terrible music! marciano would have destroyed tyson. sugar ray robinson would have destroyed sugar ray lenord. duran was another great fighter. boxing is a joke today. in a fight of pure will-marciano would beat ali. ali was the best boxer-beat punchers as foreman, shavers, norton, frazier, ron lyle, jerry quarry, sonny liston-second fight was fixed. early days-fighters were hungry--before t.v. and money. fighters fought to the death bare knuckles. marciano-dempsey-duran-had killer instinct.
Marciano was only champ for less than three years. How can anyone say he was the best if other guys were champ for four times that long-twelve years, like Louis? or Ali? ... jeez... Even Floyd Patterson was champ for longer than Marciano before he lost the title to Johannson the first time.
He had great numbers, but he never had the competition that any of the other champs we call "great" had. Archie Moore, Ezzard Charles and Jersey Joe Walcott were his toughest opponents and Moore was 39.
@fistofate .... ezzard charles is a great boxer learn about him, he was named greatest light heavyweight of all time and was amazing when he went to heavy, ali had 12 more matches than, rocky, and lost 5, also rock had title for 4 years, patterson 5, alis was off and on... the arguments you make are weak and the only heavyweight clearly better is joe louis, the rest are debatable
@00fatmat00 : You think what you will, but there's a tiny minority who agree, believe me.
2) Marciano won the title on September 23, 1952. His last title defense was September 21, 1955. That's less than three whole years: a total of six defenses,
3) the first of which almost everyone agrees was fixed, the return with Walcott in which Walcott got a purse 3 times as big as Rocky's. How does a challenger get that?
@fistofate never said better than all the rest, i say that its a debatable situation. you make fair points but problem many people have is underrating rocky. aside from his record etc he had phenomenal ability which is often overlooked and hes labled as this slugger. he was very defensive and i dont think its fair to just write him off you just got to look deeper than his record and fights.
@00fatmat00 Debatable situation that he might have beaten anyone- yes; but his career wasn't that great. As I said: his career wasn't that long, his reign as champion wasn't that long and he didn't have many good opponents. How does a guy like that wind up winning a computer matchup against Ali? Proof to me that Rocky is overrated by a few fans who take his "undefeated" status a little too seriously.
@fistofate how can you say that anyone who ever lived would have been cannon fodder for marciano with the possiable exception of Ali and a Young Foreman.........Tyson, dempsey a young louis, holmes, liston would have all been counted out........p.s. i would give ray lenord a hell of a chance vs ray robinson....patterson was a joke got his ass kicked vs liston and ali......louis great...but padded his record with his bum of the month club.
larry holmes and marciano the 2 most underated ever
@renduke I didn't say or imply that anyone else would have beaten Marciano. I'm just saying that he had a short career as champ and didn't face many good fighters. It's ridiculous to rate him over fighters who had longer reigns as champion and fought better fighters than he did.
So many greats missing...to many people revert to heavy weights as the greatest ever, and boxers fresh in our minds or since TV viewing! What about: Harry Grebb Sugar Ray Robinson Henry "Hank" Armstrong Joe Louis Gene Tunney Joe Gans Benny Leonard and an old favourite,Roberto Duran. Now these boys are special!!!!!!! Ha!
Pacqiao's been World Champ in 8 divisions! Many old-timers, some who've attended every major fight since the 1950s, consider him the best they've ever seen. Apparently this isn't good enough evidence to impress the internet's "Marciano / Tyson / Louis / Dempsey / Ali" crowd. I can only hope that Manny fights & defeats Sergio Martinez, to achieve his 9TH division title..then there'll no be doubt: Pacquiao's the greatest boxer in history: Power, technique, intelligence, speed, endurance, & heart.
@lazur1, Pacquiao is great (he'd rank about 30th for me) but to call him the greatest is ridiculous, and an insult to men such as Robinson, Armstrong and Greb. Who has he beat to put him alongside men such as Ross, Canzoneri or Saddler, never mind the guys I've previously mentioned? And who are these "old-timers" who rank him as the greatest? Don't give me the line of "but he's won 'titles' in 8 divisions" - does that mean De le Hoya is 2nd greatest? Is Duke McKenzie greater than Robinson?
@iljn1988 The first expert I've re-tracked who thinks Manny's the best ever is Emanuel Steward. I'll get back to you when I confirm others. As long as you bring up Oscar, Manny -destroyed- an in-shape, there-to-win Oscar who had studied Manny well, & -knew- exactly how to beat Manny. But knowing how to beat Manny & doing it are two very different things, even for Oscar.
@lazur1, I only mentioned De la Hoya in relation to the argument that some use of Pacquiao being the "greatest" because he was 'titles' (none of them undisputed, some at stupid catchweights) in 8 divisions. If that's the case, then surely you'd have De la Hoya 2nd, as he won titles in six? The idea of De la Hoya being 2nd is nonsense I'm sure you'll agree, so that alone doesn't make Pacquiao 1st. I did see Steward say Pacquiao was an "all time great, maybe top 10" - any chance of a link?
8countnewsdotcom: "Pacquiao beyond HoF" 10/15/09 Brad Cooney. Steward: "You said it... GOAT...the only modern fighter...Bernard'll be HoF, Oscar too, but none...accomplished what this man has... in the US 9yrs, fighting the top in the business all the way to top welters, consistent in all fights. Even the fight he lost, he fought great...& KOd him the next fight. Everybody available...great performances...an all time great...beyond HoF... all time great w/Alis & Robinsons." (edited to fit)
marciano, ray robinson, lamotta. joe louis vs jack dempsey i dont know lol but the fight would be spectacular! marciano vs ali i dont know either, both have their advantages but i like rocky better. duran vs mayweather hmmm, i hate to say it but i think probably mayweather at welterweight atleast, i cant stand mayweather but he's a great fighter. mayweather vs jones lol, mayweather=dead lol. valuev beats williard based on size, both used size to their advantage but valuev is much bigger.
sugar ray robinson is the best p4p but ali was without a doubt the best heavyweight marciano wud just come forward all the time just like joe frazier george foreman and sonny liston did
I thought Ali was the best of all-time; better than Robinson or anyone... pound for pound even. He'd beat guys way bigger and way smaller. Funny that the smaller ones were tougher for him but he still beat them.
realy forman was like punchbag for holyfield and morrison and he was near a knockout.foeman is just very good by taking shots and is only dangerous for a lucky punch like happend to moorer.
