hey, i dont know too much about cars, so i want to know the name of a certain car ive been liking for a while know, i know its a cadillac, but i dont know the name of it, all i know is it looks more luxiourious in white and that the windows are low like this one, and it looks kinda like a cadillac cts only the grill looks different and the windows are more low, and the back like stretch out a bit to the sides, so if anyone knows which car im talking about about, please reply,
Is it longer than the CTS? Because if Yes it is the STS. I would go to the caddy website and look at the pictures section for every car until I found it. But there is also a CTS-V, which has a different front end, rims, etc. It's the perfromance version of the CTS. But yeah, I would check the addy website if you were absolutley sure it is a caddy.
yeah i was mistaken, i thought it was a caddy but it was a cyrsler 300 i checked out the site first before i asked questions but still couldnt find it, i didnt know the name till i saw the car parked at school and saw the name,
I think you might be talking about either (If it is a cadillac) the DTS, witch is like a corprate car, or the STS. Just go onto Google images and search for both and see if its that. Or it could be a BMW 3 series. (Or even a saab.)
i was able drive one of these recently with a friend who works at GM. This thing drives amazing and it handles like a sports car. This car turns heads everywhere we went. For a wagon, the lines are awesome. The hatch curved window is really cool. When my SUV lease is up, I'm getting one of these.
Europeans/Asians get a Diesel option in this car but not North Americans because USA consumers are ignorant. Canadians get the same shit as the Americans. Sad state of affairs. Canadians need desparately more European or Asian diesel options. The big 3 are unwilling to think outside the box.
CTS = Corpse Transport System = Hearse...I understand GM wants to take a larger chunk of the European market, but PLEASE do something with that C pillar.
If I may be so bold, this is much better than the 2010 SRX. That will cost the same, offer less power, worse handling, similar cargo room, and in my opinion, doesn't look half as good.
Why the bulky and heavy looking design? That's nice but the original CTS handling was shit and so bouncy and so much body roll. The Cadillac rep had too much confidence in the CTS.
Wow, I can now get rid of my 04 Volvo wagon that spends more time at the dealer. thank god i kept 84 Pontiac convertible with 300,000miles to get to work.
Garbage wagon. Looks like they took a sedan and simply added on the rear roof. Cadillac has deteriorated radically over the last ten years. Even the interiors are plastic crap. They don't even come close to Lincoln interiors. Perhaps that's why they appeal to the ghetto drug gangs.
You're an idiot, that's exactly what they did!!! Why change the way a car looks if it's already gorgeous!
XD you seriously defend Lincoln over Cadillac? I can understand you preferring some Eurotrash over Cadillac, but LINCOLN? You are a complete dumbass. Lincolns are rebadged Fords.
they're basically ford cars dressed up prettier... i can't believe how much more they are though... you might as well go with a cadillac than a lincoln... only a few thousand more
i know someone who drove this a year ago. in late 2008.
dodgedart74 1 year ago
I wish dodge still made the magnum str8 D:
Choategoats 1 year ago
I like it a lot.
USA4July1776 1 year ago
nice trend in quality
tigereyeheadlightQK 1 year ago
hey, i dont know too much about cars, so i want to know the name of a certain car ive been liking for a while know, i know its a cadillac, but i dont know the name of it, all i know is it looks more luxiourious in white and that the windows are low like this one, and it looks kinda like a cadillac cts only the grill looks different and the windows are more low, and the back like stretch out a bit to the sides, so if anyone knows which car im talking about about, please reply,
TheExperiment45 2 years ago
Is it longer than the CTS? Because if Yes it is the STS. I would go to the caddy website and look at the pictures section for every car until I found it. But there is also a CTS-V, which has a different front end, rims, etc. It's the perfromance version of the CTS. But yeah, I would check the addy website if you were absolutley sure it is a caddy.
CowboyDiplomacy 2 years ago
yeah i was mistaken, i thought it was a caddy but it was a cyrsler 300 i checked out the site first before i asked questions but still couldnt find it, i didnt know the name till i saw the car parked at school and saw the name,
TheExperiment45 2 years ago
I think you might be talking about either (If it is a cadillac) the DTS, witch is like a corprate car, or the STS. Just go onto Google images and search for both and see if its that. Or it could be a BMW 3 series. (Or even a saab.)
Good Luck!
