Flight77.info - Extended Doubletree Video

[Jordans03]

What is the proximity of the hotel to the pentagon?? What view of the pentagon does the hotel have??

[chessmassacre]

Yeah right! I have watched this video countless times and you can't see jack to ascertain what it is. No tail, no body of plane.For all you know you could be seeing the flare of a missiles thrust. If this was a plane as you "government plants" are suggesting, then why has the government STILL not given any true footage of the event?Why did they cut out video stills of the one piece of video evidence they did hand out.It shows the explosion but no plane, the frames were investigated, said cut out

[lcaycho]

is too large to be a missile, after watching this 10 times, I realized that the plane is there, you can see the triangular shape of a wing in the minute 1:50

[sausagedogheaven]

A video of an explosion with no plane.

[omglollmao123]

What is the object that appears from 1:36 to 1:40, travelling in a path almost exactly like the one shown by the alleged "757" seconds later, above the highway, that the camera conveniently cuts out?

[LTAMIronHell]

A car on highway

[scar3crow1]

Also note the tape change at 1:40 then back right after the man looks at the plane flying away. Also it looks like the man took picture of the plane flying away with a camera phone or a camera. Who Is This Man?

[scar3crow1]

Ok how about this. If you will follow along with me you will see that there is a second plain leaving the sceen. If you will pause at 1:50 please note the "tail" of the plane. Now if you will pause at 1:56 you will see the tail of the plane outside the second pole from the right. Now if you will look at the man looking to the right. The explosion is on the left, WHAT is he looking at.

[shnarfers]

this is actually double crescent moon meaning the mark of satan.

its on everything. seriously why would virtually every corporate brand use a crescent moon?? they are with the king of commerce aka satan.

am i wrong?

[onesliceshort]

Please check out

´New Documentary - The Pentagon Witnesses´

9 parts

VERY IMPORTANT

[Bongofury361]

They have 86 cameras around the Pentagon, and with that many, they should have some clear video of a 757...but they don't!

[papaney1]

The video footage shows time from 9:28:34 to 9:41:59. That is 12 minutes and 27 seconds. The youtube video time is 4 minutes and 22 seconds. It is hard to see anything very clearly when watching something that is playing 3 times faster than normal.

[fjdksla243]

how conveient, its unclear

[SafetyLight]

Ugh! I've strained my brain watching this thing now a couple dozen times. I can't see a damned thing. In fact, the spot where the plane ought to be looks more like a series of Photoshop rubber-stamps of indistinct sky blotches. Yet some people here are actually capable of saying they see a plane clearly and one guy even states, "It's Massive!" How's *that* for effective mind-programming? --And through nothing more than print media and television.

[LordofBusinessX]

Watch "the Zeitgeist" Wake up people!! Seek the Truth!!

[sparky8313]

whats the movie about

[Esnir]

"whats the movie about"

About the story of jesus being a rippoff from the story of the egyptian god horus and how that story is used to controle and manipulate people.

[misguidance10]

lol. this video shows absolutly nothing!

damn dumb gringos

[ianlondeo]

Be nice if the pentagon would release more video. They have cameras all over place and yet they release a few seconds of video.

[DkEugen]

"They have cameras all over place and yet they release a few seconds of video."

Really? Have you seen these cameras? Do they all just happen to point directly at AA77's flight path?

[maxibest1986]

if this video is authentic and hasn't been tampered with b4 it's release then i'd have to say that it was a passenger plane that hit the pentagon. there's no way the tail wing u see is from a missile or anything other than a big plane, its massive.

[Airportchris2]

lol, I don't see anything in this video, that shows a 757, and that white object you see right before and at impact, is a truck.

[goldy07]

The Sheraton video is missing?? Hmm. so what is up with the weird glitch in the video? why does it keep phazing out like it does? Why does it lock up at key points? I guess it degraded a bit over the years?? shows the recording underneath it from another day? Too bad the freeway wall is in the way. Oh well.. its a dead horse. go on with your lives. Bush is almost out of office.