Patterson, Marciano, Ezzard Charles, Archie Moore, Jersey Joe Walcott, Joe Louis, Cassius Clay, Sonny Liston, Foreman, Frazier, Holmes, Holyfield, Bowe were all better than Tyson. There's 14 better heavyweights, as far as best of all time p4p, barely breaks 90-100. In relation to the video, Duran would destroy Mayweather, he couldn't run, he couldn't outbox him and couldnt gun him down, absolutely no chance in hell Duran would lose to him.
you give me a prime fighter Tyson beat that was on the level of those fighters, Tyson was beaten by Douglas, Holyfield twice, Lewis. His only credible win was Michael Spinks who didn't have the heart to challenge him. An elite fighter that takes Tyson past 4 rounds has his number, Charles, Moore and Walcott are among the greatest fighters to have ever lived, Tyson simply isn't. Marciano would take Tyson's punches and give as much back, and Patterson would be too fast for him.
1988 tyson is the best.frazeir has no chance.prime forman would have a chance but he would loose.prime ali could win when he dont gont get hit by some bombs.but when i see how many left hooks catched ali vs frazier it dont looks good.
RETARD LOOK AT THE ARTICLE "WHY WE NEVER SAW FOREMAN-TYSON". PRM TYSON AVOIDED OLD FOREMAN, BECAUSE OLD OR PRIME FOREMAN WOULD DESTROY HIS FUCKING ASS.
MORRISON RAN ALL FIGHT TO WIN BY POINTS RETARD, LIKE HOLIFIELD.. TYSON WOULD NOT RUN,TYSON WOULD NOT RUN, TYSON WOULD EXCHANGE HITS, IT WOULD BE HIS END. PRIME FoREMAN have a chance? lol prime foreman would kill tyson before than he did with frazier... joe had better chin and heart than tyson.
old foreman fought a war with prime holyfield, foreman almost knocked out prime evander twice, old foreman lost by points. with PRIME EVANDER. and old holyfield destroyed tyson twice. YOU ARE A JOKE.
MORRISON MIGHT GIVE MANY PROBLEMS TO PRIME TYSON. george foreman in his prime, would destroy morrison EASY, morrison ran all fight like a bitch, if no... foreman would rape him.
morrison didnt run like a girl lol.he outboxed him and nearly kod him.foreman is very easy to hit and tyson is not that easy to hit.tyson kills that old forman.a young forman is something diffrent.
@vegetayy Huh? I dunno, tough pick, no use arguing about it. I could see a young Foreman beating Tyson, Frazier was a similar style to Tyson and Foreman destroyed Frazier. Both Foreman and Tyson took advantage of a lull in Hvywt talent in the 80s'-90s'. But always remember, for a Hvywt, Tyson really didn't have a great chin, even an old Foreman would have a puncher's chance against him. But, old Foreman was a slow starter, if the fight went past the 6-7th rnd, Foreman would win.
for me 80 s and 90 s were the best boxers.tyson,lewis,holyfield,bowe,mercer,morrison,moorer,tua,ibeabuchi,forman,douglas,mccall,tucker,bruno...and all of them were champions i think
Frazier vs Tyson = 8th round tko or ko! Tyson has very lil stamina to keep up with legends like Ali, foreman and frazier or shaves and tyson hits less harder foreman or frazier!
Sad thing you are saying...Tyson was a realy hevyweight(100kg +) but Rocky was like 80-90 and Rocky did taked most of the damage done when some one hited him and he didnt give a shit,Tyson would be shited after seeing that all his punches done didnt taked Rocky down.
rocky was 83kg, very small, joe walcoot and old archie moore, they(light heavyweights) knocked down marciano,imagine tyson.... and foreman would destroy rocky in 3 rounds.
tyson avoids nobody.he would kill that old man forman.formanwas nearly kod by morrison.its not tyson who chooses the oponents.its fucking don king who manage all.prime tyson owns holyfield lews is and all.
@prayforme111 a boxers prime is when a boxer havent past 33 and is good trained.tyson had this only with kevin rooney.that was his little prime.surely he would get better with continuing training with rooney coz he learned more skills.but he fired him coz he didnt want to train so hard anymore and wanted more amusing in life.
ray robinson should be 1st on any list and pound for pound heavyweight rocky marciano should be number 1, especially since he was smaller than most everyone he fought and ko'd them, ali for his athletic ability, joe luis for his technical ability, archie moore for having so many wins and ko's..tyson shouldnt be on the list but many of the others are good beign on it!
and tyson did face apponents in their prime, a past prime holyfield wasted tyson and so did lennox lewis and both lewis and holyfield are older than tyson, tyon in his prime beat a 40 year old larry holmes and tyson won his title from burbick who was 14 years older than him while ezzard charles was only 1 yr older than the rock and walcott although 38 was still a champion when the rock beat him, roland lastarza was at his best and undefeated when the rock ko'd him.
light heavy calzaghe??he was super middlw8.klitchko is good but not number one lol.klitchko is strong and has range but he cant stand alis speed and skills.
ok....calzaghe super middle/light heavy....ali was a good boxer but took too many punches and had no real ko power ...vitaly is a smart fighter, very difficult to hit and much more powerful than ali !!!
no way jose !!! foreman was very powerful with limited boxing skills...klitschko has it all....respected foreman for his comeback performance and that he remained a gentleman even after he got robbed by a decision to briggs....
@MultiGreat1 What arguement? There is no arguement because I am right and you are wrong. Learn something about boxing and get back to me in about 50 yrs.
@rifleman522 you are wrong, muhammad ali would have beat marciano so would tyson, liston, foreman, larry holmes, evander holyfield. You should go learn a bit more about boxing if not alot. Oh yh i forgot to mention even george chuvalo would have beaten rocky.
@MultiGreat1 Even Ali himself said he didn't think he could have beaten Marciano. I tend to believe the experts. I think Ali qualifies as an expert and knows a little more about boxing than you do. Such as myself.
@rifle Ali also said -Tyson'd- beat him, but -Tyson- said -Ali'd- beat -him- . Dempsey said Rocky'd beat him, but -Rocky- said -Dempsey'd- beat -him-. So much for all the expert opinions.
@loueyikpeba Clearly you have a lot to learn about the sport, walcott was 37 & louis was 38 when they fought marciano........stop typing utter lies & stay off boxing videos from now on.
@rifleman522, I love Marciano, but to call him the greatest boxer ever is a joke. Harsh fact is that the four best men he beat (Charles, Moore, Walcott and Louis) were all either aged and past their best, were natural Light-Heavyweights, or were a mixture of both. He reigned in one of the poorer Heavyweight eras, and Heavyweight is one of the poorer of boxing's 8 'classic' divisions. Marciano is my all-time number 9 Heavyweight, but pound for pound, he wouldn't make my top 100.
