Anything over 40 mpg is great. At least, you have unhooked yourself from the gas pump.
I would hardly call 50 mpg top of the line though. To earn that title show me 150 miles on a gallon. For now they are all pretty close, give or take 10 miles here or there.
this is scary if u read this far u will die in 10 days if u dont send to any 15 videos in 2 hours good luck hope u dont die Comentarios marcados como spam Mostrar
Hydrogen cars are electric cars. They simply use a hydrogen fuel cell to generate electricity. The fuel cell technology is down the run, but we can have electric cars today. If fuel cells become viable (both with costs and infrastructure) all the electric technology (except for the battery) can be used with a hydrogen car.
what i think car companies should make in the future are clean diesel/hydrogen fuel cell hybrids. clean diesels emit about 500 times less sulfur than they did 30-40 years ago, and emit about the same co2 as comparable petrol engines. plus diesel engines have gotten quieter and smoother over the years. some modern diesels can get up to 80mpg in the highway and an electric car can get up to 50 mpg in the city, giving you an average of up to 65 mpg city and highway driving which is awesome
I think there are a lot of great technologies we could have if the oil companies didn't have the politicians in their back pockets. For example: plug-in hybrid technology, diesel (which could also run on veggie oil) electric hybrid, electric cars, and perhaps crossovers between cars and motorcycles. My Corolla is one of the more misery cars in the states, but in Europe would be a big, heavy, guzzler. I can't afford a hybrid, but really don't need all the power my car possesses.
@alexkvaskov Rephrasing that, it would be "Conventional power cell cars aren't the future, Hydrogen fuel cell powered cars have more potential."
They're both electric, the fuel cell has the great advantage of you being able to drive it, stop, fill up and drive some more rather than have to stop off and recharge for a few hours.
Sure, it's not supercar beautiful but it's relatively sleek and pleasant to look at, remember this is a four door family car so they only have certain tolerances to design to to meet the starting specifications and safety requirements.
Just drive a Turbo Diesel if you need Torque. The Hybrid is still under the Diesel Tehnology when it comes about feeling and consumption, not to mention the torque and the prices!
you have to remember that this is instant torque, not a revving engine.(engine builds power over rpm) motor( has instant power)
A engine is a different than a motor. a motor is electric, engine is not, thus a 13 hp motor that generates power from braking, and has INSTANT torque off the line. there is no need to rev to 2500 rpms before power is made, its more linear being elec
and the car doesnt have 13 hp, it has a 13hp electric motor helping the rest of the engine.
Sage Marie? Sage is cool, but followed by Marie... i know the guy didn't exactly choose his own name, but it's still cool counter balanced by lame, like Gumpert Apollo
The Japanese make what they believe the market wants. For the US that means petrol for cars, and hybrids to extend their mpg. They don't believe diesel cars have a big enough market in the US. Europe is the opposite, half the cars sold there are diesel so they get diesel powered cars and in the future diesel hybrids. Also the new diesels can't be sold in the US until it cleans up its fuel, I believe the sulphor content is too high.
And that's the idiocy of most car buyers here in the US.
Maybe its because i have an engineering degree. But a hybrid just doesn't seem to wash with me. Your lugging around an engine that not doing anything most of the time.
If you put a small diesel engine with similar stats to the electric motor in the car your going to get even better mileage numbers.
I have a 67 Chevy Nova with a 350 V8 and a T4 and with the very basic engine mods I made it gets about 30 mpg city.
I think the Prius design is too complicated, an ICE plus 2 electric motor generators joined through a planetary gearbox, big motors needing a big battery, and being metal hydrid, a heavy one, Its only there to convert some of the power wasted in braking so it can be used when the engine is under load. The Honda version is simple and does the job. Small motor, small battery, small ICE, but accelerates as fast as the more powerful and heavier, and more expensive Prius, plus a more normal interior
When I get around to getting a Digital Video Camera I just might.
Most of the mods are simple, the chip set and the roller cam assembly are the only major changes mods that are a bit beyond the average DIYer.
But what most people don't under stand about getting good mileage is retaining control of your vehicle. You have no control over your engine if you have an automatic.
With a manual you control the engine completely and can choose what gear your in, and thus control fuel consumption.
How does a Geo metro in the 90's get almost 60 miles to the gallon on a gas only engine and a hybrid that runs on electricity alot of the time only get 41mpg? Aren't we digressing?
because the metro was a tiny hatchback with a 3 cylinder engine that weighed almost nothing. However, you are correct, hybrids are crap. Diesel is just as green and more economical until hydrogen or electric technology advances.