7075403942 2 years ago
my mom told me the cadillac wagon was out a long time ago and wasnt always a ambulance
johrons 2 years ago
i was able drive one of these recently with a friend who works at GM. This thing drives amazing and it handles like a sports car. This car turns heads everywhere we went. For a wagon, the lines are awesome. The hatch curved window is really cool. When my SUV lease is up, I'm getting one of these.
dspartan87 2 years ago
Europeans/Asians get a Diesel option in this car but not North Americans because USA consumers are ignorant. Canadians get the same shit as the Americans. Sad state of affairs. Canadians need desparately more European or Asian diesel options. The big 3 are unwilling to think outside the box.
realcanuckpatriot 2 years ago
very nice now lets get back to business ed where's my coupe?
Tdahoodfella 2 years ago
CTS = Corpse Transport System = Hearse...I understand GM wants to take a larger chunk of the European market, but PLEASE do something with that C pillar.
moaski 2 years ago
If I may be so bold, this is much better than the 2010 SRX. That will cost the same, offer less power, worse handling, similar cargo room, and in my opinion, doesn't look half as good.
Sigma II > Epsilon II
TheNewMrCool 2 years ago
despite dramatic and fancy new product lines GM still loosing marketshare and losing money what a shame
the competition overtook them as #1 in 2008 on a bad economy despite production cutbacks and shutdowns
emforty2 2 years ago
Strange they would intro the stationwagen first instead of the coupe which would probably sell 20 times more. GM is a strange company!
HW2800 2 years ago
the coupe is coming out soon the wagon just came out faster
rmcubssuck35 2 years ago
Another reason for GM to go broke, They are still out of touch with the people. It's just sheet metal why such a heavy looking body style.
kurk4fun 3 years ago
well... this wagon model was designed for Europe. Wagons are very popular in Europe. Wagons are the SUV's in North America.
bowflexor 3 years ago 2
Agreed. It's really unfortunate that Wagons aren't very popular in North America, since they tend to look a lot better than SUV's and 'Crossovers'.
vkeightyfive 3 years ago 2
Why the bulky and heavy looking design? That's nice but the original CTS handling was shit and so bouncy and so much body roll. The Cadillac rep had too much confidence in the CTS.
EuroSport2006 3 years ago
If you want preformace along with luxury, buy a CTS-V.
chopperhead2011 3 years ago
The original was indeed not class competitive, but the new was is quite excellent.
TheNewMrCool 2 years ago
Wow, I can now get rid of my 04 Volvo wagon that spends more time at the dealer. thank god i kept 84 Pontiac convertible with 300,000miles to get to work.
Not sure what to get next Volt or CTS???
trofeo88 3 years ago
here we go, GM out-styles others, AGAIN.
KillerZO6 3 years ago
look better than the srx
Kcdiddy 3 years ago
i prefer the mangnum
carlug03 3 years ago
Garbage wagon. Looks like they took a sedan and simply added on the rear roof. Cadillac has deteriorated radically over the last ten years. Even the interiors are plastic crap. They don't even come close to Lincoln interiors. Perhaps that's why they appeal to the ghetto drug gangs.
culturecritique 3 years ago
youre a fuckin idiot buddy look at the new ctsv is that shit to?
cadidaddy 3 years ago
You're an idiot, that's exactly what they did!!! Why change the way a car looks if it's already gorgeous!
XD you seriously defend Lincoln over Cadillac? I can understand you preferring some Eurotrash over Cadillac, but LINCOLN? You are a complete dumbass. Lincolns are rebadged Fords.
chopperhead2011 3 years ago
they're basically ford cars dressed up prettier... i can't believe how much more they are though... you might as well go with a cadillac than a lincoln... only a few thousand more
quacktackular 3 years ago
not my style but i like it
Dustballguy 3 years ago
I would have liked to have seen a cleaner extended rear window.... but other than that, its a gorgeous wagon. Wagons are cool again.
Jokermachine 3 years ago 3
GM makes the very best cars around and has always i was very upset to see oldsmobile leave because of garbage cars like honda and crappy toyota.
acela2120 3 years ago
Wow, dare I say this car looks sexy?
qernst8 3 years ago
Although it looks a lil weird, at least they didn't go the overrun crossover route.
Billy4202 3 years ago
Video was well presented. Loved that Hot red color.
20031200 3 years ago
I love that car.
broloda 3 years ago