@rifleman522 stop being stuck on marciano, he was not the best ever, and while he is my second fave hvywght behind ezzard, many fighters would beat him,a prime joe louis would very well beat him
@00fatmat00 I tend to believe the experts rather than you. Experts like Joe Louis himself. He said he could have never beat Rocky no matter what age he was. Look it up. I think Joe knows more about boxing than you do.
@rifleman522 and what would that make louis sound like if he said he could beat him, a sore loser making excuses, everyone boxing analysts etc know damn well louis would win, he is more of a boxer than marciano, though marciano has supurb defense thats underrated and boxing ability louis was unmatched in his ability in his prime, he would hve beaaten rocky by points, just as others as ali would do, and im not saying guaranteed but only way rocky would win is ko or tko, not points
@rifleman522 and dont get me wrong i love marciano, but throwing him in as greatest ever is a strong statement that discredits many many other boxers, i mean hell ezzard was 1 round away from a stoppage cause of marcianos nose, had ezzard dodged the punches that ko'd him marciano would be 48-1, but i do agree he is greatly underrated
CODY MANA I AGREE the only reason jake had ever lost because it was fixed hed never been knoked down or out he had 2 lose some fights or he would have never got the chance to win the TITLE
sugar ray up your motherfuckin' asses you homo's - whatever & however your "Original sugar ray" was... Not a single boxer to this day could take on Marciano, not a single one. all they can do, is come close to what he achieved.
Thats easy When a boxer goes undefeated 49-0 & 43 ko's! What else can any one really say to top that! So untill someone else can do better than that? By far the GREATEST is ROCKY MARCIANO! Thanks (dab)
There's only one boxer that was never defeated in his boxing career, and that would be Rocky Marciano. The true, Best Boxer of All time. Mohammed Ali has been knocked out by Rocky ( a much smaller opponent ) and beaten by others too. How the hell is Ali considered the best of all time.?! Rocky had 49 fights and retired undefeated. No one else has that kind of record. Smack talk is cheap, the record speaks for itself. Rocky rules!
yea thats a good record but did you know sugar ray went his first 40 fights undefeated then lost to jake lamotta and then went on a 90 fight winning streak?
marciano beats tyson, hed have the best chance against ali, lamotta would kill carmen, robinson would outpoint lenord, dempsey would ko louis, floyd would beat duran but lose 2 roy jones jr
Tyson, Ali, Marciano...all three were great fighters, but none of these guys were the best fighter ever. The Best fighter ever was the original Sugar Ray.
in my opinion, i couldnt predict the outcome of any of the older fighters against mike tyson, i mean tyson was a different animal in his prime compared to any in thier prime, coz with tyson it mostly takes one shot to change a whole fight, there is a reason why he scares many of his opponents.. just my thoughts
That in itself i fairly ignorant as from 1964 onwards the name was and is Muhammad Ali. I do agree though Ali was the best ever. I also think that prime for prime, Ali, Foreman, Holmes, maybe joe louis, sonny liston and joe frazier would take a prime tyson
That's true, but the Rock his only chance to get to Tyson was in the later rounds, and still, Tyson when he was at his peak could box pretty well for 12 rounds. In each case, all respect to the Rock, how was he gonna survive the Tyson onslaught? The Rock was a brawler with nut much defence, a style that will give troubles against Tyson, cause the only way to win against Tyson is to avoide getting hit, the Rock just couldn't do that, he ate the punches, that wouldn't flye against Mike.
marciano would beat tyson. tyson didnt have a glass jaw but he couldnt take a punch. Nobody in middleweight beats robinson. Ali destroys marciano, tyson, and any heavyweight in history except Joe Louis. Joe Louis beats every heavyweight in history. Mayweather beats duran and roy jones beats mayweather cuz hes like 4 weight divisions bigger than him. Mayweather doesnt lose a fight between 130-154. Only guys who give him trouble are sugar ray lenoard, aaron pryor, tommy hearns, and robinson
Hey, I said Tyson was an above average fighter not just average, and how do you know Marciano was in a weak era, did you fight them back then. It's just that no one wants to believe that Marciano a small white heavy weight Kayoing everyone including other weight divisions is the greatest. I could easily say Cassius Clay (Ali) was in a weak era. Heck its going on now, no one can beat the Klitscho Brother's so they simply say we are in a weak era. Bull Crap!
Euhm, cause Marciano only fought bums and old punch drunk light heavyweights who in these days wouldn't even get a licence? Sorry for the sarcasme but Marciano was knocked down by punchers no way near Tyson. Marciano had bad defence and one of the greatest missing percentadges in history, leaving him open for counterpunches. The man was tough as hell but nobody can eat Tyson Punches. He was also much lighter.
Well I think Tyson has about 6 or 7 loses, so they took the punch, and their was some people that went done without the punch connecting "scared". Buster showed that Tyson was a normal above average fighter as after Buster it all went down hill. Marciano fought the best of his erra and when he beat all the heavy weights other weight classes thought they could take him, but no as he was a TRUE CHAMPION. Hey thanks for your reply though!
I'm not a Tyson hugger but I believe you should rate him much abaove average. He was on of the best ko specialistever in his prime.Marciano fought the best in the weakest boxing era ever. He also only had a few topcontenders cause he only fought for the title his 43 th fight. The former fights he fought bums.
AAAAALLLLLLLLLIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! end of story. wee all know he is the best in the whole history of boxing. and maybe marciano to, but the others aren`t even close to these 2.Ali Ali Ali Ali Ali Ali.....
TYson!? over Dempsey, Ali, Foreman and Lewis?..LOL...TYson!!?? Good in his short lived career but he ain't koing Big George or Ali and how is he going to reach Lewis without getting decapitated. You're funny.
lol tyson vs marciano? mike was a sad fighter if he couldnt win he would cheat that lead to the ear bitting which was sad cuz he knew he was gunna lose so he started cheating....marciono went 60-0 with 60 kos.....i think it was 60 correct me if im wrong... but he could stay in a fight and no wimp out or cheat when it got tough and thats why hes the greatest...mahamata was a great great fighter but not as good as rocky so iron mick tyson was not that good...
xxdal- He was GREAT in his prime. Tyson was very good. He burnt out fast but history will remember Tyson as a fast, hard hitting champion. The ear biting was late in his career.
Jess Willard wupps Valuev anyday! Jess Willard is one of the toughest people ever and had about 5 different injuries during that match and still didn't quit.