[DkEugen]

no, the camera was right on, there was just and overpass in the way.

[Cannoli440]

Umm first of all there is not a single peice of evidence that there was a plane that hit it... so... this video shows nothing....

[DkEugen]

There are at least 100 pieces of evidence (n the form of 100 pieces of debris, not to mention bodies, eyewitness accounts, and luggage)

Also if a video shows something it is evidence, you can't say it shows nothing.

[gibbie513]

have you seen the video, "where is the plane?", he raises some great ?s

[tearlach45]

how can just about 90% of the plane just evaporate yet bodies are still intact, surely if the jet fuel burnt away most of the plane, it would have burnt away the bodies as well?

Your theory is bullshit.

[DkEugen]

"how can just about 90% of the plane just evaporate yet bodies are still intact"

Who ever said that? my theory certainly doesn't say that!

[tearlach45]

of course it does, you claim that small parts of thep lane were found, PLUS bodies, theres no chance that if only small parts of the plane were found thatthe bodies would still be there, its phyiscially impossible.

[DkEugen]

no it's not. JAL123 slammed into a mountain leaving a UA93 style crater, and four people SURVIVED. That's right, they were alive when found on the scene the next day.

You can't predict what happens in a plane crash with "if this than this" reasoning, bodies survived flight 77 just like the life jacket survived the crash of flight 11.

[leftysergeant]

It actually takes more heat, much longer to cremated a body than to melt down all the fuselage skin of an airliner. Google cremation. The plane did not Vaporize." They just tend to get rippedto tiny shreds in collisions with vertical surfaces past 300 mph. Bodies, being relatively soft, are less prone to shattering. The skin pops off an aircraft rather easily, sometimes without disabling the aircraft. This is why some small pieces of it were widely distributed over the P-gon gorunds.

[Melloncollie1001]

some evidence was found but the rest of the plane was melted by jet fuel, but yet bodies were indentified?

[DkEugen]

They didn't identify whole bodies obviously; you only need a tiny sample for DNA identification.

[ClunkityClunk4Truth]

There were many plane pieces that survived the impact.

[Airportchris2]

If you considor tin foil plane pieces.

[JeVoudrais12]

where is the supposed blip/plane/whatever

or is the point here

that there is not 1

was this the CCTV footage fromt he Sheraton hotel that the FBI confiscated

[JeVoudrais12]

is this from the Sheraton hotel: did the footage get released

[Esnir]

"is this from the Sheraton hotel: did the footage get released"

No, this is the double tree hotel footage.

The sheraton hotel footage seems to be missing.

[Spitamenes]

I do not see any plane. This video does not convince me that a plane hit the pentagon.

[queen4aday22]

notice lots of people running around, looking over towards the pentagon, same day same time, no suspicions here, apart from this cup thing obviously... sighs

[queen4aday22]

you would have to have amazing eyesight if you could, its not exactly the clearest of pictures is it. well i'm guessing your a CTer because only they would find something "suspect" about a cup or whatever it is. oh and cameras do sometimes change view and its hardly suspicious AFTER the crash, you'd maybe expect it to change before if its been tampered with

[queen4aday22]

looks like its thrown from a vehicle behind it. if thats all you can come up with to complain isn't right about this video then your really clutching at straws, a phantom cup.. thanks you've made me chuckle anyway

[brokencasket]

dipshit the point is.....do you see anyone drop the object?

I said nothing about a conspiracy , did I? I don't see a car window open either.....

[queen4aday22]

a cup comes from nowhere... my god what a conspiracy.. oh look theres a car right behind it perhaps someone just couldnt be bothered to find a trash can.. naughty should get fined for that.. oh wait guess that huge fire over there might be overshadowing this poor unfortunate "cup"

[queen4aday22]

doesnt appear altered to me, and since according to some people it does not show ANYTHING anyway, what would be the point. and if that was a missile some of you claim to see then someone did a bad job of editting it by leaving the "missile" in!

