moment of connection between the two gentlemen. it occurs to me that there is a symbiosis of ideas in certain mystic philosophy that they do not discuss (at least not yet, i'm only at 7:01), the notion of interest without attachment. (reminds me of the open source mvmnt) thanks so much for posting these interview videos. peace
recyclingismylife 1 year ago 2
Gosh, look at the smile on Feynman's face. He is soo impregnated with the love for research and exploration.
timpanitimptim 1 year ago 2
That discussion - at the end - between Hoyle and Feynman put a massive smile on my face :)) I would luv 2 go down the pub with those 2 - despite the fact that I'd feel like an idiot in comparison.
Where were these vids in my Physics classes?
eaglefort 1 year ago 2
"I'm trying to find out not how nature could be but how nature is!" - Feynman, 1m03s
I'm convinced now that Richard Feynman would have loved to identify, understand and apply the underlying law of nature.
TedDGPoulos 1 year ago
This is the type of individual our culture ought to be celebrating and granting prominence instead of rank cretins like Palin and Leno and the whole herd of showbiz personalities.
fctchk 1 year ago 288
@fctchk
Thank you for that intelligent comment. We need to spread the word through MTV and the News for the general sheep to hear it.
blackknight509 1 year ago
could you imagine what an amazing world this would be if everyone demanded things like this for their television instead of that mindless drivel that is pumped through 24/7? I wouldn't want to meet a person who didn't think this was amazing!!!
thejugglenaut91 1 year ago 6
This has been flagged as spam show
@fctchk Yeah, we get it. Feynman was awesome. You can all quit riding his dick now. Thanks.
TheFrogTower 1 year ago
@fctchk Hear hear! I love listening to him talk.
KaraRvn 1 year ago
@fctchk Neil deGrasse Tyson is another such individual, in my opinion.
onepcwhiz 1 year ago
@fctchk couldn't agree more. this man was put in a world much too primitive for his ideas and insights.
TRUESports09 1 year ago
@fctchk i guess the reason this doesn't happen is because they're rare individuals in the first place. they don't have mass appeal. most people wouldn't be able to relate to him or even understand what he is saying.
crowbs90 1 year ago
@crowbs90 Of course, but the whole point is that he could if only the framework of our society were somehow different. I mean, in the 60's (or maybe more like the 70's response to the 60's), it was cool to be "cool". We aspired, as a culture, to learn and grow, but there's been a retrenchment where it's become cooler to push things aside and go for the quick and easy. I mean, that aspect of American culture was always there, too (in the form of advertising). Only more recently, that's won out.
sex6cult9revolution 1 year ago
@sex6cult9revolution not society. genes. most ppl too stupid to appreciate. even if there was a counter culture movement similar to the 60s where people redefined what was "cool" so that this was included, there'd just be a lot of fakers pretending to appreciate it when they really just hearing a heap of big sciency words.
as much as i'd like philosophers to replace politicians and artists to replace hack pop songwriters, there just aren't enough people who appreciate philosophy and good art.
crowbs90 1 year ago
@fctchk Ahh, you fail to understand the basic premise of supply & demand. Intellectual demand is exceeding low in the world; therefore, the supply is limited. Great minds are out there, but not many can or are willing to listen. I realized this when wondering why very few 'good' movies are made (ones that make you THINK)...same principle.
myrtlebox 1 year ago
@myrtlebox I'll admit that's true. However, at the risk of sounding Marxist, it is also an example of how the relentless quest of personal wealth can prove a detriment to the greater knowledge of mankind. At the least, science literacy in the public.
terriblefez 11 months ago
@fctchk
What about Kendra from the girls next door? Is she gonna lose that baby weight?
racehorse593 8 months ago
Thank you so much for this interview. Perhaps the last part is the best of all, but they are all very good as well :)
13anahita 1 year ago
What an awesome job - going down the pub gettin' pissed and talkin crap!
mallamoozoo 1 year ago 6
i enjoyed the documentary, but i didn't understand most of it :(
2TheDeath 1 year ago
@2TheDeath
Watch it again when you got some extra time ;)
NartSaga 1 year ago
being this enthusiastic about science..contagious
FissionNonStop 1 year ago 7
@3:00 - "No -sigh".