Marciano. Robinson. LaMotta. Louis (Just barley). Either way. Duran. Jones. Wilard. Cooper.
crowley0312 4 months ago
Sugar ray in my opinion. He truly was the greatest
konami223 8 months ago
Marciano >>> all
QuadraroImp 11 months ago
winners... marciano, robinson, lamotta, louis, marciano, duran, rjj, willard, cooper,
00fatmat00 11 months ago
terrible music! marciano would have destroyed tyson. sugar ray robinson would have destroyed sugar ray lenord. duran was another great fighter. boxing is a joke today. in a fight of pure will-marciano would beat ali. ali was the best boxer-beat punchers as foreman, shavers, norton, frazier, ron lyle, jerry quarry, sonny liston-second fight was fixed. early days-fighters were hungry--before t.v. and money. fighters fought to the death bare knuckles. marciano-dempsey-duran-had killer instinct.
jimmyd10100 1 year ago
Marciano was only champ for less than three years. How can anyone say he was the best if other guys were champ for four times that long-twelve years, like Louis? or Ali? ... jeez... Even Floyd Patterson was champ for longer than Marciano before he lost the title to Johannson the first time.
He had great numbers, but he never had the competition that any of the other champs we call "great" had. Archie Moore, Ezzard Charles and Jersey Joe Walcott were his toughest opponents and Moore was 39.
fistofate 1 year ago
@fistofate .... ezzard charles is a great boxer learn about him, he was named greatest light heavyweight of all time and was amazing when he went to heavy, ali had 12 more matches than, rocky, and lost 5, also rock had title for 4 years, patterson 5, alis was off and on... the arguments you make are weak and the only heavyweight clearly better is joe louis, the rest are debatable
00fatmat00 11 months ago
@00fatmat00 : You think what you will, but there's a tiny minority who agree, believe me.
2) Marciano won the title on September 23, 1952. His last title defense was September 21, 1955. That's less than three whole years: a total of six defenses,
3) the first of which almost everyone agrees was fixed, the return with Walcott in which Walcott got a purse 3 times as big as Rocky's. How does a challenger get that?
Rocky was great, but greater than all the rest?
There's no proof of that. .
fistofate 11 months ago
@fistofate never said better than all the rest, i say that its a debatable situation. you make fair points but problem many people have is underrating rocky. aside from his record etc he had phenomenal ability which is often overlooked and hes labled as this slugger. he was very defensive and i dont think its fair to just write him off you just got to look deeper than his record and fights.
00fatmat00 11 months ago
@00fatmat00 Debatable situation that he might have beaten anyone- yes; but his career wasn't that great. As I said: his career wasn't that long, his reign as champion wasn't that long and he didn't have many good opponents. How does a guy like that wind up winning a computer matchup against Ali? Proof to me that Rocky is overrated by a few fans who take his "undefeated" status a little too seriously.
fistofate 11 months ago
@fistofate thats fair enough and i can agree with that but just because he had a short career, doesnt mean he can just be written off either
00fatmat00 11 months ago
@fistofate how can you say that anyone who ever lived would have been cannon fodder for marciano with the possiable exception of Ali and a Young Foreman.........Tyson, dempsey a young louis, holmes, liston would have all been counted out........p.s. i would give ray lenord a hell of a chance vs ray robinson....patterson was a joke got his ass kicked vs liston and ali......louis great...but padded his record with his bum of the month club.
larry holmes and marciano the 2 most underated ever
renduke 11 months ago
@renduke I didn't say or imply that anyone else would have beaten Marciano. I'm just saying that he had a short career as champ and didn't face many good fighters. It's ridiculous to rate him over fighters who had longer reigns as champion and fought better fighters than he did.
fistofate 10 months ago
marciano the white hope..against tyson yyyyhhh ryyyt lol
rebeliza 1 year ago
chaseybears 1 year ago 6
Pacqiao's been World Champ in 8 divisions! Many old-timers, some who've attended every major fight since the 1950s, consider him the best they've ever seen. Apparently this isn't good enough evidence to impress the internet's "Marciano / Tyson / Louis / Dempsey / Ali" crowd. I can only hope that Manny fights & defeats Sergio Martinez, to achieve his 9TH division title..then there'll no be doubt: Pacquiao's the greatest boxer in history: Power, technique, intelligence, speed, endurance, & heart.
lazur1 1 year ago
@lazur1, Pacquiao is great (he'd rank about 30th for me) but to call him the greatest is ridiculous, and an insult to men such as Robinson, Armstrong and Greb. Who has he beat to put him alongside men such as Ross, Canzoneri or Saddler, never mind the guys I've previously mentioned? And who are these "old-timers" who rank him as the greatest? Don't give me the line of "but he's won 'titles' in 8 divisions" - does that mean De le Hoya is 2nd greatest? Is Duke McKenzie greater than Robinson?
iljn1988 1 year ago
@iljn1988 The first expert I've re-tracked who thinks Manny's the best ever is Emanuel Steward. I'll get back to you when I confirm others. As long as you bring up Oscar, Manny -destroyed- an in-shape, there-to-win Oscar who had studied Manny well, & -knew- exactly how to beat Manny. But knowing how to beat Manny & doing it are two very different things, even for Oscar.
lazur1 1 year ago
@lazur1, I only mentioned De la Hoya in relation to the argument that some use of Pacquiao being the "greatest" because he was 'titles' (none of them undisputed, some at stupid catchweights) in 8 divisions. If that's the case, then surely you'd have De la Hoya 2nd, as he won titles in six? The idea of De la Hoya being 2nd is nonsense I'm sure you'll agree, so that alone doesn't make Pacquiao 1st. I did see Steward say Pacquiao was an "all time great, maybe top 10" - any chance of a link?
iljn1988 1 year ago
8countnewsdotcom: "Pacquiao beyond HoF" 10/15/09 Brad Cooney. Steward: "You said it... GOAT...the only modern fighter...Bernard'll be HoF, Oscar too, but none...accomplished what this man has... in the US 9yrs, fighting the top in the business all the way to top welters, consistent in all fights. Even the fight he lost, he fought great...& KOd him the next fight. Everybody available...great performances...an all time great...beyond HoF... all time great w/Alis & Robinsons." (edited to fit)
lazur1 1 year ago
Muhammad Ali the best
airborne4lf 1 year ago 3
Muhammad ali and Joe Louis are the GREATEST BOXERS of ALL TIMEs
kingdarius1991 1 year ago 3
Marciano #1 of all time.
Mike Tyson? Are you high?!?!?
mrceebees14 1 year ago
Rocky Marciano and George Foreman
stefanoBN 1 year ago
Marciano = WP
88lupara 1 year ago
This is a joke...You're a bum and you know nothing about boxing. comparing robinson to ray leonard????? you deserve to die
sicilianoorgoglio 1 year ago
Tyson vs Marciano: Not in Marciano's toughest day.
Dempsey vs Louis: No chance for Jacky boy.
Ali vs Marciano: A more one sided version of the Rocky Movie.