Having no sound deadening and safety equipment is why 90's cars are lighter. However they were still fuel injected with catalytic converters, not much different from today. Make a car with a direct injected 3 cylinder without power anything and only 1 airbag and it could probably get at least 50 mpg.
Meeting the NOx standards increases fuel consumption because it requires the manufacturer to run retarded ignition timing and a richer fuel mixture than they otherwise need to run.
Vtech has nothing to do with not having any low end power. the Idea of Vtech is that one cam acts as to different cams so you have a low speed and and a high speed cam in one. the reason for Vtech and why the motor have no low end is because the low speed cam is designed for good MPG and not power while the the high speed cam is made for power how you change this is to put a cam that is more aggressive on the low speed side.
2. That's the original VTEC. i-VTEC is even more sophisticated. It continually varies the valve lift and timing.
3. VTEC was amazing. That's why everyone took the idea as soon as the patent wore off. Toyota calls it VVT, VVTL, VVTLi. BMW calls it VANOS just to name a few.
Another thing. Older cars were undersquare with a long stroke and 2 valves per cylinder, ideal for lots of torque in the lower speed range, then the power race resulted in todays oversquare high rev designs that would have been considered racing engines a couple of decades ago, with lots of power and toque but only if you rev it past 5000rpm in every gear. Those of us that don't wish to rev the hell out of our cars are stuck with torqueless wonders.
this is almost a copy of the Toyota Prius o.O
krissern14 7 months ago
Anything over 40 mpg is great. At least, you have unhooked yourself from the gas pump.
I would hardly call 50 mpg top of the line though. To earn that title show me 150 miles on a gallon. For now they are all pretty close, give or take 10 miles here or there.
Hiteminthewallet 1 year ago
@Hiteminthewallet My car is around 42-45mpg and it's from 1969.
Guess away.
One clue, it's British.
G1NZOU 1 year ago
I love my Insight. I average 4.2 L per 100 km. That is a far cry better than my Element averaging about 10.5 L per 100 km.
GoMetricToday 2 years ago
EPA, fueleconomy(dot)gov
New MPG (tests are more realistic) City/Hwy/Combined
Prius 2010 - 51/48/50
Prius 2004 - 48/45/46
Insight 2010 - 40/43/41
Smart 2009- 33/41/36
Jetta Tdi 2009 - 29/40/33
Fit 2009- 27/33/30
They are all great on gas! Pick the one you like the best, and don't hate the rest!
ripper3200 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
this is scary if u read this far u will die in 10 days if u dont send to any 15 videos in 2 hours good luck hope u dont die Comentarios marcados como spam Mostrar
joez525 2 years ago
Comment removed
maxangleofdangle 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
What a ugly car is the Honda the Prius rules.
Honda is a copycat!!!!!!
Justniceboy2 2 years ago
tu te souvient de la premiere insight ? c'est la prius qui a copié dessu !
sethLOVEusa 2 years ago
Why do Hybrids have to be ugly? I mean, really...
garoiscool 3 years ago 9
At least the original Insight looked cool. This new one just looks like an ugly Prius.
redmartian 2 years ago
True, the original was better looking. But I just think that Hybrids should have a better look.
garoiscool 2 years ago
its the aerodynamics
tmchicago 2 years ago
Probably. But I still think they can come up with better aerodynamic designs for these cars.
garoiscool 2 years ago
well
toyota has some pretty good concepts on their website
5-10 more years
we will have some really good electric cars
tmchicago 2 years ago
I can't wait. :)
garoiscool 2 years ago
ya me too
tmchicago 2 years ago
electric cars aren't the future, hydrogen have more potential - look at the honda FCX clarity
alexkvaskov 2 years ago
Hydrogen cars are electric cars. They simply use a hydrogen fuel cell to generate electricity. The fuel cell technology is down the run, but we can have electric cars today. If fuel cells become viable (both with costs and infrastructure) all the electric technology (except for the battery) can be used with a hydrogen car.
Brettcomedyzone 2 years ago
what i think car companies should make in the future are clean diesel/hydrogen fuel cell hybrids. clean diesels emit about 500 times less sulfur than they did 30-40 years ago, and emit about the same co2 as comparable petrol engines. plus diesel engines have gotten quieter and smoother over the years. some modern diesels can get up to 80mpg in the highway and an electric car can get up to 50 mpg in the city, giving you an average of up to 65 mpg city and highway driving which is awesome
alexkvaskov 2 years ago
I think there are a lot of great technologies we could have if the oil companies didn't have the politicians in their back pockets. For example: plug-in hybrid technology, diesel (which could also run on veggie oil) electric hybrid, electric cars, and perhaps crossovers between cars and motorcycles. My Corolla is one of the more misery cars in the states, but in Europe would be a big, heavy, guzzler. I can't afford a hybrid, but really don't need all the power my car possesses.