I offer the above as confirmation of my own hypothesis -- It's not the drunk geek who can't communicate, it's the sober non-geek who can't comprehend.
Tapecutter59 2 years ago 6
That was a really high quality No.
nilbud 1 year ago
Truly history's best.
LoardAfroDuck 2 years ago 5
Feynman is well drunk in that pub. Awesome.
Woofsie 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
I never thought I'd find a man who's thought processes are similar to mine on youtube. This man is amazing.
jgdogg441 2 years ago
man, you're saying that you think similarly to the richard feynman? Wow. Unless you happen to be a nobel prize winning physicist I highly doubt it.
thejugglenaut91 1 year ago
@thejugglenaut91 What does being a Nobel Prize winning physicist have anything to do about it? I said Him and I have similar thought processes...not identical brains. There's a difference but apparently you can't comprehend it. Don't be rude to people.
jgdogg441 1 year ago
i'm just saying, it literally takes a genius to have thought processes like his because it is precisely those thought processes that makes him so smart and esteemed.
thejugglenaut91 1 year ago
If you could think at all you'd never have posted that.
nilbud 1 year ago
@nilbud Oh really? Why the hell would I not have posted that? Do you think like me? No you don't, so stop making dimwitted accusations. What makes it impossible for me to think like Feynman? Just because I share similar thought processes doesn't mean I'm a fucking theoretical physicist. Your logic is both flawed AND wrong. Shut up and go home
jgdogg441 1 year ago
@LochlanachViking But imagine if the average man decided Science was suddenly hip? He would corrupt and eviscerate Science. Hence the Discovery Channel, hence the modern Science channel. Popularity corrupts.
Mattprole 2 years ago
@Mattprole Sad, but true. (Proper) Education is still needed. What I mean is the education given must provide context and meaning for the pupil, or else they will lose interest. Imagine if they would play this stuff on television once again!
mikeroephonics 2 years ago
hell, I was almost anti-intellectual for a time until I found richard Feynman. Then I basically dropped everything, and ordered every physics and calculus book ever. Then I majored in physics haha. Unfortunately, the american education system doesn't realize that that is how science has been propagated for millenia: inspiration. They act as if they are just churning out science machines. Just think how many brilliant scientists that could be if it wasn't for our school system.
thejugglenaut91 1 year ago 14
? thats up to you man. The property of science, is, to be scientific.mIf your not, your performing pseudo science. Some are, unknowingly, and do give proper science a bad rep. But, its up to us, to keep to the straight road, and do our double blind controls, and so on and so on...
thelemur 2 years ago
Look how excited he gets when he begins his speech at 1:50, especially from 5:04 - 5:27. THAT is what science should be: a way of fusing the imagination and passion of art with the seriousness and sternness of logic and analysis.
lurdanhelhart 2 years ago 13
What a great man! I wish I had the privilege of being his student. Thanks for posting this.
QuantumTheorist 2 years ago 12
i totally agree with that last part, if there's one thing ive learnt during my education in physics so far, its patience.
jimmyshitbags 2 years ago
thank u :)
bikos236590 2 years ago
I watched all 4 parts. 5/5 and THANKS!!!
mikeroephonics 2 years ago
This was great! THANKS!
orangesfromlondon 2 years ago
Thank you for uploading this
nineinchtaint 2 years ago
Thank you so much for the uploads. Feynman is wonderful to listen too.
RustyCyler 2 years ago 3
"Common Ground Is Enthusiastically Explored."
Why does the interviewer talk as if he is studying some gaggle of geese or a bunch of apes?
Maybe he sees the theoretical physicist as an evolved primate and is now studying them in their natural environment?
Come on! This is Feynman talking cosmology and creativity on a scale measured in furlongs per fortnight, very different to our SI style.
sponsoredwalk1 2 years ago 6
Be that as it may, we ARE primates. You, me, everyone.