Mayweather vs Jones: Dumb match up, at Floyd's biggest and Jones's smallest Jones is too big for him.
Willard vs Valuev: Sloppiest fight in hystory.
JDezi4 1 year ago
Top 4
Muhammed Ali
Mike Tyson
Joe Louis
Rocky Marciano
ShaneDavidBrooks 1 year ago
@ShaneDavidBrooks near the mark that mate
RICHARDTOMLEY10WHARF 1 year ago
marciano, ray robinson, lamotta. joe louis vs jack dempsey i dont know lol but the fight would be spectacular! marciano vs ali i dont know either, both have their advantages but i like rocky better. duran vs mayweather hmmm, i hate to say it but i think probably mayweather at welterweight atleast, i cant stand mayweather but he's a great fighter. mayweather vs jones lol, mayweather=dead lol. valuev beats williard based on size, both used size to their advantage but valuev is much bigger.
anselmochevelle 1 year ago
sugar ray robinson is the best p4p but ali was without a doubt the best heavyweight marciano wud just come forward all the time just like joe frazier george foreman and sonny liston did
ben221191 1 year ago
Rocky was the best By far, he was the best heavy weight in history.
beardigady 1 year ago
I thought Ali was the best of all-time; better than Robinson or anyone... pound for pound even. He'd beat guys way bigger and way smaller. Funny that the smaller ones were tougher for him but he still beat them.
fistofate 2 years ago
realy forman was like punchbag for holyfield and morrison and he was near a knockout.foeman is just very good by taking shots and is only dangerous for a lucky punch like happend to moorer.
vegetayy 2 years ago
lemonite1 2 years ago
how did chuck wepner get on this
ziccs18 2 years ago
Mike Tyson is the greatest boxer of all time
toni2pa 2 years ago
all u guys dont know tyson and marciano.u guys even dont know how good jersey walcott was.
vegetayy 2 years ago
ali
primealivstyson 2 years ago
Patterson, Marciano, Ezzard Charles, Archie Moore, Jersey Joe Walcott, Joe Louis, Cassius Clay, Sonny Liston, Foreman, Frazier, Holmes, Holyfield, Bowe were all better than Tyson. There's 14 better heavyweights, as far as best of all time p4p, barely breaks 90-100. In relation to the video, Duran would destroy Mayweather, he couldn't run, he couldn't outbox him and couldnt gun him down, absolutely no chance in hell Duran would lose to him.
scottmc316 2 years ago
@scottmc316
first of all,
cassius clay does not exist anymore, he is known as muhammad ali you ignorant freak.
and patterson marciano charles moore and walcott would never beat tyson
primealivstyson 2 years ago
you give me a prime fighter Tyson beat that was on the level of those fighters, Tyson was beaten by Douglas, Holyfield twice, Lewis. His only credible win was Michael Spinks who didn't have the heart to challenge him. An elite fighter that takes Tyson past 4 rounds has his number, Charles, Moore and Walcott are among the greatest fighters to have ever lived, Tyson simply isn't. Marciano would take Tyson's punches and give as much back, and Patterson would be too fast for him.
scottmc316 2 years ago 4
vegetaty, you are pathetic you know shit on boxing
consta4891 2 years ago
u know nothing about boxing.i box myself and study alot.
vegetayy 2 years ago
you know nothing on boxing... i box, and i know on boxing...
consta4891 2 years ago
1988 tyson is the best.frazeir has no chance.prime forman would have a chance but he would loose.prime ali could win when he dont gont get hit by some bombs.but when i see how many left hooks catched ali vs frazier it dont looks good.
vegetayy 2 years ago
prme tyson avoided old foreman, fucking ignorant..
cus damato knew it... foreman would destroy any short puncher(marciano,deMpsey,frazier,patterson,tyson)
tyson was scared from foreman like a coward. YOU ARE A LITTLE FAN OF TYSON, YOU ARE PATHETIC!!!
consta4891 2 years ago
tyson dont avoid forman u idiot.i tell u again don king decided his oponents
vegetayy 2 years ago
you are a fucking clown ignorant. you know shit on boxing...
look at the article "why we never saw foreman-tyson".
fucking bum
consta4891 2 years ago
forman has only a pucnh nothing else.but tyson has much more skills.tyson is the ulti.
vegetayy 2 years ago
guy... you are very ignorant, george foreman would win mike tyson by ko. and yes, prime tyson avoided old foreman.
consta4891 2 years ago
tyson avoids old foreman?haha!didnt u see what tommy morrison did to forman?tyson kills him.only a young forman have a chance vs tyson.
vegetayy 2 years ago
RETARD LOOK AT THE ARTICLE "WHY WE NEVER SAW FOREMAN-TYSON". PRM TYSON AVOIDED OLD FOREMAN, BECAUSE OLD OR PRIME FOREMAN WOULD DESTROY HIS FUCKING ASS.
MORRISON RAN ALL FIGHT TO WIN BY POINTS RETARD, LIKE HOLIFIELD.. TYSON WOULD NOT RUN,TYSON WOULD NOT RUN, TYSON WOULD EXCHANGE HITS, IT WOULD BE HIS END. PRIME FoREMAN have a chance? lol prime foreman would kill tyson before than he did with frazier... joe had better chin and heart than tyson.
consta4891 2 years ago
old foreman fought a war with prime holyfield, foreman almost knocked out prime evander twice, old foreman lost by points. with PRIME EVANDER. and old holyfield destroyed tyson twice. YOU ARE A JOKE.
consta4891 2 years ago
MORRISON MIGHT GIVE MANY PROBLEMS TO PRIME TYSON. george foreman in his prime, would destroy morrison EASY, morrison ran all fight like a bitch, if no... foreman would rape him.
consta4891 2 years ago
@vegetayy
morisson ran like a girl from foreman.
tyson dosnt run.
primealivstyson 2 years ago
morrison didnt run like a girl lol.he outboxed him and nearly kod him.foreman is very easy to hit and tyson is not that easy to hit.tyson kills that old forman.a young forman is something diffrent.
vegetayy 2 years ago
@vegetayy Huh? I dunno, tough pick, no use arguing about it. I could see a young Foreman beating Tyson, Frazier was a similar style to Tyson and Foreman destroyed Frazier. Both Foreman and Tyson took advantage of a lull in Hvywt talent in the 80s'-90s'. But always remember, for a Hvywt, Tyson really didn't have a great chin, even an old Foreman would have a puncher's chance against him. But, old Foreman was a slow starter, if the fight went past the 6-7th rnd, Foreman would win.
lemonite1 2 years ago
for me 80 s and 90 s were the best boxers.tyson,lewis,holyfield,bowe,mercer,morrison,moorer,tua,ibeabuchi,forman,douglas,mccall,tucker,bruno...and all of them were champions i think
vegetayy 2 years ago
great era of heavyweights. Tua was not champion, maybe he will have he's shot. And i dont think ibeabuchi was either.