[brokencasket]

unless of course something was on the lens? Naaaaah......

[brokencasket]

This video's been altered......look after plane crash....9:36:57 to 9:37:04 camera changes view, then at 9:37:07 something drops on parking lot (cup?)but no one is in camera view as it drops....? But why was it altered after plane crashes???

[queen4aday22]

its quite big for a missile, although who can tell much from this distance

[queen4aday22]

oh great, CTers.. hello

[dlwalsh]

Helllllo. There are the VDOT videos from the road, that clearly show the pentagon & a tall Sheraton Hotel clearly showing the pentagon. These videos are in FBI's hands. This is a joke.

[GreatHakuProductions]

Plane? Looks more like a missile to me.

[queen4aday22]

also seems to be travelling too fast to be a vehicle

[queen4aday22]

after studying this by pausing it constantly you can see something which does look like a plane, it seems to be travelling in such a way that it cant be a vehicle its trajectory does not match that of the vehicles passing

[Mik3US]

Also, you can clearly see the wing of the aircraft, right before the plane hits.

People are probably mistaking it for a vehicle, but the white object had a triangular shape, and disappeared from behind right when the explode occurred.

[bulldawgs50]

Did they evacuate the hotel or something?

[Mik3US]

Most likely.

[snizzlemafizzle789]

AT 2:54 look at the change from 2001 to 2000, also when they show the man after it hits, the film jumps, if this evidence was taken, it could of easily been modified to back up their claims of it being not caught on camera because of the time lapse..

[beetlejuiceflorida]

A typical security camera does not record in real time like a camcorder. Watch the time-code at the bottom of the screen, and watch the people suddenly disappearing from one point and reappearing several feet away. Wow, did they do magic? No. So chances are the airliner also would not be seen. The FBI released the tape because it showed nothing significant. But; just because you didn't see it, doesn't mean it didn't happen.

[marek0086]

i will be satisfied when i see goerge bush at my house hooked up to a polygraph machine.

[marek0086]

in this case...when something is said to be "official"....you know its a lie :D

[DkEugen]

saying that is the moast obvious sign of ignorance.

[mitch61181]

this tape was cleerly tamperd with,if it was a plane you should be able to atleast see a shadow at oh around the time the tape magicly gets screwy

[DkEugen]

how so if the overpass is in the way?

[F4O4U4R4S]

why does the video screw up at 9:33:32 and the explosion takes place at 9:34:11. exactly .79 of a second before the explosion?

[dlb816]

WTF is that supposed to even show besides a whole bunch of nothing??

[Kimleyers]

if they are so sure that a plane hit the pentagon than why are they holding on to the footage of the crash?! there's something not wright about that .

[savageUSA]

Remember the FBI took the tape & held it from us for 6+ years.That is plenty of time to doctor it.Maybe they dont want us to see the plane?Maybe the plane was not civilian.Maybe it was an attack drone?Maybe I'm asking stupid questions & should be jailed or killed for daarriinngg to be skeptical of "new" footage.Maybe it was a plane & everything is as it should be?Just dont be a media bot.Think for yourselves.

[DkEugen]

you can hardly see the plane in the first place!

[innerswedish]

any sane human can see that there is no distinguishable 757.

[KrisLangley]

Any sane human who saw the airplane that day could testify to the fact that an AIRPLANE hit the building.

I have no idea why Americans are so gullible to believe anything other than what actually happened. Thanks, Lee Harvey Oswald and Jim Garrison, for fucking it up for the idiots.

[DkEugen]

and thanks to OS for his stupid movie!

[bengals101]

because the time on the hotel camera might not have been set to the universal time

[bejbous]

Why is here Impact at 9:34.12, when officially is it 9:37:46?

[zipzip1999]

arus808, this is not what we're talking about.