TruthBeyond 2 years ago 3
Well isn't that characteristic of the scientific method? I mean Feynman was just an evolved primate.
For all we know there could be beings/aliens/gods/whatever that are far beyond us in intelligence and understanding of reality. In fact it is highly probable.
funkadelica 2 years ago
@funkadelica
Oh come on.... I was joking about the way the interviewer speaks. & Feynman is just expressing himself. I can't wait until I've learned physics to talk the way he is using concepts so developed as opposed to speculation.
But why do people get so anal retentive about such trivial comments?
Anal retentiveness follows from people who reference evolution like you have :(
You've taken a Dawkins book too far, stating the obvious to put someone down is never a smart thing to do...
sponsoredwalk1 2 years ago
You don't believe in evolution then?
nilbud 1 year ago
@ nilbud
A) Why are you asking me that?
sponsoredwalk1 1 year ago
After reading your youtube page I assume you were looking to "provoke" me as you assume I am a "moron" (from your hobbies on ur youtube home page).
Sorry, I wont indulge you in your newfound joyful activity aimed at supplementing the hole that remains now that you've worn out the soles of your party boots ;)
My belief (or lack thereof) in evolution is a personal thing that I don't disclose to just anybody...
Hope you enjoyed what Feymnan & Hoyle had to say anyway...
sponsoredwalk1 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Respect to my fellow pedophile. Richard Feynman, you the man.
dudemandude999 2 years ago
what an incredible human being
CCPlaetean 2 years ago 114
oh and Feynman's coat looks like a woman's... XD
Or maybe its just me..
anafredd 2 years ago
rofl. I love it when they try to talk over eachother. So funny.
Shit, comps overheating. =S
anafredd 2 years ago
thank you!!!!! i love this man. a true genius...
tubette1 2 years ago 4
Feynman was not in the same league as Einstein and Dirac. They invented new theories of matter itself - all Feynman really did was show how to get numbers from a bad theory (QED). He himself regarded his inability to come up with a valid quantum theory of fields (without "dippy math" as he called it) to be a great failure. His honesty about this is one of his best features.
antimatterXXXIII 2 years ago
And so the arbiter of Thought went far on the road of truth, having slain Doubt, Pride, and the forms of Desire, only to stand atop the Cliff of Sanity peering down into the ocean of thoughts. To swim is beautiful. To plunge deep in the ocean is mad, and potentially maddening; for it is at the great depths of the ocean that one faces Insanity, the keeper of truths. Only those that can resist the awe of truths that Insanity possesses can escape Insanity's presence with truth that was sought after
Martin121929 2 years ago 2
what if where you plunged wasn't deep after all.. but only what you thought was deep..
anafredd 2 years ago
In Men, there are qualities that distinguish the two-legged stock from the Reasonable stock, but how Men identify themselves is completely relative. In a situation where a Man of the two-legged stock thinks that he's Reasonable, how Reasonable is it for a Reasonable Man to try and convince the Man of the two-legged stock otherwise, when it is He of the two-legged stock that 'Thinks' that He is Reasonable, and his mind is made up?
Martin121929 2 years ago
Would not the 'Reasonable Man' be of the two-legged stock since his Reasoning has failed him!
Martin121929 2 years ago
uhuh ... ok shakespeare, whatever floats your boat, why do you talk like that?? Do you consider yourself to be 'reasonable' ??
I dont understand your jibberish.
anafredd 2 years ago
ok. well um... i'm, like, saying, like, anybody's reasonable if they, like, think that they're, like, reasonable!
Aight ma nigga, if u think dat u reazonable den u reazonable!
Well, if one thinks that they are reasonable, then they are reasonable!
Si vous pensez que vous etes raisonable, alors vous etes raisonable!
Si piensas que eres razonable, entonces eres razonable!
I think therefore I am.
PS. Be cool fool.
Martin121929 2 years ago
lol. ok ok ok. well done. =D
anafredd 2 years ago