Stefanoitch 2 years ago
henrry cooper vs wepner=cooper by points
willard vs valuev= willard by ko
consta4891 2 years ago
ali prime vs tyson prime=ali would win by points ali prime vs holmes= ali would win
joe frazier vs holmes=frazier would win
frazier vs tyson= frazier by tko in the round 12
consta4891 2 years ago
Frazier vs Tyson = 8th round tko or ko! Tyson has very lil stamina to keep up with legends like Ali, foreman and frazier or shaves and tyson hits less harder foreman or frazier!
fighter3223 2 years ago
tyson vs rocky=tyson would win
ali vs rocky= ali would win
dempsey vs louis= dempsey would win foreman73 vs tyson=foreman would win
foreman73 vs louis =foreman would win
la motta vs basilio=la motta would win
robinson vs leonard=robinson would win
consta4891 2 years ago
Sad thing you are saying...Tyson was a realy hevyweight(100kg +) but Rocky was like 80-90 and Rocky did taked most of the damage done when some one hited him and he didnt give a shit,Tyson would be shited after seeing that all his punches done didnt taked Rocky down.
redhatlt 2 years ago
rocky was 83kg, very small, joe walcoot and old archie moore, they(light heavyweights) knocked down marciano,imagine tyson.... and foreman would destroy rocky in 3 rounds.
consta4891 2 years ago
and tyson was not + 100kg, retard... tyson in his prime was 96-98kg... you are an ignorant.
consta4891 2 years ago
holy sht 2 kg diference!!
redhatlt 2 years ago
marciano = the GOAT
Oreillyisthebest 2 years ago
holyfield is 4 years older than tyson.
holmes was 38 years old when he fought with tyson.
prime tyson avoided old foreman, foreman would destroy tyson.(styles). cus damato knew it.
read the article "why we never saw foreman.tyson"
foreman was stronger and harder puncher than vitali or any boxer.
consta4891 2 years ago
tyson avoids nobody.he would kill that old man forman.formanwas nearly kod by morrison.its not tyson who chooses the oponents.its fucking don king who manage all.prime tyson owns holyfield lews is and all.
vegetayy 2 years ago
what? kid, yes yes true true
consta4891 2 years ago
@vegetayy mike tyson was 23 when he was ko'ed by douglas. and 30 when he was TKO'ed by Holyfield.. aint that a boxers prime?
prayforme111 1 year ago
@prayforme111 a boxers prime is when a boxer havent past 33 and is good trained.tyson had this only with kevin rooney.that was his little prime.surely he would get better with continuing training with rooney coz he learned more skills.but he fired him coz he didnt want to train so hard anymore and wanted more amusing in life.
vegetayy 1 year ago
ray robinson should be 1st on any list and pound for pound heavyweight rocky marciano should be number 1, especially since he was smaller than most everyone he fought and ko'd them, ali for his athletic ability, joe luis for his technical ability, archie moore for having so many wins and ko's..tyson shouldnt be on the list but many of the others are good beign on it!
dirtyjew1974 2 years ago
Valuev haha its a joke! Best is Muhammad Ali
2:nd Tyson
3:rd Sugar Ray Robinson
then its between joe louis, rocky marciano and sugar ray leonard.
Rocky Marciano was good but he didnt face any of the best in their prime and thats reality
IceRice3000 2 years ago
and tyson did face apponents in their prime, a past prime holyfield wasted tyson and so did lennox lewis and both lewis and holyfield are older than tyson, tyon in his prime beat a 40 year old larry holmes and tyson won his title from burbick who was 14 years older than him while ezzard charles was only 1 yr older than the rock and walcott although 38 was still a champion when the rock beat him, roland lastarza was at his best and undefeated when the rock ko'd him.
dirtyjew1974 2 years ago
u are one of the guys who see only the statistics.u dont see the boxing.a 1988 1989 tyson no one can beat!
vegetayy 2 years ago
and holyfield was in his prime when he fought tyson!and larry holmes wasnt 40 he was 37 and still good.
vegetayy 2 years ago
vegeaty, you are a fucking ignorant..
consta4891 2 years ago
best hevy wieght ever mike tyson
light hevy joe cawzagie
middel suger ray robinson
welter weight floyed mayweather
light weight roberto duran
best ever ray robinson
forgive spelling ps my opinion
southsidevampire 2 years ago
EVER BEST
HEAVY- Vitaly Klitschko
LIGHT HEAVY - Joe Calzaghe
MIDDLE - Laszlo Papp, Carlos Monson
WELTER - Ray Leonard
LIGHT - Roberto Duran
STRAW - Ricardo Lopez
szerszamos 2 years ago
light heavy calzaghe??he was super middlw8.klitchko is good but not number one lol.klitchko is strong and has range but he cant stand alis speed and skills.
vegetayy 2 years ago
ok....calzaghe super middle/light heavy....ali was a good boxer but took too many punches and had no real ko power ...vitaly is a smart fighter, very difficult to hit and much more powerful than ali !!!
szerszamos 2 years ago
no foreman is better as klitchko
vegetayy 2 years ago
no way jose !!! foreman was very powerful with limited boxing skills...klitschko has it all....respected foreman for his comeback performance and that he remained a gentleman even after he got robbed by a decision to briggs....
szerszamos 2 years ago
foreman kills klitchko.klitchko looks great vs boxer with lower range and slow boxers.
vegetayy 2 years ago
valuev ha ha ha are u havin a laugh
easiflo2008 2 years ago
Marciano best ever. End of story.
rifleman522 2 years ago 15
you're kidding....marciano would have been whipped by fraizer, foreman, tyson, tua, kliltshko brothers, lewis....and more !!!
szerszamos 2 years ago
hahahahaa.....none of those were even half the man Marciano was!!! They wouldn't stand a chance.
rifleman522 2 years ago 17
@rifleman522 marciano is not the best ever not even close.
MultiGreat1 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@MultiGreat1 sorry but you are WRONG.
rifleman522 1 year ago
@rifleman522 yes i am right. i dont even want to go into detail, this agruement is over, got to some who has time
MultiGreat1 1 year ago
@MultiGreat1 What arguement? There is no arguement because I am right and you are wrong. Learn something about boxing and get back to me in about 50 yrs.
rifleman522 1 year ago
@rifleman522 you are wrong, muhammad ali would have beat marciano so would tyson, liston, foreman, larry holmes, evander holyfield. You should go learn a bit more about boxing if not alot. Oh yh i forgot to mention even george chuvalo would have beaten rocky.