Brettcomedyzone 2 years ago
@alexkvaskov Rephrasing that, it would be "Conventional power cell cars aren't the future, Hydrogen fuel cell powered cars have more potential."
They're both electric, the fuel cell has the great advantage of you being able to drive it, stop, fill up and drive some more rather than have to stop off and recharge for a few hours.
G1NZOU 1 year ago
@garoiscool Hey now, this is far from ugly.
Sure, it's not supercar beautiful but it's relatively sleek and pleasant to look at, remember this is a four door family car so they only have certain tolerances to design to to meet the starting specifications and safety requirements.
G1NZOU 1 year ago
@garoiscool aerodynamics
IsaiaIsme 7 months ago
Just drive a Turbo Diesel if you need Torque. The Hybrid is still under the Diesel Tehnology when it comes about feeling and consumption, not to mention the torque and the prices!
radumicu 3 years ago
That video was amazing. Can you explain to me how you got all of that on camera? Hahah, this is definitely a video to remember!
Chick6517 3 years ago
lmao its like going back in time... (power wise)
remember when the mighty Rolls Royce and Ferrari engines only made like 40-160 horsepower lol
i get that its a advance hybrid engine but 13 horsepower is a joke lol
lostaznking 3 years ago
you have to remember that this is instant torque, not a revving engine.(engine builds power over rpm) motor( has instant power)
A engine is a different than a motor. a motor is electric, engine is not, thus a 13 hp motor that generates power from braking, and has INSTANT torque off the line. there is no need to rev to 2500 rpms before power is made, its more linear being elec
and the car doesnt have 13 hp, it has a 13hp electric motor helping the rest of the engine.
get me? kinda confusing...:)
dsmdeegen 3 years ago 6
still getting scammed for the real thing.
Zenneth12 3 years ago
wow that car stinks..its just a copy of the prius..and the prius has better fuel economi!!!
JerZeeBoi91 3 years ago
the only hybrid I'd drive
zizoubilly 3 years ago
Sage Marie sounds like a porn stars name
emerica420 3 years ago 3
no V-TECH power yo? ;((((((
RexieTheKing 3 years ago
Sage Marie? Sage is cool, but followed by Marie... i know the guy didn't exactly choose his own name, but it's still cool counter balanced by lame, like Gumpert Apollo
*youtube comments* FUUUUUUU
yeah i know
lORDELO2 3 years ago
Yet the fundamental flaw still remains. Its a Hybrid, their for it will be carrying around the extra power plant and batteries to power it.
No mater how you package it the hybrid is a bad design. A small displacement TDI diesel will always out stripe a hybrid in fuel economy.
Now if they really want me to buy one of these cars, simply drop the ICE system and go fully electric or dump the electric and go diesel.
db98647 3 years ago
The Japanese make what they believe the market wants. For the US that means petrol for cars, and hybrids to extend their mpg. They don't believe diesel cars have a big enough market in the US. Europe is the opposite, half the cars sold there are diesel so they get diesel powered cars and in the future diesel hybrids. Also the new diesels can't be sold in the US until it cleans up its fuel, I believe the sulphor content is too high.
EnigmaNZ1 3 years ago
And that's the idiocy of most car buyers here in the US.
Maybe its because i have an engineering degree. But a hybrid just doesn't seem to wash with me. Your lugging around an engine that not doing anything most of the time.
If you put a small diesel engine with similar stats to the electric motor in the car your going to get even better mileage numbers.
I have a 67 Chevy Nova with a 350 V8 and a T4 and with the very basic engine mods I made it gets about 30 mpg city.
db98647 3 years ago
I think the Prius design is too complicated, an ICE plus 2 electric motor generators joined through a planetary gearbox, big motors needing a big battery, and being metal hydrid, a heavy one, Its only there to convert some of the power wasted in braking so it can be used when the engine is under load. The Honda version is simple and does the job. Small motor, small battery, small ICE, but accelerates as fast as the more powerful and heavier, and more expensive Prius, plus a more normal interior
EnigmaNZ1 3 years ago 2
db98647- You should make a video on your Nova.
thoughtchallenge 3 years ago
When I get around to getting a Digital Video Camera I just might.
Most of the mods are simple, the chip set and the roller cam assembly are the only major changes mods that are a bit beyond the average DIYer.
But what most people don't under stand about getting good mileage is retaining control of your vehicle. You have no control over your engine if you have an automatic.