MultiGreat1 1 year ago
@MultiGreat1 Even Ali himself said he didn't think he could have beaten Marciano. I tend to believe the experts. I think Ali qualifies as an expert and knows a little more about boxing than you do. Such as myself.
rifleman522 1 year ago
@rifle Ali also said -Tyson'd- beat him, but -Tyson- said -Ali'd- beat -him- . Dempsey said Rocky'd beat him, but -Rocky- said -Dempsey'd- beat -him-. So much for all the expert opinions.
lazur1 1 year ago
@rifleman522 A real Marciano vs Ali fight would be like the Chuvalo fight IMO.
DeCavalcante 1 year ago
@DeCavalcante Marciano was still the best that ever lived.
rifleman522 1 year ago 2
@rifleman522 u crazy?? he only beat old men: louis walcott all over 40 . just like calzague..
loueyikpeba 1 year ago
@loueyikpeba Clearly you have a lot to learn about the sport, walcott was 37 & louis was 38 when they fought marciano........stop typing utter lies & stay off boxing videos from now on.
shotgunshawzy 1 year ago
@shotgunshawzy ok, not 40, but 37 an 38 is clearly past a boxers prime.
stupid mutherfucka.
loueyikpeba 1 year ago
@rifleman522, I love Marciano, but to call him the greatest boxer ever is a joke. Harsh fact is that the four best men he beat (Charles, Moore, Walcott and Louis) were all either aged and past their best, were natural Light-Heavyweights, or were a mixture of both. He reigned in one of the poorer Heavyweight eras, and Heavyweight is one of the poorer of boxing's 8 'classic' divisions. Marciano is my all-time number 9 Heavyweight, but pound for pound, he wouldn't make my top 100.
iljn1988 1 year ago
@MultiGreat1 you're stupid!
stefanoBN 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@stefanoBN lol go and fuck your mum up her ass
MultiGreat1 1 year ago
@rifleman522 amen i love you
domamania 1 year ago
@rifleman522 stop being stuck on marciano, he was not the best ever, and while he is my second fave hvywght behind ezzard, many fighters would beat him,a prime joe louis would very well beat him
00fatmat00 11 months ago
@00fatmat00 I tend to believe the experts rather than you. Experts like Joe Louis himself. He said he could have never beat Rocky no matter what age he was. Look it up. I think Joe knows more about boxing than you do.
rifleman522 11 months ago
@rifleman522 and what would that make louis sound like if he said he could beat him, a sore loser making excuses, everyone boxing analysts etc know damn well louis would win, he is more of a boxer than marciano, though marciano has supurb defense thats underrated and boxing ability louis was unmatched in his ability in his prime, he would hve beaaten rocky by points, just as others as ali would do, and im not saying guaranteed but only way rocky would win is ko or tko, not points
00fatmat00 11 months ago
@rifleman522 and dont get me wrong i love marciano, but throwing him in as greatest ever is a strong statement that discredits many many other boxers, i mean hell ezzard was 1 round away from a stoppage cause of marcianos nose, had ezzard dodged the punches that ko'd him marciano would be 48-1, but i do agree he is greatly underrated
00fatmat00 11 months ago
@rifleman522 and your right
domamania 1 year ago
ali is the best ever
MultiGreat1 2 years ago
Joe Louis FTW
killdroy8 2 years ago
CODY MANA I AGREE the only reason jake had ever lost because it was fixed hed never been knoked down or out he had 2 lose some fights or he would have never got the chance to win the TITLE
nike0212 2 years ago
rocky marciano is the best he wasnt even a real heavy weight he is also my idol
SirBobTurner 2 years ago 3
2:48 his name is nicolai valuev
TRKdtn 2 years ago
u have no plan about boxing
TRKdtn 2 years ago
im sorry dude, but Rocky Marciano beat fighters way out of their prime.
frEEturk 2 years ago
sugar ray up your motherfuckin' asses you homo's - whatever & however your "Original sugar ray" was... Not a single boxer to this day could take on Marciano, not a single one. all they can do, is come close to what he achieved.
fistophobia 2 years ago
Sugar Ray robinson
uzzy2k5 2 years ago
Thats easy When a boxer goes undefeated 49-0 & 43 ko's! What else can any one really say to top that! So untill someone else can do better than that? By far the GREATEST is ROCKY MARCIANO! Thanks (dab)
MrBulldog1965 2 years ago
There's only one boxer that was never defeated in his boxing career, and that would be Rocky Marciano. The true, Best Boxer of All time. Mohammed Ali has been knocked out by Rocky ( a much smaller opponent ) and beaten by others too. How the hell is Ali considered the best of all time.?! Rocky had 49 fights and retired undefeated. No one else has that kind of record. Smack talk is cheap, the record speaks for itself. Rocky rules!
WereSoDoomed 2 years ago
yea thats a good record but did you know sugar ray went his first 40 fights undefeated then lost to jake lamotta and then went on a 90 fight winning streak?
brasildiogo93 2 years ago
marciano beats tyson, hed have the best chance against ali, lamotta would kill carmen, robinson would outpoint lenord, dempsey would ko louis, floyd would beat duran but lose 2 roy jones jr
codymana1 2 years ago
i likeee :)
mulligr 2 years ago
Iron mike 88 no contest .. No one ever had the same viciousness or killer cambo K.O. Punchs
He moves like a pitt bull attacking a cat
TokingOnCheese 2 years ago
Tyson, Ali, Marciano...all three were great fighters, but none of these guys were the best fighter ever. The Best fighter ever was the original Sugar Ray.
brentrich16 2 years ago
in my opinion, i couldnt predict the outcome of any of the older fighters against mike tyson, i mean tyson was a different animal in his prime compared to any in thier prime, coz with tyson it mostly takes one shot to change a whole fight, there is a reason why he scares many of his opponents.. just my thoughts
nitroAhmed 2 years ago 2
Comment removed
consta4891 2 years ago
Comment removed
consta4891 2 years ago
consta , you a fool , you don,t make sence , you can,t even get the year right hahahaha
eddyb6666 2 years ago
Marciano with 200 pounds of weight would destroy to tyson.
consta4891 2 years ago
no he wouldnt, marciano was a poor boxer
Boxinglad123 2 years ago
cassius clay 64-67 is the best boxer ever. end of the history.