With a manual you control the engine completely and can choose what gear your in, and thus control fuel consumption.
db98647 3 years ago
looks better than the prius!
OZilla612 3 years ago
VTEC = EPIC WIN!!!
the rest = EPIC FAIL!!!
carfan2k2 3 years ago
Honda FTW! ^_^ (As Always!)
hondaboii89 3 years ago
13 horses? that puts a shit load of pressure on the engine and raises the gas usuage if someone were to go on high way at 100 km/h
quicksilverb1 3 years ago
What the hell are you talking about?
JaySee5 3 years ago
lol he says the words "efficient" and "Hybrid" ALOT
seph95 3 years ago
How does a Geo metro in the 90's get almost 60 miles to the gallon on a gas only engine and a hybrid that runs on electricity alot of the time only get 41mpg? Aren't we digressing?
powematt 3 years ago
because the metro was a tiny hatchback with a 3 cylinder engine that weighed almost nothing. However, you are correct, hybrids are crap. Diesel is just as green and more economical until hydrogen or electric technology advances.
JaySee5 3 years ago
No.
Metro/Swift is a 3 cylinder turd with no airbags, noisy and in a different emissions bracket than these newer cars.
Todays more stringent regulations actually reduce fuel economy.
jizzmonger 3 years ago
Having no sound deadening and safety equipment is why 90's cars are lighter. However they were still fuel injected with catalytic converters, not much different from today. Make a car with a direct injected 3 cylinder without power anything and only 1 airbag and it could probably get at least 50 mpg.
JaySee5 3 years ago
Meeting the NOx standards increases fuel consumption because it requires the manufacturer to run retarded ignition timing and a richer fuel mixture than they otherwise need to run.
jizzmonger 3 years ago
i hope this beat out the prius in sales. Honda deserved the green award from the very beginning.
svingt 3 years ago
3 words, "buy a diesel." cool tech Honda always impressive.
Honda = innovation in engineering
ex:
1. asimo
2. Vtech
3. reliability of motors
seroyer2 3 years ago
ill give you 1 and 3, but vtech has to be the worst way to make up for an engine that has no low end power
konascrap888 3 years ago
Vtech has nothing to do with not having any low end power. the Idea of Vtech is that one cam acts as to different cams so you have a low speed and and a high speed cam in one. the reason for Vtech and why the motor have no low end is because the low speed cam is designed for good MPG and not power while the the high speed cam is made for power how you change this is to put a cam that is more aggressive on the low speed side.
seroyer2 3 years ago
1. It's VTEC
2. That's the original VTEC. i-VTEC is even more sophisticated. It continually varies the valve lift and timing.
3. VTEC was amazing. That's why everyone took the idea as soon as the patent wore off. Toyota calls it VVT, VVTL, VVTLi. BMW calls it VANOS just to name a few.
JaySee5 3 years ago
i-vtec continuously varies timing.
It cannot continuous vary lift, lift is still varied in stages.
jizzmonger 3 years ago
My mistake. Continuous variable lift is going to be implemented as Advanced VTEC in 2009 models.
JaySee5 3 years ago
I don't think that is true either.
I see no practical way to continusous vary the lift of the valves while keeping the engine reliable.
jizzmonger 3 years ago
Apparently BMWs been doing it for a while. Google "Advanced VTEC" and you'll find it's true.
JaySee5 3 years ago
Advanced VTEC is the same as I-VTEC, it just adds more increments to valve timing.
Valve lift is still changed by locking/unlock different rocker arms together.
jizzmonger 3 years ago
Another thing. Older cars were undersquare with a long stroke and 2 valves per cylinder, ideal for lots of torque in the lower speed range, then the power race resulted in todays oversquare high rev designs that would have been considered racing engines a couple of decades ago, with lots of power and toque but only if you rev it past 5000rpm in every gear. Those of us that don't wish to rev the hell out of our cars are stuck with torqueless wonders.
EnigmaNZ1 3 years ago
Made in Japan = BETTER
Lambo6fo 3 years ago
"Made in Japan = BETTER"
~MOFO~
How do you figure?
jizzmonger 3 years ago
4th comment!!!
rs2p00nz 3 years ago
honda makes great handling and durable cars.
ironchopsticks 3 years ago
cool
wbaussie1 3 years ago
Honda continues to be the greenest car company in the World.
GOdupont24 3 years ago
"Honda continues to be the greenest car company in the World."
~Godu~
By not offering any full-size pick-ups or SUV's?
jizzmonger 3 years ago
wow , thats impressive
andrew3112 3 years ago 2