consta4891 2 years ago
That in itself i fairly ignorant as from 1964 onwards the name was and is Muhammad Ali. I do agree though Ali was the best ever. I also think that prime for prime, Ali, Foreman, Holmes, maybe joe louis, sonny liston and joe frazier would take a prime tyson
Boxinglad123 2 years ago
i said tyson didnt have a glass jaw but he couldnt take punches. what i ment by that is he didnt like 2 get hit he lost composure
beenz08 2 years ago
That's true, but the Rock his only chance to get to Tyson was in the later rounds, and still, Tyson when he was at his peak could box pretty well for 12 rounds. In each case, all respect to the Rock, how was he gonna survive the Tyson onslaught? The Rock was a brawler with nut much defence, a style that will give troubles against Tyson, cause the only way to win against Tyson is to avoide getting hit, the Rock just couldn't do that, he ate the punches, that wouldn't flye against Mike.
bcibibcibcpCB 2 years ago
marciano would beat tyson. tyson didnt have a glass jaw but he couldnt take a punch. Nobody in middleweight beats robinson. Ali destroys marciano, tyson, and any heavyweight in history except Joe Louis. Joe Louis beats every heavyweight in history. Mayweather beats duran and roy jones beats mayweather cuz hes like 4 weight divisions bigger than him. Mayweather doesnt lose a fight between 130-154. Only guys who give him trouble are sugar ray lenoard, aaron pryor, tommy hearns, and robinson
beenz08 2 years ago
Comment removed
bcibibcibcpCB 2 years ago
from 1986 to 1991 no heavyweight fighter from the past or future could take tyson , maybe jack johnson , maybe !
eddyb6666 2 years ago
in the year 90 buster douglas won tyson by koo......
You do the ridiculous .
You are an ignorant .
Foreman, ali, holyfield, lennox lewis, prime holmes.
They would win to prime tyson.
consta4891 2 years ago
fuck ali....marciano, joe frazier both the greatest of all time!!
jdk7283 2 years ago
wow i agree wit every1 bcibibcibcpCB said part from marciano beats tyson easy
ASTROMUNCHER 2 years ago
cassius clay 64-67 is the best boxer ever
consta4891 2 years ago
Hey, I said Tyson was an above average fighter not just average, and how do you know Marciano was in a weak era, did you fight them back then. It's just that no one wants to believe that Marciano a small white heavy weight Kayoing everyone including other weight divisions is the greatest. I could easily say Cassius Clay (Ali) was in a weak era. Heck its going on now, no one can beat the Klitscho Brother's so they simply say we are in a weak era. Bull Crap!
Clay4legacy 2 years ago
Tyson-Marciano; Tyson win by ko
sugar ray robbinson vs sugar ray leonard ; Robbinson win by ko
LaMotta-Bassilio win by LaMotta
Dempsey-Louis Louis win by ko
Ali-Marciano Ali win bye tko (cut)
Maywheater-Duran Duran win bye ko
Mayweather - RJONES win by Roy Jones, points
bcibibcibcpCB 2 years ago
I give you minus thumbs down as Tyson lost a bunch and Marciano didn't. How then do you have Tyson winning by KO?
Clay4legacy 2 years ago
Euhm, cause Marciano only fought bums and old punch drunk light heavyweights who in these days wouldn't even get a licence? Sorry for the sarcasme but Marciano was knocked down by punchers no way near Tyson. Marciano had bad defence and one of the greatest missing percentadges in history, leaving him open for counterpunches. The man was tough as hell but nobody can eat Tyson Punches. He was also much lighter.
bcibibcibcpCB 2 years ago
Well I think Tyson has about 6 or 7 loses, so they took the punch, and their was some people that went done without the punch connecting "scared". Buster showed that Tyson was a normal above average fighter as after Buster it all went down hill. Marciano fought the best of his erra and when he beat all the heavy weights other weight classes thought they could take him, but no as he was a TRUE CHAMPION. Hey thanks for your reply though!
Clay4legacy 2 years ago
I'm not a Tyson hugger but I believe you should rate him much abaove average. He was on of the best ko specialistever in his prime.Marciano fought the best in the weakest boxing era ever. He also only had a few topcontenders cause he only fought for the title his 43 th fight. The former fights he fought bums.
bcibibcibcpCB 2 years ago
The best ever was Sugar ray robinson, even Ali said that he was the best.
Sdeleman1 2 years ago
AAAAALLLLLLLLLIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! end of story. wee all know he is the best in the whole history of boxing. and maybe marciano to, but the others aren`t even close to these 2.Ali Ali Ali Ali Ali Ali.....
DeepSides 2 years ago
ray robinson was the best ...
won 173 (KO 108) + lost 19 (KO 1) + drawn 6 and he had a 98 fight win streak
ThimplyTheBestht 2 years ago
just the heavys....
ali
marciano
Foreman
Louis
in that order
renduke 2 years ago
tyson is the best ever.and he never reached prime shape
vegetayy 2 years ago
Sugar Ray Robinson
Joe Louis
Marciano
Leeroynumanuma 2 years ago
TYson!? over Dempsey, Ali, Foreman and Lewis?..LOL...TYson!!?? Good in his short lived career but he ain't koing Big George or Ali and how is he going to reach Lewis without getting decapitated. You're funny.
theonlysaltspring 2 years ago 2
oic...well..there's my point..he did fight Lewis and he couldn't reach Lewis and got koed. Poor Mike.
theonlysaltspring 2 years ago
Tyson
Dempsey
Ali
Foreman
Lewis
Maldini000003 2 years ago
lol tyson vs marciano? mike was a sad fighter if he couldnt win he would cheat that lead to the ear bitting which was sad cuz he knew he was gunna lose so he started cheating....marciono went 60-0 with 60 kos.....i think it was 60 correct me if im wrong... but he could stay in a fight and no wimp out or cheat when it got tough and thats why hes the greatest...mahamata was a great great fighter but not as good as rocky so iron mick tyson was not that good...
xxdaltonxx2 2 years ago
marciano went 49-0 with 43 knockouts i think, not 60.
robl101 2 years ago
oh sorry i dont kno where i got 60 from lol minds slipping -.-
xxdaltonxx2 2 years ago
yer he nvr lost and only got knocked down twice in his hole career
ASTROMUNCHER 2 years ago
xxdal- He was GREAT in his prime. Tyson was very good. He burnt out fast but history will remember Tyson as a fast, hard hitting champion. The ear biting was late in his career.
theonlysaltspring 2 years ago
1. Marciano
2. Ali
3. Lennox Louis
Truebloodceltic 2 years ago
ali then louis then liston
Boxinglad123 2 years ago
Jess Willard wupps Valuev anyday! Jess Willard is one of the toughest people ever and had about 5 different injuries during that match and still didn't quit.
DIMMUSAKURABA 3 years ago
mamma mia... era cosi fico sto video...tra un po ci sarà bisogno dell'autorizzazione del copiright pure pe andà al cesso.
orko31 3 years ago
Rocky Marciano
whysoserious1979 3 years ago 3